HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 287-09 •
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Cascade Meadow Wetlands, LLC, requested approval of land disturbing
activities associated with General Development Plan #292 that would allow the modification of
the grade on the property by more than ten feet. Section 62.1101(B)(1)(a) of the Rochester
Code of Ordinances defines such activity as a "Substantial Land Alteration". The property is
located along the south side of 19th Street N.W., north of the DM&E railroad tracks, and west
and north of Industrial Drive N.W.; and,
WHEREAS, R.C.O. § 62.1105 states that the City must approve a conditional use permit
authorizing an excavation activity if the applicant satisfies all of the requirements of Section
61.146 and, in addition, satisfies the following findings:
A. The activity will not result in a danger to life or property due to (1) steep or
unstable slopes, (2) unsafe access to the property, (3) excessive traffic, or (4)
proximity to existing or planned residential areas, parks and roadways;
B. Visual, noise, dust, and/or excessive on- or off-site environmental impacts on
public parks, roadways and residential areas can be adequately mitigated by the
• Applicant and a fully detailed plan is submitted by the Applicant to demonstrate
the mitigation methods to be ,used, the cost of such mitigation, the source of
funds for such mitigation, and adequate legal assurance that all of such
mitigation activities are carried out;
C. The use of trucks and heavy equipment will not adversely impact the safety and
maintenance of public roads providing access to the site, or such impacts will be
mitigated;
D. The proposed use will not adversely affect air quality or ground water or surface
water quality;
E. The proposed use will not adversely affect the scenic quality of Rochester or the
natural landscapes, environment, wildlife and wildlife habitat; or if such effects
are anticipated to occur, the reclamation plan provides for adequate restoration
of the site following completion of the excavation activity;
F. The activity will be compatible with existing development and development
anticipated in the future, including other uses as shown in the Comprehensive
Plan, including but not limited to: patterns of land use, recreational uses, existing
or planned development, public facilities, open space resources and other
natural resources;
•
1
•
G. The activity will not unduly affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties;
H. The site plan provides for adequate buffers and screening year-round from
unsightly features of the excavation operation;
I. The reclamation plan provides for adequate and appropriate restoration and
stabilization of cut and fill areas;
J. The excavation activity will not result in negative impacts on drainage patterns or
stormwater management facilities;
K. The proposed activity will minimize impacts on sinkholes, wetlands and other
natural features affecting ground water or surface water quality;
L. The intensity and the anticipated duration of the proposed excavation activity is
appropriate for the size and location of the activity;
M. Permanent and interim erosion and sediment control plans have been approved
by the City;
N. Surety has been provided that guarantees the site will be fully restored, after
completion of the excavation activity, to a safe condition, and one that permits
reuse of the site in a manner compatible with the Comprehensive Plan,
neighborhood plans, the Land Use Plan and applicable City policies.
O. The proposed activity complies with the requirements of the adopted building
code; and,
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2009, and July 6, 2009, the City of Rochester Common Council
held a public hearing on this Substantial Land Alteration application, reviewed the application
according to the requirements of R.C.O. § 61.146 and made the following findings:
1. Not applicable.
2. Not applicable.
3. Not applicable.
4. Not applicable.
5. The. Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve
the grading and drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate
permanent and interim erosion and sediment control.
2
6. Not applicable.
7. Not applicable.
8. Not applicable.
9. Not applicable; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Rochester Common Council also reviewed the application
according to the requirements of R.C.O. § 62.1105 and made the following findings:
1. The activity should not result in danger to life or property. The slopes on
the site will be a maximum of 3:1 and only a portion of the grading
involves cuts of fills in excess of 10 feet.
2. The grading plan for this project needs to be approved by the Rochester
Public Works Department and it will document the extent of the work.
Noise and dust control will need to comply with City standards.
3. The equipment conducting the grading work on the property will also be
the equipment utilized to move the earth. All materials will stay on-site, it
will not be necessary to truck in fill or haul fill from the site, which will
minimize the impact on the surroundings roads.
4. The proposed excavation work should not affect air quality or ground and
surface water quality.
5. The proposed grading work should not adversely affect the scenic quality
of Rochester. There will not be any steep slopes or exposed rock faces.
The natural topography of the area is being re-graded to provide adequate
slopes for development.
6. The result of the proposed activity will be compatible with existing
development and development anticipated in the future. The finished
result of the grading work will allow for development that is consistent with
the land use plan.
7. The grading will be confined to the property and should not affect the use
and enjoyment of adjacent properties. The duration of the excavation
activity is expected to be completed in eight phases taking approximately
one to four months for each phase.
8. ' ' The grading will only take place during eight phases taking approximately
•
3
• one to four months for each phase. Noise and dust control will need to
comply with City standards.
9. The grading and drainage plan will need to provide the proper restoration
and stabilization in. accordance with the adopted codes for the City of
Rochester.
10. The grading and drainage plans will need to be reviewed and approved by
the City. Stormwater management will be required for the development.
The grading plan will address existing drainage problems and correct on-
site erosion.
11. The areas of grading do not contain sinkholes or wetlands and should not
affect the ground water or surface quality once restoration and
stabilization is completed.
12. The grading work is expected to be completed in eight phases taking
approximately one to four weeks for each phase. The duration seems
appropriate for this type of activity and the size of the project.
13. The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve
the grading and drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate
permanent and interim erosion and sediment control.
14. Surety will need to be provided that guarantees the site will be fully
restored after the completion of the excavation activity. This surety can
be provided through the owner-contract process for this development. If
grading is to occur prior to an owner-contract, a separate surety will need
to be provided.
15. The grading and drainage plan will need to be approved by the Rochester
Public Works Department prior to any grading on the property.
16. The property is not located within the Decorah Edge or the Cummingsville
Formation that are within 1,000 feet of Edge Support Areas.
17. Provisions will be made to direct groundwater flow into managed
wetlands; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the
substantial land alteration activity based upon the above findings of fact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of
Rochester that, based upon the above-stated findings of fact, the Applicant has shown by a
•
4
aubstantial weight of the evidence submitted at the public hearing that it has satisfied the criteria
found at sections 61.146 and 62.1105 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances if the following
condition of approval is satisfied:
1. The applicant shall provide surety that guarantees the site will be fully
restored after the completion of the excavation activity. Said surety must
be provided prior to commencement of grading activities on the property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Common Council that the City does approve the
proposed conditional use permit authorizing the Substantial Land Alteration activity as proposed
by Cascade Meadow Wetlands LLC, associated with General Development Plan #292 that
would allow the modification of the grade by greater than ten feet subject to the one condition.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS C07H DAY OF ��C���( _, 2009.
PRESIDENT OF SAID COMMON COUNCIL
ATTEST:
• CITY CLERK
APPROVED THIS -7771 DAY OF CJ�Jy , 2009.
MAYOR OF SAID CITY
(Seal of the City of
Rochester, Minnesota)
Zone 05\SubLandAlt\42
•
5