HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/06/2000_RegularCITY OF ROCHESTER
COUNCIL AGENDA
COUNCIL/BOARD CHAMBERS
GOVERNMENT CENTER
151 4T" STREET SE
MEETING NO. 5
REGULAR
PAGE
(1-2) A) OPEN COMMENT PERIOD
B) CALL TO ORDER
C) LETTERS AND PETITIONS
bc)- Gs
MARCH 6, 2000
7:00 P.M.
(34) D) CONSENT AGENDA/ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS
1)
Approval of Minutes
(5 6}
2)
Amendment to Development Assistance Agreement for Georgetowne
Townhomes (WBI Partners) Tax Increment Financing Project
(7-10)
3)
Decertification of Tax Increment Financing District #9-1 (Western
Digital)
(11-14)
4)
Council Letter Requesting Initiation of Zone Change on Lands
Recently Brought into Rochester Urban Service Area
(15-16)
5)
Bid Award to Alvin E. Benike for Terminal Building Canopy and
Interior Improvements
(17-18)
6)
Bid Award to RenTec Services for Asbestos Abatement for Terminal
Building Interior Improvements
(19-20)
7)
Reimbursable Agreement with Federal Aviation Administration for
Relocation of Visual Landing Equipment Owned & Maintained by FAA
(21-26)
8)
Consideration of Public Utility Board Action
(27-28)
9)
Transfer of On -Sale Wine & 3.2% Beer License from Legends to
Rochester Athletic Club
(29-30)
10)
Transfer of On -Sale Wine & 3.2% Beer License for John's Family
Restaurant
(31-32)
11)
Transfer of Wine & On & Off -Sale 3.2% Beer License for Cucumber
Lil's Inc.
(33-34)
12)
Transfer of On & Off -Sale 3.2 Beer License at Solders Field Golf
Cou rse
(35-36)
13)
Transfer of On -Sale & Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License for J & M's
Family Restaurant
(37-40)
14)
Licenses, Bonds & Miscellaneous Activities
(4 i-42)
15)
Approval of Accounts Payable
Council Agenda
March 6, 2000
Page 2
(43-46)
16)
Appointments/Firefighter/Fire Department
(47-52)
17)
Appointments/Police Officer/Police Department
(53-54)
18)
Labor Agreement for 2000-2002 Local #49/Street and Alley
(55-62)
19)
Appointment to Police Civil Service Commission
(63-64)
20)
Appointment to Housing & Redevelopment Authority
(65-66)
21)
Shelter/Restroom Facility at Silver Lake Adventure Playground
(67-68)
22)
Donation from MN Chapter of ARNA
(69-74)
23)
Feasibility Report of Sanitary Sewer Trunkmain Extension to Serve
Sewer Districts 12cl & 15il along 180 Avenue SW
(75-76)
24)
Owner Contract/South Park Fifth Subdivision
(77-80)
25)
Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve
Pinewood Road SE Area
(81-84)
26)
Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve
Riverview Heights and Cheval Lane NE
(85-86)
27)
Engineering Services Contract with WHKS for Inspection Services for
Riverview Heights & Cheval Lane NE
(87-94)
28)
Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve Baihly
Woodland Subdivision
(95-102)
29)
Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve
Woodland Hills Subdivision
(103-110)
30)
Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer to Serve Marvale Addition and
Whynaughfs Subdivision
(111-112)
31)
Advertise for Bids/Cutback Asphalt RC-800 and Asphalt Emulsion
CRS-2
(113-114)
32)
Advertise for Bids/Plant Mixed Bituminous Materials
(115-116)
33)
Advertise for Bids/Ready-Mixed Concrete
(117-118)
34)
Advertise for Bids/Washed Sand, Gravel, Crushed Rock & Pea
G ravel
(119-122) .
35)
Second Street Ramp Year 2000 Structural Condition Report and
Recommendations
(123-124)
36)
School Zone Safety Changes for St- John's Grade School
(125-126)
37)
1999 Piping Replacement Change Order No.1
E) HEARINGS
(127-128) 1) Type III, Phase I, Final Plat to be Known as Yate's First Subdivision
(129-158) 2) General Development Plan by Ron Yanish to be Known as Salem
Heights
(159-170) 3) Amendment by Ron Yanish to Amend Zoning District for 6.41 Acres
North of Salem Road SW and West of Woodland Drive SW
(171-196) 4) General Development Plan by Bigelow Enterprises to be Known as
Kingsbury Hills
Council Agenda
March 6, 2000
Page 3
(197-228) 5)
General Development Plan by Arcon Development, Inc. to be Known
as Graves Property
(229-248) 6)
Land Use Plan Amendment by Badger Development, LLC to Amend
Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to Allow for Approx. 55.34 Acres
of "Commercial" Land Use Designation and Approx. 40.17 Acres of
"Medium Density" Land Use Designation
(249-258) 7)
Zone Change Petition by Badger Development, LLC to Designate
Approx. 55.34 Acres M-1 Zoning District, Approx. 40.17 Acres R-3
Zoning District & Approx. 140.13 Acres R-2 Zoning District/West of
West Circle Drive and South of Valleyhigh Road NW
(259-286) 8)
General Development Plan by Badger Development, LLC to be
Known as Badger Ridge
(287-308) 9)
General Development Plan by Big DE Development to be Known as
Hidden Oaks Valley
(309-322) 10)
Type III, Phase II, Preliminary Plat to be Known as Bandel North First
Subdivision
(323-332) 11)
Final Plat to be Known as Diamond Ridge Seventeen
(333-344) 12)
Reconsideration of Bituminous Plant included in Restricted
Development Conditional Use Permit for Property Located South of
40d' Street SW, West of T.H. 63
(345-350) 13)
Annexation by Ordinance Petition by Payne Company to Annex
Approx. 6.40 Acres Along South Side of Viola Road NE, East of
Century Hills Drive NE
(351-356) 14)
Issuance of Airport Exempt Facility Bonds for Airborne Express
(357-358) 15)
Permit Parking Petition 2"d Street NW/700 Block
(359-360) 16)
Amend 1998 Action Plan for City of Rochester's Community
Development Block Grant Program
F) REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(361-362) G) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
H) TABLED ITEMS
I) OTHER BUSINESS
J) ADJOURNMENT
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING
DATE: ) 6 00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
OPEN COMMENT PERIOD
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
A
EM DESCRIPTION: OPEN COMMENT PERIOD
PREPARED BY:
S. KVENtiOLD
i
i
This agenda section is primarily for the purpose of allowing citizens to address the City Council on a topic of
their choice. The following guidelines apply:
• This section of the agenda may not be used as a forum to continue discussion on an agenda item which has
already been held as a public hearing.
• This agenda section is limited to 15 minutes and each speaker is limited to 4 minutes.
• Any speakers not having the opportunity to be heard will be first to present at the next Council meeting.
• Citizens may only use this forum to address the Council on a maximum of one time per month.
• Matters currently under negotiation, litigation or related to personnel will not be discussed in this forum.
• Questions posed by a speaker will generally be responded to in writing.
)UNCILACTION: Moconby: second by: to:
I
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CONSENT AGENDA
DESCRIPTION:
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
MEETING
DATE: 3 6.00
ITEM NO.
D-1-37
PREPARED BY:
G. NEUMANN,
This RCA lists all the items which have been included in the consent agenda for this meeting. The Council can
approve all of the items with a single motion to approve. The Council President will allow the Councilmembers
an opportunity to state whether there are any of these items which you wish to have removed from the consent
agenda approval and to have them discussed and acted upon separately by the Council.
The consent agenda for this meeting ponsists of the following RCAs:
D-1. Approval of Minutes
D-2. Amendment to Development Assistance Agreement for Georgetowne Townhomes (WBI Partners) Tax
Increment Financing Project
113-3. Decertification of Tax Increment Financing District #9-1 (Western Digital)
D-4. Council Letter Requesting Initiation of Zone Change on Lands Recently Brought into Rochester Urban
Service Area
D-5. Bid Award to Alvin E. Benike for Terminal Building Canopy and Interior Improvements
D-6. Bid Award to RenTec Services for Asbestos Abatement for Terminal Building Interior Improvements
D-7. Reimbursable Agreement with Federal Aviation Administration for Relocation of Visual Landing
Equipment Owned & Maintained by FAA
D-8. Consideration of Public Utility Board Action
D-9. Transfer of On -Sale Wine & 3.2% Beer License from Legends to Rochester Athletic Club
D-10. Transfer of On -Sale Wine & 3.2% Beer License for John's Family Restaurant
D-11. Transfer of Wine & On & Off -Sale 3.2% Beer License for Cucumber Lil's Inc.
D-12. Transfer of On & Off -Sale 3.2 Beer License at Solders Field Golf Course
D-13. Transfer of On -Sale & Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License for J & M's Family Restaurant
D-14. Licenses, Bonds & Miscellaneous Activities
D-15. Approval of Accounts Payable
D-16. Appointments/Firefighter/Fire Department
D-17. Appointments/Police Officer/Police Department
D-18. Labor Agreement for 2000-2002 Local #49/Street and Alley
D-19. Appointment to Police Civil Service Commission
` D-20. Appointment to Housing & Redevelopment Authority
D-21. Shelter/Restroom Facility at Silver Lake Adventure Playground
D-22. Donation from MN Chapter of ARNA
D-23. Feasibility Report of Sanitary Sewer Trunkmain Extension to Serve Sewer Districts 12c1 & 15i1 along
18'h Avenue SW
..%jUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second
4
Council Action Requested
Approval of Consent Agenda Items
:March 6, 2000
Page 2
D-24. Owner ContracuSouth Park Fifth Subdivision
D-25. Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve Pinewood Road SE Area
D-26. Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve Riverview Heights and Cheval Lane NE
D-27. Engineering Services Contract with WHKS for Inspection Services for Riverview Heights & Cheval Lane
NE
D-28. Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve Baihly Woodland Subdivision
D-29. Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer & Watermain to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision
D-30. Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer to Serve Marvale Addition and Whynaught's Subdivision
D-31. Advertise for Bids/Cutback Asphalt RC-800 and Asphalt Emulsion CRS-2
D-32. Advertise for Bids/Plant Mixed Bituminous Materials
D-33. Advertise for Bids/Ready-Mixed Concrete
D-34. Advertise for Bids/Washed Sand, Gravel, Crushed Rock & Pea Gravel
D-35. Second Street Ramp Year 2000 Structural Condition Report and Recommendations
D-36. School Zone Safety Changes for St. John's Grade School
D-37. 1999 Piping Replacement Change Order No.I
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve consent agenda items.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
SECTION: I ORIGINATING DEPT:
CONSENT AGENDA I CITY ADMLtiISTRATOR
t i EM DESCRIPTION: Amendment to Development Assistance Agreement for Georgetowne
Townhomes (WBI Partners) Tax Increment Financing Project
MEETING
DATE: 3 6 00
ITEM NO.
b'a
PREPARED BY:
T.SP.AETH
On November 1, 1999 the Council approved a TIF Plan and Develoment Agreement with WBI Partners for the
construction of 100 townhome units, 30 of which would be receiving tax credits and tax increment financing assistance
from the City and would be considered "affordable" units. The Development Agreement stipulated that not less than 20%
of the units would be available to individuals at or below 50% of the area median income and that rents on said units shall
be restricted to not exceed 30% of the applicable income limitations for a 15 year period that makes up the "term" of the
TIF district. The City agreed to provide tax increment assistance to defray a portion of the up front site development costs.
The City would provide assistance to the developer in the form of actual tax increments received minus eligible City
administrative expenses such that Weis Partners would receive S400,000 over the duration of the Agreement.
Because of rising FMHA interest rates and other increasing development costs, the project is not feasible under that
Development Agreement and the developer has not executed that Agreement. The developer has since been working on a
financing proposal, wherein the MHFA would be the mortgagor for the project in the amount of nearly $4.5 million of the
approximately $10.6 million project development cost. The developer would be utilizing their tax credit syndication
proceeds, along with increased funding levels from the Greater Minesota Housing Fund and other MHFA programs, and
City TIF assistance to finance the remainder of the project costs.
Based upon MHFA participation as the primary mortgagor for the project, the developer has approached City staff to
inquire as to whether the City would be willing to provide further TIF assistance than previously agreed upon, in return for
a greater number of "affordable" units in the project. The developer is now requesting City TIF assistance in the amount of
$650,000 @ 6% interest for approximate total TIF payments of $925,000 in order to facilitate the construction of the
project. Based upon current tax estimates, this amount of TIF should be paid off in approximately 9 years.
In return, the City would be getting 50 "housing tax credits affordable " rental units with rent restrictions for 30 years (See
attached table for no. of unit & rent information). It should also be noted that the remaining 50 units will have rent
restrictions and will now be affordable to persons below 80% median income, with rents of S850 / 2 bedroom unit and
S956 i 3 bedroom unit vs. the previous proposed rents of $1000 and $1200 / month respectively.
The proposed townhome project would be considered a "qualified" housing district, and therefore not subject to any LGA
penalty or local contribution requirement.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion for approval to amend Development Agreement with WBI Partners to provide TIF assistance in the amount of
$650.000 @ 6% interest in order to facilitate construction of the 100 proposed rental townhome units.
)UNCILACTION: Motion by Second
Georbetowne Townhomes (Weis) REVISED BASED UPON NEW
PROPOSAL
Rental Rates
No. of Units
No. of Bedrooms
S . Ft.
Rents($)
25%C650%median
l8
2
1120
5538
income (Tax Credit &
ARIF Units
25%(a,50%median
7
3
1226
$614
income Tax Credit &
AR1F Units)
25%a,50%median
18
2
1120
$546
income (Tax Credit
Units
25%a,50%median
7
3
1226
5625
income Tax Credit
Units
50% 80% median
35
2
1120
$850
income
50%80% median
15
3
1226
$950
income
This project utilized TIF assistance and the City's 2000 Allocation of Tax Credits
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
P.IEETiNG
-07
DATE: = 6.00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
1 ITEM NO.
Consent Agenda
City Administration
i i cM DESCRIPTION Decertification of Tax Increment Financing District # 9-1 (Western
I PREPARED BY:
Digital)
T. Spaeth
I
As the Council is aware, Western Digital Corp. has closed its Enterprise Storage Division operations in Rochester, and
on 2,129/00 closed on a sale to the Mayo Foundation , of their recently constructed facility and property located north of
41" Street NW, along the east side of West Circle Drive.
i
Several weeks ago, the Council approved a Settlement Agreement with Western Digital that "terminated the
Development Agreement and TIF Note that had previously been executed. At this time, it is now necessary to de-
certify the Tax Increment Financing district that had previously been approved.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt TIF District de -certification resolution
_.IUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
CITY OF ROCHESTER
COUNTY OF OLMSTED
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECERTIFYING TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 9-1
BE IT RESOLVED bythe Common Council (the "Council') ofthe City of Rochester,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Recitals.
(a) The Citycreated its Tax Increment Financing District No. 9-1 (the "TIF
District"), to assist a certain project (the "Project") developed by Western Digital
Corporation (the "Company").
(b) Due to a variety of factors, the Company has not occupied the Project
and has sold it or intends to sell it for uses which would be inconsistent of the
requirements justifying the existence of the TIF District.
(c) The City and the Company have entered into a certain Settlement
Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2000, pursuant to which the City has reserved the
right, as against objection from the Company, to terminate the TIF District.
2. Termination of TIF District. The Council hereby terminates the TIF District
and instructs City staff to notify the Olmsted County Auditor of that termination. In the
interest of efficient property tax administration, the Council states its preference that the
decertification be made effective so that the captured value in the TIF District be available
for regular property taxation for taxes payable in the current year. In the event that does not
occur and the City receives any tax increment from the TIF District, the same shall be
returned to the County as excess increment. To date, the City has received no increment
from the TIF District.
1136443.1
I
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2000.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Approved this
(Seal of the City of
Rochester, Minnesota)
PRESIDENT OF SAID COMMON
COUNCIL
day of March, 2000.
MAYOR OF SAID CITY
l 136443.1 2
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING
DATE: 3 6 00�
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent .agenda
ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO.
City Administrator b _
ITEM DESCRIPTION Council letter requesting initiation of zone change on lands recently
I PREPARED BY:
brought into the Rochester Urban Service Area
T. Spaeth
The Olmsted County Board of Commissioners recently approved an amendment to the Olmsted County Land
Use Plan wherein approximately 5100 acres of land lying between 651h and 85th Streets NW was redesignated
from the "agricultural" designation to the "urban service area" designation at the request of the City of
Rochester.
At this time, a large share of the area is zoned A-2 (.Agricultural Protection), which is rather restrictive on the
amount of non -farm development that can occur within the district. (Presently only 1 non -farm dwelling per
t/4 '/4 section of land is permitted.). It would seem reasonable to continue to leave those areas zoned that way
until such time that urban development is being proposed to occur on those properties, or at least until such
time that urban development starts encroaching closer to those areas. However, a portion of this area is zoned
A-3 (Agricultural), which is less restrictive in terms of non -farm development (allows 2 non -farm dwellings
per /4 section) and is generally located in closer proximity to existing urban areas.
At this time, it would seem prudent to request that the Olmsted County Planning Advisory Commission
initiate a rezoning on the presently zoned A-3 properties to the A-4 (Agricultural -Urban Expansion) zoning
district. The intent of the A-4 district is to provide for urban expansion in accordance with the Olmsted
County Land Use Plan, by conserving land for farming and other open space uses for a period of time until
urban services become available to serve those properties. The A-4 district permits 1 dwelling per 35 acres as
a faro dwelling. This district does not allow new animal feedlots to be established, and restricts the expansion
of any existing animal feedlots.
The A-4 zoning district is consistent with the "urban service area" designation that was recently approved by
the County Board, and affords this area an opportunity to accommodate the future growth of the City with a
minimal amount of impediments to extension of future infrastructure.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion by Council to request the Olmsted County Planning Advisory Commission to initiate a zoning district
amendment from the A-3 district to the A-4 district on those properties recently brought into the Urban
Servcie Area.
I
UNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to:
r
February 18, 2000
To: Gary Neumann, City Administration
From: Ron Livingston, Planning Supervisor
Re: Zoning in 651h/85`h Streets Area
�Oi 14 t51_FN•ljrt ��
B � TFD.�CGL
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507/285-8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADDRESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSING/HRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
507/285.8213
WELL/SEPTIC
507/285.8345
FAX
5071287.2275
As you know, the Olmsted County Board recently amended the Olmsted County Land
Use Plan to designate considerable acreage in this area as Urban Service Area. In
discussing the zoning of this area with the Olmsted County Planning Advisory
Commission last night, they indicated that they would initiate the rezoning of this area if
requested by the City of Rochester.
In our discussions at both the County Board hearing and at the Planning Commission we
indicated that it would be advisable to rezone those lands currently zoned A-3 to the A-4
district. We felt that any lands zoned A-1 or A-2 could remain zoned that way as these
are fairly restrictive agricultural districts. Any lands currently zoned residential could also
remain as they are currently zoned.
I will include a copy of the current County zoning map for your review. Please give me a
call if you have any questions.
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING /
DATE: 3%6i00��
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Rochester International Airport
ITEM NO.
D
I' )ESCRIPTION: Bid award to Alvin E. Benike for Terminal Building Canopy and
PREPARED By:
Interior Improvements.
Steven W. Legve
The Rochester Airport Commission recommends and requests Council authorization to:
Award a bid to Alvin E. Benike inc for Terminal Building improvements. These improvements will include a
canopy over the roadway in front of the Terminal Building and interior updates inside the Terminal Building to
the main lobby, rental car area, restrooms, security screening area, upper level gate areas and gift
shop/restaurant entrances. This project is in the current CIP. (76942)
Engineer's Estimate: $2,082,417
Total Bid: $2,421,900.00
Funding:
Local $1,725,840.00
State $696,060.00
Local share:
Sales Tax $1,029,420.00
Airport Reserves $324,630.00
Passenger Facility Charges (PFC) $371,790.00
The Rochester International Airport has PFC collection authority of $1,572,155.00 for Terminal Building
Improvements. These funds will be collected to reimburse a portion of the local share.
Bid tabulations attached
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Resolution authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the contract with Alvin E. Benike, Inc. and other
documents related to this project.
NCILACTION: Motion by: S=ndby: to:
((a
■ 1�
«
°
z
Egg
M
}
EJ
.
,
.
!
\
k
§
&
^
=
k
g
k
§
t
■
k
,
t
�
k}
k
7
■
.
%
(
�
k
`m
d
)
§
■
a
■
�
T.
}\
c
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE: 316i00
CONSENT AGENDA
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Rochester International Airport
M NO.
D-6
I' )ESCRIPTION: Bid award to RenTec Services for asbestos abatement for Terminal I PREPARED BY:
Building Interior Improvements. Steven W. Legve
The Rochester Airport Commission recommends and requests Council authorization to:
Award a bid to RenTec Services for licensed asbestos abatement. The asbestos removal will be part of the
Terminal Building remodeling project scheduled for Spring/Summer of 2000. (J6942
Engineer's Estimate: $60,000
Total Bid: $37,650.00
Funding:
60% State
40% Local
Bid tabulations attached.
( JCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Resolution authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the contract with RenTec Services and other
documents related to this project.
NCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by:
O�
,
)
|
!E
\�
116
C)
£
o k�)
2m�¢
dM ond/§§
\!��
;§$
>$|mm
§)§
k§
gym)
kce
0m
Ȥm
k§
0
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING +9
DATE: 3'6 00
SEG LION:
CONSENT AGENDA
Rochester International Airport
EM DESCRIPTION: Reimbursable Agreement with the Federal Aviation Administration for
the relocation visual landing equipment owned and maintained by the FAA.
The Rochester Airport Commission recommends and requests Council authorization to:
D-%
PREPARED BY:
Steven W. Legve
Enter into a reimbursable agreement (AGL-293) with the FAA for the relocation of Runway End Identifier
Lights and a Visual Approach Slope Indicator, both of which are visual landing equipment owned and
maintained by the FAA. This work is necessary to complete a runway extension to Runway 02-20. (J6911)
Total Estimated Cost: $139,084.00
This cost will be included in the total runway extension project cost. An exact breakdown of funding sources
will be determined before bidding.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Resolution authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreementwith the Federal Aviation
Administration.
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by:
A
Meeting
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date 3/6/00
GENOA SECTION
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
D — $
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
PREPARED BY:
Consideration of Public Utility Board Action
Kathy Wilson
The Rochester Public Utility Board has approved the following on February 29, 2000 and requests
the Common Council's favorable consideration:
to approve a resolution to approve a purchase order agreement with Delta Star, Inc.
for one 16lkV outdoor power transformer. The amount of the purchase order
agreement to be $450,804.00 and Delta Star, Inc. being lowest responsible bidder.
to approve a resolution to approve a purchase order agreement with Siemens Power
T&D Inc. for one 15kV indoor metal clad switchgear. The amount of the purchase
order agreement to be $199,559.00 and Siemens Power T&D Inc. being lowest
responsible bidder.
to approve a resolution to approve a contract agreement with GE Energy Services
and that the Common Council authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the
agreement for Silver Lake plant unit No. 4 turbine -generator overhaul. The amount
of the agreement not to exceed $556,600.00 and GE Energy Services being lowest
responsible bidder.
to approve a resolution to approve a time and materials contract agreement with
RSA Companies and that the Common Council authorize the Mayor and the City
Clerk to execute the agreement for enterprise maintenance software implementation.
The amount of the agreement not to exceed $443,000.00.
GENERAL MANAGER: PIu �i�aad
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
FOR BOARD ACTION
Agenda Item # 3. a.
Meeting Date: 2/29/2000
SUBJECT: Neil Stiller
Sr. Electrical Engineer
PREPARED BY: CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
OUTDOOR POWER TRANSFORMER FOR WILLOW CREEK SUBSTATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Bids were opened on February 7, 2000 for one 161kV, 15 MVA outdoor power transformer.
This transformer will be used at the Willow Creek Substation to meet the growing electric
requirements of that area. It is part of a budgeted project.
Manufacturers of new and refurbished equipment were considered. Four bids were received
from new manufacturers, and all are considered responsible. Evaluation of bids took the
following form. The evaluation is attached for your information.
i. Calculate the lowest life cycle cost per bid based on guaranteed losses over 20 years.
2. Identify all bids with a life cycle cost within 10% of the lowest life cycle cost bid.
3. Bidder qualification factors and conformance to specifications are considered.
4. Of the bids identified in Step 2 and not disqualified by Step 3, the bid with the lowest
initial purchase price is the recommended bid.
Delivery of this transformer is scheduled for February, 2001. Due to high market demand for
this type of equipment and fewer vendors, lead times are quite long. RPU is therefore required
to make a long range project schedule to accommodate the lead time issue.
UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
It is recommended that the Utility Board request Common Council approval of a purchase order
agreement with Delta Star, Incorporated, in the amount of $450,804.
ReQttWesA Z-22: oo WYI!�
FOR BOARD ACTION
Agenda Item# 3.b. Meeting Date: 2/29/2000
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF BIDS
15kV INDOOR METALCLAD SWI'ITCHGEAR
PREPARED BY: Neil Stiller
Sr. Electrical Engineer
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Bids were opened on February 16, 2000 for seven cubicles of 15kV metalclad indoor switchgear. This
switchgear will be used at the Willow Creek Substation to meet the growing electric requirements of that
area. It is part of a budgeted project. Delivery of this switchgear is scheduled for October, 2000.
National and regional manufacturers were considered. Seven bids were received and all are considered
responsible. Evaluation of bids took the following form. The evaluation is attached for your information.
1. Base price and delivery terms for equipment.
2. Bidder qualification factors and conformance to specifications are considered.
3. Of the bids not disqualified by Step 2, the bid with the lowest purchase price is the
recommended bid
Compliance to specification was closely reviewed. While all contending manufacturers took exceptions,
certain exceptions were considered key to the integrity and function of the equipment. Engineering and
Technical Services staff physically inspected recent installations of equipment by the low bidder (ABB)
and the runner-up (Siemens). RPU does not have recent purchase history with either manufacturer in this
category of equipment. These inspections, along with compliance to specification issues, indicate that the
Siemens proposal provides a superior product to RPU. Specifically, the Siemens proposal was compliant
with regard to a "floor roll -out" breaker design. Also, the Siemens product uses a heavier gauge steel to
provide structural rigidity it its enclosure and equipment mounting.
UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
It is recommended that the Utility Board reject the bid proposal from ABB Power T&D Company based on
failure to meet bid specifications. It is further requested that the Utility Board request Common Council
approval of a purchase order agreement with Siemens Power T&D Inc. in the amount of S199,559.
G Manager Date
/
FOR BOARD ACTION
Agenda Item # 4 Meeting Date: 2 / 29/ 2000
SUBJECT:
SLP Unit 4 Turbine Generator Overhaul and Retaining Ring Replacement
PREPARED BY:
Wally Schlink, Manager of Power Production
ITEM DESCRIPTION: On February 4, 2000 three bids were received for the above referenced project.
Specifications were distributed to five turbine generator repair ferns.
SLP Unit 4 turbine generator is scheduled for the five-year major maintenance overhaul beginning
April 7 through May 12, 2000. The purpose of the inspection is to confirm machine integrity and to
return the unit to near -new condition and design efficiency. The inspection is an industry standard and
is required by our insurance carrier and by prudent utility practices. The schedule was established to
have the unit available for the summer generation season.
In addition to the major overhaul, the unit requires the replacement of the generator rotor retaining
rings. All generator owner -operators have been notified by the original equipment manufacturer that the
material the rings are forged from is susceptible to stress corrosion cracking. The catastrophic
characteristic of an in-service failure requires replacing the existing retaining rings with rings made of a
material not prone to this failure.
The bid specification was developed in three workscopes. The first comprised of the work that is
known and identified including the replacement of the retaining rings. Firm bids were requested for
Workscope I. The second and third workscopes being lists of repairs that may be encountered when
the machine is disassembled and inspected. The second and third workscopes are a mixture of firm
bids, estimates and exceptions as the work is not defined or the extent of damages known prior to
disassembly.
Attached is a matrix comparing the bid packages for Workscope I. GE Energy Services is the only
bidder that complies with the outage schedule including retaining ring replacement. GE Energy
Services Workscope I is the lowest evaluated bid when exceptions are evaluated. Staff estimates that
the balance of work can be completed on a time & material basis not to exceed the total of approved
funds. All bidders submitted hourly rates for various disciplines as part of the bid package for extra
work.
UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution requesting the Common Council to approve a
contract agreement with GE Energy Services to provide services and parts for the SLP Unit 4
Turbine Generator Overhaul and Retaining Ring Replacement as defined in the specification. The
r a�
Gei6kal Manager ate
ROCHESTER PUBLIC UTILITIES
I
FOR BOARD ACTION
Agenda Item # 4
Meeting Date: 2/ 29/2000
contract agreement will be for a firm price for Workscope I of the specification, and time and
material for Workscopes II & III for items as determined by staff. The total amount is not to exceed
$556,600.00, which is the approved budgeted amount for this project.
R4N c-c wmi 2- 23 -C10 W V\S,
General Manager Date
ROCHESTER PUBLIC UTH.ITIES
FOR BOARD ACTION
Agenda Item# 5 Meeting Date: 2/29/2000
SUBJECT: Enterprise Maintenance Software Implementation
PREPARED BY: Bill Cook, Supervisor of Environmental, GIS and Fleet
Jim Daley, Manager — Information Services
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
At the December 1999 Board meeting, we presented an overview of a proposal to implement the next
phase of our SAP enterprise software. This phase would focus on building a common solution for tracking
maintenance for all of our equipment -and facility assets. It would replace a variety of individual manual,
stand-alone personal computer and centrally shared automated processes that are currently used to track our
maintenance management needs. It will also be tightly integrated with the financial and management
reporting software that was implemented during the first phase of our SAP enterprise software project.
The attached document provides a breakdown of the tangible and intangible return on the implementation
of the SAP maintenance software tools. It also includes a breakdown of the estimated cost to implement
the software that was prepared by RSA Companies and is based upon a preliminary scoping effort they
conducted in December 1999. RSA Companies was our implementation partner for the first phase of our
enterprise software implementation and recently completed a similar project at Lincoln Electric System.
RSA Companies estimates the time and materials cost of implementing the base software at $320,640 plus
living expenses. The actual cost could change if additional requirements are discovered once the actual
detail design process known as "blueprinting" is completed. We recommend adding 18% for expenses and
a 20% contingency for additional requirements discovered during the detail design process for a total cost
of approximately $443,000. The 2000 budget includes $470,000 for this project.
UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
The Board is requested to approve and recommend Council approval for a time and materials contract
agreement with RSA Companies for an enterprise maintenance software implementation not to exceed
$443,000.
AMA,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING ;L'7 '
DATE: 1 6 00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
I ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
CITY CLERK
6, p
9M DESCRIPTION TRANSFER OF THE ON SALE WINE & 3.2 % BEER LICENSE
PREPARED BY:
FROM LEGENDS TO ROCHESTER ATHLETIC CLUB
DONNA a sCHOTT
Application for the transfer of the On Sale Wine and 3.2 % Beer license for the former Legends Restaurant
has been received by the Rochester Athletic Club at 3100 19d' St NW. They will now be managing the
restaurant to be named Rochester Athletic Club. The former owner of the Legends Restaurant at that location
was Joseph Powers.
The Rochester Athletic Club is requesting the transfer of the license as of April 1, 2000. Transfer would be
pending the required fees, insurance certificates and the completion of the confidential investigation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve the transfer of the On Sale Wine and 3.2% Beer license from the Legends Restaurant to
The Rochester Athletic Club.
UNCIL ACTION: motion by Second by: to
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEET',NG
DATE: + 6 00
CONSENT AGENDA
CITY CLERK
ITEM NO.
D- to
!M DESCRIPTION: TRANSFER OF THE ON SALE WINE AND 3.2% BEER PREPARED BY:
LICENSE FOR JOHN'S FAMILY RESTAURANT DONNA J SCHOTT
Application for the transfer of the On Sale Wine and 3.2% Beer Licenses for John's Family Restaurant
Located at 6 — I" Ave NW has been received from Bharat Patel for DMS Patel, LLC DBA John's Familv
Restaurant & Coffee Shop. John Cokinos was the former owner of the restaurant.
Mr. Patel is requesting approval of the transfer to DMS Patel LLC. as of April 1, 2000 . The transfer would
be pending the required fees, insurance certificates and completion of the confidential investigation on the
applicants.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve the transfer of the wine and 3.2 beer license for John's Family Restaurant from
John Cokinos to DMS Patel LLC. DBA Johns Family Restaurant and Coffee House.
UNCIL ACTION: Motion eY second
AGENDA 5
CONSENT AGENDA
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINATING
CITY CLERK
W DESCRIPTION: TRANSFER OF WINE & ON & OFF SALE 3.2% BEER
LICENSE FOR CUCUMBER LIL'S INC.
MEETING 3
DATE: = 6 00
ITEM NO.
b- (I
PREPARED BY:
DONNA ISCHOTT
Application for transfer of the Wine and On & Off Sale 3.2% Beer License for the 63 Club located at 1726
South Broadway has been received from Michelle Crawford of Mazeppa, Mn. Scott DePoppe was the former
owner of the 63 Club.
Ms. Crawford is requesting approval of the transfer of the licenses as of March 6, 2000. The new name of
the establishment will be Cucumber Lil's, Inc. Transfer will be pending the required fees, insurance certificates
and completion the confidential investigation on the applicant.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve the transfer of the On sale Wine and On & Off Sale 3.2 Beer License to Michelle
Crawford for Cucumber Lil's Inc.
UNCIL ACTION: Motion by Second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 3 3
DATE: = 6 00
CONSENT AGENDA
ORIGINATING DEPT:
CITY CLERK
ITEM NO.
D-ra--
'M DESCRIPTION: TRANSFER OF THE ON & OFF SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE AT PREPARED BY:
SOLDIERS FIELD GOLF COURSE DONNA J SCHOTT
Application for the transfer of the On & Off Sale 3.2 Beer License for Soldiers Field Golf Course
(19s' Hole at Soldiers Field) has been received from Brian J. Veloske. Marilyn Day was the former manager
of the restaurant.
Mr Veloske is requesting approval of the transfer to The Turn Restaurant & Golf Concessions at Soldiers
Field Golf Course as of April 1, 2000. The transfer would be pending the required fees, insurance
Certificates and all departmental approvals.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve the transfer of the 3.2 beer license from Marilyn Day to Brian Veloske.
1UNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETI AG 357
DATE: 3 600
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
CITY CLERK
t D 1 3
�M DESCRIPTION TRANSFER OF THE ON SALE & SUNDAY INTOXICATING
PREPARED BY:
LIQUOR FOR J & M'S FAMILY RESTAURANT
DONNA J SCHOTT
Application for the transfer of the On Sale & Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License for J & M'S Family
Restaurant at Soldier's Field Motel, 401 6" St SW has been received from Myron J. Salz. The former owner
was John Forman.
Mr. Salz is requesting transfer as of April 1, 2000. The new name of the establishment is J & M Family
Restaurant Inc. DBA Shady Hill Grille. Transfer would be pending the required fees, insurance certificates
and the completion of the confidential investigation of the applicant.
COUNCIL ACTION REOUESTED
A motion to approve the transfer of the On Sale and Sunday Intoxicating Liquor for J & M'S Family
Restaurant
IUNCIL ACTION: Motion by Second by: to
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT .AGENDA
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CITY CLERK
M DESCRIPTION: LICENSES. BONDS & MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES
MEETING
DATE: 3 6 00
ITEM NO.
D-►4
PREPARED BY:
DONNA JSCHOTT
The following licenses. bonds and miscellaneous activities are submitted for the Council's approvals or
disapprovals. All are pending departmental approvals. the required insurance. bonds. fees and all outstanding
debts with the City of Rochester.
HAVC
Duane's Heating & Ventilating
101 Harvester Ave
Winona Mn 55987
MASTER INSTALLER
Russell Thorn
857 East 4 h St
Winona Mn 55987
SEWER AND DRAINS
Berne Construction
Burton Johnson
23362 Co Hwy 24
West Concord Mn 55985
SOUND AMPLIFICATION
Olmsted County Fairboard
Olmsted County Fair 7/31/00 thru 8/6/00 8:00 AM to 1:00 AM
Olmsted County Fairgrounds
Rochester Mn 55904
UNCIL ACTION: Motion by second
4070 LICENSES, BONDS AND MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES
PAGE 2
MARCH 6.2000
OFF SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR (.annual Renewals
A C Liquor Inc. DBA Andy's Liquor
Andy's Crossroads Liquor Inc. DBA Andy's
B & F Leasing Inc. DBA Apollo Liquor & Smokeshop
Deanna Inc. DBA Apollo Wine & Spirits
Barb's Northbrook Liquor, Inc. DBA Northbrook Liquor
RMT of Rochester Inc., A Mn Corp DBA Buckeye Liquor
RSI-Supervalu Inc. DBA Cub Foods Bar Creek Liquors
Route 52 Ligeurs/Wines/Ales Inc. DBA Hillcrest Liquor
Joe's Liquors Inc.
Sunstone Hotel Properties Inc. DBA Kahler Downtown Liquors
MGM Wine & Spirits Inc. DBA MGM Liquor Warehouse
Plaza Liquor
Sam's West Inc. DBA Sam's Club #6427
CLUB ON SALE LIQUOR (Annual Renewals)
AFL-CIO Labor Club DBA Labor Club
William T. McCoy Post 492 DBA American Legion Post #92
Rochester Elks Lodge # 1091
Fraternal Order of Eagles #2228 DBA F.O.E. #2228
Columbus Building Association DBA Knights of Columbus
Loyal Order of Moose DBA Rochester Moose Lodge #2128
Rochester Golf & Country Club
VFW Post #215 Whitlock Sonnenberg
WINE (Annual Renewals)
Karla Sperry DBA Bilotti's Italian Restaurant
Chardonnay, LTD.
Cucumber Lil's Inc. DBA Cucumber Lil's
Hung Fu Chue DBA China Dynasty
Guo Xiao DBA China Garden
Cynthia Elizabeth Daube DBA Daube's Bakery & German Restaurant
Denny's Inc. DBA Denny's Restaurant #1368
Nghi B. Sam DBA Great China Restaurant
India Garden Inc.
John Hardy's Bar-B-Que Inc. 29 W Frontage Rd, Hwy 52 N
John Hardy's Bar-B-Que Inc. 940 S Bdwy
DMS Patel LLC dba John's Family Restaurant & Coffee Shop
Rochester Athletic Club
Theatres at Galleria LLC. DBA Theartres at Galleria
JADCO LLC DBA Valentino's of Rochester
Wong's Cafe, A General Partnership DBA Wong's Cafe
Deane M/ Stowers DBA Wright Stuff Restaurant
Zorba's Restaurant of Rochester Mn. DBA Zorba's Greek Restaurant
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING
DATE: 3/
CONSENT AGENDA
DESCRIPTION: LICENSES, BONDS &
CITY CLERK
ACTIVITIES
D-14
DONNA ISCHOTT
The following ADDENDUM licenses, bonds and miscellaneous activities are submitted for the Council's
approvals or disapprovals. All are pending departmental approvals, the required insurance, bonds, fees and all
outstanding debts with the City of Rochester.
HAVC
Superior Mechanical Systems, Inc.
1244 60d' Ave. NW Suite C
Rochesster, Mn. 55902
Air Conditioning & Heating Doc
1435 Industrial Dr. NW
Rochestr, Mn. 55901
MASTER INSTALLER
Robert A. Jones
2977 MacArthur Ln SE
Rochester, Mn. 55904
Larry W. Thompson
8839 West 1515' St
Prior Lake, Mn. 55372
MISCELLANEOUS STREET USE
St. John's Cathollic Church
Procession of the Cross 4/21/00
Assemble at Civic Center, Peace Plaza to St. John's Church
Rochester, Mn. 55901
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve or disapprove the ADDENDUM licenses and permits.
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second
LICENSES, BONDS & MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES
PAGE
MARCH 6, 2000
ON SALE INTOXICATING LIOtiOR (Annual Renewals
Apple American Lmtd. DBA Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar
Lorraine Corporation DBA Aviary Restaurant
Creative Cuisine Inc. DBA Broadstreet Cafe & Bar/Redwood Room
Brothers Bar & Grill Inc.
RSD Inc. DBA C.J.'S Midtown Lounge
J & S Corporation DBA Canadian Honker Hospitality
Honker Enterprises DBA Canadian Honker Restaurant & Catering
Carlos O'Kelly's Mexican Cafe
Colonial Lanes/Brass Lantern
Southeast Hotel LLC DBA Comfort Inn & Conference Center
Charles Brannon DBA Crown Restaurant & Lounge
Sunstone Hotel Properties Inc. DBA Economy Inn & Executive Suites
D & D of Minnesota Inc. DBA Famous Dave's BBQ Shack
Jorge Solis DBA Fiesta Mexicana Restaurant
J & M'S Family Restaurant, Inc. DBA Shady Hill Grille
CMZ Inc. DBA Henry Wellington's/New't
G.A.C. Development LLC DBA Hilton Garden Inn
Sunstone Hotel Properties Inc. DBA Holiday Inn Downtown
Sonor Hotel Corporation DBA Holiday Inn South
Hunan Chinese Restaurant of Rochester Inc. DBA Hunan Chinese Restaurant
Chen -Si Wang DBA Hunan Garden Restaurant
Hypat's Investment Inc. DBA O'Neill's Pizza Pub
J.J.'S of Rochester Inc. DBA J.J.'S Restaurant & Sports Bar
John Barlev Come Inc.
Sunstone Hotel Properties Inc. DBA Kahler Hotel
Sunstone Hotel Properties Inc. DBA Marriott Hotel
GPK Inc. DBA Kathy's Pub
King's Crossing Bar & Grill Co. Inc.
Rancho Grande Inc. DBA Las Margarita's Bar & Grill
Dooley's Inc. DBA McMurphy's Sports Cafe/Aquarius Nightclub
Michael's Supper Club Inc. DBA Michael's Restaurant
LTB Inc. DBA Nlugzee's
CJC Enterprises Inc. DBA North Star Bar
Outback Midwest II Limited Partnership DBA Outback Steakhouse
BDG5 Limited Partnership DBA Radisson Hotel Centerplace
Recreation Lanes Inc.
GMRI Inc. DBA Red Lobster #429
Associated Management Inc.DBA Riptide Bar
Allen Lloyd Hurlbut DBA Rochescheer Country Pub
Rookies Sports Grill & Bar Inc.
Shenanigan's Inc. C.1.'S Midtown Lounge
Great Western Fair Inc. DBA Smiling Moose Bar & Grill
Restech Partners Inc. DBA TGI Fridays
Timber Lodge Steakhouse Inc.
Victoria's of Minnesota DBA Victoria's Restaurant
Willow Creek Golf Course of Rochester Inc. DBA Willow Creek Golf Course
LICENSES, BONDS AND MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES
PAGE 4
MARCH 6, 2000
CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY (Annual Renewal
Pla-Mor Ballroom
OTHER ANNUAL RENEWALS
Sunday Liquor 52
On -Sale 3.2% Beer 37
Off -Sale 3.2% Beer 15
Dance
Bowling
23
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve or disapprove the above NEW and RENEWAL Licenses.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE: 3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Agenda
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Finance Department
ITEM NO.
D -16,
i i EM DESCRIPTION:
PREPARED BY:
Approval of Accounts Payable
Dale Martinson
Respectfully request a motion to approve payment of Accounts Payable
(submitted separately) in the amount of $1,027,044.88.
Less: Any exceptions
.,OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING,
) 6�00
Organizational / Consent
ITEM D
Human Resources
PREPARED
BY: L Gilsrud
The assignment of Captain Ken Middendorf to the position of Fire Captain/Training effective
January, 2000 and the resulting promotion of Thomas Krueger, Firefighter, to the position of
Fire Captain effective January 8, 2000 and the retirement of Terry Yust, Firefighter, effective
January 30, 2000 created two (2) vacancies for the position of Firefighter.
The Fire Civil Service Commission has submitted the top three (3) certified candidates for
each vacancy and recommends the appointment of one (1) of the three (3) candidates for
each of the vacant positions.
Fire Civil Service Commission Approved
Appointment of Jeffrey P. Drew and Rodney J. Steggerda to the position of Firefighter in the
Rochester Fire Department as soon as possible subject to the candidate's successful
completion of an indepth background investigation, medical and psychological examinations.
-)UNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:_
4LW
IWWA CM RQCHESTER
V,-e
✓oG`ilwell,�Ia
FIRE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
HILLA CLINE GREG WALTERS NORB RYAN HUMAN RESOURCES
201 4th Street SE, Room 295
Rochester, MN 55904-3783
(507) 285-8074
March 3, 2000 FAX X(507) 287-7979
Honorable Council Members,
City Council
City Hall
Rochester, MN 55904
Dear Council Members:
The assignment of Captain Ken Middendorf to the position of Fire Captain 1 Training
effective January, 2000 and the resulting promotion of Thomas Krueger, Firefighter, to the
position of Captain effective January 8, 2000 created a vacancy for the position of
Firefighter.
We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Firefighter
from the following list of qualified candidates:
1. Jeffrey P. Drew
2. Rodney J. Steggerda
3. Martin D. Kath
Fire Chief David Kepler desires to have this appointment effective as soon as possible
subject to the candidate's successful completion of an indepth background investigation,
medical and psychological examinations.
Respectfully Submitted,
A,61
Greg Walters
Secretary
Fire Civil Service Commission
An Equal0pport mty Emp(oyu
h9w
1LPANROCHESTER
ERICA CrtF J
��� ✓�GG/7/1 eJ��2
FIRE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
HILLA CLINE GREG WALTERS NORB RYAN HUMAN RESOURCES
201 4th Street SE, Room 295
Rochester, MN 55904-3783
(507)265-8074
March 3, 2000 FAX #(507) 287-7979
Honorable Council Members
City Council
City Hall
Rochester, MN 55904
Dear Council Members:
The retirement of Terry Yust, Firefighter, effective January 30, 2000 created a vacancy for
the position of Firefighter.
We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Firefighter
from the following list of qualified candidates:
1. Rodney J. Steggerda
2. Marlin D. Kath
3. Todd W. Monahan
Fire Chief David Kapler desires to have this appointment effective as soon as possible
subject to the candidate's successful completion of an indepth background investigation,
medical and psychological examinations.
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Walters
Secretary
Fire Civil Service Commission
An'Eq= Opportunity 2mpfaw
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 4 7
DATE: 3, 6r 00
Organizational / Consent
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Human Resources
d-iq
L Gilsrud
The resignation of Jason Griffith, Police Officer, effective January 14, 2000 and retirement of
Richard Dale, Police Captain, effective January 31, 2000 and the resulting promotions of Brian
Winters to Police Captain, Kenneth Reed to Police Lieutenant, and John Laivell to Police
Sergeant effective February 1, 2000 created two (2) vacancies for the position of Police Officer.
Police Civil Service Commission Approved
Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members
of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed
Steven J. Harvey and Joel F. Blahnik to the position of Police Officer in the Rochester Police
Department effective March 20, 2000.
This information is given to the Council so that Council Members are aware of the
appointments.
uOUNCIL ACTION: root«, by: sad by: to:
RajIF�TER.,'.. M1v4F
0
•�*� AUG •s A
flavor Chuck Canfield
101 Ith Street SE - Room'_181
Rexhester, NIN 55904 3782
Phone (5071285 8080 Fax07, 287-7979
TO: City Administrator
RE: Appointment to Police Department
Based on the Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates for the position of Police Officer, I
am appointing Steven J. Harvey to the position of Police Officer effective
3/20/00
3/1/00
Date
Cc: Director of Human Resources
49
ROCHESTER
✓-11;vwcjala
POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
DON DEALING BOB MOORE JOY FOGARTY
February 1, 2000
Honorable Mayor Canfield
City Hall
Rochester, Minnesota 55904
Dear Mayor Canfield,
The resignation of Jason Griffith, Police Officer, effective January 14, 2000 created a
vacancy for the position of Police Officer.
We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer
from the following list of three (3) names which stand highest on the Police Officer
Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates:
1. Steven J. Harvey
2. Joel F. Blahnik
3. Chad D. Winters
Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that this appointment be effective March, 2000
subject to the candidate's successful completion of an indepth background investigation,
medical and psychological examinations.
Respectfully Submitted,
Bob Moore
Secretary
Police Civil Service Commission
An Equal Opportunity Employer
�R, rtD • AUGUST~• � •'
)lacor Chuck Cantietd
901 }th Street SE - R�x)m 281
Rochester. NIN 55%4 3 8°
Phone: u507, 2858080 Fax: r5071 387-79,9
TO: City Administrator
RE: Appointment to Police Department
Based on the Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates for the position of Police Officer, I
am appointing Joel F. Blahnik to the position of Police Officer effective
3/20/00
Mayor
City of
Cc: Director of Human Resources
3/1/00
Date
ow
1�_ROCHESTER
iG��Lref�t
POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
DON DEALING BOB MOORE JOY FOGARTY
February 15, 2000
Honorable Mayor Canfield
City Hall
Rochester, Minnesota 55904
Dear Mayor Canfield,
51
The retirement of Richard Dale, Police Captain effective January 31, 200 and resulting
promotions of Brian Winters to Police Captain, Kenneth Reed to Police Lieutenant, and
John Laivell to Police Sergeant effective February 1, 2000 created a vacancy for the
position of Police Officer.
We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer
from the following list of three (3) names which stand highest on the Police Officer
Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates:
1. Joel F. Blahnik
2. Chad D. Winters
3, Daniel W. Swanson
Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that this appointment be effective March, 2000
subject to the candidate's successful completion of an indepth background investigation,
medical and psychological examinations.
Respectfully Submitted,
Ole
V
Bob Moore
Secretary
Police Civil Service Commission
An Equ (Oppo=nity Eoq(nyer
Consent
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING ,ya
DATE: 3,600
Local #49, Street and Alley
Human Resources
Wages A justment: 3% wage rate adjustments shall be effective 1/1 in 2000, 2001 and 2002
ITEM NO.
6_4
Linda Gilsrud,f-'�
• The City will make a one-time payment of $60.00 to any Local #49 member who holds a valid Class A commercial
driver's license on 1/1/2000. The $60.00 payment represents approximately the cost of a four-year license renewal.
After 1/1/2000, Local #49 employees who wish to obtain a Class A commercial driver's license must receive
approval to obtain the license in order to be eligible for the $60.00 payment.
• The City will reimburse an employee for the purchase of safety shoes and other personal safety equipment up to
three hundred and thirty dollars ($330.00) during the three-year agreement. Reflective tape will be affixed
to pants and shirts wom by Local #49 employees so they are visible when working after dark.
• The City will purchase one winter safety jacket (lime green) during the term of the agreement for those positions
covered by the agreement that workout of doors. The City will determine the vendor for the winter safety jackets
through the regular bid notification and bid award process.
• Winter and summer shift starting and ending times were identified.
A letter of understanding will be prepared to describe the use of WRP, Local #70 employees to assist in the removal
of snow. The letter of understanding will be an attachment to the agreement.
Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEF7NG 557�
DATE: 3 / 6 / 00
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: n EM NO.4
Organizational Business Mayor's Office �(-1
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPAAED BY:
p ointment to Police Civil Service Commission Mayor Canfiel
I hereby submit for your approval the following appointment to the
Police Civil Service Commission:
Michelle Leak
1904 llth Street SW
Ms. Leak will replace Don Dealing who is moving out of state.
The three year term will run to 04/01/2003.
Reappoint: Robert M. Moore, Jr
170 Salem Point Drive SW
First full three-year appointment to 04/01/03
;OUNCIL ACTION: m, -, ey: Saone W. m
�� �pgftlt4l.. Vlyy
h°. 4UGVST •
\favor Chuck Canfield
201 4th Street SE - Ro,an 281
Rochester. %IN 55904-5782
Phone: 15071285-8080 Fax: i507i 287-7979
CITY OF ROCHESTER
VOLUNTEER APPLICATION
N?: E: Michelle A. Leak
ADDRESS: 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905
?RCNE: Bus.266-0365 HOME 292-5956
DO YOU RESIDE WITHIN ROCHESTER CITY LIMITS? YES x NO -
PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT: Mayo Clinic
I AM SEEKING VOLUNTARY SERVICE ON Police Civil Service Commission
BECAUSE: please see attached.
PEASE PROVIDE BACiCGRUUNO INe0RMATION (EDUCATION, SPECi:1L INTERESTS,
ACHIEVEMENTS, PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT, COMMUNITY INVCLVEMEST) Attach additicnal
information., if desired.
Please see attached _
DATE SUBMITTED: 12/9/99 SIGNED: _ G� LA
Return to: Office of the Mayor
201 4th Street SE
Rochester, MN 55904-3182
............... ................«... .«....................«.....
LATE OF APPO1V-4ENT:
TERM E KRATION:
OTHER DATA:
,
I am seeking voluntary service on the Police Civil Service Commission because:
volunteerism and service are important to me personally and professionally. My personal
commitment to volunteerism and service affords the opportunity for continuous learning
as people come together in a very intentional way to make a difference and a
contribution. Professionally, it is my belief that volunteerism and service are key
leadership attributes that must be nurtured and supported. The Police Civil Service
Commission presents a significant opportunity that is consistent with my personal and
professional values with respect to volunteerism and service. Thank you in advance for
your consideration of my application. I look forward to your reply.
0
MICHELLE A. LEAK-SILKA, MBA
taw) eyz-wDo t-rome 1904 11''Street SW
(507) 266-0365 Work Rochester, MN 5590:
EDUCATION
1989 MBA - Health Care Administration, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
1981 BBA - Human Resource Management, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
1996-Present MAYO MEDICAL CENTER, Rochester, Minnesota. Integrated Medical Center including:
the Mayo Clinic with 336,392 patient registrations per year; 1,040-bed St. Mary's Hospital;
and 555-bed Rochester Methodist Hospital.
CHAIR, Division of Support Services (April,1998 — Present). Reporting to the
Administrator, Mayo Medical Center Rochester to lead 19 support service departments
with an annual operating budget of $42 million, 8 direct reports and 875 FTEs. Specific
areas of responsibility:
Central Appointment Desk
History Desk
Medical Records
Parking Operations
Record Copy and Review
Security
Volunteers
Credit Union
Imprinting
Medical Social Services
Patient & Health Education
Report Summary
Telephone Offices
General Services
Mail Rooms
Office of Patient Affairs
Post Office
Room Reservations
Med.Transcription Service
ADMINISTRATOR, Mayo Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine ( October, 1996-
April 1998).Administrative responsibilities for the Divisions of Allergy, and Outpatient
Infectious Diseases, Hypertension, and Infectious Diseases.
Selected Accomplishments
• In collaboration with physician leader, developed and implemented operational plans
within the Division of Allergy and Outpatient Infectious Diseases to enhance productivity
and revenue generation, and increase patient satisfaction.
• Restructured supervision of allied health staff in the Hypertension Division resulting in
increased productivity and decreased expenses.
• Designed and implemented a self -directed work team for the nursing staff in the Division
of Infectious Diseases, including a rotating Lead RN Physician Extender role.
0 Member of the Hospital Leadership Team.
p
1991 - 1996 MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITALS OF OHIO, Toledo, Ohio. Academic
medical center
including 258-bed acute, 36-bed rehabilitation and 25-bed child and adolescent psychiatric
hospitals.
ASSOCIATE HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATOR (February 1992-October 1996), Reporting to
the Chief Operating Officer to lead 14 support/ancillary services with an annual operating
budget of $37.5 million, 11 direct reports and 700 employees. Specific areas of
responsibility:
Admitting Medical Records Respiratory Therapy
Bio-medical Engineering Patient Representatives Sleep Disorders Center
Dietary Services Pharmacy Social Work Services
Environmental Services Quality and Utilization Management Volunteers Service
Laboratory Radiology
Selected Accomplishments
• Directed Medical Record Department improvement plan resulting in 66% reduction in
incomplete medical records, 70% reduction in discharged not -final -billed balances, and
the establishment of department -wide productivity standards.
• Initiated the development and implementation of an on -going plan to reduce outside
equipment service contracts with first year savings of 14%; negotiated contract cleaning
services for off -site facilities resulting in 30% reduction in labor costs.
• Lead JCAHO accreditation process resulting in score of 96 and three-year accreditation
certificate.
• Formalized and expanded hospital -wide patient satisfaction survey processes.
• Consolidated management and supervision of Respiratory Care and Neurodiagnostic
Services resulting in 30% reduction in labor costs.
• Chairperson of the committee to select an institutional quality improvement model and
member of the steering committee to plan and implement an organizational
transformation process.
• Leader of the competitive repositioning team to develop and implement a process for
achieving $6 million in cost reductions within 6-12 months.
• Upgraded patient registration/patient management system resulting in increased
registration accuracy and decreased accounts receivable days.
• Reorganized Volunteer Services resulting in increased service satisfaction for patients
and their families and staff.
ADMINISTRATIVE FELLOW, (May 199 1 -February 1992). Reporting to the Chief
Operating Officer, chaired the productivity improvement task force and project leader for
non -salary expense reduction initiative which yielded first year annualized savings of
500,000. Administrative responsibilities for the departments of Admitting, Medical Records
and Social Work Services.
1990 - 1992 FLOWER MEMORIAL Hospital, Sylvania, Ohio, 373-bed community hospital including
226 bed nursing home.
HEALTH EDUCATOR
Part-time evening instructor for a community -wide wellness program. Conducted four,
10-week sessions with approximately 10 participants per session. Successful in leading
participants to achieve lifestyle change goals.
1989 - 1990 UNION, INC., Toledo, Ohio. Non-profit, government supported organization responsible for
rehabilitating housing stock and training minorities and women in building trade skills.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Collaborated with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Building &
Construction Trades Union, and the City of Toledo to design and implement a city-wide
housing rehabilitation and skilled trades program. Achieved first year targets to rehabilitate
10 houses and begin apprenticeship training for 10 women.
1987 - 1989 CITY OF TOLEDO, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD
REVITALIZATION.
Division responsible for managing federal, state and local funds for neighborhood
development and revitalization.
MANAGER, ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION OF VACANT HOUSES
PROGRAM
Implemented a new, city-wide 1.5 million housing acquisition and rehabilitation program
resulting in private sector commitment to purchase, rehabilitate and sell houses to low
income families.
1976 - 1987 ST. VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER, Toledo, Ohio. Flagship hospital for 1000+ bed
integrated health care delivery system.
MANAGER, REAL ESTATE SERVICES (1984-1987). Reporting to the Vice President for
Corporate Services, established and managed the Department of Real Estate Services.
Responsible for real estate acquisition, development and management. Established effective
working relationships with neighborhood groups which resulted in the implementation of the
hospital's strategic plan for site development and expansion.
SENIOR UNIT CLERK (1981-1984). Supervisory responsibilities for 25 unit clerks.
UNIT CLERK (1976-1981). Responsible for non -nursing support activities including:
transcribing physician orders, ordering supplies, and maintaining schedules.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 4
1997-Present Minnesota Medical Group 'Management Association, '.Member
,991-Present American College of Health Care Executives, Member
1994 - 1996 American Society for Quality Control, Health Care Division, Regional Counselor
1991 - 1996 Health Care Executives of Northwest Ohio, Member
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
1997-Present Rochester Leadership 2000, Graduate
Rochester Better Chance, Board Member and Secretary
1990 - 1996 Junior League of Toledo, Inc., Board Member, Vice President Community Projects and
Chair Nominating Committee
City of Toledo Parks Commission, Member
Ohio Parks and Recreation Association, Member
Leadership Toledo, Participant
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL
ACT10N
A/E E 1NG %3
DATE: 030600
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
I EIA NO.
Organizational
Business
Mayor's
Office
cao
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
PREPARED BY:
Appointment to
HOusing and Redevelopment
Authority
Mayor Canfiel
I hereby submit for your approval the following appointment to the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority:
Pamela Evans
2522 Viking Drive NW
Ms. Evans will fill the vacancy created by the resignation of
Sack VanStraaten. The unexpired term will run to December 31, 2001.
:OUNCIL ACTION: mmian dr• s.m+a by m
PM
%layor Chuck Canfield
201 4th Street SE - Room 281
R(xhester, 11 N ..35904-3 i 82
VOLUNTEER APPLICATION
NAIME: PAMELA EVANS
ADDRESS: 2522 VIKING DR NW ROCHESTER MN 55901
2:10NE: SUS.507)281-7604 HOME 507)281-3M$
DO YOU RESIDE WITHIN ROCHESTER CITY LIMITS? ':ESX NO
PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT: FIRST ALLIANCE CREDIT UNION
'_ ?M SF,EKIPIG VOLUNTARY SERVICE CM HRA
BECAUSE: I BELIEVE HOUSING (AFFORDABLE HOUSING) IS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE AS
WELL AS AN OVERLOOKED ISSUE IN ROCHESTER. I FURTHER BELIEVE BRA NEEDS
Mum RETRE-SENIAITON IN ROCHESTER, AS W= AS , OTHER DES TO DISPELL
THE MISCONCEPTION THAT ALL AFFORDABLE HOUSING EQUATES TO SLUMS, GHETTOS AND
GANG INVOLVED RESIDENCES
PLEAEF. PROVIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION (EDUCATIGN, SPECIAL INTERESTS,
ACHIE'JEMENTS, PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT, COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT) Attach aaditi,,cal
infornaticn, .: desired.
I AM CURRENTLY EMPLOYED AS THE MORTGAGE LOAN REP FOR FIRST ALLIANCE CREDIT UNION.
I HAVE SERVED ONE TERM ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FOR OLMSTED COUNTY(THIS WAS
-ft FOSfTl-MEEfYin"Ttmn- WHICH WERE IN THE
EVEFIINGS) _
I DESIRE TO BE INVOLVED IN THE COMMUNITY, AS HOUSING IS A RIGHT FOR ALL OF US
uEff e-iI6eSE TO if .
