HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/17/2014 DMCC Board Meeting - Visioning Sessions
DMCC / EDA
Visioning Session
November 13, 2014
DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DMCC / EDA WORKING SESSION AGENDA
NOVEMBER 13, 2014
12:30 PM DMCC / EDA WORKING SESSION
Location: Mayo Civic Center, Riverview Room, Suite C
Time: 11:00 – 3:00 pm
MEETING AGENDA
· Introduction / Call to Order (Simmons) – 5 Min
· Development Plan Objectives / Meeting Purpose and Overview (Clarke) – 10 Min
· Report on Best Practice Trips / Case Studies / Discussion of Lessons Learned (Clarke/AECOM) – 30 Min
· Overview of the Vision / Key Districts – 30 Min (EEK)
o Vision and Concept Update
o Discussion RE: Key Strategies
· Transportation Strategy Discussion – 45 Min (Nelson-Nygaard)
o Overview of Strategies and Key Planning Elements
o Discussion RE: Key Strategies
· Finance Plan Discussion – 60 Min (Hammes, Kimley Horn)
o Overview of Finance Plan Structure
o Discussion RE: Key Strategies
· Economic-Fiscal Analysis – 20 Min (AECOM)
o Overview of Key Findings
o Discussion RE: Key Strategies
· Process for Submission and Approval (Hammes) – 30 Min
o Process for Submittal and Review
o Overview of Criteria and Findings for Approval, Confirm Content
· Close (Clarke) – 5 Min
Best Practice
Trip Summary
DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER
EONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BEST PRACTICE TRIPS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
A delegation of Destination Medical Center Corporation (DMCC) and Economic
Development Authority (EDA) Board members and staff traveled recently with DMC
planning consultants to five model cities to learn from the experiences of professional
counterparts who have planned and implemented downtown redevelopment and
reinvestment. Cities were selected based on a variety of input, including places that
experienced rapid growth, iconic addresses, variety of transportation options, as well as
recommendations from DMC planning consultants and board members. The goal was to
collect a series of best practices that would deepen DMC and Rochester’s knowledge base
and ultimately foster more successful and responsible reinvestment in our city.
Portland, Oregon ► Seattle, Washington ► Bellevue, Washington
September 23 – 26, 2014
Cleveland, Ohio ► Indianapolis, Indiana
October 1 – 3, 2014
KEY TAKEAWAYS
► Invest in Transportation Early
Interconnectedness and access throughout the city
represent core components of a thriving
downtown. Residents and visitors must be able to
come and go with little or no hassle. We heard this
repeatedly from planners, developers, city officials, and civilian representatives—invest
in transportation early. Urban transit systems, such as streetcars and bus rapid transit
(BRT) systems are proven catalysts for attracting private investment. Bellevue, Wash.,
for instance, noted that bus and other transit systems are all operated by a common
agency and that “place-making” should be part of the initial planning investment
strategy. The type of talent and workforce DMC and Rochester aim to recruit seek an
urban environment in which they can live and work downtown. This means creating a
livable, walkable downtown with a mix of uses and amenities as well convenient access
to parking and public transportation.
► Collaborate
Everyone we met with emphasized collaboration and mutual benefit as critical to the
success of any development project. From Rochester’s perspective, this includes
collaboration among the City, County, DMCC, EDA,
businesses, and developers. All parties must identify
common interests and pursue those together within the
context of a mutually agreed upon master plan.
Cleveland representatives stressed corporate-developer
relationships and the alignment of common goals with the City and related
stakeholders. In this vein, many colleagues stressed that big thinking from all parties
and development of a master plan to inform decision making.
► Think Big, Be Patient.
Encourage big thinking, and allow ideas adequate time to coalesce. Representatives
from both Portland and Seattle told us, “Grow on your own.” Creating an environment
where it’s “safe to be visionary” is critical to investment and long-term success.
Businesses and developers seek out cities and teams that encourage visionary thinking
and risk-taking.
Delegation
DMCC Board
Mayor Ardell Brede
James Campbell
Ed Hruska
Susan Park Rani
RT Rybak
EDA Board
Jerry Bell
Lisa Clarke
Patricia Simmons, MD
Gary Smith
Hammes Co.
Wendy Rogers
Keith Rowan
Amy Supple
Perkins Eastman
Hillary Bertsch
Peter Cavaluzzi
AECOM
Bill Anderson
Kimberly Gester
Nelson/Nygaard
Tom Brennan
Evan Corey
Staff
Beth Backus
Heidi Mestad
Jamie Rothe
Synergy builds a sense of place
that makes life better.
