The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution No. 472-05 T • :saoanosaa leinjeu aagjo pue saoanosaa coeds uado 'sa!l!l!oel ollgnd '}uawdolanap pauueld ao 6uils!xa 'sasn leuo!leaaoaa 'asn puel jo suia}}ed :ol pa}!w!l IOU Inq 6ulpnlou! `veld anisuagaadwo:D aqj ui umogs se sasn jaq}o bulpnlou! `ajnln} aqj u! paled!o!}ue }uawdolanap pue juawdolanap 6u!}slxe q}!m algpledwoo aq ll!M ApIjoe aql 'Aj!n!}oe uo!}eneoxa aqJ 10 uoljaldwoo 6upollol a}!s aqj jo uoilejo}sai a}enbape jol sap!noid ueld uoljewelow aqj 'in000 o} pa}edlo!lue aae sloa}}a gons j! ao 'je}!geq 91!lpl!M pue 91!lpl!M 'Juawuoa!nua 'sadeospuel leinjeu aqj jo aalsagoo�l jo Al!lenb olueos aqj Joa}}e AlasJanpe IOU il!M asn pasodoid aql EI 'AI!lenb aalem eoe}jns ao jalem punoa6 ao Al!lenb i!e joa}je A!asJanpe IOU ll!M asn pasodoid aql •Q pale6ilp aq ll!M s}oedwi gons ao '@I!s aqj 01 ssaooe 6uip!noid speoi ollgnd jo eoueualulew pue Alejes aqj joedw! Alasaanpe }ou ll!M juawdlnbe AAeaq pue gong} jo asn aql •:D 'Ino pa!aaeo aae s911!n110e u011e611!w gons jo Ile legl aoueinsse lebal alenbape pue 'uolle6!l!w gons col spun] jo aoinos eqj `uolle6!l!w gons jo }soo eqj 'pasn aq of spoglaw uo!Ie611!w aqj • aIejlsuou.wep 01 lueo!lddy eqj Aq pa}}!wgns si ueld pal!elap Ailnj a pue lueo!lddy eqj Aq pa}ebilp Alalenbape aq ueo seaie le!}uap!sai pue sAennpeoi 'shied ollgnd uo sloedwi le}uawualnua aI!s-}Jo ao -uo anissaoxa Jo/pue 'Isnp 'as!ou 'lensln •8 :sAempeoi pue sued 'seaje le!luap!sai pauueld jo 6u!ls!xa o}Al!wlxoad (17) Jo `01}4eJl anlssaoxa (E) 'Alaadoid eqj o} ssaooe ajesun (Z) 'sadols alge}sun ao deals (() of anp A:pedoid ao aj!l of ja6uep a u! }lnsaj IOU ll!M AI!n!;oe aql V :s6uipu!J 6u1nnolloj aq} sa!Ssljes `uo!}!ppe w 'pue 917L•1,9 uo!loaS jo sluawailnbai eqj jo Ile sags!les }ueogdde eqj j! Aj!n!}oe uoljeneoxa ue 6u!zuoglne I!waad asn leuo!}!puoo e anoidde }snw Al!o aq} Jegl salels 901,VZ9 § 'O'�'2� 'SdEI2iEIHM `pue :•M•S peo�J auo}spla!d pue '•M•S aoeld uolsaM jo uollenulluoo eqj jol smolle pue }uawdolanap wUeJ }aeH aqJ 10 you `'M'S anuany u;g 1, ;o Isam paleool s! A:padoid aqj_ •„uoljeaajly pue j le!luelsgns„ a se sapea6 aq} jo uo!}eog pow a gons saullap seoueu!pio ;o apoO Ja}sagoo�j aqj ;o LOl-l.•Z9 uoljaas aaow ao jaej ual Aq sapej6 eqj jo uo!}eoq!pow eqj molle pinom }eqj 17Z-t70# leld leul j q}!m p91eloosse sa!j!nljoe 6ulganlslp puel jo leriojdde palsenlow }uawdolanaa dJ 'SVMJ3HM NOiimoS=i2j 77 -' • G. The activity will not unduly affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties; H. The site plan provides for adequate buffers and screening year-round from unsightly features of the excavation operation; I. The reclamation plan provides for adequate and appropriate restoration and stabilization of cut and fill areas; J. The excavation activity will not result in negative impacts on drainage patterns or stormwater management facilities; K. The proposed activity will minimize impacts on sinkholes, wetlands and other natural features affecting ground water or surface water quality; L. The intensity and the anticipated duration of the proposed excavation activity is appropriate for the size and location of the activity; M. Permanent and interim erosion and sediment control plans have been approved by the City; N. Surety has been provided .that guarantees the site will be fully restored, after • completion of the excavation activity, to a safe condition, and one that permits reuse of the site in a manner compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood plans, the Land Use Plan and applicable City policies. O. The proposed activity complies with the requirements of the adopted building code; and, WHEREAS, on September 19, 2005, the City of Rochester Common Council held a public hearing on this Substantial Land Alteration application, reviewed the application according to the requirements of R.C.O. § 61.146 and made the following findings: 1. Not applicable. 2. Not applicable. 3. Not applicable. 4. The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve the grading and drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate permanent and interim erosion and sediment control. 5. Not applicable. 6. Not applicable. 7. Not applicable. 