DATE SUBMITTED: 1/24/00 S
Return to: Office of the Mayor
201 4th Street SE
Rochester, MN 55904-3782
DATE OF APPOINTMENT:
TERM EXPIRATION
OTHER CATA:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING
DATE:
4^ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. A ��
CONSENT AGENDA PARK AND RECREATION f�
ITEM DESCRIPTION: SHELTER/RESTROOM FACILITY AT THE SILVER LAKE
ADVENTURE PLAYGROUND
PREPARED BY:
ROYSUTHERLAND
In the 2000 CIP program, there was $200,000 for the construction of a shelter/bathroom
at the Silver Lake Adventure Playground. Bids were opened on February 24, 2000 and
the low bid came in $95,000 over the estimate.
The bid package contained a number of deduct alternates. We are proposing that we
accept $30,823 worth of deducts. This will bring the construction cost down to $264,903.
Prior to bidding the project, we have secured a donation of $150,000 from the Oddfellows
organization and a grant of $50,000 from the DNR. After the bid opening, we received a
pledge from the Kiwanis Clubs for an additional $25,000. We also have $5000 coming
from the Target Corporation for some playground equipment that we installed and paid
for in 1999.
We are proposing that we proceed with this project and take the balance needed out of
the F.E. Williams Fund. At the present time there is $285,000 in this fund. We are committed
to keeping the balance of the fund above $200,000.
We need to do this project and we need to build something that the community can be
proud of. With the donations and the use of the F.E. Williams Fund, we can build a
first-class facility and not use any tax dollars.
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL:
APPROVE THE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE SILVER LAKE SHELTEPJRESTROOM
PROJECT.
COUNCIL ACTION: r o. b, 5a ny
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %IEET!NG (07 �
DATE: 3 6 ou
Consent Agenda I Police
i i EM DESCRIPTION: Donation From NIN Chapter of ARNA
ITEM NO.
p - Aa--
PREPARED BY:
Roger Peterson
The Minnesota Chapter of American Registered Nurses Association has donated $100 to the Rochester Police
Department to be used for printing of brochures used at employment job fairs.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve acceptance of $100 from American Registered Nurses Association for printing expenses.
Appropriate to 4110-13020.
_OUNCIL ACTION: Motion ey Seoond by!_
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE: /6100
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO.
Public Works D . ,2 3
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Feasibility Report of Sanitary Sewer Trunkmain Extension to PREPARED BY:
serve Sewer Districts 12c1 & 15i1 along 18`" Avenue SW M. Nigbur �
The City received a petition for the extension of sanitary sewer trunkmain from its current terminus
point, lying 3200 linear feet east of 18" Avenue SW, through an existing natural ravine to an area lying
1100 feet Southwest of 18'" Avenue SW.
Staff has determined the project is feasible only if the petitioner pays a sewer availability charge of
$100,000. Even with the petitioner's upfront payment of the availability charges together with the City's
anticipated share of the project is only 54% of the of the upfront funding is committed. The 54%
funding commitment falls short of the 60% guideline used by the Council for economic feasibility. Staff
believes this segment of sanitary sewer cannot be constructed through a typical development process
due to the minimal amount of assessable frontage for the project. Therefore, to allow development of
property within these sewer districts which are a part of the City's Urban Service Area this sewer must
be constructed as a public improvement project.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt a resolution accepting the Feasibility and order the project to be made if the petitioner, and/or
other interested parties, executes a contribution agreement for the sewer availability charge of
$100,000. This resolution should also authorize staff to retain professional consultants for the design of
the project and to acquire the needed land rights for the project through donation, negotiated
acquisition (up to 10% above the appraised value) or through the 90 day Quick Take condemnation
procedure.
.;OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
10 REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF A PROPOSED /
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR THE
SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
TO SERVE VACANT LANDS LYING BETWEEN
32"fDSTREET SW AND 36T11 STREET SW ALONG
18T" AVENUE SW
March 2, 2000
Honorable Mayor & Common Council
City of Rochester, Minnesota
A resolution proposing the following project:
Extension of Sanitary Sewer to serve vacant lands within the City's 20 year Urban
Service Area lying along 18'h Avenue SW between 32°" and 36' Street SW. A petition
has been filed with the City Clerk and forwarded to the Public Works Department by the
City Council on October 4, 1999.
Feasibility Report
We report the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The
location of this project is within an area proposed for both Residential and Commercial
development. Development of the area is increasing due to the City's recent investment
and construction of Phase I of a sanitary sewer trunkmain from TH 63 South westerly to
serve the Greystone Development. Continued development interest within this area
requires the Phase II and Phase III trunkmain construction. This project would allow the
properties to develop on public sewer and watermain instead of though an interim private
lift station.
This project has not been budgeted for in the City's Capital Improvement Program. The
costs of this project should be paid from connection and availability fees collected from
the benefiting properties.
The proposed project (Phase II & III) consists of the extension and installation of 10 inch
sanitary sewer line currently located approximately 3200 linear feet East of 18'h Avenue
SW. The sewer would be extended West through the existing natural ravine to 18'
Avenue SW (Phase II) and then proceed 1100 feet Southwesterly in the ravine (Phase III).
The extension to the West of 18' avenue is needed to allow the petitioner to connect to
the sanitary sewer. The total length of the Phase II & III sanitary sewer extension project
is approximately 4075 feet excluding the 18' Avenue roadway crossing. The abutting
area served by the sewer extension is estimated at 120 buildable acres. The ultimate area
served by the trunk main project in the sewer district sub -basin is estimated at 170 - 200
acres.
-I-
NIARCH 2, -'%C0
This report and the estimated costs for the project are prepared without the benefit of field
surveys, soils boring or completed plans and specifications:
Project Cost . Phase II &III
Construction Items Lffiffi Cost/Unit Total Cost
Street Construction
Bit Pavement Removal SY
0
3
$0.00
Bituminous Base & Wearing Course - Tons
0
30
$0.00
Concrete Curb - LF
0
10
$0.00
Aggregate Base CY
0
15
$0.00
Cleanng/Grubbing/Seeding/Restoration
Lump
10000
$10,000.00
Utility Construction
Manholes
12
2000
$24,000.00
Catch Basin
0
1000
$0.00
Aprons
0
500
$0.00
Hydrants
0
150P
$0.00
F & I Sewer Pipe - LF
4075
37
$150,775.00
F & I Watermain - LF
0
30
$0.00
F & I Storm Sewer - LF
0
0
$0.00
Utility Service Line(s) SewerMater
0
1000
$0.00
Granular Backfill CY
0
5
$0.00
B" X 4" Wye/Tee
0
75
$0.00
18th Avenue Crossing
1
40000
$40,000.00
Sub Total
$224,775,00
Engineering/Contingency/Interest 30%
$67,432.50
TOTAL
$292,207,50
Total less service connections
$292,207,50
REVENUE SOURCES
Revenue Sources
Total Revenue
Connection/Assessment Charge
$35,403.51
Water Availability Charge
$0.00
Future Sewer Availability Charge $96,803.99
Availablity Charges Applicable to
Petitioner $100,000.00
City Share $60,000.00
TOTAL $292,207.50
I01W
i
-3-
MARCH 2, 3CCC
The total assessable frontage for the sewer project is estimated at 2050 front feet.
However, according to the adopted policy there may be certain maximum payments,
which would apply to some of the parcels.
The Sewer Availability fee for each parcel is based upon $2500.00 per acre.
The City's share, of $60,000 for the Project, includes oversizing of the pipes, unassessble
frontage, and the extended financing cost resulting from the un-collected availability fees
and connection charges after the project is completed.
We recommend that the necessary costs to be collected for this project be done so in
accordance with the existing connection charge policies and a $2500.00 per acre sewer
availability fee for these Sewer Districts areas. The petitioner is requesting service prior
to the orderly extension of sanitary sewer to his property so they may commence
development immediately. We would recommend the petitioner pay their entire sewer
availability fee prior to the commencement of sewer extension project.
For this project to proceed the petitioner should enter into a development agreement. One
of the components of the agreement shall be the collection of the proportionate share of
the costs attributable to this project. This is estimated to be the Sewer Availability charge
for 40 acres or $100,000
Though the City has an investment in the infrastructure in this area for this current project
and the previous Phase I project, the City will recoup its total share of the project costs as
additional lands, lying in the 170-200 acre sanitary sewer sub -district, develop and pay
their availability charges.
Submitted for your consideration:
'.Michael J.Nigbur,EA
Land Development Manager
Douglas son, PE
Engineering Manager
- 4 - :MARCH 2, 2000
BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Project No: Date (Orig.)
J No:
Description: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain extension to serve undeveloped land along 181"
Avenue SW
Contract
Project Cost Summary Project Budget Cost Final Cost
Roadway
$0.00
Sanitary Sewer
$174,775.00
Water Main
$0.00
Storm Sewer
$0.00
Services
$0.00
Restoration
$10, 000.00
18th Avenue Crossing
$40,000.00
Subtotal
$224, 775.00
Engineering/Cont./ Interest
$67,432.50
Total Construction & Expense $292,207.50
Project Connection Rate $40.42
Distribution
To be presently collected $100,000.00
To be deferred/postponed $132,207.50
City's Share $60,000.00
Utility Share $0.00
Municipal State Aid $0.00
Total $292,207.50
Revenue Sources Total Revenue
Future Connection Charge $35,403.51
Iq
Petitior
- 5 - MARCH ?, -'-CO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING 14
DATE: 3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
ORIGINATING DEPT:
..'EM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract; South Park Fifth Su
Public Works
ITEM NO.
D-;L4
PREPARED BY:
M. Nigb74
Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council:
South Park Fifth Subdivision - Ratzloff-Bigelow (Owner) & Elcor Construction (Contractor) are
requesting a City / Owner Contract J9675 consisting of "Basic Construction to Serve South Park
Fifth Subdivision".
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9675
"Basic Construction to Serve South Park Fifth Subdivision"
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE:
Ig '
3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works
D-a 5
EM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve
PREPARED BY:
Pinewood Road S.E. Area J9577
J. Loehr
Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., February 23, 2000 for the following local improvement
project:
Proiect No. 9714-99, J9577
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve 22ntl Avenue S.E., 23"' Avenue S.E., 251"
Avenue S.E., and 26"Avenue S.E. South of Pinewood Road S.E.; Fairview Court S.E. North of
Pinewood Road S.E.; and in Pinewood Road S.E. from Fairview Court S.E. to a Point East of 300
Avenue S.E. to Serve a Residence Located at 3020 Pinewood Road S.E."
The following bids were received:
1. A-1 Excavating $1,331,596.30 (Low Bidder)
2. Winona Excavating $1,394,860.70
3. S.J. Louis $1,466,840.50
4. Swenke Company $1,483,680.90
5. Richard Knutson $1,627,144.11
6. Kenko, Inc. $1,667,377.60
7. Elcor Construction $1,696,128.50
8. Barbarossa & Sons $1,717,941.20
9. Road Constructors $1,738,523.95
10. Heselton Construction $1,939,5%25
11. McKiniss Excavating $2,178,004.50
Engineers Estimate $1,510,787.50
The project is proposed to be funded from sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges and
Sales Tax Revenue, consistent with the City of Rochester Water Quality Protection Program adopted
by the City Council on December 21, 1998.
This project involves the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve 114 developed single
family residential properties located in the Pinewood Road S.E. Area, and storm sewer and street
improvements to 23nd Avenue S.E. to serve a private development. On October 18, 1999 the City
Council authorized staff to execute an Assessment Agreement with Quinstar, Schoenfelders Southstar
for the 23m Avenue private development work.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted awarding the contract to A-1
Excavating.
Att: Feasibility Report
Location Map
JUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
b
PINEWOOD ROAD S.E. AREA - PHASE I r-- --
I ,
PROJECT NO. 9714-99, J9577 -
I
4a'
I
I
_ QUINSTAR — l I
Qi
77
I
!II�
-�
I
22" AVENUE S.E.
ST
NOTE:
PROPOSED PROJECT AREA IS IN BORDERED AREA.
?. PROJECT PETITIONED FOR LOTS HIGHLIGHTED.
,
23RD AVENUE S.E. (PINEWOOD ROAD AREA)
NOTE:
1. PROPOSED PROJECT IN BORDERED AREA
2. LOTS PETITIONED FOR ARE SHADED.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE
3l6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works
D-oZ(0
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve
PREPARED BY:
Riverview Heights and Cheval Lane N.E., J9536 & J9588
J. Loehr
Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., February 23, 2000 for the follo ing local improvement
project:
Project No. 9829 (J9536)
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Riverview Heights Subdivision"
Project No. 9913 (J9588)
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Cheval Lane N.E."
The following bids were received:
1. Winona Excavating $ 288,205.74 (Low Bidder)
2. Winona Mechanical $ 320,279.50
3. Swenke Company $ 346,660.00
4. A-1 Excavating $ 401,109.30
5. Elcor Construction $ 405,882.00
6. Barbarossa & Sons $ 424,215.50
7. Road Constructors $ 438,038.85
8. McKiniss Excavating $ 492,833.50
Engineers Estimate $ 387,813.00
The project is proposed to be funded from sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges and
Sales Tax Revenue, consistent with the City of Rochester Water Quality Protection Program adopted
by the City Council on December 21, 1998.
This project involves the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve 12 developed single
family residential properties in the Riverview Heights area and 3 developed single family residential
properties in the Cheval Lane area.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted awarding the contract to Winona
Excavating.
Aft: Feasibility Report
Location Map
. CIUNCIL ACTION: Motion by, Second by: to:
REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TO SERVE RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION.
October 29, 1998
Honorable Mayor & Common Council
City of Rochester, Mimmesota
A petition for sanitary sewer and watermain to serve Riverview Heights Subdivision was forwarded by
the Council at their October 5, 1998 meeting to the Public Works Department for the development of a
feasibility report. For this feasibility report the petition was checked and was found to be in proper form
and was signed by l I of the 13 property owners representing 87 percent of the proposed assessable
frontage abutting the project -
Feasibility liy Report
We report that the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The 16cation of
this project is within an area of existing development that currently lacks public intiastrttcture including
sewer and water lines. Because of this Iack of public sewer and water there is the threat of ground water
contamination as the existing septic systems begin to fail. This project would allow existing residents to
connect to public sewer and water instead of replacing their old systems when they fail.
This project has not been budgeted for. The costs of this project are proposed to be paid from connection
fees and availability charges collected from the benefiting properties and from city reserve funds.
The proposed project consists of the installation of an 8 inch sanitary sewer line and a 8 inch watermain.
Public Sewer and water are available at the west property line of Lot 12 and would be extended easterly
through lot 12, approximately 130 it to the west property line of lot 11. Public Sewer and water for Lots
15, 16, 18-26 would be extended southerly from existing mains in East River Road, approximately 900
feet, and brought up the hill to serve those lots.
I -
Project Location Map
i
ST
Project No. 9913, J9588
w
"Sanitary Sewer and Watem-ain Extensioni
to Serve the Cheval Lane N. E. Area"
10
-_I
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Public Works
i
MEE7NG S�
DATE: 3/6/00
ITEM NO.
0-a7
,.'EM DESCRIPTION: Engineering Services Contract with WHKS for Inspection PREPARED BY:
Services for Riverview Heights & Cheval Lane, J9536 & J9588 Jul J. Loehr I
This is a proposal by WHKS & Co. to provide engineering services (staking, inspection, and testing) for
the following local improvement project:
Project No. 9829 09536)
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Riverview Heights Subdivision"
Project No. 9913 (J95881
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Cheval Lane N.E."
WHKS is recommended for this work since they provided the engineering design services for the
project and have met with the property owners to discuss the project. Therefore, WHKS is familiar with
the project and the needs of the property owners. WHKS is capable of providing the desired level of
staking, inspection and testing for this project.
The negotiated professional fees are as follows:
J9536 Riverview Heights
Actual Cost Not to Exceed
$22,078
J9588 Cheval Lane
Actual Cost Not to Exceed $ 8,759
Total for J9536 & J9588 Actual Cost Not to Exceed $30,837
The award of contract for this project is scheduled for March 6, 2000. Execution of this Engineering
Service Agreement is conditioned on this award of contract.
The project costs will be recovered by Utility Connection Agreements and sales tax revenue.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
If the City Council approves the proposal, a resolution could be adopted authorizing the execution of an
Engineering Service Agreement with WHKS & Co.
Attachment: WHKS & Company Letter of Proposal
i3OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
ME
90?
3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT CENDA
Public Works
,A g
EM DESCRIPTION: Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve
P EPARED BY:
Baihly Woodland Subdivision, J9599
J. Loehr
This is the Feasibility Report for the construction of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve Baihly
Woodland Subdivision in a project described as follows:
Pro iect No. M002. J9599
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve Baihly Woodland Subdivision."
The estimated construction costs and expense of this project are as follows:
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $ 460,362
Service Connections 27,450
Sub -Total $ 487,812
Engineering/Interest/Contingencies 146,344
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 634,156
The Baihly Woodland sewer and water extension project is included in and listed on page 361 of the
2000 Capital Budget.
The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection
Agreements), Sales Tax revenue, Developer and/or City -Owner Contract Agreements, and the Sewer
and Water Utility.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Adopt a resolution accepting the Feasibility Report.
2. Adopt a resolution establishing a Project Hearing for April 3, 2000.
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to
REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TO SERVE BAIHLY WOODLAND SUBDIVISION.
February 28, 2000
Honorable Mayor & Common Council
City of Rochester, Minnesota
A petition for sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the Baihly Woodland Subdivision was forwarded by
the City Council at their meeting of April 19, 1999 to the Public Works Department for the preparation
of a Feasibility Report. The petition was checked and found to be in proper form and was signed by 16 of
21 property owners of lots containing a single-family residential dwelling. This represents 76.2 percent
of the lots within the Baihly Woodland Area that are eligible to participate in the City of Rochester,
Water Quality Protection Program adopted by the City Council on December 21, 1999. The Baihly
Woodland Area also includes one undeveloped residential lot and one undeveloped large parcel that the
property owner intends to develop in 2000.
Feasibility Report
We report that the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The location of
this project is within an area of existing single family residential development that currently lacks public
sanitary sewer and watermain. A majority of the septic systems and wells within the Area were
constructed prior to the State of Minnesota and Olmsted County having any requirements or standards
for construction of septic systems and wells. The lots are typically under''/2 acre in size and are unable to
absorb the nitrates created from the septic systems. There is an increasing threat of contamination to the
City of Rochester's ground water supply as the existing septic systems and wells begin to fail. This
project would allow property owners of lots containing existing single-family residential dwellings to
connect to public sanitary sewer and water systems rather than replacing their old systems when they
fail. This project also allows the undeveloped property to develop with public sewer and watermain
The costs of this project are proposed to be recovered through sanitary sewer and watermain connection
charges (Utility Connection Agreements), sales tax revenue appropriated to the City of Rochester, Water
Quality Protection Program, Developer and/or City -Owner Contract Agreements, and the Sewer and
Water Utility.
The proposed project consists of the installation of an 8-inch sanitary sewer line and an 8-inch watermain
in Woodland Drive S.W. and in the Salem Road S.W. north frontage road from County Road No. 8 to the
east end of Baihly Woodland Subdivision.
Public sanitary sewer is available on the north side of the intersection of County Road No. 8 (Bamber
Valley Road) and Salem Road S.W. Sanitary sewer will be extended from that location to the east to
serve Baihly Woodland Subdivision. Watermain are currently available in Woodland Hills Drive S.W. at
the east -end of Baihly Woodland Subdivision. Watermain will be extended from that location to serve
the Subdivision. Therefore, an extension of trunkline sanitary sewer or trunk watermain is not required to
serve Baihly Woodland Subdivision.
Eb
The estimated construction costs and expenses of the proiect made without completed plans or survey are
as follows:
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $ 601,156
Sewer Service Connection Stub -Outs $750 per service x 22 services $ 16,500
Water Service Connection Stub -out $750 per service x 22 services $ 16,500
Estimated Cost of the Project $ 634,156
The estimated oroiect costs are proposed to be funded as follows:
Utility Connection Agreements $ 180,166
Developer / City Owner Contract Agreement
Sewer and Water in North Frontage Road (763 feet x $66.30 per foot = $50,587)
Sewer and Water in Woodland Drive (398 feet x $66.30 per foot = $26,387) $ 76,974
Sewer Utiliri (50% of frontage road sewer costs, as there is only one frontage to charge)
Sewer West of Woodland Drive (932 feet x $46 per foot = $42,872)
Sewer East of Woodland Drive (866 feet x $46 per foot = $39,836) 82,708
Water Utility (50% of frontage road water costs, as there is one frontage to charge)
Water East of Woodland Drive (866 feet x $41 per foot = $35,506) 35,506
Sales Tax Revenue (see below) $ 258,802
Estimated Project Costs $ 634,156
Amount of sales tax revenue required for the Project
Sales Tax (Rate Cap and per Lot Cap) $ 227,302
Sales Tax (Sewer Service Connection Stub -Out Allowances) 21 services x $750/serv. $ 15,750
Sales Tax (Water Service Stub -Out Allowances)21 services x $750/serv. $ 15,750
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Funding Required for Construction of Project $ 258,802
Estimated additional sales tax revenue required for work on private property
Of the 22 lots within the project area 21 lots contain a single-family residential dwelling. These lots are
eligible for allowances through the Water Quality Protection Program as follows:
Sewer Service Lateral
21 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
21,000
Water Service Lateral
21 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
21,000
Well Closure
21 lots x $1,100 per lot
$
21,000
Septic Closure
21 lots x $ 500 per lot
$
10,500
Estimated Amount of Sales
Tax Revenue Required for Allowances
$
73,500
For Work on Private Property
Estimated sales tax revenue required for construction of Project and Allowances
Estimated Amount Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of the Project $ 258,802
Estimated Amount of. Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances $ 73,500
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Construction of the Project and $ 332,302
Allowances for Work on Private Property
We recommend that the necessary funding to construct sanitary sewer, watermain and service
connections in the Baihly Woodland Area be done so in accordance with the City of Rochester's existing
sanitary sewer and watermain connection charge policies and the Water Quality Protection Program.
Property owners that desire to participate in the Water Quality Protection Program and the benefits
contained therein, are required to:
1. Enter into a Utility Connection Agreement with the City within three (3) years of the date the City
initiates the project.
2. Connect the existing single family residential dwelling to the public sewer and water systems within
five (5) years of the date of project initiation.
3. Consent to annexation of their property no sooner than five (5) years from the date sanitary sewer and
watermain is available to serve their property.
Submitted for your consideration:
Jam M. oehr,
W r Q lity Protection Program
Project Manager
Doug Nelson, PE
Manager of Engineering
0
BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Project No: M0002
J No: 9599
Date (Orig.) 2/28/2000
Description: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Extension to Serve Baihly Woodland Subdivision
Project Contract Final
Budget Cost Cost
Construction
Sanitary Sewer & Watermain $ 460,362
Service Connections
Engineering/Interest/Contingency
Total Construction & Expense
Cost Distribution
Anticipated Utility Connection Agreements
Future Developer and/or City -Owner
Contract Agreement
Sewer Utility
Water Utility
Sales Tax Funding
TOTAL_
Make Initial Disbursement from P. I. R. Fund
27,450
146,344
$ 634,156
$ 180,166
76,974
82,708
35,506
258,802
$ 634,156
q32000 CAPITAL BUDGET - - - - PRO,;'cCT DETAIL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT: CAT CDE PROJ NO. ASSG NO.
Sewer and Water 65 9599 959
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT TITLE:
Construct Sewer and Water
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT LOCATION:
Saihly Woodland
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION:
Sewer and water to serve Haihly Woodland.
--------------------------
-------------------
PROJECT SUMMARY
--`---------
------------
---------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
1
YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST:
652,614
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
,. _.
PROJECT
FINANCING IN FISCAL
YEAR 2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEMO ONLY
CURRENT
-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIOR
CAPITAL
MATCHING
TOTAL
SOURCE OF FUNDS
AUTH.
BUDGET
FUNDS
CURRENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Assessment Bonds
249,759
249,759
Sales Tax
402 855
402,855
TOTAL
402,855 _
249,759
652,614
a -361
AGENDA SECTION:
EM DESCRIPTION:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
CONSENT AGENDA
Woodland Hills Subdivision, J9602
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Public Works
MEETING b
DATE: -! /6/00
ITEM NO.
D-aI
to Serve PREPARED BY:
/%.,.� J. Loehr
k�
This is the Feasibility Report for the construction of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve Woodland
Hills Subdivision in a project described as follows:
Project No. N1005. J9602
"Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision (Woodcrest Lane S.W.)."
The estimated construction costs and expense of this project are as follows:
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $ 111,688
Service Connections 6,923
Sub -Total $ 118,611
Engineering/Interest/Contingencies 35,583
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 154,194
The Woodland Hills sewer and water extension project is included in and listed on page 363 of the
2000 Capital Budget.
The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection
Agreements), Sales Tax revenue, and the Sewer and Water Utility.
An Orderly Annexation Agreement has not been finalized with the Rochester Town Board for this
Subdivision. The Orderly Annexation Agreement must be finalized or the property owners must petition
for annexation prior to the construction of this project.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Adopt a resolution accepting the Feasibility Report.
2. Adopt a resolution establishing a Project Hearing for April 3, 2000.
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by
4 Yt
ti
S ^.
4.Z T
REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED �?
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TO SERVE WOODLAND HILLS SUBDIVISION.
February 28, 2000
Honorable Mayor & Common Council
City of Rochester, Minnesota
A petition for sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the Baihly Woodland Subdivision was forwarded by
the City Council at their meeting of June 21. 1999 to the Public Works Department for the preparation of
a Feasibility Report. The petition was checked and found to be in proper form and was signed by 6 of 6
property owners of lots containing a single-family residential dwelling. This represents 100 percent of
the lots within Woodland Hills Subdivision that are eligible to participate in the City of Rochester, Water
Quality Protection Program adopted by the City Council on December 21, 1999. Woodland Hills
Subdivision Area also includes one undevelopable parcel located along the east edge of Woodcrest Lane
S.W.
Feasibilitv Reoort
We report that the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The location of
this project is within an area of existing single family residential development that currently lacks public
sanitary sewer and watermain. A majority of the septic systems and wells within the Area were
constructed prior to the State of Minnesota and Olmsted County having any requirements or standards
for construction of septic systems and wells. The lots are typically under %z acre in size and are unable to
absorb the nitrates created from the septic systems. There is an increasing threat of contamination to the
City of Rochester's ground water supply as the existing septic systems and wells begin to fail. This
project would allow property owners of lots containing existing single-family residential dwellings to
connect to public sanitary sewer and water systems rather than replacing their old systems when they
fail. This project also allows the undeveloped property to develop with public sewer and watermain
The costs of this project are proposed to be recovered through sanitary sewer and watermain connection
charges (Utility Connection Agreements), Sales Tar revenue appropriated to the City of Rochester,
Water Quality Protection Program, and the Sewer and Water Utility.
The proposed project consists of the installation of an 8-inch sanitary sewer line and an 8-inch watermain
in the following roadways:
1. Sewer and water in Woodcrest Lane S.W. from the north line of Woodland Hills Subdivision
to the south line of Woodland Hills Subdivision.
Public sanitary sewer and watermain is available at the north line of Woodland Hills Subdivision.
Therefore, the extension of trunkline sanitary sewer or trunk watermain is not required to serve the
Subdivision.
The estimated construction costs and expenses of the project made without completed plans or survey are
as follows:
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $ 145,194
Sewer Service Connection Stub -Outs $750 per service x 6 services $ 4,500
Water Service Connection Stub -out $750 per service x 6 services $ 4,500
Estimated Cost of the Project $ 154,194
The estimated project costs are proposed to be funded as follows:
Utilitv Connection Agreements $ 51,086
Sewer Utilitv (50% of frontage road sewer costs, as there is only one frontage to charge)
750 feet x $46 per foot $ 34,500
Water Utility (50% of frontage road water costs, as there is one frontage to charge)
730 feet x $41 per foot $ 29,930
Sales Tax Revenue (see below) 38,678
Estimated Project Costs $ 154,194
Amount of sales tax revenue required for the Project
Sales Tax (Rate Cap and per Lot Cap) $ 29,678
Sales Tax (Sewer Service Connection Stub -Out Allowances) 6 services x $750/serv. $ 4,500
Sales Tax (Water Service Stub -Out Allowances)6 services x $750/serv. $ 4,500
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Funding Required for Construction of Project $ 38,678
Estimated additional sales tax revenue required for work on Private property
Of the 6 lots within the project area 6 lots contain a single-family residential dwelling. These lots are
eligible for allowances through the Water Quality Protection Program as follows:
Sewer Service Lateral
6 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
6,000
Water Service Lateral
6 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
6,000
Well Closure
6 lots x $1,100 per lot
$
6,000
Septic Closure
6 lots x $ 500 per lot
$
3,000
Estimated Amount of Sales
Tax Revenue Required for Allowances
$
21,000
For Work on Private Property
Estimated sales tax revenue required for construction of Project and Allowances
Estimated Amount Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of the Project $ 38,678
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances $ 21,000
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Construction of the Project and $ 59,678
Allowances for Work on Private Property
We recommend that the necessary funding to construct sanitary sewer, watermain and service
connections in Woodland Hills Subdivision be done so in accordance with the City of Rochester's
existing sanitary sewer and watermain connection charge policies and the Water Quality Protection
Program. Property owners that desire to participate in the Water Quality Protection Program and the
benefits contained therein, are required to:
1. Enter into a Utility Connection Agreement with the City within three (3) years of the date the City
initiates the project.
2. Connect the existing single family residential dwelling to the public sewer and water systems within
five (5) years of the date of project initiation.
3. Consent to annexation of their property no sooner than five (5) years from the date sanitary sewer and
watermain is available to serve their property.
Submitted for your consideration:
b. 4
Ja s M. oehr,
W ter Q ality Protection Program
Project Manager
Doug Nelson, PE
Manager of Engineering
BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Project No: M0005 Date (Orig.) 2/28/2000
J No: 9602
Description: Sanitary Sewer & Waterman Extension to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision
Woodcrest Lane S.W.
Construction
Sanitary Sewer & Watermain
Service Connections
Engineerinq/l nterest/Continaencv
Total Construction & Expense
Cost Distribution
Anticipated Utility Connection Agreements
Sewer Utility
Water Utility
Sales Tax Funding
TOTAL
Make Initial Disbursement from P. I. R. Fund
Project Contract Final
Budget Cost Cost
$ 111,688
6,923
35,583
$ 154,194
M,7:r
34,500
29,930
38,678
$ 154,194
1
T 1
--hJ
1
---------2000 CAPITAL BUDGET - - - -----------PROJECT DETAIL (01
---' ------------- — ---------
DEPARTMENT: CAT CDE PROJ NO. ASSG NO.
Sewerand Water ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
PROJECT TITLE:
Construct Sewer and Water
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT LOCATION:
Woodland Hills Subdivision
------------- — ---------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION:
Sewer and water to serve Woodland Hills Subdivision.
---------------
PROJECT SUMMARY
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
1
YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
185,729
PROJECT
______________________________________________________________________________
FINANCING IN FISCAL
YEAR 2000
-----__________________________________________________________________________
MEMO ONLY
C U R
R E N T
PRIOR
CAPITAL
MATCHING
TOTAL
SOURCE OF FUNDS
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTH.
BUDGET
FUNDS
CURRENT
Special Assessment Bonds
40,937
40,937
---Sales Tax
144,792
144,792
TOTAL
144,792
40,937
185,729
-363-
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING 103 1-1
DATE: 3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works
I
D � 30
i EM DESCRIPTION: Feasibility Report for Sanitary Sewer to Serve Marvale Addition
p EPARED BY:
and Whynaught's Subdivision, J9600
J. Loehr r
This is the Feasibility Report requested by the City Council for the extension of sanitary sewer to serve
Marvale Addition and Whynaught's Subdivision in a project described as follows:
Project No. M0003, J9600
"Sanitary Sewer to Serve Marvale Addition and Whynaught's Subdivision".
The estimated construction costs and expense of this project are as follows:
Sanitary Sewer $ 783,654
Service Connections 86,538
Engineering/Interest/Contingencies 261,058
Total Estimated Project Cost $1,131,250
The Marvale Addition and Whynaught's Subdivision sewer project is included in and listed on page 357
of the 2000 Capital Budget.
The project is proposed to be funded from Utility Connection Agreements and Sales Tax revenue.
An Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City of Rochester and Marion Township is finalized.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Adopt a resolution accepting the Feasibility Report.
2. Adopt a resolution establishing a Project Hearing for April 3, 2000.
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to:
JDq
REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
TO SERVE MARVALE AND WHYNAUGHT COURT
February 28, 2C00
Honorable Mayor & Common Council
City of Rochester, Minnesota
A petition for the extension of sanitary sewer to serve Marvale Addition and Whynaught Subdivision
were forwarded by the City Council at their meeting of April 5, 1999 and February 23, 2000 respectively
to the Public Works Department for the preparation of Feasibility Reports. The petitions were checked
and found to be in proper form and were signed by 76 of 124 property owners of lots containing a single-
family residential dwelling and one developed commercial property. This represents 61 percent of the
developed lots within Marvale Addition and Whynaught Subdivision that are eligible to participate in the
City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program adopted by the City Council on December 21,
1999.
Feasibilitv Report
We report that the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The location of
this project is within an area of existing single family residential and commercial development that is
currently served by public watermain, but lacks public sanitary sewer. A majority of the septic systems
within Marvale Addition and Whynaught Subdivision were constructed prior to the State of Minnesota
and Olmsted County having any requirements or standards for construction of septic systems and wells.
The lots are typically under %2 acre in size and are unable to absorb the nitrates created from the septic
systems. There is an increasing threat of contamination to the City of Rochester's ground water supply as
the existing septic systems and wells begin to fail. This project would allow property owners of lots
containing an existing single-family residential dwellings or a commercial building to connect to public
sanitary sewer rather than replacing their old systems when they fail.
The costs of this project are proposed to be recovered through sanitary sewer connection charges (Utility
Connection Agreements) and from sales tax revenue appropriated to the City of Rochester, Water
Quality Protection Program.
The proposed project consists of the extension of an 8-inch sanitary sewer line from Marion Road S.E. in
Marvale Addition and from Marion Road S.E. in Whynaught Subdivision. A public trunkline sanitary
sewer to serve this are (project J9598) is scheduled for construction in 2000.
The estimated construction costs and expenses for the project made without completed plans or survey
are as follows:
Sanitary Sewer 8,150 feet x $125.00 per centerline foot $1,018,750
Sewer Service Connection Stub -Outs $750 per service x 137 services $ 102,750
Water Service Connection Stub -out $750 per service x l3 services $ 9,750
Estimated Cost of Marvale Addition Project $1,131,250
The estimated proiect costs for Marvale Addition are proposed to be funded as follows:
Utility Connection Agreements $ 470.214
Sales Tax Revenue (see below) $ 661,036
Estimated Project Costs $1,131,250
Amount of sales tax revenue required for construction of Project
Sales Tax (Rate Cap and per Lot Cap) $ 563,536
Sales Tax (Sewer Service Connection Stub -Out Allowances) $ 95,250
Sales Tax (Water Service Stub -Out Allowances) $ 2,250
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Funding Required for Construction of $ 661,036
Marvale Addition Project
Estimated additional sales tax revenue required for work on private property
Of the 131 lots within the project area 124 lots contain a single-family residential dwelling. These lots
are eligible for allowances through the Water Quality Protection Program as follows:
Sewer Service Lateral
124 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
124,000
Water Service Lateral
3 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
3,000
Well Closure
3 lots x $1,000 per lot
$
3,000
Septic Closure
124 lots x $ 500per lot
$
62,000
Estimated Amount of Sales
Tax Revenue Required for Allowances
$
192,000
For Work on Private Property
Estimated sales tax revenue required for construction of Proiect and Allowances
Estimated Amount Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of Project $ 661,036
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances $ 192,000
Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Construction of Project and $ 853,036
Allowances for Work on Private Property
We recommend that the necessary funding to construct sanitary sewer, watermain and service
connections in Marvale Addition and Whynaught Subdivision be done so in accordance with the City of
Rochester's existing sanitary sewer and watermain connection charge policies and the Water Quality
Protection Program. Property owners that desire to participate in the Water Quality Protection Program
and the benefits contained therein, are required to:
1. Enter into a Utility Connection Agreement with the City within three (3) years of the date the City
initiates the project.
2. Connect the existing single family residential dwelling to the public sewer and water systems within
five (5) years of the date of project initiation.
3. Consent to annexation of their property no sooner than five (5) years from the date sanitary sewer and
watermain is available to serve their property.
6(o
Submitted for your consideration:
J-'O. k
Jame . L ehr, Project Manager
Water Quality Protection Program
Doug Nelson, PE
Manager of Engineering
1007 '
BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Project No: M0003
J No: 9600
Date (Orig.) 2/15/2000
Description: Sanitary Sewer to Serve Marvale Addition and Whvnaught's Subdivision
Project Contract Final
Budget Cost Cost
Construction
Sanitary Sewer
Service Connections
Engineering/Interest/Contingency
Total Construction & Expense
Cost Distribution
Anticipated Utility Connection Agreements
Sales Tax Funding
TOTAL
Make Initial Disbursement from P. I. R. Fund
$ 783,654
86,538
261,058
$1,131,250
$ 470,214
661,036
$1,131,250
O-------_-2000 CAPITAL BUDGET - -------------- JE PROCT DETA:L
` ---------------------- /
DEPARTMENT: CAT CDE PROD NO. ASSG NO.
Sewer and Water 65 9600 955
_______________________________________________ ,
PROJECT TITLE:
Construct Sewer and Water
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT LOCATION:
Marvale Addition and Whynaught Subdivision
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION:
Sewer to serve Marvels Addition and Whynaught Subdivision.
PROJECT SUMMARY
'-'--'--------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
1
YEAR AUTHORIZED: 2000
TOTAL COST:
1,146,844
--_-ESTIMATED
--------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT
FINANCING IN FISCAL
YEAR 2000
------------------------------
---------------------
MEMO ONLY
-----------
C U R
----------------
R E N T
________________________________________________
PRIOR
CAPITAL
MATCHING
TOTAL
SOURCE OF FUNDS
AUTH•
BUDGET
FUNDS
C'
____-------------------------------
Special Assessment Bonds
-______
--__-__
________
451,182
_
451,182
Sales Tax
695,662
695,662
TOTAL
695,662
451,132
1,146,844
-357-
tol
i
9 3 -< 34 3
y
5 7
f '
VELOD
T SSE
5-
5, 5 1 7 3
I
3
l
9
5
4 ' 16
3 3
1
15 ; at 223, aa\
:2v11 13 14 ..
,i�LL 15
C" 4 a
4
I
x 13
2
19 19 B 1 9 ^ :1 '.2
'c"' 6
17/
is
h a
9
1 3 4,5 6 1 717 15
j 15 ,\ 9
!
i 'dELRO.S.E ST'SE,
`
• ` �j L5 i
a j l a 3 a 5 5 7 8 i 9 I 0 a L2 13 '.' '-4
a c
3I, 6% 7 j 3
2 AHY.�'.tiUGHT SE
N r
BOBS TRAILER camr
9i '
:4
12 13
EXHIBIT A
WHKS . Co. ==
PR71 WATER MAIN
SCALE IN FEET
FAD SANITARY SEVER
M,II,F:N OMf.N 116N IYI�s/
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING ((j
DATE: 3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
. EM DESCRIPTION:
Advertise for Bid
Emulsion CRS-2
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Public Works
ITEM NO.
D-3I
Cutback Asphalt RC-800 and Asphalt I PREPARED BY;
K. Harms
The Rochester Public Works Department requests the approval for the City Clerk to Advertise for the
2000 Season Supply of Cutback Asphalt RC-800 and Asphalt Emulsion CRS-2 (Cationic).
The City Council approved funding for these materials in the 2000 Budget.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Give approval to the City Clerk to advertise for the bidding of the 2000 Season Supply of Cutback
Asphalt RC-800 and Asphalt Emulsion CII (Cationic).
;OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by Second by.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING v /
DATE: I2000
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
EM DESCRIPTION: Advertise for Bids:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Public Works
inous Materials
ITEM NO.
D- 3�
PREPARED BY:f .
K. Harms
The Rochester Public Works Department requests the approval for the City Clerk to Advertise for the
2000 Season Supply of Plant Mixed Bituminous Mixtures.
The City Council approved funding for these materials in the 2000 Budget.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Give approval to the City Clerk to advertise for the bidding of the 2000 Season Supply of Plant Mixed
Bituminous Mixtures.
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %IEETING JIS'
DATE: 3/6/2000
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
ORIGINATING DEPT:
i i'EM DESCRIPTION: Advertise for Bids: Ready -Mixed Concrete
Public Works
ITEM NO.
D-33
PREPARED
K.Han
The Rochester Public Works Department requests the approval for the City Clerk to Advertise for the
2000 Season Supply of Ready -Mixed Concrete.
The City Council approved funding for these materials in the 2000 Budget.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Give approval to the City Clerk to advertise for the bidding of the 2000 Season Supply of Ready -Mixed
Concrete.
_OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING 117 /
DATE: 3/6/00
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT:
CONSENT AGENDA Public Works
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Advertise for Bids: Washed Sand, Gravel, Crushed Rock
Gravel
ITEM NO.
D-34
& Pea PREPARED BY:
K. Harms
The Rochester Public Works Department requests the approval for the City Clerk to Advertise for the
2000 Season Supply of Washed Sand, Gravel, Crushed Rock & Pea Gravel
The City Council approved funding for these materials in the 2000 Budget.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Give approval to the City Clerk to advertise for the bidding of the 2000 Season Supply of Washed
Sand, Gravel and Crushed Rock & Pea Gravel.
. OUNCIL ACTION: Motion bv: second
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE
16i00
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
ITEM NO.
CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works
O _ 35
i i EM DESCRIPTION: Second Street Ramp Year 2000 Structural Condition Report &
PREPARED BY:'
Recommendations
477 D. Rossman
The City retained the firm of BKBM Professional Engineers" of Minneapolis to provide professional
engineering services for City Project 8215-31-2000 (J2594) — 2000 Restoration of the Second Street
Ramp. This review has been completed, and BKBM has issued their report. The following is quoted from
their report; " The structure is judged adequate to safely support the loads as required by the
Minnesota State Building Code."
However, there are necessary preventative maintenance items and alterations that should be completed in
2000. These are funded as City Project 8215-31-2000 (J-2594) and are listed on page 342 of the City
Budget. The project budget is $150,000. Staff recommends that BKBM Professional Engineers be
authorized to prepare plans, detailed specifications, and estimates on the work listed below. The project
schedule reflects the plans to be prepared by mid -April and bids to be received in May and the work to be
completed by October 1, 2000.
1) Recommended Maintenance: Complete all the items listed below. These are taken from pages 27,28
& 29 of the report, and include repair to the tops and bottoms of the parking decks, seal random
cracks, replace failed expansion joints, recoat the waterproofing membrane in the drive isles, reseal
the drive surface on the exit helix, painting, seal all doors and windows, and repair masonry cracks.
2) Recommended Modifications: Also include the following modifications that are desirable
improvements to this ramp, paint the underside of all decks, install windows in the southwest
stairtower, replace the emergency exit lights, replace the lighting in the southwest tower, install fire
alarm detection equipment in the north tower, and install guest assistance stations. These were not
included in the original budget requests. Staff recommends that they be added to the project at this
time and that additional funds be allocated for this extra work.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1) Accept the year 2000 structural engineering condition survey report of the Second Street Ramp
prepared by BKBM Professional Engineers" of Minneapolis.
2) Authorize BKBM to prepare plans and specifications and perform project inspections for the
recommended maintenance and modifications, for a fee not to exceed $24,050.
3) Increase the project budget to $ 290,000 with the additional funds of $ 140,000 to be transferred from
the parking enterprise fund.
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
REPORT ON FINDINGS
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
CONDITION SURVEY
AT THE
SECOND STREET
PARKING GARAGE
ROCHESTER ,,NIINNESOTA
CITY PROJECT 8215-31-2000 (J2594)
BKBM Job No. 00208.00
February 24, 2000
Prepared by:
BAKKE KOPP BALLOU & MCFARLIN rNC
219 North Second Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612)333-7101
Presented to:
Mr. Dave Rossman
Department of Public Works
201 4'^ Street SE, Room 108
Rochester, Minnesota 55904-3740
(507) 281-6008
I hereby certify on and that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervisi
duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi
that I am a
nnesota.
Reg. No. 1°S1? Date PCbr�.r
2.4 ?000
W-1
i
O
O
�
O
O
O
a
N
O
T
ID
(D
y�
o
0
0
0o
ao
0
0000
o
roaDao
11
O
O
V)
O
O
0
0
O
fA
0
0
Co
¢o
CS
O
d
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
c0
*�
61
(v
(D
V)
to
CO
(0
IT(D
d
(O
to
N
(D
(D
(O
N
p
(p
(O
N
N
(h
Gd
N
N
(D
O
cc
N
L
N
'a
fA
to
49
Vi
r
to
fA
fR
N
Co
(O
(11)
Vi
to
7
V)
fA
V)
V;
6%
V)
m
LL
Coco
O
o
O
d
O
o
O
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
CD
'D0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
V)
0
0
0
O
O
a
0
eA
CD0
0
0
0
O
fA
O
(D
LD
u)
O
(D
1D
O
l0
C
C
O
0
0
0
O
(o
o
a
a
V)
to
0
0
0
u7
coO
-W�
CD
N
LO
co
N
r
CD
C
N
r-
N
O
O
V
V
O
U
M
M
V)
V)
(O
r
V!
N
!A
V)
N
V
O
Vf
Vi
M
0
Q
N
N
(O
N
V)
di
fA
V)
to6%
V!
b)
di
NN
Vf
V)
(V�
O
-
a
0
0
0
0
coo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
y
0
0
V)
O
coo
O
in
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
R
H
O
O)
O
_O
0
0
O
I�
[V
CD
0)
101
L
O
n
CDN
N
V)
N
V)
Ntl�
V!
fV4
to,
N
'
'aO
O
O
O
O
O
O
00
a
O
O
C.a
CD
O
O
O
CD
G
a)0
0
0
0
0
Vi
0
0
0
V)
O
CD
CD
O
CD
N
to
LO
0
m
to
O
(D
(D
O
iD
CD
O
O
O
cO
M)
Q
r
Ix
c
dD
(Dr
(o
O
N
(O
(D
N
('i
N
N
m
N
M
,
V
V
m
fD
0
a
O)
df
M
w
V!
V!
O
w
fA
V)
N
r
d!
Vf
V!
Vf
64
V)
fA
ds
E
d'
w
E
0
�i
O
o
O
O
O
O
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
to
aO
00
V)
Vi
to
Vf
fA
IA
6%
(A
Vi
064
Vi
Vf
V>
(»
O
00
CD
O
y
O
0
o.rnMr)
(D
N
M
m
r`
O
C
N
N
d)
df
Vi
NM
,
Co
C
fA
y
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
Q
o
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
O
O
CD
co
C
y)
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
a
4
0
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
O
O
(D
O
O,
M
NI
La
D)
D
p
io
C
�D
iA
o
O
O
O
a
Imo-
O
O
O
O
h-
0
0
U)
O
O
O
O
'A
O
N
(m
O
r
to
r
U
r
O
O
0)
N
O
C()
N
f--
N
O
(D
to
to
O
CO
LL)
N
r
r
N
C7
R
M
M
Nog
C
N
in
VM
W9,
N<
Vf
P-
N
N
Vi
(A
r
M
(+)
(()
N
r
N
O
0
r
N
CO
O
r
9
O
0
Vf
Vi
1
fH
Vf
Vf
to
Vi
r
Vi
Vf
V►
N
V)
Vf
df
N
C7
=
Vi
V!
m
C
Vi
Vf
Vi
V3,
V!
V)
V!
y
EE
w
E
y
m
U
0a
y
C
y
Lp
o
D
d
i
C
d`
m
Y
y
N
C
a8
41
fVn)
0o
ypeG�
�
XGC
b
Mo
CoQN7D
UaCO
0)
c
y
o
vN)
)
d1ON�
E
d
N
0.Wm
yD
.0
.0
o
o
E
N
I
Y.
O
9
C
>
XX
W
V
H�0 '.
m
3
C
C
4
C
CL
l
�
M
1L.
O
�R
NC
()
9
w
UC
❑
L
0
Dd
O,O
a
O
N
N
O
O
C
C
C
C
O)
C'
N
aN
y
W
d
w
in
c
Q
n
Jfn
r
N
CO
V
(D
fo
n
CO
Cl)
7
11i
(D
r
N
('1
V10
(D
I+
U
_p
U
fr
_
y
7
C
ll.i
�
N
U
�
O
�
p
V
C
L
td
E
co
tJ
U`
W
W
V
$'
Q
Co
C>
W
LL
AGENDA SECTION:
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Public Works
Trade School
MEETING ',1
3'
DATE: 3-06-00
ITEM NO.
D-36
PREPARED BY:
m D. Rossmar
The City has received a request to make several changes to on street parking adjacent to St. Johns Grade
School at 424 West Center Street. The school has recently increased in student population and staff size.
The growth has brought with it an increase in traffic congestion around the school during the normal
school day. The school hours are 9:00 am to 3:45 pm. Several incidents have occurred which are
connected with double parking activities that have led the school officials to request parking changes
adjacent to the school.
The School PTA formed a parents committee to study the situation. They met with City staff and have
reached a consensus on changes needed to improve the safety of parent loading zones, staff parking, bus
loading zones and walking routes. The following items came out of the school zone safety study:
1. Concentrate the parent loading activities onto the north side of First Street SW from 4ih Avenue to 6'
Avenue. This would require changing seven parking spaces from 10 hour metered parking to 15 minute
passenger loading zone, 7:00 am to 4:00 pm School Days only. This would increase the number of
passenger loading spaces from 6 to 12 spaces. The school has committed resources to remove the snow
banks in the wintertime. The new loading zones would be monitored closely to determine if all the double
parking is eliminated.
2. Allow all day -metered parking on 6' Avenue to replace that removed on First Street.
3. Expand the school bus loading zone on West Center Street to allow room for 5 school buses. The
remainder will be 10 hour metered parking.
Staff recommendation: Staff has reviewed the requests and recommend in favor of requests number 1 &
3 and that these be implemented at once. Staff would recommend that number 2 be delayed until the
completion of the Mayo Clinic construction projects along 3rd & 4' Avenues. These construction projects
have shifted additional traffic west onto 6' Avenue. The on -street capacity is needed at this time during
the morning and evening rush hours.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
A) Adopt the prepared resolution amending paragraphs (10) and (15) of Section E "Passenger Loading
Zones" of the Comprehensive Traffic And Parking Resolution Book, to read;
(10) Delete. This is the existing passenger loading zone on West Center Street.
(20) First Street SW on the north side of the street, from 4" Avenue to a point 450 feet west of 4"
Avenue 15 minute limit, 7:00 am to 4:00 pm scoho�l days only. K ^tr h a
B) Adopt the prepared resolution amending paragraph (7) of Section I "Meteted Parking ( Zone J —10
hour limit)" of the Comprehensive Traffic And Parking Resolution Book, to read;
(7) First Street SW, on both sides from 5'b Avenue to 6m Avenue.
(18) Sixth Avenue SW, on the east side of the street, from Center Street to First Street.
Q Delete paragraph (142.5) 6' Avenue SW / 10 block of Section "B" No Parking Zones.
'OUNCILACTION: Motion by: second
Y
7
:�.�.,.. s- x1.
REQUEST FOR COUNT CIL ACTION MEETING 1,�S'
--
DATE: 3/6/2000
AGENDA SECTION:
Consent Aeenda
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Water Reclamation Plant
1999 Piping Replacement
Change Order No. 1
ITEM NO:
D- 3*7
PREPARED BY:
Lyle J. Zimmerman
The contract for this work assumed that the existing pipe hangers could be reused with the new piping.
Because of the change in piping materials the diameter of the pipe changed requiring replacement of the
hangers. The cost for this change is as follows
Original Contract Amount $42,500.00
Change Order No. 1 961.54
Revised Contract Amount $43.461.54
It is requested that the contract with Hohn Brothers Plumbing and Heating, Inc. be modified by Change
Order No. 1 in the amount of $961.54 increase in price
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by:
To:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION %1EE- i';1,7
i
-ATE:
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: I ITEM N0--0
PUBLIC HEAR[VGS PLANN-1,NG
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Type III, Phase I, Final Plat #00-08 to be known as Yate's First PREPARED BY:
Subdivision. The Plat proposes to subdivide approximately one acre of land into Theresa Fogarty.
three lots for single family dwellings. Located west of 23id Avenue SW and south of Planner
5" Street SW.
March 1, 2000
Planning Department Review and Recommendation
1. See attached staff report dated March 2, 2000.
Council Action Needed:
1. Continue this item to March 20, 2000.
Distribution: LIP-
1 . City Administrator '
2. City Clerk
3. City Attorney
4. Planning Department File
5. Planning Department, GIS Division
6. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on Mondav, March 6, 2000 in
the Council Chambers at the Rochester / Olmsted County Government Center.
7. Gregory G. Griffin (GGG)
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
PUBLIC HEARINGS
MEETING �aq
DATE: 3-6-00
TING DEPT: ITEM NO.
PLANNING e. , aZ
iiEM DESCRIPTION: General Development Plan #145 Salem Heights
Mitzi A. Baker,
March 1, 2000
City Plannino and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission considered this GOP at a public hearing on February 9, 2000.
Motion by Schultze, seconded by Staver to approve GDP #145 with the following conditions and modifications, motion
carried 7.0.
1. Storm water management must be addmeeed for this development As indicated in the narrative submitted with the GDP,
the applicant Intends to participate in the City's Regional Storm Water Management Plan. If the City accepts participation,
storm water management fees will apply. Storm sewer routing and drainage information must be provided to the City. The
developme t ust mini pact on the
2. At the time of plaffing, additional right-of-weyy Way need tollfe dedicated to accommodate theuurree design of the frontage
road and its potential access to Salem Road. In addition, controlled access must be provided along the entire length of
Salem Road SW The east side of the frontage road at Woodland Drive may either be in alignment as shown on the GDP or
may continue in its present alignment, as appropriate, based on access to Salem Road.
3. The most westerly cu-de-sac is shown to straddle two properties and the bulb Is partly within property currently owned by
the County. When this property is platted, partial dedication of the right-of-way will not be acceptable. The plat will either
need to be signed by multiple property owners or the roadway will need to be shifted entirely on the Yanish property with
access and utilities provided to the abutting property to the west
4. The applicant shall address the intended use and ownership of the "Outlots" labeled along the north property line.
5. A revised GDP shall be filled with the Planning Department that identifies a future trail along the north side of the frontage
road, and boundaries of the approved zoning district amendments. Upon a decision by the County regarding access from
the westerly end of the frontage road to Salem Road, the applicant shall file a revised GDP with the Planning Department
reflecting the future configuration of the frontage road and any additional right-of-way that may be needed.
6. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Rochester that outlines the obligations of the
applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm water management; park dedication, which shall be cash in lieu of land; traffic
Improvements; pedestrian facilities; contributions for public infrastructure, including improvements to Woodland Drive SW.
7. Additional information will be required at the time of platting, demonstrating that the new intersection an Woodland Drive
SW, at the northeast corner of this property, will meet the subdivision criteria for vertical and horizontal curves.
8. A detailed Wetland Delineation report and a replacement plan are required if the applicant intends to rill or drain wetlands.
Planning Staff Recommendation: � �„�„� �_S (} le Z-
See attached staff report dated February 4, 2000 /J
Council Action Needed:
If the Council wishes to proceed with the general development plan as proposed, it should instruct the
City Attorney to prepare a resolution, with findings, for Council approval.
.;OUNCILACTION- Motion by: Second by: to:
d 1N3WdOl3A30 lVb3NTD
Jkll"
ViOSINNIW'b3153HMV J I
I i i fii9, 1 SIHO13H W31VS
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Planner
DATE: February 4, 2000
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507/285-8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADDRESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGlHRA
507/255-8224
BUILDING CODE
507/285-8213
WELUSEPTIC
507/285-8345
FAX
5071287-2275
RE: General Development Plan #145 to be known as Salem Heights
Ptanning Department Review:
Applicant/Owner: Ron Yanish
1807 7's St. NW
Rochester, MN 55901
Consultants: Yaggy Colby Associates
717 Third Ave. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Size and Location: The property is located north of Salem Rd. SW and
west of Woodland Lane SW.
Existing Land Use: The site is presently undeveloped.
Proposed Use: The General Development Plan includes
approximately 27.5 acres of land with a majority
planned for single family detached development.
Zone change requests are being considered
concurrent with the GDP and include a request to
develop approximately 5.41 acres in the R-2 zoning
district and approximately 1 acre in the B-5 zoning
district.
Land Use Plan: The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan
designates this property as suitable for "low density
residential" types of development.
Zoning: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Mixed Single
Family). Zone change petitions for the southeast
comer of the site are being considered concurrent
with the GDP to allow for R-2 and B-5 zoning in the
southeastern portion of the property.
Streets: Access to the property will be from Woodland Drive
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTVNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
SW and the existing frontage road. The Frontage
road currently has access to Salem Rd. at Woodland
Drive and at the west end of this property. The
County has planned to close the westerly frontage
road access to Salem Rd. along with re -alignment
and reconstruction of Bamber Valley Rd, and its
intersection with Salem Rd. The consultant doing the
project design has been requested to review the
feasibility of maintaining that access, however. It's
possible that this option will be very difficult and very
costly to do. The consultant is scheduled to provide
additional information to the County later this month.
(See comments from Planning Department
Transportation Division for more detail).
The GOP proposes to vacate the eastern portion of
the frontage road and dedicate new right-of-way,
moving the intersection with Woodland Drive to the
north.
Public roads are proposed with this GDP, including
two cul-de-sacs.
Sidewalks: Sidewalk will be required on both sides of the
roadways and along the north side of the frontage
road.
Drainage: The General Development Plan identifies existing
topography. The property generally drains to the
south-southeast. A drainageway cuts through the
west -central portion of the property. At this time,
there are no on -site detention ponds planned. The
applicant has stated that they will request voluntary
participation in the City's Regional Stormwater
Management Plan. Additional information will be
needed by the City Public Works Department to
determine if the property will qualify for participation in
the Regional Plan. A detention pond is identified in
the extreme southeast comer of the property, which
may provide some needed detention.
Detailed grading and drainage plans will also be
required when the property is platted or developed.
Wetlands: Hydric soils exist according to the Soil Survey. The
consultant has established wetland boundaries and
staff has conducted a preliminary on -site review. A
detailed delineation report and replacement plan will
be required if the applicant intends to fill or drain the
Wetlands.
Public Utilities: Services are, or will be, available to serve this
property. A portion of this site will be served by the
high-level water system that will be extended from the
northwest comer of the property, Main level service
will be available from the southwest comer of the
133
Page 3
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
property
Parkland Dedication: Parkland dedication requirements for this
development need to be satisfied via cash dedication
in
lieu of land.
Referral Comments: 1.
Rochester Public Works (see attached)
2.
Planning Dept, Transportation Div. (see attached)
3.
John Harford, Planning Dept. & Wetlands RGU
(see attached)
4.
Rochester Park & Recreation (see attached)
5.
Olmsted County Public Works (see attached)
6.
RPU Water Division (see attached)
7.
Olmsted County SWCD (see attached)
Report Attachments: 1.
Copy of General Development Plan
2.
Referral Comments (7)
3.
Proposed General Development Plan Narrative
4.
See Zoning District Amendment #99-20 for a
summary of the neighborhood meeting
Summary:
This GDP includes approximately 27.5 acres and proposes to develop low density residential
development (both R-1 and R-2) and also proposes Residential -Commercial development.
Access to the site will be provided from Woodland Drive SW and the frontage road. Although the
frontage road currently has access to Salem Rd. at its west end, that access may close in the
future. The intersection of the existing frontage road is proposed to be moved further north. This
would require vacating a portion of the existing roadway. The County will be reconstructing
Bamber Valley Road and is reviewing the feasibility of designs. The County is exploring the option
of keeping the west frontage road access open but will not have additional information from the
Consultant util later in February. The uncertainty of the access to Salem Road, from the frontage
road, makes it very difficult to support a Residential -Commercial use on the property at this time.
In addition, a determination to maintain the westerly frontage road access to Salem Road will
likely require dedication of additional right-of-way to provide to accommodate redesigning and
bulbing the frontage road to the north.
Stormwater management for this property may include voluntary participation in the City's
Regional Storm Water Management Plan. The feasibility of participation will need to be reviewed
further with the City, If participation is not feasible, additional storm water management will need
to be addressed on -site.
Zoning District amendments are being considered for this property concurrent with the GDP.
Staff Suggested Findings and Recommendation:
and Recommendation•
Paragraph 61.215 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual lists the
criteria for approval of a general development plan (see attached section from the newly adopted
regulations, which became affective May 15, 1999.
Criteria A. The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and zoning map, or that the means for reconciling any differences have
Page 4
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
1 3S
been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously with a rezoning or
plan amendment request.
Land uses within the GDP would be consistent with the "low density residential"
land use designation for the property. The location and access for the proposed
Residential -Commercial (2-5) portion of the property may not be appropriate for
this location, however. Zoning District amendments are being considered
concurrent with this GDP application.
Criteria B. The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation
are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent
property.
Excluding the proposed Residential-Commerciai (B-5) portion of the
development, the lot sizes, density, access and circulation appear compatible
with the existing and future use of adjacent property. Since the design of the
Samber Valley Rd. and Salem Rd. intersection are still under review, the
feasibility of maintaining an access from the frontage road to Salem Rd. at the
west end of this property is unknown. Without the access, the Residential -
Commercial (B-5) portion of the development does not meet the site location
criteria for several uses within the B-5 district.
Criteria C. The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans.
The mix of housing is consistent with the adopted Land Use Plan and is also
consistent with the Housing Plan standards for the physical and social
environments of residential neighborhoods.
Criteria D. The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and
streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6-Year Capital Improvement
Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation
Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City.
Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and
projected background traffic are compatible with the existing uses and uses
shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties.
Access to the site will be provided from Woodland Drive SW and the frontage
road. Although the frontage road currently has access to Salem Rd. at its west
end, that access may close in the future. The intersection of the existing frontage
road is proposed to be moved further north. This would require vacating a portion
of the existing roadway. The County will be reconstructing Bamber Valley Road
and is reviewing the feasibility of different designs. The County is exploring the
option of keeping the west frontage road access open but will not have additional
information from the Consultant util later in February. The uncertainty of the
access to Salem Road, from the frontage road, makes it very difficult to support a
Residential -Commercial use on the property at this time. In addition, a
determination to maintain the westerly frontage road access to Salem Road will
likely require dedication of additional right -of --way to provide to accommodate
redesigning and bulbing the frontage road to the north.
cPage 5
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
Criteria E. On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the
development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will
provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those
adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance.
Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to
safely accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the
existing and proposed street system without creating safety hazards,
generating auto stacking that blocks driveways or intersections, or
disrupting traffic flow on any street, as identified in the traffic impact
report, if required by Section 61.523(C). Capacity from improvements in
the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the assessment of
adequacy.
Improvements to Woodland Drive SW will be needed as a result of the
proposed development. The applicant will need to enter into a
Development Agreement with the City that will outline the developers
responsibility for improvements to this roadway.
Section 64.127 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land
Development Manual (LDM) addresses limitations for trip generation on
specified types of roadways. Section 64.127, 9 limits cul-de-sac roads
to 300 average daily trips (ADT). The single family portion of this
development has only one access to Woodland Drive SW and can be
considered to be on one cul-de-sac, although there are two bulbs.
Depending on how the adjacent property to the west develops, this
roadway may exceed 300 ADT, as planned. Staff suggests that the
topographic limitations of this property and the abutting property to the
west make it extremely difficult to achieve access to another roadway.
Although 300 ROT may be exceeded, the volumes would still be below
500 ADT, which is the volume limitation for a development with only one
access (64.127, 10). Emergency services has not expressed concern
over the length of the cul-de-sac at this time. Due to the unique
topographic limitations and low traffic volumes, staff and the City
Engineer suggest that the proposed roadways and projected trips can
be considered acceptable.
Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land
use, or that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities
to serve the area of the proposed development and such utilities are in
the first three years of the City's current 6-Year Capital Improvements
Program, or that other arrangements (contractual, development
agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to ensure that
adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If
needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed
development, the applicant for the development approval shall stipulate
to a condition that no development will occur and no further development
permit will be issued until concurrency has been evidenced.
Services are, or will be available to serve this property. A portion of this
site will be served by the high-level water system, which will be extended
from the northwest corner of the property. Main level service will be
available from the southwest comer of the property.
Page 6
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
3. The adequacy of
service standards
development.
other public facilities shall be based on the level of
in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for
Sidewalk will be required on both sides of all new public roadways and
along the north side of the frontage road.
Stormwater management will need to be reviewed further for this
property. The applicant is interested in voluntary participation toward the
City's Regional Storm Water Management Plan. Additional grading and
drainage information will be required to determine whether participation
will be feasible or if on -site detention will be required.
Criteria F. The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices, or that, at the time of land
subdivision, a more detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to
solve unusual problems that have been identified.
Stormwater management for this property may include voluntary participation in
the City's Regional Storm Water Management Plan. The feasibility of
participation will need to be reviewed further with the City. If participation is not
feasible, additional storm water management will need to be addressed on -site.
Criteria G. The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for
residential development are consistent with the subdivision design standards
contained in Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned
development of adjacent parcels.
The lot, block and street layout and density appear to be generally consistent with
the land use and zoning classifications for this property. There are however a few
concerns. One is that the most westerly cul-de-sac is shown to straddle two
properties and the bulb is partly within property currently owned by the County.
When this property is platted, partial dedication of the right-of-way will not be
acceptable. The Plat would either need to be signed by multiple property owners
or the roadway will need to be shifted entirely on the Yanish property with access
and utilities provided to the abutting property to the west. Another concern is the
"Outlots"shown along the north boundary of the GDP. The applicant will need to
address their purpose.
Recommendation:
Staff has reviewed this proposed GDP and recommends the following conditions or
modifications to assure compliance with the Rochester Zoning Ordfnance and Land
Development Manual and applicable criteria:
1. Stormwater Management must be addressed for this development. As indicated in the
narrative submitted with the GDP, the applicant intends to participate in the City's
Regional Storm Water Management Plan. If the City accepts participation, Stormwater
Management fees will apply. Storm sewer routing and drainage information must be
provided to the City. The development must minimize impact on the adjacent property.
2q Page 7
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
2. At the time of Platting, additional right-of-way may need to be dedicated to
accommodate the future design of the frontage road and its potential access to Salem
Road. In addition, controlled access must be provided along the entire length of Salem
Rd. SW.
3. The most westerly cul-de-sac is shown to straddle two properties and the bulb is partly
within property currently owned by the County. When this property is platted, partial
dedication of the right-of-way will not be acceptable. The Plat will either need to be
signed by multiple property owners or the roadway will need to be shifted entirely on
the Yanish property with access and utilities provided to the abutting property to the
west.
4. The applicant shall address the intended use and ownership of the "Outlots" labeled
along the north property line.
5. A revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department that identifies future
pedestrian facilities along the north side of the frontage road, potential pedestrian trail
along Salem Rd., and boundaries of the approved zoning district amendments. Upon a
decision by the County regarding access from the westerly end of the frontage road to
Salem Road, the applicant shall rile a revised GDP with the Planning Department
reflecting the future configuration of the frontage road and any additional right-of-way
that may be needed.
6. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Rochester that
outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to; storm water
management; park dedication, which shalt be cash in lieu of land; traffic
improvements; pedestrian facilities; contributions for public infrastructure, including
improvements to Woodland Dr. NWW,
7. Additional information will be required at the time of platting demonstrating that the
new intersection on Woodland Dr. SW, at the northeast comer of this property will
meet the subdivision criteria for vertical and horizontal curves.
8. A detailed Wetland Delineation report and a replacement plan are required if the
applicant intends to rill or drain Wetlands.
ROCHESTER
Minnesota
3/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
*FINAL REVISIONS 2/3/00*
131
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 40 Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507.287-7800
FAX — 507-281.6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the revised application for a General
Development Plan #145.on the Ron Yanish (Salem Heights) property. The following are
the Public Works comments on the proposal. Note: REVISED comments are shown
in BOLD:
Stormwater Management must be addressed for this development. As
indicated in the narrative submitted with the GDP plan, the applicant intends
to participate in the Regional Storm Water Management Plan. If participation
is accepted by the City, Stormwater Management Fees will apply. Storm
sewer routing and drainage information must be provided. The development
must minimize the impact on the adjacent property.
2. In addition to the possible access closure of Woodland Drive to Salem Rd
SW (CSAH 22), controlled access must be provided along the entire length of
Salem Rd SW.
3. Coordination of platting and construction of the proposed right-of-way for the
north / south road, along the west property line, must be resolved with the
adjacent property prior to platting.
4. A development agreement will be required to address in part, the developer's
responsibility for improvements to Woodland Dr SW that are needed as a
result of the proposed development, and associated traffic.
5. Pedestrian facilities shall be constructed consistent with City Standards,
along both sides of all public roadways within the development, and along the
north side of the frontage road and the west side of Woodland Dr SW.
6. Execution of a City / Owner Contract will be required prior to construction of
public infrastructure.
C:%TEMP%GGP 145Rev2-00.doc
140 ROCHESTER
Minnesota
2,100
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 40 Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281.6216
7. The feasibility of extending the frontage road west to connect to the new
intersection of CSAH 8 (Bamber Valley Road) and CSAH 22 is unknown at
this time. Depending on the outcome of the realignment, and connection
with the frontage road, the area shown as B-5 may not have adequate
access for commercial development. The Public Works Department
requests a Traffic Design Analysis be prepared If the frontage road can not
be feasibly extended to the new intersection with CSAH #S.
8. A 10 foot bituminous pedestrian path may be required along the entire
frontage of Salem Rd SW.
9. The new intersection on Woodland Dr SW at the top of the hill shall
meet the subdivision criteria for vertical & horizontal curves.
10. Section 64.127 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land
Development Manual (LDM) addresses limitations for trip generation on
specified types of roadways. Section 64.127, 9 cul-de-sac roads to 300
average daily trips (ADT). The single-family portion of this
development has only one access to Woodland Drive SW and can be
considered to be on one cul-de-sac, although there are two bulbs.
Depending on how the adjacent property to the west develops, this
roadway may exceed 300 ADT, as planned. Staff suggests that the
topographic limitations of this property and the abutting property to the
west make It extremely difficult to achieve access to another roadway.
Although 300 ADT may be exceeded, the volumes would still be below
500 ADT, which is the volume limitation for a development with only one
access (64.127, 10). Emergency services has not expressed concern
over the length of the cul-de-sac at this time. Due to the unique
topographic limitations and low traffic volumes, the City Engineer
suggests that the proposed roadways and projected trips can be
considered acceptable.
C:tTEMP�GDP 145Rev2-OO.doc
ROCHESTER 14�
Minnesota
213100
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4' Street SE Room 108
Rochester. MN 55904-3740
507.287-7800
FAX — 507-281.6216
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property (rates are
subject to annual review and change):
Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) @ $1605.50 per dev. acre.
Water Availability Charge (WAC) for the portion of this development indicated as
R-2 & B-5 @ $1605.50 per developable acre (main level].
Water Tower J8569, High Level Tower in Baihly Woodland Area, for the
remainder of the property @ $2144.63 [includes 10 years interest @ 7.5%].
Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division.
Storm Water Management Fee for regional participation of $1983.50 per acre, for
all areas of the residential development where on -site detention is not provided.
Rate for Commercial Development will be determined in part by the percent of
impervious coverage proposed for the development.
A proportional share of the cost for improvements to Woodland Dr SW and the
Frontage Road.
C AT E M PtG OP 1 45Rev2-00.doc
in
FROM: Planning Department, Transportation Division
JAZZUARY 2000 REFERRALS
Gut' 99-145 While access to the site is currently available at the intersection of Bamber
Salem Valley Road and CSAH 22 as well as Woodland Drive, Olmsted County
Heights has a project in its Capital Improvement Program that will result in
(REVISED) ( changes to the access. This project, scheduled for the Year 2001, will
(REVIreplace the bridge on Bamber Valley Road over the Zumbro Road, will
widen Bamber Valley Road to 4 lanes from Circle Drive through the
Mayowood Road intersection, and will include installation of a traffic signal
when warrants are met at the intersection of Bamber Valley Road and
Circle Drive.
In order to improve the sight distance, reduce the existing skew at the
intersection Bamber Valley Rd and Circle Drive, and to allow for the
existing bridge to remain inplace during construction, the preliminary
concept for the project is to shift Bamber Valley Road westward. This
would allow the new bridge to built alongside of existing bridge, allowing
traffic to remain on the existing for a longer period of time during the
construction. It would also bring Bamber Valley Rd into Circle Dr. at a goo
angle, which would improve the sight distance and albeit the safety at the
intersection.
Because of the topography that exists on the north side of Circle Drive and
the low level of traffic on the frontage road, the preliminary concept has
been that the connection of the north frontage road to CSAH 22 would be
severed, and access to CSAH 22 would need to occur at Woodland Drive
or at the signalized intersection at Fox Valley Drive. It is anticipated that
with the future inin stallation of a signal at Bamber Valley Rd adequate gaps
will be created the through traffic to allow the median opening on CSAH
22 at Woodland Drive to remain, thus providing access to both directions
of traffic on Circle Dr. If future traffic growth creates safety problems at the
Woodland Drive intersection, the likely scenario would be to close the
median and permit only right -in, right -out turns. A signal would not be
considered because of its proximity to other signalized intersections that
serve higher volume roadways. Under this scenario, more traffic would
need to be routed down the frontage road to the signalized intersection at
Fox Valley Drive in order to access CSAH 22, Our estimate of the resultant
traffic on the frontage road under this scenario is a total volume of
approximately 1100 vehicles per day, which would be within the range of
acceptable traffic Flow on a local residential street.
The consultant doing the project design for the Bamber Valley Road
project has been asked to look at the feasibility of maintaining the north
frontage road connection as the north leg of the new intersection between
Bamber Valley Rd and Circle Drive as one of the refinements they will be
studying as part of the overall Bamber Valley Rd project; a preliminary
scoping of this idea suggests that it will be difficult and very costly to do,
since a significant amount of retaining wall would be needed to stabilize
the large cut area that would result from extending and bulbing out the
road as it approaches the intersection, and the need to acquire potentially
a significant part of the Henderson property. If this idea is determined I
(43 11
based on further study to be feasible, the applicant should be required to
dedicate the needed right of way from the lands that he owns, which would
likely include significant portions fronting off the south end of the westerly
cul-de-sac in the GDP. The consultant working for the county is scheduled
to bring back the results of their analysis regarding the feasibility of
extending the frontage road the week of February 21 ".
As part of the site development staff would recommend that sidewalk be
provided along the north side of the frontage road to the east side of the
Henderson property. The purpose of this improvement will be to provide
the Baihley Woodland neighborhood access to the proposed West Circle
Drive trail that will be constructed along the north side of Circle Dr., as well
as to provide access the proposed signal at the intersection which will
provide a safe crossing of Circle Drive for persons wishing to access the
Zumbro River Trail system,
Iqq
Application Number: G-N tf y-i4< ( trS
No hydric soils exist on the site based on the Soil Survey
Hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property
owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and
submitting the information as part of this application.
A wetland delineation has been carried out for the property and is on file
with the Planning Department
A wetland delineation is on file with the Planning Department and a No -
loss, Exemption, or Replacement Plan has been submitted to the Planning
Department.
A wetland related application has been approved by the City. This plan
incorporates the approved wetland plan.
_ No hydric soils exist on the property based on the Soil Survey. However,
due to the location in the landscape the property owner should examine
the site for wetlands. The property owner is responsible for identifying
wetlands.
From John Harford
Wetlands LGU Representative
r4s
ROCHESTER PARK AND R_ ;REATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 4, 2000
TO: Suzanne LaPalm
Planning
FROM: Denny Stotz
SUBJECT: Salem Heights General Development Plan
Parkland dedication requirements for the development to be met via cash in lieu of
land dedication.
The steeply wooded terrain of the area to be subdivided does not meet land dedication
standards. Existing neighborhood parks in Baihly Heights and Baihly Meadows
Subdivisions will provide neighborhood park facilities for the development.
a: a ar: cote: ,_,. 21;7 z: .,E:ZHTZ .:.Zx
rpu
January 10. 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester. :MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: Zoning District Amendment ar99-20 by Ron Yanish to amend the zoning district on 1.2 acres of
land from the R-1 to B-5 district and on 5.3 acres of land from the R-1 to R-2 district. The property is located north of
Salem Rd. SW and west of Woodland Dr. SW.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced amendment is complete and our comments follow:
I . The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments. The Land Development
Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department determines the applicability of these fees.
2. The R-2 and B-5 portions of this property are within the Main Level Water System Service Area, which is
available at the southwest comer. Preliminary water system modeling indicates adequate pressures and flows for
fire protection for the R-2 area use and adequate pressures but marginal flows for fire protection are available for
the B-5 area (depending on the size and type of building built). The fire flows, however will increase in this area
within the next year or two with the planned improvements to other portions of the distribution system.
3. The R-1 area is within the Baihly High Level Water System Service Area, which is currently available at the
northwest comer and will also be available and will need to be connected into a planned water main near the
northeast corner of this site. Preliminary water system modeling indicates adequate pressures and flows for fire
protection are available for this use.
4. Coordinate connections on this project with the proposed City Public Works project to the east.
5. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout to serve this area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
C6441, R
iWL
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Jim Loehr, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
Yaggy Colby Associates
Ron Yanish
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280.1540 far imile 1o7_7Rn_1Sd7
January 10. 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester. :MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: Zoning District Amendment ar99-20 by Ron Yanish to amend the zoning district on 1.2 acres of
land from the R-1 to B-5 district and on 5.3 acres of land from the R-1 to R-2 district. The property is located north of
Salem Rd. SW and west of Woodland Dr. SW.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced amendment is complete and our comments follow:
I . The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments. The Land Development
Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department determines the applicability of these fees.
2. The R-2 and B-5 portions of this property are within the Main Level Water System Service Area, which is
available at the southwest comer. Preliminary water system modeling indicates adequate pressures and flows for
fire protection for the R-2 area use and adequate pressures but marginal flows for fire protection are available for
the B-5 area (depending on the size and type of building built). The fire flows, however will increase in this area
within the next year or two with the planned improvements to other portions of the distribution system.
3. The R-1 area is within the Baihly High Level Water System Service Area, which is currently available at the
northwest comer and will also be available and will need to be connected into a planned water main near the
northeast corner of this site. Preliminary water system modeling indicates adequate pressures and flows for fire
protection are available for this use.
4. Coordinate connections on this project with the proposed City Public Works project to the east.
5. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout to serve this area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
C6441, R
iWL
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Jim Loehr, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
Yaggy Colby Associates
Ron Yanish
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280.1540 far imile 1o7_7Rn_1Sd7
141 r u
rue pledje, we deliver
January 10, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: General Development Plan #99-145 by Ron Yanish to be known as Salem
Heights.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced general development plan is complete and our comments follow:
1. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments.
The Land Development Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department
determines the applicability of these fees.
2. Water main stub -outs or services should be installed to serve the unplatted property to the
west in the joint roadway area prior to street construction. These stub -out or service locations
may impact the size of the water main extending to the end of the cul-de-sac.
3. Coordinate connections on this project with the proposed City Public Works project to the
east.
4. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system
layout to serve this area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
C" RjWL
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
Yaggy Colby Associates
Ron Yanish
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsinule 507-280-1542
149
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS OR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
507/285-8231
January 6, 2000
Suzanne LaPalm
Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Dear Suzanne:
The Public Works Department has reviewed General Development Plan #99-145 by
Ron Yanish to be known as Salem Heights and has the following comments:
Olmsted County will be declaring the property along CSAH 22 as excess
and will advertise the sale of property within the next 60 days. The
frontage road is not planned to be constructed westerly. Does this change
their proposed local street system?
Sincerely,
Michael Sheehan
County Engineer
MTS:bw
t WVW'60 Ya18 r dx
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITYIAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Surveying and Mapping Engineering Highway Maintenance Parks & Agriculture Solid Waste
Administration Building Maintenance
TEL Properties
c/o Raymond N. Englander
774 Kristen Court
Eugene, OR 97401
January 19, 2000
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Rochcatcr, Mirmesota
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester.NV 55904
Attn: Mr. Jeffrey Mlerbusch, Senior Planer
Dear Mr. Etlerbuseh:
I have been asked to comment regarding the cut de sac proposed by Rocs Yannish that would be partly on our
property. I have reviewed the plans with Ron Yzamab, Don Borchcrdutg, Wade DuMond, and Bill Soinion.
We would have no problem with the genera) concept as drawn, that is, having part of the road and col de sac
shared between our property and Ron's as part of a general development plan. Prior to platting we may wish
to consider some minor alterations of course, and would work collaboratively with Ron Yannish on that
Ye k
RfymMaaag Properties
12!29/99
YCA o5762
SALEM HEIGHTS
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Salem Heights is approximately 27.5 acres bounded by Baihly Woodland 6" and 7" and
Bell Oaks Subdivisions to the north, unplatted land to the west, Salem Road (CSAH 25)
to the south, and Woodland Drive SW to the east.
The following is a written summary of the General Development Plan (GDP) in
accordance with Appendix B E-3,.
a) Topographic or soils conditions which, in the estimation of the applicant, may
create potential problems in street, drainage, public utilities or building design
and construction, and how these problems will be investigated further or
engineered to overcome the limitations.
The attached GDP shows the area under consideration. The Olmsted County Soil
Survey indicates shallow bedrock on this site on the steep slopes to the north and
south. As indicated by the street alignments, we are avoiding these steeper areas
of potential bedrock. Soil borings will be completed during the engineering
phases to determine subsurface conditions and the bedrock depth (if it is shallow)
in the areas of construction. No hydric soils are indicated on the Soil Survey, but
two small wetlands were found at approximately the location shown on the GDP.
The exact size of these wetlands is not known at this time, but they will be
surveyed in the near future.
b) Storm drainage problems which, in the estimation of the applicant, may result in
costs that will exceed normal storm drainage costs.
The storm drainage does not appear to cause problems that will result in the
increase of normal costs.
c) Identification of potential off -site drainage problems.
The applicant intends to participate in the storm water management plan the city
has developed. There should be no problems with off -site drainage created by this
development.
L!�3 D 0199A
! ROCHESTER OLMSM
Pi apmiur ncoio rw
(G;LW
Salem Heights
General Development Plan
Page 2
d) .availability of utilities to serve the area under consideration.
The northern portion of the site will be served by high level water and accessed
from the water main stubbed off of Bell Oaks Lane SW. The southern portion
will be served by the main level water service from the water main that crosses
Salem Road. Sanitary sewer for the entire site is located near the water main and
also crosses Salem Road. The city is in the planning process for extending sewer
and water across the south portion of the Salem Heights property to service
existing developments east of Woodland Drive SW.
e) Identification of possible erosion problems which may arise in the estimation of
the applicant.
The areas of steeper slopes, one in the extreme north and one in the south, will be
avoided where possible. The majority of these areas are shown on the GDP in the
rear of lots and will not be graded. Where development encroaches into the
steeper slopes, erosion control measures will be incorporated into the grading plan
during final design.
f} A general statement as to the possible phasing of any development activity to
occur on the property under the control of the applicant.
The proposed R-2 and B-5 locations are planned to be a part of the first phase,
including the lots located on the east side of the R-1 area off of Woodland Drive
SW. The remaining R-1 lots to the west are planned as the second phase.
Page 2
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9, 2000
Ms. Schultze made a mo n to approve Anne on Petition #00-02 by the Verna Badger
Trust, with the property be g designated " (Holding Zone). The motion was seconded i
by Mr. Quinn, and carried 7-
Ms. Schultze moved to irprove AnnexatXnPetition #00-03 by Fern Meyers, with the
property being design d "H" (Holding Z e). Ms. McGowan seconded the motion,
which carried 7-0. I
CONTINUED ITEMS:
District.
family homes in the R-1 (Mixed Single Family) District and uses within the R-2 (Low
Density Residential) District and B-5 (Residential Commercial) District. The Plan
proposes public roadways and includes re-aiignment of the frontage road The property
is located south of Baihiv Woodland 7 Subdivision and Baihly Hills Drive SW west of
Woodland Drive SW and north of Salem Road SW.
Ms. Baker presented the Zone Change staff report, dated February 4, 2000, to the
Commission. The staff report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department.
Ms. Baker presented a map and pointed out the areas proposed to be changed to R-2 and B-5,
noting the remainder of the property would continue to be zoned R-1. She explained that the
access issues are currently being studied and stated it is not certain at this point whether there
will be access to Salem Road. She pointed out the possible access to Salem Road on the map
and noted that if that access is included, the GDP would need to be revised to show it.
Ms. Schultze asked if there was any interest on the part of the applicant to table this until the
access issues are resolved.
i
Page
!! City Planntne and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearne Date: february 9, ?000
Ms. Baker stated the applicant has not expressed interest in tabling. She referred to the criteria
listed on pages B-3 and B-4 of the packet. She explained that staff feels the R-2 area is
appropriate, but the access issues figure into the appropriateness of the B-5 zoned area. She
explained that during the neighborhood meeting, the applicant expressed an interest in putting
an office building in the area zoned B-5, and the site location criteria would require the frontage
road either be a through road or that its intersection is with a Collector or higher order street.
She commented that there is a potential that if the access is closed, the one at Woodland Drive
may also be closed, so the intersection with the frontage road would be with Fox Valley Drive,
which is a Collector, so then it could meet the criteria. Ms. Baker pointed out that this location
may be better -suited for a restricted development, but zoning it B-5 may open the door for other
uses that might not be appropriate at that location. She stated that for those reasons, and
those identified in the staff report, staff recommends denial of the zone change to B-5.
Mr. Brede noted that in one place it is worded that staff is recommending "denial," and in
another it says "should not be approved." He asked if those mean the same thing.
Ms. Baker answered yes.
Representing the applicant, Wade Dumond, Yaggy Colby Associates, addressed the
Commission. He stated that they feel the B-5 would be an appropriate zoning based on
conversations with the Transportation Planner, and both the City and County Public Works
Departments, and the fact that this is a frontage road. Mr. Dumond read the site location
criteria from the Land Development Manual for an office in the B-5 zoning district. He agreed
that the frontage road connection is up in the air at this time. He explained that in discussions
with the neighbors, and in reviewing the development, that particular section of Woodland Drive
is not a good intersection and both the applicants and neighbors feel it should be closed, so that
will occur in the near future after the study is complete. Mr. Dumond commented that based on
what the Ordinance says, this property is appropriate for B-5 zoning, keeping in mind that the
connection to Fox Valley Drive will occur. He noted that if the Commission denies B-5 zoning
for this portion of the property, they agree with staff that it should be zoned R-2.
Ms. McGowan asked if they are interested in a restricted development.
Mr. Dumond stated they could do that at a later date, and noted it is a lengthier process. He
pointed out that if it is zoned B-5, it is required that the Commission review any proposals for
development on that property.
Mr. Werven asked how the hillside will be secured from breakdown.
Mr. Dumond pointed out the area Mr. Werven was speaking about and it was determined that
area is further west than the property in question. Mr. Dumond stressed that the neighbors are
agreeable to the B-5 zoning in that area, with the hope that there will be a connection at some
point on the frontage road.
Merlin Ricklefs, 1535 Woodland Drive SW, addressed the Commission. He stated that
construction of Salem Road from Samber Valley School to the TJ Maxx shopping center is
totally inadequate for the traffic it carries. He feels that as projects go forward, the road will
become an even worse traffic hazard. Mr. Ricklefs stated that since this roadway is a segment
of Circle Drive, major reconstruction should be done.
Page J
City Planning and Zoning Commzssion Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
1550
Mr. Reiter stated he agrees that there are concerns about traffic. He pointed out that there is
the study related to reconstruction of CSAH 8 in process that will look at whether a north
approach to CSAH is feasible, and also a traffic management study that is looking at the entire
Circle Drive system and how to maintain the traffic flow. He explained that the Circle Drive
study will be a 5 to 6 month study, at the end of which, there will be recommendations on what
intersections to signalize, which accesses may need to be closed, and whether existing
medians should be closed or restricted. Mr. Reiter stated that as part of the study, there will be
some closures, and then they will look at the different options of rerouting traffic, as well, in
order to provide access to signalized intersections along Circle Drive.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing.
Ms. Schultze made a motion to approve Zoning District Amendment #99.20 by Ron
Yanish, based on staff -suggested findings and with the portion requested for R-2 be
designated as such, and the portion requested for B-5 be designated R-2, which allows
for flexibility on possible future discussions regarding restricted development. Mr.
Staver seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0.
Ms. Baker presented the General Development Plan staff report, dated February 4, 2000, to the
Commission. The staff report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department,
Ms. Baker displayed a drawing of the GDP, and noted that based on the zone change
recommendations the Commission made, the GDP will need to be revised accordingly. She
referred to the staff -suggested findings contained in the packet and stated that staff is
recommending approval subject to 8 conditions. She noted that the cul-de-sac on the far west
side is shown on the adjacent property and that property owner has submitted a letter stating
that they are in agreement with that. She stated that at the time of platting, the applicants will
need to have the signature of the property owner so the entire right-of-way can be platted or the
right-of-way will have to be shifted to be entirely on the Yanish property.
Ms. Schultze asked staff if they had comments regarding the outlots.
Ms. Baker explained it is the applicant's intent is to make the outlots available for sale to owners
of the lots north of this subdivision. She believes that at the time of platting, they will need to
know if there are buyers for those pieces, because if there are not, they will have to plat them
as part of the back yards of this subdivision. She commented that staff is comfortable having
that addressed in the preliminary plat stage.
Representing the applicant, Wade Dumond, Yaggy Colby Associates, addressed the
Commission. He stated they are in agreement with all of the conditions and pointed out that
every one of the property owners to the north have expressed interest in gaining those outlots.
If that does not go through, it will be worked in to the remaining lots. Mr. Dumond stated that he
is not sure what is required in condition number 5.
Mr. Reiter explained there is a project to construct a trail along West Circle Drive from 2n0 Street
SW to Bamber Valley Road, and where that trail ends, there may be a stretch across the two
lots on the west side where an easement will have to be provided, so that when the Bamber
tTii�age 5
(( ���---//////������'''"'City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
Valley Road project is done, the trail can be extended to connect, if necessary, with pedestrian
facilities provided as part of this development. He feels there only needs to be one pedestrian
facility.
Mr. Quinn asked about the area to the east.
Mr. Reiter stated there is no expectation that this developer will be responsible for anything east
of Woodland Drive.
Mr. Dumond stated that it is understood that they are required to provide a trail along the entire
southern boundary along Salem Road.
Ms. Schultze asked what the trail 'project Mr. Reiter spoke of is called.
Mr. Reiter stated it is the West Circle Drive Trail.
Discussion ensued on the rewording of condition number 5.
Ms. Baker suggested rewording condition number 5 to say, "A revised GDP shall be filed with
the Planning Department that identifies a future trail along the north side of the frontage road,
and boundaries of the approved zoning district amendments."
Mr. Reiter stated that depending on the timing of development of this property and the timing of
decisions regarding access to Salem Road, the bulbing shown in the frontage road, as it
approaches Woodland Drive, may be best left in its current alignment. He pointed out that it will
depend on when the decisions are made and what the decisions are.
Ms. Schultze asked if condition number 2 covers that issue.
Ms. Baker explained the reason for the condition is in case there needs to be additional right-of-
way dedicated in another area. This was raised in a conversation with the developer on
Monday regarding if Woodland Drive is closed to Salem Road, there probably isn't a reason to
bulb it to the north and it could stay in a straight alignment and there needs to be an
understanding that it may not happen as shown on the GDP. Ms. Baker explained that if we
know Woodland Drive would stay open, it would make more sense to bulb out for additional
stacking. She commented that perhaps in the motion, the Commission could acknowledge that
the design of the roadway could be the current alignment or could be buibed.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing.
Ms. Schultze made a motion to approve General Development Plan #99-145, to be known
as Salem Heights, with staff -suggested findings and conditions, noting the following
addition to condition number 2, "The east side of the frontage road at Woodland Drive
may either be in alignment as shown on the GDP or may continue in its present
alignment, as appropriate, based on access to Salem Road;" and condition number 5
revised as stated by Ms. Baker. Mr. Stever seconded the motion, which carried 7-0.
Page 6
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Heanng Date: February 9, 2000
r�
Conditions:
I. Storm water management must be addressed for this development. As indicated in
the narrative submitted with the GDP, the applicant intends to participate in the City's
Regional Storm Water Management Plan. if the City accepts participation, storm
water management fees will apply. Storm sewer routing and drainage information
must be provided to the City. The development must minimize impact on the
adjacent property.
Z At the time of platting, additional right-of-way may need to be dedicated to
accommodate the future design of the frontage road and its potential access to
Salem Road. In addition, controlled access must be provided along the entire length
of Salem Road SW. The east side of the frontage road at Woodland Drive may either
be in alignment as shown on the GDP or may continue in its present alignment, as
appropriate, based on access to Salem Road.
3. The most westerly cu-de-sac is shown to straddle two properties and the bulb is
partly within property currently owned by the County. When this property is platted,
partial dedication of the right-of-way will not be acceptable. The plat will either need
to be signed by multiple property owners or the roadway will need to be shifted
entirely on the Yanish property with access and utilities provided to the abutting
property to the west.
4. The applicant shall address the intended use and ownership of the "outlots" labeled
along the north property line.
5. A revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department that identifies a future trail
along the north side of the frontage road, and boundaries of the approved zoning
district amendments. Upon a decision by the County regarding access from the
westerly end of the frontage road to Salem Road, the applicant shall file a revised
GDP with the Planning Department reflecting the future configuration of the frontage
road and any additional right-of-way that may be needed.
6. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Rochester
that outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm
water management; park dedication, which shall be cash in lieu of land; traffic
improvements; pedestrian facilities; contributions for public infrastructure, including
improvements to Woodland Drive SW.
7. Additional Information will be required at the time of platting, demonstrating that the
new intersection on Woodland Drive SW, at the northeast corner of this property, will
meet the subdivision criteria for vertical and horizontal curves.
8. A detailed Wetland Delineation report and a replacement plan are required if the
applicant intends to fill or drain wetlands.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ORIGINATING DEPT:
PLANNING
MEETING a
DATE: ) 1/
ITEM NO.
�-3
ITEM DESCRIPTION., Amendment #99-20 by Ron Yanish to amend the zoning district for PREPARED BY:
6.41 acres of land located north of Salem Road SW and west of Woodland Drive SW. The Mitzi A. Baker.
applicant is proposing to change 1 acres of land from the R-1 (Mixed Single Family) District Senior Planner
to the B-5 (Residential Commercial) District and also to change 5.41 acres oiland from the
R-1 (Mixed Single Family) District to the R-2 (Low Density Residential) District.
March 1. 2000
City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on February 9, 2000 to consider this zone change.
The Commission reviewed the zone change request based on the criteria as included in the staff report and recommended
approval of the R-2 as requested and also recommends that the area requested for B-5 be changed to R-2, with staff
suggested findings.
Ms. Schultze made a motion to approve Zoning District Amendment #99-20 by Ron Yanish, based on staff -
suggested findings and with the portion requested for R-2 be designated as such, and the portion requested for B-5
be designated R-2, which allows for flexibility on possible future discussions regarding restricted development. Mr.
Staver seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0.
—anning Staff Recommendation:
See attached staff report dated February 2, 2000.
Council Action Needed:
If the Council wishes to proceed it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance that can be
adopted supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law to amend the Zoning District(s).
VA
Distribution:
1. City Clerk
2. City Administrator
3. City Attorney: Legal Description attached
4. Planning Department File
5. Yaggy Colby Associates
6. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime
Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street
ACTION:
...otion By:
Cpz Cc min..Tcs from PYi'VIOKS
GDP P46C �Par,,,r
after 7:00 p.m. on Monday Marc 2000, in the Council/Board
SE. JZLAI
( ���
Seconded By: G Avv I
n
Action:
o ME
li
of"!
3JNVH:)3NOZ
y1053NNIW AHJOV
S1HJ13H W31VS
i
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner
DATE: February 2, 2000
I T£D.{l Glrol•v s
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN
55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507/285.8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADDRESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGlHRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
5071285-8213
WELLSEPTIC
507/285.8345
FAX
507/287-2275
RE: Zoning District Amendment #99-20 by Ron Yanish to re -zone 5.41 acres
of land from R-1 (Mixed Single Family) to R-2 (Low Density Residential)
and 1 acre from R-1 to B-5 (Residential Commercial). The property is
located west of Woodland Lane SW and north of Salem Road SW.
• Planning Department Review:
Petitioner: Ron Yanish
1807 7`" St. NW
Rochester, MN 55901
Consultant: Yaggy Colby Associates
717 Third Ave. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Location of Property: The property is located north of Salem Rd. SW and
west of Woodland Lane SW.
Requested Action: The applicant requests 5.41 acres be rezoned from
R-1 (Mixed Single Family) to the R-2 (Low Density
Residential) district and 1 acre be rezoned from R-1
to B-5 (Residential Commercial).
Existing Land Use: The property is undeveloped and has been cropped
in the past.
Proposed Land Use: A general development plan is being considered for
this property concurrent with this zone change
request.
Adjacent Land Use and North: The property to the north is zoned R-1 and is
Zoning: developed with the Baihly Woodland subdivisions.
. South: Salem Road abuts the property to the south.
One single family residence also abuts the property's
south property line.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
(at/►�r Page 2
11WY ZC 99-18
February 3, 2000
East: Property to the east is zoned R-Sa (Mixed
Single Family Overlay) and is developed with single
family homes.
West: The property to the west is vacant and is
zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family).
Transportation Access:
Access to the site will be provided from Woodland
Drive SW and the frontage road. Although the
frontage road currently has access to Salem Rd. at its
west end, that access may close in the future. The
intersection of the existing frontage road is proposed
to be moved further north. This would require
vacating a portion of the existing roadway. The
County will be reconstructing Bamber Valley Road
and is reviewing the feasibility of different designs.
The County is exploring the option of keeping the
west frontage road access open but will not have
additional information from the Consultant util later in
February. The uncertainty of the access to Salem
Road, from the frontage road, makes it very difficult to
support a B-5 Residential -Commercial district on the
property at this time.
Wetlands:
There do not appear to be wetlands within the
proposed R-2 or B-5 areas of the property. Wetlands
may exist on the property, however.
Referral Comments:
1. Planning Department — Transportation
2. RPU Water
3. Rochester Public Works
Report Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Referral Comments
Analysis for Zoning District Amendment:
Under the provisions of Paragraph 60.338 of the Rochester Land Development Manual, the
Commission shall recommend for approval and the Council shall approve, an application
requesting an amendment to the zoning map if the amendment satisfies the following criteria:
1) The criteria of this subdivision apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by
formal petition. An amendment need only satisfy one of the following criteria:
a) The area, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan;
b) The area was originally zoned erroneously due to a technical or administrative
error;
c) While both the present and proposed zoning districts are consistent with the
Plan, the proposed district better furthers the policies and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan as found in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Rochester Urban Service
Page 3 ! �3
ZC 99-18 l
February 3..2000
Area Land Use Plan, Chapter 3 of the Housing Plan, and Chapter 10 of the ROCOG
Long Range Transportation Plan; or
d) The area has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public
interest to rezone so as to encourage development or redevelopment of the area.
This property was part of an area 100% surrounded by the City limits, which the City annexed
in 1997. At the time of annexation, the property was placed within the H — Holding Zone to
allow for further consideration of zoning for the area. The areas developed with large single
family lots were zoned R-Sa (Mixed Single Family Overlay), the undeveloped parcels were
zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family). This parcel was, and still is, undeveloped and was zoned
R-1 (Mixed Single Family). At the time there were no development proposals for this site.
Proposed R-2: The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan designates this property as
appropriate for `low density residential" types of uses. Rezoning 5.41 acres of land to R-2
(Low Density Residential) would be consistent with the "low density residential"land use
designation. in addition, it would help further the policies and goals found in Chapters 2 and 3
of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, which encourage developing a range of
densities and development styles. including both R-1 and R-2 zoning within the development
will encourage mixed housing styles and densities. This will also help to further goals and
policies found within Chapter 3 of the Housing Plan.
Proposed B-5: Re -zoning 1 acre of this property to the B-5 (Residential Commercial) district
can be considered under the current land use designation 'low density residential'. The 8-5
zoning district is intended to provide for limited low intensity business uses that are located
within residential areas, but in a manner which buffers the adjacent residential area from the
effects of the commercial activities. Uses within the B-5 zoning district are limited. Most uses
require at least a Type 11 Conditional Use Permit and all uses, except day care facilities and
funeral homes, have to meet certain site location criteria. The enclosed neighborhood
meeting summary indicates that the 8-5 parcel would be used for an office building. In order
for an office use to meet the site location criteria (criteria "E' on this property, the frontage
road would need to be a through road, meaning the westerly access to Bamber Valley Rd.
would need to be maintained. The feasibility of maintaining an access at that location appears
questionable at this time. The Consultant working on the design for Bamber Valley Rd. is
expected to provide additional information to the County later this month. in fact, if there is no
direct access from the frontage road to Salem Rd., or if the only access to the frontage road is
via Woodland Lane SW, the only use within the 8-5 Zoning District which could be considered
would be a day care facility.
2) The criteria of this subdivision also apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed
by formal petition. However, an amendment must satisfy all of the following criteria:
a) the permitted uses allowed within the proposed zoning district will be appropriate
on the subject property and compatible with adjacent properties and the
neighborhood; and
Proposed R-2: Uses within the R-2 Zoning District would be appropriate on the property
and compatible with adjacent properties.
Proposed B-5: Uses within the B-5 Zoning District may not be appropriate on this
property for reasons mentioned above. The County had initially planned to close ad
direct access from the frontage road to Salem Rd. with the reconstruction of Bamber
Valley Rd. and its intersection with Salem Rd. The County is now studying the feasibility
of maintaining an access from the frontage road to Salem Rd. at the west end of this
property. Unless the County determines that this is feasible, the only uses within the B-
Page 4 /
1 ZC 99-18
February 3, 2000
5 Zoning District which could be considered on this site, according to the required site
location criteria, are day care facilities and funeral homes. The enclosed neighborhood
meeting summary states that an once building would be proposed for B-5 property.
Until a decision is made regarding the future design of the frontage road and Bamber
Valley Rd., it would not be appropriate to rezone any portion of this property B-5
Residential Commercial.
b) the proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning. (Spot Zoning involves the
reclassification of a single lot or several small lots to a district which is different
than that assigned to surrounding properties, for reasons inconsistent with the
purposes set forth in this ordinance, the state enabling legislation, or the decisions
of courts in this state).
Proposed R-2: Uses within the R-2 district would be appropriate on the subject property
and would be compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood. The
amendment to R-2 would be consistent with the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use
Plan and would not be considered spot zoning.
Proposed B-5: Rezoning 1 acre to the B-5 zoning district may be consistent within the
"low density residential" Land Use designation but would not be consistent with the site
location criteria for most uses within the B-5 zoning district. Aside from funeral homes
and day care centers, no other use would meet the site location criteria at this location.
Staff Recommendation:
Based on the above -mentioned findings, it would appear that the zoning district amendment to R-
2 would meet the above criteria. An amendment to B-5 would appear to be inappropriate at this
time. Until the future design and access issues are resolved, rezoning a portion of this property to
the B-5 district should not be approved, for reasons mentioned in the findings.
Staff recommends that the request to re -zone 1 acre from R-f (Mixed Single Family) to B-5
(Residential -Commercial) be denied, based on the above suggested findings.
Staff recommends that the request to amend 5.41 acres from the R-1 (Mixed Single Family)
district to the R-2 (Low Density Residential) district be approved, based on the above suggested
findings.
Furthermore, staff recommends that the f -acre area petitioned for re -zoning to the B-5 district be
re -zoned to the R-2 district. This would provide for a contiguous area of R-2 zoned property within
the southeastern portion of the property. Staff recommends that the findings recommended
above for re -zoning to the R-2 (Low Density Residential) district apply equally to this one acre
area and provide support for re -zoning it to the R-2 district.
FROM: Planning Department, Transportation Division
JANUARY 2000
City
I GDP 99-145 While access to the site is currently available at the intersection of Bomber
Salem Valley Road and CSAH 22 as well as Woodland Drive, Olmsted County
Heights has a project in its Capital Improvement Program that will result in
Yanish changes to the access. This project, scheduled for the Year 2001, will
(REVISED)
replace the bridge on Bamber Valley Road over the Zumbro Road, will
widen Bamber Valley Road to 4 lanes from Circle Drive through the
Mayowood Road intersection, and will include installation of a traffic signal i
when warrants are met at the intersection of Bamber Valley Road and
Circle Drive.
In order to improve the sight distance, reduce the existing skew at the
intersection Bamber Valley Rd and Circle Drive, and to allow for the
existing bridge to remain inplace during construction, the preliminary
concept for the project is to shift Bamber Valley Road westward. This
i would allow the new bridge to built alongside of existing bridge, allowing
traffic to remain on the existing for a longer period of time during the
construction. It would also bring Bamber Valley Rd into Circle Dr. at a 900
angle, which would improve the sight distance and albeit the safety at the
intersection.
Because of the topography that exists on the north side of Circle Drive and
the low level of traffic on the frontage road, the preliminary concept has
been that the connection of the north frontage road to CSAH 22 would be
severed, and access to CSAH 22 would need to occur at Woodland Drive
j or at the signalized intersection at Fox Valley Drive. It is anticipated that
I with the future installation of a signal at Bamber Valley Rd adequate gaps
I will be created in the through traffic to allow the median opening on CSAH
22 at Woodland Drive to remain, thus providing access to both directions
of traffic on Circle Dr. If future traffic growth creates safety problems at the
Woodland Drive intersection, the likely scenario would be to close the
median and permit only right -in, right -out turns. A signal would not be
considered because of its proximity to other signalized intersections that
serve higher volume roadways. Under this scenario, more traffic would
need to be routed down the frontage road to the signalized intersection at
Fox Valley Drive in order to access CSAH 22. Our estimate of the resultant
traffic on the frontage road under this scenario is a total volume of
approximately 1100 vehicles per day, which would be within the range of
acceptable traffic Flow on a local residential street.
IThe consultant doing the project design for the Bamber Valley Road
project has been asked to look at the feasibility of maintaining the north
frontage road connection as the north leg of the new intersection between
Bamber Valley Rd and Circle Drive as one of the refinements they will be
studying as part of the overall Bamber Valley Rd project; a preliminary
scoping of this idea suggests that it will be difficult and very costly to do,
since a significant amount of retaining wall would be needed to stabilize
the large cut area that would result from extending and bulbing out the
road as it approaches the intersection, and the need to acquire potentially
a significant part of the Henderson orooerty. If this idea is determined
1(00
based on further study to be feasible, the applicant should be required to
dedicate the needed right of way from the lands that he owns, which would
likely include significant portions fronting off the south end of the westerly
cul-de-sac in the GDP. The consultant working for the county is scheduled
to bring back the results of their analysis regarding the feasibility of
extending the frontage road the week of February 215',
As part of the site development staff would recommend that sidewalk be
provided along the north side of the frontage road to the east side of the
Henderson property. The purpose of this improvement will be to provide
the Baihley Woodland neighborhood access to the proposed West Circle
Drive trail that will be constructed along the north side of Circle Dr., as well
as to provide access the proposed signal at the intersection which will
provide a safe crossing of Circle Drive for persons wishing to access the
Zumbro River Trail system.
i
ROCHESTER
Minnesota
U12/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
141
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4'" Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287.7800
FAX — 507-251-6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for
Zoning District Amendment #9920 on the Ron Yanish (Salem Heights) property.
The following are Public Works comments on the proposal:
Access to Salem Road SW may be limited or eliminated by the
ROCOG study of CSAH 22 Access Control, thereby affecting the
appropriateness of the proposed B-5 Zoning at Woodland Drive SW
and Salem Road.
C:\TEMP%ZO NE9920.doc
January 19, 2000
Ms. Mitzi Baker
Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
RE: Summary —Neighborhood Meeting
Salem Heights General Development Plan & Zone Change
Dear Mitzi:
E SINEEE,
-�:I7ECT,
YAGGY
COLBY
.AXOECAPE APCNITECTE
A neighborhood meeting was held January 12, 2000 at Yaggy Colby Associates' office
regarding the Salem Heights General Development Plan and the proposed B-5 and R-2
zone change areas. Approximately 25 to 30 individuals were in attendance including Mr.
Ron Yanish and myself (please see attached sign -in sheet; not everyone signed in). The
layout and zone change areas were discussed, as well as individual neighbor concerns, but
the major issue the neighbors had, surrounded traffic.
The traffic on Woodland Drive SW will increase and only worsen the existing
intersection onto Salem Road SW (County Road 25). There are currently five access
points at this intersection; Woodland Drive SW to the north, the Frontage Road to the
east and west, and Salem Road SW to the east and west. Many traffic options were
discussed, but one solution was agreed upon as the best by everyone at the meeting:
closing the access onto Salem Road SW at the intersection of Woodland Drive SW, and
leave just the east/west Frontage Road access points onto Woodland Drive SW. Access
points to Salem Road SW could then occur at the existing signalized Fox Valley Drive
SW/Salem Road SW intersection to the east, and at the intersection of Salem Road SW
and Bamber Valley Road SW to the west.
This intersection of Salem Road SW and Bamber Valley Road SW was discussed at a
predevelopment meeting on December 1, 1999 at the Planning Department. Olmsted
County is planning on relocating this intersection 200 to 300 feet farther to the west, as a
new bridge crossing the Zumbro River will be constructed in the next couple of years.
This poses a problem for this desired access point onto Salem Road SW from the
Frontage Road. There is a steep cut slope at this location, which would make an
intersection at this point more costly. There would also be the need for extending the
Frontage Road an additional 200 to 300 feet to connect with this intersection and an
additional signal. At the predevelopment meeting, Olmsted County staff indicated they
did not want this to be an intersection point with the Frontage Road, but as further
discussion has taken place with City Public Works staff and County Public Works staff,
this may be the best location the Frontage Road intersects with Salem Road SW. The
neighbors at the meeting did feel this solution addressed their traffic concerns for
Woodland Drive SW if Woodland Drive SW was widened and upgraded in the future as
well.
P%A"VIAE
ROCHESTER OFFIC
717 Third Avenue'
Rochester, MN 5590<
507-288.6464
fax 507-288-505
MASON CITY OFFIC
515-424-634
Fax 51 S-42
101'
January 19, 2000
Ms. Mitzi Baker
Page 2
The meeting also included discussions regarding the R-2 area as upscale townhomes and the B-5
area as an office building being occupied by Mr. Yanish. Mr. Yanish agreed to revise the
proposed location of the B-5 to be farther to the west next to the old school house property, and
there appeared to be no concerns with having an office building at this new location along the
Frontage Road. The office building is planned to be designed in such a way as to fit in with the
neighborhood residential architecture.
Sincerely,
YAGGY COLBY ASSOCIATES
Wade DuMond
Project Designer
WCD
YCA #5762
Attachment
cc Ron Yanish
Mike Sheehan
Charles Rieter
Richard Freese
10
■
Y ,(.(.Y
0 KY
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINA
PCBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNLNG
.M DESCRIPTION: General Development Plan #146 Kingsbury Hills
February 22, 2000
MEETING n/
DATE: .i-6-00� ( t
ITEM NO. ++
PREPARED BY:
Mitzi A. Baker,
NOTE: The Council will need to take action on the request For approval of Substantial Land Alteration activities, included with
this GDP.
City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this item on February 9, 2000 and recommends approval subject eight
conditions and modifications. Schultze moved to approve GDP 146 with staff suggested findings, Slaver seconded the motion, which
carried 7-0. Ms. Schultze moved to approve the Substantial Land Alteration. Mr. Slaver seconded the motion. The motion carried 7.0.
f. Storm water management must be provided for this development. On -site detention is not being proposed with
the GDP. Based on current policy, the owner may request to participate in the City's Regional Stormwater Plan
and pay and applicable stormwater management fee. Allowance of participation is at the City's discretion.
Based on the topography of this site, on -site detention may be required for a portion of the northwest corner of
the property. Any on -site stormwater facilities serving 50 developable acres or less will remain private, and
execution of a long term maintenance and ownership agreement will be required. Ali required private
stormwater facilities must be constructed concurrent i t initial stages of development.
2. When platted, 60' of right-of-way will be requiredvor 5e St. NW and controlled access must be provided along
the entire length of 55` St. NW, with the exception of the street access approved through the GDP. Additional
controlled access for private driveways will be required within 50 feet from the intersections of any new road(s)
with the 5r St. NW right-of-way.
3. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required from 55fb St. NW.
4. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 550' St. NW. Current City policy for substandard streets
would require a contribution of $30 per foot of frontage. If a Traffic Improvement District (TID) is adopted for 55`'
St. NW, development of this property may be subject tdd]tional charges.
5. At the time of platting, easements will be requiredfor off�sitje"utilities.
6. Parkland dedication for this development shall be satisfied by cash in lieu of land.
7. Areas of hydric soils are shown on the GDP which must be reviewed further to determine whether Wetlands
exist. Staff will need to conduct an on -site review in the spring to determine boundaries or lack of Wetlands. No
grading or filling of these areas shall occur prior to obtaining "no -loss" or replacement approval from the LGU.
S. Due to the block lengths in this development, mid -block pedestrian connections shall be provided, except where
the City Engineer determines topographic conditions ma a the pedestrian trails unfeasible.
Plannina Staff Recommendation:
See attached staff report dated February 4, 2000
UNCIL ACTION: Motion by Second by: to:
Mage
RCA Z)1 w
March `
Council Action Needed:
I
1. If the Council wishes to proceed with the General Development Plan and request for Substantial
Land Alteration as proposed, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution, with
findings, for Council approval.
Attachments:
1. Staff Report dated February 4, 2000
2. Minutes of February 9, 2000 CPZC Meeting
Distribution:
1. City Clerk
2. City Administrator
3. City Attorney
4. Planning Department File
5. Planning Department, GIS Division
6. McGhie & Betts, Inc.
7. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday March 6, 2000 in the Council / Board Chambers in tt
Government Center at 151 4th Street SE.
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN -00
3-�
FOR
KINGSBURY PROPERTY
IN
SECTION 18 OF CASCADE TOWNSHIP
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
McGhie Betts, inc.
Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors
Planners
1648 Third Avenue S.E., Rochester, MN 55904 507-289-3919
1188 Highway Three South, Northfield, MN 55057 507-645-0964
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR
KINGSBURY PROPERTY
IN
SECTION 18 OF CASCADE TOWNSHIP
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR
KINGSBURY PROPERTY
IN
SECTION 18 OF CASCADE TOWNSHIP
ROCHESTER,MN
Prepared for:
Bigelow Enterprises
Po Box 247
Byron, Mn 55920
Prepared By:
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
1648 Third Avenue Se
Rochester, Mn 55904
507-289-3919
January 2000
INDEX
Title
Index
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Background
3.0 Site Analysis
3.1 Location
3.2 Site Characteristics
3.3 Land Use and Zoning
3.4 Utilities
3.5 Access
4.0 Proposed General Development Plan
4.1 Project Description and Scope
4.2 Access/Traffic Circulation
4.3 Storm Water Management
4.4 Utilities
4.5 Floodplain
4.6 Phasing
5.0 Environmental Review Process
6.0 Criteria for Approval of General Development Plan
Exhibits
Exhibit A — 1995 Olmsted County Land Use Plan
Exhibit B — Topography
Exhibit C — Soils Map
Exhibit D — GDP of Kingsbury Farms
General Development Report
Kingsbury Property Paoe 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Appendix
B-1, Item E, of the Informational Supplement to the Zoning Ordinance and Land
Development Manual, as adopted by the City of Rochester January 8, 1992, and
as amended by Ordinance in May of 1999 and dated December 27, 1999.
A General Development Plan (GDP) is required for this site in accordance with
Section 61.211 for any site where the eventual platting of the property involves
approval of a Type III Land Subdivision permit.
This report is intended to provide a descriptive narrative of the attached GDP
prepared by McGhie & Betts, Inc., of Rochester, Minnesota.
The 1978 Land Use Plan for the City of Rochester indicates that this site lies
outside the Urban Service Area. However, the updated 1995 Olmsted County
Land Use Plan (Exhibit A) designates this site within the 25 year Urban Service
Area.
2.0 BACKGROUND
This site has historically been in row crop production. There is no farmstead
located on the site.
The applicant filed a petition for annexation of the site, consisting of 40.31 acres.
The 40.31 acres includes the right-of-way along the Kresbach property, which is
the connecting link to current city limits. The petition was filed in December of
1999 and to date the Cascade Town Board has voted to not object to the
annexation. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council have not
acted upon the annexation at this time.
General Development Report
Kinpsoury Propertv Pane 2
3.0 SITE ANALYSIS
3.1 Location
The property is located in the NE '/4 of the NW '/< of Section 18 of Cascade
Township and is adjacent to the west property boundary of Fred
Kresbach. 551" Street NW is the northerly boundary of the site. The land to
the south and the west is unplatted and is owned by the Kingsbury. The
site contains 39.81 acres.
3.2 Site Characteristics
3.2.1 Topography
Elevations on the site range from a high point of 1178 feet above
mean sea level located on a knoll in the center of the property to an
elevation of 1110 feet in the northeast corner of the property. The
land slopes at approximately 6% to the northwest corner, the
southeast boundary, and the northeast corners of the property.
As noted, the northern boundary is adjacent 551" St. NW, which is
currently constructed as a rural road. Surface drainage on the site
flows to the existing ditch to the north, and to adjacent properties in
the south and westerly directions. (Refer to Exhibit B Topography).
The site is currently agricultural land and has been cropped up to
the 1999 growing season
3.2.2 Wetlands
There are no existing wetlands on the site. McGhie & Betts,
Environmental Services has investigated the site for the presence
General Development Re,
Kingsbury PrODerty Page 3
of hydric soils (Refer to exhibit C Soils Map) and reviewed aerial
photos and tile records for the area. It was found that the mapped
hydric soils have been effectively drained by drain tile and no other
wetland indicators were found to be present at the time of
investigation.
3.2.3 Soils
Nine soil mapping units occur on this SITE and represent soils
formed both in loess and glacial till. Variable thicknesses of loess
range from 4 to 25 feet mantling the glacial till. Exposures of the till
occur mainly on side slopes and lower lying landscape settings.
The units formed in loess consists of Garwin silty clay loam (176)
Port Byron silt loam 6 to 12 % slopes, (285C), slope phases of
Timula silt loam, 6 through 18 % slopes, (322C and 322D) and
slope phases of Mt. Carroll silt loam, 2 through 12 % slopes (401 B
and 401C2). The units formed in glacial till include Racine loam, 6
to 12 % slopes, (99C) and Readlyn loam (295).
These soils have moderate permeability's throughout their profiles,
with the exception where the dense and impermeable glacial till is
encountered where tends to perch waters. In these areas
foundation drains may be necessary. A high susceptibility to frost
action is a problem to sidewalks and driveways where a granular
base is not used. Sheet and rill erosion is a major concern
especially in the loess formed soils. The loess soils are very
erodible at the surface and when lacking vegetative or residue
cover the soils are very erosive in both the lower parts of the
subsoil and substratum.
General Development Reps.,
Kingsbury Prooerry Page 4
3.3 Land Use and Zoning
The land use designation of the site falls under the county jurisdiction as
A-2 Agricultural Protection District. However, as the site is annexed it will
retain the zoning of R-1 (Mixed Single Family District) zoned property. The
site falls within the boundaries of the Projected Urban Service Area. The
proposed land use for the site does not conflict with existing designations.
3.4 Utilities
3.4.1. Sanitary Sewer
Upon the completion of Wedgewood Hills Third subdivision sanitary
sewer will be inplace to serve the site from 55`h Street NW. The
sanitary line will be extended west along 55`h Street NW to serve
the Kingsbury site.
3.4.2. Watermain
Again, upon the completion of Wedgewood Hills Third subdivision
there will be a watermain stubbed out to 55`h Street NW. This main
will be extended westerly along 551h street NW to serve the
Kingsbury site as well.
3.4.3. Storm Sewer
No storm sewer system exists. Surface drainage flows to the ditch
of 55th Street NW or the surface runoff flows southerly to the low
lying areas of the adjacent property.
3.5 Access
Currently there is no public street access onto or off of the site to 55th
Street NW. The GDP proposes two public roadway accesses to serve the
development that will intersect with 55`h Street NW.
General Development Rep.,rt
Kinasbury Property Pace 5
4.0 PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4.1 Project Description and Scope
The attached GDP shows conceptually the proposed street pattern,
access to the adjoining roadway system and properties and the general lot
layout pattern for the site. All of the site will be used for single family
housing. The majority of lot sizes are generally less than a quarter of an
acre and ranging between 7200 SF for the smallest lot upwards to 15750
SF for the largest lot.
The project consists of 149 lots on 39.81 acres equaling a density of 3.74
units per acre. This is permitted as a Type I use under section 62.220,
62.221, & 62.222 of the City of Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land
Development Manuel. The proposed Development Plan is attached as
Exhibit D.
4.2 Access/Traffic Circulation
Access to the site will occur from two local public roads intersecting 55`h
St. NW. These future avenues will be platted with a 60' ROW and will
extend southerly through the property allowing a future access to the land
south of this site. In addition, a stubbed street will be planned in order to
also serve the future development of the land west of this site. All
roadways within the development will be classified as "local" streets.
4.3 Storm Water Management
It is the intent of the developer to voluntarily participate in the City's storm
water management plan and make a monetary contribution to a regional
storm facility. No on site detention is planned but on -sit erosion and
General Deveiooment Reo_.,
Kincsoury Property Paae 6
sedimentation control during construction will be provided in accordance
with MPCA Guidelines. This facility is proposed to be constructed on the
Weich and Seeger property.
4.4 Utilities
4.4.1. Sanitary Sewer
Public sanitary sewer will be extended from 55`h Street NW where it
is located in Wedgewood Hills Third subdivision. All of the sanitary
sewer is proposed to be gravity flow. The minimum diameter of pipe
shall be 8".
4.4.2. Watermain
This site will be served with the high level water system. The high
level system is necessary to serve access over the 1100 elevation.
The watermain stubbed out to 55`h Street NW from Wedgewood
Hills Third Subdivision will be extended to serve the site.
4.4.3. Storm Sewer System
Surface runoff will be directed to the ditch along 55`h St. NW which
will eventually flow into a nearby regional storm facility.
4.4.4. Electrical Service
This area is currently in the territory of Peoples Cooperative
Service. Electrical service is anticipated to be provided by RPU
when the site is annexed to the City of Rochester. Rochester Public
Utilities service lines will be accessed from Wedgewood Hills Third
Subdivision.
General Development Rep-,c
KinasDury Property Paae 7
4.4.5, Natural Gas Service
Natural gas service will be extended in 55`h Street NE from
Wedgewood Hills Third Subdivision.
4.5 Floodplain
The site does not contain any regulatory floodway or 100 year flood
boundary.
4.6 Phasing
The project will be completed in 2 phases. The first phase will occur on the
easterly portion of the site and includes 20 acres in which 75 lots will be
developed (Refer to Exhibit D GDP). The second phase will include the
balance of the site.
General Development Reocrt
Kinasoury Prooertv PeQe 8
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
Based on the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board's Environmental Review
Program, there is a requirement for a mandatory Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW) for phased or cumulative activities that convert 80 acres or
more to agricultural land to a more intense use. Since the site is less than 80
acres, there is no requirement for an EAW to be performed.
