Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/25/2016 DMCC Board Meeting - Agenda and Meeting PacketDESTIN ATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPOR ATION (DMCC) BOARD MEETING 9:30 A.M. THURSDAY, AUGUST 25, 2016 MAYO CIVIC CENTER - ROCHESTER DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION (DMCC) BOARD MEETING Thursday, August 25, 2016 9:30 A.M. AGENDA Page I.Call to Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Agenda………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..01 IV.Approval of Minutes: June 23, 2016……………………………………………………………………………………..02 V.Public Comment Period VI.Chair’s Report VII.DMCC: Form 990; Charitable Organization Report…………………………………………06 (Presenter: Craig Popenhagen, CliftonLarsonAllen) Resolution A: Approval of Charitable Organization Report and Form 990………………54 VIII.City of Rochester : Update…………………………………………………………………………………………………….55 IX.Project Update (City of Rochester, EDA) A.Heart of the City: Report and Recommendation of Public Spaces Design Firm….67 Resolution B: Approving Recommendation of Public Spaces Design Firm……….107 B.Saint Marys Place / Second Street Infrastructure…………………………………….108 C.Alatus: Proposed Development on 2nd Street SW (Presenters: Bob Lux, Alatus; Chris Osmundson, Alatus) X.Economic Development Agency A.EDA Operations…………………………………………………………………………..111 B.Discovery Square:………………………………………………………………………..124 a)Subdistrict Approach b)Mayo Clinic Update c)2016 BIO International Conference C.Marketing: Update………………………………………………………………………..130 D.Prototyping Event (September 15-17, 2016)………………………………………….131 E.Metrics……………………………………………………………………………………..132 (Presenter: Craig Helmstetter, Wilder Foundation) XI.DMCC 2016 Budget: Year to Date Update………………………………………………………………………….142 XII.Meeting Schedule: A.Next Regular Meeting: October 27, 2016 at 9:30 A.M. XIII.Adjournment 850548.DOCX 1 1 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTES June 23, 2016 I.Call to Order. Chair Tina Smith called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. at the Mayo Civic Center, Exhibit Hall, located at 30 Civic Center Drive SE, Rochester, MN 55904. II.Roll Call. In attendance were Chair Tina Smith, Council Member Mark Hickey, Jim Campbell, R.T. Rybak, Commissioner Jim Bier, Mayor Ardell Brede and Michael Dougherty. Ill. Approval of Agenda. Chair Smith requested a motion to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Bier moved approval. Mr. Rybak seconded. Ayes (7), Nays (0), Motion carried. IV.Approval of Minutes. Chair Smith requested approval of the Minutes from the meeting held on May 26, 2016. Mr. Campbell moved approval. Council Member Hickey seconded. Ayes (7), Nays (0), Motion carried. V.Public Comment Period. Chair Smith invited members of the community to provide comments. No public comments were offered. VI.Chair’s Report. Chair Smith stated that the Board looked forward to the upcoming joint meeting with the City of Rochester Common Council and the EDA Board of Directors. Chair Smith noted that the EDA is due to present a proposed budget to the DMCC by August 1. Following its review and approval, the DMCC is scheduled to present its budget to the City of Rochester by September 1. Chair Smith suggested that the Board request an extension to October 1 from the City of Rochester. Chair Smith also noted that an informal ad-hoc review of materials would be helpful and asked Board members to indicate their interest to participate. Commissioner Bier, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Dougherty, and Council Member Hickey volunteered to participate. VII.DMCC 2015 Audit. Craig Popenhagen and Joe Duda of CliftonLarsonAllen (“CLA”) presented the results of the 2015 DMCC audit. Mr. Popenhagen stated that CLA issued a clean opinion on financial statements, and had no findings on internal controls or legal compliance. Mr. Popehagen noted that the IRS Form 990 must be prepared for filing and will be presented at an upcoming meeting. Commissioner Bier moved approval of the audit. Mr. Rybak seconded. Ayes (7), Nays (0), Motion carried. VIII.City of Rochester. A.Update. Randy Staver, Rochester City Council President, provided the City of Rochester update. The City currently leads efforts with the University of Minnesota Metropolitan Design Center (MDC) to create DMC district design guidelines. The design guidelines incorporate elements of the Rochester Downtown Master Plan, the DMC Development Plan, and the City’s urban design standards. Combining these resources will create a single source of reference for developers and designers. Public engagement and input will occur in the near future, with adoption of the standards occurring this year. 2 2 The City Council has engaged with Grounded Solution Network to evaluate the City’s housing efforts, including inclusionary housing policies. President Staver also noted that City staff have suggested that an interim parking management strategy, which evaluates parking needs in terms of use and not strictly zoning requirements, be adopted in the downtown area. This strategy will be developed using recommendations from SRF, Rochester Public Works and Transportation Departments, Mayo Clinic, and the EDA. B.WMBE Update. President Staver reported on the City’s ongoing efforts related to Women and Minority Business Enterprise (“WMBE”). Under the DMC legislation, the City must ensure public infrastructure projects meet WMBE standards. The City reviewed its goals and policies on June 23 and continues to meet with experts and governmental resources on this matter. Current City policy will be augmented with an implementation plan and should be completed in the next 90 days. The City established 4% WMBE contractor goal for the Mayo Civic Center, and expansion of the Rochester Recreation and Senior Center, which has resulted in more than $5 million in City-issued WMBE contracts. President Staver also noted that the City is participating in a regional supplier diversity event with Mayo Clinic and the Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce and gathering information to assist WMBE firms in registering for the Minnesota cooperative purchasing system. IX.Project Update. A.Design Guidelines: Update. Rochester-Olmsted Planning Director Mitzi Baker, University of Minnesota Metropolitan Design Center (MDC) Senior Research Fellow John Carmody, and Patrick Seeb, EDA Director of Economic Development and Placemaking provided an update on the DMC design guidelines. MDC consolidated multiple documents into one set of design guidelines. Ms. Baker noted that design guidelines convey expectations for development design. Mr. Seeb stated that the EDA has been working with the City throughout this process, noting that the guidelines will serve as an important tool for setting community expectations for development. Mr. Carmody stated that the guidelines intend to further four goals: a thriving economy, sustainability, a healthy city, and a vibrant public realm. Mr. Rybak noted that navigation through three pedestrian levels can be difficult and questioned how the guidelines address this. Mr. Carmody stated that all levels should be as visible and accessible as possible. Mr. Rybak said that new building skyways ought to move people to streets, and subways ought to allow in natural light. Mayor Brede noted the unique opportunity to coordinate all three levels presented by the design guideline redesign. After questioning from the Board regarding the ownership of and access to skyways, Ms. Baker stated that the skyway system is a hybrid of some other common models, with private owners/developers agreeing with the City on use and hours of operation. X.Economic Development Agency. A.EDA Update. EDA Executive Director Lisa Clarke provided the EDA update. With respect to Heart of the City, Ms. Clarke stated that six teams were invited to submit to the Heart of the City Public Space Design request for proposals, and all six teams participated in the proposers’ meeting. Mayor Brede stated that national and international firms continue to be engaged in the design process. Ms. Clarke noted that the EDA continues to work cooperatively with the City on the ongoing transit studies. 3 3  The metric dashboard development with Wilder Foundation is ongoing. Wilder’s current work focuses on populating the historical data from 2012 - present. Mr. Campbell requested that the EDA provide a draft before the next Board meeting. Ms. Clarke gave an update on the Placemakers Rochester Prototyping festival. She stated that twenty-two interested groups have submitted proposals, with topics including safety, road use, water use, entertainment, and more. Approximately twelve of the proposals will be chosen for the festival, which will occur during Mayo Clinic’s Transform conference in September 2016. Ms. Clarke reported that in the Saint Marys Place subdistrict, stakeholders met to discuss use of public space. The Metropolitan Design Center has been involved in this planning as well. The stakeholder group will develop a proposed plan, which will be brought to the DMCC Board for review and could be a template for other subdistricts. Ms. Clarke stated that the EDA continues to explore models that will maximize the benefit of the two year, $150,000 Midwest Climate and Energy grant from the McKnight Foundation. Mayor Brede noted that the McKnight Foundation has provided the City with two energy fellows, and Ms. Clarke suggested the fellows get involved in the DMC energy and sustainability efforts. Ms. Clarke provided an update on the enclosed EDA’s 2016 workplan, stating that the EDA is on track to complete the priorities for the year. For 2017, a workplan and budget will again be developed. Finally, Ms. Clarke noted that June’s positive press continues to generate interest in the DMC initiative. B. Discovery Square: Update. Jeff Bolton, EDA Board President and Mayo Clinic Chief Administrative Officer, Dr. Clark Otley, EDA Board Vice President and Mayo Clinic Ventures and Business Development Medical Director, and Mayo Clinic DMC Manager, Jamie Rothe, joined Ms. Clarke to provide an update on activity in the Discovery Square subdistrict. Mr. Bolton noted that Mayo Clinic was a recent recipient of a $142 million grant from the National Institutes of Health for an exclusive, national precision medicine initiative research-cohort biobank. Mr. Bolton stated that this award indicates Mayo Clinic’s unmatched leadership in the precision medicine field, while also noting that Mayo Clinic has invested significantly in the efforts to become a leader in individualized and precision medicine. Mr. Bolton said Mayo Clinic already serves as an international health and wellness destination, with a unique ability to bring together multidisciplinary teams for the treatment of serious and complex illnesses. Discovery Square will allow Mayo Clinic and its partners to move from medical discovery to practice even more quickly. Mr. Bolton stated that Mayo Clinic has partnered with a real estate development company to develop an RFP process and received nine proposals from prequalified developers. The quality of the proposals indicates the market interest in Destination Medical Center. Mayo Clinic real estate could provide up to two million square feet of development in Discovery Square. The first building could be 100,000 square feet in size, with Mayo Clinic occupying about half of the space. Construction is slated to begin in late 2017 and will be a catalyst for further development. Dr. Otley commented on the 2016 BIO International Conference (“BIO”), at which Mayo Clinic made its Discovery Square announcement. In addition to EDA and Mayo Clinic representatives, Rochester City Council Member Nick Campion and Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce President Rob Miller also participated in the conference. BIO is the foremost biotechnology conference in the world, and news of Mayo Clinic’s investment was a local, statewide, and national story. Mayo Clinic is dedicated to 4 4  creating the international destination for health, wellness, and research. Mayo Clinic is actively engaged in discussions with potential Discovery Square tenants. Dr. Otley noted that Discovery Square reinforces the Mayo Clinic model of care. The EDA will leverage the physical development of Discovery Square to create the cultural environment necessary for Discovery Square to flourish. Commissioner Bier encouraged Mayo Clinic to think big and aim for a large initial presence. Ms. Rothe noted that there were 800 speakers at BIO and that the DMC strategy was built with Nelsen Biomedical, a Minneapolis-based firm. Additional BIO participants included Mayo Clinic Ventures, Medical Alley, the University of Minnesota, and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. XI. DMCC 2016 Budget: Year to Date Update. Commissioner Jim Bier noted 88% percent of budgeted funds remain unspent with 58% of the year remaining. Commissioner Bier noted that funding for the Chateau Theatre and City transit were previously authorized and that those funds are not shown in the monthly DMCC financial statements. The DMCC is working to develop a process to demonstrate the flow of that funding on an ongoing basis. XII. Meeting Schedule. The next regular meeting of the DMCC is Thursday, August 25, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. XIII. Adjournment. Chair Smith adjourned the meeting.           850088.DOCX 5 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP 109 North Main Street, PO Box 217 Austin, MN 55912-0217 507-434-7000 | fax 507-437-8997 CLAconnect.com    IRS Form 990 o Informational filing – financial information reconciles to DMCC’s audited financial statements o Best practice – draft Form 990 provided to board members before filing o Part III – statement of DMCC’s organizational purpose o Part IV – listing of board members o Part VI – governance of DMCC o Schedule B – schedule of contributors o Schedule O – additional information o Schedule R – related organizations o No unrelated business income for 2015 o Filing deadline November 15, 2016  Minnesota Annual Report – filing deadline November 15, 2016  Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation Annual Registration o Valid through December 31, 2016 o Renew on-line each year  Next steps – signing and filing of the IRS Form 990 and Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation Annual Registration  Questions? 6 DRA F T 52634004-01-15 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP P.O. BOX 217 AUSTIN, MN 55912 DALE MARTINSON DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 201 4TH STREET SE, NO. 204 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 !559047! 7 DRA F T Caution: Forms printed from within Adobe Acrobat products may not meet IRS or state taxing agency specifications. When using Acrobat 9.x products and later products, select "None"in the "Page Scaling" selection box in the Adobe "Print" dialog. CLIENT'S COPY 8 DRA F T TINA FLINT SMITH DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 201 4TH STREET SE NO. 204 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 TINA FLINT SMITH: ENCLOSED IS THE ORGANIZATION'S 2015 EXEMPT ORGANIZATION RETURN. THE STATE EXEMPT ORGANIZATION ANNUAL REPORT IS ALSO ENCLOSED. THESE SHOULD BE SIGNED, DATED, AND MAILED, AS INDICATED. SPECIFIC FILING INSTRUCTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS. FORM 990 RETURN: THIS RETURN HAS QUALIFIED FOR ELECTRONIC FILING. AFTER YOU HAVE REVIEWED THE RETURN FOR COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN FORM 8879-EO TO OUR OFFICE. WE WILL TRANSMIT THE RETURN ELECTRONICALLY TO THE IRS AND NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED. RETURN FORM 8879-EO TO US BY NOVEMBER 15, 2016. MINNESOTA ANNUAL REPORT: THE MINNESOTA ANNUAL REPORT SHOULD BE MAILED ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 15, 2016 TO: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SUITE 1200, BREMER TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MN 55101-2130 ENCLOSE A CHECK OR MONEY ORDER FOR $25.00, PAYABLE TO STATE OF MINNESOTA. INCLUDE THE ORGANIZATION'S FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND "2015 ANNUAL REPORT" ON THE REMITTANCE. THE REPORT SHOULD BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUAL(S). MINNESOTA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REGISTRATION (ONLINE REGISTRATION REQUIRED); AS PART OF THE TAX RETURN PREPARATION SERVICES THAT CLA 9 DRA F T PROVIDES TO YOU, WE HAVE CHECKED YOUR BUSINESS STANDING WITH THE MN SECRETARY OF STATE. ACCORDING TO THE MN SOS WEBSITE, YOUR BUSINESS IS IN GOOD STANDING THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016. HOWEVER, THE ANNUAL RENEWAL WILL NEED TO BE FILED TO MAINTAIN YOUR GOOD STANDING FOR 2017. YOU CAN FILE THE RENEWAL ONLINE AT THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S WEBSITE - HTTPS://MBLSPORTAL.SOS.STATE.MN.US/BUSINESS/SEARCH. PLEASE FILE THIS RENEWAL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ENSURE A CONTINUED STATUS OF GOOD STANDING. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE; UNDER RULES EFFECTIVE JUNE 8, 1999, ORGANIZATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THEIR ANNUAL RETURNS (FORM 990) FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS AND THEIR EXEMPTION APPLICATION (FORM 1023 OR 1024) TO ANYONE WHO REQUESTS THEM. YOU MUST PROVIDE THE ENTIRE FORM 990 AND SCHEDULE A, IF APPLICABLE, EXCEPT FOR THOSE PAGES NOT NORMALLY OPEN TO PUBLIC INSPECTION (I.E., DONOR NAMES AND ADDRESSES). AN ORGANIZATION CAN AVOID HAVING TO PROVIDE COPIES IF IT POSTS THESE DOCUMENTS ON A WORLD WIDE WEB PAGE (MAINTAINED BY ITSELF OR ANOTHER ENTITY WHERE SIMILAR DOCUMENTS ARE POSTED) AND TELLS ANYONE REQUESTING COPIES HOW TO LOCATE THE DOCUMENTS. YOU SHOULD CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SPECIFICS OF COMPLYING WITH THE NEW RULES, OR ON POSTING YOUR FORMS ON THE INTERNET. COPIES OF ALL THE RETURNS ARE ENCLOSED FOR YOUR FILES. WE SUGGEST THAT YOU RETAIN THESE COPIES INDEFINITELY. SINCERELY, CRAIG POPENHAGEN 10 DRA F T 50094104-01-15 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FOR THE YEAR ENDING Prepared for Prepared by Amount due or refund Make check payable to Mail tax return and check (if applicable) to Return must be mailed on or before Special Instructions TAX RETURN FILING INSTRUCTIONS FORM 990 DECEMBER 31, 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 201 4TH STREET SE NO. 204 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP P.O. BOX 217 AUSTIN, MN 55912 507-434-7000 NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE THIS RETURN HAS QUALIFIED FOR ELECTRONIC FILING. AFTER YOU HAVE REVIEWED THE RETURN FOR COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN FORM 8879-EO TO OUR OFFICE. WE WILL TRANSMIT THE RETURN ELECTRONICALLY TO THE IRS AND NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED. RETURN FORM 8879-EO TO US BY NOVEMBER 15, 2016. 11 DRA F T OMB No. 1545-1878 Form For calendar year 2015, or fiscal year beginning , 2015, and ending ,20 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 52305110-19-15 Employer identification number Enter five numbers, butdo not enter all zerosERO firm name do not enter all zeros | Do not send to the IRS. Keep for your records. | Information about Form 8879-EO and its instructions is at 1a, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, 5b, Do not 1a 2a 3a 4a 5a | b Total revenue, 1b 2b 3b 4b 5b | b Total revenue, |b Total tax | b Tax based on investment income | b Balance Due (a) (b) (c) Officer's PIN: check one box only ERO's EFIN/PIN. Pub. 4163, For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see instructions. e-file Name of exempt organization Name and title of officer ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Officer's signature |Date | ERO's signature |Date | Form (2015) (Whole Dollars Only) Check the box for the return for which you are using this Form 8879-EO and enter the applicable amount, if any, from the return. If you check the box on line or below, and the amount on that line for the return being filed with this form was blank, then leave line or whichever is applicable, blank (do not enter -0-). But, if you entered -0- on the return, then enter -0- on the applicable line below. complete more than 1 line in Part I. Form 990 check here Form 990-EZ check here Form 1120-POL check here if any (Form 990, Part VIII, column (A), line 12)~~~~~~~ if any (Form 990-EZ, line 9) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (Form 1120-POL, line 22) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Form 990-PF check here Form 8868 check here (Form 990-PF, Part VI, line 5) (Form 8868, Part I, line 3c or Part II, line 8c) Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I am an officer of the above organization and that I have examined a copy of the organization's 2015 electronic return and accompanying schedules and statements and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete. I further declare that the amount in Part I above is the amount shown on the copy of the organization's electronic return. I consent to allow my intermediate service provider, transmitter, or electronic return originator (ERO) to send the organization's return to the IRS and to receive from the IRS an acknowledgement of receipt or reason for rejection of the transmission, the reason for any delay in processing the return or refund, and the date of any refund. If applicable, I authorize the U.S. Treasury and its designated Financial Agent to initiate an electronic funds withdrawal (direct debit) entry to the financial institution account indicated in the tax preparation software for payment of the organization's federal taxes owed on this return, and the financial institution to debit the entry to this account. To revoke a payment, I must contact the U.S. Treasury Financial Agent at 1-888-353-4537 no later than 2 business days prior to the payment (settlement) date. I also authorize the financial institutions involved in the processing of the electronic payment of taxes to receive confidential information necessary to answer inquiries and resolve issues related to the payment. I have selected a personal identification number (PIN) as my signature for the organization's electronic return and, if applicable, the organization's consent to electronic funds withdrawal. I authorize to enter my PIN as my signature on the organization's tax year 2015 electronically filed return. If I have indicated within this return that a copy of the return is being filed with a state agency(ies) regulating charities as part of the IRS Fed/State program, I also authorize the aforementioned ERO to enter my PIN on the return's disclosure consent screen. As an officer of the organization, I will enter my PIN as my signature on the organization's tax year 2015 electronically filed return. If I have indicated within this return that a copy of the return is being filed with a state agency(ies) regulating charities as part of the IRS Fed/State program, I will enter my PIN on the return's disclosure consent screen. Enter your six-digit electronic filing identification number (EFIN) followed by your five-digit self-selected PIN. I certify that the above numeric entry is my PIN, which is my signature on the 2015 electronically filed return for the organization indicated above. I confirm that I am submitting this return in accordance with the requirements of Modernized e-File (MeF) Information for Authorized IRS Providers for Business Returns. LHA www.irs.gov/form8879eo. Part I Type of Return and Return Information Part II Declaration and Signature Authorization of Officer Part III Certification and Authentication ERO Must Retain This Form - See Instructions Do Not Submit This Form To the IRS Unless Requested To Do So 8879-EO IRS e-file Signature Authorizationfor an Exempt Organization8879-EO 2015 ***** THIS IS NOT A FILEABLE COPY ***** DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 JAMES V BIER TREASURER X 3,605,188. X CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 82924 ***** THIS IS NOT A FILEABLE COPY *** 41312913129 08/16/16 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G112 DRA F T Check if self-employed OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Check ifapplicable: Addresschange Namechange Initialreturn Finalreturn/termin-ated Gross receipts $ Amendedreturn Applica-tionpending Are all subordinates included? 532001 12-16-15 Beginning of Current Year Paid Preparer Use Only Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public.Open to Public Inspection| Information about Form 990 and its instructions is at A For the 2015 calendar year, or tax year beginning and ending B C D Employer identification number E G H(a) H(b) H(c) F Yes No Yes No I J K Website: | L M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 4 5 6 7a 7b a bAc t i v i t i e s & G o v e r n a n c e Prior Year Current Year 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Re v e n u e a b Ex p e n s e s End of Year 20 21 22 Sign Here Yes No For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite )501(c)(3) 501(c) ((insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 |Corporation Trust Association OtherForm of organization:Year of formation:State of legal domicile: | | Ne t A s s e t s o r Fu n d B a l a n c e s Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. Declaration of preparer (other than officer) is based on all information of which preparer has any knowledge. Signature of officer Date Type or print name and title Date PTINPrint/Type preparer's name Preparer's signature Firm's name Firm's EIN Firm's address Phone no. Form Name of organization Doing business as Number and street Telephone number City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code Is this a group return for subordinates?Name and address of principal officer:~~ If "No," attach a list. (see instructions) Group exemption number | Tax-exempt status: Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: Check this box if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets. Number of voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1a) Number of independent voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1b) Total number of individuals employed in calendar year 2015 (Part V, line 2a) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Total number of volunteers (estimate if necessary) Total unrelated business revenue from Part VIII, column (C), line 12 Net unrelated business taxable income from Form 990-T, line 34 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••••••••••• Contributions and grants (Part VIII, line 1h) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Program service revenue (Part VIII, line 2g) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Investment income (Part VIII, column (A), lines 3, 4, and 7d) Other revenue (Part VIII, column (A), lines 5, 6d, 8c, 9c, 10c, and 11e) ~~~~~~~~ Total revenue - add lines 8 through 11 (must equal Part VIII, column (A), line 12) ••• Grants and similar amounts paid (Part IX, column (A), lines 1-3) Benefits paid to or for members (Part IX, column (A), line 4) Salaries, other compensation, employee benefits (Part IX, column (A), lines 5-10) ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ Professional fundraising fees (Part IX, column (A), line 11e) Total fundraising expenses (Part IX, column (D), line 25) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Other expenses (Part IX, column (A), lines 11a-11d, 11f-24e) Total expenses. Add lines 13-17 (must equal Part IX, column (A), line 25) Revenue less expenses. Subtract line 18 from line 12 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••••• Total assets (Part X, line 16) Total liabilities (Part X, line 26) Net assets or fund balances. Subtract line 21 from line 20 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••• May the IRS discuss this return with the preparer shown above? (see instructions) ••••••••••••••••••••• LHA Form (2015) www.irs.gov/form990. Part I Summary Signature BlockPart II 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax990 2015 § == 999 EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 15, 2016 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 201 4TH STREET SE 204 507-328-2850 3,605,188. ROCHESTER, MN 55904 JAMES V. BIER X SAME AS C ABOVE X WWW.DMC.MN X 2013 MN PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN ROCHESTER, 8 8 0 8 0. 0. 5,416,446. 3,605,187. 0.0. 1.1. 0.0. 5,416,447. 3,605,188. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0.0. 0. 5,416,447. 3,605,188. 5,416,447. 3,605,188. 0.0. 1,292,478. 250,340. 1,292,478. 250,340. 0.0. JAMES V. BIER, TREASURER CRAIG POPENHAGEN CRAIG POPENHAGEN 08/16/16 P01587689 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP 41-0746749 P.O. BOX 217 AUSTIN, MN 55912 507-434-7000 X SEE SCHEDULE O FOR ORGANIZATION MISSION STATEMENT CONTINUATION 13 DRA F T Code:Expenses $including grants of $Revenue $ Code:Expenses $including grants of $Revenue $ Code:Expenses $including grants of $Revenue $ Expenses $including grants of $Revenue $ 53200212-16-15 1 2 3 4 Yes No Yes No 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part III •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Briefly describe the organization's mission: Did the organization undertake any significant program services during the year which were not listed on the prior Form 990 or 990-EZ? If "Yes," describe these new services on Schedule O. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization cease conducting, or make significant changes in how it conducts, any program services? If "Yes," describe these changes on Schedule O. ~~~~~~ Describe the organization's program service accomplishments for each of its three largest program services, as measured by expenses. Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations are required to report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total expenses, and revenue, if any, for each program service reported. () () () () () () () () () Other program services (Describe in Schedule O.) () () Total program service expenses | Form (2015) 2 Statement of Program Service AccomplishmentsPart III 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X WITH MAYO CLINIC AT ITS HEART, THE DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER (DMC) INITIATIVE WILL BE THE CATALYST TO POSITION ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA AS THE WORLD'S PREMIER DESTINATION CENTER FOR HEALTH AND WELLNESS; ATTRACTING PEOPLE, INVESTMENT, AND JOBS TO AMERICA'S CITY FOR HEALTH X X 3,223,338. OVERSIGHT, PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - AN IN DEPTH STUDY OF INFRASTRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES, AND FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROCHESTER AS A DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER. 3,223,338. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 2 14 DRA F T 53200312-16-15 Yes No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Section 501(c)(3) organizations. a b c d e f a b 11a 11b 11c 11d 11e 11f 12a 12b 13 14a 14b 15 16 17 18 19 a b If "Yes," complete Schedule A Schedule B, Schedule of Contributors If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part II If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part III If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part II If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part III If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part IV If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part V If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part VI If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part VII If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part VIII If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part IX If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part X If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part X If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Parts XI and XII If "Yes," and if the organization answered "No" to line 12a, then completing Schedule D, Parts XI and XII is optional If "Yes," complete Schedule E If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts I and IV If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts II and IV If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts III and IV If "Yes," complete Schedule G, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule G, Part II If "Yes," complete Schedule G, Part III Form 990 (2015)Page Is the organization described in section 501(c)(3) or 4947(a)(1) (other than a private foundation)? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Is the organization required to complete ? Did the organization engage in direct or indirect political campaign activities on behalf of or in opposition to candidates for public office? