Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 074-06 w x w rM ti a i sx a RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on August 9, 2005, The Gardens Manufactured Home Community LLC, submitted a Closure/Conversion Statement to the Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department; and, WHEREAS, the closure or conversion of a manufactured home park is regulated by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 327C and Rochester Code of Ordinances Chapter 120; and, WHEREAS, on September 23, 2005, the Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department sent notice to the owner of each manufactured home located in The Gardens Manufactured Home Community stating the hearing date, time, place and purpose. A public hearing was scheduled for October 3, 2005, but, as requested by the applicant, was continued to October 17; 2005, and then, as requested by the applicant, was continued to February 6, 2006. On January 27, 2006, a new notice of the February 6, 2006, public hearing was sent to the owners of each manufactured home in The Gardens; and, WHEREAS, R.C.O. §120.05 states that a public hearing must be held before the City Council for the purpose of reviewing the closure statement and evaluating the impact, if any, the park closing may have on displaced residents and the park owner. The ordinance indicates that, before any change in use or cessation of operation and as a condition of such change in use or cessation of operation, the City Council may require the park owner to compensate the displaced residents for their reasonable relocation costs; and, WHEREAS, the "Closure/Conversion Statement" provided by the park owners included a statement that it is anticipated that there will be no relocation costs payable to any Home Owner since no home owner will be required to vacate his/her lot due to the conversion." The park owners propose to offer lots for sale, but will continue to rent lots to the existing residents who do not purchase their lot. The park owners recently provided a comparison of rent versus ownership for the lots in The Gardens and associated costs to residents. The finance summary suggested that there would be no cost increase to existing residents with the conversion of the park to those who continue to rent lots, outside of lot rents increased annually by the Consumer Price Index; and, WHEREAS, the park owners have made a commitment that they will not rent any of the vacant lots for the purpose of placement of a manufactured home. The vacant lots will only be available for sale. Furthermore, the park owners have said that they will continue to rent lots to existing residents only. Through attrition, the park would transition to a single family subdivision; and, WHEREAS, according to the Planning Department staff report, the issues before the • Council are whether the information submitted by the park owners is sufficient to make a decision on the potential financial impacts related to the park closure/conversion, whether the OCouncil approves the proposed change in use of this property, whether there are potential financial impacts to "displaced residents" and whether compensation will be required from the park owners to the "displaced residents;" and, WHEREAS, the Planning Department staff report recommended the finding that the existing residents will not be forced to leave The Gardens as a result of this park closure/conversion. The park owners have stated that they will continue to lease lots to residents who wish to continue to lease and will offer lots for sale to those who wish to purchase their lots. As such, the staff recommended the Council not require compensation to "displaced residents;" and, WHEREAS, the Council considered this matter at its February 6, 2006, meeting and, using a public hearing process, allowed all interested parties to present information to the Council for its consideration; and, WHEREAS, at the February 6th public hearing, a representative of the park owners testified that, since none of the existing park residents were required to move out of the park, no relocation benefits should be required. The representative stated that the park owners were agreeable to a condition of approval that indicated any change in that policy would require the filing of a new park closure/conversion statement and a public hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. ch. 327C and R.C.O. ch. 120, and the possibility that the Council would then require the payment of relocation benefits; and, . WHEREAS, at the February 6th public hearing, a legal representative of several residents of The Gardens appeared and gave testimony on the matter. The legal representative stated that the Council should order relocation benefits to any resident who chooses to leave as a result of the closure/conversion without regard to the policy that none of the current residents are being required to leave the park; and, WHEREAS, the Council considered all of the testimony provided at the hearing including the written documentation that is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, Minnesota, that it makes the following determinations: 1. The information submitted by owners of The Gardens is sufficient to make a decision on potential financial impacts related to the closure/conversion of The Gardens; 2. The Council does approve the change in use for the park subject to the conditions noted herein; and, 3. In light of the policy of the owners of The Gardens providing the current residents of The Gardens the ability to continue leasing their lots despite the • closure/conversion of this park, any financial impact