HomeMy WebLinkAboutDMCC Resolution No. 149-2024 (Approving Downtown Property Preservation Program to Address Public Infrastructure Projects within the City of Rochester’s Downtown Commercial Historic District, and approving Amendments to the 2024 Five Year Capital Improveme
MN 1030644.1
DESTINATION MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
RESOLUTION NO. 149-2024
Approving Downtown Property Preservation Program to Address Public Infrastructure
Projects within the City of Rochester’s Downtown Commercial Historic District, and
approving Amendments to the 2024 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
The following Resolution was offered by R.T. Rybak, seconded by Douglas M. Baker, Jr.
BACKGROUND RECITALS
A. The Destination Medical Center Corporation (“DMCC”) established five long-
term goals for the Destination Medical Center (“DMC”) initiative, including creating a
comprehensive and strategic plan, new jobs, tax revenues, and achieving the highest quality
patient, companion, visitor, employee, and resident experience.
B. The DMCC has long recognized the important role of historic preservation to
achieve these goals. The Development Plan adopted by the DMCC on April 23, 2015, as
amended (the “Development Plan”) recommended strategies and programs to encourage
preservation efforts: “The preservation of historic landmarks and districts is an important part
of a City’s historic fabric. . . . As the DMC implementation process moves forward, we
recommend the EDA work with federal agencies, state agencies and local organizations to evolve
strategies and programs to incent historic preservation [in the] DMC District.”
C. On January 22, 2024, the City of Rochester (the “City”) established a downtown
commercial historic district of thirty-two properties (the “Commercial Historic District”) located
within the development district boundaries as adopted in the Development Plan (the
“Development District”).
D. By correspondence to the DMCC dated May 16, 2024, and attached hereto as
Exhibit A, staff from the City and the Destination Medical Center Economic Development
Agency (the “EDA”) recommend establishing a downtown property preservation program (the
“Program”). The Program would provide an application and general state infrastructure aid
funding process for public infrastructure projects within the Commercial Historic District.
E. Under the recommended Program:
1. The City and the EDA staff will establish an application process and deadlines;
2. Each eligible project is subject to specific approval by the DMCC and the City;
3. The maximum amount of funding is $500,000 per property (according to the
property identification number) within the Commercial Historic District;
4. Multiple applications by one property identification number are permitted, subject
to the maximum amount of funding above;
MN 1030644.1
5. General state infrastructure aid (Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.47) funds
approved by the DMCC and the City will not exceed fifty percent of any eligible
project expenditure; and
6. Funding will remain available until the earlier of December 31, 2029 or action by
the DMCC and the City, in accordance with the statutes.
F. The Program will require each applicant to demonstrate that the proposed project:
1. Satisfies the definition of a “public infrastructure project” under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.40, subdivision 11;
2. Lies within the Development District and is defined as a “contributing property”
within the Commercial Historic District;
3. Is consistent with the Development Plan;
4. Achieves a capital improvement that is intended to be a permanent asset of the
Commercial Historic District; and
5. Satisfies the statutory requirements, including prevailing wages, American-made
structural steel, as well as local requirements, such as sustainable building
standard, women- and minority-owned construction contacting, and workforce
development (collectively, “Program Requirements”).
G. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.40, subdivision 11, defines “public infrastructure
project” as “a project financed in part or in whole with public money in order to support the
medical business entity's development plans, as identified in the DMCC development plan” and
expressly includes, among other items, the ability to
(2) demolish, repair, or rehabilitate buildings; . . . .
(4) install, construct, or reconstruct elements of public infrastructure required to support
the overall development of the destination medical center development district including
but not limited to: . . . utilities systems and related facilities; . . . streetscape
improvements; drainage systems; sewer and water systems; subgrade structures and
associated improvements; landscaping; facade construction and restoration; design and
predesign, including architectural, engineering, and similar services; . . . construction
costs, including all materials and supplies; wayfinding and signage; community
engagement; . . . and other components of community infrastructure;
(5) acquire, construct or reconstruct, and equip . . .other facilities to encourage intermodal
transportation and public transit; [and]
(6) install, construct or reconstruct, furnish, and equip . . . facilities to promote tourism
and hospitality, conferencing and conventions. . . .
H. The DMCC Board approved the 2024 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (the
“2024 CIP”) on September 28, 2023 and approved the projects set forth in the first year of the
2024 CIP as public infrastructure projects within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section
469.40, subdivision 11, and consistent with the Development Plan. Final approval of each of the
MN 1030644.1
capital projects remained subject to a later specific approval by the DMCC upon final
determination of scope, costs, and availability of funds. The 2024 CIP was later approved by the
City.
I. The 2024 CIP provided funding for the Strategic Redevelopment Fund, which was
first approved in the 2021 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Staff has informed the DMCC
that a portion of the funds from the Strategic Redevelopment Fund is available for reallocation.
