Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/2001_RegularCITY OF ROCHESTER COUNCIL AGENDA O' , D1 COUNCILIBOARD CHAMBERS GOVERNMENT CENTER 151 4T" STREET SE MEETING NO. 9 MAY 7, 2001 REGULAR 7:00 P.M. PAGE (1-2) A) OPEN COMMENT PERIOD B) CALL TO ORDER C) LETTERS AND PETITIONS (3-4) (5-6) (7-10) • (11-12) (13-14) (15-16) (17-20) 0 (21-22) (23-24) (25-28) (29-30) (31-38) (39-42) (43-44) (45-46) (47-48) (49-50) (51-52) (53-54) 1) Pastor Phil Shaw Requests to be Heard 2) Petition for Reconstruction of 17-1/2 Street NW 3) Petition for Reconstruction of Seventh Avenue SE D) CONSENT AGENDAIORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS 1) Approval of Minutes 2) Request for Funding/Neighborhood Coordinating Council 3) Request for Internship Monies 4) Resolution in Opposition of Proposed NFPA 1710 (Minimum Manning and Staffing Standards) 5) Council Initiation of Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Relating to How Height is Measured 6) Change Order #9 with Alvin E. Benike, Inc. for Terminal Building Improvements 7) Annexation of Airport Property in High Forest Township 8) Professional Services Agreement for Storm Water Management Plan 9) Consideration of Public Utility Board Action 10) Licenses, Bonds & Miscellaneous Activities 11) Professional Boxing Franchise 12) Approval of Accounts Payable 13) Approving and Consenting to Olmsted County in Authorizing Sale of a Revenue Note for the Benefit of Southern Minnesota Center for Independent Living 14) Authorize Agreement for Armored Car Services 15) Donation of Mountain Bike 16) Donation to Honor Guard Council Agenda May 7, 2001 Page 2 (55-56) 17) Increase in Towing and Associates Services for Police Department Requested Towing (57-58) 18) Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan/Olmsted County Public Works Department (59-60) 19) Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan/Arcon Development, Summit Pointe II (61-62) 20) MnDOT/City Maintenance Agreement (63-64) 21) Development Agreement/Circle 19 Amendment #1 (65-66) 22) Development Agreement/Kingsbury Hills Amendment #1 (67-68) 23) Settlement Agreement for Right of Way Acquisition for 48th Street SW (69-70) 24) Pedestrian Facility Agreement/Goodin Company Property (71-72) 25) Pedestrian Facility Agreement/Rick Hexum, Jr. (1808 3`d Ave. SE) (73-74) 26) Pedestrian Facility Agreement/Gale Bisping Property (75-76) 27) Amend Owner Contract/Pine Ridge Estates Fourth Subdivision (77-78) 28) Owner Contract/Basic Construction in Greystone Second Sub. (79-80) 29) Owner Contract/Watermain & Hydrant to Serve the Sleep Inn Hotel/Airport Property (81-82) 30) Owner Contract/Basic Construction in Orchard Ridge 15t Sub/Phase 2 (83-84) 31) Owner Contract/Basic Construction to Serve Christ Our Rock Sub. (85-86) 32) Owner Contract/Watermain & Hydrants to Serve Lot 1, Block 1, Cascade Ridge Subdivision/Charter Communications (87-88) 33) Owner Contract/Basic Construction to Serve Circle 19 Plaza/Phase 2 (89-90) 34) Stormwater Management Agreements (91-92) 35) MnDOT and City of Rochester Agreement/Viola Road NE Bike Trail (93-96) 36) Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision (97-100) 37) Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Elmcroft Subdivision Area (101-104) 38) Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area (105-106) 39) Proposal for Design Engineering Services for Basic Construction to Serve Vacant Land in Sunnydale Subdivision (107-108) 40) Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Forest Hills Subdivision (109-110) 41) Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Elmcroft Subdivision (111-112) 42) Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Water Tower in Southeast Service Area (113-114) 43) Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Woodland Hills Subdivision (115-116) 44) Award Contract/Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 22nd St NE from 7th Ave to 10th Ave & 7v'-100 Aves NE from N Heights Drto 22nd St NE & 21st St Council Agenda May 7, 2001 Page 3 (117-118) 46) Award of Contract/Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 19' Avenue NW from 19�' Street NW to Valley High Drive (119-120) 46) Advertise for Bids/Traffic Calming on Fox Valley Drive from 23rd (121-122) 47) Avenue SW to Salem Road Advertise for Bids/Curb, Gutter & Overlay on I" Street SE from 13"' Avenue SE to 15'" Avenue SE (123-124) 48) Supplemental Agreement #1/East Frontage Road, Highway 52; Pennington Court to 55"' Street NW (125-126) 49) Supplemental Agreement #1/Mayo Run Environmental Corridor Pond Improvements (127-128) 50) Supplemental Agreement #1/Public Improvements Rase Harbor Sub. (129-130) 51) Advertise for Bids/2001 Restoration of Center Street Ramp (131-132) 52) Riverside Central School Zone Safety Study (133-134) 53) Parking Restriction Cassidy Drive NE (135-136) 54) Advertise for Bids for HVAC Air Handling Unit Replacement at W RP (137-138) 55) Advertise Bids for Process Control Computer Replacement at WRP E) HEARINGS (139-140) 1) Continued Hearing/Land Use Plan Amendment/Amend Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to Designate Approx. 46 Acres for "Commercial" Land Uses/North Side of 48'h Street SW, West of TH 63 and East of 11d' Avenue SW (141-142) 2) Continued Hearing/Zoning District Amendment by R.L. Hexum Associates to Rezone 36.32 Acres from R-1 to R-2 & 45.66 Acres from R-1 to M-1 3) Continued Hearing/General Development Plan/48d' Street GDP by (143-144) R.L. Hexum Associates (145-160) 4) Final Plat to be Known as Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side (161-168) 5) Final Plat to be Known as The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 (169-178) 6) Final Plat by Windsor Well Corporation to be Known as Greystone 2"d (179-190) 7) Land Use Plan Amendment by Willmar Investments to Amend Land Use Designation from "Low Density Residential" to "Medium Density Residential" on Approx. 1.47 Acres/North of Quarry Ridge Apartments, North of 2"d Street NW and West of TH 52 (191-196) 8) Zoning District Amendment by Willmar Investments to Amend Zoning District from R-1 to R-3 on Approx. 1.47 Acres (197-224) 9) General Development Plan for Lot 4, Block 1 of Hinderman Fitzgerald Subdivision (225-234) 10) Annexation by Ordinance Petition by Caryl Ripley to Annex Approx. 59.97 Acres West of 50'" Avenue NW, South of 65'" Street NW and North of the Douglas Trail Council Agenda May 7, 2001 Page 4 (235-242) 11) Public Hearing/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Thomas Subdivision Area (243-248) 12) Public Hearing/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Welch Subdivision Area (249-256) 13) Public Hearing/Sanitary Sewer and Public Improvements to Serve Rose Harbor Subdivision Area F) REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (257-258) G) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES H) TABLED ITEMS 1) OTHER BUSINESS J) ADJOURNMENT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1 DATE: 5/7/01 1 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. OPEN COMMENT PERIOD CITY ADMINISTRATOR A i t tm DESCRIPTION: OPEN COMMENT PERIOD PREPARED BY: S. KVENVOLD This agenda section is primarily for the purpose of allowing citizens to address the City Council on a topic of their choice. The following guidelines apply: • This section of the agenda may not be used as a forum to continue discussion on an agenda item which has already been held as a public hearing. • This agenda section is limited to 15 minutes and each speaker is limited to 4 minutes. • Any speakers not having the opportunity to be heard will be first to present at the next Council meeting. • Citizens may only use this forum to address the Council on a maximum of one time per month. • Matters currently under negotiation, litigation or related to personnel will not be discussed in this forum. • Questions posed by a speaker will generally be responded to in writing. vJUNCIL ACTION: motion by Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING / DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: LETTERS AND PETITIONS ORIGINATING DEPT: CITY ADMINISTRATOR ITEM NO. C � t _.A DESCRIPTION: PASTOR PHIL SHAW REQUESTS TO BE HEARD PREPARED BY: S.KVENVOLD Pastor Phil Shaw requests to be heard to invite the Mayor and City Council to a Tribute to Veterans ceremony. IUNCIL ACTION: Mouon by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: Letters and Petitions ORIGINATING DEPT: City Clerk ITEM NO/.� L' -p(,a DESCRIPTION: Petition for Reconstruction of 17 1/2 Street N.W. PREPARED BY. Judy Scherr A petition was received from the residents of 17 % Street N.W. requesting the City to reconstruct their street from 19th Avenue to 21" Avenue N.W. COUNCIL ACTION ACTION REQUESTED A motion to adopt the prepared resolution requesting reconstruction of 17 '/2 Street N.W. from 19th to 21st Avenue N.W. '`,�Vj^�V�6A r PA _ _ JNCIL ACTION: Motlon by: Second by: to: Page 4 of 4 April 10, 2001 PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF ROCHESTER We the undersigned owners of property in IR oc )i-ejiR in Olmsted County, Township, Minnesota, do hereby petition the Rochester City Council to construct the following local improvement project: 17 112 Street NW Commencing at —U °� 4 r/t and Ending at 1 Jl L' We are aware that as owners of property abutting this proposed local improvement project, we are subject to special assessment charges according to the City of Rochester's Comprehensive Pavement Management Program. Name rnleaee ndn11 Arlrlrees Signature REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: Letters and Petitions City Clerk EPREPARED DESCRIPTION: Petition for Reconstruction of Seventh Avenue S.E. : A petition has been received from the residents of Seventh Avenue S.E. requesting the Council to prepare a feasibility study for a Reconstruction Project of Seventh Avenue S.E. From 16d' to 16 '/2 S.E. Si-ewel COUNCIL ACTION REOUESTED A motion to adopt the repared resolution referring the petition for Reconstruction of Seventh Avenue S.E. From 16 to 16 % S.E. to the Public Works Department for feasibility study. # )UNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: g Page 4 of 4 January 29, 2001 PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF ROCHESTER We the undersigned owners of property in R Oc h FSterin Olmsted County, Township, Minnesota, do hereby petition the Rochester City Council to construct the following local improvement project: 7mA:2 . °SE tk Commencing at: 1 S i• S. E, and Ending at: Sf • S • E We are aware that as owners of property abutting this proposed local improvement project, we are subject to special assessment charges according to the City of Rochester's Comprehensive Pavement Management Program. Name/(please printsS) Address Signatu ✓ -( `"lVfrt. 