Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4/27/2017 DMCC Board of Directors Meeting - Agenda and Meeting Packet
DESTIN ATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPOR ATION (DMCC) BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 9:30 A.M. THURSDAY, April 27, 2017 MAYO CIVIC CENTER - ROCHESTER This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 1 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION (DMCC) BOARD MEETING Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:30 A.M. AGENDA Page I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 IV. Approval of Minutes: February 8, 2017……………………………………………………………………………………………….3 V. Public Comment Period VI. Chair’s Report A. Executive Committee Report B. Transportation Work Session………………………………………………………………….7 C. Project Matrix……………………………………………………………………………………29 D. Resolution A: Commending Stevan Kvenvold………………………………………………31 VII. Project Approval Conditions A. Resolution B: Requiring Additional Review of Projects upon Material Deviation from Approvals Granted………………………………………………………………………..33 VIII. Project Update (City of Rochester, DMC EDA) A. Public Realm Design Panel (Facilitator: Tom Fisher, College of Design, University of Minnesota)……………………………………………………………………………………35 a. DMC Design Guidelines (Terry Spaeth, City of Rochester) b. Heart of the City (Jon Buggy, RSP Architects) c. Chateau Theatre (Steve Schmidt, Riverside Concerts) d. Saint Marys Place (Andy Masterpole, SEH) e. Discovery Square (Patrick Seeb, DMC EDA) B. Discovery Square Project (Presenter: Jeremy Jacobs, Mortenson)………………………65 C. Other Projects IX. Mayo Clinic Five Year Facilities Update (Presenter: Tim Siegfried and Gail Eadie, Mayo Clinic Facilities Planning & Design)……………………………………………………………………... 67 X. DMC EDA Report A. Metrics Dashboard……………………………………………………………………………..101 B. Marketing Metrics………………………………………………………………………………. XI. DMCC 2017 Budget: Year to Date Update………………………………………………………………………………………….111 XII. Meeting Schedule: A. Next Regular Meeting: July 13, 2017 at 9:30 A.M. XIII. Adjournment This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 2 DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION (DMCC) BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTES Wednesday, February 8, 2017 I.Call to Order. Chair Tina Smith called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. at the Mayo Civic Center, Riverview Suite, located at 30 Civic Center Drive SE, Rochester, MN 55904. II.Roll Call. In attendance were Chair Tina Smith, R.T. Rybak, Council Member Mark Hickey, Susan Park Rani, Commissioner Jim Bier, and Mayor Ardell Brede. III.Approval of Agenda. Commissioner Bier moved approval of the Agenda. Ms. Park Rani seconded. Ayes (6), Nays (0), Motion carried. IV.Approval of Minutes: December 15, 2016. Commissioner Bier moved approval of the Minutes of the meeting held on December 15, 2016. Council Member Hickey seconded. Ayes (6), Nays (0), Motion carried. V.Public Comment Period. Jamie Sunsback, a tenant in the Conley-Maass building, commended the opportunity for start-up businesses. Paula Harden, a disability advocate, noted lack of clarity about the goals of DMC with respect to transit. VI.Chair’s Report. Chair Smith noted the reappointments of Susan Park Rani and R.T. Rybak to six- year terms on the DMCC, and thanked them for their continued service. Chair Smith next noted the significant updates on transportation in Board materials, and recommended scheduling an informal transportation working session, to have in-depth discussions of the transportation studies and plans. Ms. Park Rani noted the volume of work and requested more time to digest it. Finally, Chair Smith made mention of the recent NFL-related competition award earned by GoRout, a Rochester-based technology start-up company. A.Resolution A: Approving the Establishment of an Executive Committee and Outline of Duties. Ms. Park Rani moved approval. Mayor Brede seconded. Ayes (6), Nays (0), Motion carried. B.Resolution B: Approving the February 15 Report to the Legislature. The Report was prepared by the City of Rochester and the DMCC and was approved by City of Rochester Common Council on Monday, January 30, 2017. Council Member Hickey moved approval by the DMCC. Commissioner Bier seconded. 3 Ayes (6), Nays (0), Motion carried. VII.Public Hearing. A.Proposed Modification of the Development District with Respect to the Alatus Project, Located on 2nd Street SW. Chair Smith formally called to order the public hearing for the proposed modification of the development district. Mark Bransford, a Rochester resident, presented comments on behalf of Judge Kevin Lund and offered his own comments regarding the height, density and traffic that will be generated by the proposed Alatus development, and stated that the City’s Second Street Corridor plan, and the proposed DMC Design Guidelines were being ignored Hearing no other persons wanting to present remarks, Chair Smith closed the public hearing. B.Resolution C: Approval of the Proposed Modification of the Development District. Mayor Brede moved approval of Resolution C. Ms. Park Rani seconded. Mr. Rybak and Ms. Park Rani both spoke to the need for parking and transit solutions. Ayes (6), Nays (0), Motion carried. VIII.Project Update (City of Rochester, EDA). EDA Executive Director Lisa Clarke began by providing an update on the DMC website and the status of the EDA finance director and energy/sustainability director positions. A.Transportation Management: Findings and Recommended Next Steps. Ms. Clarke, EDA Director of Economic Development and Placemaking Patrick Seeb, SRF Consulting representatives Beth Bartz and Ken Holte, and City of Rochester Director of Public Works Richard Freese presented the transportation update. Mr. Freese reviewed the evaluation framework, containing four accounts: economy, health and wellness, delivery and community and experience. Mr. Rybak noted that he was pleased with the addition of community and experience, and health and wellness as criteria. Chair Smith was pleased that people are at the center of this evaluation rather than cars. Ms. Bartz outlined the four integrated transit studies: transit circulation, street use and operations, parking and demand management, and the city loop. Several options for transit circulation, including elevated systems, have been examined, and Mr. Freese noted that First and Second Avenues SW are interrupted by plazas and planning for Heart of the City. Mr. Rybak asked the team to reconsider if First Avenue could serve as north-south route from Soldiers Field or other southern points. Mr. Rybak suggested thinking beyond only “practical” options when more innovative solutions may be more suitable. Commissioner Bier noted that the Board, with a variety of perspectives and experience, may be sending mixed signals to the transportation teams. Ms. Bartz discussed street use and operations. Portal capacity has been reviewed by the planning team recently and suggested parking opportunities in new areas may be needed, including parking east or north of downtown. These new parking areas, however, may be 4 remote and on the immediate periphery of downtown. The teams have collected a lot of information, and Mr. Freese is working with Mayo Clinic to determine its peak patient and vehicle volume times. Council Member Hickey noted the emphasis on multi modal transportation and, when noting that some concepts included the elimination of vehicle lanes, stated that artificially eliminating traffic lanes may not be the best option. This concern was echoed by Commissioner Bier. Ms. Park Rani noted needs of workers and residents in 50 years need to be met and that multimodal options need to be present. Mr. Freese suggested that the widespread use of buses and other multiple-rider systems could eliminate large numbers of vehicles and that the planning assumptions seek to achieve the DMC mode-shift goal. Ms. Park Rani suggested public education and engagement is necessary to address parking/transportation goals. Ms. Bartz next presented a parking and travel demand management update. Decongesting routes, encouraging alternative modes of transportation, and other solutions were discussed. Kimley-Horn assessed the current parking program in relation to traffic, and Rochester ranked as a top medium-sized city in terms of integrated transit use and parking management. Some possible solutions include: capturing more people outside of the entrances to downtown, effective transit, autonomous vehicles, adding vehicle lanes where necessary. In all cases, integrated solutions are needed to provide people, and not necessarily vehicle, access. Ms. Bartz reviewed the proposed parking policies. Mr. Rybak stated his support for the policies, including establishing a full-time management authority. Mr. Freese noted Mayo Clinic has a well-managed “in-house” transit management authority and that the primary focus will be on the other 10,000 downtown employees. Finally, Ms. Bartz presented the city loop plans. Ms. Bartz noted that locations for a city loop trail will be important and should allow for downtown user access. Ms. Bartz noted the use of a park-plus model allows users to find parking options, and a new three- dimensional model will allow planners to assess options in a “real world” environment. Mr. Freese and Ms. Bartz also discussed the upcoming milestone schedule. B.Use of Tax Increment Financing Funds for Transit and Public Infrastructure. City of Rochester Assistant Administrator Gary Neumann stated that, according to the DMC development plan, $116 million in public funding will support transit but a value capture district or tax-increment financing could provide additional sources of public funding. Already the City has TIF and economic development districts, and five of eight TIF districts in downtown are already part of a larger economic development district. Excess funds from these districts can be dedicated to transit and parking. C.Urban on First: Proposed Titan/Opus Development between First Avenue SW and Broadway. Mr. Seeb and City of Rochester Redevelopment Director Terry Spaeth provided an update on the Titan/Opus development, a high-density apartment building with a green roof, biking amenities, and retails spaces. EDA and City staff recommend supporting the $38 million project with $3.8 million in tax-increment financing. Once complete, the annual property tax revenues will increase from approximately $70,000 to $472,000. 