Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 278-07 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the laws of the State of Minnesota require that an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) be prepared whenever a proposed development project results in the permanent conversion of `80 or more acres of agricultural land to a more intensive use (Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, subp. 36); and, WHEREAS, a certain development which is planned and under construction, known as Hadley Creek Development within the City of Rochester meets the criterion established for preparation of an EAW; and, WHEREAS, an EAW was prepared for the Hadley Creek Development and reviewed by the staff of the Planning and Zoning Department of Olmsted County, and the draft document was circulated for comments to the required State and Federal agencies, as provided by law: and, WHEREAS, notice of availability of the EAW was published in the EQB MONITOR and the thirty day period comment period expired on June 6, 2007, and during such period five written comments were received; and, • WHEREAS, the Common Council is required by law to make a finding on the adequacy of the EAW and to determine whether an environmental impact statement should be prepared. WHEREAS, the Common Council met at a regularly scheduled meeting on June 18, 2007, and considered the EAW, the reports of its staff, and the comments received from the parties as noted above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, that the Common Council makes the following FINDINGS with regard to the environmental impact of the proposed development to be known as Hadley Creek Development: 1. There have been no major environmental effects identified by the applicant, City of Rochester, or referral agencies that is of a type or that has a degree of impact that is not covered by existing state rules or city ordinance and plans. The location of the project is within the Rochester Urban Service Area under the Olmsted County General Land Use Plan and the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, thereby focusing urban development to specifically identified parts of the county based on adopted city and county policies. 2. Water quality of surface waters — Hadley Valley Creek in this case — should not be significantly degraded due to stormwater runoff from the site project. Erosion . and water quality of runoff will be controlled by the installation of stormwater detention ponds and sediment traps. Grading is limited to the valley and • footslopes, and will not be required on the steep wooded hillside. The Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual provides for an ongoing regulatory authority of the City over erosion control practices. State rules administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency also require that pre and post construction runoff and pollutants be controlled within the development. Construction of proposed stormwater facilities and reconstruction of the Hadley Creek floodplain with MNDNR approval will improve the stability of the bank of Hadley Valley Creek. 3. The potential for groundwater contamination is controllable by the use of a stormwater collection system which employs multiple stormwater basins as compared to the existing unrestricted overland flow from the cropland and golf center. Spills on the ground surface during construction are covered by state rules while spills post-construction will have the potential to be intercepted in the stormwater detention areas before they leave the project/property area. The applicant will comply with all state requirements that apply to the closed tank leak site at the golf course office/maintenance building. 4. The anticipated cumulative loss of agricultural lands and wildlife habitat within the urban service area of the City of Rochester (where sewer and water service is available) to urban land uses is an anticipated effect of the orderly growth of the City. Land use policies direct development to growth centers such as Rochester to reduce the pressure on agricultural lands in the outlying area to be converted to residential uses. The more efficient use of land for residential and commercial purposes where increased densities can be realized because of sewer and water availability is expected to help conserve truly prime agricultural and wildlife areas outside of the urban service area. 5. The regional flood will be contained within the property as conceived by the grading plan. Olmsted County currently is involved in a detailed floodplain study under a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and involving the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. A hydraulic and hydrologic analysis by the County's consultant will identify the 500 and 100 year floodplains and required building elevations. Impacts exceeding those permitted by FEMA must be identified and property owners notified. No known impacts have been identified by the detailed study as of the date of this EAW. In addition, public waters and wetlands modifications will be reviewed and permitted by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Rochester. 6. Other substantive matters identified include well sealing, traffic patterns and volumes, and archaeological sites. These matters will be addressed through the development permitting processes by the State, CitX and County. Olmsted County will start construction of improvements to the 55 Street/48th Street corridor in • 2009 that will improve traffic safety and level of service at the intersection with TH 63. The development area has been continuously disturbed through farming for 2 over a century, grading for a golf learning center and stream maintenance near Hadley Valley Road N.E. In addition, the State Historic Preservation Officer has indicated that there were no known historic or archaeological resources on the development site. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based on the findings above, the Common Council has determined that the development known as Hadley Creek Development does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and that preparation of an environmental impact statement is not mandated in this instance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that nothing in this determination that the EAW is adequate should be interpreted in any way to suggest that the City approves of the proposed development. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY OF G;61 , 2007. /v�/7' PRESIDENT OF SAID COMMON COUNCIL *ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS fi* DAY OF C Z�� , 2007. MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) ZoneM,Eaw-eis.need.hadley creel; • 3