— Seattle representative
City Areas of Focus Tools Lessons Learned Financing Development Regulatory Catalytic Investments Organizational Support
Po
r
t
l
a
n
d
Downtown Developments
Pearl District
OHSU
South Waterfront
"Be Intentional with what you want to achieve"
"Grow Your Own"
* Leadership support to push industries that have livable and sustainable wages
* Mayor's Innovation Fund
* Created mentor programs w/ Schools and Universities
* Start up Companies PDX Challenge
* Focus on building minority and under represented entrepreneurs
* Early Adopter Program - Connects starts ups to City procurement & Beta Test Opportunities
* Developer Agreements
* Place Matters
* Think Global - Create a Brand
* Share Prosperity
* Parking/Transit - You can't change behavior you have to make it easy for behavior to change
* Leadership focused on social equality
* Developers and City - Common support of - A Livable City Concept
* Recruit Talent by building on " Grow your own"
* Place is important = Strong quality of Life + Amenities
* Not One large public investment can turn attitudes
* Hold Developers accountable for your vision
* Incentives are key to sparking development and increasing diversity
* Street car strategy has a catalytic effect on private development
* Area TIF (Tax Increment Financing)
* Neighborhood Designations
* Publically backed seed fund "Portland Seed Fund"
* Development Agreements
* 13PDX - Incentives like free rent/ business coaching/ Funded start up competitions
* City helped subsidize first projects to establish comps to attract financing
* Charge for Parking to help pay for parking needs
* Economic Development Efforts paid for by the General Funds
* Non Profit created to assist in Equity investments for start ups
* Leverage of Large Grants ( NEA, art Place) for cultural components
* If developer did not meet tax increment targets - Gap Financing was put in place.
- Would not do again
* Incorporating Urban Growth Boundary
* Policies will help bring in industries - IE Green Policy incorporated into
storm water - brought Clean Tech industry
* Development Agreements - $ for parks, $ for Affordable Housing
$ vs exchange for entitlements
* Affordable Housing - Still needed to fit the design guidelines created
* Bonus Zoning for public benefits
* Reduced parking ratio
* Code Requirement - Must have retail at street level
* Cancer Research Institute ( Fred hutch Cancer Center)
* Uof W
* Cluster Strategy
* Transit Investment
* Intel
* Accelerators of Trade Industry " Sustainability"
* Software
* Athletic & Outdoor
* Clean Tech
* Yahoo
* OHSU
* Strong Voice of Leadership
* PDC - City's Development Agency
Se
a
t
t
l
e
Downtown Developments
South Lake Union
University District,
Medical School
Convention Center
Light Pavilion over street
"Grow Your Own"
" Synergy builds a sense of place that makes life better"
* 7 different modes of transportation
* Entrepreneurial Climate - Grow your own / An environment "Safe to fail"
* Innovation partnership zones - Gov established a sector lead to develop each industry cluster
* Do nor provide subsidy tools
* Workforce Development program
* Talent desires an urban, arts & cultural, diverse experience in places self contained
* Partnerships with UW - Center for Commercialization
* Developer Agreements
* Importance of Quality of Life
* Build the transportation and have private sector take care of amenities
* Parks/Space are catalysis for revitalization
* Livable City - Downtown neighborhood framework should function 24/7
* Focus on connectivity/Transportation for neighborhood planning
* Build Infrastructure to catalyze investment
* 20 yrs. ago - Conscious decision to diversify
* Build your infrastructure to be conducive to entrepreneurship
* Services folks can only live where bus transit is available, which is the program that gets cut - Will be
huge issue.
* Work with Developer for Programming Master Plan
* Street car strategy has a catalytic effect on private development
* Federal Dollars
* No state Income Tax
* No state tax and low corporate tax rates
* Corporate Tax of 1.5%
*Arts Fund - A United Way for Arts - 1% of capital Investment to Arts Fund
* Main Source of Funds: Real estate Tax , Sales Tax, and B&O ( Small Business Tax)
* Tourism Tax - $ 2/lodging
* Bonus Zoning program
* Rezone/Codes to allow creative development
* Developers have to cater to :Urban Design Framework"
* Workforce Development Incentives
* Zoning didn't have parking requirements - Creates low carbon and more
transportation options
* Regulator Real Estate Tax can only rise 1%/year
* Transit Investment
* Biotech drivers were Proximity, Variety, Policies, Infrastructure
* Boing
* Amazon
* Microsoft - And companies trying to poach talent from Microsoft
* Supply chain to the big innovation companies
* Arts and Culture catalyze a sense of place"
* Paul Allen donated $20 M if voters would approve park
* Paul Allen/ Vulcan Real-estate
* A lot of Microsoft Millionaires contribute to Arts and
Cultural programs
* Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Be
l
l
e
v
u
e
Downtown Bellevue
City Planning
Hospital Corridor
Downtown Development
* Neighborhood Planning Goals:
Economic Engine
Urban focus Transit
Pedestrian friendly
Sustainability
* Transit Demand Management
* MUPS - Master Use Permit
* Bus and Transit system run by different agencies causes funding issues and is problematic
* Strategic public investments create value and supportive zoning for urban regeneration
* Market place dictates what will happen - Eliminate Code issues when needed
* Started with the job base and then designed residential
* Shared Parking - Key concept, planned at .8 space/unit f0r residential
* Hotels planned with No parking
* Bike/ped systems integrate better with neighborhoods and place making elements.
* Place making should be part of initial planning/investment
* Developer Fee goes to affordable housing trust fund
* Levies 60%, Special purpose levies
* Assessment on Property Tax
* Business and Occupation Tax against gross Revenue
* Tax increment is limited to local agency - Not effective/Not used
* $600 M in public infrastructure
* 98% of property owners for special districts to cover 1/2 of capital Costs
*Tiger Grant' for gap financing
LID - Local Improvement District - Special Tax district for funding
* Voters - Add $5M/pear for transit toward Capital Improvements and service partnerships.