5 Resolution D: Approving Urban on First as a Public Infrastructure Project, with Conditions. Commissioner Bier moved approval. Council Member Hickey seconded. General Counsel Kathleen Lamb proposed an amendment to the third “be it resolved,” suggesting that “90 days” be amended to state “following city approval for land use and planning, and in any event, no later than July 18, 2017.” Mayor Brede moved approval of the amendment. Ms. Park Rani seconded. The amendment was approved. Ayes (6), Nays (0), Motion as amended carried. D.Mortenson Project: Proposed Project in Discovery Square. Jeremy Jacobs of M.A. Mortenson Co. highlighted the work completed since Mortenson’s selection as the developer of a portion of Discovery Square and described the work ahead. Mayo Clinic, an expected tenant of the Mortenson building, may include individualized and regenerative medicine functions in the space. Many partners will be needed— Colliers International, HOK and RSP Architects are already engaged, among others—and WMBE inclusion is a key goal. Mr. Jacobs stated that he would follow-up with a report of WMBE inclusion. Groundbreaking is expected in the fourth quarter of 2017. E.Subdistrict Update. 1.Heart of the City: Public Realm Design. Jon Buggy of RSP Architects and Robin Ganser of Coen+Partners provided the public realm design update. The project is on schedule to provide a cost and plan estimate in July 2017. The Heart of the City Community Advisory Committee, EDA, and the City of Rochester are all engaged in the public realm planning. The RSP-led team has met with hundreds of residents and is striving to create solutions that are authentic to Rochester and serve three distinct user groups: patients/visitors, community members/business stakeholders, and visitors. Ms. Park Rani asked about the participation of WMBE- and small- businesses. 9square, owned by local architect Adam Ferrari, is a member of the design team and WMBE firms will be engaged in the build process to achieve DMC targeted business goals. IX. DMCC 2017 Budget: Year to Date Update. Commissioner Bier presented the update. X.Meeting Schedule: A.Next Regular Meeting: April 27, 2017, at 9:30 A.M. XI.Adjournment. Chair Smith adjourned the meeting. 876506-3.DOCX 6 DMC Integrated Transportation Studies DMCC Workshop Agenda April 18, 2017 9:00 – 11:10 am Mayo Civic Center, Rooms 110 and 111 Workshop Goals: •To obtain input that will help the City narrow the current group of scenarios to something less than 6 •To identify any “red flag” concerns so that they can be addressed Integrated Transit Scenarios have been developed which combine a range of parking location approaches and transit alignments/modes/profiles (also in combination with City Loop route alternatives and Pedestrian Streets/protected bike lanes) to examine how they respond to DMC parking and multi-modal transportation needs. In this workshop, we will discuss how we arrived upon these scenarios and describe key elements of each, allowing ample time for questions and discussion. During the workshop we will also address the timeline and process for narrowing down these six scenarios to a single preferred alternative by the end of 2017. The workshop will conclude with a discussion of materials to be presented at the April 27 DMCC Board Meeting. Agenda: 1)Introduction of Scenarios (Beth B) a.Purpose of scenarios b. Integrated Transit Opportunities c.Integrated Transit Constraints 2) Review of Scenarios (Joni G) a.No Build Scenario b.DMC Modified Scenario c. Scenario A d.Scenario B e. Scenario C f.Scenario D 3)Discussion of Scenarios (All) 4)Timeline for narrowing down the number of scenarios (Beth) 5)Evaluation Framework (Tom B) 6) April 27 DMCC Board Meeting J8618-23_MM_ITSDMCC Workshop__Agenda_20170418.docx 7 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT OPPORTUNITIES ST. MARY’S PLACE HEART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ROCHESTER DISCOVERY SQUARE CIVIC CENTER 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center DMC Boundary Rochester PTN Parking Opportunities Key Transit Destinations 8 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT CONSTRAINTS 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center DMC Boundary Constrained Roadway Portals Constrained Street Corridors Adjacent Existing Residential Areas Steep Topography 9 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/11/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT NO BUILD SCENARIO LEGEND T H W Y 5 2 T H W Y 5 2 BR O A D W A Y A V E E A S T C I R C L E D R VIOLARD NE COLLEGE VIEW RD THWY 14 MA R I O N R D S I M P S O N R D - C O R D 1 BR O A D W A Y A V E 12 ST SW CO RD 2 5 S W CO R D 2 2 S W 2 ST SW COU N T R Y C L U B R D 12 ST SE TH W Y 6 5 THWY 52 THWY 5 2 TH W Y 5 2 T H W Y 6 5 48 ST CO RD 148 CO RD 101 THW Y 1 4 VALLEYHIGH RD 65 ST 75 ST 55 ST 1 8 A V E THWY 1 4 W E S T C I R C L E D R 37 ST NW TH W Y 6 3 CIVIC CENTER DR 0 3,800 7,600 Feet East Park Silver Lake Park Quarry Hill Nature Center Northern Heights Park Foster Arend Park Indian Heights Park Cooke Park Kutzky Park Watson Sports Complex Essex ParkKings Run Park Schmidt Park KR-6 Reservoir KR-7 Reservoir Manor Park Cascade Lake Park Willow Creek Reservoir Gamehaven Reservoir Smekta Park McQuillan Field Joyce Park Eastwood Park Homestead Park Fuad Mansour Sports Complex Rochester Youth Baseball Complex Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Hadley Creek Golf Learning Center Graham Park Mayowood Corridor Northern Hills Golf Course DMC Boundary Comprehensive Plan Park and Ride Rochester PTN Beyond 20 year PTN Intermediate PTN 10 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT DMC MODIFIED SCENARIO WITH PEDESTRIAN 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND ST. MARY’S PLACE HEART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ROCHESTER DISCOVERY SQUARE CIVIC CENTER CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center DMC Boundary Primary Building Entrance Parking (Subject to Freeway Access Feasibility Analysis) Rochester PTN Transit (Streetcar / Exclusive Lane) City Loop Periphery Parking High Pedestrian Amenity Streets 11 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT SCENARIO A WITH PEDESTRIAN 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND ST. MARY’S PLACE HEART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ROCHESTER DISCOVERY SQUARE CIVIC CENTER CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center High Pedestrian Amenity Streets DMC Boundary Primary Building Entrance Periphery Parking Remote Parking Rochester PTN Transit (BRT or Tram) Transit (Future) City Loop Protected Bike Lane 12 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT SCENARIO B WITH PEDESTRIAN 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND ST. MARY’S PLACE HEART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ROCHESTER DISCOVERY SQUARE CIVIC CENTER CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center DMC Boundary Primary Building Entrance Periphery Parking Remote Parking Rochester PTN Transit (BRT) Transit (Subterranean) Transit (Future) City Loop Protected Bike Lane High Pedestrian Amenity Streets 13 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 INTEGRATED TRANSIT SCENARIO C WITH PEDESTRIAN 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND ST. MARY’S PLACE HEART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ROCHESTER DISCOVERY SQUARE CIVIC CENTER CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center DMC Boundary Primary Building Entrance Periphery Parking Remote Parking Rochester PTN Elevated Transit (AGT, AV) Transit (Future) City Loop Protected Bike Lane High Pedestrian Amenity Streets Note: Scenarios A, B and Modified DMC incorporate unique city loop options. Scenarios C and D reflect the Modified DMC city loop option. 