6.0 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
In approving a General Development Plan, the Commission and Council will
review the plan for compliance with the criteria for approval listed in section
61.215 which became effective May 15, 1999. The seven (7) criteria are listed
below and are followed by our response as to compliance.
Criteria 1:
The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map, or that the means for reconciling any
differences have been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously with
a rezoning or plan amendment request.
This property lies beyond the boundaries of the Rochester Urban Service Area
Land Use Plan. However, it is within the 25 year Urban Service Area for the City
on the adopted 1995 Olmsted County Future Land Use Plan Map.
Land use designation for this site would be low density residential which makes
the proposed project compatible with the land use. A land use plan amendment
and zone change will not be necessary.
General Deveicoment Reoor,
Kingsoury Prcoerty Pace 9
Criteria 2:
The proposed development, including its lot sizes. density, access, and
circulation are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of
adjacent property.
The density of the development as proposed is consistent with a low density
residential land use in the R-1 zoning district.
The proposed vehicular circulation system provides for an efficient design of local
streets, multiple access points to 551" Street NW, and connections to adjacent
undeveloped lands to the south and west of this property.
This site also allows for the opportunity to connect to the trail system via 55�"
Street NW as shown an the ROCOG Trail Plan.
Criteria 3:
The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans.
The Kingsbury Subdivision Project is a low density residential housing project
that will have a variety of housing styles. The density and lot sizes are consistent
with the City of Rochester Zoning and Ordinance and Land Development
Manual. This project is proposed to assist in meeting the need of affordable
housing in Rochester.
Criteria 4:
The proposed plan makes provisions for the planned capital improvements and
streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6 year Capital Improvement
Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, The ROCOG Long -Range Transportation
Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City.
Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and
Generai Development Reocrt
Klncsoury Prooerty Pace 10
projected background traffic is compatible with the existing uses and shown in
the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties.
The GDP is designed to accommodate additional right-of-way (50 feet onto
Kingsbury) to allow for upgrading of 551h Street NW.
Criteria 5:
On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the
development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will
provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those
adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance.
1. Street system adequacy shall be based on the street systems ability to
safely accommodate trips from the existing and planned land uses on the
existing and proposed street system without creating safety hazards,
generating auto stacking that blocks driveways or intersections, or
disrupting traffic flow on any street, as identified in the traffic impact report,
if required by Section 61.523. Capacity from improvements in the first 3
years of the 6-Year CIP shall be included in the assessment of adequacy.
The street system, as proposed, does safely accommodate the traffic
within the development and the proposed development to the south and
west. There may be a need for improvements to 55'h Street NW in the
future. The GDP provides additional right-of-way should this be
necessary.
2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land
use, or that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities to
serve the area of the proposed development and such utilities are the first
three years of the City's current 6-Year Capital Improvements Program, or
that other arrangements (contractual, development agreement,
Generai Development ReDc t
Kinasoury P,oDerty °aae 11
performance bond, etc.) have been made to ensure that adequate utilities
will be available concurrently with development. If needed utilities will not
be available concurrent with the proposed development, the applicant for
the development approval shall stipulate to a condition that no
development will occur and no further development permit will be issued
until concurrency has be evidenced.
Both water and sanitary sewer will be available to serve this property from
Wedgewood Hills Third subdivision and will be accessed from 551h St. NW.
Electric service and natural gas will be available also from 551h St. NW.
3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the level or
service standards in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for
development.
Off -site regional storm water facilities are planned to adequately handle
the surface water drainage. A neighborhood park lies within a quarter mile
of the site in Wedgewood Hills.
Criteria 6:
The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices, or that at the time of land
subdivision, a more detailed investigation will be provided to solve unusual
problems that have been identified.
Due to existing relief in topography, additional grading of the property will take
place to reduce existing slopes.
Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted to the City for each phase of the
project at the time of land subdivision, as will the erosion control plans. It is
Generai Deveiooment Reocrt
Kinasoury Prooeny Paae 12
anticipated that there are no unusual problems that cannot be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices.
Criteria 7:
The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot for residential
development are consistent with the subdivision design standards contained in
Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned development of
adjacent parcels.
The density, lot pattern, and street layout are consistent with the standards for
R-T zoning and are compatible with the surrounding area. Roadway connections
are planned to extend to the adjoining properties to allow for continued growth
and development of this area.
1995 ot,n�STEa
1�N�sau��r
McGhie Betts,
cow 1*"°
C..." A,- Iww & ,^
use PuHJ
<jugo��t�SwN
16" b AK IL Ad». Ill 'FICA N7-20-3911
.'fit-i�• .z. 7A
"♦i i � r
r?rams v• 208
„pr `c VKr•
in
- �. ,•'^ --mac+^ _ ��%� y a b -�
. ram•-•i-'� � :��-� .s � f .<- :. o` .� f.. _:' �GC
���1 � 11 � • • t - F -. !•r t k t
++� Y
t378
;' 3220295't
o�
ti
qN
gg
-32
ZB r a
ti
u'ttdC�SFSu�Y
SUe�r�iuis�dnl McGhie Betts,kw-
�9 ��= LaM S+wry•
16M }• I.0 SE y11�=, yl yyp� Sp]-?E!-]Yl•
Lf)(prvN
JF
I
rV
1
C,w+Vcs
LSOP
in
i
r � +tosiacnirt �..� xasc., - a� „aunc awaaooa - .—.• � -, ....
FM ANWROM
Y y grid u&am6IQ '� ff77aH aTgoox
IS l
h
y� a 91 Y .•..-.
l
N
I
Cat
'j.L
TV
17
I
; Ira=,
mi ,
,
, wing
bpl �Al
Al A
vA
N'S,�MPMPAWIMM
FAA
1ij -F"r
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Planner
DATE: February 4, 2000
Vi I F R
1CG�-
ROC HESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507/285.8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADORESSING/
5071285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGMRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
5071285-8213
WELUSEPTIC
507/285.8345
FAX
507/287-2275
RE: General Development Plan #146 to be known as Kingsbury Hills
and Request for Substantial Land Alteration
Planning Department Review:
Applicant/Owner: Bigelow Enterprises
PO Box 247
Byron, MN 55920
Consultants: McGhie & Betts, Inc.
1648 Third Ave. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Size and Location: The GDP includes approximately 79 acres of land
located south of 55'" St. NW, east of 60°" Ave. NW
and west of the Wedgewood Hills development.
Existing Land Use: The site is presently undeveloped.
Proposed Use: The GDP proposes to develop the property with low
density residential dwellings. Approximately 40 acres
of the site identifies future single family lots. The
remainder of the site identifies roadways and is
labeled "low density residential", Development of this
portion of the property will depend on the availability
and timing of City services.
Land Use Plan: This property is beyond the boundaries of the
Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. It is,
however, within the 25-year Urban Service Area for
the City of Rochester on the Olmsted County Future
Land Use Plan Map. Land Use Designations within
this area are considered to be "Low Density
Residential".
Zoning: An annexation petition on the north 40 acres is
currently in process. Upon annexation the property
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITYIAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2 / 71 1/General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
will be zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family). The
remainder of the property is zoned A-2 (Agricultural
Protection) in the County.
Streets:
Access to the site would be from 55" St. NW. A plan
showing two accesses to 55'" St. NW was submitted
and reviewed by the Planning staff and referral
agencies. In order to address concerns related the
location and site distance of the accesses, the
consultant revised the GDP and resubmitted it to
Planning on Wednesday February 2, 2000. The
revised Plan provides for one access to 551" St. NW.
It appears as though all roadways are proposed to be
public.
Sidewalks:
A pedestrian trail system will be required along the
south side of 55'" St. NW and sidewalk will be
required along both sides of all new public roadways.
In addition, due to the length of the blocks in this
GDP, mid -block pedestrian connections will also be
required.
Drainage:
The General Development Plan identifies existing
topography. The site currently drains to the
northeast, south/southeast and northwest. There are
no on -site detention facilities proposed with this
development. It is the intent of the applicant to
voluntarily participate in the City's Storm Water
Management Plan and contribute toward a regional
storm water facility.
Public Works will need to review grading and
drainage information for this property in more detail at
the Platting stage to determine whether the entire
property is eligible for contribution toward a regional
storm water facility.
Detailed grading and drainage plans will be required
when the property is platted.
Wetlands:
Minnesota Statutes now require that all developments
be reviewed for the presence of wetlands or hydric
soils. According to the Soils Survey, hydric soils exist
on this property. A delineation will need to be filed
with the LGU. LGU staff will need to conduct an on -
site investigation in the Spring to determine
boundaries or lack of wetlands. The applicant may
need to re -design the development to avoid
Wetlands, if they exist, and will need to obtain the
appropriate permits from the LGU.
Public Utilities:
Sewer and water services will be extended from the
Wedgewood Hills development.
Preliminary water modeling indicates that, in the
Page 3
•Jb General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
upper portions of the property, flows for fire protection
will temporarily be below the minimum required by the
Fire Prevention Bureau for residential use. The
request for approval to change elevations by more
Than 10' within this development, would aid in
improving flows.
Electric service is currently outside of RPU service
territory but RPU does intend to serve the property in
the future.
Parkland Dedication: Parkland dedication requirements for this
development should be via cash in lieu of land, equal
to an estimated 3'/2 acres of land.
Environmental Review: Although the applicant's narrative report states that a
Mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet is
not required for this project based on its size, it
appears as though the development may meet other
thresholds which require an EAW. According to MN
Rules, 4410.4300 subp. 19, D, a residential
development of 250 unattached units also requires a
Mandatory EAW. The availability of services to the
southern 40 acres and the amount of development
that it will provide will impact the need for a
Mandatory EAW on this property. Staff will need
additional information about the development
potential for that portion of the property to make a
determination on the need for an EAW.
Referral Comments: Planning Dept. Transportation Division; Rochester
Public Works; John Harford, Planning Dept. &
Wetlands RGU; Rochester Park & Recreation;
Rochester Fire Department (see attached); RPU
Water Division (see attached)
Report Attachments: 1. Reduced Copy of GDP
2. Area Map
3. Referral Comments (6)
4. Proposed General Development Plan Narrative
Staff Suggested Findings and Recommendation:
Paragraph 61.215 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual lists the
criteria for approval of a general development plan (see attached section from the newly adopted
regulations, which became affective May 15, 1999.
Criteria A. The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and zoning map, or that the means for reconciling any differences have
been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously with a rezoning or
plan amendment request.
Page 4
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
III
This property is beyond the boundaries of the Rochester Urban Service Area
Land Use Plan. It is, however, within the 25-year Urban Service Area for the City
of Rochester on the Olmsted County Future Land Use Plan Map. Land Use
Designations within this area are considered to be "Low Density Residential".
Criteria B. The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation
are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent
property.
The density of development proposed is consistent with a low density residential
land use designation. Due to the long block lengths, mid -block pedestrian
connections will need to be provided.
Criteria C. The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans.
The development density is consistent with a Low Density Residential land use
designation of the Land Use Plan and is generally consistent with the Housing
Plan and the standards for the physical and social environments of residential
neighborhoods.
Criteria 0. The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and
streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6-Year Capital Improvement
Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation
Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City.
Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and
projected background traffic are compatible with the existing uses and uses
shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties.
The proposed GDP, with 148lots, in combination with the existing and
undeveloped lots in the Wedgewood development, will generate approximately
3000 trips per day. This level of trip making will utilize the capacity of the existing
street, and it would be our recommendation that no further development beyond
that included in the Wedgewood and Kingsbury developments be approved until a
financing plan is developed for upgrading 55" St. to collector street standards.
Criteria E. On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the
development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will
provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those
adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance.
Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to
safely accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the
existing and proposed street system without creating safety hazards,
generating auto stacking that blocks driveways or intersections, or
disrupting traffic flow on any street, as identified in the traffic impact
report, if required by Section 61.523(C). Capacity from improvements in
the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the assessment of
adequacy.
The proposed GDP, with 148lots, in combination with the existing and
undeveloped lots in the Wedgewood development, will generate approximately
3000 trips per day. This level of trip making will utilize the capacity of the existing
street, and 4 would be our recommendation that no further development beyond
that included in the Wedgewood and Kingsbury developments be approved until a
financing plan is developed for upgrading 550 St. to collector street standards.
C qOPage 5 /
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
Due to the long block lengths, mid -block pedestrian connections will need to be
provided.
2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land
use, or that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities
to serve the area of the proposed development and such utilities are in
the first three years of the City's current 6-Year Capital Improvements
Program, or that other arrangements (contractual, development
agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to ensure that
adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If
needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed
development, the applicant for the development approval shall stipulate
to a condition that no development will occur and no further development
permit will be issued until concurrency has been evidenced.
Sewer and water services will be extended from the Wedgewood Hills
development.
Preliminary water modeling indicates that, in the upper portions of the property,
flows for fire protection will temporality be below the minimum required by the Fire
Prevention Bureau for residential use. The request for approval to change
elevations by more than f 0' within this development, would aid in improving flows.
3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the level of
service standards in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for
development.
Parkland dedication requirements for this development should be via cash in lieu
of land, equal to an estimated 3/: acres of land.
Criteria F. The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices, or that, at the time of land
subdivision, a more detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to
solve unusual problems that have been identified.
Public Works will need to review grading and drainage information for this
property in more detail at the Platting stage to determine whether the entire
property is eligible for contribution toward a regional storm water facility.
Criteria G. The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for
residential development are consistent with the subdivision design standards
contained in Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned
development of adjacent parcels.
Proposed roadways provide connections to adjacent properties and allow for
continued growth and development of those properties. The proposed densities
are compatible with existing and planned development of adjacent parcels. Due
to the length of the blocks, mid -block pedestrian connections will be needed.
Page 6 / n
General Development Plan t a
February 4, 2000
Substantial Land Alteration:
Section 62.1102 of the LDM allows the City to consider a request for excavation or substantial
land alteration activity as part of a Type III application, such as a GDP, subject to making findings
established in Sections 62.1105 and 61.146 of the LDM.
If the Planning Commission and City Council approve the proposed substantial land
alteration, staff recommends the following findings to Sections 62.1105 and 61,146 of the
Rochester Zoning Ordinance & Land Development Manual:
62.1105
1) The activity should not result in danger to life or property. The knob of a hill is being proposed
to cut down to allow for the development of single family homes and grades created will not
be greater than 3:1. The grading and drainage plans will need to comply with City standards
and be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department.
2) The grading plan for this project needs to be approved by the Rochester Public Works
Department and it will document the extent of the work. All cut material will be used to fill in
the low area of the site. Noise and dust control will need to comply with City standards.
Areas of hydric soils are shown on the GDP which must be reviewed further to determine
whether Wetlands exist. Staff will need to conduct an on -site review in the spring to
determine boundaries or lack of Wetlands. No grading or filling of these areas shall occur
prior to obtaining "no -loss" or replacement approval from the LGU.
3) The equipment conducting the grading work on the property will also be the equipment utilized
to move the earth. All excess material will be used on the site so no trucks will be hauling
from the property.
4) The proposed excavation work should not affect air quality or ground and surface water
quality. Detailed grading and drainage plans will be required prior any grading activity. Staff
will need to conduct an on -site review in the spring to determine boundaries or lack of
Wetlands. No grading or filling of these areas shall occur prior to obtaining "no -loss" or
replacement approval from the LGU.
5) The proposing grading work should not adversely affect the scenic quality of Rochester.
There will not be any steep slopes or exposed rock faces. The grading of the site will allow
for single family dwellings, and the maximum grade will not exceed 3:1.
6) The result of the proposed activity will be compatible with existing development and
development anticipated in the future. The finished result of the grading work will allow for low
density residential development which is consistent with the land use plan.
7) The grading will be confined to the property and should not affect the use and enjoyment of
adjacent properties. The duration of the excavation activity will only last for the grading for the
subdivision.
8) The grading activity will only take place during the construction of the roadways and homes
that are planned for the site. The grading work is expected to be done in 3 or 4 phases with
each phase lasting approximately 6 weeks. Once the grading is finished, the site will have
home constructed on it.
9) The grading plan will need to provide the proper restoration and stabilization in accordance
with the adopted codes for the City of Rochester.
01-
Page 7
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
10) The grading and drainage for this plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the City at
the Platting stage. Stormwater management is required for the development.
11) Areas of hydric soils are shown on the GDP which must be reviewed further to determine
whether Wetlands exist. Staff will need to conduct an on -site review in the spring to
determine boundaries or lack of Wetlands. No grading or rifling of these areas shall occur
prior to obtaining 'no-foss"or replacement approval from the LGU. This area is identified as
"low probability" for sinkholes on the Geologic Atlas for Olmsted County.
12) The grading work is expected to be done in 3 or 4 phases with each phase lasting
approximately 6 weeks. The duration seems appropriate for this type of activity and the size
of the project.
13) The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve the grading and
drainage plan for this work. this plan must accommodate permanent and interim erosion and
sediment control.
14) Surety will need to be provided that guarantees the site will be fully restored after the
completion of the excavation activity. This surety can be provided through the owner contract
process for this development.
15) The grading and drainage plan will need to be approved by the Rochester Public Works
Department prior to any grading on the property.
Staff suggests that standards 1-3 and 5-8 of Section 61.146 (Standards for Conditional Use) are
not applicable to the excavation activity and suggests the following finding for Standard #4.
#4 The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve the grading and
drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate permanent and interim erosion and
sediment control.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Substantial Land Alteration based on the above suggested
findings and subject to the conditions and modifications listed below.
Staff recommends the following modifications or conditions based on the above findings and in
order to assure compliance with the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual:
Storm water management must be provided for this development. On -site detention is
not being proposed with the GDP. Based on current policy, the owner may request to
participate in the City's Regional Stormwater Plan and pay and applicable stormwater
management fee. Allowance of participation is at the City's discretion. Based on the
topography of this site, on -site detention may be required for a portion of the
northwest corner of the property. Any on -site stormwater facilities serving 50
developable acres or less will remain private, and execution of a long term
maintenance and ownership agreement will be required. All required private
stormwater facahles must be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of
development
2. When platted, 60' of right-of-way will be required for 550 St. NW and controlled access
must be provided along the entire length of 550' St. NW, with the exception of the street
access approved through the GDP. Additional controlled access for private driveways
Page 8
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
r�3
will be required within 50 feet from the intersections of any new road(s) with the 55`" St.
NW right-of-way.
3. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required from 5e St. NW
4. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 550 St. NW. Current City policy for
substandard streets would require a contribution of $30 per foot of frontage. If a
Traffic Improvement District (TID) is adopted for 55f8 St. NW, development of this
property may be subject to additional charges.
S. At the time of platting, easements will be required for off -site utilities.
6. Parkland dedication for this development shall be satisfied by cash in lieu of land.
7. Areas of hydric soils are shown on the GDP which must be reviewed further to
determine whether Wetlands exfsL Staff will need to conduct an on -site review in the
spring to determine boundaries or lack of Wetlands. No grading or filling of these
areas shall occur prior to obtaining "no -loss" or replacement approval from the LOU.
IN
Page 9
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
62.11.05 FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR ISSUANCE OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS (for excavation or substantial land alteration activities) :
The City shall approve a conditional use permit authorizing an excavation activity only if all of the
following findings with respect to the proposed activity are made, in addition to those listed in
Section 61.146:
1) The activity will not result in a danger to life or property due to (1) steep or unstable slopes, (2)
unsafe access to the property, (3) excessive traffic, or (4) proximity to existing or planned
residential areas, parks and roadways;
2) Visual, noise, dust, and/or excessive on- or off -site environmental impacts on public parks,
roadways and residential areas can be adequately mitigated by the Applicant and a fully detailed
plan is submitted by the Applicant to demonstrate the mitigation methods to be used, the cost of
such mitigation, the source of funds for such mitigation, and adequate legal assurance that all of
such mitigation activities are carried out;
3) The use of trucks and heavy equipment will not adversely impact the safety and maintenance
of public roads providing access to the site, or such impacts will be mitigated;
4) The proposed use will not adversely affect air quality or ground water or surface water quality;
5) The proposed use will not adversely affect the scenic quality of Rochester or the natural
landscapes, environment, wildlife and wildlife habitat; or if such effects are anticipated to occur,
the reclamation plan provides for adequate restoration of the site following completion of the
excavation activity;
6) The activity will be compatible with existing development and development anticipated in the
future, including other uses as shown in the Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to:
patterns of land use, recreational uses, existing or planned development, public facilities, open
space resources and other natural resources;
7) The activity will not unduly affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties;
8) The site plan provides for adequate buffers and screening year-round from unsightly features
of the excavation operation;
9) The reclamation plan provides for adequate and appropriate restoration and stabilization of
cut and fill areas;
10) The excavation activity will not result in negative impacts on drainage patterns or stormwater
management facilities;
11) The proposed activity will minimize impacts on sinkholes, wetlands and other natural
features affecting ground water or surface water quality;
12) The intensity and the anticipated duration of the proposed excavation activity is appropriate
for the size and location of the activity;
13) Permanent and interim erosion and sediment control plans have been approved by the City,
14) Surety has been provided that guarantees the site will be fully restored, after completion of
the excavation activity, to a safe condition, and one that permits reuse of the site in a manner
compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood plans, the Land Use Plan and applicable
City policies.
II
Page 10
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
15) The proposed activity complies with the requirements of the adopted building code.
61.146 Standards for Conditional Uses: The zoning administrator, Commission, or
Council shall approve a development permit authorizing a conditional use unless one or more of
the following findings with respect to the proposed development is made:
1) Provisions for vehicular loading, unloading, parking and for vehicular and pedestrian
circulation on the site and onto adjacent public streets and ways will create hazards to safety, or
will impose a significant burden upon public facilities.
1857'
2) The intensity, location, operation, or height of proposed buildings and structures will be
detrimental to other private development in the neighborhood or will impose undue burdens on the
sewers, sanitary and storm drains, water or similar public facilities.
3) The provision for on -site bufferyards and landscaping does not provide adequate protection to
neighboring properties from detrimental features of the development.
4) The site plan fails to provide for the soil erosion and drainage problems that may be created
by the development.
5) The provisions for exterior lighting create undue hazards to motorists traveling on adjacent
public streets or are inadequate for the safety of occupants or users of the site or such provisions
damage the value and diminish the usability of adjacent properties.
6) The proposed development will create undue fire safety hazards by not providing adequate
access to the site, or to the buildings on the site, for emergency vehicles.
7) In cases where a Phase I plan has been approved, there is a substantial change in the Phase
11 site plan from the approved Phase I site plan, such that the revised plans will not meet the
standards provided by this paragraph.
8) The proposed conditional use does not comply with all the standards applying to permitted
uses within the underlying zoning district, or with standards specifically applicable to the type of
conditional use under consideration, or with specific ordinance standards dealing with matters
such as signs which are part of the proposed development, and a variance to allow such deviation
has not been secured by the applicant.
(SIO
FROM: Planning Department, Transportation Division
City GDP #146 55 St. is designated as a collector street on the Long Range
Kingsbury Thoroughfare Plan and the corridor is designated for development of a
Neighborhood Connector Trail on the Long Range Bicycle Plan. The
collector street designation in combination with the trail designation will
require a right of way of 120'. This corridor currently meets local road
standards and in the future will need to be upgraded to handle the
expected level of traffic that will be generated by full development of
properties along the corridor. The plan to upgrade 55'" St. will also need to
identify on which side of the corridor the future trail will be located
The proposed GDP, with 148 lots, in combination with the existing and
undeveloped lots in the Wedgewood development, will generate
approximately 3000 trips per day. This level of trip making will utilize the
capacity of the existing street, and it would be our recommendation that no
further development beyond that included in the Wedgewood and
Kingsbury developments be approved until a financing plan is developed
for upgrading 55'" St. to collector street standards.
The access points proposed with the development meet desirable spacing
standards and fit with the current grade of 55" St. in order to provide
adequate site distance. Because of the way property lines are arranged on
the north side of 55'" St., particularly to the west of this site, we do have a
concern whether the existing grades on 55'" St. are appropriate to provide
adequate site distance for the access locations that are likely to occur on
the north side of the road. This could in particular affect the westerly
access of the development, which is proposed at the crest of the hill. The
crest of this hill may have to lowered in order to provide adequate site
distance for future intersections west of this development on the north side
of the street. As the development of site and street grades are developed
this factor should be evaluated to make sure proposed site grades will
work in the future given the need to potentially lower the crest of the hill.
We would also note and make of record at this time our conclusion that the
combined access needs of properties on the north and south side will
probably require that access for the remaining tract that lies between the
proposed Kingsbury development and CR 104 on the south side of 55'" St.
be limited to one access point, and that the second access for
development of that property needs to be planned to occur on CR 104.
This conclusion is based on the presence of a couple of small property
frontages occurring on the north side of the street, which will impact the
ability to provide adequate soacino between access locations.
xocxesTex
Minnesota
1,3 L'00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
191
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4i° Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507.257-7800
FAX — 507-281.6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for General Development
Plan #146.on the Bigelow Enterprises (Kingsbury Hills) property. The following are
Public Works comments on the proposal:
Storm Water Management must be addressed for this development. On -site
detention is not being proposed by the GDP plan. Based on current City
policy, the owner may request to participate in the City's Regional Stormwater
Plan and pay an applicable stormwater management fee. Allowance of
participation is at the City's discretion. Based on the topography of this site,
on -site detention may be required for a portion of the northwest corner of the
subject property. Any on -site stormwater facilities serving 50 developable
acres or less will remain private, and execution of a long term maintenance &
ownership agreement will be required. All required private stormwater
facilities must be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of
development.
2. Controlled access must be provided along the entire length of 55'" St NW,
with the exception of the street accesslaccesses that are approved through
the GDP. Additional controlled access for private driveways will be required
within 50 feet from the intersections of any new road(s) with the 551" St NW
ROW.
3. The GDP plan indicates two access points to 55`" St NW. The western
access point should be realigned eastward approximately 330 feet, and the
proposed easterly access should be eliminated. Staff would recommend
providing an east / west connection between the east''/i and west ''/s of the
proposed north 40 acres of the development.
4. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required from 55" St NW.
5. Dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way will be required for 551" St NW.
C.4TEMP1GDP146.doc
lig ROCHESTER
Minnesota
1/31100
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
[DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 0 Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
6. Pedestrian facilities will be required along both sides of all new public roads,
and along all the south side of 551" St NW. A 10 foot bituminous bike path
may be required along 55" St in lieu of a concrete sidewalk.
7. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 551" St NW. Current City
policy for substandard streets would require a contribution of $30.00 per foot
of frontage. If a Traffic Improvement District is adopted for 55 h St NW,
development of this property may be subject to additional charges.
8. The extension of sanitary sewer to serve the southeastern portion of this
property is subject to the development of the vacant property between the
Wedgewood Hills development and this property. Easements will be required
for off -site utilities.
9. Specific routing of sanitary sewer lines will be reviewed further during the
platting stages.
10. Execution of a City / Owner Contract will be required prior to construction of
public infrastructure.
11. Pedestrian and vehicular access must be provided to the neighborhood park.
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property (rates are
subject to annual review and change):
J9173 "Trunk Sanitary Sewer in 55"' St NW Area" @ $392.54 per acre plus 7.5%
interest from May 16, 1994, for the northeast 12.5 acres of the site (based on
current policy).
Remainder of the property subject to Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)
@ $1605.50 per developable acre.
Water Availability Charge (WAC) @ $1605.50 per developable acre.
Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division.
Storm Water Management Fee (if on -site detention is not provided).
A proportional share of the cost of reconstructing 55th St NW.
CATEMP\GIDP146.doc
/
ROCHESTER PARK AND t.�CREATION DEPARTMENT
j
MEMORANDUM r$q
DATE: January 19, 2000
TO: Suzanne LaPalm
Planning
SUBJECT: Kingsbury Hills General Development Plant #146
Parkland dedication for the proposed development to be in the form of cash in lieu of
land.
The development will have an estimated dedication requirement of 3`/2 acres.
+:\=AAn\D3iGT:.'+. �.�G:�GEGi CATION\NW 2898\KINGS2URY 'r=L3 GGP.GOC
(40
Application Number:
No hydric soils exist on the site based on the Soil Survey
Hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property
owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and
submitting the information as part of this application.
A wetland delineation has been carried out for the property and is on file
with the Planning Department
_ A wetland delineation is on file with the Planning Department and a No -
loss, Exemption, or Replacement Plan has been submitted to the Planning
Department.
A wetland related application has been approved by the City. This plan
incorporates the approved wetland plan.
No hydric soils exist on the property based on the Soil Survey. However,
due to the location in the landscape the property owner should examine
the site for wetlands. The property owner is responsible for identifying
wetlands.
Other or Explanation
From John Harford
Wetlands LGU Representative
rpu
:ve pGei�e. ;ve deitrer
January 24, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: General Development Plan # 146 by Bigelow Enterprises to be known as
Kingsbury Hills.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
01
Our review of the referenced general development plan is complete and our comments follow:
1. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments.
The Land Development Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department
determines the applicability of these fees.
2. Northwest High Level Water System service is available at the extreme NE comer of this
property at Wedgewood Hills Third Subdivision. Preliminary water system modeling
indicates however that, in the upper portions of this property, flows for fire protection
temporarily will be below the minimum required by the Fire Prevention Bureau for
residential use. This will be remedied with the planned further networking of the water
system near the 50th Ave. and 55`h St. NW area.
3. The water system in this area will need to be looped together to create a network capable of
providing adequate fire flows and water quality. Extensions will also need to be made per our
standard policy to provide service to adjoining properties. We will work with the applicant's
engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout to serve this area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours, �,�������%%��
C" P111 L
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
Bigelow Enterprises
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542
Iqas- ,
McGhie Betts,
Consulting Engineers 11
Land Surveyors
Planners
1648 Third Avenue S.E., Rochester, MN 55904 507-289-3919 Fax 289-7333
1604 Riverview Lane, Northfield, MN 55057 507.645-0964 Fax 645-2842
January 14, 2000
Ms. Mitzi Baker
Consolidated Planning Dept
2122 Campus Drive
Rochester, MN 55904
RE: Exemption from Section 62.1101.2 (a) for the Kingsbury Property
Dear Ms, Baker:
Section 62.1101 of the Rochester Land Development Manual and Zoning Ordinance contains new
standards for substantial land alteration projects. The grading of the Kingsbury site will result in
exceeding a 10-foot vertical cut and a 10-foot vertical fill over various portions of the site, primarily
in the central area of the project. This project meets the definition of Section 62.1101.2.a.1(d)
where the cut/fill involves a grade change of 10-feet or more from the pre-existing grades. The
enclosed general development plan indicates the cut and fill areas on the site. The raw cut volume
is approximately 300,000 cubic yards. All excess materials will be placed on the 79-acre site. The
maximum extreme cut would be approximately 18' and that would occur on the northwestern
portion of the site. The maximum amount of fill would be approximately 20' on the east central part
of the site (See GDP).
Section 62,1102.1.F provides for an exemption provided there are sufficient findings made as
contained in 62.1105. The following are suggested findings in support of the request:
62.11050-15).
1. The activity necessary to grade the portions in excess of 18-foot vertical cut/fill will not
result in unstable slopes or unsafe access. The slopes on the west edge of the site will be
a maximum of 3:1 and only a small portion of the grading would involve an excess of an 18-
foot cut. The cut/fill areas are not adjacent to a planned park area.
2. The environmental impacts of grading on this site to adjacent properties will be minimal
because there is vacant land on three sides of the property. The grading activity will also
be kept back approximately 150' from 55' St. NW.
3. There will be two access points to the site. It will not be necessary to truck in fill or haul fill
off of the site, so that will minimize the impact on the surrounding roads.
4. The additional grading will not adversely affect air quality. The cut/fill is not near the ground
water and grading that is necessary to create a regional storm water facility.
5. The natural topography of the area will be re -graded to provide adequate slopes for single —
famiiy dwellings, but the overall scenic quality will be maintained.
6. The grading is compatible with the proposed adjacent neighborhood developments.
The grading will be confined to the Kingsbury site and will not unduly affect the use and
enjoyment of adjacent properties.
K. M. MCGh*. PE., L.S. 1904-1975 William E. Tointan, C.E.T. President James E. Swanson, L.S. Vice President David L. Momll, P E. Vice President
Douglas N. Beim. PE., L.S. Vice President Andrew J. Masterpole, ASLA Lang J. Shannon, L.S. Michael E. Gawm. PE., L.S.
Mark E. Severtson. L.S. Denial J. Zemke, PE.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
jq5
8. The grading activity will take place in 3 or 4 phases with each phase taking approximately 6
weeks. There are only two homes in the immediate area that will be visually affected by the
grading activity.
9. The grading plan will provide for proper restoration stabilization in accordance with the
codes for the City of Rochester.
10. The grading will not result in negative impacts on the drainage patterns. The site will still
drain from the central portion of the site without the need for a detention pond.
11. The area of grading does not contain sinkholes or wetlands and will not affect the
groundwater or the subsurface water quality once restoration and stabilization is completed.
12. The grading of the site will take place in 3 or 4 phases with each phase taking
approximately 6 weeks. This time frame is appropriate for the size and location of this
activity.
13. Permanent and interim (during construction) erosion/sedimentation control will be provided
for in the grading plan. The city will review and approve this grading plan.
14. A performance and payment bond is required for all work associated with the construction
of the public improvements. This bond will be submitted with the owner/contractor.
15. The activity is not associated with the building code ordinance 62.1100 and the standards in
the Land Development Manual and on file with Public Works shall apply to the design
standards and construction process.
Very truly yours,
McGHIE & BETTS INC.
014 , WoL !
Andrew J. Masterpole, ASLA
AJM/sg
pc: Harvey Ratzloff
Joel Bigelow
Page 13
la City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
{{{{ Hearing Date: February 9, 2000
c. atorm water management must be provided for this development. Any facility
serving 50 or less developable acres will remain private and will require execution of
long term Maintenance agreements and easements.
3. Easements off site utilities and a temporary turn -a -round at the east end of "660
St. NW" shall executed prior to recording the Final Plat Documents for this
property.
00000
4. In addition to c\ncttion of sidewalk along bot es of all new public roads, a 10'
wide bituminourian facility is require ong Bandel Rd. NW.
5. The applicant shall ente to a
obligations of the applicaikireh
park dedication, traffic imp e
and contributions for public f
6. Parkland dedication for tt
Mr. Brede asked if there aria lot of booster
Wbnt agreement with the City that outlines the
but not limited to, storm water management,
pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication,
shall be met via cash in lieu of land,
Mr. Tointon replied that there are not a lot of
operate.
in the City.
and he provided an explanation of how they
General Development Plan #146 by Bigelow Enterprises to be known as Kingsbury Hills
The applicant proposes to develop approximately 80 acres with single family detached
housing. The development would be served with public roadways The applicant is also
requesting approval of a Substantial Land Alteration for the proposed cut and fill work
for the development The property is located south of 55 Street NW, west of the
Ms. Baker presented the staff report, dated February 4, 2000, to the Commission. The staff
report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department.
Ms. Baker presented a map and explained the location, noting the property consists of just
under 80 acres to be developed with low density residential uses. The number of lots in the
south 40 acres will depend on the extension of sewer and water. She stated that staff is again
recommending mid -block pedestrian connections and the revised Subdivision Regulations
contain specific criteria for when the mid -block connections should be required. The
topography on this site may pose some challenges for providing those, so similar language can
be included to state "Mid -block connections be provided unless determined to be unfeasible by
the City Engineer, due to topographic constraints." Ms. Baker explained that the applicant is
also proposing a Substantial Land Alteration and she pointed out the area on the map that will
need to be re -graded. She stated they are not proposing to haul material off -site and there will
not be any grades steeper than 3:1 when finished. Ms. Baker commented that the knob of the
hill will be removed, leaving rolling terrain, and she pointed out the area where the fill will be
deposited, stating that areas of hydric soils will need to be evaluated before any filling takes
place. She explained that staff recommends approval subject to 7 conditions and added an 80'
l
Page 14
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Heanng Date: Febtuary 9, 2000
condition to state, "Due to the block lengths in this development, mid -block pedestrian
connections shall be provided, except where the City Engineer determines topographic
conditions make the pedestrian trails unfeasible."
Mr. Quinn asked if there is a time frame tied to the improvements of 55" Street NW.
Ms. Baker explained this is similar to the situation on 50" Avenue NW in that the road only has
so much capacity, and this development will be contributing to using up the capacity on 5V
Street, so they have to limit the trips per day until the road is reconstructed.
Mr. Quinn asked if this should be included in the plat instead.
Ms. Baker stated it should be included in both the GDP and plat. She explained that the
adequacy of public facilities needs to be considered in the GOP and if the current roadways
don't have adequate capacity to handle this development and that of adjacent properties, it
needs to be addressed now.
Representing the applicant, Bill Tointon, McGhie & Betts, Inc., addressed the Commission. He
presented a location map, and explained they originally had two access points to 55'hStreet,
and now only have one. Mr. Tointon stated they have asked for a temporary access to 55 h
Street for construction, and that will be covered in the development agreement with the City,
which will occur in the platting stage. He stated they are in agreement with the conditions, and
the additional condition suggested by Ms. Baker, if it contains the stipulation of the City
Engineer determining feasibility. He pointed out they are asking for separate action by the
Commission on the Substantial Land Alteration. Mr. Tointon made himself available for
questions.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing.
Ms. Schultze moved to approve General Development Plan #146, to be known as
Kingsbury Hills, with staff -suggested findings and conditions, including the additional
condition as stated by Ms. Baker, Mr. Slaver seconded the motion, which carried 7-0.
Conditions:
Storm water management must be provided for this development. On -site detention
is not being proposed with the GDP. Based on current policy, the owner may request
to participate in the City's Regional Storm Water Plan and pay any applicable storm
water management fee. Allowance of participation is at the City's discretion. Based
on the topography of this site, on -site detention may be required for a portion of the
northwest corner of the property. Any on -site storm water facilities serving 50
developable acres or less will remain private, and execution of a long term
maintenance and ownership agreement will be required. All required private storm
water facilities must be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of
development.
2 When platted, 60' of right-of-way will be required for 5e St. NW and controlled
access must be provided along the entire length of 5e St. NW, with the exception of
the street access approved through the GDP. Additional controlled access for
Page 15
144
City Planning and Zon[n¢ Commission Minutes
Heann¢ Date: February 9. 2000
private driveways will be required within 50 feet from the intersections of any new
road(s) with the 5r St. NW right-of-way.
3. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required from 5e St NW,
4. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 5e St. NW. Current City policy
for substandard streets would require a contribution of $30 per foot of frontage. If a
Traffic Improvement District (T1D) is adopted for 55 h St. NW, development of this
property may be subject to additional charges.
5. At the time of platting, easements will be required for off -site utilities.
5. Parkland dedication for this development shall be satisfied by cash in lieu of land.
7. Areas of hydric soils are shown on the GDP which must be reviewed further to
determine whether wetlands exist. Staff will need to conduct an on -site review in the
spring to determine boundaries or lack of wetlands. No grading or filling of these
areas shall occur prior to obtaining "no -loss" or replacement approval from the LGU.
8. Due to the block lengths in this development, mid -block pedestrian connections shall
be provided, except where the City Engineer determines topographic conditions
make the pedestrian traits unfeasible.
Ms. Schultze moved to approve the Substantial Land Alteration, and expressed
appreciation that information on the cut and fill sections was provided. She stated that
in the future, an aerial photo of the area to be filled would be appreciated. Mr. Staver
seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0.
The Chair called a break and reconvened the meeting after 10 minutes.
Ms. Baker presented the staff report, a February 4, 2000, to the Commission. The staff
report is on file at the Rochester—OLfsted Nnning Department.
Ms. Baker presented and explai d a map of th roposed GDP. She reviewed access,
wetlands, parkland, and ph She pointed out at the initial portion of the development
won't have access to 50`" Av ue NW. Ms. Baker re ed to the staff -suggested findings and
conditions, noting approval recommended subject to 11 conditions. She referred to the
first condition, and noted ' also applied to other develop is on the west side of 50th Avenue
that didn't have the oppo unity of taking access through exi 'ng subdivisions. Because there
are other conditions listed that limit the number of trips to 50'" venue until it is reconstructed,
r
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AU1=NUA JrU I IUN:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
EM DESCRIPTION: General
March 1, 2000
City Planninc and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
ORIGINATING DEPT:
PLANNING
Graves
i
MEETING 1%
DATE: 3-6-00 1
ITEM NO./
6`7
PREPARED BY:
Mitzi A. Baker,
Mr. Quinn moved to approve General Development Plan #147, to be known as Hypointe, with staff -suggested findings and
conditions, with condition number one deleted, and condition number 3 reworded per Ms. Baker. Mr. Brede seconded the
motion. The motion carried 5-2 with Ms. Schultze and Mr. Werven voting nay. The Commission recommends approval subject
to the following conditions or modifications:
1. Storm water management must be provided for this development Any ponds serving 50 developable acres or less will
remain private, and execution of long term maintenance and ownership agreements will be required. All required private
storm water facilities must be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of development
2. The property shall be platted. When platted, the controlled access shall be provided along the entire length of 501" Avenue
NW and 65"Street NW, except for the one private road access, two public road accesses, and one future public road
access, as shown art the GDP. When platted, controlled access will also be required within 50 feet from the intersections of
any roads with 500 Avenue NW or 6V Street NW. In addition, 60 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for both 500 Ave.
NW and 65`" St NW.
3. Right andlor left turn lanes will be required along 50`" Ave. NW and 65" St NW.
4. Traffic from the units lying to the east(south of the wetland and drainage way will primarily travel to the east and south
through North Park to access Se St NW. This portion of the development shall contribute $40 per dwelling unit toward a
fund that will be dedicated to Implementing the North Park neighborhood traffic management plan.
S. The development shall be phased so that traffic volumes on 50`" Ave. NW, north of 5e St. NW, do not exceed approximately
3,000 average daily trips until it is reconstructed. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 500 Ave. NW, and
65'" St NW. Current City policy for substandard streets would require a contribution of $30 per foot of frontage along both
roadways. The City is currently considering a Traffic Improvement District (TID) for this area. if a T1D is adopted,
development of this property may be subject to additional charges.
6. A Wetland Replacement Plan will be required for any wedand filling. Any necessary permits for said activity shall be
secured prior to plat approval. In addition, the applicant or consultant shall consult the MPCA and Army Corps of Engineers
regarding the use of the existing farm pond for storm water management as part of this development If use of this facility
is not approved by said agencies, the GDP will need to be revised to identify alternate area for storm water detention.
7. Park dedication requirement shall be met through a combination of land and cash. The grading plan for this property will
need to include grading two moderately sloped areas for locating neighborhood play equipment and turf play fields, per the
specifications of the Park & Recreation Department
B. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Rochester that outlines the obligations of the
applicant relating to, but not limited to; storm water management; park dedication; traffic improvements; pedestrian
facilities; contributions for public infrastructure, including contribution obligations toward traffic improvements in the area
attributable to this project; and long term maintenance and ownership of landscape islands shown on the GDP within the
cul-de-sacs.
9. The 30' access easement shown in Phase 1 shall be part of the oudot for the park/open space area and not an easement
10. A revised GDP shall be tiled with the Planning Department reflecting all required modifications, Including identifying
pedestrian trails along the east side of 500 Ave. NW and the south side of Be St NW and widening the trait through the
wettandlopen space corridor to 10 feet
_'OUNCIL ACTION: Motion
Second
N
r.
I
Nw
CRAM
CIDP
4CM
L)F
T-+tx g - 6
3.(-00 Agenda
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT J
FOR GRAVES PROPERTY
IN SECTION 3 OF CASCADE TOWNSHIP
ROCHESTER, MiNNES®TA
JANUARY 2000
McGhie Betts, Inc.
Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors
Planners
1648 Third Avenue S.E., Rochester, MN 55904 507-289-3919
1188 Highway Three South, Northfield, MN 55057 507-645-0964
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT
FOR GRAVES PROPERTY
IN SECTION 8 OF CASCADE TOWNSHIP
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
Prepared For:
Arcon Development Inc.
7625 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
Prepared By:
MCGHIE & BETTS, INC.
1648 Third Ave. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
(507) 289-3919
January12, 2000
INDEX
TITLE SHEET
INDEX
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 HISTORYIBACKGROUND
3.0 SITE ANALYSIS
3.1
Location
3.2
Site Characteristics
3.3
Soils (See Exhibit C)
3.4
Wetlands
3.5
Land Use and Zoning
3.6
Utilities
3.6.1 Sanitary Sewer
3.6.2 Watermain
3.6.3 Storm Sewer
3.6.4 Access
4.0 PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4.1
Project Description and Scope
4.2
Access/Traffic Circulation
4.3
Pedestrian Circulation
4.4
Storm Water Management
4.5
Utilities
4.5.1 Sanitary Sewer
4.5.2 Watermain
4.1.3 Storm Sewer System
4.1.4 Electrical Service
4.1.5 Natural Gas Service
4.2
Floodplain
4.3
Parkland
4.4
Phasing
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
6.0 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Criteria A:
Criteria B:
Criteria C:
Criteria D:
Criteria E:
Criteria F:
Criteria G:
Exhibit A — 1979 Rochester Land Use Plan
Exhibit B — 1995 Olmsted County Land Use Plan
Exhibit C — Soils Map
Exhibit D — General Development Plan
General Development Plan
For Graves Property Paae
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B-1,
Item E, of the Informational Supplement to the Zoning Ordinance and Land
Development Manual, as adapted by the City of Rochester January 8, 1992, and as
amended by Ordinance in May of 1999.
A General Development Plan (GDP) is required for this site in accordance with
Section 61.211 for any site where the eventual platting of the property involves
approval of a Type III Land Subdivision permit.
This report is intended to provide a descriptive narrative of the attached GDP
prepared by Rick Harrison, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and McGhie & Betts, Inc., of
Rochester, Minnesota.
The 1979 Land Use Plan for the City of Rochester indicates that the majority of this
site lies within the 25 year Urban Service Area (See Exhibit A). The updated 1995
Olmsted County Land Use Plan also designates that the majority of this site lies
within the Urban Service Area (See Exhibit B).
In a discussion with Mr. Charles Reiter, it was concluded that a traffic analysis for
this project would not be necessary. A traffic analysis has been prepared by
Benshoof & Associates for the adjacent Weatherstone project which incorporates the
traffic volumes from the Graves site. A supplement analysis was completed for the
Ripley property (West of site) which specifically looked at the 65th Street/ Hwy 52
intersection. Refer to Section 4.2 of this report for a brief design analysis.
General Development Plan I
For Graves Prggerty Page
2.0 BACKGROUND
This site has historically been in row crop production with some pastureland. There
is no farmstead located on the site.
The applicants filed a petition for annexation of Phase I of the project, which included
approximately 54 acres in December of 1999. To date, the Cascade Town Board has
voted to not object to the annexation. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council have not acted upon the annexation at this time.
3.0 SITE ANALYSIS
3.1 Location
The property lies in the Northwest Quarterl/4 of Section 8 of Cascade
Township and is adjacent to the north property boundary of White Oaks and
North Park. 50th Avenue NW is on the easterly boundary of the site and 65th
Street NW forms the northerly boundary.
Undeveloped agricultural land lies to the east-northeast of the site.
3.2 Site Characteristics
Elevations on the site range from a high point of 1183 in the northwest corner
to elevation 1070 located in the middle of the site along its southern edge.
The site consists of rolling topography and a series of gentle ridges that drain
into a major drainage corridor in the central part of the site. This drainage
corridor consists of a linear wetland system with a man-made farm pond in
the center of the site.
3.3 Soils (See Exhibit C)
The soils and associated geological materials comprise mainly those formed
General Development Plan
For Graves Property
Paae
in loess and an underlying glacial till. The upland landscape associated with
these materials is dissected (geologically eroded) and is controlled by the
glacial till. The soils associated with the glacial till include 30 B Kenyon loam,
1 to 6 % slopes, 99 B, C & D2 Racine silt loams with a slope range of 2 to 18
%, and 295 Readlyn loam. These soils mostly occupy sideslopes and some
summit settings where the till areas outcrop or loess materials are lacking.
The soils associated with the loess include 176 Garwin silty clay loam, 203
Joy silt loam, 322C, D & E Timula silt loams, 6 to 30 % slopes, and 477 B
Littleton silt loam. Two other soils not associated with these materials include
468 Otter silt loam, occupying a wet upland drainageway area that consists
mostly of recent sediments from the eroding topsoil when the area was
farmed and 483E Waukee loam, 2 to 6 % slopes, in the lower lying alluvial
geological terrace.
All of these soils are well drained except for the Joy and Littleton that are
somewhat poorly drained; and Garwin and Otter soils that are poorly drained.
The latter two are on the official hydric soil list and have been demonstrated
to contain wetlands. Seasonal water tables occur within the upper 5 feet of
these materials and foundation drains are likely to be needed. The remaining
well -drained soils have moderate permeabilities and high available water
capacities. These well -drained soils are also very erodible when vegetation is
removed. All of these soils can adapt to a large array of vegetative systems
for residential use.
3.4 Wetlands
Four wetlands have been identified and delineated on the Arcon site, in
accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
The wetlands were marked with fluorescent pink flagging in the field and have
been surveyed by a licensed professional surveyor.
General Development Plan 4
For Graves Property Paae
Wetland A is located within the north half of the site and is associated with
drainage ways flowing down slope towards the center of the property. A pond
has been created at the southern end of Wetland A by the construction of a
very large berm. The berm was most likely constructed in conjunction with
the Soil Conservation Service in the 1970's, for purposes of controlling
erosion and sedimentation. Wetland A has a mix of vegetation communities
including wet meadow, scrub/shrub, a small forested component, shallow
marsh, and deep marsh. The wet meadow community is predominant with
saturated soil conditions so the wetland would be considered a Type 2, Wet
Meadow. Wetland A is the largest on -site wetland and is approximately 8.84
acres.
Wetland B flows from the culvert outlet of Wetland A to the south property line
were it becomes channeled. It has a mix of vegetation communities including
wet meadow, scrub/shrub and forest and is approximately 4.29 acres in size.
Wetland B is a Type 7, Wooded Swamp wetland due to the dominance of
Cottonwoods and Box elders, and the saturated and occasionally ponded soil
conditions.
Wetland C is located within the southwest portion of the project site and
continues onto the property to the south. Wetland C has a mix of wet
meadow, scrub/shrub and forested vegetation communities with soil
saturation and some areas of ponding during the growing season. Wetland C
is approximately 6.54 acres on site, and is a Type 6, Shrub Swamp wetland.
Wetland D is located within a drainage way that flows east to west into
Wetland A. Wetland D is relatively small, approximately 1.26 acres, and is a
mix of scrub/ shrub, and wet meadow. Wetland D is a Type 2, Wet Meadow
wetland.
General Develooment Plan 5
For Graves Prooerty Page
In accordance with the current proposal for the Arcon General Development
Plan, the eastern lobe of Wetland D will be impacted by the proposed road
crossing. Other potential wetland impacts include wetland crossings for
recreational paths and construction and functioning of storm water facilities.
Wetland impacts will be minimized by establishing all building lots outside the
wetlands and by locating the paths across the narrowest portions of the
wetlands. All proposed wetland impacts will be mitigated on site in
accordance with the Wetland Conservation Act and Corps of Engineers
requirements.
3.5 land Use and Zoning
The majority of the site upon annexation, will come into the City as R-1
(mixed use residential) zoned property which will permit the use of the site for
single family detached housing. A portion of the site in the northwest corner is
planned for a townhome development. When that portion is annexed into the
City the applicant would request a zone change to R-2.
3.6 Utilities
3.6.1 Sanitary Sewer
A 8" sanitary sewer is currently located on the north end of Shetland
Drive NW. This sanitary line will be extended northerly to serve the
eastern part of the Graves site. An 8" sanitary sewer is also available
on the north end of 47th Avenue NW which would serve the western
part of the site.
General Development Plan 6
For Graves Property Paae
3.6.2 Watermain
There is an existing 8" watermain located on the north end of Shetland
Drive NW. This main will be extended north to serve the eastern part
of the site. There is also a 8" watermain located at the north ends of
47th Avenue NW and White Pine Drive NW that could serve this
development.
3.6.3 Storm Sewer
No storm sewer system currently exists on the site. Surface drainage
from the north half of the site is directed to an existing farm pond. The
surface drainage on the south half of the site drains into the existing
wetland and into the storm sewer at 45th Avenue NW.
3.6.4 Access
Currently, there is no public access to the site off of 50th Avenue NW
and 65th Street NW. The GDP proposes several public roadways
throughout the site that will intersect 50th Avenue NW and 65th Street
NW, as well as ite into existing proposed streets to the south and west.
4.0 PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4.1 Project Description and Scope
The attached GDP (Exhibit D) shows conceptually the proposed street
pattern, parkland, detention basins and open space area, access to the
adjoining roadway system, and the general lot pattern.
The majority of the site will be used for single family detached housing. The
lot sizes do vary considerably in size from each other and from a typical
single family subdivision. This was done to accommodate a "coving" layout to
General Development Plan 7
For Graves Property Page
the houses. Front yard setbacks would vary so the homes could be setback
farther from the street creating a softer and more open appearance from the
street. Thirty (30) acres of the site in the northwest part of the GDP is
planned for a townhome development. There are 180 units planned for this
area for a density of 6 units/acre.
4.2 Access/Traffic Circulation
There are several public road access points into this development that will
prevent the local streets from being over capacity. There will be three (3)
vehicular access points along the south property that are existing or platted
north bound extensions of public streets in White Oaks Fourth and North Park
Ninth Subdivision: 47th Avenue NW, White Pine Drive NW, and Shetland
Drive NW. Another platted public street, 45th Avenue NW, ties into the
Graves south property line and will be terminated with a hammerhead style
turn around.
Vehicular access along the east property line would be from North Park. This
access point ties into the east/west road on the North Park GDP.
There are two (2) planned access points along 50th Avenue NW. The
southern one is aligned directly across from an access point on the Ripley
property. The alignment of this road goes across property owned by others,
so it is subject to change. The access point at 50th Avenue NW would remain
directly across from the Ripley access. The northern one is approximately
650' south of 65th Street NW. This access point is directly across from the
north property line of the Ripley property. This would be a private road that
would serve the townhome development.
General Development Plan 8
For Graves Property Paae
There are also two planned access points along 65th Street NW. The
western one is approximately 820' east of 50th Avenue NW. This is directly
across from a farm site with two driveways that form a loop drive. The
Graves access point was placed in the middle of these two driveways with the
intent that it would be flexible enough to align with a single farm drive access
point that would likely be required once 65th Street NW is upgraded. The
eastern access point along 65th Street NW is approximately 620' from the
east property line. This access point coincides with an existing farm field
driveway. Visibility and topography are not problems with either of these
access points.
4.3 Pedestrian Circulation
5' wide sidewalks are being planned for both sides of all public streets in the
development. The walks may meander along the street which would
compliment the "coving" concept of the home layouts.
A 10' wide bikepath is planned within the 50th Avenue NW right-of-way. This
right-of-way will be 60' from the center of the road. The right-of-way width of
65th Street NW is also planned to be 60' wide (from the center of the road)
but no trail is planned for that corridor at this time.
The plan also proposes a linear trail system throughout the public open
space/parkland with the central portion of the site. This trail would tie into the
50th Avenue NW trail in the northwest corner of the site. The trail also ties
into 45th Avenue NW to the south and to future developments to the east.
General Development Plan 9
For Graves Progerty Page
4.4 Storm Water Management
A continuous storm sewer system is proposed throughout the site. The
northern part of the site will drain into a detention pond that will be in the
location of the existing farm pond.
This pond will need to redesigned to accommodate this development. Two
other detention ponds are planned to handle the storm sewer run-off on the
southern part of the site. One on the west side of the wetlands and one on
the east side. Storm water detention is proposed on -site to contain the
increase in the ten-year (Q10) and 100 year (0100) on the post development
basis.
4.5 Utilities
4.5.1 Sanitary Sewer
Public sanitary sewer will be extended from the White Oaks Fourth
and North Park Ninth Subdivision to the south. There are four (4)
streets to the south that have 8" sanitary sewer existing or proposed to
the property line that could serve this site. All of the sanitary sewer is
proposed to be gravity flow. The minimum diameter of the pipe shall
be 8".
4.5.2 Watermain
This site will be served with the high level water system. The high level
system is necessary to serve access over the 1100 elevation. The
watermain will tie into the existing water tower to the east. An 8" or
10" watermain will serve the site and loop on the west side of the
development.
General Development Plan 10
For Graves Property Page
4.1.3 Storm Sewer System
As previously stated, the site will contain three detention basins to
detain the increase in runoff from the Q10 and Q100 streams. Storm
sewer pipe will be used to connect the surface runoff and direct it to
the detention basin.
Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins will be constructed.
4.1.4 Electrical service
Electrical service is currently in the territory of Peoples Cooperative
Service. It is anticipated that electrical services will be provided by
Rochester Public Utilities as the property is annexed to the City of
Rochester. Service to this site will be from the lines to service White
Oaks Fourth and North Park Ninth.
The electrical service within the subdivision will be underground.
4.1.5 Natural Gas Service
Natural Gas services will be accessed from White Oaks Fourth and
North Park Ninth.
4.2 Floodpiain
The site does not contain any regulatory flooding or 100-year flood boundary.
4.3 Parkland
The site contains an 35 acre public open space/park in the central portion of
the site. A 140' wide street frontage is shown to provide adequate access,
visibility and on street parking. Small areas of this park near the main access
could be graded level to accommodate a playground area, volleyball court or
General Development Plan > >
For Graves Prooertv Page
basketball court. As previously stated, there will be an extensive trail system
throughout the central portion of the site.
4.4 Phasing
The project will be completed in 7 phases, which are indicated on the plan.
The first phase is intended to be constructed in the summer of 2000.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, through the Minnesota Policy Act,
establishes criteria and thresholds for mandatory Environmental Assessment
Worksheets (EAW). Based on the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board's
Environmental Review Program, there is a requirement for a mandatory EAW for
phased or cumulative activities that convert 80 acres or more of agricultural land to a
more intense use.
It is our understanding that an EAW must be accepted by the City (RGU) prior to
approval of the final plat.
6.0 CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
In approving a General Development Plan, the Commission and Council will review
the plan for compliance with the criteria for approval listed in Section 61.215 which
became effective May 15, 1999. The seven (7) criteria are listed below and are
followed by our responses as to compliance:
General Development Plan 12
For Graves Property Page
Criteria A:
The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Map, or that the means for reconciling any differences have been addressed. A
GDP may be processed simultaneously with a rezoning or plan amendment request
This property lies within the boundaries of the Rochester Urban Service area per the 1979
Land Use Plan. Fifty-four acres of the south part of the site is in the process of being
annexed and will be zoned R-1. The land will be annexed into the City as the project
progresses.
Land use designation for this site would be low density residential which makes the
proposed project compatible with the land use. A zone change to R-2 will be necessary in
the future to develop the townhome area.
Criteria B:
The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation are
compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent property.
The density of the development as proposed is consistent with a low density residential land
use in the R-1 zoning district.
The proposed vehicular circulation system ties into the local street system of single family
subdivisions to the south and east. There are also two access points to this development
from both 50th Avenue NW and 65th Street NW.
Criteria C:
The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans.
General Development Plan t3
For Graves Property Page
The development is a low density residential housing project that will have a variety of
housing styles. The density and lot sizes are consistent with the Land Use and Housing
Plans.
Criteria D:
The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and streets reflected
in the City of Rochester's current 6-year Capital Improvement Program, adopted
Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation Plan, Official Maps, and any
other public facilities plans adopted by the City. Street system improvements required to
accommodate proposed land uses and projected background traffic are compatible with the
existing uses and uses shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent
properties.
Street system improvements in this area will include the upgrading of 50th Avenue NW
north of 55th Street and south of 65th Street NW to an arterial road with a 120'planned
right-of-way. .
The developers of White Oaks have already paid a substantial street contribution fee toward
the upgrading of 50th Avenue NW and the developers of Weatherstone and Ripley have
petitioned the City for improvements to 50th Avenue NW.
This is a unique situation in that most of the adjacent property owners along 50th Avenue
NW are currently interested in developing and paying their respective share of the cost to
upgrade 50th Avenue NW
It was discussed with the Weatherstone project that development along this corridor be
limited so that traffic volumes on 50th Avenue NW does not exceed 3, 000 vehicular trips per
day until it is reconstructed.
General Development Plan 14
For Graves Propertv Paae
Criteria E:
On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the development is
phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will provide access to adjoining
land in a manner that will allow development of those adjoining lands in accord with this
ordinance.
1. Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to safely
accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the existing and
proposed street system without creating safety hazards, generating auto stacking
that blocks driveways or intersections, or disrupting traffic flow on any street, as
identified in the traffic impact report, if required by Section 61.523(c). Capacity from
improvements in the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the
assessment of adequacy.
Currently, 50th Avenue NIN can handle a maximum of 3,000 vehicular trips per day.
Development along this corridor will exceed this current capacity and, therefore, 50th
Avenue NW will have to be upgraded to an arterial road. Substantial street fees will pay a
portion of this cost.
It will be necessary to phase the development along this corridor so that 50th Avenue does
not exceed 3, 000 vehicular trips per day until it is reconstructed.
2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land use, or that
the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities to serve the area of the
proposed development and such utilities are in the first three years of the City's
current 6-Year Capital Improvements Program, or that other arrangements
(contractual, development agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to
ensure that adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If
needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed development, the
General Development Plan 15
For Graves Property Pace
applicant fort he development approval shall stipulate to a condition that no
development will occur and no further development permit will be issued until
concurrency has been evidenced.
Utilities are available to serve this development. Sanitary sewer and watermain are
in place in White Oaks Fourth and North Park Ninth and will be available to serve the
Graves property.
3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the level of service
standards in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for development.
There are adequate public facilities available to the site. The public utilities, streets, and
storm water management facilities within the site shall be sized in accordance with the
standard requirements of the City.
A 35 acre public open space with a pedestrian trail is planned for the central portion of the
site. This will be of adequate size to serve the entire Graves site.