upon the displaced residents is not sufficient to warrant the required payment of financial compensation; 4. The representative of The Gardens indicated to the Council that the current residents of The Gardens will be allowed to continue leasing their lots rather than purchasing their lots. The City's approval of the closure/conversion statement and the change in use without any requirement of relocation benefits is made, in part, in reliance upon this representation. If the park owners wish to amend this policy so that any of the current residents of The Gardens will not be allowed to lease their lots, the park owners must submit its policy change to the Common Council for approval, and the possible requirement of relocation benefits as part of that approval, pursuant to the process provided by R.C.O. ch. 120, Minn. Stat. ch. 327C, or their successor provisions; and 5. The Gardens may not be closed or converted prior to May 9, 2006. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS OF 2006. PRESIDENT OF SAID COMMON COUNCIL •ATTEST: CLERK APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2006. ' MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) Zone05W1 HPOose.Gardens • FE 06/2006i140N 07:22 P1:4 BIPBi LAV-1 Fr.a No. 507 282 7736 P. 002 • BIRD ACOBSEN & STEVENS ' � � 305.JRONv✓OOD SQUARE•300'ftiIRD A'VEI�'UE S.E. Attorneys at Law RocxEsrr_R,M.UINESOTn 5590 (507)282-1503 FAX(507)282-7756 CHARLES A.BIRD"f www.birdjacobseo.com VAN P.JACOBSEN JERYTAY R.STEVENS ANDREA B:NMSF'v" February 6, 2006 via facsimile only: 285-8256 Rochester City Council c/o Judy Scherr, City Clerk Rochester City Clerk's Office ' 2010 Street SE, Room 135 Rochester, MN 55904 RE: The Gardens'Manufactured Home Community Dear City Council: Our office represents numerous residents who will undoubtedly be displaced as a result of the proposed closing/conversion of The Gardens Manufactured Home • Community. These individuals include: Muriel A. Grant, Jane C. Rabine, Debra J. McKnight, Curtis Ruhland, Julie Schultz, .Shawn M. Stewart, Bernard E. Williams, Shirley Tikhomiroff,.Christopher M. Vail, Angi M. Vail, Gabriel J..Finseth, and Crystal M. Finseth.' The Rochester City Ordinance section 120.02, subd. 3, defines "displaced resident" as follows: A resident of an owner-occupied manufactured home who rents a lot in a manufactured home park, including the 'members of the resident's household, as of the date the park owner submits a closure statement to the City's Planning Commission. It cannot be disputed that each of these individuals is therefore a displaced resident, and-entitled-to protections of the ordinance. There is no requirement in the ordinance that the displaced resident prove he/she is being forced to move. The displaced resident can simply choose to move and be compensated. The Planning Department staff indicates that the finance summary submitted with the application for the closure suggests that there would be no increased cost to existing residents with the conversion. The staff analysis is simplistic and not accurate. First, owners of a manufactured home have legitimate reasons not to want to live in a ' Attached are letters of objection from the following individuals: Muriel A. Grant, Julie Schultz, and • Shirley Tikhomiroff. These letters should be considered In conjunction with this letter on behaff of our clients. 'ALSO ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN WISCONSIN 10ERTIFIED TRIAL SPECIALIST BY M114NESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIOI'VCERTIFIED BY NA BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCACY FEB/061200'6AIION 07:?? PM BIRD LAII,l FAX No. 507 ?$? 7736 F. 1103 • Page 2 February 6,2006 • common interest community. Second, the promises of the owners that they will continue to lease is vague, indefinite and, frankly, legally unenforceable. The staff analysis is based entirely upon the park owners' assertion that they will continue to lease lots to residents for a period of time that is "unknown." There are several problems with this. The following are the most obvious reasons why our clients do, and others may, chose not to live in a common interest community: With the closing/conversion of The Gardens Manufactured Home Community, the current residents will lose protections and benefits they have under state and local laws and regulations pertaining to manufactured home communities. They will also lose the protections and benefits of the rules and regulations of The Gardens which were in effect when the residents moved in, as well as those protections as contained in the lease agreements. Residents of the common interest community will have no obligation to continue the current rules and regulations. Nothing in the scheme of The Gardens Manufactured. Home Community will guarantee the residents each previously promised amenity. A common interest community association may vote to discontinue an amenity at any time. The scheme of The Gardens Manufactured Home Community will not prevent subleases and absent owners. The current residents that do not purchase their lots are guaranteed not to have a voice in any association decisions as they will be at the merdy of their landlords to vote on issues that may have direct harmful effects on —.