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization engage in lobbying activities, or have a section 501(h) election in effect during the tax year? Is the organization a section 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5), or 501(c)(6) organization that receives membership dues, assessments, or similar amounts as defined in Revenue Procedure 98-19? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization maintain any donor advised funds or any similar funds or accounts for which donors have the right to provide advice on the distribution or investment of amounts in such funds or accounts? Did the organization receive or hold a conservation easement, including easements to preserve open space, the environment, historic land areas, or historic structures? Did the organization maintain collections of works of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report an amount in Part X, line 21, for escrow or custodial account liability, serve as a custodian for amounts not listed in Part X; or provide credit counseling, debt management, credit repair, or debt negotiation services? Did the organization, directly or through a related organization, hold assets in temporarily restricted endowments, permanent endowments, or quasi-endowments? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If the organization's answer to any of the following questions is "Yes," then complete Schedule D, Parts VI, VII, VIII, IX, or X as applicable. Did the organization report an amount for land, buildings, and equipment in Part X, line 10? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report an amount for investments - other securities in Part X, line 12 that is 5% or more of its total assets reported in Part X, line 16? Did the organization report an amount for investments - program related in Part X, line 13 that is 5% or more of its total assets reported in Part X, line 16? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report an amount for other assets in Part X, line 15 that is 5% or more of its total assets reported in Part X, line 16? Did the organization report an amount for other liabilities in Part X, line 25? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Did the organization's separate or consolidated financial statements for the tax year include a footnote that addresses the organization's liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN 48 (ASC 740)? Did the organization obtain separate, independent audited financial statements for the tax year? ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Was the organization included in consolidated, independent audited financial statements for the tax year? ~~~~~ Is the organization a school described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii)? Did the organization maintain an office, employees, or agents outside of the United States? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization have aggregate revenues or expenses of more than $10,000 from grantmaking, fundraising, business, investment, and program service activities outside the United States, or aggregate foreign investments valued at $100,000 or more? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more than $5,000 of grants or other assistance to or for any foreign organization? Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more than $5,000 of aggregate grants or other assistance to or for foreign individuals? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report a total of more than $15,000 of expenses for professional fundraising services on Part IX, column (A), lines 6 and 11e? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report more than $15,000 total of fundraising event gross income and contributions on Part VIII, lines 1c and 8a? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report more than $15,000 of gross income from gaming activities on Part VIII, line 9a? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Form (2015) 3 Part IV Checklist of Required Schedules 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 3 15 DRA F T 53200412-16-15 Yes No 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 a b 20a 20b 21 22 23 24a 24b 24c 24d 25a 25b 26 27 28a 28b 28c 29 30 31 32 33 34 35a 35b 36 37 38 a b c d a b Section 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4), and 501(c)(29) organizations. a b c a b Section 501(c)(3) organizations. Note. (continued) If "Yes," complete Schedule H If "Yes," complete Schedule I, Parts I and II If "Yes," complete Schedule I, Parts I and III If "Yes," complete Schedule J If "Yes," answer lines 24b through 24d and complete Schedule K. If "No", go to line 25a If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part II If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part III If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part IV If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part IV If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part IV If "Yes," complete Schedule M If "Yes," complete Schedule M If "Yes," complete Schedule N, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule N, Part II If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part I If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part II, III, or IV, and Part V, line 1 If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part V, line 2 If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part V, line 2 If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part VI Form 990 (2015)Page Did the organization operate one or more hospital facilities? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes" to line 20a, did the organization attach a copy of its audited financial statements to this return? ~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report more than $5,000 of grants or other assistance to any domestic organization or domestic government on Part IX, column (A), line 1? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report more than $5,000 of grants or other assistance to or for domestic individuals on Part IX, column (A), line 2? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization answer "Yes" to Part VII, Section A, line 3, 4, or 5 about compensation of the organization's current and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and highest compensated employees? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization have a tax-exempt bond issue with an outstanding principal amount of more than $100,000 as of the last day of the year, that was issued after December 31, 2002? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization invest any proceeds of tax-exempt bonds beyond a temporary period exception? Did the organization maintain an escrow account other than a refunding escrow at any time during the year to defease any tax-exempt bonds? Did the organization act as an "on behalf of" issuer for bonds outstanding at any time during the year? ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization engage in an excess benefit transaction with a disqualified person during the year? Is the organization aware that it engaged in an excess benefit transaction with a disqualified person in a prior year, and that the transaction has not been reported on any of the organization's prior Forms 990 or 990-EZ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization report any amount on Part X, line 5, 6, or 22 for receivables from or payables to any current or former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, highest compensated employees, or disqualified persons? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization provide a grant or other assistance to an officer, director, trustee, key employee, substantial contributor or employee thereof, a grant selection committee member, or to a 35% controlled entity or family member of any of these persons? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Was the organization a party to a business transaction with one of the following parties (see Schedule L, Part IV instructions for applicable filing thresholds, conditions, and exceptions): A current or former officer, director, trustee, or key employee? ~~~~~~~~~~~ A family member of a current or former officer, director, trustee, or key employee? An entity of which a current or former officer, director, trustee, or key employee (or a family member thereof) was an officer, director, trustee, or direct or indirect owner? ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization receive more than $25,000 in non-cash contributions? Did the organization receive contributions of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets, or qualified conservation contributions? ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization liquidate, terminate, or dissolve and cease operations? Did the organization sell, exchange, dispose of, or transfer more than 25% of its net assets? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization own 100% of an entity disregarded as separate from the organization under Regulations sections 301.7701-2 and 301.7701-3? Was the organization related to any tax-exempt or taxable entity? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization have a controlled entity within the meaning of section 512(b)(13)? If "Yes" to line 35a, did the organization receive any payment from or engage in any transaction with a controlled entity within the meaning of section 512(b)(13)? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization make any transfers to an exempt non-charitable related organization? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization conduct more than 5% of its activities through an entity that is not a related organization and that is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes? ~~~~~~~~ Did the organization complete Schedule O and provide explanations in Schedule O for Part VI, lines 11b and 19? All Form 990 filers are required to complete Schedule O ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Form (2015) 4 Part IV Checklist of Required Schedules 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 4 16 DRA F T 53200512-16-15 Yes No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a b c 1a 1b 1c a b 2a Note. 2b 3a 3b 4a 5a 5b 5c 6a 6b 7a 7b 7c 7e 7f 7g 7h 8 9a 9b a b a b a b c a b Organizations that may receive deductible contributions under section 170(c). a b c d e f g h 7d 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Sponsoring organizations maintaining donor advised funds. Sponsoring organizations maintaining donor advised funds. a b Section 501(c)(7) organizations. a b 10a 10b Section 501(c)(12) organizations. a b 11a 11b a b Section 4947(a)(1) non-exempt charitable trusts. 12a 12b Section 501(c)(29) qualified nonprofit health insurance issuers. Note. a b c a b 13a 13b 13c 14a 14b e-file If "No," to line 3b, provide an explanation in Schedule O If "No," provide an explanation in Schedule O Did the organization receive a payment in excess of $75 made partly as a contribution and partly for goods and services provided to the payor? Form (2015) Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part V ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Enter the number reported in Box 3 of Form 1096. Enter -0- if not applicable ~~~~~~~~~~~ Enter the number of Forms W-2G included in line 1a. Enter -0- if not applicable ~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization comply with backup withholding rules for reportable payments to vendors and reportable gaming (gambling) winnings to prize winners?••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Enter the number of employees reported on Form W-3, Transmittal of Wage and Tax Statements, filed for the calendar year ending with or within the year covered by this return~~~~~~~~~~ If at least one is reported on line 2a, did the organization file all required federal employment tax returns? If the sum of lines 1a and 2a is greater than 250, you may be required to (see instructions) ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization have unrelated business gross income of $1,000 or more during the year? If "Yes," has it filed a Form 990-T for this year? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ At any time during the calendar year, did the organization have an interest in, or a signature or other authority over, a financial account in a foreign country (such as a bank account, securities account, or other financial account)?~~~~~~~ If "Yes," enter the name of the foreign country: See instructions for filing requirements for FinCEN Form 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR). Was the organization a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction at any time during the tax year? Did any taxable party notify the organization that it was or is a party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction? ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes," to line 5a or 5b, did the organization file Form 8886-T? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Does the organization have annual gross receipts that are normally greater than $100,000, and did the organization solicit any contributions that were not tax deductible as charitable contributions? If "Yes," did the organization include with every solicitation an express statement that such contributions or gifts were not tax deductible? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes," did the organization notify the donor of the value of the goods or services provided? Did the organization sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of tangible personal property for which it was required to file Form 8282? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• If "Yes," indicate the number of Forms 8282 filed during the year Did the organization receive any funds, directly or indirectly, to pay premiums on a personal benefit contract? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~Did the organization, during the year, pay premiums, directly or indirectly, on a personal benefit contract? If the organization received a contribution of qualified intellectual property, did the organization file Form 8899 as required? If the organization received a contribution of cars, boats, airplanes, or other vehicles, did the organization file a Form 1098-C? ~ Did a donor advised fund maintained by the sponsoring organization have excess business holdings at any time during the year? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the sponsoring organization make any taxable distributions under section 4966? Did the sponsoring organization make a distribution to a donor, donor advisor, or related person? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Enter: Initiation fees and capital contributions included on Part VIII, line 12 Gross receipts, included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 12, for public use of club facilities ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Enter: Gross income from members or shareholders Gross income from other sources (Do not net amounts due or paid to other sources against amounts due or received from them.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Is the organization filing Form 990 in lieu of Form 1041? If "Yes," enter the amount of tax-exempt interest received or accrued during the year •••••• Is the organization licensed to issue qualified health plans in more than one state? See the instructions for additional information the organization must report on Schedule O. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Enter the amount of reserves the organization is required to maintain by the states in which the organization is licensed to issue qualified health plans Enter the amount of reserves on hand ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization receive any payments for indoor tanning services during the tax year? If "Yes," has it filed a Form 720 to report these payments? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••• 5 Part V Statements Regarding Other IRS Filings and Tax Compliance 990 J DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 3 0 0 X X X X X X X X X X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 5 17 DRA F T 532006 12-16-15 Yes No 1a 1b 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b 2 3 4 5 6 7a 7b 8a 8b 9 a b a b Yes No 10 11 a b 10a 10b 11a 12a 12b 12c 13 14 15a 15b 16a 16b a b 12a b c 13 14 15 a b 16a b 17 18 19 20 For each "Yes" response to lines 2 through 7b below, and for a "No" response to line 8a, 8b, or 10b below, describe the circumstances, processes, or changes in Schedule O. See instructions. If "Yes," provide the names and addresses in Schedule O (This Section B requests information about policies not required by the Internal Revenue Code.) If "No," go to line 13 If "Yes," describe in Schedule O how this was done (explain in Schedule O) If there are material differences in voting rights among members of the governing body, or if the governing body delegated broad authority to an executive committee or similar committee, explain in Schedule O. Did the organization contemporaneously document the meetings held or written actions undertaken during the year by the following: Were officers, directors, or trustees, and key employees required to disclose annually interests that could give rise to conflicts? Form (2015) Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part VI ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Enter the number of voting members of the governing body at the end of the tax year Enter the number of voting members included in line 1a, above, who are independent ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Did any officer, director, trustee, or key employee have a family relationship or a business relationship with any other officer, director, trustee, or key employee? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization delegate control over management duties customarily performed by or under the direct supervision of officers, directors, or trustees, or key employees to a management company or other person?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization make any significant changes to its governing documents since the prior Form 990 was filed? Did the organization become aware during the year of a significant diversion of the organization's assets? Did the organization have members or stockholders? ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization have members, stockholders, or other persons who had the power to elect or appoint one or more members of the governing body? Are any governance decisions of the organization reserved to (or subject to approval by) members, stockholders, or persons other than the governing body? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The governing body? Each committee with authority to act on behalf of the governing body? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Is there any officer, director, trustee, or key employee listed in Part VII, Section A, who cannot be reached at the organization's mailing address? ••••••••••••••••• Did the organization have local chapters, branches, or affiliates? If "Yes," did the organization have written policies and procedures governing the activities of such chapters, affiliates, and branches to ensure their operations are consistent with the organization's exempt purposes? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Has the organization provided a complete copy of this Form 990 to all members of its governing body before filing the form? Describe in Schedule O the process, if any, used by the organization to review this Form 990. Did the organization have a written conflict of interest policy? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Did the organization regularly and consistently monitor and enforce compliance with the policy? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization have a written whistleblower policy? Did the organization have a written document retention and destruction policy? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the process for determining compensation of the following persons include a review and approval by independent persons, comparability data, and contemporaneous substantiation of the deliberation and decision? The organization's CEO, Executive Director, or top management official Other officers or key employees of the organization If "Yes" to line 15a or 15b, describe the process in Schedule O (see instructions). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization invest in, contribute assets to, or participate in a joint venture or similar arrangement with a taxable entity during the year? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes," did the organization follow a written policy or procedure requiring the organization to evaluate its participation in joint venture arrangements under applicable federal tax law, and take steps to safeguard the organization's exempt status with respect to such arrangements?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• List the states with which a copy of this Form 990 is required to be filed Section 6104 requires an organization to make its Forms 1023 (or 1024 if applicable), 990, and 990-T (Section 501(c)(3)s only) available for public inspection. Indicate how you made these available. Check all that apply. Own website Another's website Upon request Other Describe in Schedule O whether (and if so, how) the organization made its governing documents, conflict of interest policy, and financial statements available to the public during the tax year. State the name, address, and telephone number of the person who possesses the organization's books and records: | 6 Part VI Governance, Management, and Disclosure Section A. Governing Body and Management Section B. Policies Section C. Disclosure 990 J DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X 8 8 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X MN X DALE MARTINSON - 507-328-2850 201 4TH STREET SE ROOM 204, ROCHESTER, MN 55904 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 6 18 DRA F T In d i v i d u a l t r u s t e e o r d i r e c t o r In s t i t u t i o n a l t r u s t e e Of f i c e r Ke y e m p l o y e e Hi g h e s t c o m p e n s a t e d em p l o y e e Fo r m e r (do not check more than one box, unless person is both an officer and a director/trustee) 532007 12-16-15 current Section A. Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key Employees, and Highest Compensated Employees 1a current current former former directors or trustees (A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part VII ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Complete this table for all persons required to be listed. Report compensation for the calendar year ending with or within the organization's tax year. ¥ List all of the organization's officers, directors, trustees (whether individuals or organizations), regardless of amount of compensation.Enter -0- in columns (D), (E), and (F) if no compensation was paid.¥ List all of the organization's key employees, if any. See instructions for definition of "key employee." ¥ List the organization's five highest compensated employees (other than an officer, director, trustee, or key employee) who received report- able compensation (Box 5 of Form W-2 and/or Box 7 of Form 1099-MISC) of more than $100,000 from the organization and any related organizations. ¥ List all of the organization's officers, key employees, and highest compensated employees who received more than $100,000 of reportable compensation from the organization and any related organizations. ¥ List all of the organization's that received, in the capacity as a former director or trustee of the organization, more than $10,000 of reportable compensation from the organization and any related organizations. List persons in the following order: individual trustees or directors; institutional trustees; officers; key employees; highest compensated employees; and former such persons. Check this box if neither the organization nor any related organization compensated any current officer, director, or trustee. PositionName and Title Average hours per week (list any hours for related organizations below line) Reportable compensation from the organization (W-2/1099-MISC) Reportable compensation from related organizations (W-2/1099-MISC) Estimated amount of other compensation from the organization and related organizations Form (2015) 7 Part VII Compensation of Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key Employees, Highest Compensated Employees, and Independent Contractors 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X (1) TINA FLINT SMITH 6.00 CHAIR X X 0.0.0. (2) R.T. RYBAK 4.00 VICE CHAIR X X 0.0.0. (3) JIM BIER 4.00 TREASURER X X 0.0.0. (4) ARDELL F. BREDE 4.00 DIRECTOR X 0.0.0. (5) JAMES CAMPBELL 4.00 DIRECTOR X 0.0.0. (6) BILL GEORGE 4.00 DIRECTOR X 0.0.0. (7) ED HRUSKA 4.00 DIRECTOR X 0.0.0. (8) SUSAN PARK RANI 4.00 DIRECTOR X 0.0.0. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 7 19 DRA F T Fo r m e r In d i v i d u a l t r u s t e e o r d i r e c t o r In s t i t u t i o n a l t r u s t e e Of f i c e r Hi g h e s t c o m p e n s a t e d em p l o y e e Ke y e m p l o y e e (do not check more than one box, unless person is both an officer and a director/trustee) 53200812-16-15 Section A. Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key Employees, and Highest Compensated Employees (B)(C)(A)(D)(E)(F) 1b c d Sub-total Total from continuation sheets to Part VII, Section A Total (add lines 1b and 1c) 2 Yes No 3 4 5 former 3 4 5 Section B. Independent Contractors 1 (A)(B)(C) 2 (continued) If "Yes," complete Schedule J for such individual If "Yes," complete Schedule J for such individual If "Yes," complete Schedule J for such person Page Form 990 (2015) PositionAverage hours per week (list any hours for related organizations below line) Name and title Reportable compensation from the organization (W-2/1099-MISC) Reportable compensation from related organizations (W-2/1099-MISC) Estimated amount of other compensation from the organization and related organizations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ~~~~~~~~~~ | •••••••••••••••••••••••• | Total number of individuals (including but not limited to those listed above) who received more than $100,000 of reportable compensation from the organization | Did the organization list any officer, director, or trustee, key employee, or highest compensated employee on line 1a? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For any individual listed on line 1a, is the sum of reportable compensation and other compensation from the organization and related organizations greater than $150,000? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did any person listed on line 1a receive or accrue compensation from any unrelated organization or individual for services rendered to the organization? •••••••••••••••••••••••• Complete this table for your five highest compensated independent contractors that received more than $100,000 of compensation from the organization. Report compensation for the calendar year ending with or within the organization's tax year. Name and business address Description of services Compensation Total number of independent contractors (including but not limited to those listed above) who received more than $100,000 of compensation from the organization | Form (2015) 8 Part VII 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 0.0.0. 0.0.0. 0.0.0. 0 X X X DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOP 200 1ST STREET SW, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARATION 3,468,069. MCGRANN SHEA CARNIVAL STRAUGHN & LAMB, CHTD 800 NICOLLET MALL, SUITE 2600, MINNEAPOLIS,LEGAL SERVICES 324,144. 2 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 8 20 DRA F T Noncash contributions included in lines 1a-1f: $ 532009 12-16-15 Total revenue. (A)(B)(C)(D) 1 a b c d e f g h 1 1 1 1 1 1 a b c d e f Co n t r i b u t i o n s , G i f t s , G r a n t s an d O t h e r S i m i l a r A m o u n t s Total. Business Code a b c d e f g 2 Pr o g r a m S e r v i c e Re v e n u e Total. 3 4 5 6 a b c d a b c d 7 a b c 8 a b 9 a b c a b 10 a b c a b Business Code 11 a b c d e Total. Ot h e r R e v e n u e 12 Revenue excludedfrom tax undersections512 - 514 All other contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts not included above See instructions. Form (2015) Page Form 990 (2015) Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part VIII ••••••••••••••••••••••••• Total revenue Related orexempt functionrevenue Unrelatedbusinessrevenue Federated campaigns Membership dues ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Fundraising events Related organizations ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Government grants (contributions) ~~ Add lines 1a-1f ••••••••••••••••• | All other program service revenue ~~~~~ Add lines 2a-2f ••••••••••••••••• | Investment income (including dividends, interest, and other similar amounts) Income from investment of tax-exempt bond proceeds ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | Royalties ••••••••••••••••••••••• | (i) Real (ii) Personal Gross rents Less: rental expenses Rental income or (loss) Net rental income or (loss) ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~ •••••••••••••• | Gross amount from sales of assets other than inventory (i) Securities (ii) Other Less: cost or other basis and sales expenses Gain or (loss) ~~~ ~~~~~~~ Net gain or (loss) ••••••••••••••••••• | Gross income from fundraising events (not including $of contributions reported on line 1c). See Part IV, line 18 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Less: direct expenses~~~~~~~~~~ Net income or (loss) from fundraising events ••••• | Gross income from gaming activities. See Part IV, line 19 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Less: direct expenses Net income or (loss) from gaming activities ~~~~~~~~~ •••••• | Gross sales of inventory, less returns and allowances ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Less: cost of goods sold Net income or (loss) from sales of inventory ~~~~~~~~ •••••• | Miscellaneous Revenue All other revenue ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines 11a-11d ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |••••••••••••• 9 Part VIII Statement of Revenue 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 3,602,319. 2,868. 3,605,187. 1.1. 3,605,188.0.0.1. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 9 21 DRA F T Check here if following SOP 98-2 (ASC 958-720) 532010 12-16-15 Total functional expenses. Joint costs. (A)(B)(C)(D) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 a b c d e f g 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 a b c d e 25 26 Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations must complete all columns. All other organizations must complete column (A). Grants and other assistance to domestic organizations and domestic governments. See Part IV, line 21 Compensation not included above, to disqualified persons (as defined under section 4958(f)(1)) and persons described in section 4958(c)(3)(B) Pension plan accruals and contributions (include section 401(k) and 403(b) employer contributions) Professional fundraising services. See Part IV, line 17 (If line 11g amount exceeds 10% of line 25, column (A) amount, list line 11g expenses on Sch O.) Other expenses. Itemize expenses not covered above. (List miscellaneous expenses in line 24e. If line24e amount exceeds 10% of line 25, column (A)amount, list line 24e expenses on Schedule O.) Add lines 1 through 24e Complete this line only if the organization reported in column (B) joint costs from a combined educational campaign and fundraising solicitation. Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part IX •••••••••••••••••••••••••• Total expenses Program serviceexpenses Management andgeneral expenses Fundraisingexpenses ~ Grants and other assistance to domestic individuals. See Part IV, line 22 ~~~~~~~ Grants and other assistance to foreign organizations, foreign governments, and foreign individuals. See Part IV, lines 15 and 16 ~~~ Benefits paid to or for members~~~~~~~ Compensation of current officers, directors, trustees, and key employees ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ Other salaries and wages ~~~~~~~~~~ Other employee benefits ~~~~~~~~~~ Payroll taxes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fees for services (non-employees): Management Legal Accounting Lobbying ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Investment management fees Other. ~~~~~~~~ Advertising and promotion Office expenses Information technology Royalties ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Occupancy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Travel Payments of travel or entertainment expenses for any federal, state, or local public officials Conferences, conventions, and meetings ~~ Interest Payments to affiliates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Depreciation, depletion, and amortization Insurance ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ All other expenses | Form (2015) Do not include amounts reported on lines 6b, 7b, 8b, 9b, and 10b of Part VIII. 10 Part IX Statement of Functional Expenses 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 324,144.324,144. 3,983.3,983. 13,914.13,914. 21,232.21,232. 976.976. 17,601.17,601. PROGRAM COSTS 3,223,338. 3,223,338. 3,605,188. 3,223,338. 381,850.0. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 10 22 DRA F T 53201112-16-15 (A)(B) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10c 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 a b 10a 10b As s e t s Total assets. Li a b i l i t i e s Total liabilities. Organizations that follow SFAS 117 (ASC 958), check here and complete lines 27 through 29, and lines 33 and 34. 27 28 29 Organizations that do not follow SFAS 117 (ASC 958), check here and complete lines 30 through 34. 30 31 32 33 34 Ne t A s s e t s o r F u n d B a l a n c e s Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part X ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Beginning of year End of year Cash - non-interest-bearing Savings and temporary cash investments Pledges and grants receivable, net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Accounts receivable, net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Loans and other receivables from current and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and highest compensated employees. Complete Part II of Schedule L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Loans and other receivables from other disqualified persons (as defined under section 4958(f)(1)), persons described in section 4958(c)(3)(B), and contributing employers and sponsoring organizations of section 501(c)(9) voluntary employees' beneficiary organizations (see instr). Complete Part II of Sch L ~~ Notes and loans receivable, net Inventories for sale or use Prepaid expenses and deferred charges ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Land, buildings, and equipment: cost or other basis. Complete Part VI of Schedule D Less: accumulated depreciation ~~~ ~~~~~~ Investments - publicly traded securities Investments - other securities. See Part IV, line 11 Investments - program-related. See Part IV, line 11 Intangible assets ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Other assets. See Part IV, line 11 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines 1 through 15 (must equal line 34) •••••••••• Accounts payable and accrued expenses Grants payable Deferred revenue ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tax-exempt bond liabilities Escrow or custodial account liability. Complete Part IV of Schedule D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ Loans and other payables to current and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, highest compensated employees, and disqualified persons. Complete Part II of Schedule L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Secured mortgages and notes payable to unrelated third parties ~~~~~~ Unsecured notes and loans payable to unrelated third parties ~~~~~~~~ Other liabilities (including federal income tax, payables to related third parties, and other liabilities not included on lines 17-24). Complete Part X of Schedule D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines 17 through 25 •••••••••••••••••• | Unrestricted net assets Temporarily restricted net assets Permanently restricted net assets ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Capital stock or trust principal, or current funds Paid-in or capital surplus, or land, building, or equipment fund Retained earnings, endowment, accumulated income, or other funds ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ Total net assets or fund balances ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Total liabilities and net assets/fund balances •••••••••••••••• Form (2015) 11 Balance SheetPart X 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 2,740.1,000. 2,868. 14,138.12,620. 1,275,600.233,852. 1,292,478.250,340. 1,265,340.186,720. 24,138.12,620. 3,000.51,000. 1,292,478.250,340. X 0.0. 0.0. 1,292,478.250,340. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 11 23 DRA F T 53201212-16-15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Yes No 1 2 3 a b c 2a 2b 2c a b 3a 3b Form 990 (2015)Page Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part XI ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Total revenue (must equal Part VIII, column (A), line 12) Total expenses (must equal Part IX, column (A), line 25) Revenue less expenses. Subtract line 2 from line 1 Net assets or fund balances at beginning of year (must equal Part X, line 33, column (A)) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments Donated services and use of facilities Investment expenses Prior period adjustments ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Other changes in net assets or fund balances (explain in Schedule O) Net assets or fund balances at end of year. Combine lines 3 through 9 (must equal Part X, line 33, column (B)) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in this Part XII ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Accounting method used to prepare the Form 990: Cash Accrual Other If the organization changed its method of accounting from a prior year or checked "Other," explain in Schedule O. Were the organization's financial statements compiled or reviewed by an independent accountant? ~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes," check a box below to indicate whether the financial statements for the year were compiled or reviewed on a separate basis, consolidated basis, or both: Separate basis Consolidated basis Both consolidated and separate basis Were the organization's financial statements audited by an independent accountant? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes," check a box below to indicate whether the financial statements for the year were audited on a separate basis, consolidated basis, or both: Separate basis Consolidated basis Both consolidated and separate basis If "Yes" to line 2a or 2b, does the organization have a committee that assumes responsibility for oversight of the audit, review, or compilation of its financial statements and selection of an independent accountant?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If the organization changed either its oversight process or selection process during the tax year, explain in Schedule O. As a result of a federal award, was the organization required to undergo an audit or audits as set forth in the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-133? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes," did the organization undergo the required audit or audits? If the organization did not undergo the required audit or audits, explain why in Schedule O and describe any steps taken to undergo such audits •••••••••••••••• Form (2015) 12 Part XI Reconciliation of Net Assets Part XII Financial Statements and Reporting 990 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 3,605,188. 3,605,188. 0. 0. 0. 0. X X X X X X X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 12 24 DRA F T OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 532021 09-23-15 Information about Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at (i)(iii)(iv) (v)(vi)(ii) Name of supported organization Type of organization (described on lines 1-9 above (see instructions)) Is the organizationlisted in yourgoverning document? Amount of monetary support (see instructions) Amount of other support (see instructions) EIN (Form 990 or 990-EZ)Complete if the organization is a section 501(c)(3) organization or a section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust. | Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ. | Open to Public Inspection Name of the organization Employer identification number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 section 170(b)(1)(A)(i). section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii). section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii). section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii). section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv). section 170(b)(1)(A)(v). section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). section 509(a)(2). section 509(a)(4). section 509(a)(1) section 509(a)(2) section 509(a)(3). a b c d e f g Type I. You must complete Part IV, Sections A and B. Type II. You must complete Part IV, Sections A and C. Type III functionally integrated. You must complete Part IV, Sections A, D, and E. Type III non-functionally integrated. You must complete Part IV, Sections A and D, and Part V. Yes No Total For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990 or 990-EZ. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 (All organizations must complete this part.) See instructions. The organization is not a private foundation because it is: (For lines 1 through 11, check only one box.) A church, convention of churches, or association of churches described in A school described in (Attach Schedule E (Form 990 or 990-EZ).) A hospital or a cooperative hospital service organization described in A medical research organization operated in conjunction with a hospital described in Enter the hospital's name, city, and state: An organization operated for the benefit of a college or university owned or operated by a governmental unit described in (Complete Part II.) A federal, state, or local government or governmental unit described in An organization that normally receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or from the general public described in (Complete Part II.) A community trust described in (Complete Part II.) An organization that normally receives: (1) more than 33 1/3% of its support from contributions, membership fees, and gross receipts from activities related to its exempt functions - subject to certain exceptions, and (2) no more than 33 1/3% of its support from gross investment income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 tax) from businesses acquired by the organization after June 30, 1975. See (Complete Part III.) An organization organized and operated exclusively to test for public safety. See An organization organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of one or more publicly supported organizations described in or . See Check the box in lines 11a through 11d that describes the type of supporting organization and complete lines 11e, 11f, and 11g. A supporting organization operated, supervised, or controlled by its supported organization(s), typically by giving the supported organization(s) the power to regularly appoint or elect a majority of the directors or trustees of the supporting organization. A supporting organization supervised or controlled in connection with its supported organization(s), by having control or management of the supporting organization vested in the same persons that control or manage the supported organization(s). A supporting organization operated in connection with, and functionally integrated with, its supported organization(s) (see instructions). A supporting organization operated in connection with its supported organization(s) that is not functionally integrated. The organization generally must satisfy a distribution requirement and an attentiveness requirement (see instructions). Check this box if the organization received a written determination from the IRS that it is a Type I, Type II, Type III functionally integrated, or Type III non-functionally integrated supporting organization. Enter the number of supported organizations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Provide the following information about the supported organization(s). LHA www.irs.gov/form990. SCHEDULE A Part I Reason for Public Charity Status Public Charity Status and Public Support 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 13 25 DRA F T Subtract line 5 from line 4. 53202209-23-15 Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | 2 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 1 2 3 4 5 Total. 6 Public support. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total support. 12 First five years. stop here 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 a b a b 33 1/3% support test - 2015. stop here. 33 1/3% support test - 2014. stop here. 10% -facts-and-circumstances test - 2015. stop here. 10% -facts-and-circumstances test - 2014. stop here. Private foundation. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 | Add lines 7 through 10 Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page (Complete only if you checked the box on line 5, 7, or 8 of Part I or if the organization failed to qualify under Part III. If the organization fails to qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part III.) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.")~~ Tax revenues levied for the organ- ization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf ~~~~ The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge ~ Add lines 1 through 3 ~~~ The portion of total contributions by each person (other than a governmental unit or publicly supported organization) included on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the amount shown on line 11, column (f)~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Amounts from line 4 ~~~~~~~ Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources ~ Net income from unrelated business activities, whether or not the business is regularly carried on ~ Other income. Do not include gain or loss from the sale of capital assets (Explain in Part VI.) ~~~~ Gross receipts from related activities, etc. (see instructions) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a section 501(c)(3) organization, check this box and •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••| ~~~~~~~~~~~~Public support percentage for 2015 (line 6, column (f) divided by line 11, column (f)) Public support percentage from 2014 Schedule A, Part II, line 14 % %~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If the organization did not check the box on line 13, and line 14 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box and The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | If the organization did not check a box on line 13 or 16a, and line 15 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box and The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, or 16b, and line 14 is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test, check this box and Explain in Part VI how the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, or 17a, and line 15 is 10% or more, and if the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test, check this box and Explain in Part VI how the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test. The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization ~~~~~~~~ | If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, 17a, or 17b, check this box and see instructions ••• | Part II Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Sections 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) Section A. Public Support Section B. Total Support Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 5,416,446. 3,605,187. 9,021,633. 5,416,446. 3,605,187. 9,021,633. 9,021,633. 5,416,446. 3,605,187. 9,021,633. 1.1.2. 9,021,635. X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 14 26 DRA F T (Subtract line 7c from line 6.) Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received from other than disqualified persons that exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the amount on line 13 for the year (Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.) 532023 09-23-15 Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) | Total support. 3 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total. a b c 8 Public support. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 9 10a b c 11 12 13 14 First five years. stop here 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 2015 2014 17 18 a b 33 1/3% support tests - 2015. stop here. 33 1/3% support tests - 2014. stop here. Private foundation. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Unrelated business taxable income (less section 511 taxes) from businesses acquired after June 30, 1975 Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page (Complete only if you checked the box on line 9 of Part I or if the organization failed to qualify under Part II. If the organization fails to qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part II.) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Gifts, grants, contributions, and membership fees received. (Do not include any "unusual grants.")~~ Gross receipts from admissions, merchandise sold or services per- formed, or facilities furnished in any activity that is related to the organization's tax-exempt purpose Gross receipts from activities that are not an unrelated trade or bus- iness under section 513 ~~~~~ Tax revenues levied for the organ- ization's benefit and either paid to or expended on its behalf ~~~~ The value of services or facilities furnished by a governmental unit to the organization without charge ~ ~~~ Add lines 1 through 5 Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and 3 received from disqualified persons ~~~~~~ Add lines 7a and 7b ~~~~~~~ 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Amounts from line 6 ~~~~~~~ Gross income from interest, dividends, payments received on securities loans, rents, royalties and income from similar sources ~ ~~~~ Add lines 10a and 10b ~~~~~~ Net income from unrelated businessactivities not included in line 10b, whether or not the business is regularly carried on ~~~~~~~ Other income. Do not include gainor loss from the sale of capitalassets (Explain in Part VI.)~~~~ If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third, fourth, or fifth tax year as a section 501(c)(3) organization, check this box and ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••| Public support percentage for 2015 (line 8, column (f) divided by line 13, column (f)) Public support percentage from 2014 Schedule A, Part III, line 15 ~~~~~~~~~~~~% %•••••••••••••••••••• Investment income percentage for (line 10c, column (f) divided by line 13, column (f)) Investment income percentage from Schedule A, Part III, line 17 ~~~~~~~~% %~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If the organization did not check the box on line 14, and line 15 is more than 33 1/3%, and line 17 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization ~~~~~~~~~~ | If the organization did not check a box on line 14 or line 19a, and line 16 is more than 33 1/3%, and line 18 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization~~~~ | If the organization did not check a box on line 14, 19a, or 19b, check this box and see instructions •••••••• | Part III Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Section 509(a)(2) Section A. Public Support Section B. Total Support Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage Section D. Computation of Investment Income Percentage DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 15 27 DRA F T 532024 09-23-15 4 Yes No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3a 3b 3c 4a 4b 4c 5a 5b 5c 6 7 8 9a 9b 9c 10a 10b a b c a b c a b c a b c a b Type I or Type II only. Substitutions only. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 If "No" describe in how the supported organizations are designated. If designated by class or purpose, describe the designation. If historic and continuing relationship, explain. If "Yes," explain in how the organization determined that the supported organization was described in section 509(a)(1) or (2). If "Yes," answer (b) and (c) below. If "Yes," describe in when and how the organization made the determination. If "Yes," explain in what controls the organization put in place to ensure such use. If "Yes," and if you checked 11a or 11b in Part I, answer (b) and (c) below. If "Yes," describe in how the organization had such control and discretion despite being controlled or supervised by or in connection with its supported organizations. If "Yes," explain in what controls the organization used to ensure that all support to the foreign supported organization was used exclusively for section 170(c)(2)(B) purposes. If "Yes," answer (b) and (c) below (if applicable). Also, provide detail in including (i) the names and EIN numbers of the supported organizations added, substituted, or removed; (ii) the reasons for each such action; (iii) the authority under the organization's organizing document authorizing such action; and (iv) how the action was accomplished (such as by amendment to the organizing document). If "Yes," provide detail in If "Yes," complete Part I of Schedule L (Form 990 or 990-EZ). If "Yes," complete Part I of Schedule L (Form 990 or 990-EZ). If "Yes," provide detail in If "Yes," provide detail in If "Yes," provide detail in If "Yes," answer 10b below. (Use Schedule C, Form 4720, to determine whether the organization had excess business holdings.) Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page (Complete only if you checked a box in line 11 on Part I. If you checked 11a of Part I, complete Sections A and B. If you checked 11b of Part I, complete Sections A and C. If you checked 11c of Part I, complete Sections A, D, and E. If you checked 11d of Part I, complete Sections A and D, and complete Part V.) Are all of the organization's supported organizations listed by name in the organization's governing documents? Did the organization have any supported organization that does not have an IRS determination of status under section 509(a)(1) or (2)? Did the organization have a supported organization described in section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6)? Did the organization confirm that each supported organization qualified under section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6) and satisfied the public support tests under section 509(a)(2)? Did the organization ensure that all support to such organizations was used exclusively for section 170(c)(2)(B) purposes? Was any supported organization not organized in the United States ("foreign supported organization")? Did the organization have ultimate control and discretion in deciding whether to make grants to the foreign supported organization? Did the organization support any foreign supported organization that does not have an IRS determination under sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(1) or (2)? Did the organization add, substitute, or remove any supported organizations during the tax year? Was any added or substituted supported organization part of a class already designated in the organization's organizing document? Was the substitution the result of an event beyond the organization's control? Did the organization provide support (whether in the form of grants or the provision of services or facilities) to anyone other than (i) its supported organizations, (ii) individuals that are part of the charitable class benefited by one or more of its supported organizations, or (iii) other supporting organizations that also support or benefit one or more of the filing organization's supported organizations? Did the organization provide a grant, loan, compensation, or other similar payment to a substantial contributor (defined in section 4958(c)(3)(C)), a family member of a substantial contributor, or a 35% controlled entity with regard to a substantial contributor? Did the organization make a loan to a disqualified person (as defined in section 4958) not described in line 7? Was the organization controlled directly or indirectly at any time during the tax year by one or more disqualified persons as defined in section 4946 (other than foundation managers and organizations described in section 509(a)(1) or (2))? Did one or more disqualified persons (as defined in line 9a) hold a controlling interest in any entity in which the supporting organization had an interest? Did a disqualified person (as defined in line 9a) have an ownership interest in, or derive any personal benefit from, assets in which the supporting organization also had an interest? Was the organization subject to the excess business holdings rules of section 4943 because of section 4943(f) (regarding certain Type II supporting organizations, and all Type III non-functionally integrated supporting organizations)? Did the organization have any excess business holdings in the tax year? Part VI Part VI Part VI Part VI Part VI Part VI Part VI, Part VI. Part VI. Part VI. Part VI. Part IV Supporting Organizations Section A. All Supporting Organizations DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 16 28 DRA F T 532025 09-23-15 5 Yes No 11 a b c 11a 11b 11c Yes No 1 2 1 2 Yes No 1 1 Yes No 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 a b c Yes No a b a b 2a 2b 3a 3b Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 If "Yes" to a, b, or c, provide detail in If "No," describe in how the supported organization(s) effectively operated, supervised, or controlled the organization's activities. If the organization had more than one supported organization, describe how the powers to appoint and/or remove directors or trustees were allocated among the supported organizations and what conditions or restrictions, if any, applied to such powers during the tax year. If "Yes," explain in how providing such benefit carried out the purposes of the supported organization(s) that operated, supervised, or controlled the supporting organization. If "No," describe in how control or management of the supporting organization was vested in the same persons that controlled or managed the supported organization(s). If "No," explain in how the organization maintained a close and continuous working relationship with the supported organization(s). If "Yes," describe in the role the organization's supported organizations played in this regard. Check the box next to the method that the organization used to satisfy the Integral Part Test during the year Complete below. Complete below. Describe in Part VI how you supported a government entity (see instructions). If "Yes," then in how these activities directly furthered their exempt purposes, how the organization was responsive to those supported organizations, and how the organization determined that these activities constituted substantially all of its activities. If "Yes," explain in the reasons for the organization's position that its supported organization(s) would have engaged in these activities but for the organization's involvement. the role played by the organization in this regard. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page Has the organization accepted a gift or contribution from any of the following persons? A person who directly or indirectly controls, either alone or together with persons described in (b) and (c) below, the governing body of a supported organization? A family member of a person described in (a) above? A 35% controlled entity of a person described in (a) or (b) above? Did the directors, trustees, or membership of one or more supported organizations have the power to regularly appoint or elect at least a majority of the organization's directors or trustees at all times during the tax year? Did the organization operate for the benefit of any supported organization other than the supported organization(s) that operated, supervised, or controlled the supporting organization? Were a majority of the organization's directors or trustees during the tax year also a majority of the directors or trustees of each of the organization's supported organization(s)? Did the organization provide to each of its supported organizations, by the last day of the fifth month of the organization's tax year, (i) a written notice describing the type and amount of support provided during the prior tax year, (ii) a copy of the Form 990 that was most recently filed as of the date of notification, and (iii) copies of the organization's governing documents in effect on the date of notification, to the extent not previously provided? Were any of the organization's officers, directors, or trustees either (i) appointed or elected by the supported organization(s) or (ii) serving on the governing body of a supported organization? By reason of the relationship described in (2), did the organization's supported organizations have a significant voice in the organization's investment policies and in directing the use of the organization's income or assets at all times during the tax year? The organization satisfied the Activities Test. The organization is the parent of each of its supported organizations. The organization supported a governmental entity. Activities Test. Did substantially all of the organization's activities during the tax year directly further the exempt purposes of the supported organization(s) to which the organization was responsive? Did the activities described in (a) constitute activities that, but for the organization's involvement, one or more of the organization's supported organization(s) would have been engaged in? Parent of Supported Organizations. Did the organization have the power to regularly appoint or elect a majority of the officers, directors, or trustees of each of the supported organizations? Provide details in Did the organization exercise a substantial degree of direction over the policies, programs, and activities of each of its supported organizations? If "Yes," describe in Part VI. Part VI Part VI Part VI Part VI Part VI (see instructions): line 2 line 3 Answer (a) and (b) below. Part VI identify those supported organizations and explain Part VI Answer (a) and (b) below. Part VI. Part VI (continued)Part IV Supporting Organizations Section B. Type I Supporting Organizations Section C. Type II Supporting Organizations Section D. All Type III Supporting Organizations Section E. Type III Functionally-Integrated Supporting Organizations DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 17 29 DRA F T 53202609-23-15 6 1 See instructions. Section A - Adjusted Net Income 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Adjusted Net Income Section B - Minimum Asset Amount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a b c d e 1a 1b 1c 1d 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total Discount Part VI Minimum Asset Amount Section C - Distributable Amount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 Distributable Amount. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page Check here if the organization satisfied the Integral Part Test as a qualifying trust on Nov. 20, 1970. All other Type III non-functionally integrated supporting organizations must complete Sections A through E. (B) Current Year (optional)(A) Prior Year Net short-term capital gain Recoveries of prior-year distributions Other gross income (see instructions) Add lines 1 through 3 Depreciation and depletion Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for production of income (see instructions) Other expenses (see instructions) (subtract lines 5, 6 and 7 from line 4) (B) Current Year (optional)(A) Prior Year Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year): Average monthly value of securities Average monthly cash balances Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c) claimed for blockage or other factors (explain in detail in ): Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt-use assets Subtract line 2 from line 1d Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for greater amount, see instructions). Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3) Multiply line 5 by .035 Recoveries of prior-year distributions (add line 7 to line 6) Current Year Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8, Column A) Enter 85% of line 1 Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8, Column A) Enter greater of line 2 or line 3 Income tax imposed in prior year Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to emergency temporary reduction (see instructions) Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a non-functionally-integrated Type III supporting organization (see instructions). Part V Type III Non-Functionally Integrated 509(a)(3) Supporting Organizations DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 18 30 DRA F T 53202709-23-15 7 Section D - Distributions Current Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Part VI Total annual distributions. Part VI (i) Excess Distributions (ii) Underdistributions Pre-2015 (iii) Distributable Amount for 2015Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a b c d e f g h i j Total a b c Excess distributions carryover to 2016. a b c d e Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt purposes Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt purposes of supported organizations, in excess of income from activity Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of supported organizations Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required) Other distributions (describe in ). See instructions. Add lines 1 through 6. Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the organization is responsive (provide details in ). See instructions. Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 Line 8 amount divided by Line 9 amount Distributable amount for 2015 from Section C, line 6 Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2015 (reasonable cause required-see instructions) Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2015: From 2013 From 2014 of lines 3a through e Applied to underdistributions of prior years Applied to 2015 distributable amount Carryover from 2010 not applied (see instructions) Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f. Distributions for 2015 from Section D, line 7:$ Applied to underdistributions of prior years Applied to 2015 distributable amount Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4. Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2015, if any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions). Remaining underdistributions for 2015. Subtract lines 3h and 4b from line 1 (if amount greater than zero, see instructions). Add lines 3j and 4c. Breakdown of line 7: Excess from 2013 Excess from 2014 Excess from 2015 (continued) Part V Type III Non-Functionally Integrated 509(a)(3) Supporting Organizations DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 19 31 DRA F T 532028 09-23-15 8 Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2015 Page Provide the explanations required by Part II, line 10; Part II, line 17a or 17b; Part III, line 12; Part IV, Section A, lines 1, 2, 3b, 3c, 4b, 4c, 5a, 6, 9a, 9b, 9c, 11a, 11b, and 11c; Part IV, Section B, lines 1 and 2; Part IV, Section C, line 1; Part IV, Section D, lines 2 and 3; Part IV, Section E, lines 1c, 2a, 2b, 3a and 3b; Part V, line 1; Part V, Section B, line 1e; Part V, Section D, lines 5, 6, and 8; and Part V, Section E, lines 2, 5, and 6. Also complete this part for any additional information. (See instructions.) Part VI Supplemental Information. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 20 32 DRA F T OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 52345110-26-15 Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015) (Form 990, 990-EZ,or 990-PF)| Attach to Form 990, Form 990-EZ, or Form 990-PF. | Information about Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) and its instructions is at . Name of the organization Employer identification number Organization type Filers of:Section: not General Rule Special Rule. Note. General Rule Special Rules (1) (2) General Rule Caution. must For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF. exclusively exclusively exclusively nonexclusively (check one): Form 990 or 990-EZ 501(c)( ) (enter number) organization 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust treated as a private foundation 527 political organization Form 990-PF 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust treated as a private foundation 501(c)(3) taxable private foundation Check if your organization is covered by the or a Only a section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10) organization can check boxes for both the General Rule and a Special Rule. See instructions. For an organization filing Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF that received, during the year, contributions totaling $5,000 or more (in money or property) from any one contributor. Complete Parts I and II. See instructions for determining a contributor's total contributions. For an organization described in section 501(c)(3) filing Form 990 or 990-EZ that met the 33 1/3% support test of the regulations under sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), that checked Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ), Part II, line 13, 16a, or 16b, and that received from any one contributor, during the year, total contributions of the greater of $5,000 or 2% of the amount on (i) Form 990, Part VIII, line 1h, or (ii) Form 990-EZ, line 1. Complete Parts I and II. For an organization described in section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10) filing Form 990 or 990-EZ that received from any one contributor, during the year, total contributions of more than $1,000 for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals. Complete Parts I, II, and III. For an organization described in section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10) filing Form 990 or 990-EZ that received from any one contributor, during the year, contributions for religious, charitable, etc., purposes, but no such contributions totaled more than $1,000. If this box is checked, enter here the total contributions that were received during the year for an religious, charitable, etc., purpose. Do not complete any of the parts unless the applies to this organization because it received religious, charitable, etc., contributions totaling $5,000 or more during the year ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | $ An organization that is not covered by the General Rule and/or the Special Rules does not file Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF), but it answer "No" on Part IV, line 2, of its Form 990; or check the box on line H of its Form 990-EZ or on its Form 990-PF, Part I, line 2, to certify that it does not meet the filing requirements of Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF). LHA www.irs.gov/form990 Schedule B Schedule of Contributors 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X 3 X 33 DRA F T 523452 10-26-15 Name of organization Employer identification number Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015) (a) No. (b) Name, address, and ZIP + 4 (c) Total contributions (d) Type of contribution Person Payroll Noncash (a) No. (b) Name, address, and ZIP + 4 (c) Total contributions (d) Type of contribution Person Payroll Noncash (a) No. (b) Name, address, and ZIP + 4 (c) Total contributions (d) Type of contribution Person Payroll Noncash (a) No. (b) Name, address, and ZIP + 4 (c) Total contributions (d) Type of contribution Person Payroll Noncash (a) No. (b) Name, address, and ZIP + 4 (c) Total contributions (d) Type of contribution Person Payroll Noncash (a) No. (b) Name, address, and ZIP + 4 (c) Total contributions (d) Type of contribution Person Payroll Noncash Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015)Page (see instructions). Use duplicate copies of Part I if additional space is needed. $ (Complete Part II for noncash contributions.) $ (Complete Part II for noncash contributions.) $ (Complete Part II for noncash contributions.) $ (Complete Part II for noncash contributions.) $ (Complete Part II for noncash contributions.) $ (Complete Part II for noncash contributions.) 2 Part I Contributors DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 1 CITY OF ROCHESTER X 201 4TH STREET SE 3,602,319. ROCHESTER, MN 55904 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 22 34 DRA F T 523453 10-26-15 Name of organization Employer identification number Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015) (a) No. from Part I (c) FMV (or estimate) (see instructions) (b) Description of noncash property given (d) Date received (a) No. from Part I (c) FMV (or estimate) (see instructions) (b) Description of noncash property given (d) Date received (a) No. from Part I (c) FMV (or estimate) (see instructions) (b) Description of noncash property given (d) Date received (a) No. from Part I (c) FMV (or estimate) (see instructions) (b) Description of noncash property given (d) Date received (a) No. from Part I (c) FMV (or estimate) (see instructions) (b) Description of noncash property given (d) Date received (a) No. from Part I (c) FMV (or estimate) (see instructions) (b) Description of noncash property given (d) Date received Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015)Page (see instructions). Use duplicate copies of Part II if additional space is needed. $ $ $ $ $ $ 3 Part II Noncash Property DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 23 35 DRA F T (Enter this info. once.) For organizations completing Part III, enter the total of exclusively religious, charitable, etc., contributions of $1,000 or less for the year. 523454 10-26-15 Name of organization Employer identification number religious, charitable, etc., contributions to organizations described in section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10) that total more than $1,000 forthe year from any one contributor. (a) (e) and Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015) (a) No.fromPart I (b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is held (e) Transfer of gift Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of transferor to transferee (a) No.fromPart I (b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is held (e) Transfer of gift Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of transferor to transferee (a) No.fromPart I (b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is held (e) Transfer of gift Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of transferor to transferee (a) No.fromPart I (b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is held (e) Transfer of gift Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of transferor to transferee Complete columns through the following line entry. Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2015)Page | $ Use duplicate copies of Part III if additional space is needed. Exclusively 4 Part III DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 24 36 DRA F T OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 53205111-02-15 Held at the End of the Tax Year (Form 990)| Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990,Part IV, line 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, 11e, 11f, 12a, or 12b.| Attach to Form 990.| Information about Schedule D (Form 990) and its instructions is at Open to PublicInspection Name of the organization Employer identification number (a) (b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Yes No Yes No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d 2a 2b 2c 2d Yes No Yes No 1 2 a b (i) (ii) a b For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990.Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 6. Donor advised funds Funds and other accounts Total number at end of year Aggregate value of contributions to (during year) Aggregate value of grants from (during year) Aggregate value at end of year ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization inform all donors and donor advisors in writing that the assets held in donor advised funds are the organization's property, subject to the organization's exclusive legal control?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization inform all grantees, donors, and donor advisors in writing that grant funds can be used only for charitable purposes and not for the benefit of the donor or donor advisor, or for any other purpose conferring impermissible private benefit?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 7. Purpose(s) of conservation easements held by the organization (check all that apply). Preservation of land for public use (e.g., recreation or education) Protection of natural habitat Preservation of open space Preservation of a historically important land area Preservation of a certified historic structure Complete lines 2a through 2d if the organization held a qualified conservation contribution in the form of a conservation easement on the last day of the tax year. Total number of conservation easements Total acreage restricted by conservation easements ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Number of conservation easements on a certified historic structure included in (a) Number of conservation easements included in (c) acquired after 8/17/06, and not on a historic structure listed in the National Register ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Number of conservation easements modified, transferred, released, extinguished, or terminated by the organization during the tax year | Number of states where property subject to conservation easement is located | Does the organization have a written policy regarding the periodic monitoring, inspection, handling of violations, and enforcement of the conservation easements it holds? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Staff and volunteer hours devoted to monitoring, inspecting, handling of violations, and enforcing conservation easements during the year | Amount of expenses incurred in monitoring, inspecting, handling of violations, and enforcing conservation easements during the year | $ Does each conservation easement reported on line 2(d) above satisfy the requirements of section 170(h)(4)(B)(i) and section 170(h)(4)(B)(ii)? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In Part XIII, describe how the organization reports conservation easements in its revenue and expense statement, and balance sheet, and include, if applicable, the text of the footnote to the organization's financial statements that describes the organization's accounting for conservation easements. Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 8. If the organization elected, as permitted under SFAS 116 (ASC 958), not to report in its revenue statement and balance sheet works of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets held for public exhibition, education, or research in furtherance of public service, provide, in Part XIII, the text of the footnote to its financial statements that describes these items. If the organization elected, as permitted under SFAS 116 (ASC 958), to report in its revenue statement and balance sheet works of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets held for public exhibition, education, or research in furtherance of public service, provide the following amounts relating to these items: Revenue included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 1 Assets included in Form 990, Part X ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | $ $~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | If the organization received or held works of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets for financial gain, provide the following amounts required to be reported under SFAS 116 (ASC 958) relating to these items: Revenue included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 1 Assets included in Form 990, Part X ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | $ $••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• | LHA www.irs.gov/form990. Part I Organizations Maintaining Donor Advised Funds or Other Similar Funds or Accounts. Part II Conservation Easements. Part III Organizations Maintaining Collections of Art, Historical Treasures, or Other Similar Assets. SCHEDULE D Supplemental Financial Statements 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 25 37 DRA F T 53205209-21-15 3 4 5 a b c d e Yes No 1 2 a b c d e f a b Yes No 1c 1d 1e 1f Yes No (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 1 2 3 4 a b c d e f g a b c a b Yes No (i) (ii) 3a(i) 3a(ii) 3b (a) (b) (c) (d) 1a b c d e Total. Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 (continued) (Column (d) must equal Form 990, Part X, column (B), line 10c.) Two years back Three years back Four years back Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 Page Using the organization's acquisition, accession, and other records, check any of the following that are a significant use of its collection items (check all that apply): Public exhibition Scholarly research Preservation for future generations Loan or exchange programs Other Provide a description of the organization's collections and explain how they further the organization's exempt purpose in Part XIII. During the year, did the organization solicit or receive donations of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets to be sold to raise funds rather than to be maintained as part of the organization's collection? •••••••••••• Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 9, or reported an amount on Form 990, Part X, line 21. Is the organization an agent, trustee, custodian or other intermediary for contributions or other assets not included on Form 990, Part X? If "Yes," explain the arrangement in Part XIII and complete the following table: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Amount Beginning balance Additions during the year Distributions during the year Ending balance ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Did the organization include an amount on Form 990, Part X, line 21, for escrow or custodial account liability? If "Yes," explain the arrangement in Part XIII. Check here if the explanation has been provided on Part XIII ~~~~~ ••••••••••••• Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 10. Current year Prior year Beginning of year balance Contributions Net investment earnings, gains, and losses Grants or scholarships ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ Other expenditures for facilities and programs Administrative expenses End of year balance ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Provide the estimated percentage of the current year end balance (line 1g, column (a)) held as: Board designated or quasi-endowment Permanent endowment Temporarily restricted endowment The percentages on lines 2a, 2b, and 2c should equal 100%. |% |% |% Are there endowment funds not in the possession of the organization that are held and administered for the organization by: unrelated organizations related organizations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If "Yes" on line 3a(ii), are the related organizations listed as required on Schedule R? Describe in Part XIII the intended uses of the organization's endowment funds. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 11a. See Form 990, Part X, line 10. Description of property Cost or other basis (investment) Cost or other basis (other) Accumulated depreciation Book value Land Buildings Leasehold improvements ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ Equipment Other ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••••••••• Add lines 1a through 1e. |••••••••••••• 2 Part III Organizations Maintaining Collections of Art, Historical Treasures, or Other Similar Assets Part IV Escrow and Custodial Arrangements. Part V Endowment Funds. Part VI Land, Buildings, and Equipment. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 0. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 26 38 DRA F T (including name of security) 53205309-21-15 Total. Total. (a) (b) (c) (1) (2) (3) (a) (b) (c) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (a) (b) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Total. (a) (b) 1. Total. 2. Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 (Column (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 15.) (Column (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 25.) Description of security or category (Col. (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 12.) | (Col. (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 13.) | Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 Page Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 11b. See Form 990, Part X, line 12. Book value Method of valuation: Cost or end-of-year market value Financial derivatives Closely-held equity interests Other ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 11c. See Form 990, Part X, line 13. Description of investment Book value Method of valuation: Cost or end-of-year market value Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 11d. See Form 990, Part X, line 15. Description Book value ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••| Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 11e or 11f. See Form 990, Part X, line 25. Description of liability Book value (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Federal income taxes ••••• | Liability for uncertain tax positions. In Part XIII, provide the text of the footnote to the organization's financial statements that reports the organization's liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN 48 (ASC 740). Check here if the text of the footnote has been provided in Part XIII 3 Part VII Investments - Other Securities. Part VIII Investments - Program Related. Part IX Other Assets. Part X Other Liabilities. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 ADVANCE TO DMC EDA 50,000. DUE FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS 183,852. 233,852. DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS 51,000. 51,000. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 27 39 DRA F T 53205409-21-15 1 2 3 4 5 1 a b c d e 2a 2b 2c 2d 2a 2d 2e 32e 1 a b c 4a 4b 4a 4b 3 4c. 4c 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 a b c d e 2a 2b 2c 2d 2a 2d 2e 1 2e 3 a b c 4a 4b 4a 4b 3 4c. 4c 5 Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 (This must equal Form 990, Part I, line 12.) (This must equal Form 990, Part I, line 18.) Schedule D (Form 990) 2015 Page Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 12a. Total revenue, gains, and other support per audited financial statements Amounts included on line 1 but not on Form 990, Part VIII, line 12: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments Donated services and use of facilities Recoveries of prior year grants Other (Describe in Part XIII.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines through ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Subtract line from line ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Amounts included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 12, but not on line 1: Investment expenses not included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 7b Other (Describe in Part XIII.) ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines and Total revenue. Add lines and ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ••••••••••••••••• Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 12a. Total expenses and losses per audited financial statements Amounts included on line 1 but not on Form 990, Part IX, line 25: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Donated services and use of facilities Prior year adjustments Other losses Other (Describe in Part XIII.) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines through Subtract line from line ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Amounts included on Form 990, Part IX, line 25, but not on line 1: Investment expenses not included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 7b Other (Describe in Part XIII.) ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Add lines and Total expenses. Add lines and ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••••• Provide the descriptions required for Part II, lines 3, 5, and 9; Part III, lines 1a and 4; Part IV, lines 1b and 2b; Part V, line 4; Part X, line 2; Part XI, lines 2d and 4b; and Part XII, lines 2d and 4b. Also complete this part to provide any additional information. 4 Part XI Reconciliation of Revenue per Audited Financial Statements With Revenue per Return. Part XII Reconciliation of Expenses per Audited Financial Statements With Expenses per Return. Part XIII Supplemental Information. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 3,605,188. 0. 3,605,188. 0. 3,605,188. 3,605,188. 0. 3,605,188. 0. 3,605,188. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 28 40 DRA F T OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service 53221109-02-15 Information about Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) and its instructions is at Complete to provide information for responses to specific questions onForm 990 or 990-EZ or to provide any additional information.| Attach to Form 990 or 990-EZ.| (Form 990 or 990-EZ) Open to PublicInspection Employer identification number For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990 or 990-EZ.Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) (2015) Name of the organization LHA www.irs.gov/form990. SCHEDULE O Supplemental Information to Form 990 or 990-EZ 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 FORM 990, PART I, LINE 1, DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION MISSION: MINNESOTA. FORM 990, PART III, LINE 1, DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION MISSION: AND SUPPORTING THE ECONOMIC GROWTH OF MINNESOTA AND ITS BIOSCIENCES SECTOR. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 7B: ANNUAL FUNDING REQUESTS ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF ROCHESTER CITY COUNCIL. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11: THE 990 WILL BE PRESENTED AT A BOARD MEETING PRIOR TO FILING. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12C: THE DMCC MUST FOLLOW THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST REQUIREMENTS OF MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 469.41, SUBD. 9. IN ADDITION, THE DMCC DIRECTORS ARE PUBLIC OFFICIALS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 10A.01, SUBD. 35. SEE MINN. STAT. SECTION 469.41, SUBD. 10. PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE SUBJECT TO STATUTORY CONFLICT OF INTEREST REQUIREMENTS. MINN. STAT. SECTION 10A.07. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15: DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION DOES NOT HAVE ANY EMPLOYEES. FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19: THE DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION IS SUBJECT TO THE MINNESOTA 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 29 41 DRA F T 532212 09-02-15 2 Employer identification number Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) (2015) Schedule O (Form 990 or 990-EZ) (2015)Page Name of the organization DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT AND OPEN MEETING LAW, AND THEREFORE MAKES ITS GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. FORM 990, PART XII, LINE 2C THE CORPORATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR OVERSIGHT OF THE AUDIT OF ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE SELECTION OF ITS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 30 42 DRA F T OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the TreasuryInternal Revenue Service Section 512(b)(13) controlled entity? 53216109-08-15 SCHEDULE R (Form 990)Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 33, 34, 35b, 36, or 37. Attach to Form 990. Open to PublicInspection| Information about Schedule R (Form 990) and its instructions is at Employer identification number Part I Identification of Disregarded Entities (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f) Identification of Related Tax-Exempt Organizations Part II (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g) Yes No For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990.Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 | | Name of the organization Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 33. Name, address, and EIN (if applicable) of disregarded entity Primary activity Legal domicile (state or foreign country) Total income End-of-year assets Direct controlling entity Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 34 because it had one or more related tax-exemptorganizations during the tax year. Name, address, and EIN of related organization Primary activity Legal domicile (state or foreign country) Exempt Code section Public charity status (if section 501(c)(3)) Direct controlling entity LHA www.irs.gov/form990. Related Organizations and Unrelated Partnerships 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 46-4893585, 200 1ST PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE STREET SW, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 DMCC MINNESOTA 501(C)(3) LINE 11A, I N/A X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 31 43 DRA F T Disproportionate allocations? Legal domicile (state or foreign country) General or managing partner? Section512(b)(13)controlledentity? Legal domicile (state or foreign country) 532162 09-08-15 2 Identification of Related Organizations Taxable as a Partnership Part III (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i) (j) (k) Yes No Yes No Identification of Related Organizations Taxable as a Corporation or Trust Part IV (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) (i) Yes No Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Predominant income(related, unrelated,excluded from tax undersections 512-514) Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Page Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 34 because it had one or more relatedorganizations treated as a partnership during the tax year. Name, address, and EINof related organization Primary activity Direct controllingentity Share of totalincome Share ofend-of-yearassets Code V-UBIamount in box20 of ScheduleK-1 (Form 1065) Percentageownership Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 34 because it had one or more relatedorganizations treated as a corporation or trust during the tax year. Name, address, and EINof related organization Primary activity Direct controllingentity Type of entity(C corp, S corp,or trust) Share of totalincome Share ofend-of-yearassets Percentageownership DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 32 44 DRA F T 532163 09-08-15 3 Part V Transactions With Related Organizations Note.Yes No 1 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 1g 1h 1i 1j 1k 1l 1m 1n 1o 1p 1q 1r 1s 2 (a)(b)(c)(d) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Page Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 34, 35b, or 36. Complete line 1 if any entity is listed in Parts II, III, or IV of this schedule. During the tax year, did the organization engage in any of the following transactions with one or more related organizations listed in Parts II-IV? Receipt of interest, annuities, royalties, or rent from a controlled entity ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Gift, grant, or capital contribution to related organization(s) Gift, grant, or capital contribution from related organization(s) Loans or loan guarantees to or for related organization(s) Loans or loan guarantees by related organization(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dividends from related organization(s)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sale of assets to related organization(s) Purchase of assets from related organization(s) Exchange of assets with related organization(s) Lease of facilities, equipment, or other assets to related organization(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lease of facilities, equipment, or other assets from related organization(s) Performance of services or membership or fundraising solicitations for related organization(s) Performance of services or membership or fundraising solicitations by related organization(s) Sharing of facilities, equipment, mailing lists, or other assets with related organization(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sharing of paid employees with related organization(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Reimbursement paid to related organization(s) for expenses Reimbursement paid by related organization(s) for expenses ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Other transfer of cash or property to related organization(s) Other transfer of cash or property from related organization(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• If the answer to any of the above is "Yes," see the instructions for information on who must complete this line, including covered relationships and transaction thresholds. Name of related organization Transaction type (a-s) Amount involved Method of determining amount involved DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 33 45 DRA F T Are allpartners sec.501(c)(3)orgs.? Dispropor-tionate allocations? General or managing partner? 