Criteria F:
The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through normal
engineering and construction practices, or that at the time of land subdivision, a more
detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to solve unusual problems that have
been identified.
The design of the storm water facilities, erosion control, and sedimentation basins will be
designed in accordance with the standard requirements of the City of Rochester.
Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted to the City for each phase of the project.
General Development Plan 16
For Graves Property Page
Criteria G:
The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for residential
development are consistent with the subdivision design standards contained in Section
64.100 and compatible with existing and planned development of adjacent parcels.
The density, lot pattern, and street layout are consistent with the standards for residential
development and are compatible with the surrounding area. Roadway connections are
planned to extend to the adjoining properties.
_7 170MN_i�
FIR
71%
I J
'
1V
McGhie Betts, kr-
(J.0 � S�
,,E Ic 4y..y, w � 1
E?s H 817- 4
L
• R'.
• Yr,
McGhie
1 W }I AK S-C
>
�oj°J5 DUi1S'fEt�
Betts, cpuNry VAS
w US r P l"PrN
p7xH,glrit?
r
lb
y f o 30B
-1846
.30B
r.: = 479.
K n47.9
all
£ i
322D
v rt. � •!
p 477B.._
36`.
322C
99C 99D2
o =$ 5 r
322C°..
9
2034''>>
�7 f VAUGI;p
��McGhiBetts,no
0felj,Yc..rrev,.. MAP
r5M51TG.
P0"C30Q gw Pxnlo"l Y
os
OX!
71 zYY' -sad
III
KI I
a
=z2z:—
i
J
`
L
i
_'�
/
• EE
K
rl
� I
I'
/
�l �,,
�'
,
�
�/' it �1�1. 11
.'•'}\'e�..�/p
.(.
. •4K r
'I
Ill
1:TF61
TO:
FROM
DATE:
RE:
City Planning and Zoning Commission
Mitzi A. Baker, Planner
February 4, 2000
KUI HE)rFR•1)!\
R\ TFD.�L�l:l5t �
POCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904.4744
ADMINISTRATION/ 507/2B5.8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADDRESSwG/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSING/HRA
507/2B5-8224
BUILDING CODE
5071285.8213
WELLISEPTIC
507/285-8345
FAX
5071257-2275
General Development Plan #147 to be known as Graves Property
Plannina Department Review;
Applicant/Owner:
Arcon Development, Inc.
7625 Metro Blvd. , Suite 350
Edina, MN 55439
Consultants:
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
1648 Third Ave. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Size and Location:
The area includes approximately 79.56 acres of land
located south of 651" St. and east of 50M Ave. NW.
Existing Land Use:
The site is presently undeveloped.
Proposed Use:
The Plan proposes townhome development in the
northwest and west central parts of the property,
single family detached development over the
remainder of the property with the exception of a
wetland/park corridor located through the site.
Land Use Plan:
This property is within the boundaries of the
Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, with
the exception of the extreme northwest comer. The
Land Use Designation for this property is "Low
Density Residential".
Zoning:
This property is currently zoned A-4 (Agricultural
Protection) in the County. Annexation has been
approved by the City for the southern 54.40 acres of
the site. Upon annexation to the City, this portion will
be zoned R•1 (Mixed Single Family) district.
Streets:
The Plan proposes one private road access to 50"
Ave. NW and allows for the possibility of a future
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITYIAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
public road connection to 501". Two public road
accesses are provided to 55" St. NW. The
development will also have access to the east, to
North Park, and to the south, connecting with White
Oaks Fourth and North Park Ninth Subdivisions.
Both public and private roads are proposed within the
GDP.
Sidewalks: Sidewalk will be required along both sides of all public
roadways. A 10' path will be required along the east
side of 50" Ave. and also along the south side of 65'h
St. NW. The Developer is also proposing a
pedestrian trail system through the Wetland/Open
space corridor.
Drainage: The General Development Plan identifies existing
topography. The property generally drains to the
central and southern portions of the site through an
existing corridor. An existing pond is proposed to be
used as a detention pond near the center of this
development. Two additional ponds are proposed
within the southern portion of the Wetland/open
space corridor, outside of the Wetlands.
Use of the existing farm pond for detention will
require further review.
Detailed grading and drainage plans wiii be required
when the property is platted.
Wetlands: Minnesota Statutes now require that all developments
be reviewed for the presence of wetlands or hydric
soils. According to the Soils Survey, hydric soils exist
on this property. The GDP shows wetland areas. A
delineation has been completed for the property.
Replacement will be required for any Wetland filling.
Public Utilities: Water and sewer can be extended from the White
Oaks and North Park developments to the south,
where the first phases of development will begin from.
Parkland Dedication: Parkland dedication requirements for this
development should be met though a combination of
cash and land.
Environmental Review: In accordance with the Minnesota Rules. 4410.4300
subp. 36, the proposed development of this property
would require preparation of a Mandatory
Environmental Assessment Worksheet since it
consists of the conversion of 80 or more acres of
agricultural land to a more intensive land use, i.e.
residential development.
Referral Comments: 1. Planning Dept. Transportation Div. (see attached)
2. Rochester Public Works (see attached)
IL01-
/� O^ Page 3
n General Development Pian
February 4, 2000
3. John Harford, Planning Dept. & Wetlands RGU
(see attached)
4. Rochester Park & Recreation (see attached)
5. RPU Water Division (see attached)
6. Olmsted County SWCD (see attached)
7. Rochester Fire Dept. (see attached)
Report Attachments: 1. Reduced Copy of General Development Plan
Map
2. Area Map
3. Referral Comments (7)
4. Proposed General Development Plan Narrative
Summary:
This GDP includes approximately 60 acres of land for low density residential development. The
portion of the property shown for townhome development will need to be re -zoned in the future to
allow for that style of dwellings. The R-1x and R-2 zoning districts would accommodate
townhome development and both are consistent with the "low density residential" land use
designation for the property. Private roads are proposed to serve the townhome development
while public roads are proposed to serve the detached single family portion of the development.
Phasing will begin from the south, with connections to White Oaks and North Park. The northern
portion of the site is proposed to be completed last.
Wetlands are located within corridors through the site. The GOP shows avoidance of most of the
Wetlands and maintaining them within an open spacelpark corridor. Stormwater drainage is
proposed to be handled within the open space/park corridor. The MPCA and CORP of Engineers
may have concerns with using the existing pond for stormwater detention. Use of the existing
pond and any alterations that may be necessary to utilize the facility will need to be reviewed with
the MPCA and CORP. The Consultant or Applicant will need to contact these agencies.
A trail system is proposed within the open space/park corridor that may be eligible for some
Parkland Dedication credits. A 10' trail system will be required along the east side of 50' Ave.
NW and also along the south side of 650, St. NW. The GDP will need to be revised to identify
these trails.
Staff Suggested Findings and Recommendation:
Paragraph 61.215 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual lists the
criteria for approval of a general development plan (see attached section from the newly adopted
regulations, which became affective May 15, 1999.
Criteria A. The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and zoning map, or that the means for reconciling any differences have
been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously with a rezoning or
plan amendment request.
This GDP proposes low density residential development, which is consistent with
the land use designation for the property. The portion of the property identified
for townhome development will need to be zoned R-1X or R-2 in the future in
order to allow for townhomes. At the time of Platting, lot lines will need to be
reviewed further for compliance with the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land
Page 4 '263/-
General Development Pian
February 4, 2000
Development Manual. It appears as though some Jots may not meet the
minimum width at the building fine (60' wide, at the 25'setback line).
A 10' trail system will be required along the east side of 5d" Ave. NW and also
along the south side of 65" St. NW The GDP will need to be revised to identify
these trails. The trail shown within the Wetland/open space corridor will need to
be 10' wide instead of the 8'shown.
Criteria B. The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation
are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent
property.
This GDP proposes low density residential development, which is consistent with
the land use designation for the property. The portion of the property identified
for townhome development will need to be zoned R-1X or R-2 in the future in
order to allow for townhomes. At the time of Platting, lot boundaries will need to
be reviewed further for compliance with the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and
Land Development Manual. it appears as though some lots may not meet the
minimum width at the building line (60' wide, at the 25' setback line).
Criteria C. The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans
The development density is consistent with a Low Density Residential land use
designation of the Land Use Plan. The GDP promotes the development of mixed
densities and styles. Additionally, the GDP is consistent with the Housing Plan
and the standards for the physical and social environments of residential
neighborhoods.
Criteria D. The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and
streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6-Year Capital Improvement
Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation
Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City.
Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and
projected background traffic are compatible with the existing uses and uses
shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties.
Street system improvement within this immediate area which may be needed to
accommodate the proposed land uses and projected background traffic include
upgrading 5e Ave. NW, north of 55" St., to a collector or arterial. Funding for
this project will need to be determined. The City is exploring options for funding
the improvements, since they are not reflected in the current 6-year CIP or other
plans. It will be necessary to limit development along the corridor so that traffic
volumes on 50v' Ave. do not exceed approximately 3,000 vehicles per day until
the roadway is reconstructed. Phasing this project to begin from the south and
southeast will help reduce impact to 50Y'Ave. during the interim.
On the Long Range Bicycle Plan both 500 Ave. and 6e St are identified as
corridors requiring development of Neighborhood Connector Trails. The GDP will
need to be revised to identify a pedestrian trail along both 5d" Ave. NW and 65"
St. NW.
Criteria E. On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the
development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will
aN Page 5 i
General Development Pian
February 4, 2000
provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those
adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance.
Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to
safely accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the
existing and proposed street system without creating safety hazards,
generating auto stacking that blocks driveways or intersections, or
disrupting traffic flow on any street, as identified in the traffic impact
report, if required by Section 61.523(C). Capacity from improvements in
the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the assessment of
adequacy.
It will be necessary to limit (phase) development within the 5d" Ave. NW corridor,
so that traffic volumes on 500 Ave. do not exceed 3,000 vehicles per day until it is
reconstructed.
Traffic from the units lying to the east'south of the wetland and drainage way will
primarily travel to the east and south through North Park to access 55" St. NW.
This portion of the development should be required to contribute S40 per dwelling
unit toward a fund that will be dedicated to implementing the North Park
neighborhood traffic management plan.
2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land
use, or that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities
to serve the area of the proposed development and such utilities are in
the first three years of the City s current 6-Year Capital Improvements
Program, or that other arrangements (contractual, development
agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to ensure that
adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If
needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed
development, the applicant for the development approval shall stipulate
to a condition that no development will occur and no further development
permit will be issued until concurrency has been evidenced.
Water and sewer will be extended from White Oaks and North Park to serve the
first few phases of development and will be extended through the site as the
property develops.
3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the level of
service standards in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for
development.
Development of property along the 500 Ave. corridor will need to be limited so
that traffic volumes do not exceed 3,000 vehicles per day before the roadway is
improvedheconstructed.
The GDP proposes three storm water detention ponds within the public open
space and Wetlands corridor. The location, size and design of these facilities will
require further review.
Detailed construction plans will need to be approved for all infrastructure
improvements. The pedestrian path located within the public open space and
Wetlands corridor will need to be 10' instead of the 8' shown. A 10' path is also
required along the entire west boundary of the property, adjacent to 5d" Ave. NW
Page 6
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
a0s -
and will likely be required along the entire north property boundary. The GDP will
need to be revised to identify these pedestrian facilities.
Criteria F The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices, or that, at the time of land
subdivision, a more detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to
solve unusual problems that have been identified.
The GDP proposes three storm water detention ponds within the public open
space and Wetlands corridor. The location, size and design of these facilities will
require further review.
Criteria G. The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for
residential development are consistent with the subdivision design standards
contained in Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned
development of adjacent parcels.
At the time of Platting, lot lines will need to be reviewed further for compliance
with the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. It appears
as though some lots may not meet the minimum width at the building line (60'
wide, at the 25'setback line).
Proposed roadways provide connections to adjacent properties and allow for
continued growth and development of those properties. The southern portion of
the GDP provides for planned connections to the North Park and White Oaks
developments. The proposed densities are compatible with existing and planned
development of adjacent parcels.
Recommendation:
At this time, staff suggests that the following conditions should be imposed in order to assure
compliance with the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual:
1. Approval of this GDP is contingent upon 50"Ave., north of 55"t St NW, being
upgraded to a Collector or Arterial standard.
Z Storm water management must be provided for this development Any ponds serving
50 developable acres or less will remain private, and execution of long term
maintenance and ownership agreements will be required. All required private
stormwater facilities must be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of
development
3. The property shall be platted. When platted, controlled access shall be provided along
the entire length of 50m Ave. NW and 650 St NW, with the exception of the one private
road access and two public road accesses as shown on the GDP. When platted,
controlled access will also be required within 50 feet from the intersections of any
roads with 50'4 Ave. NW or 65'" St NW, for private driveways. In addition, 60 feet of
right-ol--way shall be dedicated for both 50'" Ave. NW and 65"' St NW.
4. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required along 50'" Ave. NW and 65`" St NW.
�/ 6 Page 7
f� `� General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
5. Traffic from the units lying to the east/south of the wetland and drainage way will
primarily travel to the east and south through North Park to access 55'" St. NW. This
portion of the development shall contribute $40 per dwelling unit toward a fund that
will be dedicated to implementing the North Park neighborhood traffic management
plan.
6. The development shall be phased so that traffic volumes on 50'" Ave. NW, north of 550
St. NW, do not exceed approximately 3,000 average daily trips until it is reconstructed.
A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 50tb Ave. NW, and 6e St. NW.
Current City policy for substandard streets would require a contribution of $30 per foot
of frontage along both roadways. The City is currently considering a Traffic
Improvement District (TID) for this area. If a T1D is adopted, development of this
property may be subject to additional charges.
7. A Wetland replacement plan will be required for any Wetland rifling. Any necessary
permits for said activity shaft be secured prior to Plat approval. in addition, the
applicant or consultant shall consult the MPCA and Army CORPS of Engineers
regarding the use of the existing farm pond for storm water management as part of this
development. if use of this facility is not approved by said agencies, the GDP will
need to be revised to identify alternate area for storm water detention.
8. Park dedication requirement shall be met through a combination of land and cash. The
grading plan for this property will need to include grading two moderately sloped areas
for locating neighborhood play equipment and turf play fields, per the specifications of
the Park & Recreation Department.
9. The applicant shag enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Rochester that
outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to; storm water
management; park dedication; traffic improvements; pedestrian facilities;
contributions for public infrastructure, including contribution obligations toward traffic
improvements in the area attributable to this project; long term maintenance and
ownership of landscape islands shown on the GDP within the cul-de-sacs.
10. The 30' access easement shown in Phase i shall be part of the Oudot for the park/open
space area and not an easement.
11. A revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department reflecting all required
modifications, including identifying pedestrian trails along the east side of 50'" Ave.
NW and the south side of 650 St. NW and widening the trail through the Wetland/open
space corridor to 10 feet.
NOTE:
At the time of platting, temporary tum-a-rounds may be required.
The GDP narrative indicates that sidewalks are proposed to meander through the
development. If sidewalk locations are proposed outside of the public right-of-way,
additional easements will be required.
VA
ROCHESTER PARK AND F :REATION DEPARTMENT
00700)
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 23, 2000
TO: Larry Frank
Arcon Development
7625 Metro Boulevard
Suite 350
Edina, Minnesota 55439
FROM: Denny Stolz
SUBJECT: Hypointe GDP / Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
The attached minutes from the February 9, 2000 Planning Commission hearing on the
Hypointe GDP contain a couple of items that I believe I need to respond to.
The Park Department agreed to maintain the turf on the cut de sac if a 30' access to
the public land located west of the cut de sac were provided. The GDP includes this
access.
The Park Department does not recommend having a "tot lot" developed in the cut de
sac area. There will be traditional neighborhood park development occurring in the public
corridor west of the cut de sac. There is no reason to have an additional playground area
in the middle of this street.
The Park Department has agreed to maintain a turf area in the cut de sac. The area
is large enough to accommodate a few shade trees and perhaps even conifer trees. The
Park Department is not recommending extensive landscaping of the area with gravel mulch
and plants. This type of landscape requires more maintenance that we can commit to the
project.
I'd like to commend you and Andy for the innovative layout of a very difficult piece of
land. I appreciate your efforts to solicit our input before you went to final design
Please contact me at 5-7-281-6164 if you have questions. Thank you.
Copies faxed to:
Andy Masterpcle, McGhie & Betts
Mitzi Baker, Planning
-. iin LcU-JwIJ
0
OLMSTED SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
MINNESOTA I _
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
February 2.1, 2000
Olmsted County Planning
Attention: Suzanne Lapalm
2122 Campus Drive Sr.
Rochester, MN 55904
Attention: Suzanne I,apalm
DISTRICTS
1485 Inducmai Drive NW
Room 102
Rochaaler, Mlnneson 5590,
(507) 280.2850
Re: #00-26 by Arcon Development Inc. known as Nypointe
Refer to GDP #147 known as the Graves property dated January 21, 2000 for comments.
With adjacent hydric and floodplain soils erosion control measures must be installed to control
runoff that may impact the wetland.
If you have any questions plcase call 280-2850.
Sincerely,
I.arry ABrg
District Technician
cc; David Kramer, Rochester Public Works
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
rpu
we pr'zz�e, ,ve aetbrer
February 22, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904-7996
01
REFERENCE: Type III, Phase II, Preliminary Plat #00-06 by Arcon Development, Inc. to be
known as Hypointe.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced preliminary plat is complete and our comments follow:
1. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments.
The Land Development Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department
determines the applicability of these fees.
2. Minor revisions to the proposed water system layout are required. We will provide these
comments to the applicant's engineering firm.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,rs. o.- -O -
."44A
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention Bureau
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
Arcon Development, Inc.
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542
aio
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT, TRANSPORTATION DIVISION
GDP 147 The transportation issues associated with the proposed development have
Arcon for the most part been identified in the development of other properties in
the area and are issues that are under study by the city in cooperation with
the developers. These include:
> The need to upgrade 50'" Ave. and 651b St. to accommodate collector!
arterial type of traffic levels, which requires the dedication of land to
provide for the needed future right of way, and to evaluate the
locationispacing of access paints to limit the level of traffic conflict on
these corridors.
> Financing the upgrade of these corridors through some type of cost
sharing program involving the private sector and public sector
> Providing accommodations for transportation needs other than auto
and truck traffic; this includes accommodations for non -motorized
traffic and transit.
> Addressing the issue of neighborhood traffic management.
In response to these issues we would make the following comments and
recommendations:
> The development plan is making provisions for the needed right of way
along 50`" Ave. and 651" St. — 60 feet of right of way should be
provided towards the 120' right of way that is anticipated to be needed
for development of a collector street corridor
> Financing issues are a matter that is under study. Among the concepts
being looked at is the ability to use Tax Increment Funding from a
portion of the Weatherstone development, adjustments to the
substandard street fee, and city seeking federal and/or state funds to
support the upgrading. Until these issues are resolved, traffic volumes
on 50" Ave. should be limited to approximately 3000 vehicles per day,
which is the capacity standard for a major local street. Other
alternatives available for this development are phasing the
development such that the traffic added to 50" Ave. is limited in the
short time while the reconstruction issues are dealt with. One option
would be phasing the project in beginning in the SE area of the
property.
➢ On the Long Range Bicycle Plan both 50'" Ave. and 65'" St. are
identified as corridors requiring development of Neighborhood
Connector Trails. These are trails providing connections from
neighborhood areas to the regional trail system (such as the Douglas
Trail or trails along Circle Drive) as well as providing connections to
schools, community parks (such as Essex Park), and other non -
neighborhood destinations. Along 50"' Ave. the trail has been identified
for development on the east side of the corridor; along 651° St. the
immediacy of residential development on the south side of the corridor
suggests the trail should be on that side of the corridor. As grading
and improvement plans are prepared for this development
consideration will need to be given to fitting in a trail facility along the
south side of 651" St.
CUr/11
In the recent review of the North Park 10tn Subdivision the current
status of the North Park neighborhood traffic management plan was
discussed and it was recommended that a contribution be made on a
per lot basis for future improvements associated with implementing
that plan. The recommended fee is $40 per dwelling unit, which is to
go into a separate fund that will be dedicated to implementing the plan.
In the proposed plan, staff would recommend that this fee be applied
towards those housing units lying to the east I south of the wetland
and drainageway bisecting the site, since the traffic from this area will
primarily travel to the east and south through North Park to access 55'h
St. and West Circle Drive. The traffic impact along Fairway Drive and
441" Ave. in North Park from the remainder of the development area
should be incidental in nature and thus application of the fee to those
areas is not recommended.
a�� ROCHESTER
Minnesota
I /31/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4' Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281.6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for General Development
Plan #147.on the Arcon Development (Graves) property. The following are Public
Works comments on the proposal:
Storm Water Management must be addressed for this development. On -site
detention is shown on the proposed GDP plan, using three detention ponds.
Any on -site storrnwater facilities serving 50 developable acres or less will
remain private, and execution of a long term maintenance & ownership
agreement will be required. All required private stormwater facilities must be
constructed concurrent with the initial stages of development.
2. Controlled access must be provided along the entire length of 500 Ave NW
and 65" ST NW, with the exception of the street access/accesses that are
approved through the GOP. Controlled access will be required within 50 feet
from the intersections of any new road(s) with 50'" Ave NW, or 65" St NW, for
private driveways.
3. A temporary turn around will be required at the westerly end of this property,
for the future through street to 500 Ave NW, in Phase III.
4. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required along 50"i Ave NW, and 650 St
NW.
5. Dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way will be required, as shown, for 50'" Ave
NW. Dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way will also be required along the
south side of 65^ St NW (Note: GOP Report, prepared by the Owner's
engineer, indicates 60 feet of dedication but the GDP plan appears to show
only 50 feet of ROW).
C:%TEMP%GDP147.doc
t20CHESTrR
Minnesota
1 /31 /00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur, ,
ar3
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4' Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
6. Pedestrian facilities will be required along both sides of all new public roads,
and along all the east side of 50'" Ave NW and the south side of 65" St NW.
A 10 foot bituminous bike path will be required along the east side of 50'"Ave
NW, and may also be required along the south side of 65" St NW.
7. The GDP narrative indicates that sidewalks are proposed to meander through
the development. If sidewalk location is proposed outside of the public ROW,
additional easements will be required.
8. Easements will be required for all off -site utilities.
9. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 5V Ave NW, and 65' St
NW. Current City policy for substandard streets would require a contribution
of $30.00 per foot of frontage along both roadways. The City is currently
considering a Traffic Improvement District for this area. If a TID is adopted,
development of this property may be subject to addition charges
10. A long term maintenance and ownership agreement will be required for the
landscape islands that are indicated on the GDP plan within the cul-de-sacs.
11. Specific routing of sanitary sewer lines will be reviewed further during the
platting stages.
12. Execution of a City / Owner Contract will be required prior to construction of
public infrastructure.
13. In Phase I, the 30 foot access easement must be part of the Outlot and not
an easement.
14. The pedestrian trail shall be 10 feet wide and not 8 feet as shown.
C;%TEMRG0P147.doc
a14 ROCHESTr;R
Minnesota
131/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 40 Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507.287.7800
FAX — 507.281-6216
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property (rates are
subject to annual review and change):
J9173 "Trunk Sanitary Sewer in 5V St NW Area" @ $392.54 per acre plus 7.5%
interest from May 16, 1994 (based on current policy).
J9377 "Trunkline Sanitary Sewer Extension to White Oaks" @ $152.26 per acre
plus 7.5% interest from September 16, 1996 (based on current policy).
J9265 "Watertower to Serve High Level District in NW Area" @ $1,154.67 per
acre plus 7.5% interest from April 15, 1996 (based on current policy).
Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division.
Storm Water Management Fee (if on -site detention is not provided).
S A proportional share of the cost of reconstructing 50'" Ave NW & 65" St NW.
CATEMPNGDP147.doc
ROCHESTER PARK ANC .ZECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM ��.„t(
DATE: January 24, 2000
TO: Suzanne LaPalm
Planning Department
SUBJECT: Graves Property General Development Plan # 147
The development will have a dedication requirement of approximately 10 acres.
Dedication should be in the form of a combination of land and cash in lieu of land.
The applicant should receive dedication credits for constructing and grading the interior
trail system.
None of the designated wetland areas qualify for parkland dedication credit.
The grading plan for the open space / park areas located NE and SE of the existing
farm pond should show two moderately sloped areas for locating neighborhood play
equipment and turf play fields. These areas, once graded, would qualify for parkland
dedication credit.
:I4:\PARK\DSTOTZ\2000\DEDICATION\NW 2898\GRAVES GDP.DOC
aW*rpu
;ue n:eaje, Ne deewer
January 24, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: General Development Plan #147 by Arcon Development, Inc. to be known as
the Graves Property GDP.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced general development plan is complete and our comments follow:
I. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments.
The Land Development Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department
determines the applicability of these fees.
L The water system in this area will need to be looped wherever possible including the cul-de-
sacs to create a network capable of providing adequate fire flows and water quality.
Extensions will also need to be made per our standard policy to provide service to adjoining
properties. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary
water system layout to serve this area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly (. yours,P- %�
C6.41X 1��+''�--
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
Arcon Development, Inc.
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542
McGhie - Betts, inc.
Consulting Engineers ' Land Surveyors
Planners
1648 Third Avenue S.E., Rochester, MN 55904 507-289-3919 Fax 507-289-7333
1604 Riverview Lane, Northfield, MN 55057 507.645-0964 Fax 507-645.2842
February 2, 2000
Mr. Brent Svenby
Consolidated Planning & Zoning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
RE: Graves Property
Dear Mr. Svenby:
all
In accordance with Section 60.605 (B) of the amended zoning ordinance, we are submitting,
on behalf of the applicant, Arcon Development, a copy of the minutes of the Neighborhood
Informational Meeting which was held on January 31, 2000, 6:30 P.M. at the Calvary
Evangelical Free Church, in Rochester, Minnesota.
An attendance list is also enclosed for your reference.
It is noted that the minutes generally document the discussion, comments and questions.
However, because of the nature of this project, we have attempted to document all of the
questions and comments of the attendees.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
r
Andrew J. Masterpole, ASLA
AJM/bed
Attachment
pc Mr. Larry Frank'
k. M. McGhie, PE. US. 1904-1975 William E. Tomlon, CET. President James E. Swanson. US. Vice President David L. Morrill, PE. Vice President
Douglas N. Bens, PE. LS, Vice President Andrew J. Masterpole. ASLA Larry J. Shannon. LS Michael E. Gown. PE. US
Mark E. Severtson. US Daniel J. Zemke, PE Gregory R. Bond. PE
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Minutes of the Neighborhood informational meeting
for
Graves Property
in
Section 6 of Cascade Township, Rochester, Minnesota
am
January 31, 2000, 6:30 P.M., at Calvary Evangelical Free Church
In Attendance: See attached attendance list.
Purpose: The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the proposed project to the
neighborhood and to answer questions and document concerns or issues that may need
further investigation or consideration.
General Discussion:
Mr. Andy Masterpole of McGhie & Betts, Inc., and Larry Graves of Arcon Development,
made a brief presentation on the proposed project.
The presenters explained the types of housing; density; public parkland space and trail
system; storm water management; vehicular and pedestrian circulation; phasing; and sale
price ranges of the lots and homes.
The development process was also reviewed and it was noted that the developer has made
an application for a general development plan. Specific plats and plans will be completed on
a phase by phase basis and submitted to the City for review and approval.
Attendees were informed that public hearings are scheduled at the Planning and Zoning
Commission on February 9, 2000, and at the Common Council on March 6, 2000. It was
noted that the City Planning and Zoning Staff and City Clerk would be responsible to notify
the affected neighbors of these meetings in accordance with the Land Development Manual
and Zoning Ordinance.
Questions/Comments by Attendees
Question 1. How fast do you see the different phases getting developed?
Answer 1: Arcon Development would like the project to be completed in 4 to 5 years. It all
depends on the market.
Question 2: Would you sell the individual townhouses or would the entire townhouse parcel
be sold?
Answer 2: Arcon Development did not know for sure.
Question 3: Have you contacted any townhouse builders?
Answer 3: Arcon has not contacted any local builders, but he has had some discussions
with Twin Cities builders.
Question 4: Why townhouses and not more single-family in the area designated for
townhouse development?
Answer 4: it was explained that because of the topography and space limitations that
townhouses were a better fit than single family.
Question 5: Why is there a 120' right of way indicated for 50th Avenue NW?
Answer 5: The City Public Works Department required that because of the plans to
upgrade 500 Avenue NW to an collector or aertiai roadway.
Question 6: What is the time frame for the re -construction of 501h Avenue NW?
Answer 6: It was estimated that the re -construction would occur in 2001 or 2002.
Question 7: Where would the construction traffic go?
Answer 7: Initially, the construction traffic would go through North Park on Shetland Drive.
After development progresses, traffic could also come off of 5(f Avenue NW
and 650 Street NW.
Question 8: Is there a parking lot planned for the park?
Answer 8: No, the Park Department has reviewed the plan and does not want to put in a
parking lot. Street parking would be available.
Question 9: What will the price of the homes be?
Answer 9: $130,000 range for the southern lots and $150,000 - $170,000 range for the
northern lots.
There were some comments on how nice the views of the City were from the property. Also,
comments were made that the parkland/open space area was a positive amenity.
ATTENDANCE ROLL
BORHOOD INFORMATION M
GRAVES PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
u
IA K11 IA ov'2,t onnn AT r-lA P M AT CAI VAPV FVANr PI ICAI POPP C4d111 r W
_.. - .... -----... _.__ ...-.....--- --- -- - ---- - - ---..-.----
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NO./FAX NO.
1 4n F^�k
1
6.3s, - iz9 f3/
2. i3f LL bSw fi LD
57 19 (.)4NC_46T61Q PL NW
2 8 c 4
Nvnr_!(N3oQ5 gSSoC
e0"•CSTE SSyor
3. Loj-,,v f mod/
(a222 5� A-vt fjw
Zap-ygoS �'„y-i3y�
I�a�'1
QA w,.sa,..r
4.
�fJrrd �CG�Ilcc
�(c 6gyarr �'C!'7Y
%-84 -3q(y
pL JG;TL
qq/L C�p�.r;14C�C�..w
ZPo_DS%3
N•lsJ N.E;CW6- 3 Ms.�
7
s.
(C ��t` T
34, c4•-, /I-.« vr-t 44-r�<
3-77 r07,
9.
�-
d
10.
?�9-39/7
1,.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Page 1:
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Heartne Date: February 9. 2000
private driveways will be required within 50 feet from the
road(s) with the 55' St. NW right-of-way. 14
3. Right andlor left turn lanes will be required from
4. contribution will be required for recons
fit substandard streets would require a c
TrVic Improvement District (TID) is adop
prolkerty may be subject to additional cha
WAY14
of any new
fof 55'" St. NW. Current City policy
Lion of $30 per foot of frontage. if a
55" St. NW, development of this
5. At the\dication
ing, easements will required for off -site utilities.
6. Parklaon for this deveio ent shall be satisfied by cash in lieu of land.
7. Areasils are shown the GDP which must be reviewed further to
deterr wetlands ex t. Staff will need to conduct an on -site review in the
springboundari or lack of wetlands. No grading or filling of these
areas p to ob ining "no -loss" or replacement approval from the LGU.
8. Due to the block /en
be provided, except
make the pedestrian
t development, mid -block pedestrian connections shall
City Engineer determines topographic conditions
Ms. Schultze moved to a rove the stantial Land Alteration, and expressed
appreciation that inform tion on the c and fill sections was provided. She stated that
in the future, an aerial oto of the area be filled would be appreciated. Mr. Staver
seconded the motion. he motion carrie -0.
The Chair called a
and reconvened the melting after 10 minutes.
General Development Plan #147 by Arcon Development Inc to be known as the Graves
detached housing and townhomes. The development would be served with new public
Ms. Baker presented the staff report, dated February 4, 2000, to the Commission. The staff
report is on file at the Rochester —Olmsted Planning Department.
Ms. Baker presented and explained a map of the proposed GDP. She reviewed access,
wetlands, parkland, and phasing. She pointed out that the initial portion of the development
won't have access to 50'" Avenue NW. Ms. Baker referred to the staff -suggested findings and
conditions, noting approval is recommended subject to the 11 conditions. She referred to the
first condition, and noted it also applied to other developments on the west side of 50" Avenue
that didn't have the opportunity of taking access through existing subdivisions. Because there
are other conditions listed that limit the number of trips to 50'h Avenue until it is reconstructed,
Q\�e :6
City Plannmg and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearmg Date: February 9, 2000
staff would be comfortable deleting condition number 1. She also suggested rewording a
portion of condition number 3 to state, 'The property shall be platted. When platted, controlled
access shall be provided along the entire length of 50" Avenue NW and 651` Street NW, except
for the one private road access, one public road access, and one future public road access."
She noted the remainder of the condition will remain as is.
Mr. Quinn asked if there will be specific language in the Development Agreement that will
describe specifically which units will be required to pay the $40 per dwelling unit fee for traffic
management.
Mr. Reiter clarified that none of the units west of the drainageway are recommended to be
included.
Mr. Werven asked if ail of this property is still in the County.
Ms. Baker answered yes. She explained that the City frequently reviews GDPs for property not
fully annexed into the City. The applicants have petitioned for annexation of 52 acres and that
Is where they will start their platting. She pointed out that all except for the north/northwest
corner is in the 25-year urban service area.
Ms. Schultze commented on the number of cul-de-sacs, and asked if one of the roads could be
looped to eliminate two cul-de-sacs.
Ms. Baker stated that as far as she understands, the Subdivision Regulations don't require
connecting roadways even if topography allows. She pointed out that the City has expressed
an interest in reducing cul-de-sacs because of some maintenance and connectivity issues, and
she noted that there are no regulations that address coving.
Representing the applicant, Andy Masterpole, McGhie & Betts, Inc., addressed the
Commission. He stated that Larry Frank of Arcon Development is also in attendance. Mr.
Masterpole explained that the GDP consists of 144 acres, and will be called Hypointe, which
reflects the topography. He noted that 52 acres is currently in the process of annexation and
the property will be developed with single-family homes and townhomes, with the a density of
2.9 units per acre for the single family homes and 6 units per acres for the townhomes. He
explained that caving is a different approach to development that allows deeper and more
varied setbacks, with the garages possibly being side -loaded and the sidewalks may meander,
which would require an easement if they are outside the public right-of-way. Mr. Masterpole
noted that the area planned for townhomes will need to be rezoned to either the R-1 x or R-2
zoning district, and townhomes were chosen for this area because they will work better with the
topography than single-family homes. He explained that the roads in this portion of the
development will be private and will have one access point to 50"' Avenue NW, with the layout
being as such to avoid the wetlands. Mr. Masterpole stated that the public open space corridor
will have a trail system through it, and they have been working with the Park & Recreation
Department to create some play areas. He reviewed the access locations to the GDP, and
noted the first phase will begin in the southeast comer, with construction to begin mid -summer
of 2000. Mr. Masterpole commented that they are in agreement with the conditions, and they
held a neighborhood meeting on January 31 with 10 neighbors in attendance. He addressed
the issue of the number of cul-de-sacs, and explained that he isn't sure the topography would
allow the looping to occur, and he pointed out that cul-de-sac lots are very desirable.
Page i i aa3 City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
Ms. Schultze requested that the issue of the number of cul-de-sacs be looked at very carefully.
Ms. McGowan asked if the name of the GDP would be in conflict with Highpcint Condominiums.
Ms. Baker stated the name will be reviewed to verify that it doesn't conflict with any existing
developments.
Ms. Schultze asked if the turn-arounds with the central green areas have been discussed with
the Park & Recreation Department.
Mr. Masterpole explained that if he has discussed this with Mr. Stott and was told that if the
City has access to drive a vehicle through, they will maintain the open space on the cul-de-
sacs.
Larry Frank, Project Manager for Arcon Development, addressed the Commission. He
explained that topography is an issue in the northeast area, resulting in the cul-de-sac. He
stated they will look at the one in the south closer. He noted they will be building a tot -lot in one
of the cul-de-sac islands, which is 80' across, and the Park Department will maintain it as long
is there is a pathway connection. Mr. Frank explained that Arcon Development is a land
developer out of the Twin Cities that does not build homes, but simply develops the land,
providing a product for local builders, but they maintain architectural control and approve all
house plans. He noted that the mail boxes are located in central areas with attached
newspaper boxes, making for a cleaner streetscape. He also pointed out that they have
requirements for the number of trees that must be planted per lot. Mr. Frank commented that if
the GDP name is in conflict with another development, they will change it. He stated they have
no problems with the conditions and explained that the townhouses will be one-story with
basements, starting in the $140,000 range, and they have beautiful views. Mr. Frank pointed
out the two parcels on the west where they have a conceptual road to tie in with another
development if they acquire these parcels. He stated they have been in discussions with the
owner of the 12 acre parcel.
Ms. McGowan commented that she is in agreement with the south cul-de-sac and stated she
lives on one with the 80' green space, and it works out fine for snowplowing.
Mr. Frank noted they stay away from grass on these cul-de-sacs, but they would do some sort
of gravel mulch with landscaping.
Mr. Brede asked the total number of units in the development.
It was clarified that there will be 236 single-family homes and 180 townhomes.
Chris Granrud, 6320 50'" Avenue NW, addressed the Commission. He feels that condition
number 1 should not be deleted.
Ms. McGowan pointed out that condition number 6 contains the same requirement, so that is
why number 1 was deleted.
Paee iS
try Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Heanng Date: February 9, 1000
Mr. Granrud asked if the 501" Avenue improvements need to be approved before this
development is approved.
Mr. Reiter explained that the issue is one of timing, and that it is recognized that the road needs
to be upgraded and Public Works, City Finance, City Attorney, and City Administration are all
working on a method to finance the improvements, which will include a combination of public
financing and developer contribution. He stated that Public Works has already begun to work
on the design of the road, but until the road is upgraded, there is a limit of 3000 trips per day,
which equates to approximately 300 housing units using 50'" Avenue. There is a similar
condition applied to 65" Street NW until that is upgraded. Mr. Reiter commented that the
efforts to make the improvements are all moving forward.
Mr. Granrud asked if the frontage for the new road will be incurred by the property owners.
Mr. Reiter explained that there is a substandard street fee that will be charged at the time of
development of the land. The existing property owners will not have to pay the fee if they are
not changing the use of their property, but if the use of the land changes, they will be subject to
the sub -standard street fee.
Mr. Granrud stated that the 60' right-of-way will come into his front yard and almost up to his
septic system. He noted that some people have purchased land based upon the 25-year plan
for this piece of land that didn't include it being developed, and now, only 2 years later, it will be
developed. Mr. Granrud commented that his property value will decrease significantly.
Mr. Reiter explained that at the time the project moves forward to reconstruct 50w Avenue, the
City will be involved in the property acquisition process and make him an offer on acquiring the
needed right-of-way.
Mr. Granrud stated he doesn't want 5V Avenue upgraded, especially at his cost.
Lori Maidl, 6222 50`" Avenue NW, addressed the Commission. She asked if they do not sell
right-cf-way, what happens to that part of the trail.
Mr. Reiter explained that when the project to upgrade 50' Avenue occurs, the City will
approach her and the owner of the 12 acre piece to acquire the necessary right-of-way, and
whatever right-of-way is acquired will be adequate for the trail.
Mr. Quinn stated the developer would only do the trail on the land they own and the City would
get involved for the rest.
Ms. Maidl stated they haven't seen the plan on the other side of the road, and asked where the
roads will meet on both sides of 50'" Avenue. She would like the portion of the road on the east
side of 50'hAvenue moved to the south so that their house will not be so close to it.
Mr. Masterpole pointed out the wetland that may not allow the roads to connect as Ms. Maid[
suggested. A question should be asked if the connection could be moved south to give them
more room.
Mr. Reiter stated they are open to looking at it, but one of their concems is spacing.
i
Pace 19
a0%
City Planning and Zoning Comtntssion Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
Ms. Schultze asked how the review process is set up in terms of conceptual roadway
connections through property not owned by the developer.
Mr. Reiter explained that in this case, where they are dealing with properties on both sides of
the road, staff looks at the future nature of the roadway and what the expected traffic levels will
be, and they determine what are the appropriate number of access points and whether direct
access to lots should be allowed. There typically are logical places to put the accesses and to
combine that with spacing, but they may be flexible within 50'.
Ms. Schultze stated that the effort should be made to work with existing property owners
because they have investments that should be respected.
Mr. Werven asked how many existing homes are in this area.
Ms. Maidl pointed her lot out (12 acres) on the map and stated there is one other residential lot,
which his Mr. Granrud's (two acres), and there is a business, Oronoco Transfer (one acre), She
stated she was shocked when she was approached with this plan two weeks ago.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing.
Mr. Quinn moved to approve General Development Plan #147, to be known as Hypointe,
with staff -suggested findings and conditions, with condition number one deleted, and
condition number 3 reworded per Ms. Baker. Mr. Brede seconded the motion.
Ms. Schultze asked if condition number 3 could include a review with the property owners
adjacent to the road being proposed.
Ms. Baker explained that this problem occurs occasionally on GDPs and they need to consider
conceptually what might happen with an adjacent property. If the people refuse to sell there will
be a dead-end road in the Hypointe GDP where a temporary turnaround will need to be
provided.
Ms. Schultze stated that the location of the conceptual road location should reviewed with those
existing property owners to best maintain the quality of their property. She commented that to
grow around people, their vested interested needs to be included in the traffic planning
proposal.
Ms. Petersson commented that the existing property owners were blind -sided with this
development.
Mr. Reiter stated it is his understanding was there was a neighborhood meeting and the
developers contacted the property owners. Based on the standard procedures that have been
adopted, the appropriate effort was made.
Mr. Staver asked if the Planning Department provides the list of names of property owners to
be notified.
(OaQe 20
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9, 2000
Ms. Baker answered yes, and explained that the neighborhood meeting is not required for a
GDP, and does not have to be a certain amount of time before the public hearing with the
Commission. She stated that staff did provide the list and notified the property owners of both
the neighborhood meeting and the public hearing.
There was no further comment on Ms. Schultze's request for the addition to condition
number 3. The motion carried 5-2 with Ms. Schultze and Mr. Werven voting nay.
Conditions:
1. Storm water management must be provided for this development. Any ponds
serving 50 developable acres or less will remain private, and execution of long term
maintenance and ownership agreements will be required. All required private storm
water facilities must be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of
development.
2. The property shall be platted. When platted, the controlled access shall be provided
along the entire length of 500 Avenue NW and 65f6 Street NW, except for the one
private road access, two public road accesses, and one future public road access, as
shown on the GDP. When platted, controlled access will also be required within 50
feet from the intersections of any roads with 5e Avenue NW or 6r Street NW. in
addition, 60 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for both 5e Ave. NW and 65`" St.
NW.
3. Right and/or left turn lanes will be required along 50'' Ave. NW and 65`h St. NW.
4.
Traffic from the units lying to the east/south of the wetland and drainage way will I
primarily travel to the east and south through North Park to access 55f° St. NW. This
portion of the development shall contribute $40 per dwelling unit toward a fund that
will be dedicated to implementing the North Park neighborhood traffic management
plan.
5. The development shall be phased so that traffic volumes on 50'h Ave. NW, north of
55fb St NW, do not exceed approximately 3,000 average daily trips until it is
reconstructed. A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 50`" Ave. NW,
and 650' St. NW. Current City policy for substandard streets would require a
contribution of $30 per foot of frontage along both roadways. The City is currently
considering a Traffic Improvement District (TID) for this area. If a TID is adopted,
development of this property may be subject to additional charges.
6. A Wetland Replacement Plan will be required for any wetland filling. Any necessary
permits for said activity shall be secured prior to plat approval. in addition, the
applicant or consultant shall consult the MPCA and Army Corps of Engineers
regarding the use of the existing farm pond for storm water management as part of
this development. If use of this facility is not approved by said agencies, the GDP
will need to be revised to identify alternate area for storm water detention.
7. Park dedication requirement shall be met through a combination of land and cash.
The grading plan for this property will need to include grading two moderately sloped
i
Page 2 t
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
aaJ
areas for locating neighborhood play equipment and turf play fields, per the
specifications of the Park & Recreation Department.
8. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Rochester
that outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to; storm
water management; park dedication; traffic improvements; pedestrian facilities;
contributions for public infrastructure, including contribution obligations toward
traffic improvements in the area attributable to this project; and long term
maintenance and ownership of landscape islands shown on the GDP within the cul-
de-sacs.
9. The 30' access easement shown in Phase i shall be part of the outlot for the
park/open space area and not an easement.
10. A revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department reflecting all required
modifications, including identifying pedestrian trails along the east side of 50,h Ave.
NIN and the south side of 65m SG NIN and widening the trail through the wetland/open
space corridor to 10 feet
included in the proposal.
Mr. Svenby presented the Lan se Plan Amendme and Zone Change staff report, dated
February 4, 2000, to the Com ssion. The staff report are on file at the Rochester -Olmsted
Planning Department.
Ms. McGowan stated that he nephew rents one of the hou s on this parcel of land.
Mr. Svenby explained that t applicant is requesting a Land a Plan amendment for 55 acres
to the "Commercial" design ion and 45 acres for "Medium De ity Residential." He presented
a map of the area and revi ed the current land use plan. Mr. enby explained the
commercially designated ar a is requested to be zoned M-1, and a land to be designated
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING ;J001
DATE:=_O_in)
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO.
PUBLIC HEARINGS PLAIN\ING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Land Use Plan Amendment #00.01 by Badger Development, LLC to PREPARED BY:
amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to allow for approximately 55.34 Brent Svenby.
i acres of "commercial" land use designation and approximately 40.17 acres of "medium Planner
density" land use designation. The property is located west of West Circle Drive and south
of Valleyhigh Road NW and includes approximately 235 acres of land.
March 1, 2000
City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on February 9, 2000, to consider the Land Use Plan
Amendment request for the property. The applicant is requesting to designate approximately 55.34 acres 'Commercial" and
approximately 40.17 acres "Medium Density' on the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan,
Mac Hamilton, managing partner for Badger Development, addressed the Commission. Mr. Hamilton explained the
proposed project and why they are requesting the land use designations.
The Commission discussed whether the area proposed to be designated "Commercial" is appropriate based on the criteria as
included in the staff report. The Commission recommended approval, with staff suggested findings.
Mr. Quinn made a motion to approve Land Use Plan Amendment #00-01 by Badger Development, LLC, as requested
by the applicant, and with staff -suggested findings. Mr. Brede seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0.
anning Staff Recommendation:
See attached staff report dated February 4, 2000,
Council Action Needed:
1. The Council may approve or deny this petition. The Council's decision must be supported by findings based on the
criteria listed in the staff report. If the Council wishes to proceed with the land use plan amendment as petitioned, it
should instruct the City Attorney to prepare an resolution amending the Land Use Plan supported by findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
Attachments:
1- Staff Report dated February 4, 2000
2. Minutes of February 9, 2000
Distribution:
1. City Clerk
2. City Administrator
3. City Attorney: Legal Description attached
3. Planning Department File
4. Planning Department GIS
5. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday, March 6, 2000 in the Council / Board
r.hamber at the Rochester — Olmsted Government Center Building
Yaggy Colby Associates
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Seconded by: to:
A W
r
V
d
s-
o
a
x
w
v
L
Q
W
F" 149
I
E
cr
0
2
r-
11
N
mo
it
PROPOSED
1. _,BADGER PROPERTY
,PART OF SEC.10, T101N, R14W
ROCHESTER, OLMSTEO COUNTY. MINNESOTA
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
i
r
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
�p<HEIF ,r
R� TFO.�aEGL�T..
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/ 507/285-8232
PLANNING
GI S/ADDRE S SI NGl 5071285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGHPA 5071285-8224
FROM: Brent Svenby, Planner BUILDING CODE 507r285-8213
wELUSEPTIC 5071285-6345
DATE: February 4, 2000 FAX 507/287.2275
RE: Land Use Plan Amendment #00-01 by Badger Development, LLC. The
applicant is requesting to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use
Plan to allow for approximately 55.34 acres of "commercial" land use designation,
approximately 40.17 acres of "medium density" land use designation. The
property is located west of West Circle Drive and south of Valleyhigh Road NW.
Planning Department Review:
Petitioner: Badger Development, LLC
400 South Broadway #100
Rochester. MN 55904
Richard Badger
6004 Valleyhigh Road NW
Rochester, MN 55901
Consultant: Yaggy Colby Associates
717 Third Avenue SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Location of Property: The area includes approximately 235,64 acres of land
located south of Valleyhigh Road NW, west of West
Circle Drive (CR 22).
Requested Action: The applicant is requesting to designate
approximately 55.34 acres of land for commercial
land uses and 40.17 acres of medium density land
uses. According to the Rochester Urban Service
Area Land Use Plan, approximately 19 acres in the
southwest quadrant of the intersection of West Circle
Drive (CR 22) and Valleyhigh Road NW (CSAH 4) is
shown as being designated for "Commercial" and
approximately 9 acres for "Medium Density
Residential". The rest of the land is identified for
"Low Density Residential" types of uses on the
Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan Map.
The westerly most 80 acres is beyond the boundaries
of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan.
r
..Y.� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
a3y Page 2
LUPA 00-1
February 4, 2000
It is, however, within the 25-year Urban Service Area
for the City of Rochester an the Olmsted County
Future Land Use Plan Map. Land Use Designations
within this area are considered to be "Law Density
Residential".
The applicant has filed an annexation petition for the
235 acres shown on the GDP. A zone change
petition is also being reviewed currently with Land
Use Plan Amendment. The zone change is
requesting 55.34 acres of M-1, 40.17 acres of R-3,
and 140.13 acres of R-2.
A neighborhood meeting was held on January 25,
2000 to discuss this project with area residents and
landowners.
Existing Land Use:
The property is currently used as cropland.
Proposed Land Use:
The applicant has submitted a concurrent Zoning
District Amendment and General Development Plan
for this site. The applicant would like to use this site
for commercial -industrial, medium density residential
uses and low density residential uses. The entire
area consists of approximately 235 acres.
Adjacent Land Use and
North: The property to the north, across Valleyhigh
Zoning-
Road NW, is zoned A4 (Agricultural -Urban
Expansion) and A-2 (Agncultural Protection) on the
Olmsted County Zoning Map.
South: The property to the south, included in the
Hartman Farms GDP, is zoned M-1 (Mixed
Commercial -Industrial) and R-2 (Low Density
Residential) district on the City of Rochester Zoning
Map. The property west of the Hartman Farms GDP
is zoned A-4 (Agricultural -Urban Expansion) on the
Olmsted County Zoning Map.
East: Across West Circle Drive are the Circle Drive
Corporate Park Subdivisions and the Rochester
Technology Park Subdivisions. This land is zoned M-
2 (Industrial) on the City of Rochester Zoning Map.
There is one lot zoned M-1 in the Circle Drive
Corporate Park.
West: The property to the west is zoned A-4
(Agrtcultural-Urban Expansion) and A-2 (Agricultural
Protection) on the Olmsted County Zoning Map.
Transportation Access: Access to this site would be from Valleyhigh Road
and West Circle Drive. A Traffic Impact Study was
completed for the proposed Badger Ridge GDP. The
Transportation Staffs review of this report (see
attached) indicates that their position in planning for
the development of the traffic system for this site has
Page 3
LUPA 00-1
February 4. 2000
been to provide future improvements that could
respond to higher than expected levels of traffic. This
will provide the ability to respond if growth in the area
or traffic generation at the site exceeds expectations.
The Review of the Traffic Analysis is divided into two
sections: 1) Discussion of issues related to the
perimeter thoroughfare street system, 2) Discussion
of issues related tot he internal development layout of
the site.
Based upon the Traffic Impact Study prepared for the
GDP, this development in conjunction with the
anticipated development of other properties in the
travelshed of Valleyhigh Road will require the
upgrading of Valleyhigh Road to fully accommodate
future traffic demand. While there is available
capacity in the existing roadway system to
accommodate some development generated traffic,
full build -out of the Badge Ridge site would cause the
traffic volumes to exceed the capacity of the existing
roadway. The ultimate facility could include four
through lanes between West Circle Drive and 50'"
Ave., left and right turn lanes, along with necessary
boulevard or ditch area, potentially space for a
median and space for a bike trail. It also appears that
at some point in the future the access location for the
proposed commercial area would need to be
signalized. The first entrance, west of West Circle
Drive, has inadequate sight distance for east bound
traffic approaching. A decision will need to be made
whether this problem should be corrected
immediately. The review lists a number of
conclusions regarding the development.
Wetlands: According tot he Olmsted County Soil Survey, hydric
soils exist on the site. The Wetland LGU
Representative has stated that the property owner is
responsible for identifying wetlands on the property
and submitting this information.
Referral Comments: 1. Planning Department — Transportation
2. Planning Department— Wetlands
3. RPU Water Division
4. RPU Operations Division
5. City of Rochester Public Works Department
Report Attachments: 1. Proposed General Development Plan Map
2. Proposed Land Use Designation Map
3. Referral Comments
4. Review of Traffic Analysis (see GDP
attachments)
i
A / _ Page 4
A / LUPA 00-1
February 412000
Analysis for Land Use Plan Amendment:
The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan currently indicates that approximately 19 acres
in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of West Circle Drive (CR 22) and Valleyhigh Road
NW (CSAH 4) as being designated for "Commercial" types of uses and approximately 9 acres for
"Medium Density Residential" types of uses. The rest of the land is identified for "Low Density
Residential" types of uses. The westerly most 80 acres is beyond the boundaries of the
Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. It is, however, within the 25-year Urban Service
Area for the City of Rochester on the Olmsted County Future Land Use Plan Map. Land Use
Designations within this area are considered to be "Low Density Residential". The applicant is
requesting to designate approximately 55.34 acres of land far "commercial" uses and 40.17 acres
for "medium density" uses.
Medium Density Designation
The applicant is requesting that approximately 40 acres be re -designated from "low density
residential" to "medium density residential" types of uses. The current Land Use Plan Map shows
approximately 9 acres of "medium density residential" designated land to the east of this location.
The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan states that medium density housing should be
developed in close proximity to commercial, industrial, and institutional center and public facilities
and services. According to the land use plan, "medium density" residential areas are intended
primarily for multi -unit housing developments and other uses that are of similar character and
intensity or that are supportive of medium density neighborhoods.
Staff Suggested Findings for the "Medium Density Residential" Designation
The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan identifies location criteria for "medium density
residential" types of uses as follows:
a) Having love/ to fairly rolling terrain, outside flood prone or poorly drained areas, or
areas with steep slopes. The site is characterized by a fairly roiling terrain, outside of flood
prone and areas with steep slopes.
b) in close proximity to commercial areas, employment centers, recreation areas, or other
facilities that serve smaller households. The site is in fairly close proximity to a number of
employment, commercial, and recreation centers. Various employment centers, such as
Western Digital, IBM, Northwest Plaza shopping center, and various commerciallindustrial
subdivisions are located in close proximity. The applicant is proposing approximately 55 of
commercial -industrial adjacent to this site which would be considered an employment center.
The area is in close proximity to the Douglas Trail.
c) Having good access by means of collector, arterial, and expressway streets and transit
systems to employment centers, commercial areas, and community facilities. The
property does have direct access to Valleyhigh Road NW, which is designated as an "arterial".
The Planning Department's Transportation Staff has indicated that this proposed
development in conjunction with the anticipated development of other properties in the
travelshed of Valleyhigh Road will required a number of traffic improvements to the adjacent
roadways. The traffic analysis includes immediate traffic improvements as well as
accommodations for further improvements necessitated by growth. The future reconstruction
of Valleyhigh Road and additional improvements at the intersection of Valleyhigh Drive and
West Circle will increase the vehicle access to the site.
a) Suffered from the adverse influences of commercial, industrial, and other incompatible
activities. The property is surrounded on three sides by property that is designated of "Low
Density Residential" types of uses on the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan Map.
There is the possibility that the area to the east will be developed with commerciailindustrial
Page 5 9907
LUPA 00-1
February 4, 2000
types of uses. Any proposed development will need to provide adequate bufferyards
Commercial Designation
The applicant is requesting that approximately 55 acres be re -designated from "low density
residential" and "medium density residential" to "commercial" designation. The current Land Use
Plan Map shows approximately 9 acres of "medium density residential" and 18 acres of
"commercial" designated land in this location. Since the "commercial" designation allows both the
B-4 (General Commercial) and the M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial) zoning district and the
applicant is also proposing zoning the property to the M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial) district, it
would be appropriate to review the locational criteria for both the "commercial" and "industrial"
designation.
According the Land Use Plan "commercial" areas are intended primarily for uses related to retail
trade, temporary lodging, business and personal services, finance, insurance. Real estate, and
office uses of a similar character. Commercial uses range in intensity from professional offices
which may differ little in noise level, traffic volume, and appearance from residential uses, to high
activity uses such as fast food restaurants, shopping centers, major office buildings, hotels, and
gas stations. "Industrial" areas are intended primarily for manufacturing, transportation related
facilities, communications related facilities, privately owned utilities, warehousing and outside
storage of materials and equipment, and uses of similar character. Typically, industrial uses are
characterized by relatively high levels of truck traffic and noise.
Staff Suaaested Findings for the "Commercial" Desianation
The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan states that regional shopping centers
are most suitable in areas with the following characteristics:
a) Located at the intersection of a major arterial or higher level street with similar or
higher level streets. This site is bounded by Valleyhigh Road NW (CSAH 4) and West Circle
Drive (CR 22). Valleyhigh Road NW is classified as an arterial street and West Circle Drive is
an expressway on the ROCOG Thoroughfare Plan.
b) Having level terrain. The site does not have level terrain; it is somewhat rolling in nature with
some steep slopes. The site design and lot configuration in this proposed area could be
designed to work with the topography or with major excavation activity done to the site, the
site could have fairly level terrain.
c) Having good pedestrian, vehicular, and transit access. The site does have access to an
expressway and arterial roadway. The Planning Department's Transportation Staff has
indicated that this proposed development in conjunction with the anticipated development of
other properties in the travelshed of Valleyhigh Road will required a number of traffic
improvements to the adjacent roadways. The traffic analysis includes immediate traffic
improvements as wail as accommodations for further improvements necessitated by growth.
There is inadequate sight distance for eastbound traffic approaching this site. The inadequate
sight distance could be dealt with on an interim basis until reconstruction of Valleyhigh Road
is done. The future reconstruction of Valleyhigh Road and additional improvements at the
intersection of Valleyhigh Drive and West Circle will increase the vehicle access to the site.
When the property is developed trail facilities will be required along ail perimeter roadways.
d) Having at least 40 acres of land suitable for commercial development This site is
approximately 55.34 acres in size. The existing topography of the site does restrict the land
that is suitable for commercial development unless there is major excavation activity done to
cut and fill the site.
ASis
Page 6
LUPA 00-1
February 4, 2000
The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan identifies location criteria for
"Industrial" types of uses as follows:
a) Having level terrain (less than 5% slope). The site does not have level terrain. The terrain
is rolling with few fairly level areas. The site design and lot configuration in this proposed area
could be designed to work with the topography or with extensive excavation activity done to
the site, the site could have fairly level terrain.
b) Having excellent access to transportation facilities, including direct access to a
freeway, expressway, or arterial. Access to either rail or air transportation is also
desirable. The property proposed for the amendment has frontage on Valleyhigh Road NW,
which is classified as an arterial roadway on the ROCOG Currently Held Valid Thoroughfare
Plan and on West Circle Drive (CR 22) which is classified as an expressway on the Plan. The
Planning Department's Transportation Staff has indicated that this proposed development in
conjunction with the anticipated development of other properties in the travelshed of
Valleyhigh Road will required a number of traffic improvements to the adjacent roadways.
The traffic analysis includes immediate traffic improvements as wail as accommodations for
further improvements necessitated by growth. There is inadequate sight distance for
eastbound traffic approaching this site. The inadequate sight distance could be dealt with on
an interim basis until reconstruction of Valleyhigh Road is done.
c) Having adequate area available for industrial expansion, providing adequate space for
buffer areas, where needed, to protect adjacent residential use designations. The
existing topography of the site does restrict there being areas available and suitable for
industrial expansion unless there is major excavation activity done to cut and fill the site. The
rolling terrain of the land, steep slopes and parkland will act as natural buffers between the
residential areas and industrial areas.
d) Served by utilities and public facilities. Water and sewer will need to be extended to serve
this property. The Northwest High Level water system is available for connection near the
northeast comer and will be available at the southeast comer with the development of
Hartman Farms GDP. Preliminary computer water system modeling indicates that fire flows
to this area will be below the minimums set by the Fire Prevention Bureau but will increase
with future planned networking elsewhere in the system.
Staff Recommendation:
Based on the above -mentioned findings, it would appear that the proposed 40 acres to be
designated "medium density residential" generally meets the criteria. The area proposed to be
designated of "commercial" does not meet the criteria for having level terrain. Approximately 18
acres of this site is currently designated for "commercial" types of uses and the location of the
property makes it highly desirable for commerciallindustrial uses. The Planning Commission and
City Council should considered the appropriateness of the commercial designation and determine
if it is necessary to have this much land designated for "commercial" uses. If the site is
designated for "commercial", it is likely that the existing topography will be extensively altered.
Plannina Commission Action Required:
The Planning Commission must make a motion to recommend approval or denial of this request.
The Planning Commission must also make findings to support this recommendation. This
recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council and heard at a later public hearing.
kOCHESTER
Minnesota
I'_6%00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
En
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4" Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507.287.7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for
Land Use Plan Amendment #00-01 & Zone Change Petition #00-01 on the
Badger property. The following are Public Works comments on the proposal:
The Public Works Department suggests that the first access to CSAH
22 south of Valleyhigh Drive (CSAH 4) be limited to a right -in and right -
out access and that the full median access be closed. No access from
the east side of CSAH 22 to the highway is planned. A Zone change
to M-1 for the portion of property abutting CSAH 22 will undoubtedly
result in an increase in the amount of truck traffic and possibly the total
amount of traffic utilizing the median opening which would increase the
safety concerns of the Department Staff.
c:7EMP\LUPA*0M1.doe
a'� u
:ve !+'e:� e. we a'M,ver
January 21. 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester. MN 55904.7 996
REFERENCE: Land Use Plan Amendment ,00-01 and Zone Change Petition #00-01 by Badger
Development, LLC to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan and Official Zoning Map to allow
for M-1, R-3 and R-2 zoning.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced land use plan amendment is complete and our comments follow:
I. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments. The Land
Development Manager (507.281-6198) at the Public Works Department determines the applicability of these
fees.