14 J8613-23 Integrated Transit Studies DMC_BASEMAP_ENLARGE.INDD: 04/17/2017 0 1,000 2,000 Feet LEGEND ST. MARY’S PLACE HEART OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ROCHESTER DISCOVERY SQUARE CIVIC CENTER CROSSROADS DR SW 7 A V E S W FO X K N O L L D R S W 3 A V E N W 18 A V E S W MEMORIAL PKW Y S W 4 ST SE W S I L V E R L A K E D R 14 ST SW 16 A V E N W CI V I C C E N T E R D R N E FOLWELL DR SW 12 ST SE 14 ST NE 6 ST SE 16 ST SW WE S T S I L V E R L A K E D R N E BR O A D W A Y A V E N CI V I C C E N T E R D R S E 6 A V E N W 3 A V E N W 4 A V E N W 3 A V E S E 2 ST NW 3 A V E S W 4 A V E S W 4 ST SW 10 ST SW BR O A D W A Y A V E N 26 A V E N W 6 A V E S W CENTER ST E 14 ST NW 23 A V E S W CO R D 1 4 6 S E 16 ST SE W F R T G R D T H 5 2 N 7 ST NE 2 ST SW CENTER ST W 8 A V E S E 13 ST NW 8AVESE 9 ST SE SAL E M R D S W 9 A V E S W EL T O N H I L L S D R N W CIVIC CENTER DR NW 6 ST SW 10 A V E S W 1 4 A V E S W GEO R G E G I B B S D R S W VA L L E Y H I G H D R N W 12 ST SW 17 A V E S W 3 A V E S W 7 ST NW BR O A D W A Y A V E S 11 A V E N W Slatterly Park Silver Lake Park Indian Heights Park Goose Egg Park Thompson Mill Race Cooke Park Kutzky Park Younge Park Plummer House St. Marys Park Central Park Cascade Lake Park Graham Arena Complex Mayo Field Park Soldiers Memorial Field Zumbro South Park Rochester Bike Trail Graham Park Mayo Civic Center INTEGRATED TRANSIT SCENARIO D WITH PEDESTRIAN High Pedestrian Amenity DMC Boundary Primary Building Entrance Remote Parking Periphery Parking City Loop Protected Bike Lane Rochester PTN Transit (At grade north of Civic Center Drive. Elevated south of Civic Center Drive) Note: Scenarios A, B and Modified DMC incorporate unique city loop options. Scenarios C and D reflect the Modified DMC city loop option. 15 DMC Scenario Summary Matrix Revised Apr-11-2017 Scenario Parking Strategy* (allocation of 25,000 spaces) Downtown Circulator Strategy Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Focused Routes No Build PTN: BRT service (shares traffic lane) on Broadway and 2nd St per Comp Plan Remote: park & ride locations per comp plan Peripheral: None Downtown: provided per existing code requirements No downtown circulator Primary Transit Network (PTN) as proposed in the draft Comprehensive Plan. Commuter coaches drop off/pick up at new 2017 locations. No City Loop. Ped routes as identified in Comp Plan – 3rd St NW, east of Broadway, 6th St SW, 7th Ave SW, 2nd St NW Bike facilities as identified in Comp Plan – 6th Ave NW/SW, 3rd St SW/SE, 2nd Ave SW south of 3rd St SW, Civic Center Dr, 3rd Ave SE DMC Remote: park & ride locations identified on DMC Master Plan, Section 7, p. 63; cost provided on p. 64; plan also discusses regional park and rides Peripheral: Central Station (need to clarify number of spaces at this location); Figure 7.5-13 (p.71) shows two future mobility centers east and west of downtown Downtown: 16,000 net new (Fig 7.4-25, p.52) DMC Plan, Vol II Section 7.5.2 Streetcar circulator (Fig. 7.5-1). Would also require an O&M facility. Escalated cost $300m. (p. 74) 2nd Street service combined with park and ride transit along 2nd Street to achieve 5-minute frequency Streetcar and buses to share dedicated lanes, level boarding, off-board fare collection on transit priority streets – 3rd Ave NW/SW, 1st Ave NW/SW, 6th St SW/SE, 3rd St NW (cost p. 67) Commuter Coaches pick up/drop off at Transit Terrace. Regional express service to more than double. Additional 80- 120 new commuter coaches required (p. 64) As identified in the DMC plan – Figure 7.5- 34,35 (p.121-123) DMC Modified “Transit Terrace” Intermodal function moved to 52 Corridor north of 2nd Street. Peripheral parking (Civic Center Dr and Fullerton facilities) Remote: park & ride locations identified on p. 63; cost provided on p. 64; plan also discusses regional park and rides Peripheral: “Transit Terrace” Intermodal function moved to 52 Corridor north of 2nd Street includes 7000 parking spaces. (pending highway access study) Downtown: 16,000 net new (Fig 7.4-25, p.52) DMC Plan, Vol II Section 7.5.2 Streetcar circulator (Fig. 7.5-1). Would also require an O&M facility. Escalated cost $300m. (p. 74) 2nd Street service combined with park and ride transit along 2nd Street to achieve 5-minute frequency Street car and buses to share dedicated lanes, level boarding, off-board fare collection on transit priority streets – 3rd Ave NW/SW, 4th Ave NW/SW, 4th St SW/SE (cost p. 67) Commuter Coaches pick up/drop off at “Transit Terrace” at Hwy 52 location. Regional express service to more than double. Additional 80-120 new commuter coaches required (p. 64) Route modifications from DMC plan include: Easterly river crossing connects to 8th Ave NW. Northern leg follows 3rd St NW and 2nd St NW/NE. Northern leg of northern passage follows Center St NE. 2nd St segment extends from 11th Ave SW to 4th Ave SW. Protected bike lanes on 4th Ave NW/SW and W/E Center St High amenity pedestrian streets connecting key areas of downtown (see map) 16 Scenario Parking Strategy* (allocation of 25,000 spaces) Downtown Circulator Strategy Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Focused Routes A Remote 14,500: 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility with 7000 parking spaces; 5,500 at IBM area; 2000 at Fairgrounds Peripheral 1,500: 1,000 at Kmart. 500 at Fullerton Downtown 9,000: patients, hotel, residential, Mayo consultants, students At-grade circulator east-west oriented circulator (Tram or BRT) connecting: 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility - 16th Ave - 2nd Street-Civic Center Drive – 3rd Ave SE-south to Kmart location; Future extension to Fairgrounds parking [rational: easier access at grade; helps street activity] Primary Transit Network (PTN) as proposed in the draft Comprehensive Plan. Commuter coaches transfer at 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility to downtown circulator OR transfer to express service at remote park and ride locations. City Loop: west portion extends to 12th Ave NW/SW. North leg travels on north side of Cascade Creek. East portion on 1st Ave NE. Protected bike lanes on 4th Ave NW/SW and W/E Center St High amenity pedestrian streets connecting key areas of downtown (see map) B Remote 12,500: 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility with 7000 parking spaces; 3,500 at IBM area; 2000 at Fairgrounds Peripheral 3,500: 2,000 along Civic Center Dr. (requires 1 lane expansion of Civic Center Dr in each direction); 1,000 at Kmart 500 at Fullerton Downtown 9,000: patients, hotel, residential, Mayo consultants, students At- grade BRT north-south oriented circulator connector: 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility – 4th Ave NW – 6th St SW/SE – 3rd Ave SE. Subterranean autonomous vehicle connection between downtown and St Mary’s. Primary Transit Network (PTN) as proposed in the draft Comprehensive Plan. Commuter coaches transfer at 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility to downtown circulator OR transfer to express service at remote park and ride locations. City Loop: more compact route extending to 9th Avenue on the west, and stays on the south of Cascade Creek. North leg follows 4th St NW, 6th Ave NW and 2nd St NW/NE. East portion on Civic Center Dr. Protected bike lanes on 4th Ave NW/SW and W/E Center St High amenity pedestrian streets connecting key areas of downtown (see map) C Remote 12,500: 5,500 at IBM area; 7000 at 14/52; Peripheral 3,500: Civic Center Intermodal Parking Facility with 2,000 parking spaces (requires 1 lane expansion of Civic Center Dr. in each direction); 500 at Fullerton Downtown 9,000: patients, hotel, residential, Mayo consultants, students Two elevated circulator routes (AGT or AV) serving west downtown (St. Marys) and east downtown (Civic Center). West Elevated route serves: Civic Center Intermodal Facility, Heart of the City, Discovery Square, and St. Mary’s. East Elevated route serves: Civic Center Intermodal Facility, Heart of the City, Discovery Square, UMR, Fullerton Parking area and Civic Center. Both routes could be extended to the north in the future to access parking in 14/52 interchange area. [Rationale: relieves issues with congestion on 2nd St; maximizes opportunity for other modal use] Primary Transit Network (PTN) as proposed in the draft Comprehensive Plan. City Loop: Either Modified DMC, A or B route would work with this scenario. Modified DMC shown to provide city loop context. Protected bike lanes on 4th Ave NW/SW and W/E Center St High amenity pedestrian streets connecting key areas of downtown (see map) 17 Scenario Parking Strategy* (allocation of 25,000 spaces) Downtown Circulator Strategy Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Focused Routes Commuter coaches transfer at Civic Center Drive Intermodal Parking Facility to downtown circulator OR transfer to express service at remote park and ride locations. D . Remote 15,500: 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility with 7000 parking spaces; 8,500 at IBM area. Peripheral 500: 500 at Fullerton Downtown 9,000: patients, hotel, residential, Mayo consultants, students Largely elevated east-west oriented circulator (AGT or AV) connecting the following: 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility - 16th Ave – St Mary’s - 2nd Street-4th Ave SW - Discovery Square- 6th St SW - UMR, to Fullerton parking to 3rd Ave SE - City Hall/Civic Center area. Primary Transit Network (PTN) as proposed in the draft Comprehensive Plan. Commuter coaches transfer at 14/52 Intermodal Parking Facility to downtown circulator OR transfer to express service at remote park and ride locations. City Loop: Either Modified DMC, A or B route would work with this scenario. Modified DMC shown to provide city loop context. Protected bike lanes on 4th Ave NW/SW and W/E Center St High amenity pedestrian streets connecting key areas of downtown (see map) * Peripheral defined as within walking distance of DMC boundary – e.g. Kmart is peripheral, Fairgrounds is not; Civic Center 4th to 11th Ave is peripheral, near 14/52 interchange and beyond is not. Downtown is defined as within the DMC boundary. J8618-23_201702_Scenario_Matrix 18 Identify Purpose & Need Develop Universe of Alternatives Identify best combination of transit, parking, and bike concepts to meet needs and fit constraints Evaluate initial combination of