-------__---- the residents. • The Gardens Manufactured Home Community has indicated that offering property for ownership rather than renting will permit residents to obtain financing for their homes. This,. too, is a simplistic view. The financing option submitted to the residents with a lot purchase agreement requires the owner to pay a three percent down-payment of both the home and the lot. Many of the current homeowners in The Gardens are of limited means, some even with poor credit scores, are unable to produce such a down- payment, simply precluding them from purchasing the land. There is much concern regarding an increase in lot rent or an unreasonable association fee. The Gardens Manufactured Home Community has made no guarantees that lot rent will not increase or that unreasonable association-fees will not be assessed at the whim of the ownership majority. FEB 0V2/00'6iM0N 07:22 PM BIPD LAIN FAX No, 507 282 7736 F. 004 • Page 3 February 6, 2006 • Questions remain with regard to maintenance and ownership of such systems such as roadways and sewer lines. With the current lack of upkeep of common areas in The Gardens, the .residents remain skeptical about whether such systems will in fact be maintained. As such, in accordance with the Rochester City Ordinance, section 120.06, the City should allocate relocation costs to each resident of The Gardens Manufactured Home Community who chooses to leave as a result of the closure/conversion. By requiring compensation in the fomn of reasonable relocation fees, the City will permit each displaced resident to relocate to a new community and leave behind this scheme which was never contemplated with the purchase of the home and the signing of the lease. Further, the City should guarantee that each displaced resident is provided adequate compensation, as this closure/conversion eliminates the very reason each of these resident chose to reside at The Gardens. If the homes cannot be moved due to poor structural condition, the City should require a payment in lieu of the relocation costs or the amount equal to the estimated market value of the home,whichever is greater. On behalf of the above-named individuals, I thank you for your assistance and understanding with in this matter. Very truly yours, Andrea B. Niesen and rea@birdjacobsen.com ABN/ • FED/'06/20H A ON 07:22 PI4 BIPD LAW FAX No, 507 202 '1736 F, 005 This is to address the proposal that"The Gardens"be allowed to convert to owned lots. I have been a resident of"The Gardens" since February of 2001. It has been a complete disappointment. I was convinced that safety and quality of life in the community would of utmost importance to the owners, however,this has proved to be entirely false. The safety features have been completely abandoned and the living conditions have been intolerable. I am convinced that it is a ploy oni the part of.the owners of"The Gardens" and "Windmill Homes"to offer the lots for sale and thus convert the park. There are a number of homeowners who have a pending arbitration and class action suit, and I am in that group. By converting the property, the owners will manage to avoid their responsibility to satisfy these actions,thereby leaving a number of homeowners with considerable financial burden. I implore this board to suspend any judgment on the property conversion until sucb. time that the homewxmers who would be so financially damaged have the necessary time to settle the pending legal actions. Thank you. Sincerely, . Muriel A Grant FEBi O612O06iMON 07:22 P14 BIPD LAW FAX No. 507 282 7736 F. 006 I am not sure whether or not I will be able to make it to the meeting tonight, so please accept this letter as my formal objection to the conversion of The Gardens Manufactured Horne Community from a manufactured home park to a common interest community. I own the home located at 4216 Daffodil Avenue S.E,Rochester,MN 55904. I do not have the means to purchase the lot where my home is located. I•cwould not have the desire to purchase the lot evea if I had the means to do so. I have n'amerous concerns regarding the conversion which have not yet been addressed, including: lack of maintenance of common areas,inability to sell my home,possibility that my home could be next to more commercial development, etc. Please accept this document as my formal objection to the conversion proposed by The Gardens Manufactured Home Community. Mot chultz 4216 Daffodil Avenue S.E. Rochester,MN 55901 FEBi 06/2015VY10N 07:22 PIA BIPD LAW FA.X No, 507 282 7736 F, 007. OCT 03,2005 12:06 S. Ti.khomi.roff 5075360991 Page 2 • Shirley Lou Tikhomiroff 4228 baffodil Avenue, S.E. Rochester, MN 55904 October 3, 2005 Common Council of the City of Rochester Council/Board Chambers Government Center 151 Fourth Street S.E. Rochester, MN 55904 Re: Common Council Meeting Monday, October 03, 2005 Ladies and Gentlemen: If The Gardens plan to cease operation of this park is granted through the re-zoning of the park to allow(or force)current resident home owners to become owners of the lots on which their homes are located it will be a disastrous outcome for me and for the two disabled persons who live with me. An alternative of negotiating a new lease with a Community Managerwill be equally disastrous. This person also makes promises he has no intention of keeping and I have been seriously inconvenienced in believing his statements in the past. I do not have the money to buy this lot and, as I live on Social Security alone, do not expect to have more money in the future. The home is not re-sellable, as its construction Is faulty. The lot's utility installations, waterlines, etc,are not what they _..... . .. . . ..:should be.in this:climate...I.also do not.have funds to.move this home to another location, nor do.1 - -•-have another location where I could move it if it would survive the move. In short, I do not want to live here but I have no other alternatives because I have lived here for more than two years. As a senior citizen, I respectfully beg the City Council to deny the re-zoning