Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution No. 119-14
• RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED COMMON BOND WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX CREDIT REQUEST WHEREAS, Common Bond has proposed to construct a 50 unit Multi-Family housing development in the City of Rochester; and, WHEREAS, the housing proposal was presented to the Rochester City Council and received support of that group; and, WHEREAS, the housing proposal meets the needs of the City of Rochester as to the provision of affordable workforce housing; and, WHEREAS, the success of the application is predicated on local support of the proposal. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Rochester, supports the application for the tax credits for the construction of a 50 unit multi-family housing project by Common Bond Communities. • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY OF , 201h. 2 t.'e PRESIDENT SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST: / ,41,tti J - A�=q',�--- CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS ` ` DAY OF A0-� , 2014. MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Res 10/Support.Common©ond2014 • be constructed before other construction SWI IS. top of the bedrock(impermeable liner required) • O Areas that receive discharges from industrial PERNIAN'EN'T PONDS facilities which are not authorized to infiltrate ❑ Entire drainage/service area shown(in drainage report). stornlwater under an NI'1)1.'S/Sf)S Industrial ❑ 50 scale or larger grading plan with pond cross section. Stornmater Permit issued by the MICA O Where possible,provide a farebay at the inlet;locate inlet ❑ Areas where high levels of contanlinants in soil or and outlet at opposite ends of pcind;and provide length to groundwater will be mobilized by the infiltration width ratio>3, stormwater ❑ Mulli-cell design where practical. ❑ Areas of predominately Hydrologic Soil Group 1) ❑ 10:1 bench is provided for first I loot of depth below normal (clay)soils(City approval required in these water elevation conditions) ❑ 4:1 max slope from normal wafer elevation to 100-year water elevation. ❑ 3:1 max slope below normal water elevation. iNFILTRATION/FILTRATION ❑ Pond depth is 4 to 10 feet based on normal water level. O Infiltration/f iltralion 13ME'may be used to retain the I" O Normal Water Level elevation is shown. water qualify volume on site(no discharge to surface ❑ 100-year high water level is shown. water). O Inlets are at or below normal water level ❑ Type(.,.-)used. ❑ Outlet is designed to prevent short-circuiting and discharge O infiltration basics of floating debris. ❑ Infiltration Irenches. ❑ Permanent pool volume=1800 cf per acre drained. ❑ Rain gardens. O Water quality volume equal 10 1 inch runoff from total ❑ Sand filters. impervious surface area,at ultimate development. ❑ Organic tillers. ❑ Outlet size to discharge no mare than 5.66 cf's/acre of pond ❑ Bloretenlion. surface at water quality volume cle:vation. ❑ Natural depressions(lvellands not included) ❑ Energy dissipation oil outlet piping. ❑ Other: ❑ Areas less than I nere not draining to pond managed by: ❑ 1'loalables removed before infiltration/filtration system. ❑ Grassed swales. O Site sensitivity analysis included. ❑ Small ponds. O Evaluation of hydrologic impact included. O Grit chambers. ❑ infiltration scheduled tiller full site development and ❑ Other: stabilization. ❑ Emergency overflow spillway is provided to ncconuna(late ❑ RUIlOfl'L011lcd mvay from Infiltration system during 100-year event.High point elevation and direction or Coll stildion. • overflow are marked on plans, ❑ Site controlled to minimize sail compaction. O Fi nergency overflow spilhvay is located to protect adjacent O Pretreatment sediment removal included. property and large till sections. ❑ Designed for I inch of runoff Pram total impervious surface ❑ 100-year runoff which is designed to Ilow to the pond does areas Ibr ultimate development,drains within 48 hours. not bypass the pond;unniodcled 100-year flow does not ❑ System bypass Ibr flows that cannot he filtered. enter the poll([. ❑ N'tininuun vertical separation of 3 feet between seasonally O Minimtnn 10'width at top of dam(it'dam is< 15'high)• saturnicd soils(or bed rock)and bottom of O 12'wide access and turn-around area liar maintenance infiltration/filtration system. vehicles is shown on a slope< 15%,cross slope<6%. ❑ Soil test results,System capacity calculations,and ❑ Pond access is included in a min. 15'wide portion of the computer modeling results included. pond outlol.If access is in an easement across private ❑ Mininium 10'width maintenance access provided. property,a 12'(vide paved access road is provided. ❑ Infiltration systems not permitted for vehicle fueling or O Seed mix Mn/DOT 33.261 Ibr a Ill'perimeter around the service areas pond.Seed mix rNIn/DOT 35-241 Ibr the remainder of the pond oullol, iV,TF.RNATIV[ AND COMBINED PRACTICES O DNR dam safely permit obtained if dam height is>G and ❑ Combined practice(narrative in drainage:report). storage to top ofdam is> 15 acreJl. ❑ Alternative practice(narrative in drainage report). ❑ Full calculations and plans included(narrative in drainage INFILTRATION DiSQUALIFICATION CIIECKIJST reporl). ❑ Infiltration is prohibited when the infiltration system will be constructed in: O Areas than receive discharges from vehicle fueling or "As a reference document see maintenance. lder-I\ ws__lud- ❑ Areas with less than three(3)feet of separation prugran ImcalVr;1SIVrnl\\;Ikn-nnmta gemenUnlinllcsOlns- distance 1 om the bottom of'Ole infiltration system to tilnrnl}canu nunni,r il.lrtnil the elevation ol'the seasonally saturated soils or the ADDITIONAL NOTES: • p 1 SUBDIVISION AND NON-RESIDEN'rim,L.o'r dR> GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST Revised April 2014 KeyY Site; 0=Yes OO =No Prepared 13y: Date: Blank,==Not Applicable Reviewed By: Date: GENERAL ❑ Stabilized vehicle exit(s)arc provided,minimize number. 