ideas as Tier 1 Screening Present “draft” results of Tier 1 Screening to public and other stakeholders to identify best test scenarios - incorporate comments Finalize Tier 2 Evaluation Criteria Finalize 3 test scenarios Analyze and evaluate 3 test scenarios Present “draft” results of Tier 2 evaluation to public and other stakeholders to identify most promising option Screen out poorest performing scenarios and components Incorporate comments Stakeholders select “draft” most promising option in early October Identify impacts of most promising option and develop visualizations, finance and implementation requirements Present “draft” most prom-ising option to City Council and DMCC Board Compare impacts and results of most promising option to no-build Present results to public and other stakeholders - incorporate comments Finalize preferred alternative September - Public Conversation #1 - Staff Work Session October - Transit Technology Event January - Public Conversation#2 - Staff Work Session September - Public Conversation #4 - Work Sessions (COW, DMC Board, County) August - Staff Work Session October - Staff Work Session December - Public Conversation #5 - Work Sessions (COW, DMCC Board, County) May - Public Conversation #3 - Work Sessions (COW, DMC Board, County) March - Staff Work Session April - DMCC Board Work Session (4/18/2017) - DMCC Board meeting (4/27/2017) September 2016 – January 2017 February – March 2017 May 2017April 2017 June– August 2017 September 2017 October – November 2017 December 2017 MEETINGS AND WORK SESSIONS » ROCHESTER INTEGRATED TRANSIT STUDIES | PROCESS TO DEVELOP AND EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES TIME LINE » Many Options ≈6 Options + No-Build 6 Options + No-Build ≈3 Options + No-Build 3 Options + No-Build <3 Options + No-Build ≈1 Option + No-Build 1 Option NUMBER OF OPTIONS » ACTIONS » 19 2016 2017 Key Milestones A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 1 Public & Stakeholder Engagement Activities Deliverables • Engagement Plan • Summary of Meeting Input • Evaluation Plan 2 Street Use and Operations Study Deliverables • Data Collection • Portal/Street Capacity • Street Typologies • Model Simulations for Test Scenarios • Block Assessment/Design Matrix • Concept Plans & Visualizations 3 Parking and Transportation Management Authority (TMA) Study Deliverables • Parking Supply Inventory • Parking Demand Estimates • Policy Adjustments (Shared Parking) • Financial Analysis/Rates • Parking Scenario Results • TDM Plan (Framework, Strategies, Mechanisms) • Pilot Program • On-Going Plan 4 Transit Circulation Study Deliverables • Previous Work • Purpose and Need • Initial Modes & Alignments • Screening Results • Detailed Alternatives Cost, Ridership & Impacts • Preferred Alternative • Study Report 5 City Loop Study Deliverables • Previous Work • Baseline Conditions • Precedent Guidance • Impacts of Initial Concepts • Preferred Concept • Study Report Rochester Integrated Transit Studies - Milestones and Deliverables Revised April 11, 2017 • Stantec • WSB • Kimley-Horn • AECOM • SRF n Progressive Consulting n Stonebrook n Stonebrook n Community Design Group n Progressive Consulting n MN Best • Kimley-Horn • Nelson\Nygaard • UrbanTrans • SRF • Nelson\Nygaard • HDR • HDR • Kimley-Horn • Cross-Spectrum Acoustics • SEH • Alta • Barr Eng. • REA Workshops & Meetings EvaluationSummary Visualizations Workshops & Meetings EvaluationResults Pilot Programs On-Going Plan Preferred Alternative Detailed Impacts Study Report Study ReportPreferred Concept Workshops & Meetings Design Matrix Delivery Mechanisms Policy/Financial Adjustments Initial Parking Scenario Results Final Parking Scenario Results Screening Results Initial Alternatives Workshops & Meetings EvaluationFramework Portal/Street Capacity Typologies Test Results TDM Strategies Demand Estimates Baseline Conditions Precedent Guidance Impacts of Initial Concepts Workshops & Meetings Engagement Plan 10/27 Transit Technology Event 10/27 DMCC Board Update 12/15 DMCC Board Meeting 1/26 DMCC Board Meeting 4/27 DMCC Board Meeting 7/27 DMCC Board Meeting 11/2 DMCC Board Meeting Data Collection TDM Framework Parking Supply Inventory Previous Work Purpose & Need Previous WorkNotice to Proceed Notice to Proceed Notice to Proceed Notice to Proceed Prototyping Concept Plans 20 April 18, 2017 21 Evaluation Process 1 -Transit/ Parking teams narrow circulator options -Set complete alternatives -Set evaluation framework April May -Evaluation of alternatives complete -Refinement of preferred elements August -Select preferred alternative September 22 Alternatives: What Matters? •Catalyze & Support New Development •Improve Experience for all DMC User Grou p s •Create Opportunities that Promote Health and Well Being •Manage Commute Growth to Ensure Highest Use of Limited Real Estate 223 DMC Investment Foci 324 Building the DMC Vision Authentic urban district with mixed-use neighborhoods and public places Compact, concentrated development critical to achieving desired vitality Pedestrian-first design to create street level interested and maintain skyway/subway systems Cohesive, connected sub-districts Integrated public and private realms 25 Integrated, Value-Driven Process •DMC Guiding Principles for Transportation organized by 4 primary “Evaluation Accounts” •All discipline teams develop evaluation approach tied to “accounts” •Integrated framework for evaluating short-list of alternatives 26 6 Community + Experience Criterion 1 Criterion 2 Criterion 3 27 Key Outcomes •Ensures projects/alternative are evaluated using established DMC Vision and Principles •Ties decisions to established outcomes •Arrays broad spectrum of costs/benefits for decision makers 728 Development Name Developer Purpose Subdistrict Project Address Project Status Anticipated Completion Date Estimated Project Investment DMC Funding Joint Application Submittal Date 1 Residence at Discovery Square Vance Sr. & Barbara Vinar Residential Discovery Square Third Ave. SW and Sixth St. SW Phase I / Predevelopment $ 20,000,000.00 2 Tian‐Opus Project Titan Investments and Opus Group Residential/ Commercial Discovery Square Between 1st Ave. SW and Broadway Ave. S Phase III / Approved $ 38,000,000.00 $3,800,000 Fall 2016 3 Mortenson M.A. Mortenson and Mayo Clinic Research & Innovation Discovery Square First Ave. SW Phase I / Predevelopment 4 Associated Bank Bloom Properties Commercial Downtown Waterfront 206 Broadway Ave. S Under Construction 2017 $ 7,000,000.00 5 Titan Hilton Hotel Titan Investments Hotel/ Commercial Downtown Waterfront Broadway Ave. S and Center St. E Under Construction 2019 $ 125,000,000.00 $6,500,000 Spring 2015 6 The Bloom Project Bloom Properties and City of Rochester Mixed‐Use Downtown Waterfront Riverfront near Second St. SE and Broadway Ave. S Phase I / Predevelopment $ 178,000,000.00 7 Flats on 4th Stencil Group Residential, Affordable Housing Downtown Waterfront 410 3rd Ave. SE Under Construction Fall 2017 $ 17,000,000.00 No 8 Lofts at Mayo Park Pougiales Trust Properties Residential Downtown Waterfront 123 Sixth Ave. SE Completed Spring 2017 $ 7,500,000.00 No 9 Heart of the City North Hammes Company Hotel/ Residential/ Commercial Central Station Center St. W and First Ave. N Tabled $ 98,400,000.00 Fall 2016 10 First Avenue Flats Joseph Development Residential, Affordable Housing Central Station 400 1st Ave. NW Under Construction Spring 2017 $ 13,700,000.00 No 11 Chateau Theatre City of Rochester TBD Heart of the City 15 1st St. SW Phase I / Predevelopment Yes $ 12 Heart of the City Public Space City of Rochester and RSP Architects Public Space Heart of the City Heart of the City Phase I / Predevelopment Yes $ 13 Alatus Alatus, LLC Residential/ Commercial Saint Marys Place Second St. SW and 14th Ave. SW Phase III / Approved $ 115,000,000.00 $10,500,000 Fall 2016 14 Ronald McDonald House Rochester, MN Ronald McDonald House Charities Residential Saint Marys Place 850 2nd St. SW Phase I / Predevelopment $ 15,000,000.00 15 501 on First 501 on First, LLC Residential/ Commercial Discovery Square 501 1st Ave. SW Completed Fall 2016 $ 16,000,000.00 No 16 Conley‐Maass Building Hunter & Traci Downs Commercial Discovery Square 14 4th St. SW Completed Fall 2016 $ 2,200,000.00 No 17 Mayo Civic Center Addition Mayo Civic Center Commercial Downtown Waterfront 30 Civic Center Dr. SE Completed Spring 2017 84,000,000.00$ No 18 Creative Salon Site Pougiales Trust Properties Discovery Square 324 1st Ave. SW Phase I / Predevelopment Projects in the DMC District at a Glance As of 4/19/201729 30 A. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION RESOLUTION NO. ____-2017 Commending Stevan Kvenvold and Expressing Gratitude and Appreciation for His Service to the Destination Medical Center Corporation BACKGROUND RECITALS WHEREAS, the Destination Medical Center Corporation (“DMCC”) was established by law in 2013 to exercise oversight, adopt plans and approve projects as part of an initiative by the State of Minnesota to make Mayo Clinic, and the City of Rochester, Minnesota (the “City”), a destination medical center; and WHEREAS, since its inception, the DMCC has worked closely with the City to accomplish the goals of the law; and WHEREAS, Stevan Kvenvold has served as City Administrator for the City and has been an integral partner in the close cooperation between the DMCC and the City; and WHEREAS, Mr. Kvenvold offered a unique perspective to the DMCC, by virtue of his 47 years of public service to the City, including nine years as Assistant City Administrator and 38 years as City Administrator; and WHEREAS, Mr. Kvenvold has been instrumental in the formation and early years of the destination medical center initiative and extraordinarily helpful to the DMCC; and WHEREAS, Mr. Kvenvold had been unwavering in his stewardship of the City and in his commitment to the citizens of Rochester, as well as in his service to the DMCC and the destination medical center initiative. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Destination Medical Center Corporation Board of Directors, that it commends Stevan Kvenvold for his service to the City of Rochester, his work to advance the destination medical center initiative, and his cooperation with the Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board expresses its gratitude and appreciation to Mr. Kvenvold for his willingness to share his significant expertise and experience with the DMCC, in its goal to make Rochester, Minnesota, America’s City for Health. 877458-4.DOCX 31 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 32 B. DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION RESOLUTION NO. ____-2017 Requiring Additional Review of Projects Upon Material Deviation from Approvals Granted BACKGROUND RECITALS A. The Destination Medical Center Corporation (“DMCC”) is authorized by Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.40 et seq. to approve projects in the development district for consistency with the adopted development plan, as amended (the “Development Plan”). B. The DMCC recognizes that economic development is a dynamic process and aspects of a project may change after an approval of a project; however, a material deviation from an approval warrants further consideration by the DMCC. C. The DMCC desires to establish a policy to ensure that any change to a project after DMCC approval is not a material deviation from such approval and that the project remains consistent with the Development Plan. D. The DMCC contemplates that its policy will complement similar measures established by the City of Rochester (the “City”), to ensure that “as built” projects are consistent with approvals granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Destination Medical Center Corporation Board of Directors that the DMCC Board or Executive Committee will reconsider a prior approval of a project upon a finding presented to the DMCC from either the City or the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency Board of Directors (“EDA”) that any of the following conditions have occurred: 1. A material deviation from the Development Plan; 2. In the case of residential development, an increase or decrease in the number of approved dwelling units by more than 10%; 3. An increase or decrease in the floor area ratio that results in more than 10% change in building coverage on the lot; 4. A significant change in the essence or character of the project as approved. Examples include, but are not limited to: a. Elimination of one of the major approved elements of the project, such as elimination of the residential, retail/commercial or hotel element; 33 b. Significant changes in either the durability or quality of building materials or landscaping; or c. Material deviation from approved energy and sustainability measures. 5. A change to a project that requires approval by the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 6. A significant decrease to overall project costs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon a finding by either the City or EDA that one or more of the conditions set forth in this Resolution has occurred, the City or EDA, either separately or jointly, shall submit such finding in writing to the DMCC, along with a recommended course of action. 876350-3.DOCX 34 Public Realm Design To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: April 21, 2017 Overview: The Destination Medical Center (DMC) is engaged in the design of several public realm initiatives, consistent with the DMC Development Plan. These include: • Design Guidelines • Heart of the City • Chateau Theatre • St. Marys Place • Discovery Square While each is a unique program of work and at a different stage of progress, all tie to the central theme of using public realm to attract private economic development, to connect each of the subdistricts to one another and advance DMC goals of walkability, health, and vitality. Tom Fisher, DMC EDA board member and Director of the University of Minnesota Metropolitan Design Center, will facilitate presentations and follow up discussion for each of these initiatives. We are interested in your feedback and insights related to these projects. 35 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 36 •Design Guidelines •Heart of the City •Chateau Theatre •Saint Marys Place •Discovery Square Public Realm Design 37 Public Realm Design 2nd St. BroadwayHwy 52 38 DMC Design Guidelines 39 Project Goals for Design Guidelines •Provide high quality, attractive spaces (contemporary but connected to the unique history of the city) •Create an ever-changing, lively atmosphere and visual appeal within the downtown core •Human scale, good wayfinding and pedestrian oriented •Create visual interest throughout 40 Progress for Design Guidelines Mid 2015 Launched Community + Steering Committee input Jan 2017 Review Draft Q1 2017 Planning Commission 41 42 Next Steps for Design Guidelines •Planning & Zoning Commission Review •City Council adoption •Ongoing implementation 43 Heart of the City 44 45 Project Goals for Heart of the City •Deliver Pre-Design •Provide Schematic Design •Offer Cost Estimates •Create a Phasing & Implementation Plan 46 Progress for Heart of the City 47 48 Next Steps for Heart of the City •Technical review with property owners •Cost estimates for design alternatives •Presentations to community 49 Chateau Theatre 50 Project Goals for Chateau Theatre Recommend Chateau Theatre •Use •Finance •Governance •Management 51 Progress for Chateau Theatre 2015 DMCC Authorized Jan 2016 City Purchased Reuse Task Force Conducts due diligence Nov 2017 City Council review May 2017 Task Force to reconvene 52 53 Next Steps for Chateau Theatre •City staff review of consultant report •Collaboration with adjacent property owners •Task Force to reconvene •Consider interim steps 54 Saint Marys Place 55 Project Goals for Saint Marys Place •Develop public realm plan for Saint Marys Place subdistrict •Anticipate future development •Consider needs of patients/visitors, local businesses/property owners and nearby neighborhoods 56 57 58 Next Steps for Saint Marys Place •Completion of final concept •Community and City Council presentation •Prototype and demonstration 59 Discovery Square 60 Project Goals for Discovery Square •Connect future Discovery Square subdistrict with other subdistricts •Attract additional development interest •Determine public infrastructure needs 61 Progress for Discovery Square Aug 2016 Conley Maass Building Renovated Oct 2016 Mortenson Selected Feb 2017 Urban on 1st Approved April 2017 Mortenson Concept Dec 2016 501 1st Ave Opened 62 63 Next Steps for Discovery Square •Determine scope of work •Engage design team 64 Discovery Square Project: Mortenson Company initiative To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: April 21, 2017 Overview: In 2016, Mayo Clinic selected Mortenson Company as its development partner for the first phase of its Discovery Square initiative. Subsequently, Mayo, Mortenson, and Destination Medical Center (DMC) have been working together to further refine this relationship, outline respective roles and responsibilities, and develop timetable with significant milestones. Mortenson has assembled a design team, commercial broker, and market analyst. This team has been working closely with DMC, Mayo, and others toward an aggressive project timetable, with groundbreaking in 2017. Next Steps: Mortenson’s 120 Day Work Plan assumes submittal of site plan to City of Rochester, completion of schematic design, presentation to Mayo Trustees and application to DMC. At the April 27th, DMC EDA board meeting Mortenson will provide a project update, key findings to-date, and upcoming project milestones. 