requests, especially for the occupied area of The Gardens and to help keep some.of us from being homeless. Thank you, S.Tikhomiroff ' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2-6-06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING ITEM DESCRIPTION: The Gardens Manufactured Home Park—Notice of Closing PREPARED BY: Mitzi A.Baker, Senior Planner February 2, 2006 Planning Staff Review See attached planning staff report. Staff recommends accepting the"Notice of Closure/Conversion"for The Gardens Manufactured Home Park subject to the following requirements: 1. The Park shall not be closed or converted prior to May 9, 2006 Council Action Requested: The Council shall hold a public hearing. Following the hearing, the Council should direct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution supporting the Councils decision. Attachments 1. Copy of staff report. Distribution: 1. City Administrator 2. City Attorney 3. Planning Department File COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT )10LOCHESTE$.�yrNY�� 2122 Campus Drive SE,Suite 100•Rochester,MN 55904-4744 ;•' o x COUNTY OF www.olmstedcounty.com/planning moo• 02 �AORA TEI):Al1Gl)ST.S•P9• DATE: February 2, 2006 TO: Rochester Common Council FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner RE: The Gardens Manufactured Home Community Park Closure/Conversion Statement Notice of Closing: The Gardens Manufactured Home Community LLC, submitted a complete"Closure/Conversion Statement'to the Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department on August 9, 2005. As stated in Chapter 120, Section 120.03 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances, the"Closure Statement'shall • be submitted nine (9) months prior to the closure of a Manufactured Home Park. Therefore, the park owners will not be allowed to close or convert the park any earlier than May 9, 2006. The closure or conversion of a manufactured home park is regulated by Chapter 327 Minnesota Statues and Chapter 120 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances. Notice of Public Hearing and Public Neighborhood Meeting: The Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department sent notice to the owner of each manufactured home located in The Gardens Manufactured Home Community on September 23, 2005 stating the hearing date, time, place and purpose. A public hearing was scheduled for October 3, 2005, but at the request of the applicant, was continued to October 17,2005 and later tabled to February 6, 2006. A new notice of public hearing was sent to the owners of each manufactured home in The Gardens on January 27, 2006. Purpose of Public Hearing: RCO 120.05. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held before the City Council for the purpose of reviewing the closure statement and evaluating the impact, if any, the park closing may have on the displaced residents and the park owner. Before any change of use or cessation of operation, and as a condition of such change in use or cessation of operation, the City Council may require the park owner to compensate the displaced residents for their reasonable relocation costs or, if a manufactured home cannot be relocated, make a payment in lieu thereof. BUILDING CODE 507/285-8345 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 w.awc. PLANNING/ZONING 507/285-8232 - WELL/SEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/287-2275 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • Subd.3. "Displaced Resident" means a resident of an owner-occupied manufactured home who rents a lot in a manufactured home park, including the members of the resident's household, as of the date the park owner submits a closure statement to the City's Planning Commission. Following the hearing the Council shall determine the amount of compensation to be paid, if any, to the displaced residents. According to Chapter 120, Section 120.06, Subd. 2, of the Rochester Code of Ordinances, payment of relocation costs are as follows: A. The actual expenses incurred in moving the displaced resident's manufactured home and personal property, including the reasonable cost of disassembling, moving and reassembling any attached appurtenances, such as porches, decks, skirting and awning which were not acquired after notice of closure or conversion of the park, and utility"hook-up"charges. B. The cost of insurance for replacement value of the property being moved. C. The total cost, not to exceed 15% of the County Assessor's estimated market value of the structure, of minor repairs or modifications that are required in order to move the manufactured home. D. Required deposits at the relocation site in excess of any amount returned to the manufactured home owner, up to a maximum of$250.00. • Background Information: The"Closure/Conversion Statement", provided by the Park owners, included a statement that"It is anticipated that there will be no relocation costs payable to any Home Owner since no Home Owner will be required to vacate his/her lot due to the conversion". The Park owners propose to offer lots for sale, but will continue to rent lots to the existing residents who do not purchase their lot. The Park owners recently provided a comparison of rent versus ownership for the lots in The Gardens, and associated costs to residents. The finance summary suggests there would be no cost increase to existing residents with the conversion of the park to those who continue to rent lots, outside of lot rents increased annually by the Consumer Price Index. Planning Staff met with the Park owners and their representatives along with representatives from the Olmsted County Health Department, City