HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/05/1970_RegularCITY OF - ROCHESTER
Council Agenda.- 70 -13
Meetina'#16 October 5 1970
Regular .2:00 P. M.
Call/to Order a -Lid A
pproval of Minutes.
B. He 4tifigls '(7:30 P. Y,
1. Proposed- Assessments for -Part- I o f Impr.ovemeqts in 19th -St-reet N. W. and
Blodk.-.4, Valhalla 4th Subdivision
2.� Pro:osed Assessments for Graditgand-Surfac-ng of the Mall Road.and 16th Street.
S.. W. in Apache Mall
3.' Propos*e.d Assessments for Sewer and Water Extension in Apache Mall
.4. Proposed -Assessments for. Improvements in Rocky Creek'Drive between T.H. 63 and
Rocky Creek Subdivision.'
5. 'Proposed Assessin.ents for Peck's'Hills 3rd"Subdivision
7; 6 Proposed Assessments for Water Tower and Trunk Line S. W. Servi'ce Area
Proposed Assessmedts for Improvements in Kellogg Hills Subdivision
X_!_ ts for Improvements in Elton Hil . is Drive N. W from 3rd Avenue'
Proposed Assessmie nL
'th L-e of V' ifialla-Subdi-vii
N.W' to the Nor in a
cD j�, 9. Applica;ion. for. . the. Temporary Use o , f.Mayo Civic Auditorium' Parkin . g Lot fo
Parkina Travel Trailers
10. Application for -Conditional Use for -Lots 1. 2 and 16, Block 2, Graham's A�dition
for -an -Off Street Parking Lot
C Organizational- Buisiness,�
1._� Council is to adjourn and Meet, with the Human Relations Commissiou.' at 4:00 P.M.
in Room*4
D. Letters and Petitions
E. Reports and -Recoiinmendations
1. Adm. Asst. - Adoption o IF Tax Levy and Budc'ret
2. Adm.. Asst. - Request to' Locate United Fund Porta Panels
3. Adm.`-Asst. Request to Cop -duct a Fund Raisins:Drive'-
.4. Adm. Asst. Request to Hang a Banner for Miss Rochester.Pageant
5. City Clerk -Licenses and Bonds
6. -Engineer - Tabulation of Bids for'sanitary sewer extens-ion-to'Libby's
.7. �Engine er'- Tabulation of Bids for construction of 9tfi St. S.E.-from 3rd Ave. S.E.
to-R.R.
8, Engineer - Advertise for Bids for sanitary sewer in Nbxthw-ood 3rd Subdivision
9'. Engineer - Construction Contract for Meadow Park Subdivision.,
10. Engineer - Sewer and Water Extension to Northstar Subdivision
111. Engineer - Cost'Information on Sewer,and Water Extension to R.E.A. Property
12.. Engineer - Removal of Parking on 2nd Avenue S.E. in 1600,block-
13.. Engineer - Change of Parking Regulations near Coffman -Central School
C)
141. Finan�ce' Assignment of Securities
15.,- Plan'n-ing Application for approval.of final plat of Repiat of 'Lot 4-Block
Silver Acres Subdiv-Lision
16. Planning Application for approval of�General Development Plan for Summit Square
-.Planning.- Application fo' Approval of the Preliminary Plat of Summit Ist Subdiv.
17. r
A-0
A/i, 108. Planning, -'Petition to vacate 5th St. S.E. from West line.of 1st Ave6S.E. to 100 f t JR
-Finance Approval of Bills
Resolutions and'Ordinances
Resolutions' and Ordinances for the 10/5/70 meeting
G. Items Tabled
1. Petition to Anriek R.E.A.- P r op e r t
H. other Business
M r C I I N 10-5-70
REQUEST FOR.-COU-�ICILACTIQI D Al E
ATING T:!
�OR [GIN, D E P
,AGENDA. SEC'TION:
Hearings
City Clerk
EM:
I.-T � M D ESCRI-PTION;l
PREPARED B Y.,
Proposed Assessments - Part.1
-of. Improvements 19 th - S t-. N. V.
N 01—
& Bliock. 4, Va lha. 1.1a
4 th, Subd.. A:
E. Reiter!
This -is a :hea_ring,".:to consider-,the�propose"d
assessments.for-the
following loca 1. imi)rovement:'
"Paxt*zA of street. 9
rad ing and -surfacing, 'sanitary..
--sewerj- watermain, -
-storm -sewer and .'service - 6 nne t1on
0 c S..
e
in . .1 Oth -S t r e : t, N.- -W,.
and'Block.A,..Valhalla 4 th- Sub-
diVi' ion.�'
..The 'total cost of,'this..project
s- $
I' _36�736.54'of which $24 165.60
is to be- presently -.-assessed- t6.`benef'
-property- $1Z 082--.78 is'::--
to- -,be deferi� 88 16� i'
6 d` - -a' d $4 s
n.,
t o be. 'pai - by. the
a
-Suggested Motion-:.:-.
a lf�'�he Council" decides.
to accept the proposed: adsess�mehts',
motion' adopting. the prepared
resolution accepting the as ses sments-. would
be inorder�
J
COUT-IGIL ACTIOlf -1 by:
Second by:' to
I . ----.-OJ-;��----:--.—.. I � ' "' - -1
. - . -s E . . . ..... ' ' `0 1 - I
0. L. 3 lz 9 10 - 14 1. 2 11 .2, 5
IS &0 15 13..
ELT.O.N t'Hi L L S 7 12 2
VA-
6 66 30 1
13 or
3
5 ST.
ui 4- 17 19
it, ... LU
34 21 20
2 2
2
37
ov
IA Is 19 2 52
25
17 38
-OURTH 14
30
51 41
v L L
42 0:
13 9 �o
33 7 YA,.
16 17
6 A- 6 4
5 4 12
Ir/ 3
4 13 10 9 2 14 6 4 23
4 4,AF?K CRT. 2 s 2
10 .2 7 2. -X;
W,
2
4\
_6
7
9
14
-N. W
'7
411
NY
L "M
L..J
'20'
6
UBT-,
6 1/2. S; T
s
uj
6
7
8 10
-z:r-
vi
4 5 6 116
w dSL'�GTO)
��G
Fc 11
��l 5 .5
rl I-
J
H:F I �H I's 29
LU
uj S.E
> 2— -AT
< uj . " -
< E.C.. R T
26 F r4�' �111 RE
< 6i� >
DL
\L-L L� :r- <
Motion
b y.,
Second
b Y.
to
tyl L L I I IN V-7 10-5-70
_:R _QU_F:S7- FO 11'.'T 00, UM,a L ACM DA7 E
AGENDA' SEC.T I ON: 0 R I G 1. N A T I N G
DEPT
Hearings -City Clerk
EM: I T�E M D ESC.'R I r.T I ON; PREPAREDI.By.
Proposed As.sessmerits Sewer & Water Extensions in.Apache Mall,
N 0.3 E. Reiter
'Th P 'assessments for the following
-is is. a'h aring- t.o. dons-ider the ropose'd
.1-oda-1 imprbvbment:�.
Sanitary sewer and'wa-ter-extensions inithe Apache Mall Area.."
. 7% -The. to.ta 1 cost of this prd-j'6ct is -$99,055..79 of which $97,435.90 is.. to
"b 'ed to.th a" d by the
e. - a s s e s.s e -ben-ef ited*- property and $1,619.'89 to be p i
'.Water,Department f or the c6s't of oVersizing the. wa e rma in.
...puggeg-ted.Motion:
'If 'the Council decides to acce*pt thd-propo�ed'as-sessments,
a.motion,adop-ting the...prepared resolution accepting t h 6- assessments would
be in order.
COUN, CIL
ACT1071:
mc.lion
by:----
Second'
by-.
to
E U E,ST
R .4
M E'ET ING
F 0 R: 'COUNCI 0A1E: 10-9-7.0
1 ACTION
-ORIGINATING DEP'T:'
:A GENDA SEC-TION:.
H arings
City Clerk
EM: -
I.TE M 0 ESCR IPT 101N.
PREPA -RE-D,BY:
ProposeA ..Assessments Water
ToT
wer a nd Tiunk.Line S W.. Service
-A re6
[E.- Reitgr,
-hearin
This is, a - to -consider
the propo'ed. a-ssessm.en,.ts-, for -the
s
following loca I I
Improvement:,
u
Water t3 oy:e r 'and Tr nk'
line, S outhwest servi c - e . .-a re . a-
-IIA)"
4 The, total cost of . this-, project-
is $281,71§.-53 of which, $6*0,227.7.0
is t -be-presently assessed,
s
$Z2,768 51 paid V the- Water Dept,.
Y
b ov*ersizing the.wa�ermain
T
and"$ 98',723.12 to be deferred
S.ugge9ted Motion:
If the Cou'cil dec i des to
.. n. '. .
'cce pt thepropose d.as ses sme n
a tl I . -
. .
�a motion adopting --the ptepared.resolution
- , -. .
acdepting�the a-ssessments
would be in -order.