53216409-08-15 Yes No Yes No Yes N 4 Part VI Unrelated Organizations Taxable as a Partnership (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h) (i) (j) (k) o Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Predominant income(related, unrelated,excluded from tax undersections 512-514) Code V-UBIamount in box 20of Schedule K-1(Form 1065) Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Page Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 37. Provide the following information for each entity taxed as a partnership through which the organization conducted more than five percent of its activities (measured by total assets or gross revenue) that was not a related organization. See instructions regarding exclusion for certain investment partnerships. Name, address, and EIN of entity Primary activity Legal domicile (state or foreign country) Share of total income Share of end-of-year assets Percentage ownership DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 34 46 DRA F T 532165 09-08-15 5 Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Schedule R (Form 990) 2015 Page Provide additional information for responses to questions on Schedule R (see instructions). Part VII Supplemental Information DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 46-4959371 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 35 47 DRA F T 50094104-01-15 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FOR THE YEAR ENDING Prepared for Prepared by Amount due or refund Make check payable to Mail tax return and check (if applicable) to Return must be mailed on or before Special Instructions TAX RETURN FILING INSTRUCTIONS MINNESOTA ANNUAL REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 201 4TH STREET SE NO. 204 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP P.O. BOX 217 AUSTIN, MN 55912 507-434-7000 BALANCE DUE OF $25.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SUITE 1200, BREMER TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MN 55101-2130 NOVEMBER 15, 2016 THE REPORT SHOULD BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUAL(S). INCLUDE THE ORGANIZATION'S FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND "2015 ANNUAL REPORT" ON THE REMITTANCE. 48 DRA F T 59980104-01-15 ATTORNEY GENERAL LORI SWANSON Annual Reporting Initial Registration Office Use Only: ARF $25 $50 N (e-Postcard) 990 EZ PF FES SIG BD SAL Audit Legal Name of Organization: Mailing Address of Organization (required)Physical Address of Organization (required) Contact Person Tel. No. E-mail Fax No. SUITE 1200, BREMER TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MN 55101-2130 (651) 757-1311 (651) 296-1410 (TTY) www.ag.state.mn.us 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. If annual reporting, is this a new name since the organization's last filing?Yes No If so, please state former name: List all names under which the organization solicits contributions: Does the organization use the services of a professional fund-raiser (outside solicitor or consultant)? Yes No If so, provide name and address of any outside professional fund-raiser employed by the organization and state the total amount of compensation each outside fund-raiser received from the filing organization during the year. Name Address City State ZIP Compensation a) b) Does this professional fund-raiser solicit or consult in Minnesota?Yes No Is this professional fund-raiser registered to solicit or consult in Minnesota?Yes No Month and day accounting year ends: Has the organization included the filing fee, late fee (if any) and all attachments required by the instructions?Yes No 01/13 Upon request this material can be made available in alternate formats. Attach schedule if more than one. FEDERAL EIN NUMBER: FOR YEAR ENDING: SECTION A: REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR INITIAL REGISTRATION & ANNUAL REPORTING CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION INITIAL REGISTRATION & ANNUAL REPORT FORM STATE OF MINNESOTA X 46-4959371 12/31/2015 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION X DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION 201 4TH STREET SE 201 4TH STREET SE ROCHESTER, MN 55904 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 DALE MARTINSON DMARTINSON@ROCHESTERMN.GOV 507-328-2850 X 12/31 X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 2 49 DRA F T 59980204-01-15 $ 9. This Section A(9) must be completed by organizations filing a 990-N (e-Postcard) or organizations whose filing does not contain the information requested below. This includes organizations that: 1) do not file an IRS Form 990, 2) file an IRS Form 990-EZ or 990-PF, or 3) organizations that file a group return that does not include the filing organization's individual financial information. Contributions from the public Government Grants Other revenue $ $ $ EXCESS or DEFICIT TOTAL Assets TOTAL Liabilities $ $ $ (Assets minus Liabilities)$ 2 INCOME TOTAL REVENUE END OF YEAR FUND BALANCE/NET WORTH 2,868. 3,602,319. 1. 3,605,188. 0. 250,340. 250,340. 0. 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 3 50 DRA F T 59981104-01-15 Attach Name/Title Compensation Deferred Compensation Fringe Benefits 1 2 3 4 5 Attach Attach a GAAP audit If yes, NOTE: By answering YES to the above question, you are attesting that the IRS informational return filed with this office is an exact copy, including all schedules and attachments, of the IRS informational return filed with the IRS (excluding Schedule B or any other donor list the IRS may require). 1. 2. 3. Has the organization's accounting year changed since the last report was filed? provide the new year-end date: Yes No an explanation if there has been any change in the organization's tax status with the Internal Revenue Service; a significant change in the purposes of the organization; or if the organization's right to solicit funds has been denied, suspended, revoked or enjoined by any state agency or court in any state, or if there are proceedings pending.None Attached List of the five highest paid directors, officers, and employees of the organization and its related organizations, as that term is defined by section 317A.011, subdivision 18, that receive total compensation of more than $100,000, together with the compensation paid to each. For purposes of this subdivision, "compensation" is defined as the total amount reported on Form W-2 (Box 5) or Form 1099-MISC (Box 7) issued by the organization and its related organizations to the individual. The value of fringe benefits and deferred compensation paid by the charitable organization and all related organizations as that term is defined by section 317A.011, subdivision 18, shall also be reported as a separate item for each person whose compensation is required to be reported pursuant to this subdivision. 4. 5. 6. a list of organization's board of directors.Attached Included in IRS return if total revenue exceeds $750,000.Attached Audit not included under the Food Shelf Exemption (excluding from total revenue the value of food donated to a nonprofit food shelf for redistribution at no cost).Audit not required Minnesota law requires that an organization file a copy of all tax or informational returns filed with the IRS, including IRS Form 990-N (e-Postcard), 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF, including all schedules and amendments. Has the organization included with this annual report a copy of all tax or informational returns, including IRS Form 990-N (e-Postcard), 990, 990-EZ or 990-PF that it filed with the IRS (excluding Schedule B or any other donor list)?Yes No (Not required to file a return with IRS or files a group return). 4 ALL Annual Report filers MUST complete questions 1-6 SECTION C: REQUIRED FOR ANNUAL REPORTING ONLY X X X X X 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 4 51 DRA F T 59981204-01-15 Total functional expenses. (A)(B)(C)(D) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 a b c d e f g a b c d Joint costs. Must be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.For 990-EZ filers: Column A, Line 25 should equal line 17 IRS Form 990-EZFor 990-PF filers: Column A, Line 25 should equal line 26 IRS Form 990-PFThe total of Column A, lines 1 through 24d should equal line 25a.The total of lines 25b, 25c and 25d, should equal line 25a Grants and other assistance to individuals in the U.S. Compensation not included above, to disqualified persons (as defined under section 4958(f)(1) and persons described in section 4958(c)(3)(B) (include section 401(k) and section 403(b) employer contributions) Add lines 1 through 24d 7. This Section C(7) must be completed by organizations that: 1) do not file an informational return with the IRS; 2) file a 990-N (e-Postcard), 990-EZ, or 990-PF; 3) file a group return that does not include the filing organization's functional expense information; or 4) file an IRS Form 990 that does not contain a completed functional expenses statement within the IRS Form 990. Total expenses Program service expenses Management and general expenses Fundraising expenses Grants and other assistance to governments and organizations in the U.S. Grants and other assistance to governments, organizations, and individuals outside the U.S. Benefits paid to or for members Compensation of current officers, directors, trustees, and key employees Other salaries and wages Pension plan contributions Other employee benefits Payroll taxes Fees for services (non-employees): Management Legal Accounting Lobbying Professional fundraising services Investment management fees Other Advertising and promotion Office expenses Information technology Royalties Occupancy Travel Payments of travel or entertainment expenses for any federal, state, or local public officials Conferences, conventions, and meetings Interest Payments to affiliates Depreciation, depletion, and amortization Insurance Other expenses. Itemize expenses not coveredabove. (Expenses grouped together andlabeled miscellaneous may not exceed 5% oftotal expenses shown on line 25 below.) All other expenses Check here | if following SOP 98-2. Complete this line only if the organi-zation reported in column (B) joint costs from acombined educational campaign andfundraising solicitation 5 Statement of Functional Expenses 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 5 52 DRA F T 59981304-01-15 We, the undersigned, state and acknowledge that we are duly constituted officers of this organization, being the (Title) and (Title) respectively, and that we execute this document on behalf of the organization pursuant to the resolution of the (Board of Directors, Trustees, or Managing Group) adopted on the day of , 20 , approving the contents of the document, and do hereby certify that the (Board of Directors, Trustees, or Managing Group) has assumed, and will continue to assume, responsibility for determining matters of policy, and have supervised, and will continue to supervise, the finances of the organization. We further state that the information supplied is true, correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. Name (Print)Name (Print) Signature Signature Title Title Date Date AG: #3124563-v1 6 SECTION D: REQUIRED FOR INITIAL REGISTRATION & ANNUAL REPORTING BOARD OF DIRECTORS SIGNATURES AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT * NOTICE * Documents required to be filed are public records. Please do not include social security numbers, driver's license numbers or bank account numbers on the documents filed with this Office as they are not required, but could become part of the public records. A charitable organization is not required to file a list of its donors. If it is included, it may become part of the public file. TREASURER CHAIR BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD OF DIRECTORS JAMES V. BIER TINA FLINT SMITH TREASURER CHAIR 13200816 132902 094-08292400 2015.04010 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER 094-94G1 6 53 A. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION RESOLUTION NO. ___-2016 Approving the 2016 State of Minnesota Charitable Organization Annual Report and 2015 Form 990 BACKGROUND RECITALS A. On behalf of the Destination Medical Center Corporation (“DMCC”), CliftonLarsonAllen (“CLA”) prepared the 2016 State of Minnesota Charitable Organization Annual Report (the “Annual Report”) and 2015 Form 990 (the “Form 990”) and is recommending that the DMCC approve both items. B. The Annual Report and Form 990 were presented to the DMCC on August 25, 2016, and are on file with the DMCC. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Destination Medical Center Corporation, that the 2016 State of Minnesota Charitable Organization Annual Report and 2015 Form 990 are approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board authorizes the Chair or Treasurer to take any action or make any amendments necessary and to file the Annual Report and Form 990. 850742.DOCX 54 J8614 | Transportation & Infrastructure Program Management | City of Rochester August 17, 2016 Mr. Richard Freese City of Rochester Program Manager RE: TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UPDATE Dear Mr. Freese: Attached, please find the monthly progress reports for June and July 2016. City and SRF staff have completed the scoping, scheduling, budgeting, and contracting for the four transit planning studies that will serve as the foundation for future improvements to the Destination Medical Center. These four studies are: • Transit Circulator Study • Street / Operations Study • Parking / TMA Study • City Loop Study A quick summary of the recent Program Management accomplishments include: • SRF / City agreement amended to include four transit studies • Evaluation of cash flow needs to support the transit studies • Approval of County funding to support the Transit studies • Acquired DMC Plan data from Nelson Nygaard and Kimley-Horn o 812 files exceeding 35GB of data • Established Transit Study coordination meetings o September 1, Knowledge Sharing meeting o September 20/21, Transit Studies Coordination meeting #1 • Communication / Public Outreach coordination meetings with City / EDA / SRF o One Voice and coordinated messaging focus • Established GIS document flow procedure for transit studies • Develop Interim parking strategy and documentation • New technologies research and coordination • WMBE Implementation plan drafted Kenneth A. Holte Program Manager SRF Consulting Group, Inc. 55 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JUNE 2016 City of Rochester |Program Management Transportation & Infrastructure Program Management SRF Consulting Group, Inc. www.srfconsulting.com Prepared By: July 10, 2016 56 1 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JUNE 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management 1. Work Task Activity this Past Month a. Prepare presentation for City Committee of the Whole b. Prepare presentation for Joint DMCC/ EDA Board / City Council meeting c. Conduct several meetings to resolve funding issues d. Negotiated final transit studies scopes and budgets e. Modified cash Flow analysis for Transit studies f. Established e-Builder structure for Transit Studies g. Developed contract language and structure for Transit Studies h. Developed WMBE program outline and implementation plan i. Drafted Interim parking strategy 2. Work Task Items completed this past month a. Conducted meeting with county Administration regarding Purpose & Need for funding and amounts b. Integrated Transit Studies Budget review meeting c. Presented update to Committee of the Whole d. Presented update to DMCC Board, EDA board, and City Council e. Conducted weekly Program Mangers (PM) conference calls. f. Conducted monthly Program Management Team (PMT) Meeting. g. Conducted monthly Transportation Work Group (TWG) meeting. 3. Status of Program Management Topic Status Management 1. Core Leadership Meetings Meeting on Bi-Weekly basis 2. E-builder Discovery On Hold 3. E-builder Programing and Training Programming is ongoing 4. Invoicing and Status Report Monthly progress report 20 Year Program and 5 Year Plan 1. Chart of Accounts/Cost Breakdown Structure/Work Breakdown Structure Work has begun and is ongoing, 2. Work Breakdown Schedule Master Plan DMC plan schedule completed, 3. Financial Reporting Anticipated third/fourth quarter 2016 57 2 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JUNE 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management 4. Financial Interface Anticipated third/fourth quarter 2016 5. 15-Month Critical Path Method Schedule One year, five year schedule developed Studies 1. Transit and Street Study Amendment to Master agreement developed. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 2. Integrated Management of Travel Demand and Parking Amendment to Master agreement developed. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 3. City Loop and Cultural Crescent Development Plan Amendment to Master agreement developed. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 4. Long Term Capital Investment and Financing Program Anticipated third/fourth quarter 2016 City/Stake Holder Coordination 1. Program Management Plan Chapters reviewed, simplified approach to document 2. Scenario Planning Anticipated third/fourth quarter 2016 3. Outreach Materials No efforts needed to date. Continued coordination with DMC EDA Meetings 1. Weekly Program Managers Conference Call Meetings held June 7, 14, 21, 28 2. Monthly Program Management Team Meeting held June 9 3. Quarterly Technical Advisory Committee Meetings consolidated, no longer being held 4. Monthly DMCC Board Meetings Meeting held June 23 5. Monthly Transportation Work Group Meeting held June 15 58 3 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JUNE 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management 4. Ongoing Monitoring / Resolutions Needed Topic Status/Timeline TDP and Comp Plan coordination Fall 2016 Metro design center standards recommendations Draft Spring 2016 Funding sources for infrastructure to support Saint Mary’s hospital expansion: projects SS1 and SS2 Projects SS1 and SS2 moved to 2017 Obtaining GIS-based information from DMC EDA regarding development Plan graphics, boundaries, images, etc. Data needs reviewed with T. Brennan. Additional meeting with PW, RPU, and Planning being scheduled Institutional/Historical information sharing from EDA Data Needs reviewed with T. Brennan, additional knowledge transfer being scheduled 5. Status of PMC Traffic and Infrastructure Projects Project Status 2015 Green Stormwater Plan KHA preparing Grant study for City; Demo Project #1 in 2016 Transit/Transportation/Infrastructure Management Work is ongoing 2016 3rd St. SW Reconstruct/Design Developing procurement schedule and project approach SS1 12th Ave. Sewer Capacity City staff preliminary design completed. Coordinating with St. Mary’s Staff SS2 Cooke Park Sewer Capacity Design is complete Broadway @ Center Ramp 75% of design is complete Shared Parking Study/Program Development Consultant scopes and budgets finalized, coordinated schedule and task between all transit studies, developed master agreement amendment, drafted sub agreement documents. City Loop Plan Consultant scopes and budgets finalized, coordinated schedule and task between all transit studies, developed master agreement amendment, drafted sub agreement documents. 59 4 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JUNE 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management Transit/Transportation/Infrastructure Management Work is ongoing, focus is on transit study projects Transit Circulator Study Consultant scopes and budgets finalized, coordinated schedule and task between all transit studies, developed master agreement amendment, drafted sub agreement documents 6. Staff next steps and/or upcoming activities a. Meetings that are scheduled 1. PM Weekly Calls – July 5, 12, 19, 26 2. PMT Monthly Meeting – July 14 3. TWG Meeting – July 20 4. DMCC Board Meeting – August 25 COR_DMC_RPT_Monthly Progress_201606.docx 60 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JULY 2016 City of Rochester |Program Management Transportation & Infrastructure Program Management SRF Consulting Group, Inc. www.srfconsulting.com Prepared By: August 10, 2016 61 1 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JULY 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management 1. Work Task Activity this Past Month a. Modified cash Flow analysis for Transit studies b. Established e-Builder structure for Transit Studies c. Coordinating with NN on DMC Plan development d. WMBE Implementation Plan drafted, reviewed, edited e. Coordinating Interim parking strategy with city f. Coordinating GIS sharing with City PW, County planning, and RPU g. Drafted studies management Plan for Transit studies h. New technologies research and discussion 2. Work Task Items completed this past month a. Negotiated final scopes and budgets with subconsultants b. City Council approval of transit studies budgets c. County Board approval of Transit studies funding d. Completed data transfer from NN of DMC Plan development information e. Completed draft timeline of Integrated Transit studies f. Attended Prototyping Pitch event, July 19 g. Attended St. Paul site visit tour, July 29 h. Conducted weekly Program Mangers (PM) conference calls. i. Monthly Program Management Team (PMT) Meeting was not held. j. Conducted monthly Transportation Work Group (TWG) meeting. 3. Status of Program Management Topic Status Management 1. Core Leadership Meetings Meeting on Bi-Weekly basis 2. E-builder Discovery On Hold 3. E-builder Programing and Training On Hold 4. Invoicing and Status Report Monthly progress report 20 Year Program and 5 Year Plan 1. Chart of Accounts/Cost Breakdown Structure/Work Breakdown Structure On Hold 2. Work Breakdown Schedule Master Plan DMC plan schedule completed, On Hold 3. Financial Reporting Anticipated fourth quarter 2016 62 2 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JULY 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management 4. Financial Interface Anticipated fourth quarter 2016 5. 15-Month Critical Path Method Schedule One year, five year schedule developed, On Hold Studies 1. Transit Circulator Study City Council approval of budget on July 6th. Amendment to Master agreement awaiting final signatures and execution. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 2. Street / operations Study City Council approval of budget on July 6th. Amendment to Master agreement awaiting final signatures and execution. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 3. Parking / TMA Study City Council approval of budget on July 6th. Amendment to Master agreement awaiting final signatures and execution. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 4. City Loop Study City Council approval of budget on July 6th. Amendment to Master agreement awaiting final signatures and execution. This is now a DMC project and will be tracked below in the CIP update. 5. Long Term Capital Investment and Financing Program Anticipated fourth quarter 2016 City/Stake Holder Coordination 1. Program Management Plan Chapters reviewed, simplified approach to document , On Hold 2. Scenario Planning Anticipated fourth quarter 2016 3. Outreach Materials No efforts needed to date. Continued coordination with DMC EDA. Held coordination meeting with EDA regarding transit studies. 63 3 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JULY 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management Meetings 1. Weekly Program Managers Conference Call Meetings held July 5, 12 2. Monthly Program Management Team Meeting not held 3. Quarterly Technical Advisory Committee Meetings consolidated, no longer being held 4. Monthly DMCC Board Meetings Meeting not held 5. Monthly Transportation Work Group Meeting held July 20 6. PMC / City one-on-one meeting Meeting held July 20 4. Ongoing Monitoring / Resolutions Needed Topic Status/Timeline TDP and Comp Plan coordination Fall 2016 Metro design center standards recommendations To be sent to city council for approval next month. Funding sources for infrastructure to support Saint Mary’s hospital expansion: projects SS1 and SS2 Projects SS1 and SS2 moved to 2017 Obtaining GIS-based information from DMC EDA regarding development Plan graphics, boundaries, images, etc. Data received from NN from DMC Plan development. This item has been resolved. Institutional/Historical information sharing from EDA Data received from NN from DMC Plan development. September 1 workshop to complete institutional knowledge transfer. 5. Status of PMC Traffic and Infrastructure Projects Project Status 2015 Green Stormwater Plan KHA preparing Grant study for City; Demo Project #1 in 2016 64 4 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JULY 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management Transit/Transportation/Infrastructure Management (PMC) Completed. 2016 3rd St. SW Reconstruct/Design Procurement schedule and project approach developed. On Hold. SS1 12th Ave. Sewer Capacity City staff preliminary design completed. Coordinating with St. Mary’s Staff. On Hold. SS2 Cooke Park Sewer Capacity Design is complete. On Hold. Broadway @ Center Ramp 75% of design is complete Transit Circulator study City Council Approval of Budget on July 6th. County Board approval of funding July 11th. SRF / City master agreement amendment in process for signatures and execution. Data transfer from DMC Plan efforts completed. Coordination with NN regarding DMC vision and development initiated. Subconsultant agreements drafted. Street / operations Study City Council Approval of Budget on July 6th. County Board approval of funding July 11th. SRF / City master agreement amendment in process for signatures and execution. Data transfer from DMC Plan efforts completed. Coordination with NN regarding DMC vision and development initiated. Subconsultant agreements drafted. Parking / TMA Study City Council Approval of Budget on July 6th. County Board approval of funding July 11th. SRF / City master agreement amendment in process for signatures and execution. Data transfer from DMC Plan efforts completed. Coordination with NN regarding DMC vision and development initiated. Subconsultant agreements drafted. City Loop Study City Council Approval of Budget on July 6th. County Board approval of funding July 11th. SRF / City master agreement amendment in process for signatures and execution. Data transfer from DMC Plan efforts completed. Coordination with NN regarding DMC vision and development initiated. Subconsultant agreements drafted. Transit/Transportation/Infrastructure Management (PMC) Work is ongoing, focus is on transit study projects. 2017 Budget discussions. 65 5 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT JULY 2016 | City of Rochester |Program Management 6. Staff next steps and/or upcoming activities a. Meetings that are scheduled 1. PM Weekly Calls – August 2, 9, 16, 23, 30 2. PMT Monthly Meeting – August 11 3. TWG Meeting – August 17 4. DMCC Board Meeting – August 25 COR_DMC_RPT_Monthly Progress_201607.docx 66 Heart of the City To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: August 19, 2016 Background: On Monday, August 15, the Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee (CAC) convened to conduct interviews of the three finalist teams for the Heart of the City Public Space Design, led by RSP Architects, HGA Architects, and Sasaki Associates, respectively. Following the team presentations and interviews, the CAC ranked each team based on each committee members’ impression of each team’s proposal and presentation. The CAC then discussed the merits of each proposal, arriving at consensus support for the RSP Architects-led team, which includes Coen + Partners, 9.Square, HR&A Advisors, and Kimley-Horn. The timeline, which includes periods for establishing a vision and context, concept design, schematic design, and implementation planning, extends through June 2017. Next Steps: The proposal supported by the CAC will be presented to the City Council on September 7. 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER RFP PROCESS UPDATE – CONSULTANT OVERVIEW Heart of the City Public Space Design Status Report August 19, 2016 Heart of the City Advisory Committee Roles and Responsibilities The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) for the Heart of the City public space design was formed in collaboration with the City of Rochester and the Destination Medical Center Corporation (DMC Corporation). This volunteer committee assists with the planning and design for the public spaces of the Heart of the City, a sub-district of the Destination Medical Center (DMC) Development Plan at the intersection of First Street SW and First Avenue SW. • Participate in the interview process and make recommendations from the pool of qualified design firms for the RFP. • Assist in community engagement, including establishing a process to keep the adjacent property-owners updated and advised on the progress. • Meet with Design Team to provide input and reaction to design concepts. • Make recommendations to DMCC and City of Rochester at key project milestones. • Attend five to eight committee meetings during the 2016-2017 design process. Overview of RFQ Process Request for Qualifications were sent on February 5, 2016. • Issued requests for qualifications for: o The qualifications submission include the following information: Introductory letter and general description of your firm; Firm background and business organization information; Provide examples of projects and Design Team makeup. • Outcome o Eleven qualifications were received and reviewed by the Community Advisory Committee. A short list of six qualified firms were sent the Request for Proposals. o The DMCC and City issued RFPs to the selected/shortlisted firms, each of whom were asked to submit detailed proposals (including fees) based on a specific scope of services and a project budget and schedule. Overview of RFP Process Request for Proposals were sent on June 3, 2016. • Issued requests for proposal for: o The Destination Medical Center development plan presents a vision, several illustrative concepts, and set of principles for Heart of the City. DMCC and the City of Rochester wishes to retain a design firm to advance this vision. The selected firm will be responsible for the next phases of design: pre-design through schematic design, including a recommended phasing and implementation strategy. o Phase I/Pre-Design: Programming Context Analysis Concept Design Gross Budget o Phase II/Schematic Design: Various Alternatives Preferred Scheme Preferred Scheme Cost Estimate (Including estimated annual operating and maintenance costs) Phasing and Implementation Strategy • A proposers meeting and walk-through was held on June 17th, allowing teams on opportunity to better understand project scope and expectations. • Submissions we due and received on July 15th by all six firms who were invited to participate. 