Operating Cost Financing
* City shard funded by sponsorships and grants
* Growth Management Act
* Incentive Zoning program
* Pay into funds for additional density and height
* Code change to allow high ceilings ( Benefited Bio Tec)
* Underzonning - No parking required
* Put TDM in code to get reduced parking
* Microsoft
* Street car connection to downtown
* Street car Loop - 2.6 Mile
* Biotech ( Cause of UofW)
* Biomed Global
* Institute for Brain Science
* Strong partnership with Local Developers
Cl
e
v
e
l
a
n
d
Downtown Developments
Waterfront Development
Greater University Circle Initiative
Playhouse Square
Medical Mart
Cleveland Clinic
Cultural Developments
" Buy, Hire, Live Local"
* Workforce Strategy
* Initiative Pattern:
Institutional Partnerships
Physical Development
Inclusive Programing
Community Engagements
* Car program - Help under privileges learn to grow
* Share a planter - Business work together to cut costs
* BID - Closer partnerships:
Focus on Safe and Clean, Programming, Marketing/Promoting
*Success is a collaborative effort
* Private Companies and Developers work together
* Focus on Common interests - Strategy can be Regional
* Biosciences - University connection is critical to success
* Focus on areas that would create and impact
* Culture _ Commers - Vitality"
* Anchor lead the community reinvestment strategies
* Programming effectively helps drive development
* BRT ( Health Line) drove private investment downtown and Universtiy Circle
* Foundation - provided significant funding for economic development
* Leverage of National Grants
* Cigarette Tax, State Dollars - went to Arts funding
* Grant - To enhance street level experience: Signage, Way finding, fire pit,
* Chandelier ( PHS -) Naming Rights
* National Historic Tax Credits used for redevelopment
* New Market Tax Credits
* Tiger Grants for transit Redevelopment
* TIF Grants
* Set community standards * Cleveland Clinic
* Cleveland Foundation
* Case Western Reserve
* University Hospital
* Power of local philanthropy to serve as catalyst
* Convention Center - Focus on healthcare Industry/devices
* BRT Rapid Transit
* Private Companies/Foundation Lead Vision
* Government was supportive
* GUCI - Greater Cleveland Initiative
* Power of collaborative leadership
* Local Developer partnership
* Jumpstart program
* Cleveland Foundation
In
d
i
a
n
a
p
o
l
i
s
Downtown Developments
Circle Center Mall/Arts Garden
Canal Walk
Biosciences
City Market
"Clean, Simple Modern"
"Be Intentional"
* Arts Garden's O & M paid by developer
* Stipend and programmed by Arts Council
* CICP - Central Indiana Corp Partnership
* GICP - Greater Indy Partnership Community
* Welcome packets for Immigrants
* Arts Council
* LISC - Focus on empowering neighborhoods
* Economic Development tool box
* PPL - Community involvement organizations that empower the people
* Connecting Neighborhoods to transit
"Don't think small - A City was not built overnight"
"Build something special to bring the community together or don't do anything"
"Go Big or Go home"
"Skyways are not connectors, they are places"
* Revitalization means: Incorporate quality of life, Income, Health, Education, Housing
* Commitment from the city on public infrastructure helped catalyst for private development
* Cultural Trail -"You can not overdue a trail" - Its connecting places and paid for itself
* Create gathering spots
* Cluster your industry/ Create supply chain strategies
* Talent wants Livable Cities and Walkable downtowns
* LISC (Local Initiative Support Corporation) - Help raise/find funds for neighborhoods
* Seed Funding - 50% city, state/Federal, 50% Corp, Private
* Façade Improvement
* Historic preservation dollars
* TIF ( Tax Increment Financing) used for Infrastructure
* Tiger Grant - Cultural trail sparked 100M of development
* IU Loan Fund - used for parcel purchase
* New Market Tax Credits
* Organizations donating to development ( I.e. low income housing)
* Venture Capital
* Philanthropy Dollars
* Civic Center Development Partnerships
* State Created Bank Bonds
* Unigov merger - City/County merge and expanded the tax base
* Affordable Housing Initiatives
* State can not issue debt
* Income tax in Indy - Lower in the suburbs