COUHM.ACTIONN. Motion by:
Second b y: t 01:
A
'10
9
p 17
BLOC10
NoPTHERlj
13
29
K
2
2 1�
HILL
.�-13 17
T.
23
1 1 5 29 1 z
16
14- - 17 23 ST. N.E Ld
6 25 2 is > WINSTCN. CHURCHILL
12 - SCHO
2 2
r7j�' iGk 7- -N H N
S RTHERN HEIGH
10 DO
OR H 14 15 22 ST. N.E.
4 .1
9 4 H 1-10 N LL
LL I/vvO
22 con'ST. N. E 14 > uj .,T
3
15 2 13 <
16 co > 2
17 A, H.
141 �-31N, 6
L -1 1
2 co ST. N.E. 2 66
Ld - 3
z 15. tj
3 >
< NORTHERP
11 1 1 0 9 151 1 �NJHJ �5*� 121 . 2
113 19, ST. N.E.
1 5 6 1 .4
13
2 )RTWOOD P H- IQ
3 14
K LLO Go i �OUR;f SI A
10 5
5' LANE
T
LAI 2 1
4 6 -11
9 2-
17 ST. N.
11 66' 11 1-4 6� 14 T 5
L) e5' 7 66
2 FRANK B. KELLOGG — Ld
cn 3: 2 9,
61/2 N 9
'JUNIOR HIGH 2: uj 4
im 5. ID DGE S
COD 4
Ld
is
z —JX, 7-
0 > ORD'NA'NCE -NC
U) —9, Lj 3 3 u . j 3 18 19 40 14— .
> w 1 39 03 3 1 Z �f 14
< ZKI TA 2� 1 6 vr— 93
S S 8 16 T. r �--
r
IVI'LL. I Oil �.2
T
Ott. 5, 1970
nDATE:._
REQU7 .-FOR.I.-COUNCIL A
'ORIGINATING D E P I T:
GENDA SECTION:
PLAM, -TING
EARINGS
RED BY:
ITEM D.ESCRIPTIQN-.� PREPAI
E M:' Application f or. Approval. 6-f -.a Use- of
the Mayo Civic Auditorium -Parking Lot -for Parking,Travel Trailers
hed wi th . Aud i t rium -F!, - e_- n t C; -
N-.0. 9
Assotia 0
'7
Sep tember 24, 1970
City Planning and Zoning Co mm ission Recommendation:
On September 23,,, 1970 the City Planning and Zoning.-Commissip"n considered.the.above
described 'application. ' We 'find that many i of the shows playin . a, at ". the May . o C . i . v - ic-
Auditorium have performers who live in a trave"l'traile'r type unit that also serves,
as a aressinc� room. The Zoning Ordinance doe . s,*not Ch." -o- t right -and
_.allow'su. -A-use U
as'a r . esult the Park Board has requested that the_parking'�lot area be-:desicna:ted as
-the area to be used for such trailer parking as a temporary -use.' ..The area. propbsed-_
.,for this!use is-.quit.e.removed_.from any,"adjoining r�side'ntial areas, and the usual
leng�h o� stay-is.only a matter of .3 -.4 days.
Based on these. findi.ngs 1.7 e re' c o mr.-ie n d that,* the�. parking lot.area..east of- the auditorium
be de8i-nated-�as-a'parking'area-for travel trailer . unit8-as'sociated . wi�'h auditorium.,
-tat this use be on a temporary use -basis for -'a 12 month period'under the.
shows,'.and tl
provisions.of Paragraph 61.032.2 of the Zoning Ordinance'.'.
Council Action Needed,
-1. The City Clerk should publish."a legal notice of hearifi�g; in. the:Rochester �Post
Bulletin not'later than Friday, September'25,_101-70.- The-Park.toatd should
also.be notified.'
2. Following the hearing if the Council decides to proceed, 'it should instruct
the� City Attorney to prepare a resolution that. -can be.adopted.
Attached..
1. City Planning Department report
DISTRIBUTION:
1. ft ty Clerk
2. City,'Planning Department.
F A
e ��WZK —
C er� U Nj-:. M' otion by-' Second by:� !6-:"
ADVISORY'PLANLNTNG REPORT ON THEAPPLICATION FOR,,'APPPIOVAL OF A TEMPORARY USEOF
!-.,TIIE MAYO, CIVIC AUDITORIUM RMIKING LOT FOR PARKING TRAVEL TP,%ILERS, WIT�t AUDITOR-
TS
IUM'EVEN
'We have received the: a�b-ove appliqation.and w e*,.f ind the following:-
td 0 Co
1. ..--"Name of.Petitia'ner.-City of*R6chester, Boa f Park mmissioners..
2., v -.-Reas on. f o r - P 6 t i t i on:' To make the Mayo Park parking lot available'
.-for
parking of .mobile homes, camping trailers and-
Motor'homes during the Mayo Civic Auditorium:
r h
-Rec eation S ow.'
:exhibits such as- the'Sports'.and
3. -2epartmenEal.Revi�_w:. ..Seel -attached. report, from the..Building & Safety -Department.
City Planning Depattment:
General:
a
The applicant is.,requesti"a 'a t lot for
ng u,horization' to use M,�yo Park p�irkfn,,
....,a temporary trailer coach park during. Mayo Civic Auditorium -exhibits, such. -
As Sports,and Recreation shows, -.circuses etc.. The -Planning Department-.
proposes we use Article 61,-.Paragraph 61.0322 Temporar'' Structures and
Uses in granting this petition.
_61.0322 Temporary Structures and Uses: The Boar - d may 'authorize the.tempo ' rary
D urp
use of a.structure or premise inany istrict f6r'a p ose or use.
t -at r
h -does not confoim� to'the regulations prescribed elsewhere in this
-Dis a t such
Ordinantd.for the trict in which.it is located, provided 'th�
i:,.use be.of a temporary nature-and'does not involve the- erection of a.
6ubstanEial structure. A Zonin'g'Cer't',ificdte for such. use shall be
-_:granted 'in -the, form -of a temporary and' revocable,permit, for 'not more'
than -a twelve (1.2) month pei:iod, subject to such conditiohs.as will
safeguard the 'public.health,.safety,.conveuiencEi and general -welfare.
This..we fee-1 would be more appropriate,.iftasmuch as this' park would only be
'used in and for occasions mentioned in-the.appli.cation'which would be about
3 t.o'. 4 times''each year. Then this would be a yearly: application; b.tit at
this time'Paragraph 61 .0322 is on a yearly -basis.
'Conclusion,
Since,these-occasions -only occur dbout 3 to 4 times each year and.are only fot
5 days duration at most.it is felt 'that.Article 61, Paragraph 61.0322 would
suffice rather than granting a permit- for a,full-fledged.trailer,coath ark
p
which would have. to be set up in -lots and utilities requited-, etc.".
B ased on the. -above, werecommend'thaE a temporary and'revocable permit to be'
.
issued for a 2 months - .7hich can upon application and r' -e renewed.
period'..i eview b
a
I:t I IN
-L ACTI -r E Oct` 5 197Q
':;REQ5 UE-ST: FOR COUNM r,-] DA
ORIGINATING D E P T
-T I ON:
AGENDA SEC
HEMJNGS PLANNIVIG
rEM.1 I-TEM DESC-RiPTIO.N;-Applicatidn for-App.roval of a C6nditional'Use' PREPARED BY:
'ddi*ti-' ' 'for an Off"
to use Lots 1 -2- �and 16,, -Block 2, 'Graham-'
N.O. s on
Street.Parkina Lot
September .24, 1970
City -Planning and*Zoning Commission Recommendation:.
n n
On 5e�p er.23, 1970-the City Planning a'd'Zonin"g Commission co sideted the above
-ing lot -can be permitted as.
described application.' We find that"an accessory park
a conditional transitional us in the.R-1 District, when 8uch-district adjoins'a
B or'M-Dis'trict.-
.$ince this property..adjoins.,existing residential uses immediately to.the'south and
west there should:be..some protectio'n.aff.orded these people'as a part'.of this
application.
Based on.these findings we 'recommend that this application be -granted approval with
the'suggestioh that -.'.the. zapplica:nt-do:what he feels he.can'to provide's�ome''screening,
protection for the.adjoining properties, as p ointed out in the Plannin�7 Department
report.
Council Action Needed:
1. The.City Clerk sho.uld publish a legal notic*e of hearing in the'Pos.t-Bu'lletin.
by fiot.-later than.Friday,.Se mber 25, 1970. A written notice to all property
.p-teT
owners should besent-no later than-September_30, 1970.
-c'eed. with th
2. Followina the -hearing, if, the'Couhci.1 chooses.to pro is matter it
should instruct the. -City Attorney to'prepdre a,resolution that -can be adopted.'.
Attached:
I. Copy of City.Planning Department- report.
.2. Copy:of list of property owners' to 'be notified
DISTRUBUTION:
l.. Cit�y Clerk
.2. City Planning Department.