75 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER RFP PROCESS UPDATE – CONSULTANT OVERVIEW • Outcome o The sub-committee of the Community Advisory Committee met to review and consider all of the proposals to determine a subset for final interview by the full Committee. The group considered each proposal for project understanding, team composition, work plan, process, and timetable, prior projects, and fee. Three teams have been invited back to be interviewed by the Community Advisory Committee. o On Monday, August 15, the Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee (CAC) convened to conduct interviews of the three finalist teams for the Heart of the City Public Space Design, led by RSP Architects, HGA, and Sasaki, respectively. Following the team presentations and interviews, the CAC ranked each team based on each committee members’ impression of each team’s proposal and presentation. The CAC then discussed the merits of each proposal, arriving at consensus support for the RSP Architects-led team, which includes Coen + Partners, 9.Square, HR&A Advisors, and Kimley-Horn. • Next Step o The Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee will recommend the design team led by RSP Architects to the DMCC Board and the City Council. Schedule and key milestone dates included: o February 5, 2016: RFQ Distribution o March 4, 2016: Qualifications Due o May 18, 2016: Heart of the City CAC Meeting o June 3, 2016: RFP Distribution o June 17, 2016: Site Walk Through and Proposers Meeting o July 15, 2016: Proposals Due o July 25, 2016: Heart of the City Sub-Committee Meeting o August 15, 2016: Heart of the City CAC Meeting o August 25, 2016: DMCC Board Meeting o September 7, 2016: City Council Meeting Summary of Proposals: Lead Firm Team Makeup Total Cost of Proposal Cost by Phase Schedule HGA GEHL Studio $505,000 + $55,000 reimbursable Phase 1: $280,000 6 months start to finish Office of James Burnett Phase 2: $225,000 RSP Architects Coen+Partners $577,440 + $21,500 reimbursable Phase 1: $164,120 10/1/2016 - 6/30/2017 HR&A Advisors Phase 2: $144,220 Kimley-Horn Phase 3: $208,960 9-Square Phase 4: $60,140 Sasaki Damon Farber Associates $448,000 + $50,000 reimbursable Phase 1: $217,200 9/1/2016 - 1/26/2017 WHKS Phase 2: $230,800 Schuler Shock Commercial Aquatic Engineering Stantec ### 76 Request for Proposals (RFP) Heart of the City, Public Space Design Rochester, MN Release Date: June 3, 2016 By Invitation Only Staff member contact: Patrick Seeb, Director Economic Development and Placemaking Destination Medical Center, Economic Development Agency 195 South Broadway, Suite 12 Rochester, MN 55902 1. INTRODUCTION: Thank you for submitting your qualifications to serve as the designer for the public spaces associated with the Heart of the City Sub-District of the Destination Medical Center development plan. The Community Advisory Committee for Destination Medical Center Corporation (DMCC) and the City of Rochester is pleased to invite you to submit a response to this Request for Proposals. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES: The Destination Medical Center development plan presents a vision, several illustrative concepts, and set of principles for Heart of the City. DMCC and the City of Rochester wishes to retain a design firm to advance this vision. The selected firm will be responsible for the next phases of design: pre-design through schematic design, including a recommended phasing and implementation strategy. Phase I/Pre-Design: -Programming -Context Analysis -Concept Design -Gross Budget Phase II/Schematic Design: -Various Alternatives -Preferred Scheme -Preferred Scheme Cost Estimate (Including estimated annual operating and maintenance costs) -Phasing and Implementation Strategy 77 3. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS Proposals must be received in writing (25 copies) and electronically by 4:00pm, Friday, July 15, 2016. All proposals, questions, and correspondence should be directed to: Cody Pogalz, Executive Assistant, Destination Medical Center. Cody Pogalz, Executive Assistant Destination Medical Center 195 South Broadway, Suite 12 Rochester, MN 55902 codypogalz@dmceda.org 4. STATEMENT OF CONTENT OF RFP (Proposal must contain the following) A. Title Page (name, address, phone, contact person, date) B. Table of Contents C. Statement of Project Understanding (no more than one page) D. Project Approach/Firm Philosophy (no more than one page) E. Proposed Work Plan (no more than six pages) F. Proposed Schedule (visual chart) (no more than two pages) G. Organization Chart (no more than one page) H. Resumes of Staff, including subconsultants (no more than six pages) I. Total Fee Proposal (no more than one page) J. Breakdown of Total Fee (pages as necessary) • Fee by Task • Fee by Firm or Subconsultant K. Three project and client references (no more than one page) L. Any other information deemed helpful in demonstrating the proposers ability to successfully complete the project (no more than four pages) 5. TIMETABLE June 3, 2016: RFP Distribution June 17, 2016: Site Walk-through and Proposers Meeting 10:00-12:00noon Location TBD Rochester, MN July 15, 2016: Proposals Due, 4:00pm CST w/o Aug 15, 2016: Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee Finalist Review ### 78 PUBLIC SPACE DESIGN SERVICES: HEART OF THE CITY SUB-DISTRICTPROPOSAL 7.15.2016 RSP ARCHITECTS • COEN+PARTNERS • 9.SQUARE • HR&A ADVISORS • KIMLEY-HORN Jon Buggy, AIA, NCARB 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55413 612.677.7163 • jon.buggy@rsparch.com 79 15 July 2016 Patrick Seeb, Director Economic Development and Placemaking Destination Medical Center, Economic Development Agency 195 South Broadway, Suite 12 Rochester, MN 55902 Dear Patrick and members of the Community Advisory Committee, As we’ve worked through the process of assembling a team, various stories and histories of Rochester have come to the forefront of our discussion. St Mary’s Peace Garden was Shane Coen’s first published project. It was followed by national recognition for a community plan driven by an innovative local developer. Rochester is the longtime home of our economic development advisor’s grandparents and continues to be a summer vacation destination. As Rochester has evolved from a small community to a regional hub of activity, Kimley-Horn has been instrumental in the evolution of the City’s transportation plan. The same evolution has generated new interest in community engagement and contemporary design. 9.Square has formed a thoughtful design practice rooted in this new interest and sits at the heart of a burgeoning design community. For me, Rochester was instrumental in shaping my career as an Architect. As a City, it has a unique pulse and identity. Rochester is truly a wonderful place to live, play and work. It has an awesome potential to become much better, more livable and memorable. RSP Architects, through a wide range of projects and initiatives, has built deep connections to the Rochester community. We work with business leaders, community stakeholders and City officials on a daily basis. We are engaged in the community’s desire to harness growth that is economically and environmentally sustainable. We also understand the complexity and impact of the DMC initiative — the goals are lofty, the stakes are high, and the stakeholders vary dramatically — from patients visiting Rochester from the other side of the world to small business owners whose livelihood hangs in the balance; from recent college graduates finding their first job to parents of children visiting for a specialty surgery. Over the following 12-months, this vision must evolve into a plan that works and is understood and accepted by the broad base of stakeholders. The plan must be equally exciting and economically viable, durable and sustainable. We believe that the solution reaches beyond design of a space — it’s about creating a PLACE that people want to be. We have assembled a team that balances international experience with local roots and a deep understanding of what makes Rochester unique. We have proposed a process — successfully delivered by our partners for years — that builds consensus through genuine collaboration with stakeholders to define the character, function and use of a space. The goals of the DMC and the City of Rochester have been central to our thinking and team composition. We have the experience to deliver an implementable plan and a successful constructed public realm that is beautiful, contextual and loved by the community. We are honored to present our team’s work and approach to this dynamic opportunity and look forward to further collaboration! Sincerely, Jon Buggy, AIA, NCARB Principal / Project Executive RSP Architects 80 “CITIES HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF PROVIDING SOMETHING FOR EVERYBODY, ONLY BECAUSE, AND ONLY WHEN, THEY ARE CREATED BY EVERYBODY.” Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities “ROCHESTER IS DOING ALL THE RIGHT THINGS… WE CAN NO LONGER HAVE MASTER PLANS THAT ARE JUST IMPOSED ON COMMUNITIES. WE NEED TO FIND A PROCESS WHEREBY THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY’S VOICE IS HEARD.” Tom Fisher, DMC Interview February 16, 2016 81 OUR UNDERSTANDING .........2 OUR APPROACH + PHILOSOPHY ...3 PROPOSED WORK PLAN ........4 PROPOSED SCHEDULE .........10 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ......12 RESUMES ..................13 FEE .......................18 FEE BREAKDOWN ............19 REFERENCES ................22 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ....23 82 2 OUR UNDERSTANDING A HOLISTIC VISION The DMC Development District encompasses six unique places: Heart of the City, Discovery Square, Downtown Waterfront, Central Station, St. Mary’s Place and UMR & Recreation. Together, these sub-districts create a place that embraces Mayo Clinic’s international prominence and Rochester’s future as a global destination. This proposal focuses on bringing renewed vitality to the core of Heart of the City including First and Peace Plaza. Together, these places form a network of connected spaces and urban experiences that build off the City’s convenience and walkability. The RSP team is home-based in MN with a specific relationship to Rochester. Our work will be steeped in bringing forth authentic Rochester with a keen eye toward the America’s City for Health initiative. We understand the existing attributes that should be closely intertwined with new public areas, developments and engaging attractions that are inviting and accessible. We have developed a project understanding and approach informed by a human-centric discovery process based on year-round programming of the space. In our collective experience, this approach results in vibrant and successful public spaces that are sustainable over time. The end result will be a design that is tailor-made for those programs. RSP has carefully selected team members for their expertise in visioning, programming and user experience consulting in constructing public spaces in Minnesota. A powerful strength of our team is that our individual and collective portfolios include national and international projects of similar scope and scale as Heart of the City. This situates us in the prime position to create a world renowned destination and remain true to the defining attributes and character of the City of Rochester, both in our process and design. The Heart of the City public space design requires a clear strategy that balances big moves with incremental, organic city growth. The design needs to respond to the DMC master plan, be grounded in the reality of the site and create a defining experience. We understand the challenges of integrating skyways, streets and subways into a unified experience. Our team is focused on finding the right solution for the future of Rochester. THE CURRENT EXPERIENCE 83 3 1 - DISCOVER We gain a deep understanding of the current experience and the great work you’ve done to- date. We identify any knowledge gaps on user experience that will help us identify our goals. We share knowledge, data and insights, and perhaps gather new ones, to be certain that we are on the right track. 2 - DREAM We assess what has been done before, then we dream of the ideal next step — which isn’t necessarily the most obvious step. We put ourselves in the shoes of your stakeholders and ask what would make their experience something to remember. It is not our dream we are creating, it is theirs. 3 - DESIGN We design for you, or more specifically for your end user and stakeholders. Our designs are about creating the solution to your current challenges and making sure the aesthetics, usability, intuitive nature resonates with your key audience. 4 - DO! We know even the best design means little if it is not brought to completion. We’ve built our team to have the resources necessary to get you through the Do! phase and get it done. APPROACH + PHILOSOPHY A LOOK AT EVERY ANGLE The RSP team has identified three core competencies that are central to executing a world-renowned place that will attract visitors for years to come. These competencies are led by leaders with real-world success stories and are brought together through a single process: discover, dream, design, do! The integration of these competencies ensures an informed design that puts users and economics at the forefront. HEALTH AND WELL-BEING USER EXPERIENCE: LED BY RSP DREAMBOX Heart of the City sets the stage for Rochester to become America’s City for Health. The design will be based on year-round programming that fosters health, well-being and safety. The result will be a user experience for patients, companions, visitors, employees and residents that is consistent with your vision. RSP Dreambox will facilitate this visioning phase through an engaging and innovative process that will define the ideal Heart of the City experience. INTEGRATED ECONOMIC STRATEGY: LED BY HR&A ADVISORS Top design talent will work hand-in-hand with top economic advisors. The design process will integrate all opportunities with a sound economic basis, including market prospects, revenue assessments, programming refinement, strategic partnerships and implementation planning. The end result will create a renowned destination that fuels further economic development over the long term. INFORMED URBAN DESIGN: LED BY COEN+PARTNERS We believe that building a market-driven, year-round program will inform logical design decisions. Once this base is established, design solutions will become self-evident. To ensure the success of DMC’s Heart of the City, our process fully integrates economic analysis with DMC goals, district guidelines, community and stakeholder buy-in and world-class designers to produce design solutions that are both iconic and fully achievable. IOWA CITY RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS PARK 43XCEL ENERGY PLAZA | MINNEAPOLIS, MNCrescent Cove Children’s Hospice RSP Dreambox Downtown Fountain Square HR&A Advisors Xcel Energy Plaza Coen+Partners 84 4 1 - DISCOVER Gather insights, understand our users, familiarize ourselves with context In order to move forward effectively, we will start by thoroughly digesting the excellent work that has already been done. In doing so, we plan to discover what is left to be learned to feel confident in the direction we are setting for this project. This phase of work is led by RSP Dreambox and HR&A with full collaboration from your team and ours. Together, we will get smart on all the issues and opportunities. Through meetings with the DMC and key stakeholders, our team will confirm and clarify key goals and principles. We will identify and prioritize the project audiences and define type of user experience that is desired. We’ll research each constituent, and identify potential partnerships and opportunities both within and along the urban edge of the public space. Our team will also collect data and conduct research about the area’s demographics and economics that may affect demand and usage, particularly around certain types of year-round programming. Deliverables ƒSite visit + knowledge exchange ƒVision assessment: documentation of agreed upon goals and principles, audience and scope ƒInitial project assessment: documentation of demographics and opportunities Confirm Goals and Define Design Principles Coen+Partners will lead this aspect of our work together. Our team will propose a series of simple principles to serve as the design lens through which the existing conditions and master plan are evaluated, as well as the measurement for success of new, proposed design solutions. Each of these principles has the potential to weave in and out of multiple aspects of the project. They will be workshopped, evaluated, torn apart and fully digested in collaboration with the DMC, but we have identified the following as a starting point to represent our current perspective on the project: ƒRochester-centric: design decisions are driven by the cultural, geographic, and social context of the City of Rochester ƒWe are north: solutions respond to and celebrate the regional climate ƒUniversal design: provide freedom of movement and clear, legible pedestrian circulation patterns ƒAbove and below: integrate skyways, streets, and subways together into a unified experience ƒAdaptable space: create smart, flexible space to accommodate a wide variety of active programming and calming retreat ƒResilience and regeneration: public space serves as green infrastructure making a city healthier ƒLess is more: elegance and sophistication are timeless Building off of the DMC development plan and prior community engagement work for the City of Rochester, the team will work to affirm project goals with partners and stakeholders. Potential goals may include: spurring job creation and economic development in Rochester and in areas adjacent to the Heart of the City plaza; maximizing programming for local residents, patients, and visitors; and/or finding revenue streams to offset the operating and maintenance costs of the plaza. Deliverables ƒDesign scorecard - documentation of all agreed-upon principles, diagrammed and articulated as measurable metrics for success. Evaluation of Existing Site Once goals and principles are established, RSP will lead the design team to evaluate the existing site, technical constraints, proposed concept plan, and current programming. Each area will be examined in terms of present, missing, and key possibilities for enhancement. Our team will conduct topical workshops to ensure cross-disciplinary evaluation. Deliverables ƒTeam workshop ƒIndividual team member analysis ƒRSP/Coen+Partners: existing conditions and concept plan ƒKimley-Horn: technical constraints, transportation and transit insight ƒHR&A Advisors: assess market opportunities, develop a market assessment which will estimate local and regional demand for new uses in the area and an analysis that will ensure that the programming strategy is grounded in market context, allowing for a financially feasible strategy ƒStakeholder interviews and information gathering ƒEvaluation report: documentation of findings, initial recommendations, presentations to stakeholders OUR WORKPLAN A SIMPLE PROCESS DO!DESIGNDREAMDISCOVER 85 5 Elegance and sophistication are timeless Design decisions driven by cultural, geographic, social context Solutions respond to and celebrate the regional climate Provide freedom of movement and legible circulation patterns Public space serves as green infrastructure = healthier cityIntegrate skyways, streets, and subways together into a unified experience Create smart, flexible space to accommodate a wide variety of active programming and calming retreat DESIGN PERSPECTIVES 86 6 2 - DREAM Engage community, create ownership, see possibilities Community Engagement 9.SQUARE will lead this phase of community engagement work, gathering input in diverse and disruptive ways. With all stakeholders speaking the same experiential language and success clearly articulated, we begin to dream. Our team will embark on a creative community outreach campaign, including input gathering, social media data collection, and other grass-roots efforts. We will tease out the best ideas for how the space might be used in a human-centric way, 365 days a year. We will work with the Rochester Downtown Alliance (RDA) to gather public input, test ideas, and build consensus around a wide range of uses. We will use a variety of high- and low-tech methods, both digital and analog. Deliverables ƒExperience goals + recommendation report - a documentation of all public feedback, trending themes, and ongoing efforts. Program Mapping and Analysis Coen+Partners will collaborate with HR&A and the RDA to document a detailed programming strategy for the space. We will develop spatial models that represent each potential program element. While literally laying out each proposed use in plan to identify the physical constraints of holding an event, we will begin to establish parameters, adjacencies, overlaps, and opportunities for design enhancements. all design moving forward will then be based on a meaningful demand for space. We will also work to develop a financial model for the programming strategy. It will respond to the goals established early in the process and will be founded in market feasibility. In order to ensure the financial sustainability of the programming strategy, there will be thorough considerations of the potential revenue sources available to fund activation of the space from day one. Deliverables ƒPhysical programming report: spatial analysis and technical demands for program elements and precedents of each ƒProgramming feasibility report: a presentation to the Client and stakeholders and a memorandum of key findings Our team talks, engages and asks questions. Understanding different perspectives and points of view helps to inform the process of designing a space for multi-users. From there, we’ll develop a programming strategy that responds to the goals set thus far. 87 7 3 - DESIGN Build a framework, create the ideal user experience Experience parameters, design principles, programming, and precedents all come together as our solutions emerge and begin to give shape and definition to the public realm. Merging all previously identified constraints, opportunities and ideas, Coen+Partners will work with RSP to conceptualize a series of interventions, broad strokes, and specific design strategies. The concept design will be presented to the DMC initially as a framework. Feedback will be incorporated into a concept design report, documenting a series of strategies and options and how each integrates the data and documentation of the previous phases. Deliverables ƒConcept design framework: broad strokes that begin to set a direction for enhancement ƒStakeholder presentation and workshop: hands-on feedback on the framework plan ƒConcept design report: a series of strategies and options spanning the entire study area, including rendered plans, a digital model, and 3D renderings ƒStakeholder presentation and workshop: detailed, small-group critique of the concept design and how it responds to the goals and principles previously identified Revenue Assessment Critical to the success of the Heart of the City will be a sustainable operating budget that maximizes and supports the desired programming goals and public space operations. The revenue assessment will be developed and refined in conjunction with the programming strategy. As a detailed program for the space is developed, HR&A will test and analyze potential revenue sources that may arise from the programmed activities and other sources. In order for the programming goals to be realized, the Heart of the City will need a consistent and adequate operating budget to support day-to-day activities. Working with local stakeholders to understand the range of plausible options, HR&A will examine potential operating revenue sources such as earned income, value capture tools, and contributed income strategies. Deliverables ƒRevenue assessment report: a presentation to the client/stakeholders and a memorandum of key findings. After we develop the framework with you, we’ll start refining our thoughts. We’ll examine potential operating revenue sources and determine programming goal feasibility. We’ll develop to integrate into models that represent potential program elements. 88 8 Schematic Design The design team will incorporate feedback from the DMC, incorporate technical analysis by Kimley- Horn. We will respond to critique from HR&A related to the integration of programming elements. We will perform an experience design review with RSP Dreambox. We will produce striking visual images and a full schematic design package for DMC, stakeholders, and community input. Deliverables ƒSchematic design report: plans, sections, renderings to convey design intent of proposed enhancements ƒStakeholder presentation ƒProject brief: a marketable snapshot of the programming, analysis, and design; to be adaptable for media, fundraising support, and community outreach ƒConstruction budget estimate An example: Wayzata Lake Effect Waterfront Design | The Wayzata City Council has approved to advance to the schematic design portion of this project. Moving towards implementation, the authorization to create a conservancy for the lakefront will act as the fundraising portion for the project. Rendering provided by Civitas 89 9 A completed project: Downtown Fountain Square | HR&A developed and delivered a plan to the City of Cincinnati that identified detailed strategies for activation. The firm assisted with implementation by managing a national executive search, overseeing solicitation and selection of a retail developer, and providing financial feasibility analysis and guidance for the City’s waterfront. 4 - DO! Rubber meets the road, design into action Implementation Planning Given the usage and goals for the site to become a memorable and bold downtown destination, the Heart of the City will likely require funding and management capacities over and above typical public spaces. Following conclusion of schematic design, HR&A will develop an approach for advancing this plan by developing a partnership structure as well as a phasing roadmap based on resources and desired impact, and recommending additional actions, such as the creation of a business plan, as needed. This work will be in collaboration with the RDA and DMC and will focus on: ƒDevelopment of a phasing plan for the programmatic recommendations for the Heart of the City. This will include a timeline for implementation of identified open space programs and design, as well as revenue generating opportunities, prioritizing the realization of stakeholder goals as early as possible. ƒIdentification of implementation partners that are best suited for the management of the space and programming operations, and determine the need for any new capacities or entities to support these operations where gaps in capacity may exist. ƒRecommendations for strategic relations with other organizations that can help move along the implementation of the envisioned programs. These strategic partnerships will aid in the success of the Heart of the City and its positive impact on the community. Deliverables ƒImplementation strategy presentation: presentation to DMC Corporation, CAC, the City, and other stakeholders on the phasing plan, implementation partner recommendations documentation of recommendations, phasing, time line, and key relationships. 90 10 PROPOSED SCHEDULE The team we’ve carefully curated has the experience to deliver. We are proposing a very clear and detailed schedule listing individual tasks leading up to phase completion. As your project partner, our responsibility to you is to listen, facilitate, challenge and advise, and to know when it is best to do each. One of the primary tasks that our design manager, Ben Lindau, will undertake is to ensure clarity of expectations in terms of owner approvals to ensure timely phase and project completion. We respect your time and will manage our workshops with clear agendas that outlines meeting goals and expected outcomes in order to deliver this project. We have committed our staff to be fully engaged on the project and believe we can improve upon the nine month duration. From previous experience working on projects of similar scale and complexity, we believe we can work with you to complete this project within a six month timeframe. Focused on providing DMC continuity, Kimley-Horn’s experience on the project and depth of insight into transportation may provide additional avenues to shorten timelines. Key Information for Proposed Schedule X Team + DMC X DMC Board Meeting 91 11 Oct. 2016 Nov. 2016 Dec. 2016 Jan. 2017 Feb. 2017 Mar. 2017 Apr. 2017 May 2017 Jun. 2017 1 - DISCOVER Kick off / identify stakeholders / steering committee X Site visits, data collection Vision and initial project assessment Evaluation of existing conditions Initial presentation of existing conditions X Current context and experience assessment Design principles workshop/design scorecard X DMC Board update X Experiential framework identification Knowledge exchange and research review Stakeholders interviews DMC Board update X Research findings review workshop X Evaluation of findings, report and presentation X 2 - DREAM Community engagement Stakeholder engagement workshop X X X Human centric programming analysis Experience mapping (patient, visitor, resident and employee) DMC Board update X Program mapping Financial programming strategy Physical programming Final reporting and presentation X DMC Board update X 3 - DESIGN Develop concept design framework Concept design and revenue findings workshop Concept design work and report Concept design presentation X DMC Board update X Schematic design work and report Schematic design presentation X DMC Board update X Continuous revenue assessment of design options 4 -DO! Implementation and phasing planning Identification of potential implementation partners Develop recommendations for strategic partnerships Implementation strategy development DMC Board final update X 92 12 RSP Architects + RSP Dreambox One of Minnesota’s leading and most diverse architecture and design firms, celebrating the 10- year anniversary of RSP Rochester. Coen+Partners A regionally, nationally and internationally renowned landscape architecture firm, based in Minneapolis since 1991. 