Administration and City Attorney's office in October 2005 to discuss some of the anticipated outcomes of this closure/conversion as they relate to the transition and application of regulations. The Park owners have made a commitment that they will not rent any of the vacant lots for the purpose of placement of a manufactured home. The vacant lots will only be available for sale. Furthermore, the Park owners have said that they will continue to rent lots to existing residents only. Through attrition, the Park would transition to a single family subdivision. The time over which this transition would occur is unknown. The State Health Department regulates Manufactured Home Parks, and locally this is administered through the Olmsted County Public Health. The County Public Health Department will continue to license those parts of The Gardens that will be operated as a Manufactured home • Park, as addressed by Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota Rules. The City Council will also need to determine whether the information submitted by the Park • owners is sufficient to make a decision on potential financial impacts related to the Park closure/conversion. The Council will need to determine whether there are potential financial impacts to"displaced residents", and whether compensation will be required from the Park owners to the"displaced residents". Planning Staff Recommendation: It appears that existing residents will not be forced to leave with this Park Closure/Conversion. The Park owners have stated that they will continue to lease lots to residents who wish to continue to lease, and will offer lots for sale to those who wish to purchase their lot. Considering these unique circumstances, it does not appear that the City should require compensation to "displaced residents", in this case. Staff recommends accepting the "Notice of Closure/Conversion"for The Gardens Manufactured Home Park subject to the following requirements: I 1. The Park shall not be closed or converted prior to May 9,2006. Attachments: 1) Closure Statement submitted by The Gardens Manufactured Home Community. 2) Copy of Chapter 120 Rochester Code of Ordinances. • 3) Financial information provided by The Gardens 4) Letter from Olmsted County Public Health _I 'II • MANUFACTURED HOME PARK CLOSINGS 120.01. Purpose. In view of the unique nature and problems presented by the closure or conversion of manufactured home parks, the City Council finds that the public health, safety and general welfare will be promoted by: 1. requiring compensation to displaced residents of such parks; 2. providing for proper disposal of potentially obsolete and dilapidated manufactured homes; and 3. establishing the requirements for the closure of manufactured home parks in the City of Rochester pursuant to Section 327C.095 of the Minnesota Statutes. 120.02. Definitions. The following words and terms used in this chapter shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Subdivision 1. "Closure Statement" means a statement prepared by the park owner clearly stating that the park is closing, addressing the availability, location and potential cost of adequate replacement housing within a 25-mile radius of the park that is closing, and the probable relocation costs of the manufactured homes located in the park. Subd. 2. "Department" means the Rochester Olmsted Planning Department. • Subd. 3. "Displaced Resident" means a resident of an owner- occupied manufactured home who rents a lot in a manufactured home park, including the members of the resident's household, as of the date the park owner submits a closure statement to the City's Planning Commission. Subd.4. "Lot" means an area within a manufactured home park designed or used for the accommodation of a manufactured home. Subd. 5. "Manufactured Home" means a structure, not fixed to or part of real estate, transportable in one or more sections,which in the traveling mode, is eight body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities, and includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning and electrical system contained in it. Subd. 6. "Manufactured Home Park" means any site, lot,field or tract of land upon which two or more occupied manufactured homes are located, either free of charge or for compensation, and includes any building, structure, tent, vehicle or enclosure used or intended for use as part of the equipment of the manufactured home park. This definition does not include facilities which are open only during three or fewer seasons of the year. Subd. 7. "Park Owner" means the owner of a manufactured home park and any person acting on behalf of the owner in the operation or management of a park. • Subd. 8. "Person" means any individual, corporation, firm, partnership, incorporated and unincorporated association, or any other legal or commercial entity. i i 120.03. Notice of Closing. If a manufactured home park is to be closed or • converted in whole or in part to another use, or terminated as a use of the property,the park owner shall, at least nine months prior to the closure or conversion to another use or termination of use, provide a copy of a closure statement to a resident of each manufactured home located in the manufactured home park and to the Department. The Department shall charge a fee, in an amount determined by Council resolution, for the cost incurred in processing the closure statements. 