65 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 66 Update: Other Projects 4/27/17 DMCC Board Meeting • Parking Ramp # 6 Project On April 10, 2017, the City Council approved the bids for the construction of Parking Ramp #6, on the property lying directly east of the Hilton Project. As the Board may recall, it is a 630 stall ramp that cantilevers over the DM&E RR spur line tracks abutting 1st Avenue SE. Project construction is planned to begin on May 1, 2017 and be completed by August, 2018. • Bloom Riverfront Redevelopment Project The City recently received revised project plans for the proposed redevelopment of the site along the Zumbro River between 2nd Street and 4th Street SE. The project is now being planned as a 2 tower project as was originally proposed, rather than the 3 tower concept that was under consideration. The project components have also been changed to some extent. The developer has indicated a total project cost of approximately $305 million, with building construction cost of approximately $178 million. Staff has recently met with the developer representatives to start discussions on project financing details and potential terms for the various agreements needed. The development team indicated they have recently started working on the completion of the joint City / DMC funding application and plan to have submitted by mid May. • Mortenson Discovery Square Project City staff recently met with the development team to discuss the project land use / zoning approval process and timeframe. City staff has also met with the DMC EDA staff and the development team to discuss the joint City / DMC funding application process and there has been continuing dialogue between the various entities involved in the project, to keep things moving forward with the intent of having the project in a position for a fall 2017 construction start. • Hammes Heart of the City North Project On March 29, 2017, Hammes submitted a written request to withdraw its applications with the City. • First Avenue Flats Project The First Avenue Flats affordable workforce rental housing project consisting of 68 apartments, is nearing the completion of construction. A grand opening event is scheduled for April 28, 2017. While this is not a DMC Project, it is a project that is consistent with the other considerations identified in the DMC Development Plan, one of those being provision of affordable housing in the community. • Design Guidelines/Standards Project The DMC Design Guidelines were before the City Planning & Zoning Commission at a public hearing on March 22, 2017. That was the first opportunity for review and discussion of the guidelines with the Planning Commission and based upon some of the comments and questions raised, staff had suggested that the discussion be continued until the April 26, 2017 Planning Commission meeting in order to provide staff some time to respond to the questions raised. • Downtown Parking Overlay District Text Amendment With the DMC Development Plan indicating the need for a significant amount of additional parking, the City is undertaking an amendment to create a Destination Medical Center Parking Overlay Zone, which will include the lands located within the DMC Boundary Area. The proposed amendment is intended to modify the regulations to better address the policies and principles for off street parking set forth in the Destination Medical Center Development Plan. The City Council reviewed the proposal at a previous Committee of the Whole meeting and in early February, initiated a formal text amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. The matter is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Planning and Zoning Commission for April 26th and will be before the Council as a public hearing at an upcoming meeting. A major change that comes about as a result of this proposed amendment will be a requirement for off street parking for uses located within the CDC - Central Business District zoning district, whereas in the past, off street parking has not been required to be provided as a part of each individual development project. The proposed amendment provides for both minimum and maximum numbers of required parking spaces. ©2015 MFMER | slide-1 Five Year Plan Update DMCC Board Meeting April 27, 2017 Tim Siegfried Gail Eadie 67 ©2015 MFMER | slide-2 1991 Ordinance #2726 •1991 Ordinance #2726 Created Special District with overlay zoning of unique development standards & procedures for properties owned by Mayo within district boundaries District called “Medical Institutional Campus Special District” 2 Sub-districts Central Sub-district (Downtown) West Sub-district (St. Marys) •Special Documents Parking, transportation, materials handling, property ownership, site & floor areas •Special Process Adopted by the City Council after review & recommendation by the City Planning & Zoning Commission & City Council 68 ©2015 MFMER | slide-3 1.Medical Institutional Campus Special Districts 2.Mayo Property Ownership & Acreage 3.Building Square Footage 4.Employee Distribution 5.Parking & Vehicular Circulation 6.Mtls. Handling & Distribution, Subways & Docks 7.Utility Infrastructure 8.Urban Green Space 9.Potential Projects 10.Appendix 2016 - Five Year Plan Update Contents 69 ©2015 MFMER | slide-4 1.0 Special Medical District Boundaries 70 ©2015 MFMER | slide-5 Downtown District Boundaries (‘16) 71 ©2015 MFMER | slide-6 2.0 Mayo Property Ownership & Acreage 72 ©2015 MFMER | slide-7 Property Ownership 73 ©2015 MFMER | slide-8 Property Ownership 74 ©2015 MFMER | slide-9 3.0 Building Square Footage 75 ©2015 MFMER | slide-10 Building Square Footage 76 ©2015 MFMER | slide-11 Building Square Footage 77 ©2015 MFMER | slide-12 4.0 Mayo Employee Distribution 78 ©2015 MFMER | slide-13 Employee Distribution 79 ©2015 MFMER | slide-14 Employee Distribution 80 ©2015 MFMER | slide-15 Employee Distribution Summary 81 ©2015 MFMER | slide-16 5.0 Campus Parking / Vehicular Circulation 82 ©2015 MFMER | slide-17 Patient/Visitor Parking & Circulation 83 ©2015 MFMER | slide-18 Patient/Visitor Parking Totals 84 ©2015 MFMER | slide-19 Employee Parking, Shuttles & Circulation 85 ©2015 MFMER | slide-20 Employee Parking, Shuttles & Circulation 86 ©2015 MFMER | slide-21 Employee Parking Totals 87 ©2015 MFMER | slide-22 6.0 Materials Handling & Distribution, Subways & Service Docks 88 ©2015 MFMER | slide-23 Materials Handling & Distribution 89 ©2015 MFMER | slide-24 Materials Handling & Distribution 90 ©2015 MFMER | slide-25 7.0 Utility Infrastructure 91 ©2015 MFMER | slide-26 Utilities Infrastructure 92 ©2015 MFMER | slide-27 8.0 Urban Green Space 93 ©2015 MFMER | slide-28 Urban Green Space 94 ©2015 MFMER | slide-29 9.0 Potential Projects 95 ©2015 MFMER | slide-30 Potential Projects – Downtown Districts 96 ©2015 MFMER | slide-31 Potential Projects – Downtown Districts 97 ©2015 MFMER | slide-32 Potential Projects – MSC Special District 98 ©2015 MFMER | slide-33 Potential Projects – Outside Districts 99 ©2015 MFMER | slide-34 Questions? DMCC Board Meeting April 27, 2017 Tim Siegfried Gail Eadie 100 DRAFT 4/21/2017 101 DRAFT 8/24/2016 DMC Metrics Dashboard Goals Comprehensive Strategic Plan Create a comprehensive strategic plan with a compelling vision that harnesses the energy and creativity of the entire community. Attract Private Investment Leverage the public investment to attract more than $5 billion in private investment to Rochester and the region. Create Jobs & Generate Tax Revenue Strengthen the local economy. Become the Destination for Health & Wellness Achieve the highest quality patient, companion, visitor, employee, and resident experience, now and in the future. Destination Medical Center Destination Medical Center (DMC) is a one-of-a-kind, $5.6 billion economic development initiative in Rochester, Minnesota. It is the largest public-private partnership in state history, designed to position Minnesota as a global center for the highest quality medical care and to generate high-value jobs, new tax revenue, and businesses. The DMC Development plan was adopted in April 2015 and the Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency (DMC EDA) was formed to provide the staffing and services to support the Destination Medical Center Corporation and to implement the DMC Development plan, working with the City of Rochester. DMC Mission With Mayo Clinic at its heart, the Destination Medical Center (DMC) initiative is the catalyst to position Rochester, Minnesota as the world’s premier destination for health and wellness; attracting people, investment opportunities, and jobs to America’s City for Health and supporting the economic growth of Minnesota, its bioscience sector, and beyond. DMC Metrics Dashboard: Year 2 The DMC EDA has created the DMC Metrics Dashboard to follow a set of indicators that will demonstrate the success of the mission and vision of the DMC initiative. The 2015 DMC Metrics Dashboard provides baseline data from which to measure annual indicator changes. DMC EDA retained Wilder Research on the creation and data population of the DMC Metrics Dashboard. About the Dashboard The DMC Metrics Dashboard uses a set of goals, outcomes, and indicators to showcase the impact that the DMC initiative has on the DMC District, the City of Rochester, and the State of Minnesota over time. Goals: Five goals of the DMC Development Plan, which have been consolidated into four dashboard goals for ease of data collection and reporting, are the foundation of the DMC Metrics Dashboard. Outcomes: Quantifiable results that will demonstrate the achievement of the DMC goals. Indicators: Reliable data sources that will illustrate realization of the outcomes. DMC Metrics Dashboard 2017 1 2 3 4 DRAFT 4/21/2017 102 Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 GeographyBaseline Baseline Data Source Outcome: Rochester-area citizens are informed and engaged in on-going DMC planning DMC Hosted Meetings and Events – – 48 51 City of Rochester, DMC Newsletter Readership – 1,439 1,770 1,963 Local, State, Presentations by DMC Staff and Ambassadors 210 188 126 109 City of Rochester, Engagement Via Social Media and Web TBD TBD 39,200 105,791 Local, State, (Facebook & Twitter followers, website visitors) Media Stories that mention DMC – – 157 522 Local, State, Outcome: Government officials are informed and engaged in on-going DMC planning Meetings with Rochester City Council, County Commissioners and other State Agency and Officials - - - 55 Minnesota Comprehensive Strategic Plan Create a comprehensive strategic plan with a compelling vision that harnesses the energy and creativity of the entire community 1GOAL DMCC Board, Community Leaders, Market Rochester, Prototyping, Saint Marys Place open house, Ribbon Cuttings 5,200 Facebook followers, 3,127 twitter followers and 97,464 website visitors Attract Private Investment Leverage the public investment to attract more than $5 billion in private investment to Rochester and the region 2GOAL Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography Outcome: Public support will be used to leverage more than $5.0B of Private Investors in DMC over time Private Investment (annual amount) $10.3 M $54.5 M $87.6 M $145.3 M DMC District/Mayo Outcome: $585.0 Million in contributions from the state and local governments over 20 years City of Rochester Contribution $9.85 M 1.7 M DMC District Outcome: Entrepreneurial activity increases Number of Business Establishments in Discovery Square Subdistrict – – – TBD DMC District Patent Filings by Mayo – 111 141 139 Olmsted County Local news, State wide news, National news, International news 22. 