13 Allas 14,Volume 8 rainfall depths must be Used with an ❑ Sill fences are provided per BMP Manual 6.3I, In SCS Type 11,24 hour distribution. Rainfall Depths are its concentrated flow areas is"high now,heavy duty"type. follows for the listed design events;2yr:2.94inchcs, 10yr: ❑ All storm sewer inlets,existing and proposed,have inlet 4.47 inches, 100yr:7.81 inches protection/temporary sediment control that remains until up. 13 NPDES permit including S\\lPPP is referred to on plan slope nreas are stabilized, O Completed grading permit application form. ❑ Maximum unbroken 3:1 or steeper slope of 75 I-eet O Final grading plan is signed by it licensed professional,5 horizontal copies.One copy of other documentation. ❑ Temporary stockpiles include additional sediment control ❑ Submitted Signed Drainage Report per City Template and temporary cover alter Id days(7 days if discharging to ❑ Owner nanoe(s),email address,and address(cs)listed on and within I mile of impaired water). Grading Phut. O Soil within I mile orimpaired water stabilized within 7 ❑ Plan is 1"=50'or larger scale.North arrow shown. gays' ❑ Percent or slope is shown for streets and drainage smiles, ❑ Plan is drawn in two-foot contours.All finished contours ❑ Pill&cut property line setbacks are.>2'for cut slope lit. and adequate existing contours are labeled. > 10'or rill slope lit.>4':setback is dimensioned on the O Existing contours are dashed and proposed are solid. plans. ❑ Directional arrows tire Shown Ibr proposed thainage' ❑ All proposed In corner elevations tire shown. ❑ Details of terrain and drainage tare provided l'or areas ❑ Proposed elevations of garage and lowest floor,ground at adjacent to tile proposed grading. front and rear orbuilding,along with the structure type are ❑ Existing public and private utilities are shown. indicated on the plan, O Boundaries of drainage area,,shown(in drainage report). O Top of foundation is mitt.G"above the ground. ❑ Soil tylocs shown(in drainage report). ❑ Areas not to be disturbed cleariv delined, ❑ Grade 1'below top of foundation 10'from building. • ❑ ALL receiving waters,including wetlands,within I mile ❑ Freeboard to structures.Floor el.or the grade adjacent to the shown or identified,including impaired waters. building is tit least r above any overflow elevation,and at O Property limits are shown.Streets are labeled,Lot&block least 2'above any pond 100-year water level,whichever is inRornutiion.Street address shown,if known. greater and min.I'above FFNIA flood cl. ❑ Proposed sidewalk shown flor commercial/industrial sites. O Drainage flows away from structures at min.2%. ❑ County/N4NDO"T permit obtained for work in their ROW. O Temporary or pernianent diversion swales,stabilized with ❑ Substantial Land Alteration approved for elevation changes turf mat,pipe,riprap,are used at the top of slopes exceeding > 10'or other criteria that require a SLA. 4:1,when applicable. o ❑ All City Council approval conditions are niet. ❑ IMinimum lot slopes tier vegetated areas are 2/o mininwnl. ❑ The following wrens are tabulated for residential(acres): ❑ All exposed soil stabilized in 14 days. • 'Total platted area(site area) ❑ Temporary or permatent cover is indicated for all disturbed • Total area disturbed areas.Temporary seeding specifies seed mix including disk • Total developable area(excluding lloodway,natural anchored mulch on all slopes-200'or>5%.Permanent steep slopes,&wetlands). cover specifies 4"min.topsoil,seed mix and disk anchored mulch,or 4"min,topsoil and sod. ❑ The following areas are tabulated for non-residential O Slopes sleeper than 4:1 and 4:1 slopes longer than 30'are (acres)' seeded and protected with erosion control blankets or Sodded • Total project area and staked, fllanket category specified per Nun/DOT 3835.1 • Total impervious areas otpniject,existing&proposed. Plan depicts required blanket locations. • "Tabulation of total and impervious area by tax parcel. ❑ Statement that slopes sleeper than 4:1 are stable from hand- ❑ Schedule of l3N-IP installation shown, sliding and surface erosion.Geoteehnical report lior slopes ❑ BjMP details included. >3:1. O Concrete washout management and waste control BN414 ❑ For sites where temporary or pernlnncnt cover will not be addressed oil plan, complete by November 15;plan indicates adequate ❑ Deivatcring activities discharge to Ircatment facility measures to control spring erosion&sedimentation. ❑ Per the NPDF.S Construction Storm\\later Permit,the date and amount of all rainfall events greater than'/,inch in 24 DIL\INACE S\1rALES ee EASEMENTS hours must be documented. Rainfall anoounts must be ❑ Drainage and Utility easements are shown and labeled on obtained from it properly maintained rain gunge installed on the plan. site,n weather station within I mile of the site,or a wenther O Drainage casements are provided where concentrated Ilow i.S reporting system that provides site specific rainfall rainfall received from more than I adjacent lot and also where data from radar summaries. concentrated flow is received from more than I acre of • SI'TI.GRADING SEDIMENT& EROSION CONTROL, adiaccot property. I00-year now contained in casement. ❑ Down-slope sediment control scheduled before grading. 