As set forth in Exhibit A, attached, staff from the City and the EDA request that the DMCC
amend the 2024 CIP (1) to reallocate funds up to $5,000,000 from the Strategic Redevelopment
Fund to the Program; and (2) to approve the Program, subject to later specific approval of each
project by the DMCC and the City upon final determination of scope, costs, satisfaction of
statutory criteria, and availability of funds.
J. On April 27, 2017, the DMCC approved Resolution No. 51-2017, which requires
additional review of projects upon material deviation from the approvals granted, to ensure that
“as-built” projects are consistent with approvals that have been granted.
RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Destination Medical Center
Corporation Board of Directors, that the DMCC approves the creation of the Downtown Property
Preservation Program, subject to approval by the City, under the terms and conditions set forth
in this resolution as consistent with the Development Plan, satisfying the components of a public
infrastructure project within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.40, subdivision 11,
and located within the Development District, all subject to final approval by the DMCC and the
City of each proposed project under the Program upon final determination of scope, costs,
availability of funds, and statutory criteria.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the DMCC amends the 2024 CIP by reallocating
funds reserved for the Strategic Redevelopment Fund, to the Program, in an amount not-to-
exceed $5,000,000, subject to approval by the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the expenditure of funds for the Program, the
City and EDA must comply with the following:
1. Expenditures for the Program must satisfy the terms and conditions of this
Resolution, including, but not limited to, the parameters of the Program
and the Program Requirements as set forth in the Recitals, which are
incorporated herein.
2. Provide certification that the Program expenditures comply with this
Resolution and statutory requirements.
3. Provide annual reports to the DMCC Board concerning Program updates,
expenditures, metrics to evaluate the success of the Program, and
recommendations concerning future funding in the capital improvement
plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that DMCC Resolution No. 51-2017 is incorporated
fully herein by reference.
MN 1030644.1
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chair or the Treasurer of the DMCC is
authorized to transmit this Resolution to the City of Rochester, and to take such actions as are
necessary and appropriate to effectuate the findings and approvals of this Resolution.
The question was on the adoption of the Resolution and there were 8 YEAS and 0
NAYS, as follows:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Destination Medical Center Corporation
YEA NAY OTHER
Douglas M. Baker, Jr. X ____ ______
James R. Campbell X ____ ______
Brooke Carlson X ____ ______
Kim Norton X ____ ______
R.T. Rybak X ____ ______
Mark Thein X ____ ______
Pamela Wheelock X ____ ______
Paul D. Williams X ____ ______
RESOLUTION ADOPTED on May 23, 2024.
ATTEST: _____________________________
Pamela Wheelock, Chair
Destination Medical Center Corporation
2
Historic District DMC Funding
To : DMCC Board of Directors
From: DMC EDA
Date: May 16, 2024
Request of the board of directors:
To designate the Downtown Historic District as public infrastructure and advances a
program of financial support of up to $5 million for eligible capital improvements to
properties within the district.
Overview:
With direction for the DMCC board, DMC EDA staff have worked in collaboration with the
DMC EDA board, DMCC legal counsel, the City of Rochester, and other downtown
stakeholders, to conduct further due diligence regarding a downtown property support
program, including program parameters, funding application process, and goals. Staff
continue to evaluate similar programs, including the DMC EDA-administered Main Street
Economic Revitalization Program and the Rochester Downtown Alliance Facade
Improvement Grant Program, as well as past historic property investments, to affirm the
demonstrated need and applicability of this proposed program. Additional detail will be
provided for the board discussion.
The Rochester City Council, after considerable deliberation, established a Downtown
Historic District, a 32-property district (28 contributing buildings).
After significant evaluation, DMC EDA staff recommend directing support to the newly
established downtown historic district. The framework for this approach is described in
detail in the attached m emo.
In summary:
1.Support for property rehabilitation, repair, and reuse within the Downtown Historic
District is consistent with the DMC enabling legislation;
2.Investment in historic properties is contemplated in the DMC Development Plan;
3.A program which supports and incentivizes private investment in properties will
advance DMC goals related to job growth, capital investment, tax base enhancement,
and visitor/resident experience;
4.Resources of such a program were noted when the 2024 CIP budget was established
under the line-item Strategic Redevelopment;
5.These resources will complement other programs and strategies to ensure a successful
downtown historic district;
6.The impact of this program is predictable and measurable; progress will be reported
annually.
EXHIBIT A
May 16, 2024
TO: DMC Corp. Board of Directors
FROM: Destination Medical Center Economic Development Agency
RE: Historic District Analysis and Report
Background
On February 1, 2024, the DMCC board of directors directed the DMC EDA to prepare, and present at a
future DMCC board meeting, parameters and goals for a potential downtown property support
program.