2. The Northwest High Level Water System is available for connection near the northeast comer of the M-1 area
and will be available at the southeast comer with the construction of the planned Circle 19 Plaza.
3. Preliminary computer water system modeling indicates though that fire flows to the M-I area at this time will
be below the minimums set by the Fire Prevention Bureau for this type of use. The flows will however
increase with future planned networking elsewhere in the system. The modeling also indicated that at this
time the fire flows for the R-2 areas are at or above the minimums for that type of use. The R-3 area will be
determined at a later date and may or may not initially have adequate fire flows depending on the building
types and sizes in this area.
4. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout to serve this
area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
Cbu R'
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
Yaggy Colby Associates
Badger Development, LLC
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906.2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542
ru aY'
f'
aye n?a•d�r-, .._ :r'<<��::r
507/280-1579
January 18, 2000
TO: Suzanne LaPalm, Planning Department
Consolidated Planning Dept.
FROM: Michael J. Engle, Supv. Of Distribution Design
Rochester Public Utilities
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment #00-01 and Zone Change Petition #00-01 by Badger
Development LLC. The applicant is requesting to amend the Rochester Urban
Service Area Land Use Plan and Official Zoning Map to allow for approximately
55.34 acres of "commercial" land use designation and M-1 (Mixed Commercial -
Industrial) zoning, and approximately 40.17 acres of "medium density" land use
designation and R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning. The applicant is also
requesting to re -zone approximately 140.13 acres from the R-1 (Mixed Single
Family) residential district to R-2 (Low Density) residential district. The property
is located west of West Circle Drive and south of Valleyhigh Road NW and
includes approximately 235 acres of land.
RPU's Operations Division has reviewed this land use plan and zone change and has no
objection as it is outside our service area at this time. However, we do intend to serve the total
area in the future.
Sincerely, %)7iC(( z[,('U//'',Q�
Michael J. Engle
ks
c: W. Lorber
T. Adkins, City Attorney
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, MN 55906-2813
telephone 507.280.1540 facsimile 507.280.1542
;qZ a¢e 21
City Plantnng and Zoning: Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
areas for locating neighborhood play
specifications of the Park & Recreation C
and turf play fields, per the
B. The applicant shall ter into a Develo ent Agreement with the City of Rochester
that outlines the obli ions of the plicant relating to, but not limited to; storm
water management; pa dedica ' n; traffrc improvements; pedestrian facilities;
contributions for public ras cture, including contribution obligations toward
traffic improvements in t area attributable to this project; and tong term
maintenance and ownershl o andscape islands shown on the GDP wifhin the cul_
de-sacs.
9. The 30' access eas ent shown Phase l shall be part of the outlot for the
park/open spacea, and not an ease% ent.
10. A revised GDP s N be filed with the Plan g Department reflecting all required
modifications, i luding identifying pedestr n trails along the east side of 501h Ave.
NW and the south side of 6e St. NW and widening the trail through the wedand(open
space corridor to 10 feet.
Land Use Plan Amendment #00.01 and Zone Change Petition #00-01 by Badger
Development, LLC. The applicant Is requesting to amend the Rochester Urban Service
Area Land Use Plan and Official Zoning Map to allow for approximately 55 34 acres of
"commercial" land use designation and M-1 (Mixed Commercial industrial) zoning, and
approximately 40.17 acres of "medium density" land use designation and R 3 (Medium
Density Residentlai) zoning. The applicant is also requesting to re zone approximately
140.13 acres from the R-1 (Mixed Single Family) residential district to R 2 (Low Density)
residential district The property is located west of West Circle Drive and south of
Vallevhigh Road NW and includes approximately 235 acres of land
incivaea in the Proposal.
Mr. Svenby presented the Land Use Plan Amendment and Zone Change staff report, dated
February 4, 2000, to the Commission. The staff reports are on file at the Rochester -Olmsted
Planning Department.
Ms. McGowan stated that her nephew rents one of the houses on this parcel of land.
Mr. Svenby explained that the applicant is requesting a Land Use Plan amendment for 55 acres
to the "Commercial" designation and 45 acres for "Medium Density Residential." He presented
a map of the area and reviewed the current land use plan. Mr. Svenby explained the
commercially designated area is requested to be zoned M-1, and the land to be designated
Page 22
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9, 2000
medium density residential be zoned R-3, with the remainder of the site zoned R-2. He pointed
out this is the same land that was reviewed for annexation earlier in the meeting.
Mr. Svenby explained that a traffic study was done for this area and Transportation staffs
comments are included in the staff report for the GDP. He noted that as a result of the study
was determined that Valleyhigh Road NW and 50m Avenue will need to be upgraded with the
proposed development. He pointed out that the criteria and staff -suggested findings are
included in the report. Mr. Svenby stated that the area requested to be designated
"Commercial" will most likely need extensive land alteration to make it suitable for the
"Commercial" designation, so the Commission should consider if this land is suitable.
Mr. Svenby commented that the 140 acres requested to be zoned R-2 would be consistent with
the current land use designation. He referred to the staff -suggested findings and noted that if
the Commission feels the entire 50 acres is not suitable for the "Commercial" designation, any
zoning should be consistent with the designation on the Land Use Plan.
Mac Hamilton, managing partner for Badger Development, addressed the Commission. He
stated that Richard Badger is also in attendance. He complimented Cascade Township and
noted they were receptive to their plan and gave approval of the project. Mr. Hamilton
explained that they are trying to address the critical housing shortage with affordable homes in
the development, with the homes being starter to mid -level. He referred to the area proposed
for M-1 zoning and pointed out that currently West Circle Drive is carrying in excess of 25,000
cars per day and by 2015, there will be 25,000 more vehicles on Valleyhigh Road NW, with 50,'
Avenue being extended to 19"Street. Mr. Hamilton noted that the plan before the Commission
has been slightly modified after input from staff and he commented that they have met with staff
to define the parkland area. He explained that the area requested for M-1 zoning is less than
50 acres, it is consistent with the zoning to the south, and the area at the north is at a high -
traffic intersection that is already signalized. Mr. Hamilton stated that a company called
Cellestica, who is acquiring the printed circuit board division from IBM, is considering this site,
along with two others, for their business. If that doesn't go through, they have a purchase
agreement with a bank. He explained how the adjacent area will be developed and stated they
feel their proposal is an appropriate use. Mr. Hamilton expressed agreement with Mike
Nigbur's request that an ingress/egress median strip be closed, leaving a right in/right out only.
He referred to the terrain and explained that they will have to engage in some cutting and have
some looping of the water mains. He noted they received confirmation today from a church that
wants to located on the development. Mr. Hamilton explained that the parkland will serve dual
role —parkland and storm water detention area. He stated they will deal with any hydric soils on
the property.
Mr. Hamilton referred to conditions of the GDP, and stated they are in agreement with the
conditions, noting that the fourth bullet on condition number 8 is already done on the revised
plan. He stated that Bill Anderson is available for technical questions.
Mr. Werven asked if the terrain in the M-1 area is staffs major concern for that designation.
Mr. Svenby stated because of the terrain, it doesn't meet the locational criteria for a
"CommerciaUindustrial" designation, so it if is developed as commercial, it is likely that the
developer will have to go through a Substantial Land Alteration to allow flat, buildable pads,
which are typical for commercial areas.
Wqq Page 23
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 1-000
Mr. Hamilton noted that they would go through a process similar to the one Mr. Tointon went
through earlier in the meeting, where he provided the cut and fill diagram. He explained how
they would level the land and stated there would be some cut and fill.
Mr. Werven asked why that isn't part of staffs findings.
Mr. Svenby explained that the ordinance does allow for the applicant to request the Substantial
Land Alteration with the GDP or Land Subdivision Permit, but often at the time of the GDP, it
isn't known how much material needs to be cut.
Mr. Werven noted that staff is recommending denial of the zone change, based on the fact that
it is too hilly, and asked why not recommend that it be passed based on the condition that there
be the land alteration.
Mr. Svenby explained that conditions cannot be placed on a zone change.
Ms. Schultze commented that she doesn't feel she has enough data to consider the appropriate
amount of commercial land in that vicinity.
Mr. Svenby stated that the employment projections he has seen have shown the greatest
growth in the sectors with commercial development, so with that growth, there will be the need
for more land designated for commercial1industrial types of uses.
Ms. Baker pointed out that the question is whether this specific property is appropriate for the
"Commercial" land use designation and M-1 zoning that is being proposed, based on the
criteria.
Mr. Hamilton explained that the property is configured as such because you don't want to flow
into a commercial area from a residential area. He described the access to the commercial
area and explained that with the access required, they need to have this particular amount of
land designated as commercial. He reviewed the location of a limestone shelf and how that
and the grade affect the roadway. He also explained the routes the trucks will take. Mr.
Hamilton stated there are terrain difficulties where the park is located, and until they do the
grading activities, that area is a water ravine.
Keith Hewlett, 5367 Valleyhigh Road NW, addressed the Commission. He is concerned with
duplex and four plex buildings, along with motels, being developed. He stated he heard there
will be $60,000 to $100,000 homes built, with no sidewalks or garages. He pointed out that he
isn't opposed to single-family homes or the M-1 area.
Matt Prigge, 5516 Valleyhigh Road NW, addressed the Commission. He expressed concerns
that the homes will be only in the $80,000 range and will be on smaller lots. He asked if the
homes will have garages.
Mr. Hamilton stated that there may be some people who buy a house and can't afford a garage.
He referred to Country Club Manor and EIton Hills, noting they have the same size lots. The
development they are proposing is similar in character. He commented that they will build
garages if the market dictates.
,
Paee 24 aq!
City Plannine and Zontne Commission Minutes
Heanng Date: February 9, 2000
Arlene Hewlett, 5371 Valleyhigh Road NW, addressed the Commission. She is not objecting to
the residential development, but she doesn't want to see motels in the area.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing for the Land
Use Plan Amendment and Zone Change.
Mr. Quinn moved to approve Land Use Plan Amendment #00-01 by Badger Development,
LLC, as requested by the applicant, and with staff -suggested findings. Mr. Brede
seconded the motion. The motion carried 7.0.
Ms. Schultze commented that the issue of Substantial Land Alteration is relatively new and in
conjunction with a zone change, it brings up all sorts of questions. She feels that in the near
future, the Commission needs to discuss this type of application in general.
Mr. Quinn made a motion to approve Zoning District Amendment #00-01 by Badger
Development, LLC, with staff -suggested findings, and consistent with the land use
designation the Commission approved. Mr. Brede seconded the motion, which carried
7-0.
Mr. Svenby presented the General Development Plan staff report, dated February 4, 2000, to
the Commission. The staff report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department.
Mr. Svenby stated that the applicant submitted a revised GDP, which has been distributed to
the Commission. He referred to the traffic recommendations contained in the packet that were
the result of the traffic impact study, noting that one of the major recommendations is the
upgrading of Valleyhigh Road NW. He reviewed the access and explained that the applicant
will need to negotiate on the timing of road improvements and cost of signalization. Mr. Svenby
referred to the staff -suggested findings and commented that staff recommends approval subject
to the 10 conditions listed in the report, and two additional conditions:
11. The roadway connection shown to the Hartman Farms GDP be reviewed by the City
Engineer and the Planning Department Transporation Division for the appropriate design.
The adjacent property owner must also be included in the discussion of this roadway
alignment.
12. Additional conditions may be recommended by staff prior to the GDP going to Council.
He noted that he sent out the revised plans today to agencies for their comments, and
additional conditions may result. He stated that Mr. Reiter is available for questions regarding
traffic and access.
Ms. Petersson asked what uses are allowed in the R-2 zoning district.
Ms. Baker read the uses allowed, as listed in the Land Development Manual.
Mr. Hamilton made himself available for questions.
1 Y� Page 2:
City Planting and Zonme Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. 2000
LaDue Vatland, 5711 Valley High Road NW. addressed the Commission. He commented that
Country Club Manor is quite old and at the time it was developed, people didn't have the
number of cars they do now. He feels there should at lease be a storage shed required for
each lot. Mr. Vatland also expressed concerns about the small lot sizes.
Mr. Hamilton stated it isn't their intent to have homes built without garages, but conceded that it
could happen.
Matt Prigge, 5516 Valley High Road NW, addressed the Commission. He asked the
developers to make a provision so the lot sizes allow space to build garages in the future if the
buyers don't want one initially.
Mr. Svenby explained that the minimum lot size in the R-1 zoning district is 6000 square feet,
with a minimum frontage of 60', and 5500 square feet in the R-2 district, with a minimum of 50'
of frontage for single-family detached lots, so these lots are larger than what is required.
Mike Coats, 4410 19'" Street NW, addressed the Commission. He stated he has an option on
the land to the south of this development, and in reviewing what the developer has been done,
he finds this to be a blend that is well thought out and consistent with what he is proposing. He
pointed out that not all the residential area will be developed at once and that it will be
staggered.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing.
Mr. Staver made a motion to approve General Development Plan #148, to be known as
Badger Ridge, with staff -suggested findings and conditions, including the two additional
conditions stated by Mr. Svenby. Ms. McGowan seconded the motion.
Mr. Werven noted that last year they revised the Manufactured Home Ordinance so that it now
requires garages or storage sheds, and he feels this shows inconsistency in not requiring
garages for the stick -built homes. Requiring that a certain segment of housing should have
garages and another segment should not is an inconsistency within the Ordinance.
Several Commission members agreed.
Ms. Schultze stated that condition number 11 could have been applied to the Arcon
Development GDP, and if it had, she would have been able to vote for approval.
The motion carried 7-0.
Conditions:
I. Approval of this GDP is contingent upon the Land Use Plan and Zoning District
Amendments being approved. If the land use designation and zoning classification
are different than what is shown on the GDP, the GOP will need to be revised to be
consistent with the approved zoning.
2. Storm water management must be addressed for this development. The proposed
plan shows on -site detention will be provided.
I
Page 26
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Heanng Date: February 9.2000
MI
3. Prior the submittal of any plats for this development, issues regarding the required
right-of-way for Valleyhigh Road need to be determined. Negotiations will need to be
conducted regarding cost contribution towards needed traffic management
improvements including turn lanes, traffic control measure and trail improvements.
This will require the applicant to work with the Olmsted County Engineer, the City
Engineer and the Transportation Division of the Planning Department.
4. Prior to the submittal of any plats for this development, decisions must be made
regarding the timing of improvement projects along Valleyhlgh Road and 50'
Avenue. These decisions will include a determination of whether an interim upgrade
will be constructed or whether programming of the full corridor upgrade should be
initiated. This will require the applicant to work with the Olmsted County Engineer,
the City Engineer, and the Transportation Division of the Planning Department.
5. Further evaluation of roadway cross sections on the approaches to the intersections
on Valleyhigh Road and West Circle Drive is needed prior to platting to determine the
needed outbound roadway widths.
6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the
obligation of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm water management,
park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities and contributions for
public infrastructure (SAG/WAC, connection charges, etc.)
7. A wetland delineation for the site must submitted and approved by the LGU prior to
platting of the property. If development proposes to impact the wetlands,
appropriate permits must be secured from the LGU or the development design must
be revised to avoid those areas.
8. The GDP be revised to reflect the following modifications:
> Access control along the entire length of Valleyhigh Road, 500 Avenue and West
Circle Drive except where the proposed roadways are located. Access control be
indicated along both sides of the internal street back to the first east -west cul-de-
sac at the first access location west of West Circle Drive and 250 feet back at the
first access on West Circle Drive south of Valleyhigh Road.
➢ A 10 foot trail facility along the south side on Valleyhlgh Road, the east side of
50'" Avenue and the west side of West Circle Drive.
➢ A roadway connection from the residential area to the commercial area be
provided In order to minimize the need for local area traffic to circulate out onto
Valleyhigh Road for trips between these areas.
> The private lots taking direct access to 50w Avenue be eliminated.
> Adequate parkland meeting the dedication requirements be provided.
> A roadway connection be provided from phase III to the 40 acres to the north.
Page?7
ity Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9, 2000
> The right-of-way for 50t° Avenue be shown at 120 feet.
> The required right-of-way needed for Valleyhigh Road. Right-of-way will need to
be determined by the County Engineer.
9. Prior to the approval of any final plats for the property, the EA process needs to be
completed.
10. That revised copies of the GDP be provided to the Planning Department which reflect
all required modifications,
11. The roadway connection shown to the Hartman Farm GDP be reviewed by the City
Engineer and the Planning Department Transportation Division for the appropriate
design. The adjacent property owner must also be included in the discussion of this
roadway alignment.
12. Additional conditions may be recommended by staff prior to the GDP going to
Council.
No other
ADJOURN:
discussed.
Motion made by Ms. M
Petersson, Vice Chair,
Respectfully Submitted:
ilip H. Wheeler, AICP
sml
C:tcpzcicpzc2-9.doc
'adjourn, seconded by Ms. Schultze. Ms.
the meeting at 11:05 p.m.
Mr.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING
DATE: 1-b=U1
AGENDA SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1NG DEPT: ITEM NO.
PLANNING (& _q
i i cM DESCRIPTION: Zone Change Petition #00-01 by Badger Development, LLC to PREPARED BY:
designate approximately 55.34 acres of land M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial) zoning Brent Scenbv,
district, approximately 40.17 acres of R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district and Planner
approximately 140.13 acres of R-2 (Low Density Residential) zoning district. The property
is located west of West Circle Drive and south of Valleyhigh Road NW and includes
approximately 235 acres of land.
March 1. 2000
City Planning and Zoninq Commission Recommendation
The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public nearing on February 9, 2000, to consider a zone change request to
rezone 16.27 acres from the R-1 (Mixed Singh Family) to the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) and 5 acres from the R-1
(Mixed Single Family) to the B-5 (Residential Commercial) District.
Mac Hamilton, managing partner for Badger Development, addressed the Commission. Mr. Hamilton explained the
proposed project and why they are requesting the zoning districts.
The Commission reviewed the zone change request based on the criteria as included in the staff report and recommended
approval, with staff suggested findings. '
Mr. Quinn made a motion to approve Zoning District Amendment #00-01 by Badger Development, LLC, based on I
staff -suggested findings and consistent with the land use designation the Commission approved. Mr. Brede
seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0.
nning Staff Recommendation:
See attached staff report dated February 4, 2000.
Council Action Needed:
1. The Council may approve or deny this petition. The Council's decision must be supported by findings based on
the criteria list in the staff report. If the Council wishes to proceed with the zone change as petitioned, it should
instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance that can be adopted supported by findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
Attachments:
1. Staff Report dated February 4, 2000
2. Minutes of February 9, 2000 CPZC Meeting (see LUPA report)
Distribution:
1. City Clerk
12. City Administrator
3. City Attorney: Legal Description attached
3. Planning Department File
4. Planning Department - GIS
5. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m
Chamber at the Rochester - Olmsted Government Center Building
Yaggy Colby Associates
c�
14- C Pic emu,,
CIF MMI4. LJ.LPA �C
on Monday, March 6, 2000 in the Council / Board
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Seconded by. to:
I
aSD
1_, r - ADCiER PROPERTY
r P{�RT OFk 20,' WN, 0.14W
ROCN It. OIMSTED COUNTY, MINI
GENERALOEVELOPMENTPLAN
%!✓J
I
2gp'v PPI
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
K��N4,�CF g,yt�
:-.--- --
ky TF D. aII;L]1•`
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/ 507/255.8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADDRESSING/ 507/2B5.8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGHPA 5071285-8224
FROM: Brent Svenby, Planner WILDING CODE 507/285-8213
wELLSEPTIC 507/285-8345
DATE: February 4, 2000 FAX 507/287-2275
RE: Zoning District Amendment #00-01 by Badger Development, LLC to zone
approximately 140.13 acres to the R-2 (Low Density Residential) district,
40.17 acres to the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) district and 55.34
acres to the M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial) District. The property is
located west of West Circle Drive and south of Valleyhigh Road NW.
Planning Department Review:
Petitioner/Owner: Badger Development, LLC
400 South Broadway #100
Rochester, MN 55904
Richard Badger
6004 Valleyhigh Road NW
Rochester, MN 55901
Location of Property-
The area includes approximately 235.64 acres of land
located south of Valleyhigh Road NW, west of West
Circle Drive.
Requested Action:
The petitioner is requesting that approximately 140.13
acres be zoned R-2 (Low Density Residential) district,
40.17 acres to the R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
district and 55.34 acres to the M-1 (Mixed
Commercial -Industrial) District.
Existing Land Use:
This property is currently used as cropland.
Proposed Land Use:
The applicant has submitted a concurrent Land Use
Plan Amendment and General Development Plan for
this site. The applicant would like to use this site for
low density residential, medium density residential
and commercial -industrial types of uses. The
accompanying General Development Plan for this site
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUN TY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
a S3
Page 2
Zone Change 00-1
February 4, 2000
indicates the proposed roadway patterns throughout
to the property, lot layouts, drainage patterns, zoning
classifications, parkland location.
A neighborhood meeting was held on January 26,
2000 to discuss this project with area residents and
landowners.
Adjacent Land Use and North: The property to the north, across Valleyhigh
Zoning: Road NW, is zoned A-4 (Agricultural -Urban
Expansion) and A-2 (Agricultural Protection) on the
Olmsted County Zoning Map.
South: The property to the south, included in the
Hartman Farms GDP, is zoned M-1 (Mixed
Commercial -Industrial) and R-2 (Low Density
Residential) district on the City of Rochester Zoning
Map. The property west of the Hartman Farms GDP
is zoned A-4 (Agricultural -Urban Expansion) on the
Olmsted County Zoning Map.
East: Across West Circle Drive are the Circle Drive
Corporate Park Subdivisions and the Rochester
Technology Park Subdivisions. This land is zoned M-
2 (Industrial) on the City of Rochester Zoning Map.
There is one lot zoned M-1 in the Circle Drive
Corporate Park.
West: The property to the west is zoned A-4
(Agricultural -Urban Expansion) and A-2 (Agricultural
Protection) on the Olmsted County Zoning Map.
90 Page 3
Zone Change 00-1
February 4, 2000
Transportation Access: Access to this site would be from Valleyhigh Road
and West Circle Drive. A Traffic Impact Study was
completed for the proposed Badger Ridge GDP. The
Transportation Staffs review of this report (see
attached) indicates that their position in planning for
the development of the traffic system for this site has
been to Drovide future improvements that could
resporc to higher than expected levels of traffic. This
will provide the ability to respond if growth in the area
or traffic generation at the site exceeds expectations.
The Review of the Traffic Analysis is divided into two
sections: 1) Discussion of issues related to the
perimeter thoroughfare street system, 2) Discussion
of issues related tot he internal development layout of
the site.
Based upon the Traffic Impact Study prepared for the
GDP, this development in conjunction with the
anticipated development of other properties in the
travelshed of Valleyhigh Road will require the
upgrading of Valleyhigh Road to fully accommodate
future traffic demand. While there is available
capacity in the existing roadway system to
accommodate some development generated traffic,
full build -out of the Badge Ridge site would cause the
traffic volumes to exceed the capacity of the existing
roadway. The ultimate facility could include four
through lanes between West Circle Drive and 50"
Ave., left and right turn lanes, along with necessary
boulevard or ditch area, potentially space for a
median and space for a bike trail. It also appears
that at some point in the future the access location for
the proposed commercial area would need to be
signalized. The first entrance, west of West Circle
Drive, has inadequate sight distance for east bound
traffic approaching. A decision will need to be made
whether this problem should be corrected
immediately. The review lists a number of
conclusions regarding the development.
Wetlands: According to the Olmsted County Soil Survey, hydric
soils exist on the site. The Wetland LGU
Representative has stated that the property owner is
responsible for identifying wetlands on the property
and submitting this information as part of this
application.
Referral Comments: 1. Planning Department — Transportation
2. Planning Department — Wetlands
3. RPU Water Division
4. RPU Operations Division
5. City of Rochester Public Works Department
Report Attachments: 1. Proposed Zoning District Map
Page 4
Zone Change 00-1
February 4. 2000
2. Proposed General Development Plan Map
3. Referral Comments
4. Review of Traffic Analysis (see GDP
attachments)
Analysis and Staff Suggested Findings:
ass
The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan currentty indicates that approximately 19 acres
in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of West Circle Drive (CR 22) and Valleyhigh Road
NW (CSAH 4) as being designated for "Commercial" types of uses and approximately 9 acres for
"Medium Density Residential" types of uses. The rest of the land is identified for "Low Density
Residential" types of uses. The westerly most 80 acres is beyond the boundaries of the
Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. It is, however, within the 25-year Urban Service
Area for the City of Rochester on the Olmsted County Future Land Use Plan Map. Land Use
Designations within this area are considered to be "Low Density Residential". The applicant is
requesting to designate approximately 55.34 acres of land for commercial land uses and 40.17
acres of medium density land uses. The applicant has submitted a concurrent Land Use Plan
Amendment, Zone Change, and General Development Plan for this site. Recent revisions to the
Land Development Manual require that a General Development Plan (GDP) be submitted with any
Land Use Plan Amendments or with certain "upzonings"; in this case, both a Land Use Plan
Amendment and a proposed zoning to the R-2, R-3 and M-1 district trigger the need for a GDP. In
addition, a "Traffic Impact Study" is required. A review of the traffic study is attached.
Under the provisions of Paragraph 60.338 of the Rochester Land Development Manual, the
Commission shall recommend for approval and the Council shall approve, an application
requesting an amendment to the zoning map if the amendment satisfies the following criteria:
1) The criteria of this subdivision apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by formal
petition. An amendment need only satisfy one of the following criteria:
a) The area, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan;
b) The area was originally zoned erroneously due to a technical or administrative error;
c) While both the present and proposed zoning districts are consistent with the Plan, the
proposed district better furthers the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan as
found in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, Chapter
3 of the Housing Plan, and Chapter 10 of the ROCOG Long Range Transportation Plan;
or
d) The area has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to
rezone so as to encourage development or redevelopment of the area.
Proposed R-2 (Low Density Residential):
The proposed zoning of the property to the R-2 (Low Density Residential) district is
consistent with the land use plan and would serve to better further the policies and goals
of the Comprehensive Plan and Housing Plan. The westerly most 80 acres is beyond the
boundaries of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan but it is, however, within
the 25-year Urban Service Area for the City of Rochester on the Olmsted County Future
Land Use Plan Map. Land use designations within this area are considered to be "Low
Density Residential" and the R-2 zoning district is consistent with the "Low Density
Residential" designation.
�+— Page 5
Zone Change 00-1
February 4, 2000
Proposed R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
If the accompanying Land Use Plan Amendment from the "Low Density Residential"
designation to the "Medium Density Residential" designation is approved for this site, the
proposed zoning of the property to the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) district would
make the zoning of the property consistent with the Plan. There is also a shortage of this
type of zoned property in Rochester. Since this property appears to meet the general
standards of the Land Use Plan for medium density residential development, it could be in
the public interest to rezone this property to R-3.
Proposed M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial):
If the accompanying Land Use Plan Amendment from the "Low Density Residential" and
"Medium Density Residential" designation to the "Commercial" designation is approved for
this site, the proposed zoning of the property to the M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial)
district would make the zoning of the property consistent with the Plan. Employment
projections show the most growth in commercial types of uses (office, business services,
retail trade, etc.). With these employment projections there would appear to be a need for
land that is zoned for commercial to allow for expansions of employment center.
2) The criteria of this subdivision also apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by
formal petition. However, an amendment must satisfy all of the following criteria:
a) the permitted uses allowed within the proposed zoning district will be appropriate on the
subject property and compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood; and
Proposed R-2 (Low Density Residential):
The permitted uses allowed within the R-2 zoning district would be appropriate on the
subject property and compatible with adjacent properties.
Proposed R-3 (Medium Density Residential):
The permitted uses allowed within the R-3 zoning district would be appropriate on the
subject property and compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood. This site
appears to be consistent with the Land Use Plan's locational criteria for medium density
residential uses (see the staff report for Land Use Plan Amendment #00-1), It is within
close proximity to a number of employment and commercial centers, including Western
Digital, IBM, Northwest Plaza shopping center and other various commercial/industrial
subdivisions.
A Traffic Impact Study has been submitted and reviewed for this project. The review of
the study indicates improvements and modifications (now and in the future) are necessary
to the adjacent roadways to accommodate project traffic volumes.
Proposed M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial):
The permitted uses allowed in the M-1 (Mixed Commercial — Industrial) zoning district
would be appropriate on the subject property and compatible with the uses designated on
the proposed General Development Plan. Development of the property will require that
the performance standards within the M-1 district be met. These performance standards
should be adequate to mitigate the impacts certain uses within the M-1 zoning district may
have on the surrounding undeveloped properties.
Page 6
Zone Change 00-1
February 4, 2000
2.51
A Traffic Impact Study has been suomitted and reviewed for this project. The review of
the study indicates improvements and modifications (now and in the future) are necessary
to the adjacent roadways to accommodate project traffic volumes.
b) the proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning. (Spot Zoning involves the
reclassification of a single lot or several small lots to a district which is different than that
assigned to surrounding properties, for reasons inconsistent with the purposes set forth in
this ordinance, the state enabling legislation, or the decisions of courts in this state).
Proposed R-2 (Low Density Residential):
The proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning since it is consistent with the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed R-3 (Mixed Density Residential):
The proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning since it would be consistent with
the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, especially if the concurrent Land Use Plan
Amendment is approved
Proposed M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial):
The proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning since it would be consistent with
the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, especially if the concurrent Land Use Plan
Amendment is approved.
Staff Recommendation:
The ability to consider the Land Use Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and General Development
Plan concurrently allows the City to consider this development proposal as a package. Based
upon the accompanying reports for the Land Use Plan Amendment and General Development
Plan, as well as the Transportation Division's analysis of the Traffic Impact Study for this site, Staff
would recommend that approvals of the zoning districts be consistent with what the land use
designation is.
Planning Commission Action Required:
The Planning Commission must make a motion to recommend approval or denial of this request.
The Planning Commission must also make findings to support this recommendation. This
recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council and heard at a later public hearing.
tl
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING q
DATE: 3-6-6=00
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO,
P[BLIC HEARLNGS PLANNING S �S
ITEM DESCRIPTION: General Development Plan #148 by Badger Development, LLC to be PREPARED BY:
known as Badger Ridge. The applicant proposes to develop approximately 235 acres of Brent Svenby,
land located west of West Circle Drive and south of Valleyhigh Road NW. The applicant is Planner
proposing to develop low density residential, medium density residential and mixed
commercial industrial uses. Parkland, stormwater detention ponds and public roadways
are included in the proposal.
March 2, 2000
"One of the conditions recommended by the CPZC stated that additional conditions might be recommended by staff prior to
the GDP going to Council. New recommended conditions are shown as underlined text below. Conditions that are shown as
stcikea can be removed because the revised GDP accommodates it.
City Planning and Zonina Commission Recommendation:
On February 9, 2000 the City Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this General Development Plan along with a
petition to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan and Zoning for this area.
The Commission reviewed this proposal according to the criteria listed in Paragraph 61.215 of the Zoning Ordinance and
Land Development Manual.
Mr. Stever made a motion to approve General Development Plan #148, to be known as Badger Ridge, with staff -
suggested findings and conditions as amended. Ms. McGowan seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0.
Conditions:
1. Approval of this GDP is contingent upon the Land Use Plan and Zoning District Amendments being approved. It
the land use designation and zoning classification are different than what is shown on the GDP, the GDP will
need to be revised to be consistent wit�proved zoning.
2. Storm water management must be'dAressed for this development. The proposed plan shows on -site detention
3. Prior the submittal of any plats for this development, issues regarding the required right-of-way for Valleyhigh
Road needs to be determined. Negotiations will need to be conducted regarding cost contribution towards
needed traffic management improvements including turn lanes, traffic control measure and trail improvements.
This will require the applicant to work with the Olmsted County Engineer, the City Engineer and the
Transportation Division of the Planning Department.
4. Prior to the submittal of any plats for this development, decisions must be made regarding the timing o1
improvement projects along Valleyhigh Road and 50`8 Avenue. These decisions will include a determination of
whether an interim upgrade will be constructed or whether programming of the full corridor upgrade should be
initiated. This will require the applicant to work with the Olmsted County Engineer, the City Engineer, and the
Transportation Division of the Planning Department.
5. Further evaluation of roadway cross sections on the approaches to the intersections on Valleyhigh Road and
West Circle Drive is needed prior to platting to determine the needed outbound roadway widths.
Pe C �� rvt , n„'Tt'S i-r o .� a r e V sous
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
Page 2 ^�
RCA Q(
March 2. 2000
i
6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the obligations of
applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm water management, park dedication, traffic improvem
pedestrian facilities and contributions for public infrastructure (SAClWAC, connection charges, etc.)
A wetland delineation for the site must submitted and approved by the LGU prior to platting of the property. J
development proposes to impact the wetlands, appropriate permits must be secured from the LGU or th.
development design must be revised to avoid those areas.
6. The GDP be revised to reflect the following modifications:
Access control
250 feet back at th,
first access onto West Circle Drive south of Valleyhigh Road. Additional access control maybe requires
through platting.
A 10 foot trail facility along the south side on Valleyhigh Road, the east side of 50`" Avenue and the wes
side of West Circle Drive. These Dedestrian facilities most ha lahalpA as to rant;. u i,rth ., ,tie r_na
P
Adequate parkland meeting the dedication mquimments be-provAefed.
> The required right-of-way needed for Valleyhigh Road. Right-of-way will need to be determined by th,
County Engineer.
9. Prior to the approval of any final plats for the property, the EA W process needs to be completed.
10. That revised copies of the GDP be provided to the Planning Department which reflect all required modifications.
11. The roadway connection shown to the Hartman Farm GDP be reviewed by the City Engineer and the Planning
Department Transportation Division for the appropriate design. The adjacent property owner must also be
included in the discussion of this roadway alignment.
12.
13. At the time of platting, easements will be required for off -site utilities
14. The oroperty recently acquired by the applicant from Olmsted County, abutting West Circle Drive be included it
this GDP. The Property will need to the annexed.
15. The alignment of the intersection immediately north of the most northerly Point of the park in phase i be reviser
to City standards.
16. The parkland shown in Phase /it be revised to have a 30' access from a public roadway. The location of th,
access must be approved by the Park and Recreation Department.
Planning Staff Recommendation:
See attached staff report dated February 4, 2000.
ace 3
RCA
March 2. 2000
Council Action Needed:
�Gr
1. The Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the general development plan. The Council mus
make findings based on the criteria listed in Paragraph 61.215.
2. If the Council wishes to proceed with the general development plan as proposed, it should instruct the Cit,
Attorney to prepare a resolution for Council approval.
Attachments:
1, Staff Report dated February 4, 2000
2. Minutes of February 9, 2000, CPZC Meeting (see LUPA report)
Distribution:
1. City Clerk
2. City Administrator
3. City Attorney
4. Planning Department File
5. Planning Department GIS Division
6. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after
Chambers in the Government Center at 151 4th Street SE.
7. Yaggy Colby Associates
7:00 p.m. on Monday, March 6, 2000 in the Council/Boar
%1
3 I
GDP #148
Badger Ridge
2,700' Notification Distance
Ward 3 (McConnell)
01 /20/00
V1:j'(MOM a�
1
i I I
a
i
,saw
<
9
I coase!.STtxOr,
I
A
,BADGER PROPERTY
Jill
APART OF SEGro, n o7N, R14w � � �' •
`• ROCNESYYR, OIMSTED COUNTY, MINNESOTA 95 t
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
k=
%0q r
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
City Planning and Zoning Commission
Brent Svenby, Planner
February 4, 2000
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507/285-8232
PLANNING
GISlADORESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGrHRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
507/285-8213
wELLJSEPTIC
507/285-8345
FAX
507/287-2275
General Development Plan #148 to be known as Badger Ridge
Planning Department Review:
Applicant:
Consultants:
Size and Location:
Badger Development, LLC
400 South Broadway #100
Rochester, MN 55904
Richard Badger
6004 Valleyhigh Road NW
Rochester, MN 55901
Yaggy Colby Associates
717 Third Avenue SE
Rochester, MN 55904
The area includes approximately 235.64 acres of land
located south of Valleyhigh Road NW, west of West
Circle Drive.
Existing Land Use: The site is presently use for agricultural proposes.
Proposed Use: The applicant is proposing to develop the area with
approximately 55 acres of commercial -industrial types
of uses, 40 acres of medium density uses and 124
acres of low density uses. The GDP also includes a
public park and a storm water detention ponds.
Land Use Plan: According to the Rochester Urban Service Area Land
Use Plan, the southwest comer of the intersection of
West Circle Drive (CR 22) and Valleyhigh Road NW
(CSAH 4) is shown as being designated for
approximately 16 acres of "Commercial" and 9 acres
of "Medium Density Residential" types of uses. The
rest of the land is identified for "Low Density
Residential' types of uses on the Rochester Urban
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2
ass '
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
Service Area Land Use Plan Map. The westerly most
80 acres is beyond the boundaries of the Rochester
Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. It is, however,
within the 25-year Urban Service Area for the City of
Rochester on the Olmsted County Future Land Use
Plan Map. Land Use Designations within this area
are considered to be "Low Density Residential'. A
petition to amend the Land Use Plan to designate
approximately 55 acres of "Commercial' and 40 acres
of "Medium Density" is being considered concurrent
with this GDP.
Zoning: The area of land between West Circle Drive and 50'"
Avenue is currently zoned A-4 (Agricultural Urban
Expansion) on the Olmsted Coun�Zoning Map. The
land shown on the west side of 50 Avenue is
currently zoned A-2 (Agricultural Protection District)
on the Olmsted County Zoning Map. The applicant
has filed annexation petitions, which include the entire
235 acres. Staff has recommended the property is
place in the H (Holding) zone upon annexation,
because of the zoning district amendments filed. A
Zone Change petition is being considered concurrent
with this application. The petition is to zone 55.34
acres to the M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial)
district, 40.17 acres to the R-3 (Medium Density
Residential) and 140.13 acres to R-2 (Low Density
Residential) district.
Streets: The GDP proposes a number of access locations to
the property. Two access locations are proposed
from Valleyhigh Road NW, two from West Circle
Drive and one from 501" Avenue NW. There is
number of local roadways proposed throughout the
GDP.
Sidewalks: Sidewalk and pedestrian paths will need to be
incorporated into the development of this property.
Drainage: The General Development Plan identifies existing
topography. The property generally drains to the
south.
Detailed grading and drainage plans will be required
when the property is platted.
Wetlands: Minnesota Statutes now require that all developments
be reviewed for the presence of wetlands or hydric
soils. According to the Olmsted County Soil Survey,
hydric soils exist on the property. The applicant is
responsible for identifying wetlands and obtaining the
necessary permits.
Public Utilities: The applicant has petitioned the City to do a feasibility
report for the extension of sewer and water to serve
Page 3
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
the property. The Northwest High Level water System
IS available to be extended to this property.
Preliminary computer water system modeling
indicates that fire flow to the proposed M-1 area are
below the minimums set by the Fire Prevention
Bureau for this type of use. These flows will increase
with the future planned networking elsewhere in the
system.
Parkland Dedication: The park and recreation department recommends
that the parkland dedication requirements for this
development be met through a combination of cash
and land. The plan as proposed does not show an
adequate amount of useable parkland that can be
developed for neighborhood park facilities. The park
and recreation department has met with the applicant
regarding the desired location for a park. Public
access is also needed to the parkland and there
should be at least a minimum of 180' of public street
frontage.
Referral Comments: 1. Rochester Public Works
2. Olmsted County Public Works Department
3. Planning Dept. - Transportation Division
4. Planning Dept. - Wetlands LGU
5. RPU Operations Division
6. RPU Water Division
7. Park and Recreation Department
8. Planning Department Addressing Division
9. Olmsted County SWCD
10. Fire Department
11. MnDOT
Report Attachments: 1. Location Map
2. Reduced Copy of General Development Plan
Maps
3. Referral Comments
4. Review of Traffic Analysis
Environmental Review: In accordance with the Minnesota Rules, 4410.4300
subp. 28 (D), the proposed development of this
property requires the preparation of a Mandatory
Environmental Assessment Worksheet since it
consists of the conversion of 80 or more acres of
agricultural land to a more intensive land use, i.e.
residential and commercial development.
Minnesota Rules, 4410.3100 states that a final
governmental decision to approve a project cannot be
made until there is a negative declaration on the need
for an Environmental Impact Statement issued by the
RGU, or an Environmental Impact Statement (if
required) is determined to be adequate.
At this time the applicant has submitted an EAW for
Page 4
General Deveiopment Plan
February 4. 2000
this property and will be acted on at a later date oy
the City Council.
Summary:
The GDP encompasses approximately 235 acres of land located south of Valleyhigh Road and
west of West Circle Drive. The applicant has petitioned to annex the entire 235 acres. A Land
Use Plan and Zone District Amendment are being reviewed concurrently with this GDP
application. The majority of the site is proposed to be developed with uses which are permitted in
the R-2 (Low Density Residential) district. A forty acre parcel is shown as being developed with
uses that are permitted in the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) district. The applicant is
proposing to develop the land adjacent to West Circle Drive with those uses that are permitted in
the M-1 (Mixed Commercial -Industrial) district. This type of development would be consistent with
what is approved for the property to the south.
The access locations shown along Valleyhigh Road and West Circle Drive are the locations of the
permitted access openings. A Traffic Impact Study was completed for the proposed Badger
Ridge GDP, The Transportation Staffs review of this report (see attached) indicates that their
position in planning for the development of the traffic system for this site has been to provide
future improvements that could respond to higher than expected levels of traffic. This will provide
the ability to respond if growth in the area or traffic generation at the site exceeds expectations.
The Review of the Traffic Analysis is divided into two sections: 1) Discussion of issues related to
the perimeter thoroughfare street system, 2) Discussion of issues related tot he internal
development layout of the site.
Based upon the Traffic Impact Study prepared for the applicant, this development in conjunction
with the anticipated development of other properties in the travelshed of Valleyhigh Road will
require the upgrading of Valleyhigh Road to fully accommodate future traffic demand. While there
is available capacity in the existing roadway system to accommodate some development
generated traffic, full build -out of the Badge Ridge site would cause the traffic volumes to exceed
the capacity of the existing roadway. The ultimate facility would likely include four through lanes
between West Circle Drive and 50` Ave., left and right turn lanes, along with necessary boulevard
or ditch area, potentially space for a median and space for a bike trail. It also appears that at
some point in the future the access location for the proposed commercial area would need to be
signalized. The first entrance, west of West Circle Drive, has inadequate sight distance for east
bound traffic approaching. A decision will need to be made whether this problem should be
corrected immediately. If it is, one option to consider as part of this project to improve capacity on
an interim basis would be to construct a center two-way left turn lane as part of the part. A
number of other improvements/modifications will be required to the adjacent roadways. For
example, 50" Avenue will need to be upgraded to a "collector" standard. The review lists a
number of conclusions regarding the development site.
The terrain of the site is rolling hilltops with some steep slopes. The applicant has indicated that
some extensive excavation will need to be done to provided relatively flat building areas in the
area proposed for commercial uses.
Staff did meet with the applicant and his consultant to review some changes to the GDP. These
changes are based on referral comments received. Some of the changes that the applicant
mentioned include providing a connection from the residential area to the commercial area,
revising the parkland location, and removing the lots that have frontage on 50" Avenue. The
applicant has indicated that he would like the full access opening, at the first access to West
Circle Drive south of Valleyhigh Drive, be closed creating a right -in, right -out access only. The
County highway Engineer will need to be contacted concerning this.
09 Page 5
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
Staff Suggested Findings and Recommendation:
Paragraph 61.215 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual lists the
criteria for approval of a general development plan (see attached section from the newly adopted
regulations, which became affective May 15, 1999).
Criteria A. The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan and zoning map, or that the means for reconciling any differences have
been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously with a rezoning or
plan amendment request.
A Land Use Plan amendment and Zoning District amendment are being
considered concurrent with this application. If the proposed amendments are
approved the proposed land uses would be consistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and zoning map. The westerly most 80 acres of site is
beyond the boundaries of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. it is
however, within the 25-year Urban Service Area for the City of Rochester on the
Olmsted County Future Land Use Plan Map. Land use designations within this
area are considered to be "Low Density Residential".
Criteria B. The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation
are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent
property.
The proposed development is compatible with the existing and/or permissible
future use of adjacent property. The Traffic Impact Study done for the
development does indicate traffic volumes exceeding the capacity of adjacent
roadways when full build -out occurs and the development of other properties
adjacent to these roadways. The review of the study indicates improvements and
modifications (now and in the future) are necessary to the adjacent roadways to
accommodate the projected traffic volumes. Additional access needs to be
provided to the 40 acres located in the SE corner of the intersection of Valleyhigh
Road and 50'" Avenue.
Criteria C. The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans
The proposed uses are consistent with the proposed land use designations for
the property if the land use amendments are approved. The R-2 and R•3 zoning
designation to allow for a mixture of housing types and densities.
Criteria D. The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and
streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6-Year Capital Improvement
Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation
Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City.
Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and
projected background traffic are compatible with the existing uses and uses
shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties.
Street system improvements within the immediate area which may be needed to
accommodate the proposed land use and projected background traffic include
upgrading Valleyhigh Road to fully accommodate future traffic demand and
upgrading 5e Avenue NW to a collector roadway. Timing and funding for these
projects will need to be determined, since they are not reflected in the current 6-
Page 6
q
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
year CIP or other plans. It maybe necessary to improve Valleyhigh Road on an
interim basis until the funding for the improvements is available.
Criteria E. On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the
development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will
provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those
adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance.
Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to
safely accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the
existing and proposed street system without creating safety hazards.
generating auto stacking that blocks driveways or intersections, or
disrupting traffic Flow on any street, as identified in the traffic impact
report, if required by Section 61.523(C). Capacity from improvements in
the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the assessment of
adequacy.
According to the staff analysis of the traffic impact study, Valleyhigh Road, 5d"
Avenue and West Circle will need to upgraded, improved andlor modified to be
able to carry the anticipated traffic volumes. There currently is available capacity
in Valleyhigh Road to accommodate some of the development traffic, but full
build -out of this property will cause the traffic volumes to exceed the capacity. it is
likely that the first entrance west of West Circle Drive will need to be signalized.
Negotiations will need to be conducted regarding cost contributions towards
needed traffic; management improvements including turn lanes, traffic control
measures, timing of improvement projects along Valleyhigh Road and 500
Avenue and needed outbound roadway widths. Access control will need to be
dedicated along internal street approached at certain intersections.
2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land
use, or that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities
to serve the area of the proposed development and such utilities are in
the first three years of the City's current 6-Year Capital Improvements
Program, or that other arrangements (contractual, development
agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to ensure that
adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If
needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed
development, the applicant for the development approval shall stipulate
to a condition that no development will occur and no further development
permit will be issued until concurrency has been evidenced.
Utilities will need to be extended to serve this development. The applicant has
petition the City to do a feasibility report on the extension of water sewer to serve
this property. The Northwest High Level water System is available to be
extended to this property. Preliminary computer water system modeling indicates
that tire Row to the proposed M-f area are below the minimums set by the Fire
Prevention Bureau for this type of use. These Rows will increase with the future
planned networking elsewhere in the system.
3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the level of
service standards in Section 64,130 and the proposed phasing plan for
development.
According to the traffic analysis, Valleyhigh Road and 500 Avenue do not have
adequate capacity to handle the complete build -out of this development and other
10 Page 7
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
developments. In order to accommodate this development and other properties,
modifications, improvements and/or reconstruction of roadways is necessary.
The GDP proposes storm water ponds on the property. The design, location and
size of storm water facilities will need to be designed to City standards.
Criteria F. The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices, or that, at the time of land
subdivision, a more detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to
solve unusual problems that have been identified.
Detailed grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted to the City for
review and approval. The design and placement of storm waterponds within this
development will need to be consistent with City standards.
Criteria G. The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for
residential development are consistent with the subdivision design standards
contained in Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned
development of adjacent parcels.
Specific lot and block layouts will be reviewed at the time the property is platted.
A roadway connecting the residential area to the commercial area is needed.
The proposed densities are compatible with existing and planned development of
adjacent properties. The GDP does provide connections to some of the adjacent
properties and allow for continued growth and development of those properties.
Recommendation:
Based on the above criteria, Staff would recommend approval of this General Development
Plan subject to the following conditions or modifications:
1. Approval of this GDP is contingent upon the Land Use Plan and Zoning District
Amendments being approved. If the land use designation and zoning classification
is different than what is shown on the GDP, the GDP will need to be revised to be
consistent with the approved zoning.
2. Storm water management must be addressed for this development. The proposed
plan shows on -site detention will be provided.
3. Prior the submittal of any plats for this development, issues regarding the required
right-of-way for Valleyhigh Road needs to be determined. Negotiations will need to
be conducted regarding cost contribution towards needed traffic management
improvements including turn lanes, traffic control measure and trail improvements.
This will require the applicant to work with the Olmsted County Engineer, the City
Engineer and the Transportation Division of the Planning Department.
4. Prior to the submittal of any plats for this development, decisions must be made
regarding the timing of Improvement projects along Valleyhigh Road and 50`"
Avenue. These decisions will include a determination of whether an interim
upgrade will be constructed or whether programming of the full corridor upgrade
should be initiated. This will require the applicant to work with the Olmsted County
Engineer, the City Engineer and the Transportation Division of the Planning
Department.
Page S
General Development Plan
February 4, 2000
5. Further evaluation of roadway cross sections on the approaches to the
intersections on Valleyhigh Road and West Circle Drive is needed prior to platting
to determine the needed outbound roadway widths.
6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines
the obligation of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm water
management, park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities and
contributions for public infrastructure (SACMAC, connection charges, etc.)
7. A wetland delineation for the site must submitted and approved by the LGU prior to
platting of the property. If development proposes to impact the wetlands,
appropriate permits must be secured from the LGU or the development design
must be revised to avoid those areas.
6. The GDP by revised to reflect the following modifications:
> Access control along the entire length of Vallhlgh Road, 50`" Avenue and
West Circle Drive except where the proposed roadways are located. Access
control be indicated along both sides of the internal street back to the First
east -west cul-de-sac at the first access location west of West Circle Drive and
250 feet back at the first access on West Circle Drive south of Valleyhigh
Road.
> A 10 foot trail facility along the south side on Valleyhigh Road, the east side of
50`" Avenue and the west side of West Circle Drive.
> A roadway connection from the residential area to the commercial area be
provided in order to minimize the need for local area traffic to circulate out
onto Valleyhigh Road for trips between these areas.
> The private lots taking direct access to 50'h Avenue be eliminated.
> Adequate parkland meeting the dedication requirements be provided.
> A roadway connection be provided from phase Ill to the 40 acres to the north.
> The right-of-way for 5e Avenue be shown at 120 feet.
> The required right-of-way needed for Valleyhigh Road. Right-of-way will need
to be determined by the County Engineer.
9. Prior to the approval of any final plats for the property, the EAW process needs to
be completed.
10. That revised copies of the GDP be provided to the Planning Department that
reflect all required modifications.
AIXROCH ER-OLMSTED COUNCIL OF GOVER cNTS /
2122 CAMPUS DRIVE S.E.
ROCHESTER, MN 55904-7996
PHONE 507.285.8232 FAX 507.287.2275
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 3, 2000
TO: City Planning & Zoning Commission / Common Council
FROM: Charles Reiter
Senior Transportation Planner - Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department
RE: Review of Traffic Analysis for Badger Ridge Development
A traffic impact study was completed for the proposed Badger Ridge development by the firm
Yaggy-Colby Associates. The study focused on the impact of traffic generated by the proposed
development on Valleyhigh Drive and the operations of proposed access points and
intersections along Valleyhigh Drive from West Circle Dr to 501" Ave. In addition to this
information, the transportation staff has reviewed the proposed development for consistency
with other transportation related requirements in the Land Development Manual.
The discussion in this memorandum will be divided into two sections:
1. Discussion of issues related to the perimeter thoroughfare street system (West
Circle Drive, Valleyhigh Drive and 50'h Ave)
2. Discussion of issues related to the internal development layout of the site
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES RELATED TO PERIMETER THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM
On the current Long Range Thoroughfare Plan West Circle Drive is designated as an
expressway, Valleyhigh Drive as an arterial street, and 50" Ave as a collector. No other
thoroughfare level streets abut or bisect the proposed development.
Our findings in regards to the perimeter thoroughfare system are:
This development in conjunction with anticipated development of other properties in
the travelshed of Valleyhigh Drive will require the upgrading of Valleyhigh Drive to
fully accommodate future traffic demand. The typical capacity of a two lane arterial
corridor is on the order of 9,000 to 11,000 vehicles per day. Current volumes are
approximately 3,000 vehicles per day. Projected Year 2015 volumes, assuming
development of Badger Ridge and other nearby properties fronting on Valleyhigh Dr
and 50'" Ave, and continued growth in background through traffic, will result in
estimated volumes of 22,000 to 24,000 vehicles per day immediately west of Circle
Drive, and approximately 15,000 immediately east of 50" Ave (See attached Figure
1). While there is available capacity in the existing roadway system to accommodate
some development generated traffic, full build -out of the Badger Ridge site by itself
would cause the traffic volumes to exceed the capacity of the existing roadway.
While the upgrading of Valleyhigh Drive is not required immediately, there is a need
to begin planning for the reconstruction project that will be needed in the future on
this corridor. This will include at this time establishing future right of way needs and
accommodating those needs in the General Development Plan, as well as
establishing cost sharing responsibilities for the various aspects of the road project.
While further evaluation will be necessary to establish final right of way needs, it
appears that from 35 to 50 additional feet of right of way may be required on each
a�3
side of the corridor to accommodate the needed arterial facility. The ultimate facility
will include four through lanes between West Circle Drive and 5V Ave, left and right
turn lanes, along with necessary boulevard or ditch area, potentially space for a
median, and space for a bike trail. The developer should work with the Olmsted
County Public Works Department to establish future right of way needs.
The need for turn lanes are dictated at the first access west of Circle Drive by the
anticipated volume of traffic generated by the proposed non-residential development
area in the plan. It also appears that at some point in the future this access location
will probably need to be signalized, though this would not occur until warrants are
met, which would only result once development occurs across Valleyhigh Drive and
east -west traffic flow through the intersection picks up. At the second access
location, the presence of four through lanes and turn lanes is beneficial because it
appears it would eliminate the need to signalize this location in the future. Without
four lanes or turn lanes, the anticipated level of service will be very poor.
Another factor contributing to need to reconstruct the corridor is the presence of
inadequate sight distance for eastbound traffic approaching the first entrance west
of Circle Drive. In consultation with the County Public Works Department a decision
will need to be made whether this problem should be corrected immediately. If it is,
one option to consider as part of this project to improve capacity on an interim basis
would be to construct a center two-way left turn lane as part of the project, which
would provide some added capacity (though not enough to meet ultimate needs)
and would push out further into the future the need to build the ultimate four lane
cross section. Given tight fiscal conditions in the County and City road budgets, this
may be an option to provide the more flexibility in budgeting for the major
reconstruction that will be needed.
➢ There is a need to upgrade 50'" Ave from a local street design to a collector street
design. This will require additional right of way along 50'" Ave in order to provide for
the needed roadway cross section, drainage and to accommodate a trail along the
corridor. The ultimate improvement will depend in part on the findings of a
Thoroughfare Plan updated now under study by the Planning Department, but at a
minimum it would probably be a three lane road section with a center two-way left
turn lane.
➢ There is a need to begin planning for eventual operational improvements that will be
needed at the intersection of West Circle Drive and Valleyhigh Drive as well as at
each of the access points to Valleyhigh Drive and the first development access on
West Circle Drive south of Valleyhigh Drive.
At the intersection of Circle Drive and Valleyhigh Drive, it appears that on the west
approach up to five east bound lanes and two westbound lanes may be needed in
the long term, and in order for this to reasonably match traffic lanes on the east side
there may need to be reconstruction on the east side of the intersection as well to
add turn lanes (which could include relocating the traffic signals, modifying drainage
and modifying the free flow right turn lanes)
At the first intersection west of Circle Drive (Intersection #4 in Figure 2), which
serves the proposed non-residential / multi family area, turn lanes need to be
provided initially to insure reasonable operation of this intersection. The intersection
serving the residential area (Intersection #3 in Figure 2) may operate reasonably well
under current conditions for a period of time, but eventually turn lanes will need to be
provided at this intersection also.
914
Along West Circle Drive, planning should be based on the assumption that the first
access opening south of Valleyhigh Drive (#6 on Figure 2) will not be signalized in
the future and if operating problems develop with left turns, the median will be
closed. It may be desirable to close the median at this time so as not to create any
false expectations on businesses that locate within Badger Ridge as to the
permanence of median access at that location.
> As is typical of all developments, the developer will be expected to provide needed
right of way and construction funding for left and right turn lanes as well as
contributing funds towards needed traffic management measures, which appear to
include traffic signals in the future at Intersection #4 on Figure 2.
> There is a need to plan for development a trail facilities along the entire perimeter of
the development. Trail facilities have been mapped along all of these corridors on
the ROCOG Long Range Bicycle Plan.
> Access control should be provided along the entire perimeter of the site except at
the designated public street intersections
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES RELATED TO THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT
OF THE SITE
Our comments in regards to the internal development layout are:
Access control should be planned at Intersection #4 along both sides of the internal street
back to the first east -west cul-de-sac. With the projected volume of traffic at build -out
expected at this intersection and the prospect of a future signal at the intersection with
Valleyhigh Drive, control of access will be needed to limit congestion that would otherwise
be caused by driveway traffic interacting with queuing traffic waiting to enter onto Valleyhigh
Drive
Access control should also be provided for a distance of 250' back at the first access off of
West Circle Drive south of Valleyhigh Drive (Intersection #6)
2. To minimize delay and possible congestion problems at the accesses to Valleyhigh Drive, it
is recommended that multi -lane northbound approaches be provided on all internal
roadways approaching Valleyhigh Drive. This would include consideration of a three lane
approach at Intersection #4 (separate left turn , through and right turn lanes), and a two
lane approach at the Intersection #3 (a left turn lane and combined through/right turn lane).
3. Internal access to park facilities should be identified on the plan
4. Given the traffic volumes that are anticipated on Valleyhigh Drive, staff would recommend
an internal connection be provided between the streets serving the R-2 and proposed non-
residential areas in order to minimize the need for local area traffic to circulate out onto
Valleyhigh Drive for trips between these areas. This would be particularly important if retail
or service uses are located in the proposed non-residential area which would be frequented
by residents of the area. Additionally, it appears from reviewing the peak hour traffic
numbers that the residential access (the 2n° access west of Circle Drive) will not have
sufficient side street traffic volumes to warrant a traffic signal at any time in the future. An
interconnection (or at least the ability to do so by setting aside a right of way or future
private street corridor) would insure that access to a signalized intersection could be
provided for residents of the area.
5. Staff would recommend that the lot layout immediately east of 50`" Ave be modified to
eliminate ail the private lots taking direct access to 50 Ave. A layout similar to that
ass
illustrated for the 40 acre tract directly to the north, utilizing east -west streets for private lot
frontage, should be considered.
Our concerns with the layout as proposed are:
> The rolling topography and grades along 50'h Ave create minimal acceptable sigiht
distance conditions. It is our conclusion that having private lots fronting onto 50' Ave will
create potential safety problems due to the fact that motorists will not be clearly see the
driveway traffic these lots create very far in advance, and thus will not be expecting slow
moving traffic in and out of driveways as they travel through the corridor.
> Potential sight distance problems will be exacerbated by the fact that with the reservoir
to the south there will be open space areas adjacent to 50'" Ave with little side street
traffic conflict, which will likely result in motorists driving faster than any posted speed
limit that would be established on this corridor. The resulting speeds of motorists driving
through the corridor are unlikely to be compatible with residential driveway traffic.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Prior to platting issues regarding right of way needs to allow for the ultimate cross section of
Valleyhigh Drive and 50'h Ave will need to be identified
2. Negotiations will need to be conducted regarding cost contribution towards needed traffic
management improvements including turn lanes, traffic control measures, and trail
improvements
3. Prior to final platting decisions should be made regarding the timing of improvement
projects along Valleyhigh Drive and 50"' Ave. These decisions include a determination of
whether an interim upgrade will be constructed or whether programming of the full corridor
upgrade should be initiated
4. Trail facilities should be provided along all perimeter roadways
5. Access control should be shown along all private lots abutting Valleyhigh Drive and West
Circle Drive
6. Access control along internal street approaches to Intersection #4 and #6 should be shown
7. Internal park access should be shown
8. Further evaluation of roadway cross sections on the approaches to intersection #3, #4 and
#6 may be needed prior to development of final street improvement plans to determine
needed outbound roadway widths
9. The lot layout for the 40 acres abutting the east side of 50'" Ave should be modified to
eliminate lots with direct frontage on 50'" Ave.
"i
k•-i (�.
rrZn
y.
Ln tO LO
N
}
M CN 0
,i
®t
�ts
w
lit
®_
N
t:
o
u
o
2
w
C
m
n
p
u
0
t
'
—a,
C
mF,a
la
a
m
u
o
a
m
m
W
a
H
�
e
w
5
N
IL
O
0
Z
Wf�too
i
�
r
�
W
r
L
M
ai
=
3
�
�
m
d
in
wain
E
�
m
o
a
«
!