4, I l &Y 7 >'f�C S (.� / •I6� ;1 C�• YMl" JE Pug r E' ! �3 7,4 c S. �. fJ-TAyip, AkLn ILSq Go Srvcqa✓r:t tlr 1.6rroM 16:27 7fA Ave S9 NJr c�ZGarltce Q, f`,!R i-h C�.� a I�i' /(0'i 1 .; 5 f r`:' r <.c �✓���+t( ��U":'/rl�i1 �; rri.f��!�. �, e. �j �,iia l'l: :i��. Page 4 of 4 January 29, 2001 111 PETITION FOR LOCAL"IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY OF ROCHESTER We the undersigned owners of property in A oJi. es fe-ti in Olmsted County, Township, Minnesota, do hereby petition the Rochester City Council to construct the following local improvement project: 7"' Ave SE Commencing at: r and Ending at We are aware that as owners of property abutting this proposed local improvement project, we are subject to special assessment charges according to the City of Rochester's Comprehensive Pavement Management Program. Name (please print) h ,_(r 4-f;u,0o a ILI Address Signature i Sit dj, I m 5C,('ce (yarv�y !7Af�v�-56 — �iw` �j� riY �l fYt C REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA CITY ADMINISTRATOR D-1-55 i i crvi DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS G. NEUMANN This RCA lists all the items which have been included in the consent agenda for this meeting. The Council can approve all of the items with a single motion to approve. The Council President will allow the Councilmembers an opportunity to state whether there are any of these items which you wish to have removed from the consent agenda approval and to have them discussed and acted upon separately by the Council. The consent agenda for this meeting consists of the following RCAs: D-1. Approval of Minutes D-2. Request for Funding/Neighborhood Coordinating Council D-3. Request for Internship Monies D-4. Resolution in Opposition of Proposed NFPA 1710 (Minimum Manning and Staffing Standards) D-5. Council Initiation of Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Relating to How Height is Measured D-6. Change Order #9 with Alvin E. Benike, Inc. for Terminal Building Improvements D-7. Annexation of Airport Property in High Forest Township D-8. Professional Services Agreement for Storm Water Management Plan D-9. Consideration of Public Utility Board Action D-10. Licenses, Bonds & Miscellaneous Activities D-11. Professional Boxing Franchise D-12. Approval of Accounts Payable D-13. Approving and Consenting to Ohnsted County in Authorizing Sale of a Revenue Note for the Benefit of Southern Minnesota Center for Independent Living D-14. Authorize Agreement for Armored Car Services D-15. Donation of Mountain Bike D-16. Donation to Honor Guard -D-17. Increase in Towing and Associates Services for Police Department Requested Towing D-18. Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan/Ohnsted County Public Works Department D-19. Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan/Arcon Development, Summit Pointe H D-20. MnDOT/City Maintenance Agreement D-21. Development Agreement/Circle 19 Amendment #1 D-22. Development Agreement/Kingsbury Hills Amendment #1 D-23. Settlement Agreement for Right of Way Acquisition for 48d' Street SW D-24. Pedestrian Facility Agreement/Goodin Company Property D-25. Pedestrian Facility AgreemenbRick Hexum, Jr. (1808 3`d Ave. SE) D-26. Pedestrian Facility Agreement/Gale Bisping Property D-27. Amend Owner Contract/Pine Ridge Estates Fourth Subdivision D-28. Owner Contract/Basic Construction in Greystone Second Sub. D-29. Owner Contract/Watermain & Hydrant to Serve the Sleep Inn Hotel/Airport Property D-30. Owner Contract/Basic Construction in Orchard Ridge 15S Sub/Phase 2 wUNCILACTION: Modonby: Second by: to: ld� Request for Council Action Approval of Consent Agenda Items May 7, 2001 Page 2 D-31. Owner Contract/Basic Construction to Serve Christ Our Rock Sub. D-32. Owner Contract/Watermain & Hydrants to Serve Lot 1, Block 1, Cascade Ridge Subdivision/Charter Communications D-33. Owner Contract/Basic Construction to Serve Circle 19 Plaza/Phase 2 D-34. Stormwater Management Agreements D-35. MnDOT and City of Rochester Agreement/Viola Road NE Bike Trail �D-36. Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision D-37. Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Ehncroft Subdivision Area D-38. Consideration of Bids/Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area D-39. Proposal for Design Engineering Services for Basic Construction to Serve Vacant Land in Sunnydale Subdivision D-40. Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Forest Hills Subdivision D-41. Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Elmcroft Subdivision D-42. Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Water Tower in Southeast Service Area D-43. Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Woodland Hills Subdivision nd h th th th D-44. Award Contract/Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 22 St NE from 7 Ave to 10 Ave & 7 10 Aves NE from N Heights Dr to 22nd St NE & 2151 St D-45. Award of Contract/Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 19d' Avenue NW from 19t° Street NW to Valley High Drive D-46. Advertise for Bids/Traffic Calming on Fox Valley Drive from 23 d Avenue SW to Salem Road D-47. Advertise for Bids/Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 151 Street SE from 13th Avenue SE to 15th Avenue SE D-48. Supplemental Agreement #l/East Frontage Road, Highway 52; Pennington Court to 55th Street NW D-49. Supplemental Agreement #1/Mayo Run Environmental Corridor Pond Improvements D-50. Supplemental Agreement #l/Public Improvements Rose Harbor Sub. D-51. Advertise for Bids/2001 Restoration of Center Street Ramp D-52. Riverside Central School Zone Safety Study D-53. Parking Restriction Cassidy Drive NE D-54. Advertise for Bids for HVAC Air Handling Unit Replacement at WRP D-55. Advertise Bids for Process Control Computer Replacement at AW COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve consent agenda items. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING � P DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA CITY ADMINISTRATOR D , o2 ITEM DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR FUNDING/NEIGHBORHOOD COORDINATING PREPARED BY: COUNCIL S. KVENVOLD A couple of years ago, the Rochester Neighborhood Association published a booklet which summarizes many of the City ordinances which are of particular interest to citizens involved in their neighborhoods. This booklet has been very well received and the supply has been used up. The Neighborhood Coordinating Council is requesting $4,063 from the City of Rochester to print an additional 7,500 copies of this booklet. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Request a motion appropriating $4,063 from the 2001 Contingency Account to the Neighborhood Coordinating Council to print additional copies of City Ordinance Highlights Toward Neighborhood Awareness. NOTE TO COUNCIL: I will be placing this item on the 5/7/O1 Council meeting. Please let me know if you want some discussion of this item prior to the Council meeting.Ilk 11 yn� MVC(n^� N � c.dUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: 6 al f REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING rs ' DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDASECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA CITY ADMINISTRATOR D 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR INTERNSHIP MONIES PREPARED L S. KVENVOLD I request an appropriation of $2,000 from the 2001 Contingency Account to host an intern in the Administrator's Office for the summer of 2001. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Request a motion appropriating $2,000 from the 2001 Contingency Account to the Administrator's Office budget for the purpose of funding an internship during the summer of 2001. WUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING r? - DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA City Administration b - ITEM DESCRIPTION Resolution in opposition of proposed NFPA 1710 (Minimum Manning and PREPARED BY: Staffing Standards) T. Spaeth At the April 23, 2001 Committee of the Whole meeting, the Council discussed the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 1710) standards related to minimum manning of fire vehicles and response times, which if adopted and complied with, would greatly increase the expenses associated with the Rochester Fire Department. The Council consensus is that fire department standards should be a local decision and expressed opposition to proposed NFPA 1710. A number of other organizations such as NLC, LMC, and ICMA are opposed to the proposed standards, and are requesting communities to adopt a resolution in opposition to NFPA. The resolution will be forwarded to these organizations to be submitted as part of the record at the May 16, 2001 NFPA Technical Committee meeting in Anaheim, California. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the prepared resolution in opposition of proposed NFPA 1710 is go UNCIL ACTION: M.U.n by: Second by: to: Resolution OPPOSITION TO MINIMUM MANNING AND STAFFING STANDARDS (NFPA 1710) WHEREAS, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) is an international association of individuals and trade and professional organizations; and WHEREAS, NFPA's mission is "to reduce the worldwide burden of fire and other hazards on the quality of life by providing and advocating scientifically -based consensus codes and standards, research, and education;" and WHEREAS, NFPA has produced over 275 codes and standards that deal with every aspect of fire and life safety; and WHEREAS, NFPA is an internationally recognized authority in producing codes and standards dealing with fire and life safety; and WHEREAS, NFPA is currently proposing a new standard, NFPA 1710, Organizational and deployment of fire suppression operation, emergency medical services, and special operations to the public by career fire departments; and WHEREAS, standard 1710 defines minimum response times, minimum fire comp staffing levels, initial full alarm response levels, and extra alarm response levels; and WHEREAS, levels of service delivery for fire and emergency medical services (EMS) have always been determined by local jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the proposed NFPA 1710 would impose onerous, unfounded mandates upon local governments to meet established response times, and staffing levels, if adopted by NFPA and further consideration is taken by federal agencies, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and insurance companies; and WHEREAS, the NFPA has clearly gone outside its authority in proposing these national minimum manning, response, and staffing standards; and WHEREAS, NFPA codes and standards are voluntary and need to be adopted by local jurisdictions, these standards will be held to be the norm because of the stature of the NFPA in other codes and standards; and WHEREAS, NFPA 1710 will be voted on at the NFPA annual conference in May of 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City of Rochester, Minnesota opposes P-1 attempt by the National Fire Protection Association to adopt standards for staffing or minim manning levels of fire, specialized or emergency medical services vehicles controlled by units of local government; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City of Rochester, Minnesota opposes any attempt by the National Fire Protection Association to adopt a standard dictating or affecting the response times of any fire, specialized or emergency medical services vehicle. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, THIS DAY OF 2001 PRESIDENT OF SAID COMMON COUNCIL ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED THIS DAY OF MAYOR OF SAID CITY (Seal of the City of Rochester, Minnesota) 0^s20004Res01u0pp0se. nfpe 2001. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING -� DATE: 5nlol AGENDASECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA City Administration .b _ 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION Council initiation of text amendment to zoning ordinance relating to how PREPARED BY: height is measured T. Spaeth Recently there have been some complaints regarding the construction of a garage within the City of Rochester. The particular garage meets the allowable height requirements for an accessory structure requirements of the zoning ordinance. This type of complaint has arose in the past also. The problem has typically been that the height of accessory buildings are measured along the building front. There are instances where the structure meets the height requirement at the building front (15 feet), but due to the topography of the lot, it maybe greater than 15 feet in height along the sides or rear of the building. Based upon the concerns of how height is presently measured, the staff would suggest that the Council initiate an amendment to the text of the zoning ordinance regarding the definition of height that would take into account the height of all sides of a building. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: The Council initiate an amendment to the text of the zoning ordinance regarding the definition of height that would take account the height of all sides of a building. COUNCILACTION: Motonby: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING R DATE: 5/7/01 Consent ITEM DESCRIPTION: C improvements. Order #9 ORIGINATING DEPT: Rochester International Airport for The Rochester Airport Commission recommends and requests Council authorization to: Steven W. Legve Execute Change Order #9 with Alvin E. Benike Inc. for Ternvnal Building improvements. (J6942) This change order involves additional work to install heat trace in six roof drains on the canopy. These drains froze this winter and caused some damage to the roof drain system. This change order will result in a cost of $21,019.00 A copy of the change order is attached. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Resolution authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Change Order #9 documents. )UNCILACTION: Mofionby: second REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING R � DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: Consent ORIGINATING DEPT: Rochester International Airport ITEM NO. D . 07 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Annexation of Airport Property in High Forest Township. PREPARED BY: Steven W. Legve The Rochester Airport Commission recommends and requests Council authorization to: 1. Initiate annexation of the Billings, Carr, Menshik and Monson properties acquired by the Airport to the City of Rochester by ordinance. 2. Initiate a zoning change of the property to be annexed from agricultural to M-1, Mixed Commercial Industrial to be consistent with current airport property. Attached are copies of the exhibit and legal discription for the properties that are included in the petition for annexation. All of the properties are located in the High Forest Township, Olmsted County, Minnesota. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Resolution authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to initiate the annexation and zone change. b WuNCILACTION: Motionby: Secondby: to: o� Rochester International Airport ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, USA Helgerson Drive Southwest • Rochester, MN 55902 April 2, 2001 Honorable Mayor and Common Council City of Rochester, Minnesota c/o Judy Scherr, City Clerk City Hall 201 SE 4' St.-Rm. 135 Rochester, Minnesota 55904 RE: Annexation of Airport Property in High Forest Township Dear Mayor and Council: On behalf of the Airport Commission of the Rochester International Airport and the Rochester Airport Company, I am petitioning the Council to initiate annexation of the Billings, Carr, Menshik and Monson properties acquired by the Airport to the City of Rochester by ordinance. Attached are copies of the exhibit and legal descriptions for the properties that are included in the petition for annexation. All of the properties are located in the High Forest Township, Olmsted County, Minnesota. Should you have any questions or desire additional information, please contact me. Respectfully, � Apqn Steven W. Legve Airport Manager pc Mr. Chuck Canfield, Chair Airport Commission Mr. James Orke, Chair Joint Airport Zoning Board Mr. Stevan Kvenvold, City Administrator Mr. Terry Adkins, City Attorney Mr. Michael Nigbur, Public Works Mr. Ron Livingston, Olmsted County Zoning Administrator Mr. John Harford, Olmsted County Planning Mr. David L. Morrill, McGhie & Betts, Inc. ROCHESTER - OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE SE, SUITE 100, ROCHESTER, MN, 55904-4744 PH: (507) 285-8232 FAX: (507) 287-2275 To: Steve Kvenvold, City Administrator From: Phil Wheeler, AICP, Planning Director Date: May 7, 2001 Re: Agenda Item D-7 — Annexation and Zoning of Airport Property Agenda Item D-7 asks the Council to initiate an annexation and rezoning for land acquired for airport purposes south of the existing property. The area to be annexed will be within the City limits but beyond the urban service area. The contemplated uses of the area to be annexed include surface spreading and composting of street sweepings, surface spreading of dredged materials, the use of sludge as a soil enhancement, and raising of crops. All of these uses are compatible with the Land Development Manual AG zoning district. Since the AG zoning district accommodates the proposed use and is consistent with the County Land Use Plan (which has designated the subject area as `resource protection', we recommend that the Council intiate a rezoning to the AG district rather than the M-1 district. I have discussed this matter with Steve Leqve and he has no objection to making the change in this request. IN a' 7 Rochester PROPOSED ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION Minnesota For: ACSG, INC. Date: April 2, 2001 Land Surveying Urban - Land Planning (Monson Purchase) Consulting - Civil Engineering The East 436 feet of the North 797 feet of the Southwest Quarter (SW'/4) of Section 16, Township 105, Range 14, in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Geotechnical Engineering ALSO: Construction Material Testing (Menshik Purchase) Landscape Architecture That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 105 North, Range 14 West, Olmsted County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 16; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 52 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Southwest Quarter, 1317.77 feet to the southwest comer of the Southeast Quarter of said Southwest Quarter; thence North 25 degrees 46 minutes 28 seconds East, 2036.12 feet to the southwest corner of the East 4.36 feet of the North 797 feet of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 21 seconds East, along the south line of said North 797 feet, a distance of 436.00 feet to the east line of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 46 seconds West, along said east line, 1831.25 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO: (Carr Purchase) The East t/e of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 105 North, Range 14 West, Olmsted County, Minnesota. ALSO: (illings Purchase) The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 105 North, Range 14 West. 1648 Third Avenue S.E. Rochester, MN 55904 Containing in all, 165 acres, more or less. Tel. 507.289.3919 Fax. 507.289.7333 e-mail. mcghiebetts.com Established 1946 a� ANNEXATION EXH N DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED: SCALE 1° = 1000' to n SE CfIMER - St 1/4 SEC 18 FOR : ACSG, INC. 800 WEST 5TH AVENUE SUITE 102A NAPERVILLE, IL 60563 1/4 S 1/4 SFG 11-103-14 E1fI511NG MY MS � 1 4 SM 11 - — — --- I T.H. N0. 