Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 106-11 • RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Rochester Sand and Gravel Division of Mathy Construction applied for a renewal of its Type III, Phase II, Restricted Development Conditional Use Permit #05-06 to permit the establishment of a hot mix asphalt facility on property located east of T.H. 63, south of 60t" Street South and northeasterly of Machinery Hill within the Quarve Quarry Pit; and, WHEREAS, since a hot mix asphalt facility is not a permitted use in this zoning district, the Applicant has proposed the development by way of the restricted development provisions; and, WHEREAS, R.C.O. §62.700 recognizes that certain land uses which are generally not allowed within a given zoning district can, if regulated, "serve both the public interest and allow a more equitable balancing of private interests than that achieved by strict adherence to standard zoning regulations;" and, WHEREAS, this application is being processed as an amendment to a Restricted Development Final Plan following the Type III, Phase III procedure with a hearing before the Planning Commission and a hearing before the Council; and, WHEREAS, R.C.O. § 62.708 (Criteria for Type III Developments) provides the relevant criteria for the review of this application; and, • WHEREAS, the Planning Department applied the criteria found at section 62.708 to this application and prepared the following findings of fact: 1) Preliminary Development Plan Criteria: a) Capacity of Public Facilities: The proposed hot mix asphalt (HMA) facility will not result in a need for sanitary sewer or water facilities on-site. Electrical power needed for the facility is available. b) Geologic Hazards: There are no known geologic hazards on the property. c) Natural Features: The HMA site is proposed to be located on the existing quarry floor. There are no unique natural features on the property that have been identified. d) Residential Traffic Impact: Access to this property will be primarily from the north TH 63 quarry access. This access utilizes the existing frontage road access which is across from the 60" St. • 1 SW access on TH 63. The frontage road also has a south access. Secondary access to the property would be from the east side of the Quarry, at St. Bridget Road/CR 20. There should be no impact to residential roadways as a result of this application. Following the 2003 approval of a conditional use permit for a HMA plant at this location, the applicant paved both accesses. e) Traffic Generation Impact: At this time, no road authority has indicated a concern that anticipated traffic would cause the capacity of the adjacent streets to be exceeded. MnDOT's referral finds the traffic impact acceptable. MnDOT points out that US 63 is classified as a Medium-Priority Interregional Corridor which is planned to transition to a freeway facility in the future. This transition would include closures of at-grade intersections, including the 60th Street access to US 63. f) Height Impacts: This site does offer some unique opportunities for buffering and screening. The height of the quarry wall directly west of the proposed site is approximately 100 feet. To the north of the HMA site, the quarry wall drops to approximately 70 feet. Additionally, an existing row of mature evergreen trees exists along a portion of the west property boundary, between the north TH 63 entrance (across from the 60th St. intersection with TH 63) and Machinery Hill. Due to topography and design of the quarry it appears the HMA site would be most visible from the east (i.e. east of St. Bridget Road/CR 20). From the west, the visible portion of the HMA site would be the extended bag-house stack, which is proposed to be approximately 160 feet above the quarry floor. Approximately the upper 60 feet would be visible from the west. g) Setbacks: The HMA plant site is approximately 800 to 900 feet from the west property boundary. Setbacks from the north, west and south property boundaries would be more than mile. h) Internal Site Design: A layout of the proposed HMA plant is included in the application materials. From the HMA site, access will be available either to the east to St. Bridget Road/CR 20 or to the TH 63 accesses to the Quarry. The primary access is planned to be the north TH 63 access, which is located at the intersection of TH 63 and the 60th St. SW and east Frontage Road. i) Screening and Buffering: This site does offer some unique opportunities for buffering and screening. The height of the quarry • 2 wall directly west of the proposed site is approximately 100 feet. To the north of the HMA site, the quarry wall drops to approximately 70 feet. Additionally, an existing row of mature evergreen trees exists along a portion of the west property boundary, between the north TH 63 entrance (across from the 60t St. intersection with TH 63) and Machinery Hill. Due to topography and design of the quarry it appears the HMA site would be most visible from the east (i.e. east of St. Bridget Road/CR 20). From the west, the visible portion of the HMA site would be extended bag- house stack, which is proposed to be approximately 160 feet above the quarry floor. Approximately the upper 60 feet would be visible from the west. j) Ordinance Requirements: There should be adequate room on-site for employee parking and internal circulation of truck traffic. This use will be subject to meeting the Industrial Performance Standards of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual (Sec. 63.600 et. seq.). k) General Compatibility: The site is separated from adjacent residential uses to the west by the quarry wall and the right of way of TH 63, so that the nearest house is roughly 1,400 feet away. The bag-house was increased in height in order increase dispersion of emissions and thereby . to reduce the effects of the HMA to surrounding neighbors. Approximately the upper 60' would be visible from the west. This applicant is again proposing to use an odor mask in the mix to neutralize and minimize odor from the plant. Additionally, this use will be subject to meeting the Industrial Performance Standards of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual (Sec. 63.600 et. seq.). It has been the experience of the Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department that existing hot mix asphalt facilities in the County have not generated a history of complaints related to noise, odor or dust. During the operation of their previous CUP, there were complaints from neighbors to the west about odors and emissions from the HMA plant, however. 1) Non-Vehicular and Alternate Modes of Travel: The proposed development isn't pedestrian oriented since this is the business in which pedestrians would not be walking to. The business serves trucks which are hauling bituminous. The plant is located within an active quarry where heavy machinery operates and pedestrian traffic would be in conflict with the operation of the quarry. 