8. Not applicable. • 2 • WHEREAS, the City of Rochester Common Council also reviewed the application according to the requirements of R.C.O. § 62.1105 and made the following findings: 1. The activity should not result in danger to life or property. The slopes on the site will be a maximum of 3:1. The grading and drainage plans will need to comply with City standards and be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department. 2. The grading plan for this project needs to be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department and it will document the extent of the work. All cut material will be used on site. Therefore, it will not be necessary to haul fill from the site. Noise and dust control will need to comply with City standards. 3. The equipment conducting the grading work on the property will also be the equipment utilized to move the earth. All excess material will be used on the site. It will not be necessary to haul fill from the site, which will minimize the impact on the surroundings roads. 4. The proposed excavation work should not affect air quality, the ground water or surface water quality. • 5. The proposed grading work should not adversely affect the scenic quality of Rochester. There will not be any steep slopes or exposed rock faces. The natural topography of the area is being re-graded to provide adequate slopes for single family dwellings. 6. The result of the-- proposed activity will be compatible with existing development and development anticipated in the future. The finished result of the grading work will allow for development that is consistent with the land use plan. 7. The grading will be confined to the property and should not affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. The duration of the excavation activity is expected to be completed in approximately 12 weeks. 8. The grading will be completed within one phase taking approximately 12 weeks. There are homes in the immediate area that will be visually affected by the grading activity but it will be for only a short period of time during the grading process. Noise and dust control will need to comply with City standards. 3 . 9. The grading and drainage plan will need to provide the proper restoration and stabilization in accordance with the adopted codes for the City of Rochester. 10. The grading and drainage plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the City. Stormwater management will be required for the development. 11. The areas of grading do not contain sinkholes or wetlands and should not affect the ground water or surface quality once restoration and stabilization is completed. 12. The grading work is expected to be completed in one phase taking approximately 12 weeks to complete. The duration seems appropriate for this type of activity and the size of the project. 13. The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve the grading and drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate permanent and interim erosion and sediment control. 14. Surety will need to be provided that guarantees the site will be fully restored after the completion of the excavation activity. This surety can • be provided through the owner-contract process for this development. If grading is to occur prior to an owner-contract, a separate surety will need to be provided. 15. The grading and drainage plan will need to be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department prior to any grading on the property; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the substantial land alteration activity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that, based upon the above-stated findings of fact, the Applicant has shown by a substantial weight of the evidence submitted at the public hearing that it has satisfied the criteria found at Sections 61.146 and 62.1105 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Common Council that the City does approve the proposed conditional use permit authorizing the Substantial Land Alteration activity as proposed by GP Development associated with Final Plat#04-24. 4 • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS I q 4-h DAY OF-,S-Lpt-m�- , 2005. RESIDENT OF SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST: Dtput, CIGLE�y APPROVED THIS c. DAY OF 5) D ptLYYLL,L , 2005. MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester,.Minnesota) ZoneMSubLandAM18 i 5