Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 501-14 501-14 F3 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Madonna Towers of Rochester requested an amendment to the Planned Unit Development for Madonna Towers to add a 16-unit assisted living facility on the property. The facility would be one story and approximately 12,000 square feet. The property is located along the south side of 41st Street N.W., and along the west side of 19th Avenue N.W., in Rochester, Minnesota. The proposed facility would be located in the southeast corner of the property; and, WHEREAS, the City Planning and Zoning Commission, at its October 22, 2014, meeting reviewed the proposed amendment in light of the criteria provided by section 62.708 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances and made the following findings of fact: 62.708 Criteria for Type III Developments: In determining whether to approve, deny, or approve with conditions an application, the Commission and Council shall be guided by the following criteria: 1) Preliminary Development Plan Criteria: a) Capacity of Public Facilities: The existing or future planned utilities in the area are adequate to serve the proposed development. Construction plans, conforming to standard City • of Rochester requirements, will need to be reviewed and approved by the City. Specific plans for utility extension or connection will need to be approved at a future time. If the extension of public watermain, and/or the addition of hydrant(s) is required for this project, then execution of a City- Owner Contract, and dedication of an applicable public utility easement, will be required prior to construction. b) Geologic Hazards: The existence of areas of natural or geologic hazard, such as unstable slopes, sinkholes, floodplain, etc., have been identified and the development of these areas has been taken into account or will be addressed in the Phase II plans. This site is not known to contain any of the listed geologic hazards. c) Natural Features: For developments involving new construction, the arrangement of buildings, paved areas and open space has, to the extent practical, utilized the existing topography and existing desirable vegetation of the site. This site is relatively level. The proposed additions will eliminate some existing landscaping, including trees and planting area, but new landscape area will be created as well as new sidewalk connections. • 1 501-14 F3 d) Residential Traffic Impact: When located in a residential area, the proposed development: 1) Will not cause traffic volumes to exceed planned capacities on local residential streets; 2) Will not generate frequent truck traffic on local residential streets; 3) Will not create additional traffic during evening and nighttime hours on local residential streets; a) The proposed amendment will not cause traffic volumes to exceed planned capacities on local residential streets. b) This proposal will not generate frequent truck traffic on local residential streets. c) The proposal will likely not create a substantial amount of traffic curing evening and nighttime hours on local residential streets. • e) Traffic Generation Impact: Anticipated traffic generated by the development will not cause the capacity of adjacent streets to be exceeded, and conceptual improvements to reduce the impact of access points on the traffic flow of adjacent streets have been identified where needed. The anticipated traffic generated by the development should not cause the capacity of the adjacent streets to be exceeded. f) Height Impacts: For developments involving new construction, the heights and placement of proposed structures are compatible with the surrounding development. Factors to consider include: 1) Will the structure block sunlight from reaching adjacent properties during a majority of the day for over four (4) months out of the year; 2) Will siting of the structure substantially block vistas from the primary exposures of adjacent residential dwellings created due to differences in elevation. is 2 501-14 F3 The height of the structure will not block sunlight from the adjacent properties. This addition is planned to be one story. g) Setbacks: For developments involving new construction, proposed setbacks are related to building height and bulk in a manner consistent with that required for permitted uses in the underlying zoning district. The setbacks exceed those which would be required for a congregate housing or nursing/personal care facility developed in the R-4 district. At the closest point the structure is setback approximately 38 feet from the property line. h) Internal Site Design: For developments involving new construction, the preliminary site layout indicates adequate building separation and desirable orientation of the buildings to open spaces, street frontages or other focal points. The building orientation allows for the connection of interior sidewalks that connect to the various buildings on the property. i) Screening and Buffering: The conceptual screening and bufferyards proposed are adequate to protect the privacy of • residents in the development or surrounding residential areas from the impact of interior traffic circulation and parking areas, utility areas such as refuse storage, noise or glare exceeding permissible standards, potential safety hazards, unwanted pedestrian/bicycle access, or to subdue differences in architecture and bulk between adjacent land uses. There is an area of mature trees located to the west and northwest that will buffer the proposed addition from the adjacent residential uses to the west. j) Ordinance Requirements: The proposed development includes adequate amounts of off-street parking and loading areas and, in the case of new construction, there is adequate landscaped area to meet ordinance requirements. This application for 16 additional residential units increases the units of residential beds available by 16. The zoning ordinance requires one parking space per every six beds plus one space for employee on the largest shift. Five parking spaces were added in 2011 as part of the development. Plus additional parking spaces (seven) were constructed in 2010. There is a total of 117 parking spaces (not including the garage units). 36 parking spaces are required based on the number of units, which leaves a balance of 81 parking spaces for staff. The Landscape Percentage has . 3 501-14 F3 never been more than 22.6 percent on this site as part of the PUD. This proposal shows a Landscape area of 18 percent, which is a .3 percent increase from the last approved amendment. k) General Compatibility: The relationship of the actual appearance, general density and overall site design of the proposed development should be compared to the established pattern of zoning, the character of the surrounding neighborhood and the existing land forms of the area to determine the general compatibility of the development with its surroundings. The proposed development would appear to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. The land use of the site is a mixture of assisted living, nursing home care and independent living units. The proposed project would be buffered and screened on the north and west sides by the existing vegetation and buildings. 1) Non-Vehicular and Alternate Modes of Travel: The proposed development incorporates pedestrian oriented-space, provides direct and convenient pedestrian access to the building entrance(s) • from public trails, public sidewalks, and on or off-site parking areas, incorporates appropriated pedestrian safety features, provides convenient pedestrian access for transit patrons, or, if appropriate, access for transit vehicles, and provides adequate bicycle access. Consideration shall also be given, to providing designated motorized scooter parking if appropriate to the context of the development (the use, location, type of individuals served). The overall site provides a series of sidewalk that connect the buildings and provides access from the parking area and public sidewalks to the various buildings on the property;a nd, WHEREAS, the Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment of the PUD subject to the following conditions: 1. Grading and drainage plan approval is required for the project, as well as payment of any applicable Storm Water Management Area Charge for any net increase in impervious surface for the proposed project. 2. If the extension of public watermain, and/or the addition of hydrant(s) is required for this project, then execution of a City-Owner Contract, and dedication of an applicable public utility easement, will be required prior to construction. 3. The owner is responsible all cost associated with the relocation of existing . 4 501-14 F3 utilities necessary to be moved to allow of the proposed additions. 4. Boulevard trees are required for the development. A Tree Planting Plan shall be approved by the City Forester. The applicant shall submit a tree planting plan and request a planting permit from the City Forester. The boulevard trees shall be installed concurrent with the construction of the additions at a density of 1 per 35 feet; and, WHEREAS, the Common Council, at its November 3, 2014, meeting, considered the matter and otherwise concurred with the Commission's findings and recommendation, and adopted them as its own. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Common Council of the City of Rochester that applicant's proposed amendment to the Planned Unit Development for Madonna Towers to add a 16-unit assisted living facility on the property. The facility would be one story and approximately 12,000 square feet is in all things approved subject to the above four conditions. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS 3rd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014. PRESIDENT qF- SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST. /-4'111 CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS 4th DAY OF _.....NOVEMBER.. 2014, MAYOR OF SAID CITY atc rr r,arrw tirl,tit{, Zone?OTUD.amendMadTowers02 5