* Deliberate Strategy of Branding the city as the " Amateur sports Capital
of the world"
* Eli Lilly Foundation
* Simon Headquarters
* Central Indiana Corporate Partnership (CICP) group of
corporate leaders that drove the cluster strategy
)2857+675((7&/(9(/$1'2+
7+,5'675((7+,6725,&',675,&7 .(<3/$1
UGVW6:
EU
R
D
G
Z
D
\
V
W
D
Y
H
K
X
U
R
Q
U
G
H
D
V
W
TXLFNHQORDQVDUHQD
JDOOHULD
HDVWWKVW
HX
F
O
L
G
D
Y
H
SU
R
V
S
H
F
W
D
Y
H
H
D
V
W
VN\
E
U
L
G
J
H
¶
¶
)2857+675((7
¶
¶
3/$<+286(648$5(&/(9(/$1'2+
.(<3/$1
QGVW6:
V
W
D
Y
H
Q
G
D
Y
H
¶
¶
7+(3257$/ 7+($5&+
3/$<+286(648$5(
HXFOLGDYH
SOD\KRXVHVTXDUHFDQGHOLHU
KXURQ
U
G
H
D
V
W
H
D
V
W
W
K
V
W
¶
¶
02180(17&,5&/(,1',$1$32/,6,1
.(<3/$1
670$5<63/$&(
QGVW6:
W
K
D
Y
H
6
:
W
K
D
Y
H
6
:
¶
¶
02180(17&,5&/(
PDUNHWVW
VROGLHUV VDLORUVPRQXPHQW
PH
U
L
G
L
D
Q
V
W
¶
*(25*,$675((7,1',$1$32/,6,1
.(<3/$16(&21'675((7 :$7(5)5217648$5(
*(25*,$675((7
QGVW6:
EU
R
D
G
Z
D
\
V
W
D
Y
H
¶
¶
JHRUJLDVWUHHW
LQGLDQDFRQYHQWLRQFHQWHU
EDQNHUVOLIH¿HOGKRXVH
FD
S
L
W
R
O
D
Y
H
LO
O
L
Q
R
L
V
V
W
PH
U
L
G
L
D
Q
V
W
SH
Q
Q
V
\
O
Y
D
Q
L
D
V
W
¶
¶
&(175$/&$1$/0(',&$/&$0386,1',$1$32/,6,1
:$7(5)5217648$5(
QGVW6(
FLY
L
F
F
H
Q
W
H
U
G
U
¶
¶
&(175$/&$1$/
.(<3/$1
WKVW
WKVW
ZH
V
W
V
W
LQGLDQDFHQWUDOFDQDO
¶
¶
&(175$/&$1$/5(6,'(17,$/,1',$1$32/,6,1
PLFKLJDQVW
LQ
G
L
D
Q
D
D
Y
H
LQ
G
L
D
Q
D
F
H
Q
W
U
D
O
F
D
Q
D
O
.(<3/$1
&(175$/&$1$/
FHQWHUVW
VWVW1H
VWVW6H
QGVW6(
EU
R
D
G
Z
D
\
FL
Y
L
F
F
H
Q
W
H
U
G
U
7+(&5(6&(17
¶
¶
¶
¶
3($5/',675,&73257/$1'25
Q
D
L
W
R
S
N
Z
\
W
K
D
Y
H
W
K
D
Y
H
.(<3/$1
3($5/',675,&7
FHQWHUVW
VWVW1H
VWVW6H
QGVW6(
EU
R
D
G
Z
D
\
FL
Y
L
F
F
H
Q
W
H
U
G
U
7+(&5(6&(17
¶
¶
¶
¶
¶
3,.(3/$&(0$5.(76($77/(:$
QGVW6(
SLNHVW
S
L
N
H
S
O
D
F
H
UGVW6(
EU
R
D
G
Z
D
\
V
W
D
Y
H
.(<3/$1
3,.(63/$&(0$5.(7 =80%520$5.(7
¶
¶
¶¶
¶
VI
VI
Overview of Final
Proposed DMC
Development District
DMC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AREA
Last Updated: November 4, 2014
Introduction
The purpose of this outline is to provide the DMCC and EDA Boards with an update on the recommended
area for the DMC Development District (as defined below), and to request any final feedback from the boards
to guide the establishment of the Development District for approval in the Development Plan.
On September 11, 2014 the EDA reviewed the methodology and area of the proposed Development District
with the boards at the DMCC/EDA working session. The same was shared with the City / County staff and
leadership. The documents were also shared, and feedback was requested from, the public at the September
11th public forum, on the DMCC and DMC.MN websites, the DMC blog and in the joint DMC/City
Comprehensive Plan Tool Kit. All feedback was compiled in October and then reviewed with City / County
staff prior to forming this final recommendation.
Figure 1-1 illustrates the original Development District Area and highlights the changes that are proposed as a
result of the process described above. Included below is an explanation of the methodology for selecting the
area of the Development District and a description of future considerations that may need to be considered
as the Development Plan is implemented.
DMC Development District Purpose
The DMC Law requires that a “Destination Medical Center Development District” (Development District) be
established in the Development Plan to define the geographic area in the City that identifies where Public
Infrastructure Projects (as defined by the legislation) are implemented. The area of the Development District
influences the implementation of the plan in two primary ways:
1. Certification of Private Investment. The amount of General State Infrastructure Aid, which is capped at
$455 million (inclusive of the City contribution), is estimated based on a formula that calculates the total
amount of Mayo Clinic investment in the City of Rochester and the amount of private investment that
occurs within the Development District. Once established, the certification of private investment in the
Development District may be counted retroactively to June 30, 2013.
2. Area for Public Infrastructure Projects. The Development District defines the area where DMC Funds
may be expended for Public Infrastructure Projects in accordance with the DMC Law.