30 McGhie cm.otNq Engl.... 1848 3rd AVE. S.E. HESTER ICIPAL 'ORT PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA 165 ACRES solve 1 " = 1000 Betts,tnc. c�Te: 4/2/01 Land Surveyors �nery AOOc No.: 4096/9664C MN. 55904 507-2B9-3919 CADD No.: 9564ANEX REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 491 DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Rochester International Airport p. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Professional Services Agreement for a Storm Water Management Plan. PREPARED BY: Steven W. Legve The Rochester Airport Commission recommends and requests Council authorization to: Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with McGhie & Betts, Inc. for a Storm Water Management Plan. (J6968) Project Cost: $31,100.00 This project is in the current CIP. Project Funding: 60% State 40% Local COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: volution authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the professional services agreement. . JUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: Zr r L Meeting REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date 5/7/01 ENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPT: IROCHESTER ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC UTILITIES ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: Consideration of Public Utility Board Action Kathy Wilson The Rochester Public Utility Board has approved the following on April 24, 2001 and requests the Common Council's favorable consideration: to approve a resolution to approve a purchase order agreement with DUECO, Inc. for one aerial device and fiberglass body and installation. The amount of the purchase order agreement to be $48,222.00 plus sales tax and DUECO, Inc. being lowest responsible bidder. to approve a resolution to approve a contract agreement with Knutson Construction Services, Inc., and that the Common Council authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreement for Cascade Creek Unit 2 — Contract 3 Fuel Oil Unloading & Gas Turbine Utilities. The amount of the contract agreement to be $3,286,000.00 and Knutson Construction Services, Inc. being lowest responsible bidder. to approve a resolution to approve a purchase order agreement with Tri-State Drilling, Inc. for installation of two drilled pier foundations. The amount of the purchase order agreement to be $46,637.00 and Tri-State Drilling, Inc. being lowest responsible bidder. - to approve a resolution to approve a purchase order agreement with SAP Public Services, Inc. for software maintenance and support for 2001. The amount of the purchase order agreement to be $72,797.23. - to approve a resolution to approve a purchase order agreement with Osmose Inc. for pole testing and treatment services. The amount of the purchase order agreement not to exceed $40,000.00 and Osmose Inc. being sole source. GENERAL MANAGER: v�C 6 Lu Io5/ e OUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: Agenda Item# 4, a. Meeting Date: 4/24/01 SUBJECT: Purchase of 1 Terex-Telelect Hi -Ranger HR40-M aerial device, 1 Fibre Body FB84-DLP fiberglass body and installation PREPARED BY: Bill Cook, Supervisor, Environmental, GIS & Fleet ITEM DESCRIPTION: Plans for vehicle replacement in 2001 include a new truck with aerial device for the Electric Maintenance & Construction service run crew. The 2001 capital improvement budget included $100,000 for this unit. This unit replaces an existing unit. Quotes were received from three vendors to supply the aerial device, body and installation on an RPU provided cab & chassis. Based on our evaluation of the quotes which included quoted price, delivery, previous experience with manufacturer and bidder, availability of service and repair facilities, compliance with specifications and operating & maintenance costs, it was determined that the Altec Industries quotation failed to meet minimum specifications and that this represents material deviations that will affect the ability of the unit to perform its designated function. Therefore, DUECO INC. was determined to be the lowest responsive quotf with a price of $48,222. UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: Management recommends that the Board reject the Altec Industries quotation for failure to meet minimum specifications, and request City Council approval of a Purchase Order to: DUECO INC., 1901 14th Ave. NW, Watertown SD 57201 in the amount of $48,222 plus sales tax as lowest responsive quote. F�ev�ewed +19-0, t VJ 6- G ral Manager Date PUBLIC FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item# 4.b. Meeting Date: 4/24/01 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Cascade Creek Unit 2 - Contract 3 Fuel Oil Unloading & Gas Turbine Utilities Wally Schlink, Manager of Power Production Cascade Creek Unit 2 is the new gas turbine installation project at the Cascade Creek substation. The project as a whole has received approval from both the Utility Board and the City Council. We are in the process of bidding and requesting approval for the individual contracts that will make up the entirety of the project. This is Contract 3 of the Cascade Creek Unit 2 Gas Turbine Project The project is set up in a multiple contract format with Burns & McDonnell providing architectural and engineering services and RPU being the project manager. The scope of Contract 3 is to perform the following work at the Cascade Creek site: • Foundations for the Pratt & Whitney gas turbine and all accessories • Pilings for equipment and foundation • Roadwork • Site grading • Underground piping and electrical duct bank • Piping and electrical conduit trenching • Foundations for pre-engineered building • Furnish & installation of pre-engineered buildings • Demineralized water storage tank foundation • Furnish, install and place into operation fuel unloading system • Miscellaneous work as specified or directed The scope of Contract 3 was developed to meet gas turbine installation needs and to meet federal and state environmental regulatory requirements for fuel unloading and transport. This is the largest contract of the project in both scope and cost with the exception of the purchase of the gas turbine generating unit itself. We expect two (2) additional contracts and two (2) equipment purchases to complete the project. Bums and McDonnell developed the construction specification and drawing package that was then distributed to potential bidders and advertised as required. A pre -bid meeting was held where the site was made available and questions and clarifications were discussed. A memorandum of the pre -bid meeting notes and an addendum were issued. Bids were received and opened on April 13, 2001 and L/ Ge66al Manager ate FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item # Meeting Date: four (4) companies responded to the bid request and submitted proposals. Bids were evaluated based on the criteria set forth in the bid documents. The recommendation to award from Bums & McDonnell, a matrix comparing proposals and a copy of the low bidder's submission is attached. Burns & McDonnell recommended award of the bid to the low bidder, Knutson Construction Services Inc.,. RPU staff concurs with this recommendation. Staff and the Bums & McDonnell project manager will be at the Utilities Board meeting to make a presentation on the project and to answer questions. UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution requesting the Common Council to approve a contract agreement with Knutson Construction Services Inc. to provide the services and materials as defined in the bid specification for a contract price of three million two hundred eighty six thousand dollars ($3,286,000.00). Re\3u--V ed 14-19-01 L4n'1 - General Manager Date FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item # 4 • c • Meeting Date: 4/ 24/01 T SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF QUOTES DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS —TRANSMISSION POLES, LINES RQ7 & Q4 PREPARED BY: Neil Stiller Sr. Electrical Engineer ITEM DESCRIPTION: As part of the 161kV conversion project of Cascade Creek Substation, two steel transmission poles must be installed on drilled pier concrete foundations. These cylindrical foundations require specialized equipment and expertise to construct. Quotes were sought from three qualified contractors, two replied. Their quotes were: Tri-State Drilling $46,637.00 Layne of Minnesota $78,257.00 Atlas Foundations No Bid UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: It is recommended that the Utility Board request Council approval of a purchase order agreement with Tri- State Drilling, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $46,637 for installation of two drilled pier foundations. Rewewca 4-�S-w w"f__ /'�X Y / 7167 Gen4al Manager ate FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item# 5 Meeting Date: 4/24/01 SUBJECT: Annual Maintenance on Business Software PREPARED BY. Jim Daley, Manager - Information Services ITEM DESCRIPTION: We use enterprise business software from SAP Public Services Inc. for tracking capital and maintenance projects, materials management, asset management, regulatory reporting and financial/management reporting. Annual software maintenance agreements are a critical component of all major software implementations. They provide us with up-to-date access to information on software problems, updates to fix software that does not work correctly and new functionality that is developed as the software is enhanced. Annual software maintenance is typically priced at 15 —18% of the total current retail price of a software license. The annual maintenance agreement for our SAP enterprise business software for 2001 is $72,797.23. This is 17% of the current retail purchase price of $428,219.00. This item was budgeted at $90,000.00. UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution requesting the Common Council to approve a purchase order agreement with SAP Public Services Inc. for $72,797.23 for software maintenance and support services on our enterprise business software for 2001. /. A �' Z -/8 O Ge ral Manager Date Agenda Item # FOR BOARD ACTION Meeting Date: 4/24/01 SUBJECT: Osmose Pole Inspection Services PREPARED BY: Mark Kotschevar — Manager of Maintenance and Construction ITEM DESCRIPTION: RPU has an annual pole inspection program that has been in place for more than 20 years. This program includes the inspection and groundline treatment of approximately 1200 poles per year, or a 10-year cycle. This program serves two purposes: 1) It is a National Electrical Safety Code requirement that our overhead system, including poles, be inspected on a routine basis. This inspection determines which poles are no longer suitable for service and need to be reinforced or replaced. 