In response to this direction, we engaged in due diligence informed by the following questions:
I.Under the DMC Law, can the DMCC approve the establishment of and funding for a downtown
property support program?
II.Given DMC’s development plan goals, should the DMCC approve the establishment of and
funding for a downtown property support program?
We have summarized our findings regarding each of these questions below. Following that, we
describe proposed program parameters and a recommended course of action for board consideration.
Due Diligence Analysis
I.Under the DMC Law, can the DMCC approve the establishment of and funding for a downtown
property support program?
A proposed project, public or private, may only receive DMC funding after three determinations
are made by the DMCC and Rochester City Council: first, that the proposed project is within the
DMC development district; second, that the proposed project meets one or more of the
definitions of “public infrastructure project” under the DMC law; and, third, that the proposed
project is consistent with the DMC Development Plan.
The DMC law prescribes that DMC funding may be approved for several uses, including:
A.Acquire real property and other assets associated with the real property;
B.Demolish, repair, or rehabilitate buildings;
C.Remediate…buildings as required to prepare the property for acquisition or development;
D.Install, construct, or reconstruct elements of public infrastructure required to support the
overall development of the destination medical center development district including, but
not limited to…streetscape improvements…landscaping, façade construction and
restoration, wayfinding and signage, and other components of community infrastructure;
E.Make related site improvements including, without limitation, excavation, earth retention,
soil stabilization and correction, and site improvements to support the destination medical
center development district.
II.Given DMC’s development plan goals, should the DMCC approve the establishment of and
funding for a downtown property support program?
As we evaluated possible variations of a downtown property support program, the alignment
between the City of Rochester’s designation of a Downtown Commercial Historic District and
the DMC development plan increased the viability of a “historic property” funding program.
In January 2024, the Rochester City Council designated a downtown commercial historic district
comprised of thirty-two properties:
The DMC development plan recognizes the importance of historic preservation and suggests
possible means of support. From the plan:
“The preservation of historic landmarks and districts is an important part of a City’s historic
fabric. The City of Rochester is currently undertaking a study to better define policies and
ordinances around the City’s cultural assets. The DMC Master Plan (Section 6.0) and
Infrastructure Plan (Section 8.0) recognize this study is underway and assumes the Development
Plan will (defer) to City ordinances on this matter.
As the DMC implementation process moves forward, we recommend the EDA work with federal
agencies, state agencies and local organizations to evolve strategies and programs to incent
historic preservation (in the) DMC District. A preliminary list of strategies that may be considered
includes:
A.Work with City and local organizations to identify historic assets, policies and ordinances
that recognize an economic and cultural balance between development and
preservation. Recommend policies and funding guidelines to support implementation of
the plan.
B.Identify federal, state and other resources such as Historic Tax Credits (HTC’s) that may
assist developers and private investors in preservation of key assets.
C.Assist developers and private investors in applications for grants and/or funding
proposals.”
In addition to the alignment between the City-designated historic district and the direction
provided in the DMC development plan, several other considerations bolstered the case for a
historic district support program:
A.A designated historic district provides an initial project evaluation framework that can
ensure that investments become permanent community assets, whether in a district-wide
investment like streetscape enhancement or a property-specific capital improvement.
B.A historic district support program can serve as an additional “tool” in the DMC toolbox,
alongside prior and ongoing investments in public realm; district energy; streets and
sewers; infrastructure supportive of specific workforce housing, bio-med-tech; bus rapid
transit; area planning; and other growth-driven needs.
C.Approving funds for investment in the historic district creates another promotional
incentive to include in DMC retail, dining, and entertainment business recruitment and
retention strategies.
Proposed Program
Following our due diligence analysis, we considered possible program parameters with a goal to address
the following questions and issue a recommended course of action:
I.What would qualify for DMC funding?
II.What legal requirements and policy standards need to be considered?
III.How much funding should be available for a proposed project?
IV.How would DMC direct funding to historic properties?
V.What would an application intake, review, consideration, and oversight process look like?
VI.How much DMC funding should be designated for this program?
Addressing these questions has involved numerous informal discussions between DMC EDA and City
officials, property owners, community non-profit organizations, business owner-operators, downtown
residents, and others. The insights gleaned from these conversations have been invaluable and have
informed our recommended programmatic approach.
Our advisory recommendations related to the resolution of each of the above questions are below.
I.What would qualify for DMC funding?
We recommend that any project considered for DMC funding meet the following criteria:
A.Meet the DMC statutory definition of “public infrastructure project”.
B.A proposed project must result in a capital improvement that is intended to be a permanent
asset of the downtown historic district. Temporary or non-fixed assets would not be eligible
for DMC funding.
C.That the proposed project occur at a contributing property of the current downtown
commercial historic district.