Methodology to Establish the DMC Development District
The Development District has been established through a series of discussions with the DMCC Board, EDA
Board, City/County staff and leadership and the public. The fundamental premise of the strategy has been to
identify an area that has the highest potential to maximize the impact of the public investment by
concentrating funding in a targeted area that:
§ Includes the area identified by the City of Rochester in the Rochester Downtown Master Plan (RDMP)
§ Represents the area identified by both City and Mayo Clinic as the area likely to experience the highest
growth and investment in the next 20 years
§ Represents the area with the highest employment and demand for increased/improved services
§ Represents the primary area for visitation and tourism, and the area surrounding the expanded Mayo
Civic Center
§ It includes the area identified by University of Minnesota-Rochester for their campus master plan
§ It includes the area identified by the City of Rochester as a tax abatement district
§ It includes the major roadways/entry points into the City center
§ And, includes recommended areas identified by the public and local jurisdictions that both the EDA and
City staff agreed are consistent with the strategies outlined for the vision of the DMC Plan.
Amendments to the Development District:
Once established, the Development District may be amended at any time to accommodate specific areas of
development and/or project requests. Amendments may be made to expand or contract the current
Development District and/or to create a new district(s). A new district(s) does not have to be contiguous to
the existing Development District(s).
During the review of the Development District area, several areas were identified as being potential
candidates for future expansion and/or a new district area. The list is provided for informational purposes
only and is not meant to be limiting to other areas and/or projects that may be considered over time.
· Areas for connection to utility and/or sewer main lines to accommodate capacity upgrades/expansions
· Parking or transit improvements outside of the existing boundary, connecting to the downtown
· Cascade Lake
· Silver Lake Plant Site and Lake
· Soliders Field (other areas not already included in plan)
It is recommended that if an expansion is required for a specific project(s), that such expansion be considered
at the time the project is proposed and that the consideration of the amendment includes an evaluation of
the project related to the vision and strategies adopted into the DMC Plan, expansion area, potential
economic impact and potential costs associated with such expansion on a case-by-case basis.
DMC Law
Interest parties should consultant the DMC law to understand the detailed requirements and law related to
the Development District.
DRAFT - DMC Development District
Last Updated: November 1, 2014
Update to DMC Vision
and Districts
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 0
DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER
DRAFT Design Vision
November 2014
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 1
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 2
FIVE DESTINATION EXPERIENCES AND ADDRESSES
The Vision:
A bold and aspirational concept for the future.
A framework for growth.
Market driven plan.
Financed through a mix of public and private sources.
DMC recommended projects prioritized and phased through a separate process.
Problems to solve:
Attract new residents and visitors to Rochester and get them to stay.
Position Rochester as a global destination medical center.
Create dynamic sustainable economic growth based on the unique talent and facilities.
Recognizes unique needs/demands of the patients and companions that visit Rochester.
A vision that is a creative evolution of the existing City and culture, not an import.
Designing a well‐crafted, achievable, first phase that can be accomplished quickly using
conventional means.
Designed to offer:
A positive and inspired sense of arrival.
A convenient and integrated ADA accessible City full of year‐round activities.
Sustainable economic development which perpetually exists at the cutting edge.
A renowned and iconic address that becomes a global model.
A public realm that is inviting, convenient, and barrier free providing easy access to all
meeting and exceeding all ADA requirements
An area that includes:
A series of memorable experiences that appeal to a wide audience.
Iconic places and attractions where people want to be.
Programmatic offerings and venues that cannot be acquired anywhere else in the area.
A compact, walkable, series of streets and public spaces that are ADA accessible and
connected in the heart of downtown.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 3
1. THE HEART OF THE CITY
“First and First”
Catalyst for the future of Rochester
The heart of downtown Rochester is the true heart of the Destination Medical Center plan. It is
a place of connected spaces and urban experiences that build off of the convenient and
walkable attributes of the City. Enhanced public areas and new development will strengthen
Peace Plaza as the symbolic heart of the city with new attractions and feature at key places
along its length.
At the west end near the Gonda tower the lower level subway passages “day lighted” with
the ”Ice pavilion” a grand new sunken plaza visually connected to the Landow atrium with ice
skating, dining, and picture windows that look out from the subway passages. “First and First”
located in the middle of Peace Plaza is the main crossroads within the downtown. This area will
be enhanced on all four corners with new development and amenities including a dramatic
arched “Light Pavilion” canopy high above the intersection. The light pavilion defines the key
intersection and will be must see attraction with special lighting effects and features that create
a lively theatrical atmosphere.
“First and First” will provide a beautiful grand dinning terrace that spans First Avenue connected
to the Chateau Theater making the theater a key part of the overall design and cultural
experiences offered in the space. At the east end of Peace Plaza will be a new “Waterfront
Passage” that connects through to the downtown waterfront and “gardens neighborhood”. The
waterfront passage opens up the dead end to Peace Plaza and makes the plaza more integrated
to new development and the rest of the downtown.
At Second Street at the base of the Plummer tower is a new urban public arrival space called
“The Portal”. The 22nd century public square flatters the Plummer building with the landmark
tower as the focal point of a gently curving space that will serve as the front door to science and
biotech development of “Discovery Square”. Mixed‐use buildings include bio‐tech, healthcare,
education, hospitality and restaurant/retail will surround “The Portal” along with a convenient
streetcar station making the portal the symbolic and economic connection to science and
technology in the heart of the city. “The Heart of the City” embraces the aspirational skyline
introduced with the “Plummer Building” while creating new modern day symbols of Mayo
Clinic’s global preeminence and Rochester’s future as a global destination.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 4
The Light Pavilion – A soaring crystalline arrival roof structure at the intersection of
“First and First” with a dramatic multi‐level connections to adjacent mixed‐use
development.