0 Adiaccnt property protected front drainage and sediment. DRAINAGE SWAL ES& EASE.N1ENTS(continued) O For other than III&R2,drainage from impervious surfaces ❑ Minimum dmimage easements for flows from I acre or less is collected on-site and not sheet drained onto sidewalks, or 4 lots or less area minimum of 15'wide.Ditch is rights of way or adincent properly, 1.9'deep V-shaped with 4:1 slopes, O Concentrated drninage is collected in CB before crossing, ❑ \-lininrtun drainage easements fin•flows from more than I walk. ncre or more than 4 lots are n minimum of 20'wide.Ditch is ❑ Overflow stales are provided which limit the depth of a minimum of 2'deep with a 4'bottom and 4:1 slopes up to ponding in the street to Tor less. the easement line. 100-year runoll'conmined in easement. O Emergency overflow with the high point elevation and ❑ Control elevations tier drainage ways tire provided. direction ofoverflow nre clearly marked on plans. ❑ Mininttam slope of small drainage stales is 2/u. ❑ Drainage casements f'or flow from more than I ncre or 4 lots ❑ Emergency overflow swale meets minimum drainage are seeded and protected with erosion control blankets or casement standards noted above. sodded. Blanket category specified per NIn/DOT388S.1. Plan depicts required blanket locations, OUTLETS& ENERGY DISSIPATION O Velocity computations are provided for drainage casements O Discharge:direction orr lot generally 45 degrees or less to where concentrated flow from more than 2 acres or 8 lots is the flow direction of receiving ditch or stream. directed.Where 10-year velocities exceed 5 Il/sec, ❑ Discharges to rear property lines shall generally be pipet)to permanent turf reinforcement mats are installed per City std. at least the rear property line. plate 7-07.Mats per IvInfDOT 3888,1 or manufacturer and ❑ Where discharge pipe velocities are 10 I'ps or less,riprap and product is specified. Plan depicts blanket locations and cross filter volumes tire indicated in necordance with NMIDOT sections. Standard Plate. ❑ Easement documents are signed and submitted to Public O Where discharge pipe velocities toe greater than 10 fps, Works with recording fee or included in plat. energy dissipater is provided along wish riprap and tiller. ❑ Ditches within 200'ofsurrace water or Property line O Discharges on slopes steeper than 10%shall not be allowed stabilized in 24 firs after connection unless discharge is into existing drainage ditch and volume of water in ditch is not greater than 110%of the pre- smIUNI DRAIN SYSTEM INLETS R OVE,RFLON1'S developed condition. ❑ Atlas 14 Intensity-Duration-Fralucncy(IDP)curve must be ❑ Pipe outlet energy dissipation complete within 24 hours of used when designing storm sewer system using the rational connection to surface evaier or outlet. method. ll'storm sewer is designed using SCS ❑ Evaluation of downstream adequacy provided(capacity methodologies,the 10 year design event rainfall depth must stability). he used. ❑ In locations where two on-grade catch basins are used,the TEIIPORARI'SEDIMENT BASINS • Nccnah curb opening calculator(or approved equal)shall be ❑ Temporary sediment basin provided or provisions for the used to vcriry that double catch basins are spaced use ufexisting City facilities. appropriately to maximize capture efficiency. El Sind to store 2•ycm,24-fir storm from the drainage area O All apron elevations(inlets and outlets)are Inbeled,Area below the outlet pipe(no smaller than 1800 cf%ncre tit' inlet,CB,IIH,elevations are labeled,Pipe sizes rind types drainage area),or sized nt 3,600 cr/acre of drainage area. are labeled. ❑ Designed to minimize short-circuiting. p 400'max.manhole spacing for lines 15"diameter or less. O gloating debris discharge is prevented. ❑ 500'max.manhole spacing fur lines 18"to 30"diameter. O Designed for hill dewalcring, ❑ Drainage from subdrains,Stump pumps,turd building storm ❑ Energy dissipation provided at outlet pipe. drains does not flow through public CB's. O Principal and emergency spillway designed per 13NIP storm ❑ Not more than 3 CI3's in a series(at tin intersection)before Irequency standards. connecting to the storm sewer main. O Fenced if slopes exceed 4:1 per City detail. ❑ Storm sewer main generally does not Ilot through CIV.S. ❑ Plan requires any permanent or temporary sediment ponds to ❑ Flow direction change.is 90 degrees al junctions. be constructed before other construction starts. ❑ Drainage does not cross intersections(no valley gutters). O For areas draining less than 10 acres provide alternative ❑ C13 spacing as necessary Ibr inlet capacity,curb spread,and sediment control(5 acres within I mile of impaired waters). not exceeding 1000'on residential streets or 000'on ❑ Ivitiltiple lines of sill fence. collector and artcrinl streets. ❑ Small basins O Apron inlets to the storm sewer include trash racks,per City O Vegetative strips(full permanent vegetation before requirements. upslope excavation). ❑ Trash racks on inlet structures in wooded areas designed assuming a minimum of 50%plugging condition. *As a reference document see III la t ip11 tidex1plip! tter/Wolet•t)pr •;rod-pIomlant>'.to III nv;tter(stlnn)s+ulu m,utacc lie Will)inne )I;I - stornmvutcr•nr<uwnl.huul ADDITIONAL.NOTES: • t • SINGI,L;RF.SIDrNTIAL 1,07' GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST Revised April 20I4 Key Site: 121=Yes 0=No Prepared Iiy: Date: Blank-Not Applicable Reviewed 13y: Date: GENERAL ❑ Grade 1'below top of fO nldation 10'from building. ❑ Completed grading permit application burnt, ❑ Drainage flows away from structures at min.2%. ❑ Owner nantc(s),email address,and addresses)listed on ❑ Freeboard to stnwtures.floor cl,or the grade adjacent to the Grading Plain. building ism least 1'above tiny overflow elevation,and at least 2' ❑ flan is 1"=50'or larger scale.North arrow shown. above any pond 100-year water level,whichever is greater and ❑ Plan is drawn in two-fool contours.All contours are min. I'above FEWIA flood el. labeled.Or many spot elev,and arrows alternative used. ❑ Minimum lot slopes for vegetated areas are 2%minimum. ❑ Existing contours sire dashed and proposed are solid. ❑ idnxinium unbroken 3:1 or steeper slope of 75 feet horizontal, ❑ Directional arrows are shown for proposed drainage. ❑ Temporary or permanent cover is indicated for all disturbed ❑ Details of terrain and drainage are provided for areas areas.'rempomry seeding specifics seed mix and includes disk adjacent to the proposed grading, anchored mulch on all slopes longer than 200'or>5%. ❑ Existing public and private utilities are