22. 22. 22. 22. 22. 22. 19. 20. 23. Region, State, National Region, State, National National, International National, International National, International Open rate is apx 36.5%. Industry average is 22.6%. City of the Whole, Events, Minnesota Public Transit Conference, World Medicine Tourism Conference ect. Data Source DRAFT 4/21/2017 DMC Metrics Dashboard 2017 103 Baseline Outcome: Impactful Real Estate development will increase in DMC district Health & Bio-Tech (square feet) – – 9.6 M TBD DMC District +Mayo Retail & Office (square feet) TBD TBD 15.4 M TBD City of Rochester Hotel (keys) 5,270 5,419 5,706 5,621 DMC District Residential (units) TBD TBD 46,231 TBD City of Rochester Outcome: New businesses are established in each DMC district Chamber Business Members – – 1,495 1,511 Greater Rochester Area New Business Establishments – – – TBD City of Rochester 112K Bio Business + Mayo 9,513,389 (as of 2011 5 year plan) Chamber of Commerce (95% of businesses are in Olmsted county) Create Jobs and Generate Tax Revenue Create approximately 30,000 new jobs, with workforce development strategies that support that growth. 3GOAL Outcome: Create approximately 30,000 new jobs in the Rochester area over 20 years Total Employment 2.7 M 2.73 M 2.77 M TBD Minnesota 92,442 92,298 93,912 TBD Olmsted County 86,347 86,053 87,474 TBD City of Rochester 37,585 36,823 TBD TBD DMC District Employment in Healthcare and Social Services 446,773 454,495 462,856 TBD Minnesota 40,681 40,266 41,216 TBD Olmsted County 40,247 39,830 40,808 TBD City of Rochester 30,398 29,837 TBD TBD DMC District Employment in Educational Services 218,394 218,950 221,721 TBD Minnesota 4,926 5,122 5,283 TBD Olmsted County 4,064 4,225 4,356 TBD City of Rochester 245 TBD TBD TBD DMC District Employment in Leisure and Hospitality 265,991 269,441 273,270 TBD Minnesota 8,083 8,309 8,697 TBD Olmsted County 7,609 7,799 8,208 TBD City of Rochester 2,193 2,138 TBD TBD DMC District Employment in Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 136,775 141,831 146,070 TBD Minnesota 1,632 1,558 1,478 TBD Olmsted County 1,532 1,460 1,379 TBD City of Rochester 500 469 TBD TBD DMC District Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography 19. 19. 9. 19. 21. 22. 1. 2. 16. 3. 1. 2. 16. 3. 1. 2. 16. 3. 1. 2. 16. 3. 1. 2. 16. 3. Data Source Data Source DRAFT 4/21/2017 104 Outcome: Generate approximately $7.5 billion in new net tax revenue over 35 years State Tax Revenues $15.3 B TBD TBD TBD Minnesota County Tax Revenues $606 M TBD TBD TBD Olmsted County City Tax Revenues TBD TBD TBD TBD City of Rochester School District Tax Revenues – – – – City of Rochester Become the Destination for Health & Wellness Achieve the highest quality patient, companion, visitor, employee, and resident experience, now and in the future 4GOAL Outcome: More people visit Rochester Annual Total of Hotel Stays (rooms booked) 1.2 M 1.23 M 1.29 M 1.31 M City of Rochester Average Hotel Occupancy (percent of available rooms booked) 62.4% 62.1% 61.9% 62.6% City of Rochester Number of Rooms Available to Rent 5,272 5,419 5,706 5,621 City of Rochester Number of Convention Center Events 335 367 274 262 City of Rochester Number of Convention Center Attendees 337,752 303,087 288,603 295,000 City of Rochester Number of “National Patients” 116,751 115,964 117,993 119,506 DMC District Baseline 7. 8. 7. 8. 7. 8. 7. 8. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. Data Source Outcome: Create approximately 30,000 new jobs in the Rochester area over 20 years Employment in Construction 107,364 114,180 121,729 TBD Minnesota 3,154 3,363 3,488 TBD Olmsted County 2,212 2,301 2,362 TBD City of Rochester 226 228 TBD TBD DMC District Construction MBE Goals – – – – DMC District Established Business With Satellite Offices – – – – DMC District Number of Higher Education Students (2 year and 4 year institutions) 10,963 11,086 TBD TBD City of Rochester Number of Workforce Development Programs – – 12 12 City of Rochester Programs: RochesterWorks, Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce, DEED, SMIF, SE MN Together, J2G, CEDA Education Minnesota Department of Revenue Minnesota Department of Revenue (National: Patients from outside of a 120 mile radius) Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography 1. 2. 16. 3. 22. 22. 4. 5. 6. 22. 23. Data Source DRAFT 4/21/2017 105 Outcome: Increase recreational and leisure opportunities Arts and Culture Events 698 790 893 782 City of Rochester Arts and Culture Event Attendees 466,212 358,156 494,376 367,000 City of Rochester Sporting Events 72 73 80 81 City of Rochester Sporting Event Attendees 112,100 118,900 114,550 135,000 City of Rochester Outdoor Recreation: Number of Parks – – – 130 City of Rochester – – – TBD DMC District Outdoor Recreation: Park Acreage – – – 4,360 City of Rochester – – – TBD DMC District Outdoor Cafes in the DMC District – – 25 25 DMC District 9. 9. 9. 9. 10. 10. 22. 11. 12. Data Source Outcome: Create a healthier environment for residents, patients, and visitors Obesity Rate 28% – 28% – Olmsted County Diabetes Rate 12.9% 13.1% TBD TBD Olmsted County Vaccination Rate (Childhood Vaccination Series) 82% 82% TBD TBD Olmsted County Number of Park & Rec Activities (or programs) – – – 83 City of Rochester Number Participating in Park and Rec Activities – – – 1.9 M City of Rochester Bike trails/road supported bike lanes (miles) – – – 132 City of Rochester Percentage of Days Air Quality is “Good” 70% 77% 80% TBD Olmsted County Energy from Renewable Hydro Sources (Mega Watt Hours) 12,947 12,749 12,835 TBD City of Rochester Energy from Renewable Photovoltaic Sources: 24 33 56 TBD City of Rochester Net Metering Customers Energy from Renewable Wind Sources: 0.003 0.003 0.003 TBD City of Rochester Net Metering Customers Outcome: History is protected Individual Properties on the National Register – – – 13 City of Rochester within the City of Rochester Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography 11. 12. 11. 12. 10. 10. 13. 14. 13. 14. 13. 14. 13. 14. 19. 19. 11. 12. DRAFT 4/21/2017 106 Data Source Proportion of Residents With a Commute Time of Less Than 30 Minutes 69.3% 68.4% 68.2% TBD Minnesota 85.9% 87.4% 87.3% TBD Olmsted County 87.4% 90.6% 89% TBD City of Rochester Transit System Ridership 1.71 M 1.67 M 1.7 M 1.69 M City of Rochester Paratransit Ridership 39,288 41,897 45,062 46,635 City of Rochester Transit Weekday Operation Run Time (hours per day) – – 12.5 12.5 City of Rochester Outcome: Housing options are affordable for all ranges of incomes Share of Households Paying Less Than 30% of Their Income for Housing 71.6% 71.7% 73% TBD Minnesota 76% 76.5% 78.9% TBD Olmsted County 75.9% 74.7% 77.5% TBD City of Rochester Share of Homeowners Paying Less Than 30% of Their Income for Housing 78.8% 79.2% 80.5% TBD Minnesota 82.9% 84.6% 86.9% TBD Olmsted County 84.9% 84.5% 87.6% TBD City of Rochester Share of Renters Paying Less Than 30% of Their Income for Housing 52.3% 51.7% 53.5% TBD Minnesota 54.4% 53.7% 54% TBD Olmsted County 53.5% 52.3% 52.1% TBD City of Rochester Sources: 1. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, 2. Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages, 3. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, 4. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, 5. National Center for Education Statistics, 6. United States Department of Education, 7. Minnesota Department of Revenue, 8. Property Tax Division, 9. Rochester MN Convention and Visitor’s Bureau, 10. Rochester Parks and Recreation, 11. Olmsted Community Health Needs Assessment 2013, 12. Olmsted County Community Health Needs Assessment 2016, 13. Us Department of Energy, 14. Rochester Public Utilities, 15. Minnesota Historical Society, 16. U.S. Census Bureau, 17. Decennial Census, 18. American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 19. City of Rochester, 20. Rochester Area Economic Development, Inc., 21. Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce, MN, 22. Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency, 23. Mayo Clinic, 24. Rochester Public Transit Key: – Data was not found TBD To Be Determined Outcome: Improved transportation system Indicator 2013 2014 2015 2016 Geography 16. 18. 16. 18. 16. 18. 16. 18. 24. 24. 