The Portal – a new public space, transit station, and development address, including the
Plummer Building and Bio‐Business Center at the heart of downtown.
Waterfront Passage – Extending Peace Plaza across Broadway into the “Garden District”,
with at grade and 2nd level connections to the downtown waterfront and Convention
center.
The Plaza Steps – Located at the east end of the Peace Plaza, the “Plaza Steps” are a
stage like setting that take pedestrians up to the skyway connections to the downtown
waterfront. The steps are ADA accessible and are flanked with restaurants and cafes to
give visitors a welcoming passage to the downtown waterfront.
Ice Pavilion – Exposing the multi‐level network around Gonda, an enhancement of the
ground floor spaces and an expanded offering of visitor amenities including a central
skating area in the tradition of Rockefeller Center.
Gonda Expansion (Peace Tower) – A mixed‐use tower that incorporates health care
facility expansion as well as visitor arrival amenities and services. It is a global symbol of
the city and the Mayo Clinic.
The Balcony/Chateau Theater – The balcony will build on the theatrical imagery and
memories of the Chateau Theater and integrate the restored theater into the overall
“First and First” experience. The balcony will span First Avenue with an outdoor dining
space and indoor weather protected connections to the eastern end of Peace Plaza. The
balcony will be the place to view all of the activities and excitement at “First and First”
and the light pavilion especially evenings and during event and festivals that are staged
in the plaza.
“The Grand Arch”‐ The Grand Arch marks the intersection of Second Street and First
Avenue with a skyway bridge and arch element that serves as a preview to the lively
spaces on Peace Plaza and “First and First. The marks the passage to the waterfront and
connects the heart of the City with a visible and celebratory feature in the streetscape.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 5
THE HEART OF THE CITY
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 6
2. DISCOVERY SQUARE
“The Institutes”
Technology and Science in the City fostering Private Development
Discovery Square is the new home and address for the expansion of the science, technology and
entrepreneurialism in Rochester. Discovery Square is the focal point for the expansion of the
Science and Technology Institutes for the Mayo Clinic and an ideal location to expand private
research, technology and related business in the downtown area. Located steps away from the
Gonda Building and the Mayo Medical School, Discovery Square is positioned to take advantage
of the proximities that are essential for the continued growth of the research and tech
community. A contemporary departure from the boxy building character that has dominated
the Rochester skyline, Discovery Square would accommodate advanced "Lab Lofts" that are
both iconic and architecturally inspiring. The buildings are designed with the idea of establishing
a more aspirational identity for the Rochester skyline. The science buildings are grouped around
a beautiful lively urban square that appeals to the widest constituencies of city dwellers. The
Square provides interconnected indoor and outdoor meeting places that function as centralized
gathering spots for visitors, scientists, and researchers to co‐mingle and collaborate. The Square
is designed to be playful and artful, similar to the Google Commons in order to, quite simply,
attract the best and the brightest, the most creative minds in the world.
Integrated Care Pavilion – Located at the portal, the Integrated Care Pavilion will be the
dramatic front door and first impression to Discovery Square. Doctors, researchers, and
scientists will comingle in this light and airy atrium space to share ideas and to introduce
procedures and methodologies that can be directly applied to patient care.
Translational Cloud – A glowing glass pavilion hovering in the air above the Square con‐
necting all of the buildings serving as a meeting place for conferences and events.
Partnership Alley – Building off the alleyway system, a network of inter connecting pas‐
sageways for an integration of buildings and communities.
The Square – A Wi‐Fi connected urban park suited to the 22nd‐century, providing a
unique setting for the best and the brightest to engage in creative interactions within a
beautiful urban public square.
Institutes – A series of flexible and interdisciplinary lab lofts that provide state‐of‐the‐art
facilities in an open, connected, and collaborative vertical campus.
Windows on the Institutes – Contemporary open storefronts and bay windows that
overlook the Square, inviting the outside world inside for a glimpse of the life and crea‐
tive activity going on inside.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 7
Hi‐tech Domain – State‐of‐the‐art technology would be embedded into and around the
buildings and public spaces of Discovery Square allowing workers, visitors, and patients
to receive all information in real time.
University Connection – Programmed spaces and a campus linkage system that
strengthen the relationship between Mayo Clinic, Mayo Medical School the University of
Rochester and other institutional partners.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 8
DISCOVERY SQUARE
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 9
3. DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT
“The Gardens”
Healthy Living / Nature in the City
“The Gardens” waterfront is totally integrated with the Zumbro Riverfront in order to create a
neighborhood where the natural landscape and the City are interconnected to form a unique
urban character. “The Gardens” becomes the heart of culture and history providing a unique
and healthy living and working environment. The gardens is the new Downtown Waterfront
neighborhood that will serve as a place to explore and stroll for visitors and tourists using the
convention center. Much as the Zumbro River gently meanders into Rochester, “The Gardens”
similarly combines the nurturing and sustainable qualities of the city and its natural
surroundings. The Crescent is the main public space connecting the district and extending down
to Waterfront Square. It is planned as a lushly planted rain garden and landscaped public space
that extends the impression of the river while creating an attractive setting for residents and
businesses alike. The Crescent also brings art, recreational, and cultural attractions to the area.