We further recommend that, for reporting and program evaluation purposes, the board require
that projects be proposed and presented in four categories of investment:
A.Adaptive Reuse: Conversion of property use, such as office to retail or restaurant, or
renovating vacant second-story space for housing or commerce, etc..
B.Building System Upgrades: HVAC, electrical, plumbing, etc.
C.Building Safety and Preservation: Exterior envelope sealing, accessibility improvements, etc.
D.Code Modernization: Improvements made to legacied properties in relation to ADA or
other regulatory compliance, preparation of reuse, future reinvestment, sale, etc.
II.What legal requirements and policy standards need to be considered?
The DMC law requires that all projects financed with DMC funds must pay prevailing wage to
project contracting teams and, if applicable, utilize American-made structural steel. These legal
requirements must apply to any project approved under a historic district support program.
Additionally, the DMCC and Rochester City Council have adopted local policies related to
sustainable building standards and women- and minority-owner construction contracting and
workforce requirements. Unless waived or modified by the DMCC and City Council, these
policies would be applied to any project approved under a historic district support program.
III.How much funding should be available for a proposed project?
In addition to the program eligibility requirements described above, we recommend that
proposed project funding requests should be subject to funding requirements:
A.DMC funding covers fifty percent of any eligible expenditure.\
B.DMC funding be limited to a maximum of $500,000 per property, as determined by the
parcel identification number (PIN) of the eligible properties in the current City of Rochester
Downtown Commercial Historic District.
C.To allow property owners and tenants maximum opportunity to prioritize capital
investments, funding may be applied for and received more than once, subject to the
$500,000 maximum described above.
D.To align historic district construction activity with other major downtown improvements,
including Link BRT and Bold. Forward. Unbound. in Rochester., program funding will remain
available for request through December 31, 2029 or until rescinded by action of the DMCC.
To determine the total amount of funding to recommend for designation to the proposed
historic district support program, we evaluated a selection of capital improvements made to
downtown historic properties in recent years. This evaluation reflected input provided by
property owners and tenants, who reported to us that building improvements are often reliant
on business cash flow, construction seasonality or contractor availability, supply chain
dependencies, and other determinants. The evaluated improvements involved expenditures in
all of the evaluation categories proposed above: adaptive reuse, building system upgrades,
building safety and preservation, and code modernization.
The evaluation provided us with an order-of-magnitude valuation of capital improvements
across time, project, and property types.
IV.How would DMC direct funding to historic properties?
In determining a recommended course of action for the administration of this proposed historic
district support program, we kept several considerations top-of-mind:
A.The review and approval process and practices should preserve all of the DMC-related
authorities and prerogatives currently held by the DMCC and Rochester City Council.
B.For each proposed project, DMC EDA and City staff should review each funding request for
program eligibility and provide a recommendation to the DMCC and City Council.
C.As it has for all prior DMC-funded capital projects, the City of Rochester would manage the
financial administration of the program, including ensuring project funding and
documentation meets audit and reporting standards. These administrative responsibilities
may result in additional staff costs for the City; if so, the City may request reimbursement of
these costs by the DMCC.
V.What would a proposed funding request intake, review, consideration, and oversight process
look like?
If this program is approved, we recommend creating a stand-alone, cost-free funding request
portal on the DMC website. The portal would collect proposed project details, including
location, description, and cost, and inform the applicant of any applicable DMC legal and policy
project requirements. Staff contact information would be provided to all applicants, as well as
an invitation to meet with staff to answer applicant questions.
The funding request portal would always remain open but, in order to provide time for staff
review and board material preparation, closing dates will be established ahead of each regular
DMCC board of directors meeting, where staff intend to present proposed projects.
For example, if this program is approved by the DMCC on May 23, 2024 and by the Rochester
City Council on June 3, 2024, we anticipate being able to open the funding request portal by July
1, 2024 and follow the timeline below:
A.August 15, 2024: Application closing date for September 2024 DMCC consideration
B.Sept. 12, 2024:EDA board proposed project review.
C.Sept. 26, 2024:DMCC board meeting + proposed project consideration
D.Oct. 7, 2024:City Council meeting + proposed project consideration
This intake, review, and consideration cycle would be repeated prior to every regular DMCC
board of directors meeting until program conclusion. Additionally, we recommend providing
regular reports on the status of approved projects and the disposition of program funds.
VI.How much DMC funding should be designated for this program?
In full consideration of our due diligence analysis, recommended program eligibility and funding
requirements, and review of select historic property investments, we recommend that the
DMCC and Rochester City Council designate up to $5 million for qualifying public infrastructure
improvements within the City of Rochester Downtown Commercial Historic District, subject to
annual CIP authorization and the program eligibility and funding requirements described in this
memorandum and the associated board resolution. We further recommend that the funding be
sourced from the DMC General State Infrastructure Aid (GSIA) previously approved as “Strategic
Redevelopment” funding in the 2024 DMC Capital Improvement Program.