shown. Permanent cover specifics 4"topsoil,seed mix and disk anchored ❑ Property limits are shown.Streets arc labeled,Lot& mulch,or 4"topsoil and sod. block information.Street address shown,if known. ❑ Slopes in excess of 4:1 and 4:1 slopes longer than 30'are seeded ❑ schedule of 13,ti11'installation shown. and protected with erosion control blankets or sodded and staked, ❑ 1.3N.11,details included. Blanket category specified per IMWDOT 3885.1. Plan depicts ❑ Concrete washout management and waste control 13M1) required blanket locutions. addressed on plan. ❑ Par sites where temporary or permanent cover will not be ❑ Per the NPDES Construction Storm Water Permit,the complete by November 15,plan indicates adequate measures to date and amount ofall rainfall events greater than'/,inch control spring erosion R sedimentation. in 24 hours must be documented. fUnrall amounts must be obtained from a properly maintained rain gauge DRAINAGE.SWA L ES& EAMNI ENTS installed oil site,a weather station within I mile of the ❑ Drainage and Utility casements are shown and labeled on the • site,or a weather reporting system that provides site plan. specific rainfall rainfall data from radar summaries. ❑ Drainage easements are provided where concentrated flow is received from more than I adjacent lot and also where SITE GRADING SE.DI,NIENTS, EROSION CONTROL concentrated flow is received from more than I screofad.jacem ❑ Down-slope sediment control scheduled before grading. property. 100-year flow in easement. ❑ Adjacent property protected from drainage and sediment. ❑ Minimum drainage casements for flows from I acre or less or 4 ❑ Stabilized vehicle exit(s)tire provided,minimize lots or less arc n minimum of 15'wide.Ditch is 1.9'deep V- number. shaped with 4: 1 slopes. ❑ All storm server inlets,existing and proposed,have inlet ❑ \•tiuitumn drainage casements for flows front more than I acre or protection/temporary sediment control that remains until more than 4 lots are a minimum of 20'wide. up-slope areas are stabilized. ❑ Ditch is a minimum of T deep with a 4'bottom and 4:1 slopes tip ❑ "Temporary stockpiles include nddilional sediment to file casement litre. 100-year rtmolYcontained in easement. control and temporary cover after 14 days(7 days if ❑ Iasentent documents are signed and submitted to Public Works discharging to and within I mile of an impaired water). With recording fee or included in plat. ❑ All exposed soil stabilized in 14 days. ❑ Control elevations for drainage ways are provided. ❑ Soils within I mile of impaired water stabilized within 7 ❑ Mininllnn slope of small drainage swales is 2%. days. ❑ Percent of slope is shown For drainage swales. ❑ Drainage casenems for flow from more than I acre or 4 lots arc ❑ rill R eft property line setbacks are>2'fir cut slope ht. seeded and protected with erosion control blanket or sodded. >I W or rill slope ht.>4'and setback is dimensioned on Blanket category specified per Mn/DOT 3885.1.Plan depicts the plans. required blanket locations. ❑ All proposed lot corner elevations are shown. ❑ Ditches within 200'of surface water or Property line stabilized in ❑ Proposed elevations of garage and lowest floor,ground 24 hrs after connection. al lions and rear of building,along with the structure type are indicated on the plan, ❑ Top of foundation is inin.G"above the ground, *As a reference document see http"wttw.P�u,aul�.,nun.us'itt�l.N,.lthh«,ai�r%tw;t�r•t��e_;m i_prt!inm arrnrw;t.r%;tnrntttntcr-ntanattent ntr'ntinnesotaw-sturtn%t:drr- nunurll.huul _ ADDITIONAL.NOTES: • iC/�/ - Al • RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, Minnesota: That the City Clerk of said City is hereby authorized and directed to advertise for sealed bids for City Project No. M13-43, J7805, Public Infrastructure to Support Fire Station #2 in accordance with the specifications on file in the City Clerk's Office. Such proposals, which must be on a form of proposal prepared by the City will be received by the City Clerk until: May 14, 2014 at 11:00 am, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City Hall by the City Clerk, and two designated City Officials. The proposals will then be tabulated and presented for consideration by the Common Council at the next appropriate meeting. The plans, specifications and proposal forms are hereby approved. Passed and adopted by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, Minnesota, on this 21 st day of April, 2014. Ire President of s id Common Council • Attest: City Clerk Approved this 22"`' day of April, 2014. Mayor of said City (Seal of the City of Rochester,Minnesota) • RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that the City enter into a professional services agreement with Buildings Consulting Group, Inc., to perform a condition survey of Third Street (J2583) and Civic Center (J2578) Parking Ramps in the amounts of$6,750 and $7,500, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council authorize City staff to negotiate an additional fee with BCG for the inspection of the elevator equipment. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute this agreement on behalf of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS -"I DAY OF -t,r` ( _, 2014. • PRESIDENT O SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2014. y MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Res 10\ProfSer08CG.03 cm RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that the Comprehensive Traffic and Parking Resolution, previously adopted and amended by the Common Council be amended in the following respects: I. Amend paragraph 13 of Section I, Zone E, "90 Minute Meters" so as to read as follows: (13) Second Street S.W., on the north side from approximately mid-block west to 131h Avenue, meters #122-32 to #122-33. II. Amend paragraph 25 of Section I, Zone E, "90 Minute Meters" so as to read as follows: (25) Thirteenth Avenue S.W., in the 100 block on the west side from First Street S.W., four spaces #123-0 through #123-4, and on the east side in the 100 block, spaces ##122-50 through ##122-57. III. Delete paragraph 36 of Section E, "Passenger Loading Zones." IV. Delete paragraph 3.65 of Section J, "Passenger and Commodity Loading Zones." PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY _� 12014, PR SIDENT O SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST:/~ CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS r DAY OF [_*0 , 2014. MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) ResMPMParking.12 • RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that the City enter into a professional services agreement with TSP, Inc., to conduct a study to explore energy efficiencies that can be gained beyond those currently outlined in the Recreation Center/Senior Center expansion project. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute this agreement on behalf of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCt-IESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY „` 2014. PRESIDENT 'F AID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST: ] 1. CITY CLERK • APPROVED THIS DAY OF JC-�' 12014, MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Res 101Pro1Serv17SP.08 • • RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that, pursuant to R.C.O. §64.160, subd. 2(J), the fee for boulevard trees and installation shall be established at $259,00 per tree. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY O ; w rI , 2014. PR SIDENT SAID CO MON COUNCIL ATTEST:/ -� = ' CITY CLERK ,� f APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2014. • MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Res 101Adcpt.FeeTree14 • VV • IZESOLM ION WHEREAS, pursuant to on advertisement for bids for the following inlprovcmcnl(s): 3115 I-lot Mix Asphhalt Overlay Street Rehabilitation bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Rochester Sand & Gravel-$1,347,086,7,1; and, WHEREAS, it appears that Rochester Sand & Gravel of Minnesotn is tile, lowest responsive and responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, Minnesota: (1)'I'llat the bid of 1,347,080.74 is hereby accepted and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the standard City contract For ConsUvction with Rochester Sand & Gravel of Minnesolti in the name of the City of Rochester for the following local improvenlent(s): 3115 Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay Street Rehabilitation according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the Common Council and oil rile in the office of the City Clerk. (2)The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits nlitde whit their bids,except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a Contract has been executed. All contracts shall be executed by the bidder within ten days after the contract is ready for his signature, and it' not executed by him in said time, he shall be deemed to have abandoned the same. PASSED AND ADO11TED 13Y THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA,THIS 21s' DAY OF APRIL,2014. PRE.SIDE;NT OF 'AID COMMON COUNCIL. A1'TES"I'. . CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS 22"`i DAY 01' APItII,__,, 2014 MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) • Rh.SOLUTION WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the following improven)ent(s): Aggregate Season Supply 2014 bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law,and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: See Attached; and, WHEREAS, it appears that Various Suppliers of Minnesota and Wisconsin is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, Minnesota: (1)That tl)e bid of as show above is hereby accepted and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the standard City contract for construction with Various Suppliers of Minnesota and Wisconsin in tale name of the City of Rochester for the following local improvemca)1(s): Aggregate Seasolr Sttl)l)ly 201,1 according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the Common Council and on file in the office of,the City Clerk. (2)The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids,except that the deposits ofthe successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained unlit a contract has been executed, All contracts shall be executed by the bidder within ten days after the contract is ready for his signature, and if' not executed by him in said time, he shall be deemed to have abandoned the same. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF'THE CITY Ol'ROCHESTER, • MINNESOTA,THIS 21" DAY OF APIZIL, 2014. /? PRESIU'NT O1:, AID COMMON COUNCIL, ATTEST:Z_ ..�-- CITY CLERK APPROVED TI[IS 22"" DAY 01' APIZIL__, 20111 MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester,Minnesota) • s � � Project Number:2014-Aggr Project Title or Road Number.Aggregate Season Supply 2014 resser Engineer Milestone Leitzen Decoart1Q Rochester r Trap Estimate Materials Concrete Sand& Asphalt Construe Trap Summary Sartd& tion Co. Rock Inc- line Item No. IDescription Units Base Bid lQuantity Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price JUnit Price Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price 2014 1 STREET(350) WASHED SAND 1 2105.609/10010 FREIGHT ON BOARD TON Base Bid 1.00 S5.00 S6.851 S6.50 S5.201 S5.50 S5.20 WASHED SAND 2 2105.609110011 (DELIVERED) TON Base Bid 1.00 S9.00 S10.60 S9.00 511.00 S9.00 PIT RUN(FREIGHT ON 3 2105.609110020 BOARD) TON Base Bid 1.00 $4.50 S5.50 ( S4.75 S4.50 $4.50 4 2105.609110021 PIT RUN(DELIVERED) TON Base Bid 1.00 $8.00 $9.25 1 S9.00 S9.50 S9.00 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 2(FREIGHT ON I 5 2211.501/10020 BOARD) Bid 1.00 S6.25 S6.50 S6.50 AGGREGATE BASE 6 2211.501120020 CLASS 2(DELIVERED)fTON Base Bid 1_00 S10.50 $11.25 S11.25 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE(FA-2) 7 2356.507/10025 (FREIGHT ON BOARD) TON