2) The use of groundline treatment extends the life of the pole 10 years and delays the need for pole replacements. RPU has used Osmose, a nationally recognized company for this service, exclusively over the years and has had good results. The average cost per distribution pole is approximately $27.00 while the average replacement cost can be in the $400.00 to $500.00 range. In addition to the distribution poles, RPU is in the second year of an inspection program for the transmission poles. The average cost to inspect and treat these poles is approximately $38.00 due to the increased size of these class poles. The replacement of a typical transmission pole can run in excess of $6,000.00. The use of this service has a substantial payback in terms of pole life extension. This year's plan is to inspect approximately 1200 distribution poles and 200 transmission poles. Based on the attached price schedule this would be approximately $40,000. Staff will be available at the meeting to answer any questions. UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: It is requested that the Board approve a resolution requesting the Common Council to approve purchase order agreement with Osmose Inc. in an amount not to exceed $40,000.00 for pole testing and treatment services. zv�ewed q-teh-3k wVW- Ge ral Manager ate REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 39 DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: CITY CLERK ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION: LICENSES, BONDS & MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES PREPARED BY: DONNA]SCHOTT The following licenses, bonds and miscellaneous activities are submitted for the Council's approvals or disapprovals. All are pending departmental approvals, the required insurance, bonds, fees and all outstanding debts with the City of Rochester. BEER — OFF SALE 3.2 NEW APPLICATION RSI - Supervalu, Inc DBA Cub Foods 1021 15°i Ave SE Rochester, Mn 55904 CIRCUS Rochester Junior Chamber of Commerce 415 3" Ave SE Rochester, Mn 55904 George Arden Circus at Mayo Civic Center 5/1/01 30 Civic Center Dr SE Rochester, Mn 55904 PRIOR APPROVALS GIVEN BY: D HANSON, M EVANS, J MCCONNELL, J HUNZIKER GAMBLING — TEMPORARY Ronald McDonald House 850 2n" St SW Rochester, Mn 55902 Raffle 7/27/01 AT Willow Creek Golf Course 1700 48" St SW Rochester, Mn 55902 OUTDOOR DINING - RENEWAL Victoria's Authentic Italian Restaurant 21-2"oStSW Rochester, Mn 55902 t,.uUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: LICENSES, BONDS AND MISCELLANEOUS CITY ACTIVITIES l _ PAGE 2 MAY 7, 2001 Daube's Bakery 14 Historic 3`d St SW Rochester, Mn 55902 O'NeilI's Pizza Pub 7-2 nd St SW Rochester, Mn 55902 SEWER AND DRAINS Bomgaars Enterprises, Inc. 1530 Greenview Dr SW #105 Rochester, Mn 55902 SIDEWALKS — CEMENT Wick's Construction, Inc. PO Box 428 Decorah, Iowa 52101 Wilson Construction 322 Highland Ave Owatonna, Mn 55060 SOUND AMPLIFICATION Century High School 2525 Viola Rd NE Rochester, Mn. 55906 Target Leadership Group Music for Outdoor Dance 5111101 8:00 PM to 11:00 PM (PLEASE WAIVE 8:00 TIME PERIOD) SEE ATTACHED MISCELLANEOUS Veteran's Memorial Association Memorial Day Parade & Service 5/28/01 Central Park to Soldier's Field Memorial Park 9:15 AM to 10:30 AM Rochester, Mn 55902 Rochester Area Habitat for Humanity Bicycle Tour 6/16/01 To Subsidize RAHH Housing Projects A.B.A.T.E. 14`h Annual Toys for Tots Motorcycle Run 7/14/01 From Harley Davis Shop to Clements Chevrolet Rochester, Mn,55902 LICENSES, BONDS AND MISCELLANEOUS CITY ACTIVITIES PAGE 2 MAY 7, 2001 Rochester Track Club Rochester Women's Race 7/21/01 Silver Lake Park Rochester, Mn 55904 Law Enforcement Torch Run for Special Olympics 5/16/01 Government Center to Hwy 14 West Rochester Mn 55904 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED A motion to approve or disapprove the above licenses and miscellaneous city activities. A-30-2001 3:52AH FROH CENTUR'r H1UH a:.NUUL bUl can 0o= 4OP- Century High School 2525 Viola Rd N E Rochester, MN. 55906 TO: Judy Scherr City Clerk Rochester, MN. FAX.: 285-8256 FR. Ray Barnett Century H S Leadership adviser RE: Permit for outdoor amplified music Judy, The Target Leadership group at Century high school would like a permit for an outside dance, which will have amplified music on the Century campus. The dance will be held on May 11 from 8pm until 11 pm. The reason for the dance is to promote drug free activities for Century students. Food, prizes, soda and music will be provided for the students. We project 300 students at the dance. The music/ amplifiers will be directed at the high school stadium. The band will be next to the building and will face east. It will not be directed south or north toward the housing developments. The stadium will help block some of the sound toward the east. This is a new activity we hope to continue annually. It is in conjunction with our adopt a highway activity and we want it to be a student oriented activity. Sincerely, Ray Barnett, Adviser 74,:Z- x .2 8 5 F Y'7—r REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/Ol AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Agenda City Clerk D" ( i i mW DESCRIPTION: Professional Boxing Franchise PREPARED BY: Judy Scherr The Rochester BPO Elks Lodge No. 1091, Inc. is requesting approval of their request to hold the Professional Boxing Franchise for the City of Rochester. Tuffy's Boxing Promotions, Inc, has held the Professional Franchise since June 1995. They have not requested renew of the license for the current year. The Elks Lodge has requested that the Franchise be issued for the period ending Decembr 31, 2002. The Elks Lodge has not been involved in boxing promotions in the past. We also have the possibility that Tuffy's will want to sponsor a card during the latter part of the year. The Boxing Conunission only awards the franchise for a 13-week period. However, I would recommend that the franchise period end on August 31, 2001. The State Boxing Commission has already approved the Franchise for the Elks Lodge contingent upon local City approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED A motion to adopt the prepared resolution to consent to the holding of boxing or sparring exhibitions sponsored by the Rochester BPO Elks Lodge No. 1091 for the period ending August 31, 2001. ., UNCIL ACTION: Moron by: Second by: to: MPR.-04''011WEW IS 21 BRCCE WHITE CONNN TEL SU 1 8211'+ P 001 ROCHESTER BY.O. ELKS LODGE NO. 1091, INC. - - Meetings • - r $07 / 282.6702 Second and Fourth Wednesday ' 917 - a SIh Avenue S.C. -a ROGiFSTER, MIN14FSOTA 55904 ti Office of Secretary att a ` Z o y` P • April i. 2001 Juds Schcri City Clerks 01 rice 201 Sr.' 4th St Iis City Mall ROCIleSltr. WIN 55904 Dent Ms. Scher: We orc requesting perroc mission tiom the City oRheacr to allow rite Elks Club or Rochester to protonic profetsianal buxinp in Rochester through December., 1. 202. The Elks will be working in close conjunction wi(h the 4111 St Gym of Rochester in promoting these evnds. Tom Leonard. past president of the 4111 SIG ym and eunem board member. was a p6n6linl 'nt l'urr.3 while they hell the rranchise to promote proressional boxim, in Itoch.�ter. 911c 4th St Gym has been itwolvcd in the previous promuuoms u1'prnressinnal hexing. In addition they promoted i - 4 boxing show: per )car. Several of which were sponsored by the Elks. including State and mgioml tournaments. Current board n lembeis'include Chock Lunde. pfr%idenr: Pat Caltelle vice ptrsidenc Dan O'Connor. trcaaurcr. Jim Davis and Tom Lcunard Our firit cvcm is a 3ehedulLd pro -Ant evcnl In IV held Iunc 23.0in comjunethas with Rochcster&a 'this will be the kick-otT orlhe.lh SI t.iym s rculmrohtp will Y.A.L. (l'ohee Athletic The Mtut 1, scheduled to be held ou(doorrs on the Lli,'s premises and will be'I I'undroiier for the 40t S( Gym youth bnxin; pro;mm. We would like to hnvc it least one annual I`ro-Am v-s'ent per year a, well as continuin, with our amaicur botint shows Thank you ror your help in this mwici. hcslxclrul ly, Timothy Ryon Rmliecrer 6ks Lodge 41091 ,-t uciaonuzsuo-i uouuon,0 dE0r50 To 21 odd REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING T� DATE: 5/7101 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPT: Finance Department ITEM NO. b - (aEIBY ITEM DESCRIPTION: of Accounts Payable PREPAREApproval Dale Ma Respectfully request a motion to approve payment of Accounts Payable (submitted separately) in the amount of $3,389,640,05. Less: Any exceptions COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING - DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Finance D_ f3 ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: Approving and Consenting to Olmsted County in Authorizing the Sale D. Martinson of a Revenue Note for the Benefit of Southern Minnesota Center for Independent Living Olmsted County has been asked to issue conduit revenue bonds on behalf of a 501(C)(3) nonprofit agency for a project located in the City of Rochester. The proposed borrower is the Southern Minnesota Center for Independent Living, Inc. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.153, Subdivision 3 requires that the City approve of the County issuing such bonds if the monies are to be used for a project located within the City's boundaries. Monies from the bond issue would be used for the acquisition and remodeling by the corporation of an existing building located at 2720 North Broadway for use as a training center and office space. The City does not participate in the issuance of these bonds, and is making no recommendation to the County to issue the bonds. The City would have no obligation whatsoever with respect to the bonds or the project. The City's bond counsel has reviewed the proposed resolution consenting to the issuance and has made minor amendments to further protect the City. City staff recommends approval of the proposed financing. Council Action Requested Adoption of the prepared resolution approving and consenting to the financing of the project for Southern Minnesota Center for Independent Living, Inc. JUNCIL ACTION: Motion by Second by to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1 / ' DATE: 05/07/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Agenda / Organizational Business Finance Department v-14 tm DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: Authorize Agreement for Armored Car Services Dale Martinson We are requesting authorization to execute a renewal of the service agreement between Rochester Armored Car Co, Inc. and the City of Rochester. Services to be provided include daily pick up and delivery of cash and check deposits from various City locations. We started using this service a little over a year ago when we switched banking service providers to Wells Fargo. We desired to limit the risks — both to the safety of our employees and the security of our deposits - associated with having our employees deliver multiple deposits to the bank each day on foot. The arrangement with Rochester Armored Car has worked out well for us since making this change. Rochester Armored Car has been in this business for many years and is the only entity that truly provides the level of service needed. The company insures our deposits for $1.0 million for normal daily activity. We obtain special insurance riders for the occasional special tax and aid payments. Evidence of this coverage for the coming year has already been provided. The firm has quoted us the same $231 monthly fee for this service in the coming year as was quoted last year. I felt this was quite a reasonable charge for those services last year, and am glad they could continue offer this at the same price. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Authorized Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreements with Rochester Armored Car Company, Inc. for the pickup of daily banking deposits. — jUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 57i ' DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDASECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Agenda Police D_1 5 cm DESCRIPTION: Donation of Mountain Bike PREPARED BY: Roger Peterson Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC supports community policing efforts and would like to donate a precision - engineered all -terrain mountain bike to police departments that are actively involved with community policing using a bike patrol. The Police -Duty version of Mercedes-Benz "civilian" All -Terrain Mountain Bike has an approximate retail value of $2,000. The bike has a specific rear sub -frame with a welded rack pack, special surface finishes, fitted with an all -aluminum frame, full suspension featuring a hydraulic rear shock absorber, front and rear cable - actuated disc brakes and a drivetrain with 24-speed gearing. There are no shipping costs. Assembly and addition of patrol equipment is required of our department. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve acceptance of a mountain bike from Mercedes-Benz for use in the Police Department's bike patrol. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/01 Consent Agenda ITEM DESCRIPTION: DONATION TO HONOR GUARD Police DEPT: VAO PREPARED BY'. Roger Peterson Connelly's Surplus would like to donate $200 to the Rochester Police Honor Guard. This money is to be used for training expenses. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve acceptance of $200 from Connelly's Surplus to be used for Police Honor Guard training expenses. Appropriate $100 to 4110-12110 Appropriate $100 to 4110-12140 �JUNCIL ACTION: Moeon by: second 11 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 5G7 DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA Police G DEPT: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Increase in Towing and Associated Services for Police Department Requested Towing D-I'? PREPARED BY: Roger Peterson The towing companies servicing the Rochester Police Department are requesting an increase in the present towing and associated service rates which were approved in May of 1998. I support the following rate increase requests: Impound Tow Add $10 fee between 22:00 and 06:00 City Squad Tow Required Flatbed Tow (includes impound tow) Winching (minimum) Dollies Service Call (jump starts, fire changes, unlock vehicles, deliver fuel) Disposal of Unclaimed Vehicles Standby Time for Investigations Storage Outisde Per Day Storage Inside Per Day COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Current Increase $55.00 $65.00 45.00 55.00 20.00 85.00 20.00 20.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 40.00 -0- 35.00 -0- 50.00 hr 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 Approval of tow and service rate increasefortowing companies servicing the Rochester Police Departme t e. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING q#� DATE: 05/7/01 AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ING DEPT: ITEM NO. PLANNING D 4 8 Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan —Olmsted County Public Works Department April 30, 2001 Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan: John Harford, BY; Olmsted County will be constructing a realigned CR 8 and bridge across the Zumbro River immediately south of West Circle Drive. There is 0.26 acres of Type 1 wetlands along the river edge on both banks of the river within the construction project. The bridge will span the wetland, however, the support pilings will cause a filling of some of the wetland. Also a portion of the reconstructed bike trail on the south side of the river will cause a filling of the edge of a separate wetland. The total filling is 0.07 acres or about 3,050 square feet. The wetland replacement will be through the Board of Water and Soil Resources road replacement program. The total replacement will be 0.14 acres or about 6,100 square feet. The Technical Evaluation Panel met and reviewed this application in early April and recommended approval. Other referral agencies have not made any comments. The TEP recommended use of best management practices to avoid impacts on the wetland not being filled. ining Staff Recommendation:. 1. The staff recommends approval of this replacement plan. City Council Action: 1. The council should pass a resolution approving the replacement plan Attachments: 1. Report from the applicant. Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Attomey 3. City Administrator's Office 4. Planning Department File COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 4 / / DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: I ORIGINATING DEPT: CONSENT AGENDA PLANNING ITEM DESCRIPTION: Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan — Arcon Development, Summit Pointe 11 April 30, 2001 Wetland Delineation and Replacement Plan: ITEM NO. D -rq John Hadord, BY: The applicant has proposed the filling of 1.18 acres or 51,400 square feet of Type 1 wetland on property located on property owned by Arcon. The property is located immediately north of White Oaks subdivision, east of 50`I' Ave., NW and south of 65'h St., NW. The wetland is at the lower end of a drainageway that conduct surface water and stormwater runoff from the surrounding development and farmland upstream. The wetland will be filled for the construction of a stormwater detention facility. The Technical Evaluation Panel reviewed the alternatives and found that they meet the minimum standards for sequencing. The TEP agrees that avoidance of the wetlands is not feasible due to the configuration and location of the wetlands and development to the south of the Arcon Property. The applicant proposes replacement with 0.75 acres of restored wetlands, 0.79 acres of public value credits (buffer around wetland), and 1.02 acres of new wetlands in a wetland bank located in Dodge County within the Zumbro River watershed. The TEP recommended approval of the wetland replacement plan. nning Staff Recommendation% The staff recommends approval of this replacement plan with two conditions: 1. that the applicant provide a Letter of Credit to the City, and complete the wetland rules replacement procedures by completing the purchase of credits and submittal of a wetland credit withdrawal form. 2, that the applicant must submit a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for the restored wetlands and the public value credit wetlands. City Council Action: 1. If the council agrees it should pass a resolution approving the replacement plan. Attachments: 1. Report from the applicant. Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Attomey 3. City Administrator's Office 4. Planning Department File 5. Applicant COUNCIL ACTION: Motionby: second REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 6( ' DATE: 5/7/01 NDA SECTInN: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO_ CONSENTAGENDA Public Works D-90 ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: MnDOT / City Maintenance Agreement R. Freese The Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City have had an annual routine maintenance agreement for many years for the section of TH 63 (Broadway Avenue) from 6u' Street South to 1 P Street North a total distance of 1.304 miles. Routine maintenance is defined as pavement patching and crack sealing, street sweeping, snow and ice control, litter removal, boulevard maintenance and traffic signal and sign maintenance. MnDOT has provided the City with a proposed Maintenance Agreement for a two-year period from 7/1 /01 to 6130/03. The proposed agreement reflects an annual increase in the rate for City maintenance of the State Trunk Highway from the current year. The payment to the City is made quarterly and shall be $9,891.90 for the first year and $10,189.44 for the second year of the agreement. As in the past years, the City is not able to recover all of its cost for maintaining the MnDOT Trunk Highway at the proposed rates. Public Works staff has reviewed the proposed Maintenance Agreement with MnDOT and recommends City Council approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Routine Maintenance Agreement with MnDOT for the section of TH 63 from 6t' Street South to 13th Street North for the period of 7/01 /01 to 6/30/03. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 43 / DATE: 5/7/01 Ar_cNDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D-2( ITEM DESCRIPTION: Development Agreement —Circle 19 Amendment #1 PREPARED BY: M. Nigbur The Owners of the Circle 19 Development and the City Staff have had discussions relating to amending the existing Development Agreement. The purpose of the amendment is to add property area/ownership and clarify some of the sections of the original agreement including Stormwater Management and Streets. Staff recommends the Council approve the Development Agreement Amendment. The developers have executed the agreement. West Circle Drive COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Development Agreement Amendment for the Circle 19 Development with Hartman Farms, Inc., B & H Development LLC, and David T Bishop and Beatrice Bishop Trust. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING (05 � DATE: 5/7101 "^4NDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works 1)-29- ITEM DESCRIPTION: Development Agreement —Kingsbury Hills Amendment #1 PREPARED BY: M. Nigbur The Owners of the Kingsbury Development and the City Staff have had discussions relating to amending the existing Development Agreement. The purpose of the amendment is to clarify the requirements for providing a Secondary Access to serve the property on a temporary and permanent basis. Staff recommends the Council approve the Development Agreement Amendment. The developers have executed the agreement COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Development Agreement Amendment for the Kingsbury Hills Development with Bigelow Enterprises, Inc. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: 07 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 6 DATE: 5/7101 A^mNDA SECTION' ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO - CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D,a3 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Real Estate —Settlement Agreement for Right of Way Acquisition PREPARED BY: Jc.✓ for 481h Street SW — J9545 M. Nigbur i As part of the City's project to reconstruct 48`h Street SW the City was required to obtain additional right of way to accommodate the wider roadway and slopes. City staff pursued acquisition of the needed right of way and had negotiated a preliminarily agreement. This proposed settlement agreement is specifically unique to the property affected by the agreement due to several conflicting discussions between the Staff and the Owner. The Settlement Agreement requires the Owner to dedicate the permanent and temporary land rights needed for 48`h Street SW. In exchange for this dedication the City has agreed to apply the proposed acquisition payment in lieu of the future Substandard Street Charge that will be an obligation of the property when it is developed. The Owners have executed the agreement. ' 11thAvenue �I' f I i : Property !V.3,4 . � 4 W. . I .21 -------------- 48th Street SW "— _�� -- - - - t---^ I - -- rrrl COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the settlement agreement and allow City staff to accept the Deed for the property from Westridge Hills, Inc. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 4 DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO CONSENT AGENDA Public Works 0�. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Pedestrian Facility Agreement — Goodin Company Property PREPARED BY: ls^ M. Baker Staff would offer the following Pedestrian Facility Agreement for consideration by the Council: Goodin Company is the Owner of part of Lot 15, Block 1, Replat of Part of Lot 5, and all of Lot 6, Block 1, Hendrick's Subdivision. The Owner has requested that a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement be approved to address the Owner's obligation for providing a ten (10) foot wide bituminous pedestrian path along the entire frontage of the Property abutting 19t' ST NW. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement with Goodin Company for part of Lot 15, Block 1, Replat of Part of Lot 5, and all of Lot 6, Block 1, Hendrick's Subdivision. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: 1o: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING I i / DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA I Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: Pedestrian Facility Agreement — Rick Hexum, Jr. (1808 3'" Ave SE I PREPARED BY: �V Property) M. Baker Staff would offer the following Pedestrian Facility Agreement for consideration by the Council: • Rick Hexum, Jr. is the Owner of land platted as Lots 1 & 3, Block 1, 1808 Properties. The Owner has requested that a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement be approved to address the Owner's obligation for providing a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk along the entire frontage of the Property abutting 3`d Ave SE. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement with Rick Hexum, Jr. for Lots 1 & 3, Block 1, 1808 Properties. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 073 ' DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D_Q (o ITEM DESCRIPTION: Pedestrian Facility Agreement —Gale Bisping Property PREPARED BY: �vv M. Baker v_� Staff would offer the following Pedestrian Facility Agreement for consideration by the Council: Gale Bisping is the Owner of Lot 1, Block 2, Golden Hill Addition. The Owner has requested that a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement be approved to address the Owner's obligation for providing a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk along the entire frontage of the Property abutting 19'" St SW. co a) v c+� COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 19th St SW Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Pedestrian Facilities Agreement with Gale Bisping for Lot 1, Block 2, Golden Hill Addition. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 14 r DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT! AGENDA Public Works ITEM NO. 0-62 % CONSENT ITEM DESCRIPTION: Amend Owner Contract; Pine Ridge Estates Fourth PREPARED BY: FA Subdivision(J9636) M. Baker Background: • A City -Owner Contract was executed by the City on August 1, 2000, whereby construction of the project entitled 'Basic Construction to Serve Pine Ridge Estates Fourth Subdivision — J9636", was approved. • The Owner has requested that the contract be amended to allow additional construction of public infrastructure necessary to complete construction for Pine Ridge Estates Fourth Subdivision. • An additional Performance Bond and Payment Bond, each in the amount of $600,054.05, have been provided to address the additional work planned for this phase of construction. • Furthermore, a statement regarding Sewer Line Plugs is included in the amended contract. Staff would offer the following Amended Owner Contract for consideration by the Council: • DKMC Development (Owner) & Road Constructors, Inc. (Contractor) are requesting a First Amendment to City / Owner Contract J9636 "Basic Construction to Serve Pine Ridge Estates Fourth Subdivision". COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Amended City / Owner Contract for J9636 "Basic Construction to Serve Pine Ridge Estates Fourth Subdivision". COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 11 DATE: 5/7/00 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT! Public Works ITEM NO. (7a 8 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract — Basic Construction in Greystone Second PREPARED BY: Subdivision (J9797) M. Baker Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: Windsor Well Corporation (Owner) & Rochester Sand & Gravel a Division of Mathy Construction Co. (Contractor) are requesting a City / Owner Contract J9797 consisting of "Basic Construction in Greystone Second Subdivision". 