0 U N C i L J-11 C 7 1 01H mot ion by: -
7
S V
Aj
3C�0-0
I C,3.
7-
4 9i.
8 25"
�-o 5.
, 0
Af
N
6
eo,
-1
r
so 65'
0.,/.
as./- 1�45 50
78 7'
ioll
r 120-.0 .-iG4.2
5'-UTILI-rY
A S E Ml E N
ol
ol -
>
LE
<
-I 00t;
BLOCK.
%
F A R NPI. H . M, E - !1N. C.
LOTS k.2 IS --SLOCK
GIRA I AM, S 2 d A D D 1 T U` -NI
(gg
L N'D C-
U.N L A'
.S EEC T i ONI -11, T*t/--%!--N V.I
N70
'A i
R.G. IMcGHIE -TTS INC
C-.G F. N R S
V N N E S
L
c iD R
E —S--
2-10- 6�) FR 0 C E R
OATE
1W
COMMITTEE ON URBAN
ENVIRONMENT
Ro6m_22 ' Summit Building
717 3rd.Avenue S.E.,
Phone 282-4924
288-4925
UP
6.
- L
6,
"September 15. 1970
City Planning and- Zoning Commission
Room 22, Summit Building
717 3rd Avenue-S.E.
Rochester, Minnesota-55901
RE: APPLICATION FOR A C01,TDITIONIAL USE-TO.PERIXIT AN ACCESSORY-OFFSTREET
PARKING LOT TO BE,BUILT IN -AN R-1 DISTRI T.
CT THAT.ADJOINS A B-3 DISTRIC
-ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 14TH STREET S,.W.
;.Gentlemen:
The Committee.'on Urban' Environment has considered the'above desc�ibed
--application for a conditional us�e permit a,t 18 14th..,S-treet S.W. We
recommend that the application be approved subject t the following.
0
--conditions:
1. ..That -..the applicant.agree to plant tre6s-at'thirty five (35)
1oot i.htervals-along-and within- thEi. sou�h'and west perimeter.
--of the property.
2. That -the applicant agree not to seek future access to Highway
6 3 from said prop erty
3.;, That.the applicant agree.to plant in.d maintain one (1) tree for
..every ten (10). Parking spaces,, and that these trees be -disbursed
0
-the par -king lot in acco rda nce wi th a'plan.to be pre-
tfiroughout
sented by' the applicant..
4.-:-That a screening fence bt hedge be'constructed along the south*
and west line of this property.
-.5...- The trees -be planted along the west line of-U.S. '63 similar to-
-the south.
what is in place to
Respettfull *-submitted
y
L A
Mr's. John R., Hilli Chairman
Committee on Urban Environment
RCK/ds'.
R' E S 0 L U T 1.0 N
BE. IT,".RESOLVEED -by the Common Councdl of -the City of Rochester,.
-Olmsted County, Minnesota that' the following -sums of money be levied for,
the current year, -.,'col lect ible- in i971.," �upo'n the taxab-le property in 'said.
City of. Rochester,. for the following pur oses:
General —Fund 9,67,901
PERA 4TICA 172',500
Fire R.0-lief -3 mills
Police-Relief,�- 3 mills,
Library . 2.18,503
Sewer Utility 30,000
Equipment Revolving: 143,987
Capital. Improvements. 450
Debt Service .265',004
Be it further.resolved. that the City Clerkjs hereby.iPstructed
to transmit a certified copy of thi� resolution'to the Count' Auditor of
y
Olmsted County, Minnesota.
Passed and adopted by the Common Council of.the.City of
Rochester, Minnesota, at a meeting thereof held this .5th day of
October, A. D. 1970.
President of said Common.Council
Attest:
City Clerk.
Approved -this day of October, A D, 1970.
Mayor of said City
Seal.'of the City of
Rochester, Minnesota
R.E-S O.L_.0 T 1 0 N
BE-IT',RESOLVED 'that the annual budget of* the City.of Rochest-
er,
Minnesota, fo"r' the fiscal January 1 1971, which has been
y
submitted-b� th-e. several, -departments and modified and a:pproved by the
-City Council is.-h6reby adopted; -the totals of said budget and the..major
'divisions ther&of being -as. fo 11 ows.:
REVENUE AVAILABLE
Gen6ral.Property Taxes $4,H5,267
License.s and.Permits. _187,250
Finps,.Forfeits and Penalties 215,000
Use' of -Money and Property .164�758
Intergovernmental Revenues. JJ1272.1445
Charges for Services 904J.'764
Spi�cial Assessments- 455,000
�Jiscellaheous- Reven . ues 2 40-054
Prior 'year .. Revenues 5-33,66.7�
Total- Revenues
EXPENDITURE
Appropriations
Employee -Services $4,346,178
Other -Current E)�penses .'-2, 216 305
Capital -Outlay 267 205
Capital Improvements 2,908,400-
Debt Service :1,377,117
Total*Appropriations
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED -That the Y�odified,_approved.and adopted
copy matkedt"Adopted 1-971 Budget"be placed on file in the City.Clerk's
office., and'that effective January 1, 1971 the Director.of Finance -Treasurer -
is. hereby directed -to cause the appropriate dccounting--entries to..be madee
e
-in the books of the City.�.
q
'REQ,UEST.F0R,'C0U7v4C1L ACTION 12"
AGEN.DA-SECTION: O-RIGINATING DEPT:
Reports and Recommendations'. �:Adm.-Assistant
!ITEM DESCUPTION;.- PREPARED BY.
NO. R6quest'to conduct, a -Fund' Ra . ising Drive -Disable' eterans XJ Andre.
d: V'
The following request is Thade.by the'Americ�in.Disabled,Veterans-
to conduct.zin ann'ual-fund raising drive in Rochester on October
10th. The Council has granted approval in prior years.
To the Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the Common Council-
-City of Rochester, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
The Disabl ed American -Veterans, Dept. 'of Minnesota, Inc.,
respectfully re Ission to conduct a fu'n-d-raising
quest your permi
drive in thedowntown-area and shopp'ing-centdrs in the Ci ' ty of
Rochester on October 10th,-and will.,be selling,poster's possibly
on -October 7th. This. is the annual.fotget-me-not dr1v.e which has
been conducted in the past.
Respectfully,
hn
R
Dept. Adjutant
Ps Service Bldg.
Room 3,'�_ Veteran
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
IMNCIL A.0 T 10 IN: motion, by- Second, byi; to.,
dZI
:)n -to hang'the banner
I he'reby make request for permissi(
'Daytons*and,woolworths on- . B -a the
between roadv7 y for
r 18 through 24, 1970 to advertise the.
period Octobe..
Miss Rochester Pageant1% The said sign will be hung
by Triad Sign Co.
'Respectfully,
Bob,'Relitz.
Chairman of Mis hester.Pageant
Motion'by-.--
S e conJ
b y
t o
IA
-17, .1970.
Septa er,
5y Comp any
Libby I!cNleill L.Ib.
Att- Mr.-C.H. filiggett
�f.
1217 3rd A.vanue
Rochestari Xlmnesota 5590.1
0, 70
30' A.
3rd 'Lve an i ta ry
r E ension,
Dear Hr. 'Hu �-e t t
'raa Pl--'18 for exteiasion of- smitar, 3rd J.. Irm, 12th-
sc�mt in I Ive
S t. --S . E.,.- to 13th St. to, ze w, U11) by c7:41u ill. 47, 1 h b y. pl=t havc� 'been 7
VO,
r-o-mpletad mid lt)idg iiill-Ine received on (11 c t ob e r 5 th for i ts. construction-.
&-_quir�monts to mal.ritain ' thru traffic on, Trunk Highway 1452 (12th S t)
I -ive 'IeCe.m3ary to Specify Jack.." Undar the center 36 feet
v made it q �a condu#.
Of the ;)avement at c6nsidorablee cost abova the onien-trehch exdavatioa
d propo3ad in our pre
W.Uc:I wo "'wi. -liml-ary plahning last summer.
Cmu r cur ren s, t i rn, a for tha_ approved plan'is as follaws:
ruction Contract
Con s t
Enginee ring I
Project interest 6 Z' 747
Cos 1 ..$1-4,689-
..-Total Estimated
tima
La coils lder,�) !�� eU ove t1m Previous es ted costs, th e
Becaira this 4
U I. Y would want. your acceltance before' it contracted for and proceeded -with.
%, � P
this'project. I would suggo.st that we advin*� you of the actual !ad bid
when the bid3 are. received on Octeb;ar 5-Cla, aad- zvait yo-ur response before.
Proceeding to coat-inct t4is job.�
S -to ate t;,ie Citys previous position
At th i: timn- also T wish re i t:,-- r
CC., a t &Iis S'e-wer extea3ion- i�i- bain,, coas-tructed and connection to it will
be permitted only.for tile dischar,(ge of waste wator* from the "off a.eason"..
prqca�,sing fram Nove-mber to 'farch as o=11iled by.your co6pany re . presentatives
Previously.