Base Bid 1.00 S26.00 S15.95 S8.95 S30.00 S8.95 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE(FA-2) 8 2356.507/10026 (DELIVERED) TON Base Bid 1.00 S33.00 S21.50 S21.40 S54.50 S21.40 r1aL A AGGREGATE(FA-2 112)(FREIGHT ON 9 2356.5 0 711 0 02 7 BOARD) TON Base Bid 1.00 S28.00 S15.95 $24.15 S15.95 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE(FA-2 10 2356.507/10028 12)(DELIVERED) TON Base Bid 1.00 S34.00 S21.501 I S48.65 S21.50 SEAL GOAT AGGREGATE(FA-3) 11 2356.507/10029 (FREIGHT ON BOARD) TON Base Bid 1.00 S27.00 $15.95 I S24.15 S15.95 SEAL WA I AGGREGATE(FA-3) 12 2356 507/10030I(DELIVERED) TON!Base Bid 1.00 S32.00 $21.50 S48.65 S21.50 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE(FA-3 1/2)(FREIGHT ON 13 2356.507/10031 BOARD) TON Base Bid 1.00 S26.00 $15.95 S22.60 S15.95 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE(FA-3 14 2356.507110032 12)(DELIVERED) TON Base Bid 1.00 S30.00 S21.50 S47.10 S21.50 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS II(FREIGHT ON 15 2511.502/10012 BOARD) TON Base Bid 1.00 S13.00 S12.50 S12.50 RANDOM RIPRAP 16 2511.5C220u^12 CLASS 11!CELIVERED)ITCH lBase Bid i.00 S17.00 S17-501 S17.50 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Gus Chafolius/Titan Development ("Applicant") applied for a Type III, Phase II Incentive Development Preliminary Plan (#R2014-003CUP) to permit the construction of a 24- story mixed use building consisting of office, retail, restaurants, hotel, apartments, and a public parking structure. The properties are located along the south side of East Center Street along the east side of South Broadway, and north of the Broadway Residences and Suites by Bridge Street; and, WHEREAS, the legal description for the properties affected by the application is as follows: Lot 7, Block 33 (Parcel 743544017933) North Half of Lot 8, Block 33 (Parcel 743544017935) South Half of Lot 8, Block 33 (Parcel 743544017934) North Half of Lot 9, Block 33 (Parcel 743544017937) South Half of Lot 9, Block 33 (Parcel 743544017936) All in the Original Plat of the City of Rochester, Section 35, Township 107, Range • 14; and, WHEREAS, the project is being proposed through the Incentive Development Conditional use Permit process because the development exceeds the permitted floor area ratio in the CDC- CBD zoning district; and, WHEREAS, R.C.O. §62.630 sets forth the criteria for incentive developments; and, WHEREAS, based upon section 62.630, the Planning Department recommended the following findings of fact as to the Incentive Development application: Preliminary Development Plan Criteria: A. Suitability of the Area: The proposed site is suitable as the location for an Incentive Development. The proposed use should be compatible with the existing land uses in the area. B. Site Design Criteria: (1) Capacity of Public Facilities: Utilities exist adjacent to this project. Sorne utilities will need to be modified (i.e. water and electric) to accommodate this development. The applicant will need to coordinate these modifications or improvements with the appropriate agencies. • (2) Geologic Hazards: Not applicable. (3) Natural Features: Not applicable. (4) Traffic Generation Impact: The applicant will need to work with the City to resolve issues related to specific development obligations related to on street parking, the existing alley, and the proposed parking ramp prior to submitting the Final Development Plan application. (5) Height Impacts: This project proposes 24 floors with a total building height of approximately 315 feet. Due to the unique "L" shape design of this building, shadows will be minimized. The structure is not expected to destroy views from the primary exposures of nearby residential dwelling units. (6) Setbacks: The provisions for the CDC-CBD Zoning District don't require setbacks, Through the Incentive Development application, the applicant is requesting to exceed the floor area ratio allowed in the CDC-CBD. " (7) Internal Site Design: This project is designed to orient retail and restaurant uses on the first two floors toward Broadway and Center Street. The building is setback from the west and south property lines starting at the third floor to the top of the building. (8) Screening and Buffering: Residential units are designed to incorporate private outdoor spaces and individual unit privacy by incorporating private outdoor spaces and tall windows. (9) Ordinance Requirements: The applicant will need to submit revised scaled plans showing compliance with the size requirements for parking areas and drive aisle within the underground parking structure once the details of the Public Parking Ramp are worked out. An application for an Alley Vacation is also required to vacate the public alley on the east side of the building. Also, through the Incentive Development application, the applicant is requesting to exceed the floor area ratio allowed in the CDC-CBD. (10) Non-Vehicular and Alternate Modes of Travel: The proposed development incorporates pedestrian oriented space by having store front restaurant and retail glass store fronts to allow for a sense of openness with convenient pedestrian access. This project " 2 is proposed within '/4 mile of an existing bus shelter. (11) Properties located in planning area for which a detailed Master Plan has been adopted by the Council. The proposed development is consistent with the Downtown Mater Plan by incorporating pedestrian oriented amenities like connectivity to the Skyway system and incorporating a mix of uses like retail, restaurant, hotel, and living quarters within the building contributing to a more active downtown; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department recommended the following conditions of approval if the Incentive Development application were approved: 1. The Final Development Plan application shall include: A. Revised building elevations that identify dimensions, building materials, colors and type of glass; B. Additional details for the canopies and awnings, including materials, colors and elevations; C. Details for exterior lighting on the building and in the right-of-way; D. Additional details for the streetscape, including plantings, materials, colors and elevations; E. A sign plan, if signs will be proposed; for the ground floor and Skyway level tenants; F. Additional detail for the decks and terraces, including materials, colors and conformance with the Building Code; G. Revised building and site plans that identify recessed doors, final location for the Broadway skyway system, location of the loading dock, and trash compactor and transformer; and H. A shadow impact diagram showing any shadowing effects on adjacent property; 2. The Development is contingent on vacating the alley to the east, therefore an Alley Vacation petition is required. 