120.04. Notice of Public Hearing. The Department shall submit the closure statement to the City Council at a public hearing. At least ten days prior to the public hearing, the Department shall mail a notice to the owner of each manufactured home in the park and to any resident paying rent to the park owner. The notice shall state the hearing's time, place and purpose. The park owner shall provide the Department with a list of the names and addresses of at least one resident of each manufactured home in the park at the time the closure statement is submitted to the Department. 120.05. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held before the City Council for the purpose of reviewing the closure statement and evaluating the impact, if any, the park closing may have on the displaced residents and the park owner. Before any change of use or cessation of operation, and as a condition of such change in use or cessation of operation,the City Council may require the park owner to compensate the displaced residents for their reasonable relocation costs or, if a manufactured home cannot be relocated, make a payment in lieu thereof. 120.06. Payment of Relocation Costs. Subdivision 1. Following the submission of the closure statement and the public hearing, the park owner shall pay to • each displaced resident the amount determined by the Council pursuant to Section 120.05 to be reasonable relocation costs. Subd.2. Reasonable relocation costs may include: A. The actual expense incurred in moving the displaced resident's manufactured home and personal property, including the reasonable cost of disassembling, moving and reassembling any attached appurtenances, such as porches, decks, skirting and awnings which were not acquired after notice of closure or conversion of the park, and utility"hook-up" charges. B. The cost of insurance for the replacement value of the property being moved. C. The total cost, not to exceed 15% of the County Assessor's estimated market value of the structure, of minor repairs or modifications that are required in order to move the manufactured home. D. Required deposits at the relocation site in excess of any amount returned to the manufactured home owner, up to a maximum of$250.00. 120.07. Payment In Lieu Of Relocation Cost. Subdivision 1. If a resident cannot relocate the manufactured home with a 25-mile radius of the park that is being closed, the Council may require the owner to make a payment to the resident in lieu of • relocation costs in order to mitigate the adverse financial impact of the park closing. The payment in lieu shall be an amount equal to the estimated market value of the • I am not sure whether or not I will be able to make it to the meeting tonight, so please accept this letter as my formal objection to the conversion of The Gardens Manufactured Home Community from a manufactured home park to a common interest community. I own the home located at 4216 Daffodil Avenue S.E, Rochester, MN 55904. I do not have the means to purchase the lot where my home is located. I would not have the desire to purchase the lot even if I had the means to do so. I have numerous concerns regarding the conversion which have not yet been addressed, including: lack of maintenance of common areas, inability to sell my home,possibility that my home could be next to more commercial development, etc. Please accept this document as my formal objection to the conversion proposed by The Gardens Manufactured Home Community. . eLa i JuHTSchultz 4216 Daffodil Avenue S.E. Rochester, MN 55901 • i manufactured home as determined by the County Assessor or the average relocation • cost awarded to other park residents, whichever is greater. Subd. 2. If it is not possible to fairly compute an average relocation cost, the payment shall be based upon an estimate prepared by a qualified manufactured home mover. 120.08. Verification of Cost and Distribution of Payments. The displaced resident must submit a contract or other verified cost estimate for relocating the manufactured home to the park owner for approval as a condition to the park owner's liability to pay relocation expenses. If the park owner refuses to pay the contract or other verified cost estimate, the park owner shall arrange for relocating the manufactured home and pay the relocation costs identified in Section 120.06. Relocation payments must be made no later than the date upon which the manufactured home is removed from the park. In the case of manufactured homes that cannot be removed, the in lieu payment shall be made at the time of, and shall be contingent upon, the tendering of the manufactured home's title to the park owner. In the event that the owner is unable to locate the title to the manufactured home, the owner shall sign an affidavit setting forth: (1) the inability to locate the title; (2) the home owner's desire to transfer ownership of the home to the park owner for disposal purposes; and (3) the home owner's agreement to transfer ownership and releasing the park owner from any liability for the home's eventual disposal. 