Zha- data presented at. that, tima xid, previously When our recent plant
expmnsion was being desigaed a ra as fo 1 lows
page .2
T�fr- Huggett
17** 19'70'.
730.0 _gallo' a r
hour ove r 20 hour pariod dai'ly.
astl.:�Ztu-&' 4it T'�Cj )arts, i)"r
ml I" toii, -and- us,6endi,_d, solids
xpproximat;_,Iy 500' p m. -
3 Vie rincipal pro'duct ',717OU'L d be
b4ked bearls.
.4. -Anoth er 100D g illoas per day,
bf cooliVig w a to r W'oul� be
disch�Lri, n to , tilaz s I& orm s ewe r sys tem.
These - liTaintioas are n-ecess-ary
' f because
of -the,-itlability of our
t re ne t facilitie.1
Lzi n -to- h'ardie additional
h i gl 1 tran 'th iiidus trial
WaStes. Our prevIous Coil f 2 Ma, -Ices have -advised
.9
y6ur re'Present,
ative�3'
31so that'there is -110 '43V li tY o :A.
municipal treatr�--ent fatilitief3.
accep-tin- the suilrn%er pea and dorn pack was
C. —
tes o-, carrot, pe;61c wastes if
such should b e initiated.
.
A 1)lan of th-a. 3rd A'L%�a. extensi.on is
eaclosed for your IiJe.
Yours, truly
Nrms
-trong,
City
eacl.
Cc: J. Andre
L. Leach-
CAA:lz
a
JL
tA
Anmol.
F?
0
LOT I
N. E.
1 3d 27 66, 4 BLK I
LOT 46' J(
w 'i M LOT 1.
-2—Z z :3
U Lu BL 2 BLK 3
3
- Lij Lli LOT. 2
> cr
a-
13
13 - 14
ORDINANCE NO. 1510
15
Is
�,Y
22
f Me".
p 18 17
BLOC
NORTHEF?N
IvQ
2 . 8 K
29
is Z-
uj
ILL 27
ul 20 K I
cr
13 17
S'"
z
-5p
S,
231
z
3
ll� W52
? 19 > WINSTC
SCHOC
10 N.H.= Nc
10
OR 15 22 ST.
f
ate 0 ct ob ea 5, 1970
Job No 6 30 3- 1� 70
OVEIVE NIT
REPORT ON ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND MkSIBILITY OF LOCAL I�200:7� cu 59
-Honorable Mayor and C o �mz n Council
t er S U
qity �of. Roche&I Ifinne. o'a
-in-petition requesting sanit
Jk certcL a N- F_ to
Northstar Subdivision. Lot "I Blork I
referred to this 'off ice on -August 24, 1970 has been -examined, checked'and
found to be in proper orn.., and to be signed by ofsthe
50
owners of record representing
-at i n frontage 4.property. affected.by'.the maki 0. of the improvement which Is
perce nt
Petitioned.- The other 50% of owners are on. the West side 6f-3rd Ave. N.E.'-which-
is outside -of the Cit*
y'Limits.
The En,7 ine er s� report,that the improveme nt id feasible but the cost is
ab ove' normal be
cause he s nit q= seypr re2ues�ed is tb� bpLnning
C
which must be laid -deep, enough to permit f J'r t- P n 'i -ber b.33:E.
_kIture e S a t
s
north. A- Pajor part of the, cost -should be' deferred to �jzgnPi:t_i P-S Q the-M-J
A%
There is a deferre qRMP to e o f --th-e— IsTriink. R P T4
B lock- I Northstar Subdivision in the ount . of- _371,04
am (4-23' Acres @ ��?ja*
cre)
The. estimated. cost,.made without surveys or.j? ans is $
�r.i2e_ eXe
City.z
. t;s'�J/y
REPORT OF THE COIVETTEE
COI�Mitt-ee has considered the aboye project and
The P ub-11 c
Recommends, that a hearing be he h e x
W th
appointed as Engineers _'f o r this project to e plans and s2
prepar
r
'49, f!A_Kj:.be:t -recommp j that An kmn V hP n -r e) i i- v-ftq L-__An ssessed to -Lot I Rl%-1
of No.rths tar SuBdivision an'd D U._� b 1 �e� n -he t-
t
are to. be. lev'ied- on a-de'ferred b as'is: tQ ,-�6ttidr beiiefittirig propertie� not presently within
the City Limits-.
Paul-Ludowese Chairman
Committee
7. Darrel Strain
q
at -
DEPARTMENT -OF CITY ENGINEER
1 6b,2 4th '-Stre�t S.E.
Phone 288-431 6
:_�'C. A. ARMSTRONG, - City Engineer
MARK R:-GkAY, Director of. Maintenonc
Octobef 1,-.-1970
Publicj Works Committee
and Finance Committee
�ubject:' .'Proposed. RE
Annexation
(File f� 112 8)
Augus t 3rd- for cost - in f ormati on on
In response.to your request -of -
sanitary' sewer and watermain-extensions-that would be. necessary. to..-,
provide City sewer and water service to- the. -land -in --sections -4 &-5
Marion -Township which is -proposed f or..annexa..tion by. the Peoples
Cooperative Power Association'. I pre"se'rit the f ollowing :cost e-s timates
and comments:
The existing 12" sanitary sewer trunk line at.the Jun'ior'.-College
Could be.extended to.serve the west'portion of the proposed ahnexati6n
This extension would be approximately--4705 feet in'length. 'Its estimated.
cost is $71,465. 'It would-h-ave to be :installed, thru.preserrtly unplatted.
and undeveloped�land, which lies between the 'Junior College sit& and the
R.E;A. property. This extension would- s'erve'as-'-a trunk li - ne for approximately
180-acres north of Highway 14. The es.timated'Trunk Line assessment would
be approximately $400 per acrei Of ' th - is total acreage the k.E.-A. acreage
benefitted would be only 20 acres, or 11% of the total.' :Of the b'alance of
the 18.0 acres', approximateiy 100. acres is State -Of Minnesota l4nd:'� and 60,
acres is privately owned'.
The existing.12" watermain-at the Junior," College could also be extended.
across.the same,.State owned land east of the Junior College--.to.the R. E. A.
property. Its estimated cost is $58,107.: This -Trunk line cost could be-'
spreadagainst a proximately �90 acres that would- be bene-fitted--`1or a: rate
-p - I
of .$200 per acre.. The R.E.A. land benefit.ted-(all 43 acres' in -this instance)-
would.amount:to 15% of the total. Of the balance -of the 290 acres-,
approximately.180,acres is.State land, and 67 acres -privately owned.
I do not consider it economically feasible to expend this: amiount of
money at this.time for such a small.acreage as is represented by the R..E.A. -
tract, a -lone.
ut
Cl)
AV E.
7T
Co.
CD
-!,LnCA
C-1-5
S E
7
Lo
m
I
JIM
Z: " ' �' 4N:C' 10/5/70.
DAT E
AGEND�k, S,�C TION:
ORIGNA -T:.
tING
e o ts and Recommendations
Engineering,'.(Traf fic Divisi.0
C
ITE,M-.[),-5CRIPTION.:
PR�PA R Eb By
N 0,
Chan5ze of Parkina- Regulation's'neat Coffman-Centra 1% S6ho'ol*,. 'Jack' K.' D61aa
J,
Traffic Engineering- Recomm ndations'.
e
The'— tra f fi c - En �1-
g#eer#a Division reviewe'd:_the _�b b.-iie,, re que s t f ib'm` the Rochester
d
Public .Schools (see attached copy of.7reques t) nd avi t�e. f allowin
d6mments an
rec
oininenddtions on the - %To *items requested:
I.' Th :parkingalo)ag -4.th:...Ave'.- S.W'.. g6d�Ltall��pedking bas' -f6-W _P�rking limitations''
and -no.. metered pa"ki. is u' '"d.'n
r -. -Th . is se� ow f or -.employee t p arking'-,`9p rob-ab ly from
_ype
the -M�yo .-It'is o' U�r 0 ppLn"i on p - a iki n. g. f 6 r sch o 6 1 p. �i r o s es only.'could
not be enforced 'and shou"Id"not be 'a u t or i z' e d
Basea.:.on this We recommend -instead -that one, hotir..parking me�ters be'.installed on -
the West side 'of 4 th A-vd. S.W. betwee� 18 t -and' 2nd Street S'. T�i.
2_'. It..�LSreCOMMended tfiat.-th.6 -S.'Wi-'between 4th�and 6�h
Avenue, 6 th',�venue. from lst'Sti�eet'S`...W.: td..'Center-S tteet. and- Center 'S tieet between
5th and.6th..Avenue S.W.- be",revisedf-Tom..�.00 T.M..',"to 4:00,.P.M. as- requested. The
..parking on these stree, ts, -are. now prohibited from*7.:00 A-...M-. to:5-:00-P-�M'. on school
-only.. School is - out and tr'af fit. is.
days... bac'k'-'to.normal by.. 4 00". P..M. This- would'
..provide the school staff -addftional -*'rki . 'g' f or -meetings t h a t- r'e" ei - d-at th . is -time.
p a n
-been-
These-requests, and -recommendb:t ions -.h ave discLissed-, and -agreed'tb by- - the -*Po lice
Pep�artmedt 'and. Mr., Don Peterson of --Ro.dhester Public.Scho'ol§'.