3 2) Final Development Plan Criteria: a) Public Facility Design: The proposed hot mix asphalt (HMA) facility will not result in a need for sanitary sewer or water facilities on-site. Electrical power needed for the facility is available. b) Geologic Hazards: There are no known geologic hazards on the property. c) Access Effect: Access to this property will be primarily from the north TH 63 quarry access. This access utilizes the existing frontage road access which is across from the 60th Street S.W., access on TH 63. The frontage road also has a south access. Secondary access to the property would be from the east side of the Quarry at St. Bridget Road/CR 20. There should be no impact to residential roadways as a result of this application. Following the 2003 approval of a CUP for an HMA plant at this location, the applicant paved both accesses. d) Pedestrian Circulation: Pedestrian facilities and pedestrian circulation should not be impacted by this proposal. e) Foundation and Site Plantings: This plant is not a permanent structure and the HMA site sits on the floor of the quarry below grade and out of view from most of the surrounding area (except for silos and stack). Foundation plantings would not be needed nor reasonable considering the use and visibility of plantings that would be located near the equipment site. f) Site Status: This criterion is not applicable to this project. g) Screening and Bufferyards: This site offers unique opportunities for buffering and screening. The height of the quarry wall directly west of the proposed site is approximately 100 feet. To the north of the HMA site, the quarry wall drops to approximately 70 feet. Additionally, an existing row of mature evergreen trees exists along a portion of the west property boundary, between the north TH 63 entrance (across from the 60th Street intersection with TH 63) and Machinery Hill. Due to topography and design of the quarry, it appears the HMA site would be most visible from the east (i.e., east of St. Bridget Road/CR 20). From the west, the visible portion of the HMA site would be the extended bag-house stack, which is approximately 160 feet above the quarry floor. Approximately, the • 4 • upper 60 feet would be visible from the west. h) Final Building Design: The final/proposed design approved in 2005 would include increasing the height of the existing stack from 130 feet above the quarry floor to 160 feet above the quarry floor. i) Internal Circulation Areas: Internal loading and circulation patterns and site access are not proposed to change from the previous approvals. j) Ordinance Requirements: There should be adequate room on-site for employee parking and internal circulation of truck traffic. This use will be subject to meeting the Industrial Performance Standards of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual (Sec. 63.600 et. seq.). k) Non-Vehicular and Alternate Modes of Travel: The proposed development isn't pedestrian oriented since this is the business in which pedestrians would not be walking to. The business serves trucks which are hauling bituminous. The plant is located within an active quarry where heavy machinery and pedestrian traffic would be in conflict with the operation of the quarry; and, • WHEREAS, the Planning Department also reviewed the application using the provisions of R.C.O. §61.146. Section 61.146 states that a development permit authorizing a conditional use must be approved unless one or more of the eight stated findings can be made with respect to the proposed development. The Planning Department concluded none of the eight findings could be made as to this proposed development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the Final Plan subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: 1. Import of materials for processing shall be limited only to that necessary for the hot mix asphalt facility. 2. This use will be subject to meeting the Industrial Performance Standards of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual (Section 63.600, et. Seq.) including the standard applying to odor in the M-1 and M- 2 districts. 3. No temporary use permit may be issued without Council's approval. 4. This permit shall expire at a time determined by the Council. The applicant must go through a Type III, Phase II process in order to renew • 5 • the permit. 5. Monitoring will be required 24 hours a day, seven days a week, during one month prior to startup of plant operation and during any month the plant is in operation. The monitoring device for fumes must be placed according to MPCA recommendations; and, WHEREAS, on January 26, 2011, the Rochester Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this restricted development preliminary plan, reviewed the application according to the requirements of Section 62.708, adopted the Planning Department staffs recommended findings of fact a xcept as to compatibility, and recommended denial of the application on the ground the proposed use is incompatible with the adjacent existing use; and, WHEREAS, the Common Council held a public hearing on the restricted development preliminary plan request on February 23, 2011, and permitted all interested persons to be heard; and, WHEREAS, at the February 23`d public hearing, the Applicant's representative and the principal neighbor opposing the application appeared jointly and asked the application for renewal of this Restricted Development Conditional Use Permit be approved for one more year on the condition that it not be renewed or granted after the one year time period expires; and, WHEREAS, at the February 23rd public hearing, the Council amended condition #4 so as 410 read as follows: 4. This permit shall expire on February 28, 2012. The Applicant will not seek renewal of this Restricted Development Conditional Use Permit, or the initiation of a new Permit, for this location after February 28, 2012. WHEREAS, at the February 23rd public hearing, the Applicant agreed with all of the conditions including the revision to condition #4; and, WHEREAS, based upon a preponderance of the evidence submitted at the February 23`d public hearing, the Common Council adopts as its own the Planning Department's recommended findings of fact and conditions of approval, except as amended above; and, WHEREAS, based upon a preponderance and substantial weight of the evidence submitted at the February 23rd public hearing, the Common Council determines that the Applicant satisfied the criteria of sections 61.146 and 62.708 subject to the five conditions recommended by the Planning Department as amended above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that the amendment to Type III, Phase II, Restricted Development Conditional Use Permit #05-06, requested by Rochester Sand & Gravel Division of Mathy Construction is in all • 6 things approved subject to the above five conditions as amended above. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Common Council waives the final plan review for this project. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS 25XI- F 2011. PRESIDENT OF SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST C CLERK APPROVED THIS 2- 1 DAY OF FAeuc`y-, , 2011. A449 ead MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of iRochester, Minnesota) Zone!0NRestDevPermitAmd 11.0506 7