120.09. Disposition of Manufactured Homes Not Capable of Being Relocated. As a condition of the change in use or cessation of operation of the manufactured home park, the City Council may require that any manufactured home not capable of being relocated due to non-compliance with Rochester's Building Code shall • be demolished and disposed in accordance with any and all applicable laws and regulations. The park owner is responsible for the costs of demolition and disposal 120.10. Penalty. Subdivision 1. A violation of any provision of this chapter shall be a misdemeanor. In addition,the City Attorney may enforce any provision of this chapter by injunction or other appropriate civil remedy. Subd.2. The City shall not issue a building permit or zoning certificate in conjunction with reuse of manufactured home park property unless the park owner has paid reasonable relocation costs or the in lieu payment as required by this chapter. (3493, 6/17/02; 3496, 7/1/02) CHAPTER 125 (Repealed by Ordinance No. 2546, 5/4/87; See Chapter 125A] • . THE GARDENS MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY PARK CLOSURE/CONVERSION STATEMENT TO: The City of Rochester and the Residents of The Gardens Manufactured Home Community YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that The Gardens Manufactured Home Community LLC, (the "Park Owner"),which owns and operates The Gardens Manufactured Home Community, ("The Gardens"), plans to cease operation of The Gardens as a manufactured home park effective no sooner than 9 months from the date you receive this notice. The purpose of the cessation of The Gardens as a manufactured home park is to convert The Gardens from a manufactured home park (in which all of the lots are under common ownership and each lot is leased to the owner(s) of the home located on that lot) to a common interest community(in • which a lot may be owned by the owner(s) of the home located on that lot). The conversion is being done at the urging of residents of The Gardens. Presently, the Park Owner owns all of the lots on which the homes in The Gardens are located and the owners of the homes ("Home Owners")pay monthly lot rent to the Park Owner. The conversion will create a "common interest community" in which each of the lots will be platted as a separate lot that can be sold by the Park Owner to the Home Owner. The common areas of The Gardens (such as the streets (if they remain private streets),the club house and the other non-public amenities) will be owned and operated by a homeowners' association consisting of the owners of all lots in The Gardens. Home Owners who purchase their lots will no longer have to pay lot rent. It is felt that this will make it easier to obtain financing for homes located in The Gardens. Home Owners who choose not to purchase their lots may continue to rent that lot on terms that are mutually agreeable to the Park Owner and the Home Owner. All existing lot leases with Home Owners will be honored. Under Minnesota law, the Home Owners have the following rights: 1. A Home Owner may not be required to vacate the lot that he/she presently occupies • P Y until 60 days after the City holds a public hearing to determine what relocation costs, if any,may be payable by the Park Owner to the Home Owner. [It is anticipated that there will be no relocation costs payable to any Home Owner since no Home Owner will be required to vacate his/her lot due to the conversion.] 2. If a lot is available in another section of The Gardens that will continue to be operated as a manufactured home park, the Home Owner shall be allowed to relocate the home to that lot. [It is anticipated that all of The Gardens will be converted to the common interest community.] 3. The terms of your present tenancy may not be altered during the notice period, except that you may vacate and terminate your present occupancy upon one month's written notice to the Park Owner. • 4. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, you maybe required to vacate your lot prior to the end of the notice period by reason of non-payment of rent, utilities or other monetary obligations, violations of law, waste, or conduct that disturbs other occupants'peaceful enjoyment of The Gardens. 5. Nothing shall prevent the Park Owner and any Home Owner from agreeing to a right of occupancy on a month-to-month basis beyond the notice period, or to an earlier termination of the right of occupancy. 6. Not less than 120 days before the end of 9 months from the date you receive this notice, the Park Owner will provide you with a form of purchase agreement setting forth the terms of the sale of your lot. For 60 days after the mailing of that notice to you, you will have 2 • the option to purchase your lot on the terms contained in the purchase agreement. If you elect not to exercise your option to purchase your lot within such 60 days, the Park Owner may not offer to sell your lot during the following 180 days at a price or on terms more favorable than the price or terms contained in the purchase agreement. You may contact the Park Owner at 286-1177 if you have any questions about this Statement. Dated: THE GARDENS MANUFACTURED HOME CO ITY LLC By Its � 3 A l l'nusmz Corr.<<unfty 4325 Carden Court SE • Rochester,MN 55904 • (507) 286-9000 fax: 507 ( ) .29�- 9OS 7 j DXT h6s- 7F�RO:MA PHU (507)T286-9000FAXAso - z- 9057 w ., . 1 RECEIVED {4 ROCHESTER-GLYSTED Pl `,NN'NG DEPART E:N'T • 12 January 2006 PROPOSED CONVERSION OF THE GARDENS "land lease park"1.'O THE GARDENS COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY All existing residents have the opportunity to purchase the lot that they currently rent, convert their existing home from"chattel"to "real estate", and qualify.for additional income tax deductions of.mortgage interest and tomes paid. Residents who choose to continue renting rather then purchasing their home site may do so, and will remain subject to the existing Home Lot Lease Agreement,Rules and Regulations, and Covenants and Guidelines of The Gardens Community. All residents of The Gardens Common Interest Community, whether they rent their.lot or own their lot, will be subject to the new Common interest Community Declaration, Restrictions, and Architectural Standards:for the Community. Anticipated C.I.C.Association fee is$50/month, based on actual costs during 2004/2005. 