-Mayor and Gdiuncil-,kction .]�ee'ded:
-.1. Adopt 'a -'Res olutlon - establishin'* a' 60
9 mi-ni.ite-metered: parking ;zpqe on'the.
Ang:str�eet:
fo, llox
Fourth Avenu6. Southwes t on thi�-Wes"t`.sidd- between ls''t Street- and 2r� 'Street.
2. -Amend S , ubsections .18"1 .33, 35.,- ajifd-- 13 4- 6f.*Section B of the'..Master. Parking'.
Resolution to read from 7:00 -X.M-. - tor AM P'. M.' ins tead,:of 7..: 00 -'A.M.7.,.to 5tO 0 T.M."..
Attachments: Map of Locat'i6n�-
-to
Letter'f rom' Mr. Kinde,t,-,Roches_*.Mr'Publ'IIc S�cl
C 0
1' 0 IIIQ
R FE QU E z F C
motiah
by:
by:
J_
to
W.
U) il '" . Fv - I - . ,
m P�
AVE. NIJI,
41e
1740v?:-
i is
4" VACATED I G N OV.65
C;, A X/ C* Q- IAI S; A IPl
--r7-7
I-[ Lill
rt_ - -
L —I— _J_
L-A I
I-J:
a Q v R 9 9 a mug a 9
/16,es - - E''S 4 - A VF7'- N. W.
4 AV W.:
3 .'AVE., S.M. .3 AV E- N W
V CAIED
4 J A Sk4
r
m
2 -AVE. SM. AVE. M M.i.
K U E SY F 0.?,R- C, 0 UNCE, I L A C Y - I iN. 0 c t 5 1970
D�7
AGENDA SECTION: -:.,. . __ _. . .- " . _., . 1,
ORIGINATING DE PT:
R�p*orl&--s, �and'., Re commi6nd at ions
Plannifig
TEM: ITE D ESGR I PT [ON. Applicatio'n.for approval 'of.. the Final Plat of PREPAR E D -BY.
the Replat of Lo� t .4. '-Block*. 3, 'Si .1 ve I r"Acres .1 S dbdivi'si.on
r-september 25,1910.
City,Planning Depar�tment Report:
On September 14,.1970',.an application was filed-with*the C"Ity-01 Rochester. for
approval of the above'described-f'
inal plat. 'We have check6d-with, the'. -other �agencies
.-to determine if there a -re' -any -problems connected with this plat. The major problem
that.wa's.pointed out:,by the City Engineer and the-Minneso 1-ta Highway Deap . rtment See
-atta.ched letters)' co'ncerned*the very,real possibility that a major portion of' the
.,land being re'pla-tt'd -T�ay to construct a fr L ee
e . wil - I be needed *for public right of-
-flowing.right turn"11off ramp%" from' U.S.'52 to.me.rge with west bound traffic on
.37th Street N.W�%�..
The -plat docum�nts'.!s submitted., - comply with the provisions of Ordinance No.'1558
_b
(Subdivision Ordinance) and*dre'in.a form that could e approved.., Howevi5r,-bas'ed
-loop to be located on'all,ot
-on thb,heed for an.'nte�rchange. a part of this property'.
w . e-recommend that. Council action on -this replat-be deferred until a--decision-has
been reached'by the Common Council, County -Bo
ard and Minnesota Highway Department.
on this proposed -interchange redesign.
Council Action Needed:
We did not'set. this matter for hearin&.by the C . ouncil because once the'hearing
C2
is held -the Council'has only 60-days to act, . on the *plat-unde:r the provisions"of-
.Para'raph.41.112 of Ordinance No.,-1558.- 'We felt that.the Council should '-ke
9 ma
the decision on when to set -the he'aring*in-this-case, so that the new in'
terchan-e
can be designed*and a decision- made,on procedure after,'that'..
Possibly'this 1-and will be aicquired'forrigh-t-of-�way purp . oses and -if so, 'then no
on the plat will be necessary.
If the Council- should decide to,proce.ed with this plat then it' should se't' 'a date
for a public hearing. A resolution will be needed to approve this plat.
Possibly it would be -des ' irable to discuss this ma�ter at the next Public.'Works-
Committee-meeting.
Attached:.
J. Copy' of. -letter from the City Engineer.
Copy of letter f rbin the Minnesota Highway Department.
3. Copy.of list of property, owners:to-be,notified when public hearing is.set.
�r, 0 U-Pl Ci L. A Clza- I G i --'� I motion Seco.ncl. b y -i_ to
Z
%
A
S -ATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
86X 6177
ROCHESTER, MINN. 55901
September 21
a ...,
Tom 0. Moore
City' Planning Director.
Room 222 S=it Building
717 3:�rd. Avenue. Southeast.
Rochestery-Mi-pne'sota. 55901
In reply refer to:-
Replat of lot 4y Bl�ock.3, Silver Acres S�,.bdivi si on
--Dear Mr. Moore:
'We have'revievied the -print of the proposed replat of the Silver'
-Acres Sub -division and offer the f ollovTj-nj,7 comments:,
e
-uncil the Olmsted County Board of''Commission rs2
The Rochester.City Cd tu i�
at -0 Minnesota hbv long felt'that 'sbmia fu, - re 'r rove -
and the St e of. U e 0
re
ments'will be required at-the,interchange'of T*H.. 52. and'37th St. et.*.
Northwe'st in order to'acdonmodate' the increasing'traffic' deman.ds xm-
-J that , area. 'It is".
sulting from'continued expansion of the'dit, in
e
felt that these improvements YTill be required ev ' n if - a major east":
west arterial is constructed at some.location north of�37tih Street -
in the future.
-uncil and Olmsted -Board of County.Commissioners
The Rochester -City Co
have both requested the Minnesota HighwV Department to prepare a
sired i��' interchein
preliminary layout showing 'the d6 rovements' dt the ge
-as made by letter dated'August-13�from.the City Engineer.,
This. request v,
We haN:e begun development of geometric sketches -as requested. Before.
any particular scheme for improvement can be considerdd to be a film
prop o sal 9 many . problems must be solved such -as agreement on a plani
cost -participation . etc. However' the first step �would be to secure
agreement by all -levels, of gove=ent on a preliminary plen. Therefore,
-coun
any sketches.prepared by us must be discussed slith t ' he city and ty
and can -be considered only. as possible - improveme��t- scheme�. at', this timea
A number of alternate layouts -are being develop e"d'a, All ifiblud.6�'-the'
construction of a loop in the northeast'qu,4drant of this interchag-,6,e
to,provide free -flow for the heavy.south-to west movement.. This naturally.
right, of vwrE�y in�this quadranu and.'
would require acquisition of additional
A:.signifipant area of
would affect the area of the proposed replat
o'one-half of th& totEo: 'EL-69; of . �he lot.
Lot 1 would be acquired; close-t
w
--y
ESSEX-
HIRAM'' E*
TJO7N R11, ......
E.
88
5 14
-0
21 2-3 32-9.6
-4js? ST NIX,'.
x
.............
. ..............
.........
.. .. ..........
X
X L; L IG 1.8 SS'::B'
,�L u y E.R E..--.-J:E N S E.,N.
cz
41
N R I S
ESTAT E
I N
C
LQUATION-.017. �401`1
A
S T. N.-W-, E ST .0 F'
IS
..THIS POINT
7 Von,
J*:� --------- Z
............ -X//,, UN -COMMITTED.
.............. .
.............
.............
x
...........................
':' I'
--ST. ANDREWS
m:
::;PRESSYTERIA �4.
CHURCK
...............
..........
..................
..........
.................
.............
............
TO -(J.S�. 8
jt�- G -L-E—b� R 44 Er
TO U.S. 52-1
:4-LAN;E'Y -N -3 E
TO.'. A 8 M PLANT
L.EGEN.D.
.1325.�7*
.........
.........
LYN D-ON a. DAVID. GESELLE R"3
S c.b le- In Feer.
300
AQQ
o
0
'A
SQU --RE
SUMMIT
-23 -14
'MY
W 1/4'.. -1/4 Sl�CPON 107-
�T�R`MINIUESOTA 19701-
ROCHE 3
Ali
Dcn,
CITY'..
-VA L I H,
G. --a J08.E P:HI'NF
ERWIN :_Izz ."A_ ____'pQCHESTER, NIINNIESOT
W, 'A .
c pr. �u, -j-L. Dat� Silbrllltt�,_i
F
R
7. ecozu
ADVISORY -PLANIMING REPORT 'O'LIT TIIF APPLICATION 'FOR APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF SUMIT SnUARF, LOCATED -I�'T THE SE-CTION 23-107:--14
We.have review.ed, -the '.A6ve,application and.find 'the follo;'.iincr:
1, Name o f -Pe�tit ioners Mr. EAWalth and ..Mrs. Josephine Walth.