The Gardens is an authentic mixed‐use district evolved from the unique history and culture of
Rochester providing a one‐of‐a‐kind neighborhood for residents, health oriented businesses,
and visitors to the convention center. The Downtown Waterfront is a model of modern urban
living where the landscape and the buildings are intertwined for sustainable healthy living.
Waterfront Square – A year‐round event space extending the impression of the river
and establishing the address at the intersection of 2nd Street, the River, the Crescent and
the expanded Civic Center.
The Crescent – A modern state of the art sustainable landscape promenade that
includes rainwater collection, trails, cultural and health amenities as a place to relax and
stroll through the City. The crescent is the cultural and address for the downtown
waterfront amenities.
Zumbro Market – A central market and food hall relocated to Waterfront Square
featuring healthy fresh foods, dining, and products that come straight from the farm.
Zumbro market will also house cafes and local brew house to add to the lively urban
atmosphere.
Historic District – An intimate district comprised of small shops and restaurants that
provides a complement to the contemporary buildings in the Downtown Waterfront.
The historic third street district is connected to the waterfront with the Thirds street
overlook.
The Park Blocks – A series of mixed‐use neighborhood blocks that make up the urban
fabric of the Downtown Waterfront. The blocks will feature active ground floor uses and
create the lively street scene that makes up this new waterfront neighborhood.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 10
The Main Stage – An iconic and sculptural outdoor performance venue that is a focal
point from within Mayo Park.
“Barcelona Corner” – The gateway, transit station, and address for an expanded new
market development on the east side of the Zumbro and south to future development
areas.
“The Light Loop” – An artful and visually exciting river light show that uses the Zumbro
River as the canvas for lighting and special effects making the river itself into a town
square for art and festivities.
“The Civic Center Bridge” – A beautiful curving pedestrian bridge that connect Mayo
Park to the south side of the river and government center. The Civic Center Bridge add
access and visibility to the Art museum and enhances pedestrian activity along the
water’s edge.
“Civic Center Promenade” – The promenade is an extension of the public spaces around
the existing art museum giving greater access and visibility to the museum and to Mayo
Park. The promenade will host outdoor activities and art shows to add to the cultural
offerings of the downtown waterfront.
“Third Street Overlook” – The intersection of Historic Third Street and the Zumbro River
promenade is an extension of the historic district connect the district back to the river.
The curving plaza will provide panoramic views up and down the river and connect to
the Zumbro market.
“The Government Center Promenade” – The government center promenade will better
integrate the government center with the river and provide a setting for strolling and
views back to the city skyline. The promenade completes the pedestrian ring of
circulation that surrounds the Zumbro River and the downtown waterfront.
“The Promenade Extension” – The promenade extension connects to development
parcels on the south side of the Zumbro River across from Mayo Park. The promenade
extends the value of the river frontage and help to activate the waterfront t with new
mixed use development.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 11
DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 12
4. CENTRAL STATION
“Transit Terrace”
A place that is appealing for all, even those who may not be using transit
Central Station is the new nexus of transportation and arrival in the downtown area.
Conveniently located on the northern edge of downtown, the area is recast to incorporate
mixed‐use development, parking amenities, and a grand new intermodal transit station to serve
the downtown. Central Station embodies the principles of Open Transit, with access to all
modes of transit including pedestrian and bike connecting into the existing subway‐skyway
network providing a north‐south link down to Gonda and Discovery Square. It also
accommodates a potential future regional rail connection. Central Station includes a mix of
transit‐oriented development so that the area functions as an authentic mixed‐use
neighborhood. It also leverages transit architecture to create iconic spaces where people want
to gather, whether or not they are using transit. The station fronts the historic Central Park and
provide a green oasis in the heart of the vibrant arrival district.
Central Park – A refurbishment of the historic Central Park space, including an expansion
of the historic programming and structure, reminding people of Rochester’s beginnings.
Transit Terrace – A full service intermodal station that includes all modes of transit,
including future commuter and high speed rail.
The Great Lawn – A generous open lawn space within the heart of Central Park that
provides for flexible events and gatherings throughout the year.
The Grand Hall – An interior grand arrival hall looking out on Central Park and the
skyline beyond, including a light‐filled room with restaurants, art gallery, and
performance space.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 13
CENTRAL STATION
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 14
5. ST. MARYS PLACE
“The Great Room”
A Welcoming “Urban Foyer” for the City of Rochester
St. Marys Place is a new public space and development address at the threshold of downtown.
The space not only serves as a warm welcome to visitors and residents arriving on Second
Street, but also creates an eastern entrance for the hospital bringing the existing campus closer
to downtown. Saint Marys Place recalls the history and culture of the City while at the same
time creating modern and welcoming arrival address for development along 2nd Street. St Marys
Place is lined with a variety of hospitality uses, including smaller boutique hotels, B&B’s, a
Culinary Institute, and outpatient offices and general “Main Street” shops that bring
convenience and life to the Square. In the heart of the Square is a new transit station that links
to the downtown. Parking is integrated to provide convenient access to both the hospital and
transit station. St. Marys Park is connected to St. Marys place with a fully ADA accessible grad
stair and elevator providing access to the currently underutilized park for all.