9.SQUARE | Community Design Perhaps the most creative, thoughtful and inclusive community design practice in Rochester. HR&A Advisors, Inc. Strategic advisors for planning/development of parks, plazas, streetscapes, and urban spaces, approaching them as both public amenities and catalysts of economic development. ETM Associates, LLC Strategic analysis and implementation of O+M costs associated with schematic design. Kimley-Horn Focused on providing DMC continuity and depth of insight regarding transportation – a key part of the DMC plan for public space design and place-making. We work smart and fast. This team is ready to be your project partner. Our responsibility to you is to listen, facilitate, challenge and advise, and to know when it is best to do each. We have a team of individuals who have worked together on similar projects, who bring a deep familiarity with projects like this one. Perhaps more importantly, each of them is focused on finding the right solution for Rochester as it’s close to home for all of us. ORG. CHART RSP ARCHITECTS Team Lead, Architecture, Overall Coordination COEN+PARTNERS Landscape Architecture, Design, Planning KIMLEY-HORN Civil Engineering., Transit and Transportation, DMC Continuity 9.SQUARE Urban Design, Architecture, Planning CITY OF ROCHESTERDMC+ HR&A Open Space Development., Management., Economic and Operational Strategy ETM ASSOCIATES Operating Cost Estimator RSP DREAMBOX Experience Design 93 13 For 24 years, Shane has led Coen+Partners’ innovative practice, directing the design vision for each project in the studio. As a result of his creativity and disciplined design approach, his work has received numerous awards and is recognized by influential design publications throughout the world. Shane’s role on this project will be to oversee the planning and urban design direction and documentation of the work. Relevant Experience ƒWashington Square Park, Kansas City, MO ƒMarshall Riverfront Park, Minneapolis, MN ƒLavin Bernick Student Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA ƒLafayette Yards Urban Design Master Plan, St. Paul, MN ƒLuwan Mixed-Use Complex, Shanghai, China ƒKing Abdullah Financial District (KAFD) Environs, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia ƒWarroad Land Port of entry, Warroad, MN ƒMinneapolis Central Library, Minneapolis, MN Shane Coen FASLA Founder/Principal Coen+Partners Jon Buggy AIA, NCARB Project Executive RSP Architects For 25+ years Jon has been an innovator in design and architecture for healthcare, recognized for excellence in client service and sought-after for leading complex and multi- faceted projects. As the managing principal of RSP’s Rochester office & RSP’s Health and Life Sciences Studio, Jon is eager to bring his design passion and facilitation skills to make this DMC opportunity as successful as possible. Relevant Experience ƒCrescent Cove Children’s Hospice, Chaska, MN ƒTRIA Orthopedic Center, Park Nicollet Health Services (PNHS), Woodbury, MN ƒSt. Cloud State University Student Health and Wellness Center, St. Cloud, MN ƒWinona Health, Outpatient Expansion, Winona, MN ƒRegions Hospital 2009 Expansion, St. Paul, MN* ƒPark Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, MN* »Heart and Vascular Center »Campus Master Plans *Projects completed while associated with a different firm. RESUMES MEET OUR TEAM Candace has devoted her 30-year career to crafting sustainable urban redevelopment strategies for cities across North America. Her specific areas of expertise include ensuring the long-term viability of urban open spaces, leading organizational planning for non-profits and institutions, and supporting master planning for large-scale revitalizations. Candace has ample experience advising open space projects in Minnesota, including the revitalization of the Lake Minnetonka waterfront, Wayzata; programming and development advisory for the Minneapolis waterfront; and the Great River Park master plan implementation in St. Paul. Relevant Experience ƒBusiness Plan for the Green Minneapolis Conservancy, Minneapolis, MN ƒThe Commons Park, Downtown East Minneapolis, MN ƒWayzata Lake Effect Waterfront Design, Wayzata, MN ƒProgramming & Development Advisory, Minneapolis Waterworks Site, Minneapolis, MN ƒGreat River Park Master Plan Implementation, St. Paul, MN ƒRevitalization of Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN Candace Damon Vice Chairman HR&A Advisors 94 14 Rochester is Adam’s home. While he might be considered a “transplant” or a “trailing spouse,” Adam and his wife made a conscious decision to stay in Rochester and raise a family. He created 9.SQUARE | Community Design as a natural outgrowth of his work leading small communities in Minnesota and Rochester’s urban neighborhoods through long range planning activities. Adam’s employment and volunteering at various organizations over his 11 years in Rochester has given him exposure to a wide range of fields and disciplines including architecture, urban planning, community engagement, community development, affordable housing development, urban design, and economic development. Relevant Experience ƒGrand Rounds Brewpub, Rochester, MN ƒConley-Maass-Downs Building Rehabilitation, Rochester, MN ƒLimb Lab, Rochester, MN ƒreImagine Graham Park, Rochester, MN ƒImagine Process, Rochester Area Foundation, Rochester, MN ƒCharette Happens, Rochester, MN ƒMayo Clinic Business Accelerator Phase II, Rochester, MN ƒResoundant, Rochester, MN ƒKutzky Market & Forager Brewery, Rochester, MN Adam Ferrari AIA Founder & Principal 9.SQUARE | Community Design Robin has 15 years of wide-ranging experience in managing landscape architecture, planning, architecture, and real estate development projects. His expertise lies in the integration of disparate concepts, ideas and constraints into a clear goal and direction. His experience managing projects from concept through construction informs his design decisions, planning focus and implementation of innovative detailing. Relevant Experience ƒWashington Square Park, Kansas City, MO ƒLifeSource Corporate Campus, Minneapolis, MN ƒHigher Ground Homeless Shelter, St. Paul, MN ƒKing Abdullah Financial District (KAFD) Environs, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia ƒNicollet Mall Redesign, Minneapolis, MN ƒEast 9th Streetscape Design, Lawrence, KS ƒPompano Beach Civic Complex, Pompano Beach, FL Robin Ganser ASLA Principal-in-Charge Coen+Partners Derek McCallum brings a worldly perspective to the role of Design Lead. His eclectic background and interests helps him dream up everything from elegant skyscrapers to vibrant stories to intricate guitar riffs. Derek leads design thinking at RSP. He pushes us all to elevate our client’s vision, expand the boundaries, and believe design can change the world. With 25 years of architectural experience, Derek’s award-winning work includes both national and international collaborations on entertainment districts and large placemaking opportunities. Relevant Experience ƒOPTUM Corporate Headquarters, Eden Prairie, MN ƒOPTUM Lab, Cambridge, MA ƒLifeSource Headquarters, Minneapolis, MN ƒOSI Headquarters, Medina, MN ƒColoplast, Inc, North American Headquarters, Minneapolis, MN ƒMayo Clinic Square, Minneapolis, MN ƒVestfield Towers, Johor Bahru District, Malaysia ƒTianjin Urban Design Company, Xiao Bai Lou Plaza ƒTianjin Urban Design Company, Tian Cheng Plaza Hotel Derek McCallum AIA, LEED AP Design Principal RSP Architects 95 15 Kate brings over 15 years of experience advising on master plan and open space creation, crafting public- private partnerships, and engaging in public participation in order to create lively and sustainable downtowns and public spaces. Relevant experience to the Heart of the City design includes working with a team to create the Downtown Raleigh Experience Plan; advising on programming, funding, and governance for Gateway Park in Oakland, California; and providing redevelopment planning for Philadelphia’s central waterfront to drive waterfront access and economic activity. Relevant Experience ƒDowntown Experience Plan, Raleigh, NC ƒWaterfront Open Space Management, Seattle, WA ƒReal Estate Advisory for the Menil Collection, Houston, TX ƒLOVE Park Open Space Strategy, Philadelphia, PA ƒProgramming, Funding & Governance Advisory, Oakland, CA ƒResearch Triangle Park Economic and Planning Advisor ƒRedevelopment Planning for the Central Waterfront, Philadelphia, PA Kate Collignon Managing Partner HR&A Advisors As an experience designer, consultant, and public arts convener, Teri has led RSP Dreambox, a human-centered experience design studio within RSP. She has led research and created experiences for a broad range of clients, ranging from healthcare to corporate to community based experiences, most recently with the focus of well-being. Teri’s holistic perspective always brings our end user’s and stakeholder’s perspectives into the conversation, and into sharp focus, with an intent to design healing places, connections and conversations. Relevant Experience ƒCrescent Cove Children’s Hospice, Chaska, MN ƒHennepin County Medical Center Patient Experience, Minneapolis, MN ƒDoylestown Hospital, emergency department patient / family experience design, Doylestown, PA ƒLifeSource Corporate Headquarters, Minneapolis, MN ƒDakota County Mississippi River Trail Experience Design Dakota County, MN ƒEcolab Customer Experience Center, Monheim Germany ƒDowntown Experience Committee Member Minneapolis, MN ƒShingle Creek Connection, Brooklyn Park, MN ƒTamarack Nature Center: Discovery Hollow, St. Paul, MN Teri Kwant ASLA, SEGD Experience Designer RSP Architects Ben is a dedicated and innovative project architect with more than 19 years of experience. He will be your day to day contact as he manages the design process and coordinates all consultants. His expertise ranges from master planning to full design services for a variety of project types, including hospitals, health centers, and research facilities. Recently, Ben has led design coordination efforts Mayo Clinic, Allina Health Systems and the US Bank Stadium in downtown Minneapolis. Relevant Experience ƒUS Bank Stadium, Minneapolis, MN* ƒMayo Clinic Administrative Campus Master Plan, Rochester, MN* ƒMayo Clinic, Block 12 Research Master Plan,Rochester, MN* ƒSanford Health, New Hospital, Fargo, ND* ƒSamsung Medical Center, Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea* ƒSidra Medical and Research Center, Qatar* ƒCity Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates* ƒChildren’s Hospitals and Clinics, Minneapolis Campus Expansion, Minneapolis, MN* ƒCommunity Medical Center, OB Expansion/Renovation, Missoula, MT* *Projects completed while associated with a different firm Ben Lindau AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+c Design Manager / Client Contact RSP Architects 96 16 As a native Minnesotan, with extensive familial roots in Rochester, Erin’s work has been geographically focused, supporting economic development and the creation of new open spaces and transit-oriented development throughout the Twin Cities region. As a director at the firm, she has been able to leverage her experience with urban planning, economic analysis, and real estate to support public and private sector clients. Specifically, she has developed programming and revenue generation strategies for open spaces in both Wayzata and Minneapolis. Relevant Experience ƒWayzata Lake Effect Waterfront Design, Wayzata, MN ƒWest Broadway Transit Study, Minneapolis, MN ƒThe Commons Park, Downtown East Minneapolis, MN ƒBusiness Plan for the Green Minneapolis Conservancy, Minneapolis, MN ƒIncentivizing Mixed-Use Development in East Downtown Minneapolis, MN Erin Lonoff Director HR&A Advisors Dan has over 24 years of experience providing engineering consulting services for a variety of state, municipal, agency, and private clients. Dan’s areas of specialty include transportation, access management, public involvement, utility infrastructure, and stormwater management. Dan led the 2013 Infrastructure Master Plan that supported the creation of the Destination Medical Center (DMC) legislation. Dan was the project manager for the infrastructure component of the DMC Development Plan. In that role, Dan assembled all of the infrastructure projects and transportation projects into a GIS database and actively participated in creating the implementation plan. In addition, Dan is leading the utility portion of the Rochester Comprehensive Plan. Relevant Experience ƒGreenhaven Golf Course Entry and TH 10 Interchange Landscape, Anoka, MN ƒCedar Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, Minneapolis, MN ƒLevee Road and River Trail, Red Wing, MN ƒDan Patch River Crossing Scoping Study, Savage, MN ƒHammes Company, Rochester Destination Medical Center (DMC) Infrastructure Master Plan, Rochester, MN ƒMinnesota DOT, TH 212/County Road (CR) 51 Intersection Improvements, Bongards, MN Dan Coyle PE Project Manager Kimley-Horn Tim Marshall, principal and owner of ETM Associates, has been involved with public space management for 30 years, providing professional public space solutions, strategies and developmental guidance. His extensive hands-on experience in the field has given him an intimate knowledge of park operations and management, and a robust approach to problem solving, funding and public/private partnerships. With a keen awareness that more is continually asked to be done with fewer resources, his consulting work often focuses on what he terms “gap analysis”. He recognizes that there is nearly always a gap between the reality of existing resource levels and the total resources needed for optimum delivery of services within public space management, and his work articulates effective ways in which that gap can be bridged. Relevant Experience ƒGreening Downtown Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN ƒDowntown East Commons; Minneapolis, MN ƒLake Calhoun-Harriet; Minneapolis, MN ƒRiverFirst; Minneapolis, MN ƒGrand Junction; Westfield, IN ƒStory Mills; Bozeman, MT ƒHance Park; Phoenix, AZ ƒDiscovery Green; Houston, TX Tim Marshall ASLA Cost Estimator ETM Associates 97 17 Rendering provided by RYAN Companies Members of our team have worked on various components of this Minneapolis development creating economical, fiscal and social benefits to the region. HR&A + ETM: Commons Park; Ben Lindau: US Bank Stadium, while employed at another firm; RSP: Wells Fargo Downtown East Towers.98 18 TOTAL FEE Project Phase 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $164,120 2 - Dream: Concept Design $144,220 3 - Design: Schematic Design $208,960 4 - Do: Implementation Planning $60,140 Subtotal $577,440 Reimbursable Expenses $21,500 TOTAL $598,940 We believe that the best project results are achieved by using the best project processes. Our simple process framework illustrates the following: ƒGrand total fee ƒFee information by firm ƒFee by phase distribution ƒResponsibility matrix indicating primary lead contributor and participation by firm throughout the project lifecycle We believe we have planned for an adequate number of project meetings with your team to ensure project progression and arriving at consensus at the end of each task and phase. Our local presence enables us to accommodate your busy schedule and accommodate additional meetings if the need arises. Reimbursable expenses include mailing, printing, travel and lodging costs. 99 19 FEE BREAKDOWN FEE BY FIRM 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $5,000 2 - Dream: Concept Design $8,000 3 - Design: Schematic Design 4 - Do: Implementation Planning Subtotal $13,000 Reimbursable Expenses TOTAL $13,000 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $22,000 2 - Dream: Concept Design $33,000 3 - Design: Schematic Design $45,000 4 - Do: Implementation Planning $20,000 Subtotal $120,000 Reimbursable Expenses $6,000 TOTAL $126,000 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $37,440 2 - Dream: Concept Design 3 - Design: Schematic Design $36,940 4 - Do: Implementation Planning Subtotal $74,380 Reimbursable Expenses $5,000 TOTAL $79,380 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $38,680 2 - Dream: Concept Design $60,300 3 - Design: Schematic Design $113,020 4 - Do: Implementation Planning $8,140 Subtotal $220,140 Reimbursable Expenses $5,000 TOTAL $225,140 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $23,000 2 - Dream: Concept Design $11,920 3 - Design: Schematic Design 4 - Do: Implementation Planning Subtotal $34,920 Reimbursable Expenses $500 TOTAL $35,420 1 - Discover: Vision and Context $38,000 2 - Dream: Concept Design $31,000 3 - Design: Schematic Design $14,000 4 - Do: Implementation Planning $32,000 Subtotal $115,000 Reimbursable Expenses $5,000 TOTAL $120,000 RSP Architects Coen+Partners HR&A Advisors - ETM Associates RSP Dreambox Kimley-Horn 9.SQUARE 100 20 FEE BREAKDOWN FEE BY TASK PROJECT TASK Gathering insights, understanding our users, familiarizing ourselves with context Team site visit and kickoff O X X X X X Knowledge exchange + research review O X X X X X Current context + experience assessment X X X X O Identify key stakeholders / steering team O X X Experiential framework X O Vision and initial project assessment O X X X X X Confirm Heart of the City goals Design principles workshop X O X X X Design scorecard X O X X X Evaluation of existing conditions Team workshop Existing conditions analysis Master plan analysis Technical analysis Stakeholder interview O X X X X X Evaluation report and presentation O X X X X X 1 - DISCOVER TOTAL $164,120 RS P A r c h i t e c t s Co e n + P a r t n e r s Ki m l e y - H o r n HR & A A d v i s o r s + E T M 9. S Q U A R E RS P D r e a m b o x Key ‘0’ denotes team lead ‘ X’ denotes participation Engaging community / creating ownership Human centric programming analysis X X O X Experience mapping Patient, companion, visitor, employee and resident experience-driven analysis X X X O Program mapping Develop a financially sustainable programming strategy X X 0 P hysical programming analysis & refinement X 0 0 0 Combined final report / path for success and presentation O X X 2 - DREAM TOTAL $144,220 PROJECT TASK RS P A r c h i t e c t s Co e n + P a r t n e r s Ki m l e y - H o r n HR & A A d v i s o r s + E T M 9. S Q U A R E RS P D r e a m b o x 1 - DISCOVER 2 - DREAM 101 21 PROJECT TASK (CONTINUED) Implementation planning Phasing plan for programmatic recommendations X X X O Identification of implementation partners X O Recommendations for strategic partnerships X 0 Implementation strategy presentation X X X 0 4 - DO! TOTAL $60,140 RS P A r c h i t e c t s Co e n + P a r t n e r s Ki m l e y - H o r n HR & A A d v i s o r s + E T M 9. S Q U A R E RS P D r e a m b o x PROJECT TASK RS P A r c h i t e c t s Co e n + P a r t n e r s Ki m l e y - H o r n HR & A A d v i s o r s + E T M 9. S Q U A R E RS P D r e a m b o x Concept design Concept design framework X O X Stakeholder design and revenue findings workshop X O Concept design report X O Stakeholder presentation and workshop X O Revenue assessment Test potential revenue sources including: contributed income, earned income, value capture and public contribution X O Schematic design Schematic design report X O X X Stakeholder presentation X O X Project brief O X X X 3 - DESIGN TOTAL $208,960 3 - DESIGN 4 - DO! 102 22 WASHINGTON SQUARE PARK Coen+Partners and HR&A Advisors collaborating with the Kansas City Design Center Client Reference: Mark McHenry mark.mchenry@kcmo.org 816.513.7503 WAYZATA LAKE EFFECT WATERFRONT DESIGN HR&A Advisors, Inc., collaborating with Civitas on behalf of the City of Wayzata Client Reference: Mary deLaittre Project Manager, Minneapolis Riverfront Development Initiative mary@minneapolisriverfrontdevelopmentinitiative.com 612.822.3403 LIFESOURCE Coen+Partners + RSP Architects Client Reference: Peter D. Farstad LifeSource, Chief Administrative Officer 2225 West River Road North Minneapolis, MN 55411 612.800.6325 OUR REFERENCES CONNECT WITH OUR CLIENTS 103 23 CENTRAL STATION ST. MARY PLACE DISCOVERY SQUARE DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT HEART OF THE CITY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COMMITTED TO GROWTH UMR & RECREATION “I BELIEVE THAT THE HEART OF THE CITY WORK IS ESSENTIAL TO EXPANDING CURRENT EFFORTS FOR A VIBRANT AND ENGAGED ROCHESTER EPICENTER. AS A DOWNTOWN RESIDENT, I CARE ABOUT HOW THE CITY GROWS AND DEVELOPS. THIS IS AN EXCITING TIME FOR ROCHESTER. “ Jeanine Gangeness, Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs at Winona State University 104 24 COMPLETED IN THE GREATER ROCHESTER AREA RSP PROJECTS690+ 105 25 RED WING 37 Projects ROCHESTER OFFICE 283 Projects WINONA 21 Projects AUSTIN 37 Projects NORTHFIELD 14 Projects FARIBAULT 108 Projects OWATONNA 2 Projects ALBERT LEA 3 Projects ROCHESTER + SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA PRESENCE RSP, through a wide range of projects and initiatives, has built deep connections to the Rochester community. We work with business leaders, community stakeholders and City officials on a daily basis. We are engaged in the community’s desire to harness growth that is economically and environmentally sustainable. We also understand the complexity and impact of the DMC initiative — the goals are lofty, the stakes are high, and the stakeholders vary dramatically. RSP has carefully curated this team and aligned ourselves with people who are excited to see growth, expansion and support in this area. Local Practice RSP’s Rochester office was founded 10 years ago to offer exceptional design services in southeastern Minnesota. We are currently expanding our office space to accommodate the growth and growing diversity of our business. RSP’s Rochester and Minneapolis offices work collaboratively on projects of all types on a daily basis — providing the convenience of local service, knowledge of local processes and internationally recognized talent. Together, we work better, faster, and smarter. Municipal Expertise RSP has significant experience and solid relationships with the City of Rochester and Olmsted County departments that participate in the planning, design and construction processes within Rochester. We have a deep understanding of their requirements and processes including the newly created Destination Medical Center Design Guidelines. RSP also enjoys excellent relationships with leadership of the DMC Corporation, DMC EDA and Mayo Clinic’s Facilities team. Mayo Clinic/Mayo Clinic Health System Partner RSP has been working with the Mayo Clinic in Rochester and the regional health system for the past eighteen years. In the past 10 years alone, we’ve delivered over 320 projects, of various sizes and project types, but always with quality results. We have served as Mayo brand stewards, facility and master planners integrating with Mayo facilities staff and completing projects, on time, and within budget. RSP has worked in 16 buildings on the Mayo Downtown Campus and 10 others throughout the city of Rochester. 106 B. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION RESOLUTION NO. -2016 Approving the Recommendation to Engage RSP Architects to Serve as the Public Space Design Firm for the Heart of the City BACKGROUND RECITALS A. The City of Rochester (“the City”) and the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency (“DMC EDA”) issued a request for qualifications (“RFQ”) for the public space design of the Heart of the City, a Destination Medical Center sub-district, on February 5, 2016, to which eleven firms responded. B. The City appointed the Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee (“the Committee”) on April 4, 2016. All meetings of the Committee were open to the public. On April 12, 2016, the Committee reviewed the qualifications of the eleven firms that responded to the RFQ, and recommended that six firms be invited to submit public space design proposals. Requests for proposal were issued by the City and DMC EDA on June 3, 2016, and all six firms responded. C. On July 25, 2016, a sub-committee of the Committee reviewed all six proposals, and recommended that three proposals, consisting of RSP Architects, HGA Architects, and Sasaki Associates, be advanced to the full Committee for review and interviews. D. The three finalist teams presented their proposals to the Committee on August 15, 2016. The Committee now recommends RSP Architects and seeks the approval of the Destination Medical Center Corporation and the City of Rochester, for final negotiation of the terms and conditions of engagement and funding determination. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Destination Medical Center Corporation Board of Directors, that the Board accepts the recommendation of the Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee and approves RSP Architects as the design team for public space in the Heart of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board requests regular updates from the design team as it undertakes its work. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board hereby transmits this Resolution to the City of Rochester and requests its consideration and approval of RSP Architects and completion of the negotiations for the terms and conditions of engagement. 851218.DOCX 107 Planning Update: Saint Marys Place/Second Street Infrastructure To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: August 19, 2016 Background: The public design process initiated in the Saint Marys Place subdistrict continues to move forward. In late June, members of the Saint Marys Place working group—including property owners, neighborhood association leaders, developers, as wells as City, DMC EDA, and Mayo Clinic staff—participated in a site visit to Minneapolis and Saint Paul. The site visit, which focused on transit-oriented development and public spaces along the Green Line light rail transit, stretched from Rice Park and the Saint Paul RiverCentre to Nicollet Mall. The group also visited Latitude 45, an Alatus, LLC development similar to the proposed Alatus-Pompeian project west of Mayo Clinic Hospital, Saint Marys campus. Next Steps: DMC EDA, City of Rochester, and Metropolitan Design Center staff have been planning the details of a 2-3 week “design sprint” scheduled to begin in late September. 108 ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Streets • Sidewalks • Subways, Skyways • Parking • Etc. Final Plan • PED Connect • Neighborhood Transition • Street & Transit • Parking •• Cost Est. • Schedule 2-4 Alternatives Draft Plan REPORT REPORT F o r m t he Basis ILLUSTRATIONS 45 DAYS 14 DAYS 30 DAYS Establish Work Group Review Past Plans Establish Principles 100 Year Perspective Other City of Rochester - Richard Freese DMC EDA - Patrick Seeb Evaluate & Rank Key Person Interview Best Practice Visits Needs Analysis Residents Patients Visitors Etc. Site Analysis Project Integration Meeting Check in Meeting(s)Select CC AdoptID Person in Charge Refine & Adapt Work Plan DATA GATHERING & ANALYSIS DESIGN SPRINT ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC REALM PLAN St. Marys Place | 2nd Street Public Realm Design Process May 17, 2016 | Updated April 21, 2016 110 St. Marys Place | 2nd Street Public Realm Design Process - Design Sprint Alternatives August 11, 2016 DRAFT Stakeholder Groups: Group A: Design for the patient/visitor/employee experience Mayo (2 People), Neighborhood (2 People), Business (2 People), City (2 People) Group B: Design for the local business/developers experience Mayo (2 People), Neighborhood (2 People), Business (2 People), City (2 People) Group C: Design for the neighborhood/livability experience Mayo (2 People), Neighborhood (2 People), Business (2 People), City (2 People) Design Professionals: Meeting Facilitators MDC, Saint Paul Riverfront Corp., SEH Urban Designer/Landscape Architects MDC, Saint Paul Riverfront Corp., SEH Graphic Visualization Support MDC, SEH Engineers City, Stantec September Su M Tu W Th F Sa 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October Su M Tu W Th F Sa 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2223 24 25 26 27 28 2930 31 Week 1: September 26-30 Week 2: October 12-19October 3-11 8:00 12:00 5:00 8:00 M Tu W Th F 8:00 12:00 5:00 8:00 W Th F Sa M Tu W Gr o u p A De s i g n I n p u t De s i g n C o n c e p t A De s i g n I n p u t De s i g n I n p u t De s i g n C o n c e p t B De s i g n C o n c e p t A , B , & C D e s i g n C o n c e p t C Gr o u p B De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s Pr o t o t y p e A Pr o t o t y p e B Pr o t o t y p e C De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s Pr o t o t y p e A Pr o t o t y p e B Pr o t o t y p e C Pr o t o t y p e A Pr o t o t y p e B Pr o t o t y p e C De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s Fi n a l C o n c e p t We e k 2 K i c k - O Gr o u p C We e k 1 K i c k - O Prepare For Protoypes Finalize 3 Concepts Ta k e D o w n A Pu b l i c O p e n H o u s e Pu b l i c O p e n H o u s e St a k e h o l d e r s / D e s i g n Co n c e p t A O b s e r v a t i o n S e t u p C o n c e p t A Ta k e D o w n B C o n c e p t B O b s e r v a t i o n S e t u p C o n c e p t B Ta k e D o w n C C o n c e p t C O b s e r v a t i o n S e t u p C o n c e p t C An a l y z e P r o t o t y p i n g A n a l y z e P r o t o t y p i n g Re n e F i n a l C o n c e p t R e n e F i n a l C o n c e p t Re n e F i n a l C o n c e p t De s i g n P r o f e s s i o n a l s Re n e F i n a l C o n c e p t 110 DMC A Global Destination for Health & Healing July 2016 Monthly Report Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Ju l y 20 1 6 111 Dear Board Members, On behalf of the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency (DMC EDA), I am pleased to provide you with the DMC EDA July 2016 monthly report. July marked an important month for DMC and demonstrated our progress through collaborations with key stakeholder groups in the DMC District. We continue to field requests from developers as evidenced by our participation in concept/development meetings related to five specific development initiatives. Our efforts this month have been focused on the implementation phase of the DMC Development Plan, particularly in Heart of the City, Discovery Square and St. Marys Place sub-districts.  In the Heart of the City RFP process, we selected three design team firms for the public realm in Heart of the City, and a final recommendation will be presented in mid-August.  Strategic planning for the full Discovery Square sub district continues to move forward. Mayo Clinic will be selecting a strategic real estate developer in the coming weeks.  We hosted a best practice tour with civic leaders and a workgroup from St. Marys Place sub-district to learn about strategies for streetscapes, transit and pedestrian connections – all very important considerations for the St. Marys Place sub-district development plans. Our partnerships continue to grow in the community as evidenced by the PlaceMakers| Prototyping initiative – a joint business strategy of the DMC, the Rochester Downtown Alliance and the Rochester Art Center – which offers the public a glimpse into the many different ways a public space can be transformed. The PlaceMakers| Prototyping Festival in September will bring the community together to help create concepts on building America’s City for Health by showcasing potential solutions around health and the built environment. It is a pleasure to provide you these monthly updates. Please contact me if you have questions on this report. I appreciate your support and will continue to stay engaged with you. Sincerely, Lisa Clarke Letter from Lisa Clarke 112 Page: 1-3 4-5 6 7-10 Progress Report Communications Review Major Tasks for next 60 Days August/September 2016 Financials July 2016 113 Economic Development  Near completion of data collection phase for the St. Marys Place public realm planning sessions to prepare for future private development proposals. Now scheduling the next phase called the design sprint;  Led “best practices” site visit to Twin Cities, involving 20 Rochester civic leaders, to look at strategies for streetscapes, transit, pedestrian connections, etc;  Participated in six project concept/development meetings related to five separate development initiatives to assist developers in meeting DMC development objectives;  Provided in-depth review and hands-on guidance to three major development projects in an attempt to match developers’ interests/needs with DMC goals and objectives;  Received and reviewed Heart of the City public space design proposals from six finalist firms. Met with Community Advisory Committee subcommittee to select three firms for interviews;  Participated with the city of Rochester in presenting proposed design standards for DMC District to key constituent audiences;  Participated in policy discussions regarding strategies for Uber (ride sharing) and Airbnb (hospitality options);  Led the urban prototyping business strategy, in collaboration with Rochester Downtown Alliance and Rochester Art Center. Page 1 July 2016 Progress Report (1 of 3) 114 Finance  EDA Staff continued to develop the strategic goals for the 2017 workplan, and the budget that will support the workplan.  DMCC and EDA Board members were identified to work with EDA Staff on preparing and reviewing the 2017 workplan and budget. Operations  EDA Staff continued to work with Wilder Research to populate and visualize the DMC metrics dashboard.  EDA Staff continued to work with the City of Rochester and the City's transportation program manager (SRF) on DMC transportation issues and studies.  EDA Staff continued to work with the McKnight Foundation and the Center for energy and Environment ("CEE") on DMC Energy and sustainability issues. Page 2 July 2016 Progress Report (2 of 3) 115 Communications and Marketing  Held discussions on technology programs including a way-finding app for Rochester;  Provided DMC update on KROC radio;  Posted blogs garnering social engagement on topics including patient experience, prototyping, and Supplier Diversity Summit. Outreach and Community Engagement  Participated in a regional economic development tour hosted by CEDA;  Participated in a workshop hosted by DEED on market rate housing programs;  Collaborated with the Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce, Mayo Clinic, the Diversity Council, the City of Rochester on a Supplier Diversity Summit and Business Expo to be held on August 3;  Provided DMC update to Minnesota legislators and attended statewide policy tour with Minnesota Chamber of Commerce at IBM;  Attended Rochester Works! meeting with Workforce Development and higher education representatives. Discovery Square & Experience Accreditation  Collaborated with Mayo Clinic to finalize Discovery Square strategy and announcement strategy for final phase of the selection process of a real estate development firm (selection expected by end of August)  Continued efforts to pitch the Discovery Square announcement to various trade and industry publications.  Met with Mayo Clinic and Rochester Convention and Visitors Bureau on enhancing Patient Experience strategies in support of the Experience Accreditation program strategy Membership continues to increase.  Posted blogs and garnered social media attention on the newest members of the Experience Accreditation program (So far, nine businesses are participating in the Experience Accreditation program, including four hotels). Page 3 July 2016 Progress Report (3 of 3) 116 July Media Results:  Over 45 media stories – some focused on Broadway at Center project and the DMC best practice tour to St. Paul.  In July, the DMC website was visited 4,243 times with 11,107 page views. July Social Media Results: Key DMC moments amplified social engagement:  Thursday, June 30th through Monday, July 4th: Voting for PlaceMakers/ Prototyping Festival.  Thursday, July 7th: PlaceMaker participants announced at Thursdays on First.  Tuesday, July 19th: Meet the Makers at the Rochester Art Center.  Friday, July 29th: Patrick Seeb and Lisa Clarke took a group of local leaders to St. Paul to learn about placemaking and public transit. July 2016: B l Blog: Blog activity on DMC website continues to increase. Duration time on blog continues to be above average (2:07), an indication of quality engagement and topics relative to the reader. Most popular blog posts by reading duration, top ten: Page 4 July 2016 Media Review 117 Twitter: Facebook: Twitter followers continue to increase, and are now at 2,939 total Twitter followers. 