12. -D e artmentall, Review,:. S ee attached report fromC the,'City En gineer.
.3.'City Plannifig_Depaftment�:
A General Development Plan should indicate the f ollowing,.
.,th' exis ting or proposdd.'zoning districts are of the land
1.- What.
t
in.. _qpes ion.
.2, What 'the 'present,.'zoning districts are for the lands su*rro'undi*
the
property.
.3. The, -.0 �e s intende'd for.the.property.
;d7
An. I e-a as to. -the street pattern that would best fit the terrain,
while' follow'ing, as close as possible,'the,Thorouchfare Plan and
Lan(I tse Plan.adopted by the City -.Council. A further consideration
-to ider the proposals embodied in t e V7
would b'e' cons h Gent-r-al-De*
elopment-Plan (Land Use and Thoroughfare -Plan as pre�pa'red'by -th e.
-sted T-ransT)ortati.on-Study.
Rdches-ter. Olm
5.' The'existing' and Propos.ed"str'e'et'pattern of surroui ding. properties.'
n
donclusion:
The General.Dev'elopment Plan. as submitted does not contain -n'
the ecessary,.in
formation to.evaluate it as an acceptable ori*unacceptable plan. The Pl . anning
Department is W'orking on a fairly -detailed plan for.'this area which'should be
ready f or review by the City Planning and' Zonin- Conmission at itis next
Operational Planning meeting on October 28, 1970. Until: this p.lan-'is completed',
that this application be tabled.
4
:4 e.- �_S e.p t 3, 19
-Dat .70
Planning and Zoning- Commi'ssion
C /0-' Plm- iin Diredtor
D'evelopment
Re I General Plan.
Aaae
::J
.--ii. Preliminar uare
�y Plat for Summit Sq
-Su
. Fit s t bdiv
In -reply. t6 your roquast for our' review
and co=ont.s'. on th6.. above natter,
-yi� submit'the f ol I culng
.-T -tin 'n r) t- q i d P r this q _Genpi�l__D_�irelnpment- -Plan: ipqAmll�b gs, i f
does not in any respect show the future' la'yout or use -.of 'the trac t
--in respect to a street sys-tem or "private use..
11. No objectlo�s to the plat provideA
it is not in conflict with the-
dey lopment 'o f th!e balan6e of this
tract.
stipulations in resoect to access
points. I believe:that these_,�pprC�VEd
-access points were supposed to be
for.public stteets..'
E:-. full
L N
-Y
j7 n
CIYY ENGINEER-�K, A.; Armstrong
64�i� c 19 7(
'UH t
RE* QUE ST FOR�,CQD ICH, A C Y I C) N
AGENDA S-EC,TION;- ORI&INATING DE-P,f:
RF,�PORTS A�, D R C, ()_�P TF7,TDATIONS PLAMOING
TEM.- ITEM DES-C-RIPTIO - N. -Application for Approval o fL the Preliminary P.R E, P �A�ID BY.
a
Plat Of Summit- Square. First Subdivision
/In
Sep.teralber 2-4, 1070
0
7
City Planning,an*d Zonlng- Commission RecommendAtion�
97' Cr
On S-eptember 23,: 1 -) the Cit�__Planhiri and Zoning Commission reviewed the
above described'appIication.' 'We f ind -this preliminary plat to be in atcord
with the recomme.nded General Development Plan of Summit Square -which is -also
under consideration by the Council at this -time. As pointed out in the Plan-
ning.T).epartment.ls,'report.tliere are several surveying and dimensioning 'problems
that need to--be-resolved atid c�orrtii� ted but the basic prelim -nary pla.t is
accep�able-witliout.*a.stre6t'alonp,, the -east s.ide-of.,the plat.
Basedjon these findings we recommend -that this preliminary"lat.be'granted
p
approval- subject ':to' tid-,inc, tare- of Items 1, 2',- 4, 5, 6,7 -and 8 as contained
in the attached Planning Departmen-t- report
Council Action L�Teed-ed:
1. This application.can be, -.approved -by 4 motion of the Council.
-Attached;
J.-Copy-of City Planning Department report
A_�V
DISTRIBUTION:
1. City Cl'erk.
y
Ci�y Planning Depar tment f ifte
HM, ACTICH: Motion by:'
by' to
Second
4 ml�
a 01
34
V I
Is
Si
OF
u ::. C.: T
1.413 P Z
'14
Pit
ajo
=om r
0
1. - - L I I — -'. .- ___; f.; /, * .. I.: /
m 10 - � m - " I - I
ca
JK
cnr �.fn
/*
41 M r
ivy
docum .. ent is im-a-ged-.to the -
'the previous
7t
b'est'q.uality poss-Iblef:
The ori'inal docum- ent is of very poor-
9
-quality-
Sca n. n e'd by 0 1 m ste d Co u''nty
Im.8,"ging Department-
ADVISORY PLA-NNING- REPORT ON THE APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE PRELI.,1INARY
1PLAT-OF SUi-L T SOUARE,FIRST SUBDIVISION
We'have review'-ed, the application for.appsKbval described above-, and we
f 414�': the f ollot_17ing -
L �.Xame.of 74��titioner:, Mr. 2. G.' 1,7,alth..,
-2'. -.'Depa--tmental Review. Set.attached report from the City Engineer.
-Planning,Department:
-3. Cit)r
We have reviewed the application for-approval-of*tlie'-greliminar.y plat
of Summit'.Square First Subdivision -and find the f ollowiri- 'items, -in
a
4W
quest -ion:
6 f proposed.plat -do agree
.1-Dimensions' along west line with the
-distances on Sunrise Esta�es-_ Second -Subdivision.
same
�2. A curv'6 will be needed.be-'innin5, whe e 40th Street N-. W.* , as dedicated',
C� r
intersects west line of proposed plat -and continuin -.to-the east.
9
4r3. Beca e-of he.limi��-J nurr��r of acc-e?9ses_t�Zt would 'be ermitted
ng 37 1-- S-tr*eet u e f
a Cr a ibili
-ds. a'shop ng-ce'nter r
once ration' othe' commer a uses in .. t . he B . 3'. stri . ct to he
pa -it is ur opi on th t a-stre�eXshould-be `un aioncr' e east,
de of-,t s-�la-.. The 11 widt .' of' 66' - sh" d b e incl e�din the
Pla" t, a requi by P �agraph -4 .301 (6) o Ordinance o. 1558.-
F' teen pies the. strery rofile,
p or 40th -St -et N W, 'an'
stree alo st prop"e y ine as equired-by- a agraph-4 00
(3)-- of - Ord� =nce'No. 58.
4. A." "no access'"
provisions should b�� rovided along .�he north -rightf-,,
_p
of -way -line of - 37 th Street N.W.
5.-Some definite direction should b 'e east -property line
o th
e. given t
in the description.
6._ The angle in the southwest c.orner does.not agree with the''right-of
way map received f rom the Olms ted County Highway Department.
7. A. deflection angle should be given for the.change in�direction at -
the southw benef "t of future surveys.
est corner of property, for the .1
in this area.
8. Provide a 5' uti t 1, Block 1.
.1ity. easement along 'the..west line of Lo'
In- the future it'would be more understa'dable the vicin*'
n ity' maps
..were drawn at 1000 foot to the inch and would incumber
a greater areai
Conclusion:
.-It is our recommendatio'n '-that this preliminary plat, bea�pp'roved stbject to
the corr4ction�;.:as stated above bein- made or--othen,7ise--resolved.
d
ma
t- limit.pa arrpss���� de--c�ain
stipulations in respect to Access.pbi-nts.. -I believe that the'se approved
access points were supposed to be fo.r-,public -str,eets.
SEV 19 7 0
i'.! G DEPT�
CITY' PLANNU
CITFY ENGIMEER-f
V�.A;Armstrong
DAI E UCr-. D," 1�1/U
FUR M
AGEINDA SECTiON: Q.R)G.IN,AT(NG DE.P'T:
REPORTS, AND RTCQ!mL%TF.NDATIONS PLANNING
'T
EM: e 5th Street S. E.'Trom the
'I I-TE-M DESCRIPTION.- Tetition to Vacat PRVARED BY:
P
UTe s t Line of lst Avenue S ."E. to 100 West
N 0.
September,2.4; 1970-
City. Planning: and Zonin —Commission Recomm'endation-.