C
go
=wo
'Di
a
44
�-
_
C
w
=
r
m
='"'
a
u
c
w
W
W
F
IX
Ep
Ir=
co
N N III- Umu
Q> MIx Q
ZW QOO
$ 0. -�- LUN �-V<
W W W
W
� -F
r N
O
Ali ROCHESTER
Minnesota
2/24/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
*REVISED 2124I00*
DEPARTMENT OF PUBL1C
WORKS
201 4m Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287.7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for General
Development Plan #148 on the BADGER Development LLC (Badger Ridge)
property. The following are Public Works comments on the proposal:
Storm Water Management must be addressed for this development.
As proposed by the GDP, on -site detention will be provided. Both of
the proposed detention ponds appear to serve more than 50 acres of
developable area within the proposed development. Under current
City policy, stormwater facilities serving more than 50 acres are
required to be dedicated to the City (cost of construction is the
responsibility of the developer). All required stormwater facilities must
be constructed concurrent with the initial stages of this development.
The property should be encouraged to participate in the City's regional
Stormwater management plan. The regional pond to serve this
property has already been constructed downstream of the Badger
Property.
2. Controlled access must be provided along the entire length of 501h Ave
NW, Valleyhigh Rd NW, & West Circle Drive, with the exception of the
street accesses that are approved through the GDP. Additional
controlled access will be required within 200 feet from the right of way
intersections of the proposed roads with all existing roadways.
Additional access control maybe required through platting.
3. Staff would suggest that the proposed access to West Circle Drive,
located approximately 950 feet north of the south property line, be
limited to right in and right out only, or eliminated completely. This
issue will be decided by the ROCOG Access Management Study
currently in process.
C:ITEMPSGOP 148Rev2-00.doc
ROCHESTER
Minnesota
2'24/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
'REVISED 2/24/00'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4' Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904.3740
507.287.7800
FAX — 507.281-6216
4. Right turn lanes will be required from Valleyhigh Drive NW (CSAH #4).
5. Dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way will be required for each half of
50.. Ave NW.
Pedestrian facilities will be required along both sides of all new public
roads, and along all existing rights -of -way. Construction of a 10 foot
bike path will be required, as shown on the GDP along the south side
of Valleyhigh Road NW, the east side of 50'h Ave NW, and the west
side of West Circle Drive (Cnty Rd 22) concurrent with the platting and
development of these corridor frontages.
7. Easements shall be provided by the owner for off -site utilities.
8. Routing of sanitary sewer lines will be reviewed further in the platting
stages.
9. Execution of a City / Owner Contract will be required prior to
construction of public infrastructure.
10.The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City
that outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited
to, stormwater management, park dedication, traffic improvements,
pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication, and contributions for
public infrastructure.
11. Development utilizing a single access will be limited to 1200 trips until
a second access is provided.
CATEMP\GDP 148Rev2-00.doc
00 ROCHESTER
Minnesota
11214r 00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
'REVISED 2/24/00"
r
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4" Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904.3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
12.A bike path and pedestrian access shall be provided via right-of-way to
the park indicated in Phase III.
13.The alignment of the intersection immediately north of the most
northerly point of the proposed park should be revised.
14.This GDP should require re -opening of 501h Ave NW to 19w St NW.
15.The property that has recently been acquired by the applicant, from
Olmsted County, abutting West Circle Drive immediately southeast of
the current GDP boundary should be included in this GDP.
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property
(rates are subject to annual review and change:
•:• Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) @ $1605.50 per dev. acre.
•:• Water Availability Charge (WAC) @ $1605.50 per developable acre.
•:• Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division.
❖ Storm Water Management Fee (if on -site detention is not provided).
C• A proportional share of the cost of reconstructing 50th Ave NW.
C:ITEMPtG0P I48Rev2-00.doc
;81
February 1, 2000
Suzanne LaPalm
Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Dear Suzanne:
The Public Works Department has reviewed General
LLC to be known as Bad
comments:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
507/285-8231
�lopment Plan #148 b
and has the following
1. With this proposed development, CSAH 4 will need to be improved to
a 4 lane facility with right and left turn lanes. Additional right of way
with access control will be required dependent upon the roadway
typical on CSAH 4 including a bike path.
2. At the intersection of CSAH 4 & 22 right of way shall be shown for a
free flow leg as constructed on east side of intersection.
3. Intersection and signal modifications will be required at the
intersection of CSAH 4 & 22. Participation in intersection and signal
reconstruction will be required. Adequate sight distance will be
required at all public street intersections.
Sincerely,
%Jl{G�Zalx/�rC���u�V
Michael Sheehan
County Engineer
MTS:ss
AN ECUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Administration Building Maintenance Surveying and Mapping Engineenng Highway Maintenance Parks & Agncudura Solid Waste
rocheeter
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ROCHESTER PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMEN'
MEMORANDUM
February 11, 2000
Suzanne LaPalm
Planning
Badger Ridge General Development Plan #148
'REVISION DATED 02/07/00`
The 235 acre proposed development will have parkland dedication requirements of
approximately 20.0 acres. The actual amount of dedication cannot be determined until the
total number of dwelling units is known. Parkland dedication is required for only the
residential area of the development. Dedication should be in the form of land and cash
in lieu of land.
The revised plan indicates adequate parkland for neighborhood park purposes. As
shown on the plan, the applicant has agreed to provide ± 8.0 acres of land at 4% or less
grade. The applicant and project consultant have verbally indicated a willingness to
consider extension of stormwater piping through portions of the designated park so that
the developable park area is not bisected by drainage ways.
Land owned by the Joint Powers Board and located south of Phase III parcel may
eventually be developed for neighborhood and regional recreational facilities. This land
is currently leased for use as a tree disposal site.
N:\PARK\DSTOTZ\ZDOD\DEDICATION\NW 2898\BADGER RIDGE GOP.DOC
rpuWe ;Ve
a �3
February 15, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANIN'ING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: REVISED: General Development Plan #148 by Badger Development, LLC to be
known as Badger Ridge.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced general development plan is complete and our comments follow:
1. The Northwest High Level Water System is available for connection near the northeast
comer of the M-1 area and will be available at the southeast comer with the construction of
the planned Circle 19 Plaza.
2. Preliminary computer water system modeling indicates that fire flows to the M-1 area at this
time will be below the minimums set by the Fire Prevention Bureau for this type of use. The
modeling also indicated that initially the fire flows for the R-3 and the church areas are
marginal depending on the building types and sizes in this area. The flows will however
increase to both of these areas with future planned networking elsewhere in the system. The
fire flows in the R-2 areas will be adequate with the current system.
3. The water system in this area will need to be looped wherever possible including the cul-de-
sacs to create a network capable of providing adequate fire flows and water quality. We will
work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours, p Cbµ
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
Yaggy Colby Associates
Badger Development, LLC
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542
mq mw
aLL-MffAIG CM
V
ROCHESTER
DATE: January 26, 2000
����iarceaa�a
TO: Suzanne LaPalm, Planning
From: Lyle Felsch, Deputy Chief
V.',........
D. GL ii.a.
DAVID A. KAPLER. Chief
Rochester Fire Deoa=ent
201 4th Street SE. Room 10
Rochester. P.1N 55904-3726
(507) 265-8072
FAX 9(507) 285-8256
Subj: General Development Plan #148, Badger Ridge, located west of West Circle
Drive and south of Valleyhigh Road NW.
This project will add over 400 residential lots and 20 commercial lots on 235 acres that
is a full 2 minutes beyond the 4 minute response time standard of the Rochester Fire
Department and will increase the departments fire and life safety responses. For this
reason fire protection issues for this project are of critical concern.
With that regard, the fire department has the following requirements:
An adequate water supply shall be provided for fire protection including hydrants
properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water
Division. Hydrants shall be in place prior to commencing building construction.
The initial water supplies modeled by RPU will be in the area of 1500 GPM, which is
sufficient for residential occupancies only. The water supplies required for fire
protection of the commercial portion of this project along West Circle Dr., will require
the water main connection near 50`h Avenue NW and 55 h Street NW to be
completed prior to construction of commercial structures at the higher elevation.
Fire department, access streets and roadways shall be as provided in accordance
with the fire code, RCO 31 and the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development
Manual including approved cul-de-sac dimensions and street widths. All fire
department access roadways shall be serviceable prior to and during building
construction.
All street, directional and fire lane signs must be in place prior to occupancy of any
residential buildings.
4. All buildings are required to display the proper street address number on the
building front, which is plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the
property.
c: Donn Richardson, RPU, Water Division
Yaggy Colby Assoc. 717 3r0 Avenue SE, Rochester, Mn. 55904
Badger Development LLC, 400 South Broadway, Rochester, Mn. 55904
ags'
1 / 11,2000
YCA #6753
BADGER RIDGE
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Badger Ridge is approximately 253 acres bounded by Valleyhigh Road NW to the north,
unplatted land to the west, West Circle Drive to the east, and Hartman Farms to the south.
The following is a written summary of the General Development Plan (GDP) in
accordance with Appendix B E-3.
a) Topographic or soils conditions which, in the estimation of the applicant, may
create potential problems in street, drainage, public utilities or building design
and construction, and how these problems will be investigated further or
engineered to overcome the limitations.
The attached GDP shows the area under consideration. The Olmsted County Soil
Survey indicates shallow bedrock on this site on the steep slopes to the east. As
indicated by the street alignments, we are avoiding these steeper areas of potential
bedrock. Soil borings will be completed during the engineering phases to
determine subsurface conditions and the bedrock depth (if it is shallow) in the
areas of construction. Hydric soils are indicated on the Soil Survey, in the
bottom of the waterway through Phase III.
b) Storm drainage problems which, in the estimation of the applicant, may result in
costs that will exceed normal storm drainage costs.
The storm drainage does not appear to cause problems that will result in the
increase of normal costs. Two ponds will be established to limit the run-off from
the site.
c) Identification of potential off -site drainage problems.
The applicant will construct detention ponds at the downstream side of the
subdivision. There should be no problems with off -site drainage created by this
development
d) Availability of utilities to serve the area under consideration.
Water main is available from a casing stubbed under West Circle Drive and from
the water main in the Hartman Farms area. Sanitary sewer for Phase I and II
Verna Badger Parcel 1 will come from the West Circle Drive right-of-way south
of the site. Sewer for Phase III and IV will come from the future sewer extending
from the south along 50' Avenue NW.
ru Badger Ridge
General Development Plan
Page 2
e) Identification of possible erosion problems which may arise in the estimation of
the applicant.
The areas of steeper slopes will be avoided where possible. The majority of these
areas are shown on the GDP in the rear of lots and will not be graded. Where
development encroaches into the steeper slopes, erosion control measures will be
incorporated into the grading plan during final design.
fj A general statement as to the possible phasing of any development activity to
occur on the property under the control of the applicant.
The first phase will include the M-1 area, the Verna Badger Parcel 1, and the
North Half of Phase II. The remaining half of Phase II is planned for 2001 and
Phases III and IV after sewer is available from the south.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ORIGINATING DEPT:
PLANNING
i i EM DESCRIPTION: General Development Plan #149 Hidden Oaks Valley
February 22,2000
MEETING a$07 '
DATE: 2-6-00
ITEM NO.
i-9 11
REPARED BY:
Mitzi A. Baker,
NOTE., (1) Staff recommends that the City Council continue this item until the General Development Plan is revised
and re -submitted. Revisions will need to be submitted with adequate time to allow the Departments to review them
prior to Council action.
(2) After the Planning Commission meeting, the County Board approved amendments to the County Land Use Plan
that include this property. Amendments to the 25 year Urban Service Area result in all of the undeveloped portions
of this property being within the 25 year Urban Service Area. Since this decision has been made, the Council may
want to remove the language "if platted within the City", from the third bullet under condition #1.
City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
Motion by Schultze, seconded by Stever to approve GDP #149 with the following conditions and modifications, motion
carried 7-0.
The GDP be revised to;
• Identify the future alignment of Bendel Rd. NW with a 90' intersection with the future collector road;
• Provide a 30' wide mid -block pedestrian connection along the south side of the most southerly east -west roadway,
unless determined to be topographically unfeasible by the City Engineer;
• Re -label the area currently shown for " future commercial development". That area shall be labeled: "existing land use
Low Density Residential (potential future commercial use permitted within Low Density Residential land use
designation)".
• Identify future pedestrian trails along the east side of Sandal Rd. NW and the south side of the future cotlector road;
• Show the "66' Future Access and Utility Easement" as public right-of-way to the north property line, which will be
dedicated at the time of platting, if platted within the City;
• Minimize access to the future collector road by re -aligning the most southerly east -west road so that it intersects with
the stubbed roadway leading south from the future collector, or so that it intersects with the northisouth roadway
located north of the future collector, and, at the extreme southeast corner of the property, timiting accesses to the
Collector road to two intersections in the southeast corner that will be platted with subdivision lots;
The revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department.
2. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the obligations of the applicant relating
to, but not limited to, storm water management, park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way
dedication, and contributions for public infrastructure.
3. At the time of platting, controlled access must be provided along Sandal Road, with the exception of the public road shown
on the GDP, and also within 50' of the intersection with Bandel Road, consistent with an access study being completed for
that roadway. At the time of platting, controlled access shall be provided along the right-of-way for the road labeled "future
65m Street", consistent with an access study being completed for that roadway. When platted, the area shown as the "66'
future access and utility easement" shall be dedicated as public right -of --way to the north property line.
4. Roadway names shown on the GDP may not meet the roadway naming standards of the LDM. The applicant shall coordinate
with the City and Planning Department G/S staff to determine appropriate roadway naming designations.
5. in order to provide adequate water supply for this development, the development will either need to be timed so that the NW
High Level Water System is available to this property concurrent with infrastructure improvements on -site. Or, a temporary
booster pump station shelf be installed by the developer to improve water service to the property and the station be
removed at the time the NW High Level System is made available.
.:OUNCIL ACTION: Motion
Second
0
MI A Aji/l �
7*0
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Planner
DATE: February 4, 2000
r
pr�Ri TFDy IGI �T"N
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
5071285-8232
PLANNING
GIS)ADDRESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSING/HRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
5071285-8213
WELL1SEPTIC
507/285-8345
FAX
507/287-2275
RE: General Development Plan #149 to be known as Hidden Oaks
Valley
Planning Department Review:
Applicant/Owner:
Consultants:
Summary:
Big DE Development
PO Box 247
Byron, MN 55920
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
1648 Third Ave. SE
Rochester, MN 55904
This property is located east Bandel Road NW, near 651° St. NW. A GDP for this property was
approved by the County in May 1999 that included 160 acres. The large lots shown at the very
northern and northeastern portions of the property have been platted in the County. When the
County approved the GOP, the alignment of a future collector road had not been studied.
ROCOG has since initiated the process to amend the Long Range Thoroughfare Plan to identify
a future collector road extending east from Bandel Rd. NW at 650 St. NW to 1811' Ave. NW. This
GDP identifies the future alignment of this roadway, as it will be planned through this property and
includes approximately 101.5 acres of land.
Environmental Review: At the time the County reviewed the GDP for this property, it was
noted that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) would need to be completed for the
development of this property. In accordance with the Minnesota Rules, 4410.4300 subp. 36, the
proposed development of this property would require preparation of a Mandatory Environmental
Assessment Worksheet since it consists of the conversion of 80 or more acres of agricultural land
to a more intensive land use, i.e. residential and potentially commercial development. At this
time, an EAW has not bee submitted to the Planning Department for this property
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITYlAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Staff Suggested Findings and Recommendation:
Paragraph 61.215 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual lists the
criteria for approval of a general development plan (see attached section from the newly adopted
regulations, which became affective May 15, 1999.
Criteria A. The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan and zoning map, or that the means for reconciling any
differences have been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously
with a rezoning or plan amendment request.
The portion of the GDP showing tow density residential development is
consistent with the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan designation for
this area which is "low density residential". The portion of the site labeled "future
commercial development" is not consistent with the Land Use Plan.
Criteria B. The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation
are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent
property.
The density and lot sizes for the residential portion of the property appear
consistent with the land use designation and the R-f zoning of the property
already annexed into the City.
The GDP should be revised to reflect the future re -alignment of Bendel Rd. NW
showing a 900 intersection with the future collector road (labeled 6e St. NW),
Pedestrian facilities also need to be reflected on the Plan and should be shown
along Bendel Rd. NW and the future collector road. Sidewalk will also be
required along both sides of all new roads. It should be noted that the future
collector road will not likely be named 65'0 St. NW and should not be shown as
such on the GDP.
A portion of the GDP is labeled "future single family development 18-54 lots".
The ability to serve this area with municipal services will impact the density. A
cul-de-sac within this area will need to be platted with right -of --way to the north
property line at the time of platting.
Criteria C. The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans
The development density is consistent with a Low Density Residential land use
designation of the Land Use Plan and is consistent with the Housing Plan and
the standards for the physical and social environments of residential
neighborhoods. The whole GDP, including that portion already platted in the
County, provides for varied lot sizes for single family detached homes.
Criteria D. The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and
streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6-Year Capital Improvement
Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation
Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City.
Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and
projected background traffic are compatible with the existing uses and uses
shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties.
P
The GDP identifies a needed future collector road that will extend east from
Bandel Rd. NW, at fist° St. NW, to 18'6 Ave. NW. ROCOG has imfiated the
process to amend the Long Range Thoroughfare Plan to identify this collector
road.
The GDP will need to be revised to identify a pedestrian system along both
Bandel Rd. NW and 65" St. NW.
Criteria E. On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the
development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will
provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those
adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance.
Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to safely
accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the existing and
proposed street system without creating safety hazards, generating auto stacking
that blocks driveways or intersections, or disrupting traffic flow on any street, as
identified in the traffic impact report, if required by Section 61.523(C). Capacity
from improvements in the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the
assessment of adequacy.
A portion of the GDP is labeled "future single family development 18-54 lots" A
cul-de-sac within this area will need to be platted with right-of-way to the north
property line at the time of platting.
The GOP should be revised to reflect the future re -alignment of Bandel Rd. NW
showing a 900 intersection with the future collector road (labeled 6f St NW).
Pedestrian facilities also need to be reflected on the Plan and should be shown
along Bendel Rd. NW and the future collector road
2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land use, or
that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities to serve the area
of the proposed development and such utilities are in the first three years of the
City's current 6-Year Capital Improvements Program, or that other arrangements
(contractual, development agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to
ensure that adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If
needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed development, the
applicant for the development approval shall stipulate to a condition that no
development will occur and no further development permit will be issued until
concurrency has been evidenced.
Sewer is available at Bendel Rd. NW and will be extended to serve the area of the
Plan which shows urban sized single family lots. The area lying north and east of
these lots may need to be served by another line which would be extended to this
property from the VOA props located south and east of this site (at the
intersection of 5e St. NW and 1r Ave. NW).
Water service to the site is currently limited. In order to provide adequate pressure
for domestic use, the Northwest High Level Water System will need to be extended
to this property from the Orchard Ridge development on the west side of TH 52. An
alternate option, approved by RPU Water, is the installation of a temporary booster
pump station that would be removed at the time the higher pressure from the NW
High Level System is made available.
a�3
3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the evel of service
standards in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for development.
The GDP proposes a storm water detention facility within the area labeled as
"future open space". The location, size and design of these facilities will require
further review.
Detailed construction plans will need to be approved for all infrastructure
improvements.
The GDP will need to be revised to identify pedestrian facilities along Sandal Rd.
NW and the future collector road. Sidewalk will be required along both sides of ail
new roadways. The design of the single family urban lots and roads shown along
the south property boundary results in a 985' long block with no mid -block
pedestrian connections. A 30' pedestrian easement should be provided within this
block to provide for pedestrian connections between this development and future
development on the adjacent property, consistent with Section 64.227, A of the
LDM.
Re -alignment of Bandel Rd. NW to intersect with the future collector road at 9e
should also be reflected on a revised Plan.
A 40 acre park/school site is located south and east of this site. Park dedication
requirements for this development should be met via cash dedication in lieu of
land.
Criteria F. The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through
normal engineering and construction practices, or that, at the time of land
subdivision, a more detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to
solve unusual problems that have been identified.
The GDP proposes a storm water detention facility north of the area that
identifies urban single family lots. The location, size and design of this facility will
require further review.
Criteria G. The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for
residential development are consistent with the subdivision design standards
contained in Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned
development of adjacent parcels.
The design of the single family urban lots and roads shown along the south
property boundary results in a 985' long block with no mid -block pedestrian
connections. A 30' pedestrian easement should be provided within this block to
provide for pedestrian connections between this development and future
development on the adjacent property, consistent with Section 64, 227, A of the
LDM.
A portion of the GDP is labeled "future single family development 18-54 lots".
The ability to serve this area with municipal services will impact the density. A
cul-de-sac within this area will need to be platted with right-of-way to the north
property line at the time of platting.
The GOP will need to be revised to eliminate the "future commercial
development designation since the property is not designate for commercial
uses on the Land Use Plan. The other option is to label that area for "non-
residential uses permitted in a low density land use designation" since that
#ay
location may meet the site location criteria for some non residential uses in the
low density residential zoning districts.
An open space area was shown on the original GDP for this property, in part
because of development limitations dictated by topography and limited ability to
serve that area with City services. The original GDP did not include the future
collector road, now identified on the Plan. Staff questions whether the area
designated for "future open space"is an appropriate designation given the
infrastructure facilities that will abut the property in the future. The applicant and
consultant should consider the infrastructure planned to abut this property in the
future and determine whether development of a portion of that property would be
possible as a result of this change.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff has reviewed this GDP according to the applicable regulations and criteria and recommends
the following conditions or modifications:
1. The GDP be revised to:
• Identify the future alignment of Bendel Rd. NW with a 900 intersection with the future
collector road;
• Provide a 30' wide mid -block pedestrian connection along the south side of the most
southerly east -west roadway;
• Re -label the area currently shown for "future commercial developmenP. That area
shall either be labeled "non residential uses permitted within a low density residential
land use designation" or "low density residential", consistent with the Land Use Plan
designation for this property;
• Identify future pedestrian trails along the east side of Bandel Rd. NW and the south
side of the future collector road;
• Show the "66' Future Access and Utility Easement" as public right-of-way to the north
property line, which will be dedicated at the time of platting;
• Minimize access to the future collector road by re -aligning the most southerly east -
west road so that it intersects with the stubbed roadway leading south from the future
collector, at the extreme southeast corner of the property;
The revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department.
2. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the
obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, stormwater management,
park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication,
and contributions for public infrastructure.
3. At the time of platting controlled access must be provided along the right-of-way for
the future 65° St. NW and also along Bandel Rd. NW, with the exception of the one
public road access shown on the GDP. When platted, the area shown as the "66'
Future Access and Utility Easement" shall be dedicated as public right-of-way to the
north property line.
4. Roadway names shown on the GDP may not meet the roadway naming standards of
the LDM. The applicant shalt coordinate with the City and Planning Department GIS
staff to determine appropriate roadway naming designations.
5. in order to provide adequate water supply for this development the development will either
need to be timed so that the NW High Level Water System is available to this property
concurrent with Infrastructure improvements on -site. or, a temporary booster pump station
shall be installed by the developer to Improve water service to the property and the station be
removed at the time the NW High Level System Is made available.
aq4
FROM: Planning Department. Transportation Division
Ciry Prel Plat 99• The final plat for this subdivision should have a no access restnccon
48 included on the west side of Lot 1 of Block 1 and Lot 13 of Block 4
Bandel North
First Outlot B should be either dedicated as right of way or a condition sr.owd
be included in the Development Agreement that will accompany
development of this subdivision to the effect that if the City determines to
proceed with the construction of 65"h St Outlot B will be deeded to city for
right of way purposes. The standard policy of the city is to require
dedication of local and collector street right of ways as part of the plat
approval process.
c y GDP 149
Hidden Oaks
Valley
The main issue in regards to this General Development Plan is the
identification of a future corridor to allow for the extension of 651h St.
eastward from Bandel Road to 18'h Ave. The need for this corridor has
been identified through on -going discussions and review of street systems
needs in the area. The corridor addresses two key needs:
As a general rule of thumb, typically urban development intensities
require collector andlor arterial streets to be providing on or about %:
mile spacings in order to provide an adequate amount of major street
capacity (thus relieving traffic from local streets) and to provide
adequate overall connectivity. Prior to this time north of 551" St. there
have been no major east -west streets planned. In part this was a
response to the thought that urban intensity development would not
extend north of where a 65°i St. extension would be located. However,
with the urban growth boundary expansion being discussed it appears
that urban intensity development will extend further north and
infrastructure accommodations need to be planned for.
2. A second concern is that with a planned overpass of TH 52 at 65`0 St.
envisioned as the minimum improvement at that intersection, there is
the potential for additional traffic from the west side of TH 52 being
funneled into the intersection of the Bandel Rd/East Frontage Rd and
55ch St. The extension of 65'h St. to 18`h Ave. will reduce this impact
and relieve the level of congestion that would otherwise occur there by
providing for a better overall dispersion of traffic throughout this area.
ROCOG has initiated the process to amend the Long Range Thoroughfare
Plan to reflect the extension of 651h St. as a collector street between
Bendel Road and 18`h Ave. The City has retained the firm of McGhie &
Betts to evaluated alternative alignments for the 65'h St. corridor. Their
preliminary analysis has been reviewed with the staffs of City and County
Public Works, MnOOT and Planning's transportation staff. Of the
alternatives evaluated, which included corridors that would have went
south of the Hidden Oaks area, the corridor reflected on the plan appears
to provide the most logical location in terms of road alignment, function
and minimizing the division of current property ownerships. When this
alignment leaves the Hidden Oaks site heading eastward there are some
alternative options which are being reviewed with landowners, which
include the School District and Park Department on a 40 acre site
The one change or modificationto the General Development Plan that is
recommended would be for the GDP to reflect the future need to align
Bendel Road in a direct north -south alignment along the west property line
all the way to the proposed 65'" St. alignment. This realignment is
recommended in order to create a cleaner, 900 intersection with the future
65`" St. and a potential extension of Bandel Road to the north and to
provide additional spacing between the end of any bridge structure over
the highway and the first intersecting street.
M9 ROCHESTEtt
Minnesota
212100
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
REVISED 2/2/00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 40 Street BE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for General Development
Plan #149.on the Big DE (Hidden Oaks Valley) property. The following are Public Works
comments on the proposal:
Storm Water Management must be addressed for this development. On -site
detention is shown on the proposed GDP plan. Any on -site stormwater
facilities serving 50 developable acres or less will remain private, and
execution of a long term maintenance & ownership agreement will be
required. All required private stormwater facilities must be constructed
concurrent with the initial stages of development.
2. Controlled access must be provided along the right-of-way for the future 65'h
St NW, as
determined by the City Engineer. Controlled access will also be required
along Sande] Rd NW with the exception of the single proposed access right-
of-way. Additional controlled access will be required for private driveways
within 50 feet from the intersections of any new road(s) with 500 Ave NW, or
Bendel Rd NW.
3. The connection shown as "66' Future Access & Utility Easement", between
the north/south cul-de-sac should be shown as public right-of-way and
dedicated at the time of platting.
4. Developer agrees to dedicate the needed right of way for 651h street NW,
estimated to be 120.00 feet total (60 feet each side of centerline)
"tWN-
5. Pedestrian facilities will be required along both sides of all new public roads
abutting this property, and along all the east side of Bendel Rd NW. A 10 foot
bituminous bike path may be required, along the east side of Bendel Rd NW,
/
C:ITEMPIGOP149.doc
ROCHESTEtt
Minnesota
?:'_r00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4" Street BE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
7. Specific routing of sanitary sewer lines will be reviewed further during the
platting stages.
8. Execution of a City / Owner Contract will be required prior to construction of
public infrastructure.
9. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that
outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to,
stormwater management, park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian
facilities, right-of-way dedication, and contributions for public infrastructure.
10. The alignment of the easterly street shown intersecting 65'"St NW, should be
revised to connect with the easterly north/south street instead of 651" St NW.
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property
(rates are subject to annual review and change):
:• Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) ® $1605.50 per
developable acre.
Water Availability Charge (WAC) Q $1605.50 per developable acre.
A proportional share of the costs to reconstruct Bandel Road NW, aw
iaseas#astC5`" St f+AA{.
Sanitary Sewer & Water Connection Charges for the frontage along
Bandel Road.
Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division.
CATEMPtGDP149.d0c
*PU
we dledye, we deliver
January 28, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester. MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: General Development Plan #149 by Big DE Development to be known as Hidden
Oaks Valley, which is the Bandel North area.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced general development plan is complete and our comments follow:
1. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments. The
Land Development Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department determines the
applicability of these fees.
2. The majority of this property is serviceable from the Northwest High Level Water System, which
is currently available approximately one mile to the west at the North Park Water Tower. There
are preliminary plans however to extend this water system to the east with the Orchard Ridge
Development and a feasibility study has been prepared by the City Public Works Department to
bring it the balance of the way to serve this area.
3. The other option that has been discussed and approved by us is the installation of a temporary
booster pump station by the developer to provide adequate pressure for domestic use and a
limited amount of water available for fire protection. This would then be removed at the time the
higher pressure from the NW High Level System was made available.
4. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout
to serve this area.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
C" p
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
Big DE Development
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542
�LL_V"CA' ROCHESTER
uzrLe�a�a
Sol
D-AL G Lil'� ,
DAVID A. KAPLER, Chief
Rochester Fire Department
201 4th Street SE. Room 10
Rochester, MN 55904-3726
(507)285-8072
FAX #(507) 285-8256
DATE: January 28, 2000
TO: Suzanne LaPalm, Planning
From: Lyle Felsch, Deputy Chief
Subj: General Development Plan 99-149, Hidden Oaks Valley., located east side of
Bandel North First Subd, in cascade Township adjacent to the City of Rochester..
The majority of this project is outside of the City of Rochester and will receive fire
protection as contracted with Cascade township. The portion within the city is beyond
the 4 minute fire response standard of the Rochester Fire Department and will will add
66 single family residential lots on 28.66 to the in -city response area of the Rochester
Fire Department. The following are the requirements of the fire code:
1. An adequate water supply shall be provided for fire protection including hydrants
properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water
Division. Hydrants shall be in place prior to commencing building construction.
The submittal does not address water supplies for the township portion, so it is
assumed fire protection water will be tanked to the site by the fire department.
Due to the close proximity to the Bandel Water tank (not a tower), the portion within
the city presently has marginal water pressures and booster pump(s) may be
necessary to insure adequate fire protection water supplies. Refer to comments
from Donn Richardson, RPU Water Division.
Fire department, access streets and roadways shall be as provided in accordance
with the fire code, RCO 31 and the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development
Manual including approved cul-de-sac dimensions and street widths. All fire
department access roadways shall be serviceable prior to and during building
construction.
3. All street, directional and fire lane signs must be in place prior to occupancy of any
residential buildings.
se 7
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9, 2000
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
General Development Plan #149 by Big DE Development to be known as Hidden Oaks
Valley. The County approved a GDP for this property in May 1999 that included 160
acres of land. a portion of which would be developed in the City and a portion which
Ms. Baker presented the General Development Plan staff report, dated February 4, 2000, to the
Commission. The Staff report is on fife at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department.
Ms. Baker presented a map of the GDP and stated that the County approved a GDP for a
Portion of the property last year. She stated that at that time, the future alignment of a Collector
or Arterial road that will connect from Bandel Road to 18'h Avenue NW hadn't been established
and it prompted the City to have McGhie & Betts to look at that alignment. Alternative
alignments were presented to ROCOG and City and County staff, and it appears as though the
alignment of the portion of the roadway through the proposed GDP has been pretty much
determined. Ms. Baker reminded the Commission they will need to make separate motions for
the GDP and plat.
Ms. Baker referred to the staff -suggested findings and stated that staff recommends approval
subject to five conditions. She explained that number 1 is a list of items that need to be
changed on the GDP and the applicant's consultant is aware that it will be recommended that
the Council not take action on the GDP or plat until these revisions are submitted to staff. Ms.
Baker suggested rewording condition number 3 to state, "At the time of platting, controlled
access must be provided along Bandei Road, with the exception of the public road shown on
the GDP, and also within 50' of the intersection with Bendel Road. At the time of platting,
controlled access shall be provided along the right-of-way for the road labeled "future 65'
Street," consistent with an access study being completed for that roadway, and when platted,
the area shown as the 66' future access and utility easement shall be dedicated as public right-
of-way to the north property line." She pointed out the reason for this is a study will determine
where the access point should be along the future roadway and controlled access should be
provided consistent with what the study determines, which she has discussed with the
applicant.
Mr. Werven asked if an EAW has been submitted for the property.
Ms. Baker answered no, and explained that the development triggers a mandatory EAW, so
that will need to be done in the future.
I
Page 3
City Planning and Zoning Commission `tinutes
Heanng Dare: February 4, 2000
30 3
Mr. Quinn referred to the last bullet on number 1 and asked that the change be pointed out on
the map.
Ms. Baker explained this, and stated that the consultant is aware of that condition. She also
pointed out where the 65' future access and utility easement will need to be shown as public
right-of-way.
Ms. Schultze asked if there was any discussion of looping the road and eliminating a cul-de-sac
on the east.
Ms. Baker stated there was not any discussion on that issue.
Harvey Ratzloff, the applicant, addressed the Commission and made himself available for
questions.
Representing the applicant, Bill Tointon McGhie & Betts, Inc. addressed the Commission. He
presented a color map showing the development, and explained that the portion in the County
will be developed as suburban subdivision. The applicant agreed with staff to leave the portion
in the middle vacant from development because they don't know if City services will be
extended. He explained how sewer can be extended to serve this property. Mr. Tointon stated
that an EAW has been prepared and will be submitted to the Planning Department this week.
He noted that his firm was retained by the City to prepare some alternative routes for 65"' Street
from Bandel Road to 18u' Avenue, and the alignment of 65t" Street through the Big De
development is fairly well fixed, so they can proceed with platting.
Mr. Tointon referred to the conditions, and stated they have several issues to raise:
Regarding the second bullet on number 1 - their concern is if they accommodate that 30'
strip for a mid -block sidewalk, there will be safety issues with the grade, noting it is currently
8%. He suggested they move the pedestrian traffic, which he pointed out on the map.
2. Regarding the third bullet on number 1 — labeling the future commercial development. He
explained that no matter what this area becomes, there is opportunity for commercial use
on the property and the condition indicates they should relabel it to "Low Density
Residential." He suggested they should put in parentheses "potential future commercial
use," which would inform buyers of lots in the development to be aware of the possibility of
commercial uses on that comer parcel.
3. Regarding the Wh bullet on condition number 1 - Mr. Tointon stated that under the approved
County GDP, they left this as an easement for utilities to come through from the north and
left an access corridor in case it is developed under City standards. He commented they
should leave the plan the way it is currently.
4. Regarding condition number 3 — He understands that the controlled access would be
designated when they finish the study of 65" Street, and he asked if there would be access
to Bandel Road.
Page 9
Ci[y Plannme and Zomne Cammtssron Minutes
Hearuig Date: February 9, 2000
Ms. Baker stated that the way it is worded, access to Bandel Road would be limited at the one
public roadway shown on the GDP.
Mr. Tointon requested that be determined when the study is completed on 65" Street, and have
the condition state that.
Mr. Tointon presented a map of the plat. Regarding the pedestrian way to the south, they
would like to promote the one going to the north that goes to the open space and they would
have a connection to the open space in the far north. He stated his clients are willing to
dedicate the right-of-way of 65" Street, and Mr. Freese has told them if the applicants along the
route are willing to dedicate the route, there would be no charge for the construction of the
roadway, since it is a major road system. Mr. Tointon commented they are in agreement with
the other conditions, and they will make their revisions before the Council meeting. He added
that there is a provision in Section 64.227 of the Land Development Manual where the need for
mid -block sidewalks can be waived due to topographic conditions.
Ms. Schultze ask if adding "if grade appropriate" to the condition, would be acceptable.
Mr. Tointon stated that would be acceptable to Mr. Ratzloff and himself.
Ms. Baker suggested a condition that would require the mid -block pedestrian connection
"unless found unfeasible by the City Engineer due to topographic constraints."
Mr. Brede asked if the green area shown is potential parkland.
Mr. Tointon explained that part of it will probably be developed, and part will remain as open
space. The Park Department most likely will not accept that as a public park.
Ms. Schultze referred to the 66' future access easement, and stated since they do not know yet
what will happen it might make sense to show it.
Mr. Tointon stated it is labeled as a potential future access. He suggested rewording to say it
be dedicated if platted in the City.
Ms. Baker noted that to be consistent with what staff recommended in the County's review, the
future right-of-way should be shown as right-of-way that will be dedicated in the platting stages
of roadway. They feel it should be shown as road right-of-way all the way to the north property
line, and if it develops in the County, the County has made the decision that the access
easement is acceptable. She stated that it is staffs recommendation that it be revised as
stated in the report.
Ms. Schultze commented that she feels it would be in the best interest of the City to have it
shown as right-of-way.
Mr. Tointon stated if it were platted in the City, it would not be a 66' roadway, so there need to
be changes made to make it a City -style development. He suggested adding that if it is platted
in the City, it has to be a connected roadway.
Discussion ensued regarding the area labed "future commercial development."
Page 10
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9. ;000
3aS'
Ms. Baker referred to the labeling of the "future commercial development," and stated that staff
is comfortable with it being labeled with an existing land use of Low Density Residential and
have in parentheses "potential future commercial use." She noted that at the intersection of
those types of roadways, you can have non-residential uses and commercial uses in the
residential zoning districts.
Terry Peterson, 6420 Bendel Road NW, addressed the Commission. He pointed out his
property on the map, and asked if it was going to be annexed into the City.
Ms. Baker stated that at this time, the property is not 100% surrounded by the City, so the City
couldn't take action for annexation. She explained that typically, annexation occurs when the
property owner requests it, but if the property becomes 100% surrounded in the future, the City
may take a look at whether it would be beneficial to annex the property.
Mr. Peterson asked what the plans are for the property between his and Bandel Road.
Mr. Ratzioff readdressed the Commission, and stated they don't know at this time. They are
trying to let the people know that there is potential for some different uses in that area other
than single family residential. He stated they will work with Mr. Peterson on that.
Mr. Tointon pointed out there is a condition on the GDP that talks about the need to connect the
road to the south. As they have been studying the future 65" Street route, they have
determined that the connection to 65" out of Bandel North needs to be in a particular location,
which he pointed out on the map. He pointed out the connections that should be made and
recommended that the condition, the last bullet on number 1, should be changed.
Discussion ensued.
Mr. Reiter stated that what Mr. Tointon has described, which creates a common intersection,
will meet the intent of what the staff is attempting to accomplish in terms of access control. He
commented that staff wants to see only two connections instead of three.
With no others wishing to speak, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearings for both the
preliminary plat and the GDP.
Ms. Schultze made a motion to approve General Development Plan #149, to be known as
Hidden Oaks Valley, with staff -suggested findings and conditions as modified: Add to
the second bullet on condition number one "unless determined to be topographically
unfeasible by the City Engineer;" bullet 3 of condition number 1 to state, "Relabel the
area currently shown for commercial development. That area shall be labeled existing
land use 'Low Density Residential' {potential future commercial use permitted within
"Low Density Residential" land use designation)."
Mr. Tointon noted that because of the possibility of that portion of property being rezoned in the
future, that rather than tie it to any land use, it be labeled as existing "Low Density Residential"
with "potential future commercial use." He stated he wants to make sure they don't deceive
people who buy lots.
Voage l l
City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
Heanne Dare: February 9, 2000
Ms. Baker explained that the language Mr. Tointon proposed is acceptable. She pointed out
that if a land use plan amendment and zone change are requested, a revision to the GDP may
be required.
Ms. Schultze continued with her motion, adding to the 5'" bullet of condition number 1,
"if platted within the City;" the 61° bullet of condition number 1 "limiting accesses to the
Collector road to two intersections in the southeast corner that will be platted with
subdivision lots;" condition 3 to state, "At the time of platting, controlled access must be
provided along Bendel Road, with the exception of the public road shown on the GDP,
and also within 50' of the Intersection with Bandel Road, consistent with an access
study being completed for that roadway. At the time of platting, controlled access shall
be provided along the right-of-way for the road labeled 'future 65`° Street,' consistent
with an access study being completed for that roadway. When platted, the area shown
as the'66' future access and utility easement' shall be dedicated as public right-of-way
to the north property line." The motion was seconded by Mr. Staver, and carried 7-0.
Conditions:
1. The GDP be revised to:
• Identify the future alignment of Bandel Rd. NW with a 900 intersection with the
future collector road;
• Provide a 30' wide mid -block pedestrian connection along the south side of
the most southerly east -west roadway, unless determined to be
topographically unfeasible by the City Engineer;
• Relabel the area currently shown for commercial development. That area shall
be labeled existing land use "Low Density Residential" (potential future
commercial use permitted within "Low Density Residential" land use
designation).
• Identify future pedestrian trails along the east side of Bandel Rd. NW and the
south side of the future collector road;
• Show the "66' Future Access and Utility Easement" as public right-of-way to
the north property line, which will be dedicated at the time of platting, if
platted within the City;
• Minimize access to the future collector road by realigning the most southerly
east -west road so that it Intersects with the stubbed roadway leading south
from the future collector, or so that it intersects with the northisouth roadway
located north of the future collector, and, at the extreme southeast corner of
the property, limiting accesses to the Collector road to two intersections in the
southeast comer that will be platted with subdivision lots;
The revised GDP shall be filed with the Planning Department.
2. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the
obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm water management,
park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication,
and contributions for public infrastructure.
3. At the time of platting, controlled access must be provided along Bandel Road, with
the exception of the public road shown on the GDP, and also within 50' of the
Page 1?
City Plannme and Zonine Commission Minutes
Hearing Date: February 9.2000
intersection with Bandel Road, consistent with an access study being completed for
that roadway. At the time of platting, controlled access shall be provided along the
right-of-way for the road labeled 'future 6r Street,' consistent with an access study
being completed for that roadway. When platted, the area shown as the '66' future
access and utility easement' shall be dedicated as public right-of-way to the north
property line.
4. Roadway names shown on the GDP may not meet the roadway naming standards of
the LDM. The applicant shall coordinate with the City and Planning Department GIS
staff to determine appropriate roadway naming designations.
5. In order to provide adequate water supply for this development, the development will
either need to be timed so that the NW High Level Water System is available to this
property concurrent with infrastructure improvements on -site. Or, a temporary
booster pump station shall be installed by the developer to improve water service to
the property and the station be removed at the time the NW High Level System is
made available.
Ms. Baker clarified that condition number 6 on the preliminary plat should state, "Parkland
dedication for this property shall be met via cash in lieu of land."
Ms. Schultze moved to approve Preliminary Plat #99-48, to be known as Bendel North
Subdivision, with staff -suggested findings and conditions, with the 4'" bullet of condition
number 1 modified to add, "unless determined to be topographically unfeasible by the
City Engineer," and condition 6 modified as stated above by Ms. Baker. Mr. Staver
seconded the motion, which carried 7.0.
Conditions:
The Plat be revised as follows.
be shown as right-of-way
Controlled access be provided along Bendel Rd. NW and along the westerly
50' of the south property line of Lot 13, Block 4; along the westerly 50' of the
north property line of Lot 1, Block 1 and along both sides of the collector road
(currently shown as Outlot B).
A 20' utility easement shall be provided between two of the lots within Block 4,
as requested by RPU Water Division in the attached memo dated January 28,
2000.
A 30' easement shall be provided for a mid -block pedestrian connection along
the south side of the road labeled "66'° St. NW", between Bendel Rd. NW and
the road labeled "26"Ave. NW," unless determined to be topographically
unfeasible by the City Engineer.
Roadway names shall be revised and the future collector road shall be named
with names and roadway types approved by the City and Planning Department
GIS Division.
IA9age l_
1TV Planning and Zonine Comaussion Minutes
Heanne Date: February 9. 2000
2. Storm water management must be provided for this development. Any facility
serving 50 or less developable acres will remain private and will require execution of
long term maintenance agreements and easements.
3. Easements for off site utilities and a temporary turn -a -round at the east end of 1166`t,
St. NW" shall be executed prior to recording the Final Plat Documents for this
property.
4. In addition to construction of sidewalk along both sides of all new public roads, a 90'
wide bituminous pedestrian facility is required along Sandel Rd. NW.
5. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the
obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, storm water management,
park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication,
and contributions for public infrastructure.
6. Parkland dedication for this property shall be met via cash in lieu of land.
Mr. Brede asked if these are a lot of booster pumps in the City.
Mr. Tointon replied that�ere are not a lot of themnd he provided an explanation of how they
operate.
Wedqewood Hills Subdivisions.
Ms. Baker presented the staff report,
report is on file at the Rochester-OI
Ms. Baker presented a map and e
under 80 acres to be developed w
south 40 acres will depend on the
recommending mid -block pedest
contain specific criteria for when
topography on this site may po
be included to state "Mid -block
d d February 4, 2000, to the Commission. The staff
ms d tanning Department.
ined t location, noting the property consists of just
low dense residential uses. The number of lots in the
tension of s wer and water. She stated that staff is again
connections d the revised Subdivision Regulations
mid -block con ctions should be required. The
some challenges f roviding those, so similar language can
nnections be provide unless determined to be unfeasible by
the City Engineer, due to topo raphic constraints." Ms. ker explained that the applicant is
also proposing a Substantial and Alteration and she poi d out the area on the map that will
need to be re -graded. Shtarn
led they are not proposing t haul material off -site and there will
not be any grades steeper 3:1 when finished. Ms. Ba r commented that the knob of the
hill will be removed, leavenling terrain, and she pointed out the area where the fill will be
deposited, stating that areas of hydric soils will need to be evaluated before any filling takes
place. She explained that staff recommends approval subject to 7 conditions and added an 80
W
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AUrNUA JCI. I IUN:
PUBLIC HEARLNGS
titEET!NG 301
DATE: 3 -U-liO
ING DEPT: ITEM NO.
PLAIN-NTNG - !D
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Type III, Phase II, Preliminary Plat #99-48 to be known as I PREPARED BY:
Bandel North First Subdivision. Mitzi A. Baker.
March 1, 2000
NOTE: Staff recommends that the City Council continue this item until the General Development Plan and Plat for
this property have been revised and re -submitted.
City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission considered this preliminary plat at a public hearing on February 9, 2000. The Piannirg
Commission found that this preliminary plat needs to be modified to conform to the criteria listed in the Land Development
Manual and recommends approval of this preliminary plat subject to modifications and conditions.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of Preliminary Plat #99.40, subject to the following modifications
and conditions.
The Plat be revised as follows:
• Outlot "B" shall be shown as right-of-way
• Controlled access be provided along Bandel Rd. NW and along the westerly 50' of the south property line of Lot 13,
Block 4; along the westerly 50' of the north property line of Lot 1, Block 1 and along both sides of the collector road
(currently shown as Outlot e).
• A 20' utility easement shall be provided between two of the lots within Block 4, as requested by RPU Water Division in
the attached memo dated January 28, 2000.
• A 30' easement shall be provided for a mid -block pedestrian connection along the south side of the road labeled "66'"
St. NW", between Bandel Rd. NW and the road labeled "26'" Ave. NW," unless determined to be topographically
unfeasible by the City Engineer.
• Roadway names shall be revised and the future collector road shall be named with names and roadway types approved
by the City and Planning Department GIS Division.
2. Storm water management must be provided for this development Any facility serving 50 or less developable acres will
remain private and will require execution of long term maintenance agreements and easements.
3. Easements for off site utilities and a temporary turn -a -round at the east end of "6C" St NW" shall be executed prior to
recording the Final Plat Documents for this property.
4. In addition to construction of sidewalk along both sides of all new public roads, a 10' wide bituminous pedestrian facility is
required along Bandel Rd, NW
5. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to,
but not limited to, storm water managemen4 park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way
dedication, and contributions for public infrastructure.
6. Parkland dedication for this property shall be met via cash in lieu of land. Cln
COUNCIL ACTION: motion by Second
Page 2
RCA
03,01!00 3(O
Council Action Needed:
The Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the land subdivision permit.
The Council must make findings of fact as a basis for the decision.
Attachment:
1. Staff Report dated February 4, 2000
2. Minutes of February 9, 2000 CPZC Meeting
Distribution:
1. City Administrator
2. City Clerk
3. City Attorney
4. Planning Department File
5. Planning Department, GIS Division
6. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m.
Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street SE.
7. McGhie & Betts, Inc.
on Monday March 6. 2000, in the Council/Board
N
,i!d � i;iiZ—esme:�
lia i�lt!
;
- i
�✓ � 1
'^w-� �- -
�
a1 1 Dili, 1 1 1
, 1
`�
N
v�I
r
If
,
�,,�if
A _mal
w
�,
1
Jail
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner
DATE: February 4, 2000
:—�+--�.-=•.fir-'�-�-�.c'� '�i
�R�TED•AUCUjT.S':
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507,1285-8232
PLANNING
GIS/ADDRESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOusINGlHRA
5071285.8224
BUILDING CODE
507/285.8213
WELUSEPTIC
507/285-8345
FAX
507/287.2275
RE: Type III, Phase it Land Subdivision Permit (Preliminary Plat) #99-48 by
Big DE Development to be known as Bandel North First Subdivision.
The Plat proposes to subdivide 28.66 acres of land into 66 single family
residential lots and three Outiots. The Plat also dedicated right of way
for four new public roads. The property is located along the east side of
Bandel Road NW, adjacent to the City of Rochester water tower site
Planning Department Review:
Applicant/Owner:
SurveyorslEngineers:
Big DE Development
PO Box 247
Byron, MN 55920
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
1648 Third Ave. SE
Rochester. MN 55904
Referral Comments: Rochester Department of Public Works; Planning
Department Transportation Division: Rochester Park
& Rec. Dept.; RPU Water Division; Rochester Fire
Department; Planning Department, GIS Division
Report Attachments: 1. Land Development Manual Excerpts
2. Referral Comments (5 Letters)
3. Copy of Preliminary Plat
Development Review:
Location of Property: This plat is located east of Bandel Rd., south of 65"
St. NW.
Zoning: The property is zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family).
Proposed Development: This development consists of 28.66 acres to be
subdivided into 66 lots for single family residential
development and 3 Outlots.
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2
February 4, 2000
Streets: The plat proposes to dedicate right-of-way for three
(3) new roads and will also dedicate right-cf-way for
Bandel Roaa.
Cutlot B on the Plat is the planned alignment for a
future collector road. The Plat will need to be revised
to dedicate the right-of-way for this roadway.
Roadway named need to be revised. The applicant
will need to coordinate with the City and Planning
Department GIS staff to determine appropriate
names.
Utilities: Sewer is available at Bendel Rd. NW and will be
extended to serve this Plat.
Water service to the site is currently limited. In order
to provide adequate pressure for domestic use, the
Northwest High Level Water System will need to be
extended to this property from the Orchard Ridge
development on the west side of TH 52. An alternate
option, approved by RPU Water, is the installation of
a temporary booster pump station that would be
removed at the time the higher pressure from the NW
High Level System is made available.
Sidewalks: In accordance with current City policy, sidewalk is
required along the streets being dedicated in this plat.
A 10' pedestrian trail will also be required along the
east side of Bendel Rd. NW.
Drainage: The property generally drains to the north. The Plat
labels a "detention pond area' in the northerly portion
of Outlot A. Storm sewer is proposed to capture and
convey run off, from a majority of the site, to Outlot A.
A small portion of the property drains to the
southwest. That run off is proposed to be captured
by storm sewer which will extend to Bandel Road.
Specific grading and drainage plans will need to be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to submittal
of a Final Plat application.
Wetlands: Minnesota Statutes require that all developments be
reviewed for the presence of wetlands or hydric soils.
There do not appear to be hydric soils on this portion
of the property according to the Soils Survey.
Spillover Parking: The spillover parking requirements for this
development would be 79 parking spaces. The
proposed roadways should be adequate to
accommodate the required spillover spaces.
Parkland Dedication: The Park & Recreation Department recommends that
dedication requirements be satisfied by cash in lieu of
land. There is a 40 acre Park/School property
3t3'
Z14 /
Page 3
February 4, 2000
southeast of this propertv.
General Development Plan: This property is included within the Hidden Oaks
Valley GDP which is being reviewed concurrent with
this Plat.
Staff Review and Recommendation:
The Planning staff has reviewed this preliminary plat request under the provisions of LDM
Sections 61.225 (effective 51151199). In order to meet the criteria, approval of this plat should
require the following conditions or modifications:
1. The Plat be revised as follows:
• Outlot "B"shall be shown as right-of-way
• Controlled access be provided along Bendel Rd. NW and along the westerly 50' of the
south property line of Lot 13, Block 4; along the westerly 50' of the north property line
of Lot 1, Block 1 and along both sides of the collector road (currently shown as Outlot
B).
• A 20' utility easement shall be provided between two of the lots within Block 4, as
requested by RPU Water Division in the attached memo dated January 28, 2000.
• A 30' easement shall be provided for a mid -block pedestrian connection along the
south side of the road labeled '66`" St. NW', between Bandel Rd. NW and the road
labeled "2e Ave. NW".
• Roadway names shall be revised and the future collector road shall be named with
names and roadway types approved by the City and Planning Department G1S
Division.
2. Stormwater management must be provided for this development. Any facility serving
50 or less developable acres will remain private and will require execution of long term
maintenance agreements and easements.
3. Easements for off site utilities and a temporary turn -a -round at the east end of "66`" St.
NW" shall be executed prior to recording the Final Plat Documents for this property.
4. In addition to construction of sidewalk along both sides of all new public roads, a 10'
wide bituminous pedestrian facility is required along Bandel Rd. NW.
5. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City that outlines the
obligations of the applicant relating to, but not limited to, stormwater management,
park dedication, traffic improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication,
and contributions for public Infrastructure.
6. Parkland dedication for this property shall be me via cash in lieu of land.
`Staff recommends that the City Council not take action on this Plat until the GDP for this
property and this Preliminary Plat have been revised and revised plans have been tiled
with the Planning Department.
Page 4
February 4, 2000
REMINDER TO APPLICANT:
• This Ptat is subject to the Subdivision regulations which became effective May 15,
1999. Approved construction plans and an executed Development Agreement will
need to be submitted with the final plat application, if the developer wishes to record
the Plat prior to completion of improvements.
• Prior to development, the property owner will need to execute a City Owner Contract
that requires the developer to construct the public roadways and utilities.
CRITERIA FOR LAND SUBDIVISION PERMIT (PRELIMINARY PLAT)
Effective May 15, 1999
61.225 Findings for Land Subdivision:
The Zoning Administrator, Commission or Council shall approve a development permit authorizing
a land subdivision if all of the following findings with respect to the proposed development are
made:
A. The proposed land subdivision conforms to all relevant requirements of this ordinance and
variances have been granted to permit any nonconformance.
B. That the proposed water system and sanitary sewer system are adequate to serve the normal
and fire protection demands of proposed development and to provide for the efficient and
timely extension to serve future development.
C. That the plan for soil erosion and stormwater management meets the adopted standards of
the City of Rochester and is consistent with the adopted Stormwater Management Plan or
adopted drainage or stormwater policies.
D. That the vehicular and non -motorized system is consistent with adopted transportation plans
and is consistent with the street layout standards listed in Section 64.120 and traffic service
standards in Section 61.526.
E. That the lot and block layout provide for safe and convenient vehicular, service and
emergency access, efficient utility service connections, and adequate buildable area in each
lot for planned uses.
F. That the proposed land subdivision has taken into account the current 6-Year and other Long -
Range Capital Improvements Programs and the elements listed therein in the design of the
subdivision.
G. That the proposed subdivision, if in a residential zoning district, —addresses the need for
spillover parking consistent with the requirements of Section 63.426.
H. That right-of-ways and easements of adequate size and dimension are —provided for the
purpose of constructing the street, utility, and drainage facilities needed to serve the
development.
I. That the proposed parks, trail thoroughfares and open space dedications are consistent with
adopted plans, policies and regulations.
5or"
3« '
Page 5
February 4, 2000
J. That the proposed subdivision will not have off -site impacts on the street, drainage, water or
wastewater systems that exceed adopted standards.
K. That the proposed subdivision will not have adverse impacts on the safety or viability of
permitted uses on adjacent properties.
L. That the proposed land subdivision is designed in such a manner as to allow for continued
development in an efficient manner on adjacent undeveloped lands;
M. That the soils, topography and water tables have been adequately studied to ensure that all
lots are developable for their designated purposes.
N. That the proposed land subdivision is consistent with the standards of the City's adopted
Comprehensive Plan.
O. That any land located within Zone A as shown on the currently adopted Flood Boundary and
Floodway Maps of the Flood Insurance Study, Rochester, Minnesota, prepared by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, is -determined to be suitable for its intended use and that
the proposed subdivision adequately mitigates the risks of Flooding, inadequate drainage, soil
and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, or any
other floodplain related risks to the health, safety or welfare of the future residents of the
proposed subdivision in a manner consistent with this ordinance.
ROCHESTEK
Minnesota
2 1/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
*REVISED* 212100
3r7
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4ih Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281.6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for a
Preliminary Plat 9948 on Bandel North First Subdivision (Big DE Development
Property). The following are the Public Works comments on the proposal: NOTE:
Revisions to our prior comments are indicated in BOLD:
Storm Water Management must be provided for this development. As
shown on the Preliminary Plat, a detention pond is proposed for this
development. If this facility is to serve 50 or less acres, it will remain
private, and execution of a Declaration for long term private
maintenance and ownership will be required, as well as, dedication of
easements to the City for maintenance and repair.
2. A City / Owner Contract must be executed prior to development of this
property, to address the construction of all public infrastructure and
utilities to serve this subdivision.
3. Easements for off site utilities will be required prior to recording the
final plat.
4. A temporary turn -around, and associated easement will be required at
the eastern end of 66th St NW.
5. Pedestrian facilities shall be located and constructed along all public
roadways, includi5 within and abutting the plat (including Bandel
Road &#uture 6-5 ST NW) consistent with City standards,
concurrent with this development
6. Dedication of controlled access is required on the Final Plat, along the
west lot line of Lot 13, Block 4 & Lot 1, Block 1. Additionally, access
02
CATEMPW P9948Rev1-00.doe
W ROCHESTER
Minnesota
2 00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
CEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 4'" Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507.287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
control on these two lots shall extend easterly 50 feet from the
Bandel Rd NW ROW.
7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the
City that outlines the obligations of the applicant relating to, but
not limited to, stormwater management, park dedication, traffic
improvements, pedestrian facilities, right-of-way dedication, and
contributions for public infrastructure.
8. Outlot B, as shown on the revised Preliminary Plat should be
dedicated as ROW, as it is the future location of 651h St NW.
9. The street shown as "661h St NW" on the plan needs to be
renamed (it's south of 651h St NW).
10. Pedestrian facilities along the east side of Bandel Rd NW shall
consist of a 10 foot wide bituminous pedestrian path.
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property:
sp Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) @ $1605.50 per
developable acre.
•:• Water Availability Charge (WAC) @ $1605.50 per developable
acre.
A proportional share of the costs to reconstruct Bendel Road
NW.
e-S
Nk�
❖ Sanitary Sewer & Water Connection Charges for the frontage
along Bendel Road.
❖ Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic
Division.
CITEMP\PP9948Rev1-00,doc
0
3/9
FROM: Planning Department, Transportation Division
rrei i iat aa-
48
Bandel North
First
The final plat for this subdivision should have a no access restriction
included on the west side of Lot 1 of Block 1 and Lot 13 of Block 4
Outlot B should be either dedicated as right of way or a condition should
be included in the Development Agreement that will accompany
development of this subdivision to the effect that if the City determines to
proceed with the construction of 65'" St Outlot B will be deeded to city for
right of way purposes. The standard policy of the city is to require
dedication of local and collector street right of ways as part of the plat
approvalprocess.
City GDP 149 The main issue in regards to this General Development Plan is the
Hidden Oaks identification of a future corridor to allow for the extension of 65" St.
Valley eastward from Bandel Road to 18th Ave. The need for this corridor has
been identified through on -going discussions and review of street systems
needs in the area. The corridor addresses two key needs:
I
1. As a general rule of thumb, typically urban development intensities
require collector and/or arterial streets to be providing on or about
mile spacings in order to provide an adequate amount of major street
capacity (thus relieving traffic from local streets) and to provide
adequate overall connectivity. Prior to this time north of 55" St. there
have been no major east -west streets planned. In part this was a
response to the thought that urban intensity development would not
extend north of where a 65" St. extension would be located. However,
with the urban growth boundary expansion being discussed it appears
that urban intensity development will extend further north and
infrastructure accommodations need to be planned for.
i 2. A second concern is that with a planned overpass of TH 52 at 651° St.
envisioned as the minimum improvement at that intersection, there is
the potential for additional traffic from the west side of TH 52 being
funneled into the intersection of the Bendel Rd/East Frontage Rd and
55v' St. The extension of 651" St. to W Ave. will reduce this impact
and relieve the level of congestion that would otherwise occur there by
providing for a better overall dispersion of traffic throughout this area.
ROCOG has initiated the process to amend the Long Range Thoroughfare
Plan to reflect the extension of 65`" St. as a collector street between
Bendel Road and 18t' Ave. The City has retained the firm of McGhie &
Betts to evaluated alternative alignments for the 65'" St. corridor. Their
preliminary analysis has been reviewed with the staffs of City and County
Public Works, MnDOT and Planning's transportation staff. Of the
altematives evaluated, which included corridors that would have went
south of the Hidden Oaks area, the corridor reflected on the plan appears
to provide the most logical location in terns of road alignment, function
and minimizing the division of current property ownerships. When this
alignment leaves the Hidden Oaks site heading eastward there are some
alternative options which are being reviewed with landowners, which
include the School District and Park Department on a 40 acre site
immeAinfaiv fn fhe ennlhmaf
3 rpu
we M!edye, we deliver
January 28, 2000
Rochester -Olmsted
CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904-7996
REFERENCE: REVISED Type III, Phase II, Preliminary Plat #99-48 by Big DE Development
to be known as Bandel North First Subdivision.