3. Revocable Permits will be required for all canopies, overhangs, and any other infringements over the right-of-way. 4. Grading and Drainage Plan approval is required for this application. 3 5. The condition of existing pedestrian facilities, curb & gutter will be reviewed by Public Works staff and any needed panel repair and or replacement work shall be completed concurrent with development. 6. Construction / reconstruction of any public infrastructure associated with this redevelopment will require City approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 7. Redevelopment of this property may be subject to a Plant Investment Fee (PIF) for any incremental difference between the existing and proposed water meter for the domestic service. Any applicable PIF will be calculated and collected through the Building Permit review and approval process. 8. Specific development obligations related to on street parking, the existing alley, proposed parking ramp, extension and / or relocation of public utilities, access to public roadways, etc, will be addressed as part of a Development Assistance Agreement that will be prepared and processed by City Administration staff. 9. An adequate water supply shall be provided for fire protection including hydrants properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water Division. 10. Final Fire Department approval of this project will require full compliance with the building and fire codes for a mixed residential and commercial use high-rise building. 11. The applicant shall comply with Section 63.265, subd. 8, related to Boulevard Tree Requirements. 12. The property shall be re-platted into one lot through the platting process; and, WHEREAS, on March 26, 2014, the Rochester Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this Incentive Development Preliminary Plan, reviewed the application according to the requirements of section 62.630, adopted the Planning Department's recommended findings of fact, and recommended approval of the application subject to the Planning Department's recommended 12 conditions; and, WHEREAS, on April 21, 2014, the Common Council held a public hearing on the Incentive Development Preliminary Plan (#R2014-003CUP) and gave all interested persons the opportunity to make presentations and give testimony concerning the application; and, WHEREAS, at the April 21st public hearing, the Planning Department staff indicated that revised plans were submitted on April 14, 2014, which satisfied nearly all of condition #1. The Planning Department staff recommended the amendment of condition #1 to read as follows: 4 1. The Final Development Plan application shall include additional details for the streetscape, including plantings, materials, colors, and elevations to add at a minimum one car length mid-block curb extension along the north side approximately located between the west and east lots of the block; and, WHEREAS, at the April 21" public hearing, the applicant's representative agreed with all of the Commission recommended conditions of approval including the proposed amendment of condition #1; and, WHEREAS, based upon all of the evidence and testimony submitted during the April 21" public hearing, the Council accepts the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended findings of fact and conditions of approval except for condition#1, which the Council amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that it adopt the Planning and Zoning Commission's findings of fact and that the Incentive Development Preliminary Plan (#R2014-003CUP) requested by Gus Chafolius/Titan Development is granted subject to the above 12 conditions as amended above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City not waive the Final Plan Review for this application. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE /COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS I DAY OF � , 2014. PRESIDENT F SAID COMMON COUNCIL. ATTEST: ' �'• P --- CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS Q- c) DAY OF ��' 12014, MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Zone 10V ncendev,14.003,prelim 5 • 152-14 E8 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Oak Ventures of Rochester, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability corporation has shown to the satisfaction of the City of Rochester Common Council that it has complied with all conditions of approval imposed upon its Land Subdivision Permit(Final Plat) and all applicable laws and ordinances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, Minnesota,that after a hearing duly noticed and held on April 21, 2014, the following plat of lands in Olmsted County, Minnesota are to be known and designated as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, and part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, all in Section 29,Township 107 North, Range 13 West, Olmsted County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Outlot A, SHANNON OAKS THIRD SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof on file at the County Recorder's office, Olmsted County, Minnesota;thence southerly 179 degrees 26 minutes 43 seconds azimuth along the easterly line of said Outlot A 235.44 feet; thence southerly 164 degrees 57 minutes 11 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 351.39 feet;thence northeasterly 62 degrees 53 minutes 11 seconds • azimuth along said easterly line 197.63 feet; thence southeasterly 152 degrees 53 minutes 11 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 20.00 feet; thence southwesterly 242 degrees 53 minutes 11 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 176.73 feet; thence southwesterly 216 degrees 43 minutes 54 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 49.77 feet; thence southerly 182 degrees 26 minutes 02 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 298.94 feet; thence southeasterly 144 degrees 34 minutes 34 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 177.62 feet; thence southerly 159 degrees 12 minutes 12 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 356.85 feet; thence southeasterly 133 degrees 55 minutes 43 seconds azimuth along said easterly line 162.50 feet to the westerly line of Block 2 of said SHANNON OAKS THIRD SUBDIVISION; thence northeasterly 43 degrees 55 minutes 43 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 168.51 feet; thence northeasterly 28 degrees 49 minutes 35 seconds azimuth along the westerly line of said SHANNON OAKS THIRD SUBDIVISION 56.00 feet; thence southeasterly along the northerly right-of-way line of Kerry Drive N.E. 22.80 feet on a nontangential curve concave northeasterly, having a radius of 172.00 feet, a central angle of 07 degrees 35 minute 43 seconds and a chord azimuth of 115 degrees 01 minute 43 seconds; thence easterly 111 degrees 13 minutes 52 seconds azimuth along said northerly right-of-way line 13.63 feet to the westerly line of Block 1 of said SHANNON OAKS THIRD SUBDIVISION; thence northerly 20 degrees 06 minutes 37 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 394.37 feet; thence northerly 351 degrees 55 minutes 01 second azimuth along said westerly line 262.72 feet; thence northwesterly 326 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 227.05 feet; thence northwesterly 329 degrees 43 minutes 40 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 190.29 feet; thence northerly 352 degrees 40 minutes 36 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 230.90feet; thence northerly 17 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 99.81 feet; thence northeasterly 30 degrees 12 minutes 34 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 216.35 feet; thence northerly 09 degrees 09 minutes 24 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 90.77 feet; thence northerly 344 degrees 08 minutes 02 seconds • azimuth along said westerly line 135.14 feet; thence northwesterly 313 degrees 55 minutes 43 seconds azimuth along said westerly line 95.93 feet to the most southerly corner of Lot 3, Block 4, SHANNON OAKS FIRST SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof on file at the County t,lsnonwa]tryn A110 aids 30 aOAVN 'I'wz` jt.i d 3O AVG PUZZ SIH1 a3n0UddV NZ13'10,UIO :1S31LV =i v IIONnOO NOWW00 G1HS 1N301SMJd f &17 0 '17IOZ' j? dV—d0 J.dl7 --79= SIHl 'dlOS3NNIW '�13-MHO02J 30 A113 3H1 30 1IONnOO NOWW00 3H1 AB a3ldOCIV ONd 03SSVd •pajdaooe Agajaq aie jeld pies uo umogs se sasodmd ollgnd jol puel ul sisaia}ul jo puel jo suoljeolpap Ile pue panoidde Agajaq sl pue 'jo6e6}jow pue jaumo 'uoljejodjoo AT Ilgell pallwll ejosauww e '0-11 `jajsayooH jo sainjuan NeO Aq palllwgns 'NOISIAlcienS HlJlJ SNVO NONNVHS 'Sd NMONA 88 Ol •ssal Jo avow sWoe 69•61, suleluoo Mil pleS •6uluul6aq jo julod aqj of 1a91 bL•gb y jollnO pies jo aull gjnos aqj 6uole gjnwlze spuooas g 6 salnulw CO s9aJ69p 69Z Alialsam aouagl :y jollnO pies jo jaLuoo iseaglnos 9y1 0119910 VL6 6 aull Alialsea pies 6uole gjnwlze spuooas 90 salnulw Lg saaj6ap LLl, Aljeglnos aouay} 'NOISIAIGGnS 1Sb18 SAVO NONNVH* S pies jo y jolln0 jo aull Alialsea eqj of jaa}LV996 aull Aljaglnos pies 6uole gjnwlze spuooas ZE salnulw b6 saaj6ap 99Z Apalsom aouayj '1GGJ 1�9•96 awl Aljaglnos pies 6uole gjnwlze spuooas 66 salnulw CZ saw6ap gl.Z AIjajs9mgjnos aouagj 'jaaj L17'Eg aull Apaglnos ples 6uole gjnwlze spuooas 6 L salnulw £Z saaAep 90E AIja}samgy jou aouagj:1991 OO.99 cull Aljeglnos pies 6uole gjnwlze spuooas 61, sa}nulw EZ saw6ap gl,Z Alia}semglnos eouagj :jaa1 �L'666 NOISIAlcianS isHl=l SAVO NONNVHS pies jo aull Aljaglnos aqj 6uole gjnwlze spuooas gg salnulw £g saw6ap gZZ Aljalsemglnos aouagj 'ejosauulW '�4unoO palsw10 'aoWo s,JapJ000H 63 bT-ZST • RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that the City approve of and execute a Joint Powers Agreement with High Forest Township, Olmsted County, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation outlining the roles and responsibilities of each respective jurisdiction/agency in the administration of Official Map #18. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute this agreement on behalf of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY OF 0' , 2014. PRESIDENT 0 SAID COMMON COUNCIL 7 1 ATTEST: CITY CLERK • APPROVED THIS DAY OF - r,t 1 , 2014. 41 MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Res IOlExeculeAgA01m23 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that the City approve of and execute a Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation with Cascade Township for a part of Cascade Township that includes properties in the TH 52/75t" Street N.W., vicinity. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute the Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation on behalf of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS 0.N I DAY OF fir= 2014. PRESIDENT SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS DAY OF c , 2014. 1&64a�� MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Res I01ExecuteAgr10AA1