OnSeptember 23, 100-the'Citv Planninc, and.'Zo"ninc, Commission considered the
above described pe�-itlon.- We are cogn . izant of the possibility that a future
north bound one way.s.tre.et may,be located in -this area and thAt it might come-
�close to the street.-under.c.,onsideration to be vacated. However, discussions
have been going on.for s6metime ab.out.'this north bound one way.street plan'
and action has been-deferted.'for-ano.ther y6a'r by.the Council. TheEommission.,
feels that the pro'�erty*owners' need. -to -know what the City plans to do in this
area . s . o they can'make-expanison plans of their own. We' feel.; it is.unfair to
these property owners' to ask them to hold up. -any -longer on their plans —This.
is a very small parcel of -street right-of-way, and it may not even -be needed f or
the one * way atreet.'---We -underst�i�d, there are no plans to: extend 5 th S-treet -S.E.
to the West to,connect with the futu*re,ofte way street.- -
Based on these findings we recommend''that this'petition be., -granted approval
subject.to the land 'o.f F-ullerton Lumber Coihpany being-replattea.
Council Act -ion Needed-.
1. If the Council decides' to proceed."with -this, stree-t, vacating.- it should
instruct the-City.Attorney to.prepare a resolution setting a date for
a public hearing.
Attached:
1. _Cop' -of Planning Department Report
y
Sep.te�mber 10, "1970.
w
d Zoning Comi ssion
City Plamning and
'C/o Director
Petition to va'cate Fifth Street S.E. wes t� lQO f
Re, .
-line First-Avenue.S.E.
-the: -above "matter-
-In reply to yoar_ request for our* revie'-w and c oroionts. on
we submidt the f o 11 ml i n-",7
Althougb this section -of 5th S
for us-e-as a pmb li c street- for ma -PLY E�s� claps nat-
__Y r5_,aa_d it
contain any Public s ew e r o r watermains I would not recommen'd
e-rela-t :Lbn-q 'i'T
being:.va ated.at this time-- b f i l-q r-1
Les�a. _os. hi-p- -i-til
dhe of the north-bouna one-way T)ro-oosals an d
-th 'ble
e-p-ps-sa -need
f or s:ome o�� t ht-of-way ip-l-kal-alt-erna-Le
-i 7
r A A
731 r
L
Ak
ROCHESTER FIRE. DEPARTMENT
-ORVILLE N. MERTZ, Chief
.-Septemb6t '10, 1970:
Tom Moore
Summit -Buildinig.
Room 22S
717 3 Avenue S. E�-
Rochester, Minne-sota
Dear Mr.- Moore:
SUBJECT: PETITION TO VACATE FIFTH STREE", S.
E. WEST 100 FEET FROM Tf
'WEST LI14E OF F 1 ST. AVE-TUE S.E.
..,We have no strong objection to the -closing of the above named -street.'
It will; however, pose a problem in protecting Fullerton Lu M.-ber Company
4D
froi-ii.the rear unless other access can be made available. It -will also
make it difficult for:us to 'Clain access to the. property t, o figh-t fire
in some other buildinSs and in railroad freigh"Ll cars. However, if no
more other accesses are shut off in the f uture. we cj�,n_ possibly'work
around these cibstic-Les.
Very truly yo.iirs,
L:-7
Orville Mertz
Chief of Department
OM: PW
r2
101,
970
L_ k
7.
A., V U JA,�, I L XJ 1-, I'l U i'l DA-1 E::.
AGE.N'DA:. S,ECTiON: OR.IGINATING.-
'd
-.�.",:Resolutiohs. and. Ordinances Lega'l Department.
�:JTEM%
-M, w
ITE -DE-SCRIPTIO.N*
P'REP'A.'k'�.D; BY:
N 0.
Re
�solutions-and Ord es-for�1-5-70-Meeting
ina.nc
M
L
e .1lowing list 0 inance�s .,id mot -
h f 6� -f r6solutions �and :ord' nbcessaiily-
c omple:te., '..-The �City.'Attorney may.- int.to uce. dd:'
a. itional. items, at the.,
% -Council
-mee, ing. . ..... .
a..-.-..,Resolut-1o11,.- -rescindihg.that."pprtion of-6 resolution passed
b the:---Counc'l on. July 6, J970 authorizing. the,
�execution of a. wntr*act. for. "Part 11, of *Local
d
r
Improvements -for -No -thern-. Hills- First- Subdivision
exc ep t ing, -s torm sewer -irT.-No`rthern Hills Drive"'
and Griav6l Co.s., Lowell H. �.Penz,
4 :.Floyd-,E. Larson, and Robert:E. bill.. In lieu t .0
here't
the. Mp�,or 'and City -Clerk.-are' �uthori`2e'd to'direct and!
e�. nc. and River-
ce c u te A contract- with. N' r'thern.- Hills� I
tide 8and and Gravel'Co. fot. the construction', of 'these.,.
:improvements..
Re�
Res-olu ion
ta approving:.an,legreement, between .,the. City -'and. N'rthern�-
Hills Inc. concerning-sto.rm-sewer. construction in
Northern Hills'-DriVe in orthern Hills First Subdivis ion... -
r
Under -terms- -of, this agreetent:, No thern-Hills, Ind.'-
Lowell H.: Penz, Floyd E.-'Larsbn, and Robert Gill agree
to pay..t6-the.�City, on demand -when`-tbe -project -is. com�,
6 'tha-t the n y
pleted - a, portion -.of t e �total- cost s -
M --be'as7se sed against benef"ed prb erty,'for-the'
s "to it p
Um ..s
improv.ement, p�,r-oject will. be' that. portion of - the cost .,to be
paid'. from'C' ed as:- A f" ed-
Ity fund's and assess' a e err assessment'
aga ins E ;other properties..,
uti
C. 'Reso ution- amendin� Ordinance No., 871 -as ef ollows.
-Zotes:J' her b
—Secti-ion -B, No.:ZEjhin�;. s el y
amended ;by adding. a, new...paragraph'(222.5) to
r6a d as. follows.:- -
11 (222. 5) l8th Avenue V� -W of both sides_
-between a -feet'more or les's south-of�:,
point . 3 5:0
''.31st-Street Nbrth�iest to' 33rd Street 6s�t
N6rthu
at: a1l. times4"
COUMIL ACTION: 6t ion b y:, Second -bye to..
r
-d Jbasolutipn .-requesting that the Charter Commission.recommend
-.,-to the Councit.-the *adoption.by ordinance of a h'
to th t authoriz
amendment e City Char er ing the
-Council',to levy'an excise* tax not to exceed.3%- on
-by hotels, rooming-h6uses touris*t courts
lodgir.ig
-trailer ar.lodgings other
motels -or -camps,., and simil
than those involving a :don�inuous- petioO-6f 30 days.
or more. (A copy of -.the or'd inanc�e is attached).
ei Resolution Ordering -a fi'ling,of a petition t6 vacate a portion
of 3rd Avenue N. W. .'abuttirig, Valhalla Ath Subdivision
and Elton Hills East 5th.Subdivision, and ordering a.publ!
hearing on this.v6cation November'16' 1970 at 7.:30 P.M.
annexing:to the'City land.:ref6rted to.'as,'the Ba ihly.
f. Ordinanc��
consisting.of approximately 110 acres..
-property,
(2n/d -reading) The first reading was on 9 9 -:7 0. The
Council decided t"o-proceed with- this annexa ti bn at the'
August 3, 1970 meetincy
6
JZ.
W.
BE IT RESO,)LVED.by'the'Cb_Mm0n Council-bf the City of Rochester that
the Charter Com i's re*
m sion-for the. City of Rochester is hereby spectfull
y
xeciuested to- recommend to. the 'Common Council the- adoption by ordinance
pursuant to the provision. s of, Minnesota Statutes j Section 410.31-,'of the
amendment:,
f6llo'wing� Charter'
Amend the Charter of the City of Rochester by adding Section 164
thereto'to read as follows:
."Section, l6.4..'-_.,_ In ad-dition-tp excisetaxes 'imposed by the State
of Minnesota.;and any other taxes, the Common Council is'
authorized.to- levy'an excise tax of- not to exceed three per cent
.,on the- consideration paid,for the. furnishing of lodging by
hotels, rooming hou'ses, 'tourist courts -trailer camps
motels or
and. for the granting of any similar license, to use real property
forlodging -purpose.s- other than the renting or leasing thereof
for a continuous period of 30 days or more."
BE'. IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city'clerk, is directed to forward a
copy of this resolution to. the Rochester Charter Commission -
Passed and adopted by the Common Council of'the'City of Rochester,
Minnesota this day.of. -1970.
President of s iid Common Council'
kttest:
City Clerk,
Approved this day. of . 1970..
Mayor of said City
(Seal of'the City- of
Rochester, Minnesota)
PETITION, TO AMEX R. E. A. PROPERTY NORTH.,' U. S 14. -EAST
e e Q
We have'r viewed th' above application and find'the llowing:'
1. Name of Petitioner: -Peo'le's Coo - 'erative Pow'er As's o'clation
p p
Reason for'Petition: To provide'- sewer and watej� to n'ew' head�uia'rters-building to
c�
be., cons tru' ted'on this -site..