Dear Ms. LaPalm:
Our review of the referenced preliminary plat is complete and our comments follow:
L This property is serviceable from the Northwest High Level Water System, which is
currently available approximately one mile to the west at the North Park Water Tower. There
are preliminary plans however to extend this water system to the east with the Orchard Ridge
Development and a feasibility study has been prepared by the City Public Works Department
to bring it the balance of the way to serve this area.
2. The other option that has been discussed and approved by us is the installation of a temporary
booster pump station by the developer to provide adequate pressure for domestic use and a
limited amount of water available for fire protection. This would then be removed at the time
the higher pressure from the NW High Level System was made available.
3. A 20' public utility easement is needed between 2 of the lots in Block 4 for a water main to
serve the unplatted land to the northwest of this plat. We previously sent review comments to
the applicant's engineering firm on the actual alignment of this water main and with other
comments on the proposed water system layout. These previous comments will still apply to
this submittal.
Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions.
Very truly yours,
p
Donn Richardson
Water
C: Doug Rovang, RPU
Mike Engle, RPU
Mark Baker, City Public Works
Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention Bureau
McGhie & Betts, Inc.
Big DE Development
Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813
telephone 507-280-1540 facsurule 507-280-1542
ROCHESTER PARK AND I CREATION DEPARTMENT
201 FOURTH STREET SE
ROCRETER MINNESOTA 55904-3769
TELE 507-281-6160
FAX 507-281-6165
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 29, 1999
TO: Suzanne LaPalm
Planning
RE: Bandel North First Subdivision
Preliminary #99-48
Acreage of plat ..........................................................
28.66 acres
Number of dwelling units .............................................
66 units
Densityfactor ............................................................
.0244
Dedication...............................................................
1.61 acres
Fair market value of land .............................................
The Park and Recreation Department recommends that dedication requirements be met
via cash in lieu of land. Schmidt Park, 40 acre site jointly owned by City/School District is
located SE of the plat.
Is Outlot A intended to be public or private and is the purpose of the outlot stormwater
detention?
N:\PAPK\DST0T2\I999\DEDICATI\NW 2898\WLNDEL HILLS NORTH.00C
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
'JEE-:,'�G 3023 '
DATE :-6-i10
AGENDA SECTION:
ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO.
PLBLIC HEARNGS
PLAYNING S , 1+
EM DESCRIPTION: Final Plat s00-07 to be known as Diamond Ridge Seventeen BY:Brent
:1PREPARED
wenby.
�C
I
February 29, 2000
Planning Department Review:
See attached Staff Report dated February 29, 2000.
Council Action Needed:
I
1. A resolution approving the plat can be adopted.
Enclosures: To be submitted
( b ed separately to the City Clerk by the Planning
Staff upon receipt from the applicant)
1. City Clerk's Copy of Applications
2. Recording Statement
3. TreasureriAuditor's Statement
4. Recording Fee
5 Title Opinion
6 1 Original Plat Mylar
7 2 Mylar Copies of Plat
n
Attachment:
1. Staff Report dated February 29, 2000.
n
11�
Distribution:
1. City Clerk
2. City Attorney
3. Planning Department File
4. Planning Department - GIS
5. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m.
on Monday March 6, 2000, in the Council/Board
Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street SE.
6. McGhie & Betts, Inc.
OUNCILACTION: Mchonby: Second by:
I
to:
NO
m
z
J
r
—
i
—
I
2
II
i
i
l
x�
I '
ry •y �.
\ Y
OY
i Y i2IA
T
(a a as e e a sna'a ma afa aJlFaIaILTLFa a H F'flala151a:a1
a! bN S�aa! j fafmmXt� f"uFala�
't.iV •w �\.aS ae a1L14a xIJa2�L�1 i 11
i T Ya ea, ; aa]A7Y1N`�
t mNS Xt JI �X IFI.,91 ��.i.�xt1 mNStl ...I
�f.ilFlildla S�SmP m" Iuf •AG'fiFlq lfmLf
IY1�� I .IaL.�! -IS a'alal•Sa OalRl.zll ater.l
I II �f ll li ll I t III I�I11
Note.. �albs ] olvielN. 31sIS,Iy],i�a"aJ'F11e Aalnelelal :.3 9170 IL?1T�31 Ixal I (1 ='F al��e�e; �I
CyC-
a`.Itilt I IL+;,i+t � tt flit IIi
I ``YY saga li vylmnra a'tiS.a lomx �94 t
t ie'1�o.et� q'IaP^7 I Ismail I`�.ibelt S>ilb:aM`"I i
'�:ahlsma � t.NbwilJf.b errxm rmNNM
aIsIT� I!i"T- ] f ....IYMJAYIY7 YN I11`!.'
I l l l
l al i� .W n 1 Iasi eia� tattler,''.
F a
i —
fiC I
\p y 7- e�i
ltJ
1
lava
d o.� 1a10
oil
ko
0
®.. �•
'
=
m
n
7 1GL('1J M t
s
7 .tLLMN Its .y ' —JAxi-
a
a a n"H
x}
a _ R — — —
_ -.Sf _
CM 3AMU A377YA A A977YA
T�
slw.
I I I
hl >
I I <--S.LSZRS E JO VLJeTRS 99S-->
d
JC
W S i
pppYYY�������YYYtY(
Y
i
1
j
<--SL33HS 8 do Z ,L33HS 9.3S-->
r , 74. .� : 1z I ��•l�
`i
0, cIU%
ALAI 3AIdU AJ77VA i
—a — - — - — 3.�aaoa ,
9�:°71 mt ----
— --b-- '� --� '� n —
27 ■ i ,
r�i I n
iii V —
a
■ N
Ito
oil
si aoaix axo�ra �
.v, I.cuno
IMA
ti4
TO: Rochester Common Council
FROM: Brent Svenby, Planner
DATE: February 29, 2000
µ�i�IFt,rF R�rrt
�R��T£0•aIGL>F� `
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507+285-8232
PLANNING
GI&ADDRESSING/
507,1285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGJHRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
5071285-8213
wEL"EPT1C
507/285-8345
FAX
507/287.2275
RE: Final Plat #00-07 to be known Diamond Ridge 17t" Subdivision.
Planning Department Review:
Applicant/Owner: Western Walls, Inc.
Attn: Julie Leisen
604 — 11i° Ave. NW
Rochester, MN 55901
SurveyorsiEngineers: McGhie 8 Betts, Inc.
1648 3rd Avenue SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Referral Comments: 1. Park and Recreation Department
2. Planning Department - Wetland _GU
3. Planning Department — Transportation
4. Planning Department — Addressing
5. RPU Operations Division
6. RPU Water Division
Report Attachments: 1. Referral Comments (3 Letters)
2. Location Map
3. Copy of Preliminary Plat
4. Copy of Final Plat
Plat Data:
Location of Property: This plat is located north of 7"' St. NW, south of T.H.
14 and west of 48M Ave. NW.
Zoning: This property is zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family)
district in the City of Rochester.
Proposed Development: This development consists of 15.01 acres to be
subdivided into 61 lots for single family residential
development.
�� AN EQUAL OPPOPTUNITW AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2
D,amono R.dge 17'° Suocrwsion
February 29, 2000
Streets: The plat dedicates right-of-way for three t3)
roadways.
The first roadway is the extension of 50`" Ave. NW (in
Diamond Ridge 16" Sub.) to 71' Street NW. It is
designed with a 66' right-of-way, with a 36' roadway,
The second roadway is "Gem Lane NW" which is a
,�ul-de-sac, designed with a 28' wide roadway on a 50'
wide right-of-way.
The third roadway is right-of-way dedication of 40'
from the existing 7'" Street NW.
The proposed streets meet the minimum standards
as outlined in the Thoroughfare Plan and the Land
Development Manual.
Sidewalks: In accordance with current City policy, sidewalk is
required along both sides of all roadways.
Drainage: The property drains to the north and stormwater is
planned to be conveyed through a storm sewer
system to detention ponds located north of 11" Court
NW.
Wetlands: Minnesota Statutes now require that all developments
be reviewed for the presence of wetlands or hydric
soils. The Soils Survey does not indicate hydric soils
within this Plat.
Public Utilities: Portions of this plat are located adjacent to roadways
platted as Diamond Ridge 16'" Subdivision. Utilities
will be extended in those roadway to serve portions of
this plat and will also be extended in the new roads
currently being platted.
Spillover Parking: The spillover parking requirements for this
development would be 74 parking spaces. The
proposed roadways should be adequate to
accommodate the required spillover spaces.
Parkland Dedication: The Park and Recreation Department recommends
that dedication requirements be met via dedication of
1.80 acres of land from Outlot A, Diamond Ridge 15
Subdivision, which is identified on the GDP as a Park.
General Development Plan: This property is included within the Diamond Ridge
General Development Plan, which was most recently
revised in 1998 with the approval of the preliminary
plat for Diamond Ridge 15 Subdivision.
3' 0 Page 3
JJ�� Diamond Ridge 17`" Subdivision
February 29, 2000
Preliminary Plat:
A preliminary plat for this property was approved by the City Council on February 1, 1999 with the
following conditions:
1. That a grading plan be submitted to the Public Works Department at least 2 weeks
prior to seeking final plat approval.
2. The final plat show controlled access along 7'" St. NW.
3. The easement located between Topaz Lane to 10'" Street be increased to provide for 10
feet on each side from the centerline of the proposed utilities.
4. The roadway name "Topaz Lane" be changed to a unique name not currently used
(Onyx, Lapis, Garnet, Tigereye and Turquoise are all unique).
5. The developer agrees to parkland dedication requirement of 5.1 acres as outlined in a
letter from the Park & Recreation Department dated January 21, 1999. The applicant also
agree to deed Outlot A to the City either 1) once the ponds are constructed and accepted
by Public Works or 2) the park department wishes to begin development of the park and
to grade the park accesses as outlined in said letter from the Rochester Park 8
Recreation Department.
6. The soils survey indicates the presence of hydric soils in the northwest portion of
the site (Outlot A). No grading, fill or land disturbance activity shall occur within
Outlot A prior to investigation of wetlands and approval a delineation, no -loss
certificate or other appropriate permits by the Local Governing Unit (LGU).
Planning Staff and Recommendation:
The preliminary plat for this property was approved prior to the adoption of the new
subdivision regulations, which became effective May 15, 1999. Since this final plat
application was filed prior to May 15, 2000, the subdivision regulations by which this final
plat is reviewed are those which were in effect prior to May 15, 1999.
The Planning Staff has reviewed the submitted final plat and finds that it is consistent with the
approved preliminary plat. The staff would then recommend approval subject to the following
conditions
1. The applicant agrees to meet parkland dedication requirements through the dedication
of land (1.80 acres of Outlot A, Diamond Ridge 15"' Subdivision) as outlined in the
attached memo from the Rochester Park & Recreation Department dated February 17,
2000.
2. The plat must be revised to identify controlled access along the entire frontage of 7ftr
Street NW, with the exception of the street access shown as 50'" Ave. NW. Controlled
access must also be identified along the southern 50 feet of the east lot line of Lot 13,
Block 2 and the entire west lot line of Lot 1, Block 3.
3. Prior to the recording of the final plat documents, a pedestrian facilities agreement
must be executed with the City of Rochester for the required pedestrian facilities along
7' Street NW.
ROCHESTER
Minnesota
2,29/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester. MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur
33r'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
201 41° Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for Final Plat #00-07 on
the Diamond Ridge Seventeen property. The following are Public Works comments on the
proposal:
l.Pedestnan facilities shall be constructed concurrent with this development, and located
along both sides of all public roadways within the plat, and along the north right-of-
way of 7" St W.
2. Execution of a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement is required for required facilities along
7" St NW.
3. A City / Owner Contract must be executed prior to development of this property to
address the construction of all public infrastructure and utilities to serve this plat.
4. Controlled access is required ilong the entire frontage of 7" St NW, with the exception
of the street access shown as 50" Ave NW. Additional controlled access is needed
along the southern 50 feet of the east line of Lot 13, Block 2, & the entire west line of
Lot 1, Block 3.
The following charges/fees are applicable for the development of the property:
Trunkline Sanitary Sewer 18619 @ $665.1598 per acre plus Interest @ 7.0%
from 6/25/80 (10yr max) = $1,130.77 per acre.
:• CCM Water Tower J8251 @ $900.88 per acre plus Interest @ 7.0% from
7/2/79 (10 yr max) = $1,531.50 per acre
A contribution will be required for reconstruction of 7'" St NW.
Stormwater Management Fees @$1,983.50 per acre, if on -site detention is
not provided.
:• Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division:
8 Street Name Signs
3 Stop Signs
1 "30" MPH Sign
09T E MP\FP#00.07 Rev2-28. doc
rochester
DATE: February 17, 2000
TO: Suzanne LaPalm
Planning
ROCHESTER PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
RE: Final Plat #00-7
Diamond Ridge 17'h
201 FOURTH STREET SE
ROCHETER MINNESOTA 55904-3769
TELE 507-281-6160
FAX 507-281-6165
MEMORANDUM
Acreage of plat..........................................................
Number of dwelling units .............................................
Dwelling unit density ..................................................
Density factor, .. ... ... ... ... ................................ .. .........
Dedication...............................................................
15.01 acres
61 units
4.06 units I acre
.12
1,80 acres
The Park and Recreation Department recommends that dedication requirements be met
via dedication of 1.80 acres of land at the site of the 2n" Diamond Ridge neighborhood park
(Outlot A Diamond Ridge 150 ) as identified on the Diamond Ridge GDP.
The applicant has deferred the following dedication
Diamond Ridge 12" ...........1.09
acres
Diamond Ridge 14'"...........
.55 acres
Diamond Ridge 15"............
1.59 acres
Diamond Ridge 16'......
.....1.40 acres
Diamond Ridge 17'h........
... 1.80 acres
6.43 acres
Based on the approved drainage plan for Diamond Ridge 15 Outlot A, the applicant will
have established credits of approximately 9.0 acres once Outlot A is deeded to the City.
Final determination of the amount of credits to be established for the outlot will be
determined once the detention pond and drainage easement construction is completed.
Apalcant:
Westem Wails Inc
60411 Ave NW
\\CITY OF ROCHES,ER\CITYHAii\PARK\OSTOTZ\2000\DEOICA::ON\NW 2998\DIAMOND RIDGE i'.^OC
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING 3
33'
DATE: 6- 0
DA SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
INATING DEPT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Reconsideration of bituminous plant included in Restricted
Development Conditional Use Permit #98-05, for property located south of 40`" St. SIN,
west of T.H. 63.
March 1, 2000
Planning Staff Recommendation:
[i7
e —10—L
PREPARED BY:
Mitzi A. Baker,
Senior Planner
See attached staff report dated March 1, 2000
i
Council Action Needed:
If the Council wishes to proceed it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare resolution that can be
adopted supported by findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
stribution:
1. City Clerk
2. City Administrator
3. City Attorney: Legal Description attached
4. Planning Department File
5. John Arnold
6, Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on Monday March 6, 2000. in the Council/Board
Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th
Street SE.
I
li/ 11"
>UNCIL ACTION:
Aion By:
Seconded By: Action:
I
03- 02 00 r6:37 FAX 50; _2.87 LL--
RONALD L SEEGRR
MDTON A. ROSHNBLAD
PAUL A. FLISt M
DANIEL R. BERNVr
JOHN B. ARNOLD
PETSR C. SANDBrMG
TINA L. MOHR
JEFFREY A HANSON
RRNN M R. MORN
W1111AM J. RYAN
PAUL W. SUCHER
DOUGLASA. SORSE
F�ru�aryx
1 LAW OFFICES
DUNL" & SEEGER, P.A.
200 9007T RROADWAY• suns 600
MARQUETTE EANS RUILDINO
Po Box 60
ROCHR47ER, MUM180TA SM084W
TELSPHONX. (507) 90&9111
FAY rWV S0 -MO
PAY• (San 9B"12
ROOM A DUNLAP
1)r IM)
MITZI BAKER
OLMSTED COUNTY CONSOLIDATED PLANNIN i
2122 CAMPUS DRIVE SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904
RE: Restrictive Development Conditional 1 se Permit M98-05 as Amended
Franklin P. Kottschade
Dear Ms. Baker
33S
MAW H. DUNLAP
Wnj,IAM P. votXMAR
MARK E. FORM
KEN D. SCHUXLER
GREGORY J. GRIFrMM
MICHAEL S. D11M
RRIC D. LARSON
SHARON C. Zr=
titCMDOML
FRANRLIN MICHAELS
A.M.'SAXDr IMr H
Our firm represents Mr. Konschade concemutg the above referenced Restrictive Development
CUP. On March 31, 1999, the Cuntmon Council appro%ed the amended Restrictive
Development Conditional Use Pe„nit. Paragraph 11, of the Findings of Fact specifically
provided that the Council should review that portion of the permit concerning the operation of
the bituminous plant "no later" than July 2000. It was also specifically provided that the
review should come directly to the Council without payment of any application or tiling fee.
We would like to have the Council review the operation of the bituminous plant at this time in
preparation, for the 2000 construction season. rather than waiting until July 2000.
inc bituminous plant was not put into operation dannt::he 1 ^49 const:,letror. season..'�s a
consequence, we are not sure what the revic%k would consist of as there would be no
operational history, but we believe that under the terms of the amendment it is necessary to
have a review by the Council therefore w e are requesting that the matter be scheduled for a
review before the Common Council at its earliest Convenience. We are also requesting that the
permit for the operation of the bituminous plant be extended to coincide with the length of time
that the Restricted Development Conditional t 'se Permit 7N8-05 is in existence rather than
having continued reviews.
03- 02 00 t6:37 Fd.T 507 2S7_2Y7" ku n I;F�'I Tl ,�.q t� 003 003
i
Page 2
February 9.2000
As we discussed in our phone couversation. 'icing that this is not an application nor subject to a
filing fee and merely a review IN have adopted this format of requesting the review through
your offices.
Very
John B. Arnold
com
JBA/ck
cc Terry Adkins
Franklin Kottschade
DUNLAP & SF.EGFR. P.A.
33,
BEFORE THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
In Re: Restricted Development
Amendment to Findings of Fact,
Conditional Use Permit Conclusions of Law,
#98-05 by and Order
Franklin P. Kottschade
On March 15, 1999, the City of Rochester Common Council conducted a public hearing,
upon notice to the public, to consider the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation in
response to a request by Franklin P. Kottschade (hereinafter "Applicant") for a Type III, Phase II
Amendment to Restricted Development Conditional Use Permit #98-05. The amendment would
allow the Applicant to expand a granular material processing area on the south side of Willow
Creek by approximately 9.42 acres and to add a portable bituminous drum mixer facility. The
mining operation is generally located on a portion of the property bounded by 40" Street S.W.,
Trunk Highway 63 South, 11"Avenue S.W.,(hereinafter referred to as "Site").
On January 27, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing
and adopted a recommendation concerning the requested amendment. The Commission filed
its findings and recommendation with the Common Council pursuant to Section 60.532(4) of the
Rochester Code of Ordinances. This hearing resulted as required by R.C.O. §60.532(5).
At the hearing, Attorney John Arnold and other persons representing the Applicant
testified in favor of the Applicant's request. No one appeared in opposition to the request.
i
339
Based upon the evidence presented at both hearings, the Common Council of the City of
Rochester does hereby make the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This matter is properly before the Common Council pursuant to R.C.O. §60.532(5)
and Minn. Stat. §462.3595, subd. 2.
2. Franklin P. Kottschade applied for a Type ill, Phase II Amendment to Restricted
Development Conditional Use Permit #98-5 so as to allow for the following modifications to
Permit #98-5:
a) extension of the area designated for processing of granular materials by 9.4
acres to the west;
b) addition of a bituminous batch mixing plant, the location of which would be
limited to the most easterly part of the processing area and that includes the
following: addition of traffic associated with the bituminous plant,
processing of materials originating off -site as needed for producing and
processing the bituminous and an extension of the hours/days of operation
limitations for the bituminous plant from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday
through Friday that currently applies to processing on -site to allow the plan
to operate 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Friday and on Saturdays
as needed;
c) modification of haul roads; and
d) addition of stock pile locations
3. Multiple provisions of the Rochester Code of Ordinances apply in analyzing the
request.
4. R.C.O. §61.146 lists the standards for conditional use permits and reads as follows:
61.146 Standard for Conditional Uses: The zoning administrator, Commission or
council shall approve a development permit authorizing a conditional use unless one or
more of the following findings with respect to the proposed development is made:
2
339
1) Provisions for vehicular loading, unloading, parking and for vehicular and
pedestrian circulation on the site and onto adjacent public streets and ways will
create hazards to safety, or will impose a significant burden upon public facilities.
2) The intensity, location, operation, or height of proposed buildings and structures
will be detrimental to other private development in the neighborhood or will impose
undue burdens on the sewers, sanitary and storm drains, water or similar public
facilities.
3) The provision for on -site bufferyards and landscaping does not provide adequate
protection to neighboring properties from detrimental features of the development.
4) The site plan fails to provide for the soil erosion and drainage problems that may
be created by the development.
5) The provisions for exterior lighting create undue hazards to motorists traveling on
adjacent public streets or are inadequate for the safety of occupants or users of
the site or such provisions damage the value and diminish the usability of adjacent
properties.
6) The proposed development will create undue fire safety hazards by not providing
adequate access to the site, or to the buildings on the site, for emergency vehicles.
7) In cases where a Phase I plan has been approved, there is a substantial change in
the Phase II site plan from the approved Phase I site plan, such that the revised
plans will not meet the standards provided by this paragraph.
8) The proposed conditional use does not comply with all the standards applying to
permitted uses within the underlying zoning district, or with standards specifically
applicable to the type of conditional use under consideration, or with specific
ordinance standards dealing with matters such as signs which are part of the
proposed development, and a variance to allow such deviation has not been
secured by the applicant.
5. R.C.O. §61.147 states that in considering an application for a development permit
to allow a conditional use, the Council shall consider and may impose modifications or conditions
to the extent they are needed in ensure compliance with the criteria provided by R.C.O. §61.146.
3
3`40
6. R.C.O. §62.824 states that when reviewing a conditional use permit in any of the
flood districts, the following factors, in addition to the standards of R.C.O §61.146, shall also be
considered:
1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities
caused by encroachments.
2) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to
the injury of others.
3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these
systems to prevent disease, contamination and unsanitary condition.
4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage
and the effect of such damage on the individual owner.
5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the
community.
6) The need for a waterfront location for the facility.
7) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the
proposed use.
8) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and
development anticipated in the foreseeable future.
9) The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and flood
plain management program for the area.
10) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and
emergency vehicles.
11) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment
transport of the flood waters expected at the site.
12) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of Paragraph 62.800.
4
3�1
7. Other ordinances that apply to this request include Sections 62.1006 and 52.1010.
8. Following its January 27, 1999, public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission considered the testimony, applied the applicable criteria and recommended
approval subject to the following five conditions:
(1) Report dates included on the supplemental report do not coincide with
report dates on file with the Planning Department. The Applicant shall
correct dates or clarify with staff the reason for the discrepancies. Also,
corrections to the report be made that refer to available access to Highway
63 since no permits have been issued by the Minnesota Department of
Transportation for the mining/processing uses;
(2) The Applicant shall provide proof of approval from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation to utilize access directly to Highway 63 for
this use;
(3) Importation of materials for processing be limited only to that necessary for
the bituminous batch plant/bituminous production;
(4) All conditions, modifications or restrictions applied to conditional use permits
previously approved remain in effect except for the extension of hours/days
of operation applied to the bituminous plant which may operate from 7am-
7pm, Monday through Friday and on Saturdays as needed;
(5) Additional signage and warning signals be utilized along 40" Street S.W.,
and Highway 63 to maximize safety and identify slow moving trucks within
the area;
(6) Access to 4V Street S.W., east of Willow Creek, is temporary and direct
access to Highway 63 for mining/processing uses has not been approved or
issued by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The Applicant shall
identify alternative access routes and haul road accesses to public
roadways that may be utilized if the current accesses shown on the Plan
are not available for use in the future;
(7) A wetland investigation shall be completed and approved for portions of the
Site not previously field -reviewed by the local government unit and the
Applicant shall obtain a No Loss Certificate, exemption or approved
replacement plan prior to disturbing the area;
5
(8) Revised plans be submitted to the Planning Department that correctly
reflect previous approvals and that include any modifications required
through this amendment.
9. At the March 15° Common Council public hearing, Attorney Arnold and the City
Attorney mutually agreed that the seventh condition should be amended to read as follows:
(7) Subject to the final result of any declaratory judgment action which may be
fled concerning this issue, a wetland investigation shall be completed and
approved for portions of the Site not previously field -reviewed by the local
government unit and the Applicant shall obtain a No Loss Certificate,
exemption or approved replacement plan prior to disturbing the area.
10. At the March 15' Common Council public hearing, Attorney Arnold testified that
the Applicant agreed to all seven conditions, including the seventh condition as amended, and
agreed to a ninth condition that should read as follows:
(9) When the bituminous plant is operating, other adjacent mining operations
would not be operating so as to minimize truck traffic.
11. Council member Hansen indicated that the Council should review that portion of
the request concerning the operation of the bituminous plant no later than July of 2000. That
review should come directly to the Council without payment of any application or filing fee.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. This matter is properly before the Common Council pursuant to R.C.O. §60.532
and Minn. Stat. §462.3595.
6
343
2. By a preponderance of the evidence presented, the Common Council determines that
there is a legal basis to approve the amendment to Restricted Development Conditional Use
Permit #98-05 to allow the expansion of a granular material processing area on the south side of
Willow Creek by approximately 9.42 acres and to add a portable bituminous drum mixer facility if
the Applicant complies with nine conditions, as amended.
3. By a preponderance of the evidence presented, the Council determines that the
nine conditions should be imposed, pursuant to Section 61.147, to ensure compliance with
R.C.O. §§61.146, 62.824, 62.708 and 62.824.
ORDER
The Common Council of the City of Rochester, pursuant to R.C.O. §§60.532(5), 61.146,
32.708, 62.824, 62.1006 and 62.1010 does hereby approve the amendment to Restricted
Development Conditional Use Permit #98-05 so as to expand a granular material processing
area on the south side of Willow Creek by approximately 9.42 acres and to add a portable
bituminous drum mixer facility subject to the nine conditions listed above.
Dated at Rochester, Minnesota this -3%st day of March, 1999.
_0-dusel . a.md9a5. t__
`fin-.� /�✓ c < < � , �-d� �---
L�ohn Hunziker, President of the
Rochester City Council
7
AGENDA SECTION:
PLBLIC HEARINGS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
PLA-N-.NTNG
i
`,1EE7NG 3 S0
DATE: ) 3-66-1
ITEM NO.
c-, -13
EM DESCRIPTION: Annexation by Ordinance Petition #00.05 by Payne Company to annex PREPARED BY:
approximately 6.40 acres of land located along the south side of Viola Road NE (CSAH 2). Theresa Fogarty,
east of Century Hills Drive NE. The property is located in the NW114. Section 29, Haverhill Planner
Township.
March 2, 2000
City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation:
The City Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this annexation request on February 23, 2000. The Commission found that this
property is adjacent to the city limits and can be served by City services. The Planning Commission therefore recommends approval of
this request.
Motion by Ms. Peterssonto approve Annexation Petition #00-05 by Payne Company.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Werven. The motion carried 7-0.
Planning Department Recommendation:
See attached staff report, dated February 16, 2000.
Minnesota Statutes now specify that the property taxes payable in the year an annexation is effective shall be paid to the Township.
For the five years following the annexation, the City must make a cash payment to the Township equaling 90%, 70%, 50%, 30% and
10% of the Townships share of the taxes in the year the property was annexed. The Township Taxes on this property for 1999 is $.07.
Council Action Needed:
Following the public hearing, if the Council wishes to proceed as petitioned, it should
instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to be adopted and transmitted to the MN
Planning /Office of Strategic and Long Range Planning.
Distribution:
1. City Administrator
2. City Clerk
3. City Attorney: Legal Description Attached
4. City Finance Director: Tax Information Attached
5. Planning Department File
6. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on
Rochester! Olmsted County Government Center.
7. Yaggy Colby Associates
Monday, March 6, 2000 in the Council Chambers at the
COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by:__to:
`III_'• lrsi a
dVW Nf X3NNV
� � � 9 1 ;j i-� v1053NNiw aa153HJOa T
C1NIHl S3WOHNMOI SIIIH aniN37
1� I,
Y Y_
2N
z
o NR
i
x u
U'
1
e
S— "..
Al
I
-�(
r
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Theresa Fogarty, Planner p
DATE: February 16, 2000
xV,klh )
,tTF
iq., ,. =,, • .,ter,--<�-.'-.�''•
CRj TF D.�A L GL't•.,.
ROCHESTER-OLMSTED
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2122 CAMPUS DR SE
ROCHESTER MN 55904-4744
ADMINISTRATION/
507/285-8232
PLANNING
GISiADDRESSING/
507/285-8232
MAPPING
HOUSINGMRA
507/285-8224
BUILDING CODE
507/285-8213
WELL SEPTIC
507/285-8345
FAX
5071287.2275
RE: Annexation Petition #00-05 by Payne Company to annex approximately
6.40 acres of land located along the south side of Viola Road NE
(CSAH 2), east of Century Hills Drive NE. The property is located in the
NW1i4 Section 29, Haverhill Township.
Planning Department Review:
Applicants/Owners: Payne Company
1700 Northwood Drive NE
Rochester, MN 55906
Location of Property: The property is located south of Viola Road NE (CSAH 2)
and east of Century Hills Drive NE.
Existing Land Use: This property is vacant, undeveloped land.
Size: The property proposed for annexation is approximately
6.40 acres of unplatted land.
Existing Zoning: The property is zoned A-4 (Agricultural Urban Expansion)
District on the Olmsted County zoning map.
Future Zoning:
Upon annexation, the property will be zoned R-1 (Mixed
Single Family Residential) district on the Rochester zoning
map. The applicant has filed a zone change to R-1 x for the
southwest portion of this annexation.
Land Use Plan:
This property is designated for "low density residential" uses
on the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan.
Adjacency to the Municipal
The property is adjacent to the city limits along its north, west
Limits:
and east boundaries and a portion of its southern boundary.
�� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Page 2
nnexation 900-05
ebruary 14, 2000
Sewer & Water: The Northeast High Level Water System service is available
to this property.
Municipal sewer and water will need to be extended to serve
this area.
Townboard Review: Minnesota State Statutes require that the Townboard
members receive a written notice, by certified mail, 30 days
prior to the public hearing. The City Council will hold a public
hearing on this item on March 6, 2000. The City Clerk has
sent the certified notice 30 days prior to the hearing date.
Referral Comments: RPU Operations Division, RPU Water Division, Rochester
Public Works
Report Attachments:
Staff Recommendation:
1. Annexation Map
2. Location Map
3. Referral Comments (3 letters)
This property is adjacent to the City limits and can be served by city services upon extension of the sanitary
sewer and water lines from their present ends. The Planning staff recommends that the City proceed to
adopt an ordinance annexing the property according to Minnesota Statutes 414.033, Subdivision 2 (3).
ROCHESTEK
Minnesota
Z/7/00
TO: Consolidated Planning Department
2122 Campus Drive SE
Rochester, MN 55904
FROM: Michael J. Nigbur ,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
2010 Street SE Room 108
Rochester, MN 55904-3740
507-287-7800
FAX — 507-281-6216
The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for
ANNX00-05 on the Payne Company property (6.4 acres / Century Hills). The
following are Public Works comments on the proposal:
Municipal sewer and water is available to serve this area
C1TEMPWNNEX00-0S.doc
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING 591 .
DATE: : 6 00
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY ADMINISTRATOR i
ITEM DESCRIPTION: PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AIRPORT EXEMPT
PREPARED BY:
FACILITY BONDS FOR AIRBORNE EXPRESS
G. NEUNL-k.N 1
MDC of Lenexa. Kansas, the developer for Airborne Express, has requested that the City consider the issuance
of 51 million in Tax Exempt Facility Bonds. The bond proceeds would be used for the construction of a 15.4. 7
sq. ft. facility located on 58,089 sq. ft. of land leased at the Rochester Airport. This facility would allow
Airborne to expand their operations in Rochester.
The proposed bonds to be issued are similar to industrial revenue bonds. They are an obligation of the applicant
and are not a financial responsibility of the City of Rochester. Both the applicant, MDC, Inc. (Midwest
Development & Construction, Inc.), and the Underwriter, GE Capital Public Finance, Inc., have experience with
similar airport facility projects.
A copy of the application submitted by MDC, Inc. has been provided to the Mayor and Council separate from
the agenda due to its length.
The staff is recommending approval.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt resolution approving up to S1 million in Exempt Facility Bonds for the Airborne Express project at
L Rochester Airport.
,.OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by second by: to:
Sent oy: RRIGGS MORGAN ST PAuI �;�'. .i! n4 �(',; ^:1:'.)3:^-0 '9:a' ojjq
Fi; -ye 4j43
EXTRACT OF MiNUTEr OF A MEETING OF THR
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROCHESTF.R, AINNESOTA
Pursuant to clue cal! and nor.ice Thereof, a regular or
special meeting of the Common Council of the City of Rochester,
Minnesota, was duly held in the Roche: • Hall on March 6,
2000, commencing at ') 00 P.M
The following Counrilmembe
and the following were absenr
��♦ tr♦ ate•
During said meeting
moved the adopted of the following Resolution: a
RESOLUTTON NO.
RESOLLTTON
GTVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A FROJECT AND THE TSSUANCE OF
RRVENUE BONt)S FOR '71[E PROJECT
WHEREAS, MDC Rochester, f,C, a Kansas limited Liability
corporation (the "Company"), has proposed that the City issue its
Airport Exempt Facilir.y Reverue Bonds, Series 2000, or similar
obligations, in one or more series, in the approximate aggregate
principal amount of $1,000,000 (the "Bonds") to finance the
construction, furnishing and equipping of and site improvements for
an air cargo facility at the Rochester Airport ;the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Ccuuai1 held a public hearing on the proposal of
the Company on the date hereof at which all persons wishing to do
so were afforded an opportunity to present their oral or written
comments; and
WHEREAS, neither the full taith and credit nor taxinq powers
of the City will be pledged to the Project or for the payment of
the principal of, premium, if eny, and interest on the Bonds, which
will instead be payab[A solely from revwnues and/or other funds or
security provided solely by or on behalf of the Company:
NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RRSOLVED by the Common Council of the
City of Rochester, Mirinasota, an tollows,
1:439U1 I
1 "t 6-14
3. 6- oo AJu-�-
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
1. APPLICANT:
a. Business Name:
MDC Rochester, LLC
b. Business Address: 11401 Strang Line Road
Lenexa, KS 66215
c. Business Form (corporation, partnership, etc.): Kansas Limited Liability Corporation
d. Parent Organization (if any): None
e. Authorized Representative: Jerry Dean
Phone: 913-327-7677
2. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF MAJOR STOCKHOLDERS OR PRINCIPALS:
a. Jerry Dean 11401 Strang Line Road, Lenexa, KS 66215
b. Clay Kenmore / Atlantic United Construction, Inc.
1475 Klondike Road, Suite 200, Conyers, Georgia
3, GIVE BRIEF HISTORY OF BUSINESS (INCLUDING PAST OWNERSHIP DATA),
DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF BUSINESS AND PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS:
Jerry Dean has successfully developed properties throughout the United States. He has
developed at numerous airports and has a clear appreciation and understanding of airport
needs and airport development. In addition to his airport development experience in
MDC's corporate headquarters town of Kansas City, he has successfully developed and
constructed over 1,000,000 square feet of commercial properties. In addition to the
development business MDC provides property management services for over 500,000
square feet of commercial property.
The following is a representative listing of our airport development experience:
Hector International Airport
Fargo, ND
Airborne Express Facility
Contact: Shawn A. Dobberstein,
Executive Director
701-241-1501
Wichita Mid -Continent Airport
Wichita, KS
Airborne Facility & Federal
Express Facility
Contact: Bailis Bell
Director of Airports
316-946-4700
City of Rochester, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
Page 2 of 5
• Forbes Field
Topeka,Kansas
Airborne Facility
Contact: David A. Stremming
President
785-862-2362
Colorado Springs Airport
Colorado Springs, CO
Airborne Facility
Contact: Mr. Gary Green
Director of Aviation
719-550-1900
4. PURPOSE OF REQUESTED FINANCING:
a. New facility (describe):
Mather Airport
Sacramento, CA
Airborne Facility
Contact: Larry Kozub
Airport Manager
916-855-5577
The Project consists of an Airborne Express air cargo facility located at Rochester
International Airport in the City of Rochester, MN. The building will be a 15,437
square -foot facility located on 58,089 square feet of land, located contiguous to a
concrete aircraft ramp reserved exclusively for air cargo operation. The building will
be a metal frame building with architectural metal panel sidewalls on all exposures.
The building interior will consist of approximately 2,091 square feet of general offices,
open work areas and employee facilities. Drive-in loading doors for delivery van and
direct aircraft access as well as dock -high doors accommodating over -the -road tractor -
trailers will access the distribution portion of the building. Exterior improvements
include extensive concrete paving for auto parking and tractor -trailer loading and
maneuvering. Landscaping will include front and side easement consisting of various
indigenous trees and shrubs, with attractive green areas.
Expansion (describe):
The requested bond funding is for new construction only no expansion of existing
facilities is included.
Estimated project cost
i. Land n/a
ii. Buildings $1,000,000.00
iii. Equipment n/a
iv. Other n/a
Total Improvements & Equipment $1,000,000.00
c
City of Rochester, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
Page 3 of 5
5. BOND ISSUE:
a. Amount of Proposed Bond Issue: $1,000,000.00
b. Proposed Date of Sale: March 1, 2000
c. Length of Bond Issue and Proposed Maturities: 15 year bond with corresponding
maturities.
d. Describe Any Interim Financing Sought or Avail able: none
e. Describe Nature and Amount of any ?ermanent Financing in Addition to Bond
Financing: none
6. HAVE YOU APPLIED FOR CONVENTIONAL FINANCING?
a. Yes Describe:
b. No Why Not? We have utilized this method of financing at other airport locations.
Airports are a specific development that requires specialized financing mechanisms.
BUSINESS PROFILE:
a. Are you located in the City of Rochester now? yes
b. Number of employees in Rochester -
c. Before this project - 16
i. After this project - Up to 40 without expansion
d. Approximate annual sales — see attached Airborne Financials
e. Length of time in business — see attached Airborne information
;t
in Rochester -
f. Do you have plants in other locations? If so, where?
i. Airborne Express has locations throughout the world.
g. Are you engaged in international trade? yes
City of Rochester, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
Page 4 of 5
8. NAMES OF:
a. Underwriter- GE Capital Public Finance, Inc.
i. Has preliminary financial analysis by underwriter required by City been completed
and attached to this application?
See attached information from GE Capital Public Finance, Inc.
ii. Is underwriter's letter of commitment attached to this application? Yes
c. Bond Counsel - Mr. James Omera
Briggs and Morgan
2200 First National Bank Bldg.
322 Minnesota Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101
i. Tax Counsel - Mr. Normal E. Gaar
McDowell, Rice, Smith & Gaar
7101 College Boulevard, Suite 200
Overland Park, KS 66210
Phone: 1-913-338-5400
c. Corporate Counsel - Mr. Albert Kuhl
Attorney at Law
13000 W. 87�h Street, Suite 100
Lenexa, KS 66215
Phone: 1-913-438-2760
d. Accountant - Mr. Kevin Kieefer
Pratt , Kieefer & Company
9381 W. 75tr' Street
Overland Park, KS 66204
Phone: 1-913-648-5005
e. Name and address of suggested trustee and paying agent?
GE Capital handles all trustee issues.
City of Rochester, Minnesota
Application for Industrial Development Bond Project Financing
Page 5 of 5
9. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN IN BANKRUPTCY? DEFAULTED ON ANY BOND OR
MORTGAGE COMMITMENT? NO
If so, give details
10. WHAT IS YOUR TARGET DATE FOR:
a. Construction start —
b. Construction completion —
April 1, 2000 weather permitting
September 1, 2000
11. DO YOU HAVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ZONING AND CONSTRUCTION TYPE?
The airport has indicated the Airborne use is consistent airport use.
12,FINANCIAL REFERENCES:
a. Bank Mr. Joseph Close
Mercantile Bank
1101 Walnut , Suite 700
Kansas City, MO 64106
b. Mortgage Mr. Dick Davis
Director of Public Finance
Municipal Financial Group
c. Other ID Bonds, if any (give name of Trustee)
None
MDC Rochester, LLC
APP1LICANT
JA
1-816-871-2315
1-800-765-1011
0
January 4, 2000
Mr. Jerry S. Dean
President
Midwest Development & Construction, Inc.
11401 Strang Line Road
Lenexa, KS 66215
Dear Mr. Dean:
:aafa'Puolic Financa, fnc.
;t -a Ceseral Berri Capital Corcnrawn
34"9 Ncrrnandale Lake Boulevard. Suite 470
V: reapclls. MN 55437.1079
5'27 275800, Far. 612 89756u 1
GE Capital
GE Capital is pleased to submit the following tax-exempt financing proposal for your review and
acceptance:
Transaction Structure: Tax-exempt, Exempt Facility Bond
Issuer/Project Location: City of Rochester, NIi T / Rochester, N N
Borrower: Midwest Development & Construction, Inc. or its Assigns
Tenant: Airborne Freight Corporation
Lender: GE Capital, through its wholly -owned subsidiary known as GE Capital
Public Finance, Inc. or its Assigns or Nominees. ("GECPF")
Bond Amount: $1,000,000
Project: The proceeds of the bond issue will be used to finance an air cargo facility
which will be owned by Borrower and occupied by Tenant. The term of
the ground lease agreement between Borrower and Issuer will exceed the
term of the bonds. In addition, the lease agreement between Borrower
and Tenant will exceed the term of the bonds and the lease payments will
be sufficient to fully amortized the bonds,
Closing Date: On or before July 1, 2000, but not prior to execution of Issuer's
Documents.
Term and Payment: Fifteen (15) years, monthly payments in arrears.
January 4, 2000
Page 2
Fired Interest Rate: The interest rate as of the date of this proposal is 6.18%.
MARKET INDEX OPTION: The interest rate as of the date of this
proposal is 6.18% (based on a 7-year Treasury of 6.52% for the week
ended December 31, 1999): Borrower has the option to adjust to the
change in market condition (56% of the change in the 7-year treasury as
reported on the Federal Reserve Bank's Release H.15). The rate at the
time of funding will then be fixed for the term of the financing.
RATE LOCK OPTION: The Borrower has the option to lock the
interest rate for funding (funds closed into an escrow account) that occur
on or before 90 days from the date of this proposal or any subsequent
date the customer chooses to exercise the option to fix the interest rate
(the "Rate Lock Date). If the Borrower locks the rate and the transaction
does not close (documents executed) by the Rate Lock Date, the interest
rate will increase by 3 basis points per month retroactive back to the date
of the Borrower's election to lock the interest rate.
Real Estate Advance Rate $1,000,000: GECPF's advance rate will be 90% of the purchase price or
cost to construct (which cost specifically excludes developer's overhead
and any leasing fees not paid to independent third parties), or 75% of
appraised value per MAI appraisal (subject to GECPF's approval and
selection), whichever is less. Any additional advance, if requested by the
borrower, will require additional collateral secured by a perfected UCC-1
showing lender a first secured party with no additional liens or
encumbrances on the equipment, or a Letter of Credit acceptable to
GECPF. The amortization of any additional advance will be appropriate
to the useful life of any additional collateral pledged at GECPF's sole
discretion. Funding for the Real Estate will be based on final completion
of the project. If construction financing is requested, it shall be secured by
a Letter of Credit.
Security for the Bond: Real Estate will be secured by a first deed of trust or first mortgage on
the Borrower's fee simple interest in the real property and improvements
thereon generally described as IvEdwest Development & Construction,
Inc. facility located in Rochester, MN ("Property"). Borrower shall
execute a (1) Loan Agreement and either (2a) a Deed of Trust, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing or (2b) a Mortgage, Security Agreement
and Fixture Filing, plus other documentation and financing statements
deemed necessary by GECPF which shall evidence a first lien covering all
leases, rents, security deposits and personal property owned by Borrower
and from time to time installed and/or used in the maintenance and
operation of the Property.
January 4, 2000
Page 3
No secondary financing or liens will be permitted, and the entire balance
of the loan will be due on sale. GECPF will also have assignment of
lease between Borrower and Tenant as well as assignment of lease
between Borrower and Issuer (ground lease). Such leases will be subject
to review and approval by GECPF and will be for a minimum term of
fifteen years.
Call Provision. The Borrower will have the option to prepay this financing in whole, but
not in part, on any payment date after thirty-six months from the date of
closing. In the event the Borrower elects this option, a premium of 2% of
the outstanding principal balance shall be due in addition to the principal
amount.
This proposal is based upon the following additional terms and conditions:
1. Net Financing Agreement: Borrower will be responsible for all expenses, maintenance, insurance
and taxes (other than taxes based solely on the net income of GECPF) relating to the purchase,
possession and use of the Project.
2. Insurance: Borrower or Tenant, at its own expense, will provide casualty, liability and other
insurance in such amounts as GECPF may from time to time require and provide satisfactory
evidence of the same prior to any loan closing. In flood and earthquake hazard areas, GECPF may
require appropriate coverage for such perils. All policies must be in accordance with GECPF's
requirements and from companies that are acceptable to GECPF. Each policy shall include GECPF
as loss payee and additional insured and include all endorsements which GECPF may reasonably
require.
3. Appraisal: GECPF shall require a current appraisal be conducted on the Property. Such appraisal
shall be conducted by an MAI certified appraiser acceptable to GECPF and which is also contracted
for and directed by GECPF. Any loan disbursement shall be subject to satisfactory review by GE
Capital of the appraisal and its conclusions.
4. Title and Survey: Borrower shall furnish GECPF with an ALTA Loan Policy of Title Insurance
(including all required endorsements) insuring GECPF's interest. Borrower shall also furnish
GECPF with a current ALTA title survey by a registered public surveyor. Both the title insurance
and survey must be in a form and substance satisfactory to GECPF and the title insurer.
5. Environmental Survey: GECPF shall require a Phase I environmental study be conducted on the
Property the results of which must be satisfactory to GECPF. Said study shall be conducted by a
firm acceptable to GECPF and its direction.
6. Site Inspection: GECPF shall require that one of its representatives conduct an on -site inspection
of the Property the results of which must be acceptable to GECPF. GECPF may also require that an
independent consulting engineer also make an Inspection of the Property.
January 4, 2000
Page 4
7. Documentation: GECPF will provide and require loan/security agreement documentation plus all
applicable and required supporting documentation for this transaction. Such documentation will
also include a cross collateralization and cross default provision with certain existing or proposed
GECPF equipment loans and/or leases or lien on related personal property. All documents shall be
subject to the approval of GECPF and its counsel.
8. Transaction Costs: Borrower shall be responsible for all of GECPF's out-of-pocket expenses
including, without limitation, outside legal fees, appraisal fees, site visit fees, environmental study
fees, consulting engineer fees, escrow, recording and transfer fees and taxes, title charges, UCC
search and fling fees, survey costs, and all other costs incurred whether the loan is closed or not.
Upon acceptance of this proposal by Borrower, GECPF will engage appraiser and an environmental
assessment firm at Borrower's expense. Borrower shall be responsible for all its own costs and
expenses.
9. Lenders Legal Review: The Document must be reviewed and approved by GECPF's legal counsel
and any changes to the Document must be approved by GECPF's legal counsel and the Issuer. The
fee for review will be charged to the Borrower for documentation, overnight mail and filing fees.
Lenders Legal Review is $12,500. This review fee is due after GECPF's credit approval process is
complete and Borrower is presented with an approval letter containing terms and conditions
acceptable to Borrower. This fee is not refundable after this point.
10. Bond Counsel, Borrower's Counsel and Issuance Costs: Borrower will be responsible for all
costs it incurs with respect to the transaction including, but not limited to, issuance costs from the
issuer and its bond counsel.
11. Coven an ts/Restrictions: Financial covenants and ownership restrictions may be required based on
GECPF investment review and analysis.
12. Good Faith Deposit: In addition to the Lenders Legal Review costs outlined above, the Borrower
is required to remit a non -interest bearing Good Faith Deposit of $ 10,000. This Deposit will be
returned to the Borrower, less expenses referred to above, (i) in the event that GECPF does not
approve this proposal, (ii) upon closing into escrow, which includes receipt of all properly executed
documentation, title insurance and recorded originals of all loan documents, the balance of the
Deposit will be applied to the initial payment(s) due under the financing agreement, (iii) in the event
that GECPF and the Borrower fail to agree upon a material provision of the bond documentation,
(iv) upon GECPF's termination of this proposal because of a material adverse change in the
Borrower's'or guarantor's financial condition. If this transaction is not closed by the Closing Date,
or any mutual extension of the Closing Date, then GECPF will retain the Deposit as liquidated
damages.
13. Other Conditions: This proposal is based upon preliminary information supplied by Borrower. In
the event that GECPF, based upon its review and in its sole discretion, approves this transaction, an
approval letter will be issued setting forth the terms and conditions of the transaction.
January 4, 2000
Page 5
14 Year 2000 Compliant: All of the terms and conditions of this proposal have been made on the
assumption that the assets related hereto are Year 2000 Compliant. The term "Year 2000
Compliant" shall mean that the assets have been designed and/or engineered such that they will, on
or after the date December 31, 1999, continue to fully function in the manner intended, and perform
all of the duties that they are intended to fulfill, by the user thereof on the commencement of the
transaction contemplated by this proposal.
This proposal is an expression by GE Capital of its interest in considering a financing transaction on the
general terms and conditions outlined above. This proposal is not intended to and does not create any
binding legal obligation on the part of either party. THIS PROPOSAL IS NOT, AND IS NOT TO BE
CONSTRUED AS, A COMMITMENT BY GE CAPITAL OR ANY OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES TO
ENTER INTO THE PROPOSED FINANCING TRANSACTION. Neither GE Capital, nor any of its
subsidiaries, will be obligated to provide any financing until the satisfactory completion of its investment
review and analysis, the receipt of all requisite approvals by GE Capital's management, and the prior
execution and delivery of final documentation acceptable to all parties and their counsels.
By accepting this proposal, Borrower acknowledges that this letter contains the entire proposal
(superseding all previous representations and agreements, either oral or written) and that there are no
promises, agreements or understandings outside of this letter.
Please acknowledge your consent to the terms outlined above by signing a copy of this letter and
returning it, along with the Lenders Legal Review and Good Faith Deposit, on or before the expiration
of this proposal on January 14, 2000.
Sincerely,
aGE CAPIT.4L Public Finance, Inc.
Ae4llz
vfichael J. Hamel
Business Development Manager
PROPOS? ACCEPTED BY:
Title: i { n s, �V�_
A Y6=_,�
Mark W. Beardslee
Vice President -Account Executive
Borrower elects rate lock l>n (initial)
Date: / — /0 - o a Fed. I.D. n:
Sent ❑y: BBIGGS MORSAN t; 'A-
1, On the basis of inlnrmat 1011 provided to the City 1t
ommon Council hereby fLeds
appears, and the Conal, used
project constitutes properties, real and p
or useful in connection wish one or more revenue
producing eniPrprises within the meaning of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469 151, Subdivision 2(b)
2_ in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469,154.
Subdivision 1, the Mayor And City Clerk are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Briggs and Morgan n
submiMinnesota
artmect of
Trade tand Economic Developmentsn
("DTED") foritps approval.
3. The issuance of the Bonds is hereby given preliminary
approval; provided that the adoption of this resolution
by the City does not constitute a guarantee or a firm
commitment that the City will issue the Bonds as
requested by the Company The ( t.y reserves the right, in
its sole discretion, to withdraw from partlC Lpation and
accordingly not issue any Bonds to finance the Project at
any time prior to the adopt.ioa of the final resolution
authorizing the issuance of inch Bonds should the City fo
determine Based on the representations of the companyr
the Project, would not be undertaken but for tie
availability of indu:;rriat development bonding.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY "PHE COMMON COi7NCTL OF THE CITY OF
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, "I,mrS 6" .)AY OF MARCH, 2000,
pRFS1T)ENT OF SAiU COMMON
ATTEST: COUNCi I,
CITY CLERK
Approved this _ day of March. 2000.
(Seal of the City of MAYOR OF SAID ..^.LTY
Rochester,. Minnesota)
Councilmember _ _ moved the adoption of
the foregoing resolution, which mutt andwarupondvote uly sbeingettaken
Councilmember —
thereon, the tollowinq_ _ Councilmembers voted in favor thex eo
and the following r'ouncilmembers voted against the same:
wan declarers duly passed on adopted.
whereupon said resolution
1143901.1
Sent by: RRIGGS MORGAN Si ❑AUl
;e '2l'3
GE Cdpital
February 7, 2000
City of Rochester
Attn: City Clerk
201 4` Street SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Re: City of Rochester, Minnesota - S1,000,000 Aitport Exempt Facility Revenue
Bonds, Series 2000 (MDC Rochester, LLC Project)
Ladies and Gentlemen -
As part of its business, GE Capital Public Finance, Inc. ("GECPF"), a subsidiary of
General Electric Capital Corporation, purchases tax exempt qualified small issue bonds.
GECPF has had discussions with MDC Rochester, 1.1 .(' regarding the purchase of bonds
proposed in a maximum amount of S 1,000,000 to be issued by City of Rochester to
finance the construction of an air cargo facility by MDC Rochester, LLC to be located in
Rochester, MN.
Based on these discussions, GECPF is pleased to confirm its interest in purchasing the
bonds. This letter, however, does not constitute a commitment to purchase the bonds.
Any such commitment would tequire the prior approval of GECPF's credit committee
and the negotiation of documents acceptable to GECPF and its counsel. This letter
expresses the intent of GECPF to continue its discussions with MDC Rochester, LLC and
to seek the approvals necessary to authorize its purchase of the bonds.
Please contact Mike Hanze)•at (612) 897-5672, if you have any questions.
Very y yours,
Phi Long
Vice President
Sent ny. ?R'. SCS !JCR A% , A—
from-lt R S G
February 4, 2000
1133591033 '-63E P 02/023;!557
MDC mc•
tRYDM'SSTD�v[t.Orbirwr a CONS "111 014
Gary Neumann
Assistant City Administrator
City of Rochester Minnesota
City Administrator's Office
201 4th Street SE, Room 266
Rochester, MN 55904-3781
Re: Airborne Express Project
Rochester Intem*ional Airport
Dear Gary Neumann,
In regards to the Airport l-xempt Facility Bonds being proposed for the Airborne
Express station to be located at the Rochester International Airport. Due to the
specialized nature of airport developmvnt and the costs associated thereof, it is
necessary to utilize Airpon Exempt Facility Bonds to achieve an acceptable cost
structure for Airborne.
In the event Airport Exempt Facility Bonds are not utilized our proposed cost
structure cannot be achieved and Airborne will not have economic approval to
move the project forward.
We look forward to proceeding with the Airborne project. Please let us know 0
we can be of any further assistance -
Moe, Inc.
cc: Jim Cunningham Airborne Froight Corporation
114K SU=g Line Rd. enw-- XS WOO& 91YM-7677 • FAX 91.3 37.1147
DexO7 • Btdd • La"s • F1AQliCe
AGENDA SECTION:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ORIGINATING DEPT:
Public Works
MEETING
DATE: 316/00
ITEM NO.
f,- - t
if EM DESCRIPTION: Permit Parking Petition 2nd Street NW / 700 Block PREPARED BY:
,4,n D. Rossman
This is a Public Hearing to establish Permit Parking on this block. The City has received a petition from the
residents of this block to control all day parking on their street. The petition is for "Residential Permit Parkins
on both side of 2"d Street NW / 700 Block, between the hours of 7:00am to 5:001)m, Monday thru Friday.
The petition Has been analyzed in the following 4 areas:
1) Is this area residential in nature? Yes
2) Is the zone requested at least 32 dwelling unit in size? Yes, this is part on the Kutzky zone, which is bounded
by 6' Avenue on the east, First Street on the south, l 1 ' Avenue on the west, and Cascade Creek on the north.
Two other streets in the zone presently have Permit Parking. Other petitions are expected to be submitted
very soon.
3) Is the street congested with parking from an outside source? Yes, the street is congested with cars parking on
both sides of the streets on weekdays, acid is mainly students from Lourdes High School and employees from
the medical center.
4) Is the petition signed by 60% of the residents or landowners? Yes. 10 of I 1 residents (90%).
Additional information: 2nd Street /700 block is 35 feet wide on a 75 foot R/W. It is a one-way west bound street.
Average traffic volumes are around 1,300 vehicles per day. There are two existing restrictions on the block. One
can be removed that restricts parking on one side from 3pmMonday to 7pm Tuesday. The other is a Passenger
Loading Zone for a daycare at 711 2nd Street. This will be still be needed when the permit parking signs are
installed. The petition has been discussed with the City Police Department and they have no objection as long as
the existing 3pm to 7pm restriction is removed. This has proved to be very confusing in other areas of the City
and petitioners are wishing to have it removed here. Staff recommends approving the request.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt the prepared resolution" making the following changes to the Comprehensive Traffic & Parking
Resolution Book:
A) adding paragraph (3) to Zone 48 (Kutzky Addition) of section L "Residential Permit Parking to read:
(3)2 Id Street NW / 700 block, on both sides of the street, from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday thru
Friday
B) amend paragraphs (49.5) and (50.5) of section B "No Parking Zones" to read:
(49.5) 2"d Street NW on the north side of the street in the 600 and 800 blocks, except from 7:00 pm
Monday to 3:00 pm Tuesday.
(50.5) 2"d Street NW on the south side of the street in the 600 and 800 blocks, from 7:00 pm Monday
to 3:00 pm Tuesday.
OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to:
i,9179
ell
v a: a'FO I. i7 Nay. 7T7r
a gr-ir
\,l
a� ., f
______—_____ _J_�_i ---_ -�
1-----�------ •--I-Im
- ---
_
I
-- ---i 3 ST.
I I m Z -
---- w 3
---- -
4r-, Z > Z
J w
war
iHIM
z
2
a
a
I
a+
>
r` 1'
, e
i I I
I
i
I
CITY OF ROCHESTER,MN
PERMIT PARKING
ZONE X-- 8
Pew kke p l et•t `a r
2u 6 s+ ►JLJ /70 J r3QL
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
,OJ40-/ !
bIEETING r7`A
DATE u3-Ii0-110
AGENDA SECTION:
' IEARINGS
ORIGINATING DEPT:
CITY AD%IINISTRATION
rEM DESCRIPTION:
.amend the 1998 .action Plan for the City of Rochester's Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Program
March 1, 2000
I I tM NU.. /
L �110
PREPARED BY:
Theresa Foizarr.
CDBG Admmtstrator
The City of Rochester is proposing to provide $50,000 of CDBG funding to the Rochester Area
Foundation for the First Homes Program. The CDBG funding will be used to assist with the cost
of developing 875 affordable single family homes and 375 rental townhomes, within the next five
years.
The City of Rochester proposes to reallocate the following CDBG funding:
1998 Downtown Commercial Residential Rental Rehab Program: $49,333.33
1998 Downtown Commercial Residential Rental Rehab Program Income: $ 666.67
A balance of $49,875.04 will remain in the 1998 Downtown Commercial Residential Rental
Rehabilitation Program for existing projects and any future projects.
Council Action Needed:
1. Approve amending 1998 Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant,
allocating $50,000 to the Rochester Area Foundation for the First Homes Program.
Distribution:
1 City Administrator
2. City Clerk
3. CDBG File
COU NCI L ACTION: Molionby: Second
l; � F/R S T f ■
21 First Street SW, Suite 350
Rochester, MN 35902
January 12, 1999
John Hunziker
City of Rochester
201 4th Street SE
Rochester, MN 55904
Dear John:
Thank you for your and the City Council's leadership in becoming a financial
supporter of the First Homes initiative. The City of Rochester's pledge of $250,000
not only makes possible the leveraging of additional funds at a ratio of 1:9, it also
stands an endorsement of the importance the City places on maintaining the economic
health of the area.
As discussed, your gift will assist in building 875 homes for working families in the
area. It is important to the success of the project that funds be received early. We
would respectively ask that the City's first year pledge payment of $50,000 be made
during the first quarter of 1999. Should you have any questions, please call the
Rochester Area Foundation office, at 282-0203.
Aeain. thank you for investing in the future of the area bv_ becoming a supporter
the First Homes project.
Sincerely,
Al DeBoer, Co -Chair
First Homes
Nedra Wicks, Co -Chair
First Homes
(507) 282.0203 • Fax (507) 2824938 0 E-mail — RAFMN@aol.com
2&r '
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
G. 1. RESOLUTIONS
MEETING
DATE: 3 , 6i?000
ORIGINATING DEPT: IT
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE G
G. 2. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES, as appropriate.
TERRY ADKINS
G. 3. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (for adoption).
,�aa) An Ordinance Amending the Provisions of Ordinance No. 3304 Which Provided for the
a Annexation to the City of Rochester of Approximately 10.84 Acres of Land Located in the Rose
Harbor Second, Third and Fourth Subdivision, Olmsted County, Minnesota.
b) An Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Sections 74.02 and 74.03 of the Rochester Code of
Ordinances, Relating to the Enforcement of the House Numbering System in the City of Rochester.
N P,
c) An Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Section 75.01 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances,
Relating to the Designation of Southern Woods Place Within Southern Woods First Subdivision as
Southern Wood Circle and the Designation of Southern Way Place Within Southern Woods Second
Subdivision as Southern Place.
t d) An Ordinance Annexing to the City of Rochester Approximately 10.93 Acres of Land Located in
C- a Part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 29, the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 30, and the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 107 North,
Range 13 West, Olmsted County, Minnesota. Said Property Located East of Century Hills Drive NE
��,.f('South of Viola Road Northeast.
'', e) An Ordinance Amending and Reenacting Sections 61.148, 62.707, and
Rochester Code of Ordinances Relating to Staff Authorized Changes to Issues
Development Agreement.
G.4. MISCELLANEOUS
COUNCIL ACTION: Mobonby: second
62.709 of the
Covered by a