St. Marys Steps – A picturesque neighborhood grand staircase to the top of Saint Marys
Park, providing panoramic views of the city and to the historic “Pill Hill” neighborhood
above.
Transit Pavilion – A glass enclosed “greenhouse” that serves as a comfortable, warm,
and convenient boarding place for the new transit line on 2nd Street.
The Tower – A modern interpretation and complement of the St. Francis Bell Tower
Campanile, providing an address and symbolic entrance for the hospital on St. Marys
Square. The tower provides ADA access up to St. Marys park
Culinary Academy – A cooking school and restaurant row, with cafes that serve local
favorites and offer culinary traditions of Rochester, the Mayo Clinic, and the Franciscan
Sisters.
Hospitality Street – A re‐imagined 2nd Street that can accommodate pedestrians, autos,
and mass transit in a neighborhood scaled for new development.
Destination Medical Center
Design Narrative
Perkins Eastman DRAFT 15
ST. MARYS PLACE
Process for City 60 Day
Review and Approval
of Plan
Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Dr. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Date: October 29, 2014
TO: Gary Neumann, Assistant City Administrator
FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, AICP Director Rochester-Olmsted Planning
RE: City Public Hearing Options & Schedule for DMC Development Plan
DMC staff recently informed us that they intend to submit the DMC Development Plan to the City on December 18, 2014. According to the
DMC Legislation, the City has no more than 60-days to act on the Plan. The purpose of this memo is to outline schedule options for the public
hearings and City Council action that fit within the 60-day limitation.
Schedule options “A”, “B”, and “C” are based on the DMC Development Plan being formally submitted to the City on December 18, 2014.
Schedule option “D” reflect a later submittal date.
The City Attorney, Terry Adkins, was consulted to verify whether a joint City Planning Commission/City Council public hearing is an option. This
option is viable, so long as the bodies take action separately. If this option is of interest, it may be helpful to have the City Attorney address the
procedural logistics, if there are any questions.
As soon as a schedule is finalized, the venue(s) will need to be secured and DMC EDA and DMCC, along with elected officials of the City of
Rochester, and the Rochester Planning Commission will need to be informed.
1
Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Dr. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Option “A”
DATE
1-7-15 All review, comments, reports &
recommendations must be
COMPLETE
Provides no more than 10 working days for all Departments to
review and analyze, and to develop & finalize staff recommendations.
** Two holidays follow submittal.
1-8-15 Reports must be distributed
1-14-15 Planning Commission Hearing Regular Meeting –
would not schedule
any other “regular”
items
2-4-15 City Council Public Hearing Special Meeting Complete public hearing, discussion, direct preparation of
findings/fact, conclusions.
2-9-15 Alternate City Council Public
Hearing
Special Meeting Complete public hearing, discussion, direct preparation of
findings/fact, conclusions.
2-16-15 Formal/Final Action by Council Finalized within 60-days.
Option “B”
1-28-15 All review, comments, reports &
recommendations must be
COMPLETE
Provides no more than 24 working days for all Departments to
review and analyze, and to develop & finalize staff recommendations.
1-29-15 Reports must be distributed
2-4-15 Planning Commission Hearing Special Meeting Provides City/staff additional time for assessing proposal and
developing recommendations.
2-9-15 City Council Hearing Special Meeting
*Would not be time to prepare minutes from the Planning
Commission Meeting.
Direct preparation of Findings/Fact, Conclusions.
2-16-15 City Council – Final Action Finalized within 60-days.
2
Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Dr. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Option “C”
1-28-15 All review, comments, reports &
recommendations must be
COMPLETE
Provides no more than 24 working days for all Departments to
review and analyze, and to develop & finalize staff recommendations.
1-29-15 Reports must be distributed
2-3, 2-
4, or 2-
5-15
JOINT Planning Commission & City
Council Public Hearing
Special Meeting Provides no more than 24 working days for all Departments to
review and analyze, and to develop & finalize staff recommendations.
Planning Commission discusses &
makes recommendation to City
Council
Council recesses their meeting or
continues item
Both bodies hear all same information in entirety; written minutes of
Planning Commission not so important;
Each body to take action separately, with the Planning Commission
taking action first, to make recommendation to the City Council. The
City Council would then recess or continue item to another date –
regular meeting on 2/16.
2-16-15 City Council Action Finalized within 60-days
3
Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Dr. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Option “D”* : Hypothetical January 12, 2015 submittal
If the DMCC were to approve sharing the Plan with the City on 12-18-14 for a preview prior to formal submittal, the City would have 13
additional working days to digest the Plan documents.
2-4-15 All review, comments, reports &
recommendations must be COMPLETE
Provides no more than 11 working days for all Departments
to review and analyze, and to develop & finalize staff
recommendations.
1-29-15 Reports must be distributed
2-11-15 Planning Commission Hearing Regular Meeting;
*no other agenda items
would be scheduled
Provides City/staff additional time for assessing proposal and
developing recommendations.
2-23-15 City Council Hearing Special Meeting
Direct preparation of
Findings/Fact,
Conclusions
*Minutes would be in “draft” form, not approved by the
Planning Commission.
3-2-15
(or 3-9-
15)
City Council – Final Action Finalized within 60-days
*This schedule could be modified to account for a joint planning commission/council public hearing, in which case additional time would be
provided for City review & analysis.
4