24. DRAFT 4/21/2017 107 23% 62% 15% Minnesota Population By Age -2015 0-17 18-64 65+ 25% 61% 14% Olmsted County Population By Age -2015 0-17 18-64 65+ 25% 61% 14% City of Rochester Population By Age -2015 0-17 18-64 65+ 10% 57% 33% DMC District Population By Age -2014 0-17 18-64 65+ 80.9% 1.0% 4.7% 5.8% 1.5% 2.8% 5.1% Minnesota -Ethnicity 2015 White (non-hispanic) American Indian Asian Black Some Other Race Two or More Races Hispanic (of any race)* 82.0% 0.2% 5.9% 5.1% 0.8% 2.4% 4.6% Olmsted County -Ethnicity 2015 White (non-hispanic) American Indian Asian Black Some Other Race Two or More Races Hispanic (of any race)* 77.6% 0.3%7.4% 6.6% 0.9% 2.8%5.6% City of Rochester -Ethnicity 2015 White (non-hispanic) American Indian Asian Black Some Other Race Two or More Races Hispanic (of any race)* 70.1%0.6% 9.8% 8.9% 1.2% 2.9% 8.1% DMC District -Ethnicity 2015 White (non-hispanic) American Indian Asian Black Some Other Race Two or More Races Hispanic (of any race)* Population Demographics Ethnicity Demographics Context Data DRAFT 4/21/2017 108 17.7% 21.4% 32.9% 28.0% Minnesota -Household Income 2015 Less than $24,999 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or more 16.3% 18.4% 33.2% 32.2% Olmsted County -Household Income 2015 Less than $24,999 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or more 18.1% 19.3% 33.3% 29.3% City of Rochester -Household Income 2015 Less than $24,999 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or more 40.8% 24.0% 21.0% 14.2% DMC District -Household Income 2015 Less than $24,999 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $99,999 $100,000 or more 7.2% 25.4% 32.7% 22.9% 11.8% Minnesota -Educational Attainment 2015 Less than high school graduate High school graduate (includes equivalency) Some college or associate's degree Bachelor's degree Graduate or professional degree 5.7% 20.0% 31.2% 23.0% 20.1% Olmsted County -Educational Attainment 2015 Less than high school graduate High school graduate (includes equivalency) Some college or associate's degree Bachelor's degree Graduate or professional degree 6.4% 18.6% 29.8% 22.7% 22.5% City of Rochester -Educational Attainment 2015 Less than high school graduate High school graduate (includes equivalency) Some college or associate's degree Bachelor's degree Graduate or professional degree 13.3% 19.7% 22.9% 19.1% 25.0% DMC District -Educational Attainment 2015 Less than high school graduate High school graduate (includes equivalency) Some college or associate's degree Bachelor's degree Graduate or professional degree Household Income Distribution Educational Attainment Distribution Context Data DRAFT 4/21/2017 109 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 Population Poverty Levels 2012-2015 Minnesota Olmsted County City of Rochester DMC District 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Unemployment Rate 2012-2015 Minnesota Olmsted County City of Rochester DMC District Context Data DRAFT 4/21/2017 110 Marketing Metrics To: DMCC Board of Directors From: DMC EDA Staff Date: April 20, 2017 Destination Medical Center (DMC) Marketing Plan Objectives •Build awareness, gain national attention •Demonstrate continued momentum •Drive traffic to the DMC website •Build interest in life sciences and real estate developers/investor audiences 2017 Marketing Plan Overview •Digital Media o Ad banners, eNewsletters, sponsorships in trade publisher verticals prior to and during events 8 to 12 events for life science and healthcare space 4 to 5 events in investor/developer space •Public Radio o National 13-week program with MPR (Science Friday) and 26-week program with Innovation HUB starting in March o Continue program with MPR news and information network but scale back slightly when DMC national ad runs concurrently •Delta SKY magazine o 6 columns in March – November issues •Regional Sponsorships o 3 to 5 opportunities focusing on building/investment, start-ups and healthcare •Paid Google Search o Ensure “Destination Medical Center” is front and center when people search “DMC” o Promote targeted content within DMC website •Social Media Strategy o Increase traffic to the DMC website o Increase attendance for events and public forums o Increase community engagement with DMC and the Economic Development Agency (ED Metric Highlights: Q1 2017 National Media Partner Publications Reach Impressions STAT News 33,100 eNewsletter subscribers, 2 insertions/month (6 eNewsletters) 186,458 CELL Press Online banners & eNewsletters ads in 11 digital properties 768,537 Nature Publications Online banners & eNewsletter ads in 4 publications 261, 313 FierceBiotech Online banners & eNewletter ads 1,587,130 SitoMobile Mobile banners 2,265,569 TOTAL 5,069,007 111 DMC Website: Q1 2016 compared to Q1 2017 DMC website traffic has nearly tripled from Q1 2016 to Q1 2017. More than 80% of visits (n=26,216) to the website in 2017 came from outside of the Rochester area compared with 65% (n=8,697) in 2016. 112 The diversity of the top 15 cities outside of Rochester that are visiting the DMC website indicate that the marketing campaign to increase national awareness is working. Without these targeted efforts, it would be much less likely we would see organic traffic from cities around the nation. The primary referral source (other than directly typing www.dmc.mn) is Facebook where DMC shares blogs, events, media mentions, and more. This indicates that people are both following DMC on Facebook and actively engaging with the content DMC is sharing on the platform. National Traffic – Top 15 Cities 113 Relationship Management • 41 meetings with private investors/developers in Q1. • 14 speaking engagements with life science, community engagement and real estate audiences in Q1. Opportunities for Q1 and remainder of 2017: • The 2017 Marketing Plan will test publications and use performance data to determine next quarter’s plan and media partners. Examples: • We will change out two media partners used in Q1 with the goal of achieving stronger results. • We will add real estate media partners. • Begin event sponsorship/networking opportunity portion of the plan. • Continue to regularly feature audience-specific blogs. Enhance traffic by boosting targeted DMC blogs on social networks. • Develop lead generation landing pages specific to priority audience segments. (i.e. developer, investor etc.) • Leverage customer relationship management (CRM) tool to capture website leads for future business engagement and tracking. • Continue to incorporate keywords into blogs to increase search engine optimization (SEO). 114 115 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank 116 TO: Jim Bier, Treasurer Kathleen Lamb, Attorney FR: Dale Martinson, Assistant Treasurer Date: April 19, 2017 RE: March 2017 Financial Budget Summary The attached summary for March reflects expenditures to date totaling $347,856 of the 2017 budget of $3,224,870. The total remaining 2017 budget represents 89% of the original budget remaining with 9 months (75%) of the year remaining. In the DMCC direct costs section, the $23,219 of expenditures in March represents corporate attorney fees and a small interest charge. The DMC EDA costs are billed both through Master Application for Payments (MAPs) for outside contractors and through working capital loan advances for the EDA payroll and other operational expenses. DMC EDA costs through March of 2017 totaled $308,800 and results in a remaining EDA budget of 88%. Details of the contract payments including remaining contract commitments can be found on the 2nd and 3rd page of the summary as provided by the DMC EDA. An additional MAP request was submitted in April for March expenses in the amount of $77,582. These costs are not reflected in the totals of the March report. The 4th page of this summary now reflects DMCC approved CIP project costs that are being implemented by the City. Total 2017 capital expenditures of $1,006,850 primarily represents transit studies underway as well as architectural service on the Heart of the City project. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. 117 Destination Medical Center Corporation Financial Budget Summary March 2017 2017 Approved Curent Month March 2017 Amount Percent Approved Budget March 2017 YTD Remaining Remaining General Administrative Expenses 31,200 2 2,748 28,452 91% Professional Services 404,500 23,217 23,309 381,191 94% Insurance and Bonds 20,000 12,998 7,002 35% City Support Expenses 150,000 ‐ ‐ 150,000 100% Subtotal DMCC 605,700 23,219 39,056 566,644 94% Third Party Costs ‐ DMC EDA * Payroll, Staff, Administration & Benefits‐EDA 645,120 44,421 116,236 528,884 82% Operating Expenses 20,445 47,323 (47,323) ‐54% Operational Costs ‐ Contracted 88,000 6,560 6,560 81,440 11% Economic Development Outreach & Support 751,000 43,765 44,265 706,735 94% Professional Services 890,740 38,784 94,416 796,324 89% Miscellaneous Expenses 244,310 244,310 100% Subtotal EDA 2,619,170 153,976 308,800 2,310,370 88% Total DMCC 2016 3,224,870 177,195 347,856 2,877,014 89% * Note: An additional EDA MAP request for March Expenses totalling $77,582.02 outstanding DMCC Working Capital Note 1,000 as of 3/31/2017 was to be paid in April.EDA Working Capital Note 50,000 118 119 120 DMCC Projects Managed by the City of Rochester As of March 31, 2017 YTD Expenditures Project Budget Life To Date Expenditures DMC Projects (BU# 8600) 8611C- - Sn/S12AvSW/NW<2StSW>2StNW 2,850,000.00 8,190.37 8612C- - WZmbrRvrSn/SRlfLin<CookPk>CCDr 989.17 950,000.00 21,003.17 8613C- - ChateauTheatrePre-OccupancyM&O 17,270.94 686,800.00 136,745.56 8614C- - DMCTransit&InfrastrctrPgrmMgmt 86,279.71 1,100,000.00 709,372.89 8617C- - Broadway @ Center Parking Ramp 10,500,000.00 8618C- - SharedParkngStudy&PrgmDevlpmnt 188,004.15 1,811,854.00 639,837.98 8620C- - City Loop Plan 61,786.13 959,938.00 227,362.11 8621C- - Transit Circulator Study 153,046.08 1,991,532.00 511,497.08 8623C- - DMCC Street Use Study 409,576.24 2,867,708.00 969,244.69 8624C- - ChateauTheatreBldgImprov/Purch 22,019.69 6,651,618.51 8625C- - Heart of the City 58,581.09 598,940.00 230,086.26 8626C- - Sn/SUpsize1Av&3AvSE<4StS>1StN 9,296.63 2,500,000.00 49,616.31 Total DMC Projects (BU# 8600) Grand Total 1,006,849.83 26,816,772.00 10,154,574.93 121