2006 PROPOSED BUDGET: Streets and grounds maintenance,mowing, and snow removal: $1800/nlo. Street lights maintenance and electric: 450/mo. Clubhouse cieanirig, electric, water, gas, and cable: 450/mo. Office phone,supplies, and misc. e:cpenses: 200/mo. • Accounting,management, and iiisurance: 1500/mo. Misc. and reserve: 20Q/mo. TOTAL MONTFILY BUDGET $4600/mo. INCOME: Mo.uthly fee from occupied lots: $50/lot x 82 lots= $41 Q0/mo. Moutbly fee from-unsoldlots: $12.50/lot x 47 lots= 587/mo. Monthly office rental and outside clubhouse use: 1500/ino. TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME: $6187/mo. WORKING CAPITAL FUND: ($100/sold lot x 82 lots) $SV00 LOT PURCHASE COST COMPARED TO CURRENT LOT RENTAL COST Average lot price: $35,500 @ 6.5%,APR, 30 year Am...................$224/mo.* Propertytax and C.I.C. fee...............................................................$80/mo. Total monthly cost to own your lot:................................................S304/mo. Currentaverage lot rent*..... ........................ . .................... ..........$311/mo.** *Financing terms are based on proposals from Homestead Mortgage Corporation *Lot rents will increase annually by the Conmimer Price Index . CEIVED j:�.+3 1 1 2u06 iER G^?,+SiED JAN-01-1900 00:04 P.02/02 The proposed conversion of The Gardens Manufactured Home Community (a land lease "park"), to a Common Interest Community where residents may • purchase their lot rather than rent their lot, provides a unique opportunity to all Gardens Community residents. For monthly payments of less than their current lot rent and no down payment, existing residents can purchase their lot and convert their home from"chattel" to "real estate", qualify for better mortgage rates on their home, and qualify for additional income tax deductions. Azi resident who chooses to continue renting rather than purchasing their lot Y g P g may do so. No existing resident will be required to purchase their lot or to move from the community as a,result of the conversion. The existing Lot Lease Agreements will stay in full force and affect for all residents who choose to continue renting. Lot rents will not increase as a result of the proposed conversion to a Common Interest Community. It is anticipated that Rules & Regulations, and Covenants substantially similar to those presently in affect will be adopted by the C. I. C. Association. The owner of each lot will be assessed a Common Interest Community Association fee. However, any resident who continues to rent their lot will • not be assessed an Association fee in addition to their rent. • TOTAL P.[ice r • January 31, 2006 Mitzi- We continue to find The Gardens MH Park to be reasonably well designed and managed.The most notable inconsistency, are several garages that were constructed in a way that are not fully compliant with set back distances established in MN Manufactured Home Park Law. Interestingly, those setbacks may be acceptable for local building and/or zoning codes applicable to MH Subdivisions. The following observations are intended to clarify issues associated with the park owner's proposal to convert the current MH Park into a MH subdivision where owners own and occupy properly recorded and individually taxed"lots of record". According to my notes from a meeting held at Planning Department a few months ago, every occupied and un-occupied lot, will ultimately be sold. Existing occupants of the MH Park will be encouraged to assume ownership of the lots they are now renting. Public Health plans to continue to license those parts of The Gardens that will be operated as a Manufactured Home Park, as addressed by MN Statutes Chapter 327, and MN Rules Chapter 4630. The following factors are related to the licensing issue: 1. The Park currently has about 45 vacant lots. If these vacant lots are not occupied until they are sold and occupied by individual lot owners,they do not need to be licensed as part of a MH Park; 2. Of the existing 82 occupied rental lots,the MH Park owners project that about Yz will be sold to the current lot renters.When those lots are sold to the owners they will not be licensed; 3. However, the non-occupying owner of about 40 occupied lots will need to maintain MH Park licensure.These may be scattered through out the current Park and intermingled with lots becoming the proposed MH Subdivision. 4. In some cases, a party might purchase several lots and then proceed to rent each of the lots out to people seeking a place to park their MH. In this scenario,the lot owner(s) will need to be licensed as MH Park and the current"Gardens"will become the location of several licensed MH Parks all located within the confines of the current"Gardens"MH Park. It appears that parts of The Gardens will continue to be a licensed MH Park as it gradually converts to becoming a MH Subdivision. There were unresolved issues about ownership and maintenance of the sewage collection system located in the streets and individual lots.All of the sewage collection system (located within the perimeters of The Gardens) is reportedly owned and maintained by The Gardens MH Park. Reportedly, Rochester City only owns and provides maintenance of sanitary sewer lines up to the perimeter of the current park. At the time of our meeting, it was not yet clear how ownership and responsibility for the sewage utility within the Park (but outside of the individual lots) will be addressed. Whatever arrangements are made for the sanitary sewer will need to be workable and satisfactory to the owners and to the City. If you have further questions, please contact Steve Lackore or me. Thanks Rich Peter, Director of Environmental Health Olmsted County Public Health • 2100 Campus Drive SE Rochester MN, 55904 507-285-8335, FAX 287-1492