3. Departmental Review:
July,Z, 1970
City Eng
C.A. Armstroncy', ineer
0
approximately one mile from the:e�ast. end of -the -present City
This tract is
sanit.-ir sewer and water main.
y
it is physically possible toex�end the-sanitary-sewjpr.main to serve the
West 1000-feet only of the proposed annexation, but the expen!�e would-be
around $50,000..
To"provi8e adequat-e water service to this trac't and- an'� f urther'-development
in Section 5 will.require the c-onstruction of an'o th e r *,,,7.a t er reserv�Cir and well'.
4. CitX Planning Department:
General:
This property is located just -to the north and east'8E,the east -'lin*e of.Ea'stwood
--Golf course. The,east line of the �.golf course, if. exten'de'd nor.th., is the wes.iL.
line of the property to be annexed.. The right . 7of . -:way of . U.S. 14,.separates
this parcel from the city limits, but fr - om p - revious. in.terpretations this.. may
not pose a legal problem. The legallity of this petition'should-be' checked on
by the..City' Attorney,
The property is used.for agricultural purposes and there'.are farm buildings-
--situated on the land. There.is a large billboard located alonc,'tHe hiahwa
y
on the west edge of this parcel. Immediately to the 'north is -the residential -
subdivision of Sunnydaie and the Skyline School is immediately to the'west"..,
Rural Service District:
This property meets the qualifications.to be designated as- a- Rural Service
District within the City of Rochester.
Land Use.'Plan:
The,City's.adopted Land Use.Pla'n does not extend east far enough to incluae
this pro . perty. The R.O.T.P.S. plan-doesinclude this 'area and.shows-it-as
-being best suited.for general. residential use. Just.recently the County 'changed
the zoning on' this -property to an.industria"I district. .7
I FOP
N NAT ION
............. . 7--
1. Minutes of the Stavdiina Committee's 9-28-70
20 Letter from Peoples Natural Gas asking for rate increase
.3. Letter f r om' Charles Kea'l. re" zoning of GrIndlay property
4. Notice. of Injury.from.Mrs..'.Sain Crawford (referred to Insurance and City Attorney)-.
.5. 'Claim of Damage'to Home at 1856-19th St. N.W. .-.David H, Smith (referred to
Insurance and -City --Attorney)
6., Claim of Injury'- Kurt Ewald (Referred to Insurance and City Atty and City Engr).
7. Referred to Planning and -Zoning:
C>
a. application for.convey4nce of unplatted,.,Iands (8152 7thAve.. S.E.)
b.. applicationfor h variance to allow the erection of 60- ft. high sign
-at 1915 N6rth Highway 52 (International Motel),
c. application to vacate A portion of the alley in Blocks 103'and
104 Willsons Addition (Adamson Motors)
PLEASE NOTE'.TIME SCHEDULE...'
STANDING -COMMITTEE AGENDA
SUMMIT.- BUILDING.
,SEPTEIVIBER 28,1 197Q
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE -No Meetin4'
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 1:00 P.M. '2: 30, P.M...
1. Preliminary cost''report on sewer. and.water extension!-�_b
the proposed REA.Annexation.-E
f
all
2.
P ition for sarfitary -sewer and watermain in 3rd AV'
e.-N.E.
to,serve -Lot 1,* Block 1 Northstar Subdivision.-.,
City Engineer will have a feasibil-ityreport on this. -
project for the 10/5/70.C6uncil Meeting'.'-, Jo'e-Weis has -
:indicated that he.must-have sewer and-water"yet this year,
-but City En
gineer cannot meet this schedule because of
prev.ious,assignments'.- Therefore, the.Com'mitt'e'e-may want
to consider appointing private co'nsultants'to,th-is. project.,
�,z
-6 J A
0_1
3 sewer constru -tion-in.Northwood Drive.. Harold -Paine to.
meet with the Committee on this -matter.'�
Ax, ZA, 4,,,,
7'
o de,
4.. Meet with Jim Parker'-on.Proposed Assessment Roll,'
(Valhalla Subdivision) 3:00 P-.M.
a Spread*.assessments over. -a 10 year period to
lands not sold.
CT_
Agreement with:Metro to include. a ssessTTibnts .'to
-lots -.East of 3rd Ave.,.N.W.
c
-Al
M
C.) -.etro.,objects to, future assessments for sewer
nd.water against lots on,'.North side of
'-19th St'. N-W�
029
_FINLANCE COMMIT.TEE 2:30 P.M. -'.3:00 P. M.'.
1. Request -for Outboard Motor. -
Park Department requests to purchase a-91-2 HP Outboard
Motor for dredging operation. Present motor is'in very
poor-conditi'on.- Cost is �294 with.trade-in. Propose to'
use Capital Improvement Funds presently designated. for
solid waste removal.
IL
2. Acquisition of Park Site Country Club Manor.
4:L-d
COMMITTEE.OF THE WHOLE 3:00 P. M.
1. Sewer.Rate Study Moline & Armstrong.
&kL
2. -Meet with -off-sale Liquor,Dealers.
AIA
- _Ikt,
0A V
3. Review -Unscheduled operating Budgets as time permits.
L,4� �6'.Ijg 61 -
Y
4
PeoMes
Natural GaS Division of
P. 0: Box 641 S.
Rochester, Minn. 5590� Northern Naiural Gas Company
Honorable Mayor and Common Council
City of Rocheste'r'
Rochester, Minnes'ota
Gentlemen:
Please. -consider this letter a request for an increase in retail rates
for natural gas sold to'customers within -the city of Rochester under
jour existinc, franchise.
Peoples has -not had an authorized maximum rate -increase since,August
of-1961. During-the'se past nine years,,we.have be�en able'to.provide
the best of serv:[ce to'our.customeks in addition�'to-giving,two refunds.
We absorbed.an increase in cost of gas from our -supplier early'in 1969,
due.to our -inability to neaotiate an increase.with you body at
that time. In 1970, it was announced that out Wholesale supplier-,.
filed.with the Federal Power Commisisibn an application for an increase--.
for all volume of gas �aken.on and after December 27, 1970.
Although the cost of gas is the biggest single expense of our doing business,
Peoples, as.all businesses, has been subjected'to-man'y other increased
.,costs',7such as capital costs,, and debt c
osts, taxes, and
general.overhead expenses..' These ' are -matters over which Peoples,
--has no control. Peoples can attribute its excellent record to
continually improving the efficiency of its operations. For example*,
we have had an aggressive�marketing program which has increased'the
-annual domestic.consumption and the number of -customers served
per employee. We turned to radio dispatching for service vehicles and
began computer billing. However, it is not po'*sible for us to continue
to fight inflationary pressures as we have in the past. 'If we are to
continue to provide the quality of service' which. -Our customers desire -
and which we as a..company are totally,,committed to provide, we should
have an increase in retail prices.
Peoples has-been proud to serve and-partiqipatein*,:the...growth of-the�
city of'Rocheste'r since 1932,
and.we-look forward, to the future with
optimism. We are -dedicated to providing continued. .14ig h-qual-ity of
service to the c.-ommunity..
So that we can maintain this
same high standard.6f quality of -service
..to the city, we respectfully
request favorable,.response and. action
igh
for h': er retail' rates.
Respectfully yotfrs,
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS
By
R. P. Hermann
.-iZone Manager
Rochester, Minnesota
September 23 1 1-970
Rochester City.Coun,cil.
City I�all
Rochester, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
One hear's -much talk. these days about how the youth of America are losing
faith in our representative form of government. Their ar-ument is that
our elected repr-esentatives.no Jonger represent the interests of the people
who elected them, but have" become tools of the "establishment" to be mani"
pulated to serve the intbrests- of a minority. A. recent action by our City
Council certainly- demonstrates that these young people may be right, at
least some ofthe time.' I refer to -the recent rezonina of the Grindley property
in northwest Rochester-.
When one purchases a. home in an area zoned single family residential, one
-is- supposed to have some assurance that the area will remain that way and
that a 340 unit apartment complex will not be built practically in one's- back
:yard.
But it doesn't seem to work that way in Rochester. All the bi' city'operators
9
have to do, it seems,_ is to hire' a few high priced lawyers and public relations
men to come down to Roches -ter and talk our Council into anything theymant,
whether the people who elected them want it or not. In -the case',of this parti-
cular action, the people in the immediate area most effected certainly did not
want it.
I am sure it can be argued that Rochester needs, or will need)in the near
future, more rental housing. This argument may well be true. It doesnit
appear to be necessary to waste the time and money to look for a parcel of
land '.that is already zoned for apartments. Why bother -,it is much easier
to buy� any.piece of property and talk the Council into changing the zoning later.
Members of the Council, I ask you whose interests were served? The Real
E state Establishment from the big city or the local home owners Who elected
-you?.
Sincerely,
Charles R Keal.
507 - 17th Street NW
Rochester, Minnesota
cc ay - Mayor
D D D
Q
uv�
PQ
A-C
n-K
_QAJ,
-I)i aAk
tLp
6 61�j
A-)
-------------
- --------------
C-D
t in