4,175 Likes with a 2.6% Engagement Rate (Industry average of 2% to 3% Engagement Rate (ER). Most popular Facebook post: Competitive Analysis: Page 5 Media Review 118 • Conduct planning session to advance public realm/public infrastructure strategy for St. Marys Place; • Finalize draft set of metrics to measure progress of DMC initiative, including methodology, data sources, and presentation plan; • Recommend design team for Heart of the City public space design to DMCC and city of Rochester; • Participate with Mayo Clinic’s Discovery Square process to ensure its consistency with the DMC development plan; • Participate as steering committee member for Chateau Theater reuse study; • Begin strategy and planning for BIO 2017, in collaboration with DEED, Medical Alley, RAEDI, Mayo Ventures, and others to ensure a strong Minnesota presence; • Pro-actively engage developer community to advance development opportunities; • Host and participate in public events to grow community understanding and input for forthcoming changes in Rochester; • Activate the marketing strategy to realize the DMC Vision; • Advance prototyping business initiative in partnership with Rochester Downtown Alliance, Rochester Art Center, and City of Rochester; • Provide strategic support for startup and entrepreneur community; • Continue to develop DMC energy and sustainability planning in collaborating with the energy technical committee, while adding technical expertise with the McKnight grant funding. • Participate in discussion on integration of DMC design guidelines for accessibility considerations in public spaces and projects. Major Tasks for Next 60 Days 119 Master Application for Payment Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Application Details Statement of Project Application Number: July 2016 Original 2016 Budget $ 2,988,188.00 Application Date: 8/1/2016 Current 2016 Budget $ 2,988,188.00 Period From: 7/1/2016 Period To: Sources of Funds: 7/31/2016 Total completed to date via MAP process Retainage to Date Total completed via MAP process less retainage $ 576,753.23 $ - $ 576,753.23 City Contribution $ 23,990.56 Less previous Map requests $ 552,762.67 - - - Total Sources $ - $ - $ - $ 23,990.56 Current MAP Request Amount Due 2016 operational expenses funded to date Total 2016 City Contribution $ 23,990.56 $ 367,881.38 $ 944,634.61 % of 2016 Budget 31.6% Uses of Funds: EDA Staff Costs $ EDA Operational Costs $ Econ Dev Outreach & Support $ Professional Services $ Miscellaneous Costs $ Total Uses $ - 2,832.00 - 21,158.56 - 23,990.56 Approvals EDA: Date DMCC: Date MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials 120 Master Application for Payment Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency DMC EDA P&L Description Vendor Contract # Previous Billings Current Work in Place Total Work to Date EDA Staff Costs $ 1,803.15 $ - $ 1,803.15 Payroll Smart-Fill NA $ 1,803.15 $ - $ 1,803.15 EDA Operational Costs $ 20,711.62 $ 2 ,832.00 $ 23,543.62 Website, Drafting, Hosting Brandhoot 4043 $ 19,260.00 $ 2,832.00 $ 22,092.00 Website, Drafting, Hosting Brandhoot NA $ 210.00 $ - $ 210.00 IT Hardware & Support Data Smart 4044 $ 1,241.62 $ - $ 1,241.62 Econ Dev Outreach & Support $ 21,655.00 $ - $ 21,655.00 Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships DEED NA $ 5,000.00 $ - $ 5,000.00 Outreach, Print & Collateral Fuse Digital 4042 $ 2,025.00 $ - $ 2,025.00 Outreach, Print & Collateral Journal Communications NA $ 8,755.00 $ - $ 8,755.00 Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Exec NA $ 450.00 $ - $ 450.00 Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships RCTC NA $ 600.00 $ - $ 600.00 Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce NA $ 3,950.00 $ - $ 3,950.00 Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Rochester Downtown Alliance NA $ 750.00 $ - $ 750.00 Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Rochester Trolley & Tour Company NA $ 125.00 $ - $ 125.00 Professional Services $ 435,672.80 $ 21 ,158.56 $ 456,831.36 Other Contracting Services Brandhoot 4016 $ 4,367.52 $ - $ 4,367.52 Other Contracting Services Catharine Jones 4058 $ 5,235.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 7,185.00 Marketing Communications & Advertising Clarity Coverdale Fury (CCF) 4052 $ 100,000.00 $ 6,755.00 $ 106,755.00 Marketing Communications & Advertising Clarity Coverdale Fury (CCF) NA $ 3,700.00 $ - $ 3,700.00 Financial Reporting Services CliftonLarsonAllen NA $ 2,950.00 $ - $ 2,950.00 Financial Reporting Services Lund Tax & Accounting NA $ 720.00 $ - $ 720.00 Other Contracting Services Deluxe NA $ 643.02 $ - $ 643.02 Other Contracting Services EJ Photography NA $ 350.00 $ - $ 350.00 Other Contracting Services Gina Osmond NA $ 1,312.50 $ - $ 1,312.50 Other Contracting Services Himle Rapp 4056 $ 97,878.00 $ - $ 97,878.00 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials Master Application For Payment Detail: July 2016 8/1/2016 121 Master Application for Payment Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Master Application For Payment Detail: July 2016 8/1/2016 Other Contracting Services Imagebridge Design NA $ 23,100.00 $ 360.00 $ 23,460.00 Other Contracting Services Inspire MN, LLC 4041 $ 43,277.50 $ 7,157.50 $ 50,435.00 Other Contracting Services Majestic Tents & Events NA $ 1,230.31 $ 308.63 $ 1,538.94 Other Contracting Services MarketaBelle 4055 $ 20,328.00 $ - $ 20,328.00 Other Contracting Services Mayo Clinic NA $ - $ 3,877.43 $ 3,877.43 Other Contracting Services Medical Alley NA $ 1,575.00 $ - $ 1,575.00 Other Contracting Services Michael Best NA $ 200.00 $ - $ 200.00 Other Contracting Services Momentum NA $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 Other Contracting Services Nelsen BioMedical 4057 $ 53,713.95 $ - $ 53,713.95 Other Contracting Services Nelson Nygaard NA $ 1,235.00 $ - $ 1,235.00 Other Contracting Services Our City NA $ 16,260.00 $ - $ 16,260.00 Other Contracting Services St Paul River Front Corporation NA $ 4,997.00 $ 750.00 $ 5,747.00 Other Contracting Services Terra Eclipse, Inc. NA $ 21,600.00 $ - $ 21,600.00 Other Contracting Services Wilder Research 4054 $ 16,500.00 $ - $ 16,500.00 Other Contracting Services University of Minnesota 4053 $ 12,500.00 $ - $ 12,500.00 Miscellaneous Costs $ 72,920.10 $ - $ 72,920.10 Insurance & Taxes Aon Risk Services $ 72,920.10 $ - $ 72,920.10 Project Total $ 552,762.67 $ 23,990.56 $ 576,753.23 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials 122 Master Application for Payment Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Vendor Name Description Contract # Invoice # Invoice Date Invoice Amount Brandhoot Website Maintenance Agreement 4043 1452 7/1/2016 $ 2,832.00 Catharine Jones Communications Support (July) 4058 5 7/31/2016 $ 1,950.00 Clarity Coverdale Fury Project Order #2 4052 PO #02 7/11/2016 $ 6,755.00 Image Bridge Design Support 4061 16095 8/1/2016 $ 360.00 Inspire MN Communications Support (July) 4041 110-1 7/31/2016 $ 5,477.50 Inspire MN Event Support (Event Support PO #1021 110-2 7/31/2016 $ 1,680.00 Majestic Tents and Events Event Items (Chairs, Tent, Table) N/A O4982 7/26/2016 $ 308.63 Mayo Clinic EDA Office Furniture N/A 163205 6/3/2016 $ 3,877.43 Saint Paul Riverfront Corporation Table at 22nd Annual Great River Gathering N/A GRG-5 5/18/2016 $ 750.00 Total Invoices $ 23,990.56 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials Master Application For Payment Detail: July 2016 8/1/2016 123 Discovery Square To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: August 19, 2016 Background: In June, Mayo Clinic announced plans to secure a development partner for a significant private investment in Discovery Square. A select group of developers were invited to submit proposals to become Mayo Clinic’s development partner. Next Steps: A Letter of Intent is in the process of being drafted with a goal of announcing the development partner at the end of August. 124 125 126 127 128 129 Marketing Update To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: August 19, 2016 Background: Clarity Coverdale Fury (CCF) presented final media and creative plan to DMC Staff on August 11. DMC wants to raise its national profile while demonstrating momentum in Rochester. This phase of the DMC marketing strategy focuses on a coordinated paid media effort and creative supplemented by public relations, communications (newsletter and social media) and outreach strategies. Progress: Work completed by CCF consists of the following deliverables: 1. Brand Messaging: Developing a collective message about the value proposition of Rochester and the economic drivers for DMC 2. Marketing Plan: Creating a marketing plan which will help drive results of the DMC priorities, including realizing the economic development potential of DMC, generating market demand, and building local to international support 3. Media and Creative Plan: Gaining national attention for DMC with desired audiences; demonstrating progress being made every day in Rochester; driving traffic to dmc.mn; implementing creative assets and toolkit through integrated marketing and communication channels. Audiences: The target audiences are engaged at varying levels, from awareness to action. The timeline prioritizes the audiences: • Those already invested • Local, regional and national business partners • Mayo Clinic Strategic Partners • Bioscience and other start ups • Investors and Developers Next Steps: Phase II – Execution of the Marketing Plan CCF has presented a final marketing plan proposal for Phase Two to be reviewed and approved by the DMC EDA. The execution of the marketing plan includes communication strategies, timeline and scope of work for the marketing deliverables from June 2016 through 2017: • Finalize targeted media and communication plan • Network and leverage partnerships through business partners • Promote proof points locally, nationally and internationally 130 Prototyping Event To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: August 19, 2016 Background: DMC has been working with Rochester Downtown Alliance and Rochester Art Center on a new program concept for Rochester called PlaceMaker|Rochester Prototyping Festival. This is a year-long initiative that began in January and will conclude with a final report and analysis in December, punctuated by numerous public events and activities, the most visible of which is the September 15-17 public display of project installations held in conjunction with Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation’s Transform Conference. Prototyping is a business strategy used to evaluate the impact of a project or methodology before investing in the generally high cost of final design and installation. This approach is being used in the urban environment to test out new and creative solutions to city building challenges. The theme for our program this year is Health and the Built Environment. Twenty-three prototype proposals were submitted; 16 were selected for funding, development, and installation. Next Steps: Preparing for the three day event in September by supporting the individual makers, launching a marketing and communications program, and organizing the event logistics. 131 Metrics To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: August 19, 2016 Background: All indicators and baseline metrics for the DMC dashboard have been identified and compiled. Wilder Research has been a valued partner in gathering the metrics and DMC EDA staff have had several calls with Wilder Research staff to discuss the results of their work. DMC EDA continues to refine the presentation format for the dashboard, and we have identified the Central Corridor Funder’s Collaborative “Central Corridor Tracker” for Minneapolis and Saint Paul’s Green Line Light Rail Transit (LRT) as a model to emulate. Next Steps: 1) Design review of the dashboard 2) Publish dashboard 3) Examine models for interactive dashboard webpage 132 133 DMC Metrics Dashboard Goals Comprehensive Strategic Plan Create a comprehensive strategic plan with a compelling vision that harnesses the energy and creativity of the entire community. Attract Private Investment Leverage the public investment to attract more than $5 billion in private investment to Rochester and the region. Create Jobs & Generate Tax Revenue Strengthen the local economy. Become the Destination for Health & Wellness Achieve the highest quality patient, companion, visitor, employee, and resident experience, now and in the future. 1 42 3 DMC Metrics Dashboard: Year 1 Destination Medical Center is a one-of-a-kind, $5.6 billion economic development initiative in Rochester, Minnesota. It is the largest public-private partnership in state history, designed to position Minnesota as a global center for the highest quality medical care and to generate high-value jobs, new tax revenue, and businesses. The DMC plan was adopted in April 2015 and the Destination Medical Economic Development Agency (DMC EDA) was formed to provide the staffing and services to support the DMC Corporation and to implement the DMC plan working with the City of Rochester. DMC Mission With Mayo Clinic at its heart, the Destination Medical Center initiative is the catalyst to position Rochester, Minnesota as the world’s premier destination for health and wellness; attracting people, investment opportunities, and jobs to America’s City for Health and supporting the economic growth of Minnesota, its bioscience sector, and beyond. About the Dashboard The DMC Metrics Dashboard uses a set of goals, outcomes, and indicators to showcase the impact that the DMC initiative has on the DMC District, the City of Rochester, and the State of Minnesota over time. “Goals” are the five goals of the DMC Development Plan, which have been consolidated into four dashboard goals for ease of data collection and reporting, are the foundation of the DMC Metrics Dashboard. “Outcomes” are the quantifiable results that will demonstrate the achievement of the DMC goals. “Indicators” are the reliable data sources that will illustrate realization of the outcomes. The DMC EDA has created the DMC Metrics Dashboard to follow a set of indicators that will demonstrate the success of the mission and vision of the DMC initiative. The 2015 DMC Metrics Dashboard provides baseline data from which to measure annual indicator changes. DMC EDA retained Wilder Research on the creation and data population of the DMC Metrics Dashboard. DMC Metrics Dashboard 2015 134 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Goal 1: Create a comprehensive strategic plan with a compelling vision that harnesses the energy and creativity of the entire community Outcome A: Rochester-area citizens are informed and engaged in on-going DMC planning Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Public meetings convened by DMC TBD TBD / 11 NA 2 DMC-hosted events TBD TBD / 15 NA 3 Presentations by DMC staff and ambassadors in community meetings TBD TBD / 126 NA 4 Community engagement via social media and web (Facebook & twitter followers, website visitors) TBD TBD / 39,200 NA 5 Hosted Community Leader/Stakeholder Meetings TBD TBD / 22 NA Outcome B: Government officials are informed and engaged in on-going DMC planning Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Meetings with State Legislators, County Commissioners, and other officials TBD TBD NA Goal 2: Leverage the public investment to attract more than $5 billion in private investment to Rochester and the region Outcome A: Public support will be used to leverage more than $5.0 billion of Private Investor in DMC over 20 years Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Private investment (annual amount) TBD TBD / $85.7 million DMC District Outcome B: $585.0 Million in contributions from the state and local governments Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 City of Rochester contribution TBD $9.85 Million / TBD DMC District Outcome C: Impactful Real Estate development will increase in DMC district Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Health & Bio-Tech (square feet) TBD TBD / 9.6 million DMC District + Mayo 135 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 2 Retail & Office (square feet) TBD TBD / 15.4 million City of Rochester 3 Hotel (keys) TBD TBD / 5,706 DMC District 4 Residential (units) TBD TBD / 46,231 City of Rochester Outcome D: Entrepreneurial activity increases Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Number of business establishments in Discovery Square TBD TBD DMC District 2 Patent filings by Mayo TBD TBD / 111 NA Outcome E: New businesses are established in each DMC district Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Chamber business members TBD TBD / 1,495 Greater Rochester Area 2 New business establishments TBD TBD DMC District Goal 3: Strengthen the local economy Outcome A: Create approximately 35,000 - 45,000 new jobs in the Rochester area Indicator Baseline 2012 Timeline 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Total Employment 2.6 million 2.7 million / TBD Minnesota 91,020 92,345 / TBD Olmsted County 85,144 86,102 / TBD City of Rochester 36,516 36,823 / TBD DMC District 2 Employment in Healthcare and Social services 435,386 454,509 / TBD Minnesota 40,325 40,266 / TBD Olmsted County 39,897 39,829 / TBD City of Rochester 29,516 29,837 / TBD DMC District 3 Employment in Educational Services 216,094 218,917 / TBD Minnesota 4,680 5,122 / TBD Olmsted County 3,852 4,225 / TBD City of Rochester 250 TBD DMC District 4 Employment in Leisure and Hospitality 261,491 269,420 / TBD Minnesota 136 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 7,983 8,309 / TBD Olmsted County 7,469 7,799 / TBD City of Rochester 1,983 2,138 / TBD DMC District 5 Employment in Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 131,386 141,736 / TBD Minnesota 1,562 1,558 / TBD Olmsted County 1,475 1,460 / TBD City of Rochester 485 469 / TBD DMC District 6 Employment in Construction 101,595 114,261 / TBD Minnesota 2,926 3,359 / TBD Olmsted County 2,070 2,299 / TBD City of Rochester 220 228 / TBD DMC District 7 Construction MBE Goals TBD TBD DMC District 8 Established business with satellite offices TBD TBD DMC District 9 Number of higher education students (2 year and 4 year institutions) 10,628 TBD City of Rochester 10 Number of workforce development programs TBD 7 / TBD City of Rochester Outcome B: Generate approximately $7.5 - $8.0 billion in new net tax revenue over 35 years Indicator Baseline 2012 Timeline 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 State tax revenues $14.6 billion TBD Minnesota 2 County tax revenues $579 million TBD Olmsted County 3 City tax revenues TBD TBD City of Rochester 4 School district tax revenues TBD TBD City of Rochester Goal 4: Achieve the highest quality patient, companion, visitor, employee, and resident experience, now and in the future Outcome A: More people visit Rochester Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Annual Total of Hotel Stays (Rooms booked) 1.1 million 1.2 million / 1.3 million City of Rochester 2 Average Hotel Occupancy (Percent of available rooms booked) 57.9% 62.1% / 61.9% City of Rochester 3 Number of rooms available to rent 5,270 5,419 / 5,706 City of Rochester 4 Number of convention center events 358 367 / 274 City of Rochester 5 Number of convention center attendees 316,312 303,087 / 288,603 City of Rochester 6 Number of “National Patients” TBD TBD / 115,748 DMC District 137 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Outcome B: Increase recreational and leisure opportunities Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Arts and culture events 663 790 / 893 City of Rochester 2 Arts and culture event attendees 449,585 358,156 / 494,376 City of Rochester 3 Sporting events 69 73 / 80 City of Rochester 4 Sporting event attendees 92,700 118,900 / 114,550 City of Rochester 5 Outdoor recreation: Number of parks 112 TBD City of Rochester 5 TBD DMC District 6 Outdoor recreation: Park acreage 3,661 TBD City of Rochester 60.3 TBD DMC District 7 Outdoor cafes in the DMC district TBD TBD DMC District Outcome C: Create a healthier environment for residents, patients, and visitors Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Obesity Rate 25.7% 25.5% / 27.6% Minnesota TBD TBD / 28% Olmsted County 2 Diabetes Rate 7.3% 7.4% / 8.1 Minnesota TBD 13% / TBD Olmsted County 3 Vaccination Rate (Childhood Vaccination Series) TBD TBD Minnesota TBD 82% / TBD Olmsted County 4 Number of Park & Rec activities (or programs) TBD TBD City of Rochester 5 Number participating in park and rec activities TBD TBD City of Rochester 6 Nice ride usage (biking) TBD TBD DMC District 7 Percentage of days air quality is “good” 76.6% 85.5% / 89.5% Olmsted County 8 Energy from renewable hydro sources (Mega Watt Hours) 13,032 12,749 / 12,835 City of Rochester 9 Energy from renewable photovoltaic sources: Net Metering Customers TBD 33 / 56 City of Rochester 10 Energy from renewable wind sources: Net Metering Customers TBD 0.003 / 0.003 City of Rochester Outcome D: History is protected Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Number of National Register of Historic Places within Rochester 14 TBD City of Rochester Outcome E: Improved transportation system Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 138 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT 1 Proportion of residents with a commute time of less than 30 minutes 70% 68.4% / TBD Minnesota 88.1% 87.4% / TBD Olmsted County 89.3% 90.6% / TBD City of Rochester 2 Transit system ridership 1.74 million 1.67 / 1.8 million City of Rochester 3 Number of transit stops 590 TBD / 616 City of Rochester 4 Transit weekday operation run time (hours per day) TBD TBD / 12.5 City of Rochester 5 Transit weekend operation run time (hours per day) TBD TBD / 10.25 City of Rochester 6 Mode shift goal progress (% not commuting to work via car) 13% 13.5% / TBD Minnesota 12.9% 15.1% / TBD Olmsted County 14.8% 17.1% / TBD City of Rochester Outcome F: Housing options are affordable for all ranges of incomes Indicator Baseline 2012 2014 / 2015 Geography 1 Share of households paying less than 30% of their income for housing 69.9% 71.7% / TBD Minnesota 74.2% 76.5% / TBD Olmsted County 73.7% 74.7% / TBD City of Rochester 2 Share of homeowners paying less than 30% of their income for housing 76.7% 79.2% / TBD Minnesota 82.5% 84.6% / TBD Olmsted County 83.9% 84.5% / TBD City of Rochester 3 Share of renters paying less than 30% of their income for housing 51.8% 51.7% / TBD Minnesota 50.6% 53.7% / TBD Olmsted County 49.0% 52.3% / TBD City of Rochester 139 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Context Data 140 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT Context Data 141 TO:  Jim Bier, Treasurer   Kathleen Lamb, Attorney    FR:  Dale Martinson, Assistant Treasurer  Date:  August 18, 2016  RE:  July 2016 Financial Budget Summary    The attached summary for July reflects expenditures to date totaling $ 981,148 of the 2016  budget of $4,260,812.  The total remaining 2016 budget of $ 3,279,664 represents 77% of the  original budget remaining with 5 months (42%) of the year remaining.  In the DMCC direct costs section, the $2,279 outlay in July was primarily attorney fees and  building rental.  The second page of this summary now reflects DMCC approved CIP project costs that are being  implemented by the City. Total capital expenditures of $7,050,629 primarily represents the  Chateau Theater purchase as well as the various transit studies underway.  This is our first  attempt at this so please offer any suggestions you might have as to format.  The DMC EDA costs are billed both through Master Application for Payments (MAPs) for  outside contractors and through working capital loan advances for the EDA payroll and other  operational expenses.  DMC EDA Payroll and Operational expenses paid through July amounted  to $316,701 with contract payments through the MAP process totaling $552,762.  Details of  those contract payments including remaining contract commitments can be found on the third  through fifth pages of the summary as provided by the DMC EDA.  An additional MAP request for was submitted in early August for July expenses in the amount of  $23,991.  These costs are not reflected in the totals of the May report.  Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.  142 Destination Medical Center Corporation Financial Budget Summary July 2016 2016 Approved Curent Month July 2016 Amount Percent Approved Budget July 2016 YTD Remaining Remaining DMCC Board Expenses 36,612                                  573                               36,039                   98% General Administrative Services 180,600                                5,317                             27,988                         152,612                 85% Professional Services 780,600                                39,054                          83,123                         697,477                 89% City Expenses 275,000                                ‐                                 ‐                                275,000                 100% Subtotal DMCC 1,272,812                             44,371                          111,684                       1,161,128             91% Third Party Costs ‐ DMC EDA * Payroll, Staff, Administration & Benefits‐EDA 777,000                                61,534                          318,504                       458,496                 59% DMC EDA Operational Costs 163,000                                3,336                             20,712                         142,288                 87% Economic Development Outreach & Support 495,000                                21,655                         473,345                 96% Professional Services 1,148,000                             98,257                          435,673                       712,327                 62% Miscellaneous Expenses 405,000                                72,920                         332,080                 82% Subtotal EDA 2,988,000                             163,126                        869,464                       2,118,536             71% Total DMCC 2016 4,260,812                             207,497                        981,148                       3,279,664             77% * Note: An additional EDA July Request for May totalling $23,990.56 was outstanding DMCC Working Capital Note 1,000                                     as of 7/31/2016 and paid in August.EDA Working Capital Note 50,000                    143 DMCC Authorized CIP Projects As Of July 31,2016 Managed by the City of Rochester DMCC Project DMCC Project Revenues DMCC Project Expenditures to Date DMCC Project Budget 8611C- - Sn/S12AvSW/NW<2StSW>2StNW 3,827 300,000 8612C- - WZmbrRvrSn/SRlfLin<CookPk>CCDr 200,000 8613C- - Chateau Theatre Bldg Purchase 502,655 6,159,794 500,000 8614C- - DMCTransit&InfrastrctrPgrmMgmt 393,788 500,000 8617C- - Broadway @ Center Parking Ramp 10,500,000 8618C- - SharedParkngStudy&PrgmDevlpmnt 142,865 200,000 8620C- - City Loop Plan 108,904 200,000 8621C- - Transit Circulator Study 116,099 538,535 8623C- - DMCC Street Use Study 125,351 775,465 Totals 502,655 7,050,629 13,714,000 144 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials Application Details Statement of Project Application Number:June 2016 Original 2016 Budget 2,988,188.00$ Application Date:7/1/2016 Current 2016 Budget 2,988,188.00$ Period From:6/1/2016 Period To:6/30/2016 Total completed to date via MAP process 552,762.67$ Retainage to Date -$ Sources of Funds:Total completed via MAP process less retainage 552,762.67$ City Contribution 101,592.62$ Less previous Map requests 451,170.05$ --$ Current MAP Request Amount Due 101,592.62$ --$ --$ 2016 operational expenses funded to date 316,701.11$ Total Sources 101,592.62$ Total 2016 City Contribution 869,463.78$ % of 2016 Budget 29.1% Approvals Uses of Funds: EDA Staff Costs -$ EDA Operational Costs 3,336.00$ Econ Dev Outreach & Support -$ EDA:Date Professional Services 98,256.62$ Miscellaneous Costs -$ Total Uses 101,592.62$ DMCC:Date Master Application for Payment Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency 145 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials Master Application For Payment Detail: June 2016 DMC EDA P&L Description Vendor Contract #Previous Billings Current Work in Place Total Work to Date EDA Staff Costs 1,803.15$ -$ 1,803.15$ Payroll Smart-Fill NA 1,803.15$ -$ 1,803.15$ EDA Operational Costs 17,375.62$ 3,336.00$ 20,711.62$ Website, Drafting, Hosting Brandhoot 4043 15,924.00$ 3,336.00$ 19,260.00$ Website, Drafting, Hosting Brandhoot NA 210.00$ -$ 210.00$ IT Hardware & Support Data Smart 4044 1,241.62$ -$ 1,241.62$ Econ Dev Outreach & Support 21,655.00$ -$ 21,655.00$ Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships DEED NA 5,000.00$ -$ 5,000.00$ Outreach, Print & Collateral Fuse Digital 4042 2,025.00$ -$ 2,025.00$ Outreach, Print & Collateral Journal Communications NA 8,755.00$ -$ 8,755.00$ Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Exec NA 450.00$ -$ 450.00$ Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships RCTC NA 600.00$ -$ 600.00$ Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce NA 3,950.00$ -$ 3,950.00$ Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Rochester Downtown Alliance NA 750.00$ -$ 750.00$ Conferences, Meetings, Travel & Sponsorships Rochester Trolley & Tour Company NA 125.00$ -$ 125.00$ Professional Services 337,416.18$ 98,256.62$ 435,672.80$ Other Contracting Services Brandhoot 4016 4,367.52$ -$ 4,367.52$ Other Contracting Services Catharine Jones 4058 3,780.00$ 1,455.00$ 5,235.00$ Marketing Communications & Advertising Clarity Coverdale Fury (CCF)4052 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 100,000.00$ Marketing Communications & Advertising Clarity Coverdale Fury (CCF)NA 3,700.00$ -$ 3,700.00$ Financial Reporting Services CliftonLarsonAllen NA 2,950.00$ -$ 2,950.00$ Financial Reporting Services Lund Tax & Accounting NA 720.00$ -$ 720.00$ Other Contracting Services Deluxe NA 643.02$ -$ 643.02$ Other Contracting Services EJ Photography NA 350.00$ -$ 350.00$ Other Contracting Services Gina Osmond NA 1,312.50$ -$ 1,312.50$ Other Contracting Services Himle Rapp 4056 81,545.83$ 16,332.17$ 97,878.00$ 7/1/2016 Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Master Application for Payment 146 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials Master Application For Payment Detail: June 2016 7/1/2016 Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Master Application for Payment Other Contracting Services Imagebridge Design NA 18,960.00$ 4,140.00$ 23,100.00$ Other Contracting Services Inspire MN, LLC 4041 35,525.00$ 7,752.50$ 43,277.50$ Other Contracting Services Majestic Tents & Events NA 1,230.31$ -$ 1,230.31$ Other Contracting Services MarketaBelle 4055 18,108.00$ 2,220.00$ 20,328.00$ Other Contracting Services Medical Alley NA 1,575.00$ -$ 1,575.00$ Other Contracting Services Michael Best NA 200.00$ -$ 200.00$ Other Contracting Services Momentum NA 2,000.00$ -$ 2,000.00$ Other Contracting Services Nelsen BioMedical 4057 37,357.00$ 16,356.95$ 53,713.95$ Other Contracting Services Nelson Nygaard NA 1,235.00$ -$ 1,235.00$ Other Contracting Services Our City NA 16,260.00$ -$ 16,260.00$ Other Contracting Services St Paul River Front Corporation NA 4,997.00$ -$ 4,997.00$ Other Contracting Services Terra Eclipse, Inc.NA 21,600.00$ -$ 21,600.00$ Other Contracting Services Wilder Research 4054 16,500.00$ -$ 16,500.00$ Other Contracting Services University of Minnesota 4053 12,500.00$ -$ 12,500.00$ Miscellaneous Costs 72,920.10$ -$ 72,920.10$ Insurance & Taxes Aon Risk Services 72,920.10$ -$ 72,920.10$ Project Total 451,170.05$ 101,592.62$ 552,762.67$ 147 MAP for undisputed labor, services, or materials Vendor Name Description Contract #Invoice #Invoice Date Invoice Amount Brandhoot Website Maintenance Agreement 4043 1455 6/1/2016 3,336.00$ Catharine Jones Communications Support (June)4058 4 6/30/2016 1,455.00$ Clarity Coverdale Fury Project Order #5 (Description)4052 PO #5 6/30/2016 50,000.00$ Himle Rapp June Strategy Support 4056 616 7/5/2016 16,332.17$ Image Bridge Design Support 4061 16080 6/30/2016 4,140.00$ Inspire MN Communications Support (June)4041 109-1 6/30/2016 4,515.00$ Inspire MN Event Support (Bio 2016 - June)PO# 1020 109-3 6/30/2016 1,592.50$ Inspire MN Event Support (June)PO# 1020 109-2 6/30/2016 1,645.00$ Marketabelle Social Media Management (June)4055 4 6/30/2016 2,148.00$ Marketabelle Social Media Management (June)4055 4 7/1/2016 72.00$ Nelsen Biomedical Bio 2016 Conference Contract & Bio Support 4057 1046 6/30/2016 16,356.95$ Total Invoices 101,592.62$ Master Application for Payment Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Master Application For Payment Detail: June 2016 7/1/2016 148