4 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9797 "Basic Construction in Greystone Second Subdivision" COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: } REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING J DATE: 517100 AGENDA SECTION: --[ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works CONSENT AGENDA ;tl ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract— Watermain & Hydrant to Serve the Sleep innHotel - Airport Property (J9782) Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: AGO Airport Hotel Limited Partnership (Lessee) & A.B. Systems, Inc. (Contractor) are requesting a City / Owner Contract J9782 consisting of "Watermain & Hydrant to Serve the Sleep Inn Hotel (Airport Property". co i Q � w at 0 U J CSAH 16 L COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9782 "Watermain & Hydrant to Serve the Sleep Inn Hotel (Airport Property)" COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 8 r DATE: 517/00 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO_ CONSENT AGENDA Public Works - 30 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract — Basic Construction in Orchard Ridge First PREPARED BY: P Subdivision — Phase 2 (J9802) M. Baker 4C Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: K & P Properties (Owner) & Elcor Construction (Contractor) are requesting a City / Owner Contract J9802 consisting of "Basic Construction in Orchard Ridge First Subdivision — Phase 2, consisting of Lots 14 — 20, Block 6, and Lots 8 —14, Block 3". y 5-01 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9802 "Basic Construction in Orchard Ridge First Subdivision — Phase 2, consisting of Lots 14 — 20, Block 6, and Lots 8 —14, Block 3" COUNCIL ACTION: motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 83 DATE: 5/7/00 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works ITEM NO. D-3A;AJ3 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract — Basic Construction to Serve Christ Our Rock PREPARED Subdivision (J9697) M. Ba Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: Christ Our Rock Lutheran Church (Owner) & Elcor Construction (Contractor) are requesting a City! Owner Contract J9697 consisting of "Basic Construction to Serve Christ Our Rock Subdivision'. " h�r�,, RZ. S >= r t l M11y M[ �m � ♦POWx[ ^(/�//^//fin/ COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9697 "Basic Construction to Serve Christ Our Rock Subdivision" COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING O�jb/ DATE: 5/7/00 '--NDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT, 4PREP=EDBY: O. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract — Watermain & Hydrants to Serve Lot 1, Block 1, Cascade Ridge Subdivision — Charter Communications (J9763) M. Baker Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: C.D. Smith Construction (Owner) & Jech Excavating (Contractor) are requesting a City / Owner Contract J9763 consisting of "Watermain & Hydrants to Serve Lot 1, Block 1, Cascade Ridge Subdivision — Charter Communications". z v o' m ti ai,• C y-I�rs COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9763 "Watermain & Hydrants to Serve Lot 1, Block 1, Cascade Ridge Subdivision — Charter Communications" COUNCIL ACTION: Moron by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/00 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works b-33 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract — Basic Construction to Serve Circle 19 Plaza — PREPARED BY: rv� Phase 2 (J9658) M. Baker Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: B & H Development (Owner) & Friedrich Construction (Contractor) are requesting a City / Owner Contract J9658 consisting of 'Basic Construction to Serve Circle 19 Plaza — Phase 2". u W S ' J y. Wl COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J9658 "Basic Construction to Serve Circle 19 Plaza — Phase 2" COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING $9 DATE: 5/07/01 AGENDA SECTION, ORIGINATING DEPT! ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D-34 ITEM DESCRIPTION: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS PREPARED BY: M. Baker The Department of Public Works has received a request on four (4) properties, to voluntarily participate in the City's Regional Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP). This department has reviewed the information for this property and has determined that there is support for participation. The Owners of the following properties have requested voluntary participation in the City's Plan, with the applicable participation fee as follows: • Carpet One Store — Arboretum Special District $ 6,574.00 • Staples Oil Co. —1509 Greenview Dr SW (SDP#01-17) $ 133.00 • Ron Yanish Office Building — Lots 3 & 4, Block 4, Radichel 1st $ 4,210.81 (SDP#01-26) • RC Properties Office Building — Lot 1, Block 1, Circle Drive Business Center 3`d (SDP#01-03 & SDP#01-24) $ 4,361,83 The Owners of these properties have already provided payment for their respective charges. These funds will be deposited upon acceptance by the Council for the property to participate in the City's Plan. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution accepting voluntary participation by the above noted properties, in the City's Regional Storm Water Management Plan. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: qI 5/7101 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: Minnesota Dept of Transportation and City of Rochester Agreement -- Viola Road NE Bike Trail Project (J-4940) ITEM NO. D-35 PREPARED BY: 11 D. Nelson �� A Minnesota Department of Transportation and City of Rochester Agreement is needed for the following Federally funded project: S.P. 159-020-06 Viola Road NE Bike Trail from 14th Avenue NE to Parkwood Hills Drive (J-4940) Project cost: $320,000 Federal Funds: $228,500 Local Funds: $91,500 (approved in the 2002 STIP) We are proposing to Advance Construct this project in 2001. As such, an Agreement is required between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Rochester COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the State of Minnesota Agency Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of Rochester for the Federal Participation in Advance Construction for S.P. 159-020-06, Viola Road Bike Trail Project (J4940). COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING q3 ' DATE: 517/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works (7 - 36 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve PREPARED BY: Woodland Hills Subdivision, J9602 I A-/J. Loehr Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., April 24, 2001 for the following local improvement project: Project No. M005, J9602 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision." The following bids were received: 1. Winona Mechanical $126,373.01 (low bid) 2. Heselton Construction $132,978.20 3. Elcor Construction $134,172.95 4. Swenke Construction $142,995.00 5. Frontier Construction $157,235.94 6. Road Constructors $199,962.44 Engineers Estimate $117,189.90 The Woodland Hills Subdivision sewer and water extension project is included in the 2000 Capital Budget. The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements), Sales Tax revenue, and the Sewer and Water Utility. Estimated sales tax revenue required to fund this project and related WQPP Allowances: Project Construction Cost and Expenses $ 38,700 Sewer and Water Availability Charge Allowances 14,600 Sales Tax Revenue Required $ 74,300 This project involves the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve 6 developed properties within the project Area. Annexation: refer to attached statement regarding annexation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted awarding the contract to Winona Mechanical. Attachment: Location Map Statement of Annexation COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: km OR, all Project No. 'N1005, J9602 Sanitary Sewer and Waterm to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision ;Z4, ('Woodcrest Lane S.W.) qs Statement of Annexation: The City of Rochester annexed the Woodland Hills Subdivision and other lands in Rochester Township that were 100% surrounded by the City. The Minnesota State planning Agency approved the annexation in December 2000. The action taken by the state Planning Agency is currently being challenged in District Court by 12 property owners in the surrounded area. In addition the situation with regards to revisions to annexation laws in the legislation session will be uncertain until the session ends. However, despite these uncertainties, the staff recommends that the City Council proceed to award bids. The City utility services are badly needed in this subdivision. We remain optimistic about the resolution of the uncertainties. In addition our connection agreement language would require the owners to grant the City authority to annex the property on the future, should the State Planning Agency previous decision of the annexation be overturned. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 91 ' DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT, ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works p_317 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve PREPARED BY: the Elmcroft Subdivision Area, J9746 J. Loehr Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., April 24, 2001 for the following local improvement project: Project No. M1-02, J9746 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve Elmcroft Subdivision Area." The following bids were received: 1. Elcor Construction $1,531,771.25 (low bid) 2. Road Constructors $1,542,056.80 3. Swenke Construction $1,548,221.45 Engineers Estimate $1,424,727.50 The Elmcroft Area sewer and water extension project is included in the proposed 2001 Capital Budget. The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements), Sales Tax eligible Water Availability Charges, Water Utility (oversize watermain costs), City Share (City park land) and Sales Tax revenue. Estimated sales tax revenue required to fund this project and related WQPP Allowances: Project Construction Cost and Expenses $ 848,500 Sewer and Water Availability Charge Allowances 190,750 Allowances for Work on Private Property 262,500 Estimated Sales Tax Revenue Required $1,301,750 This project involves the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve 75 developed properties and 17 undeveloped properties within the project Area. Annexation: refer to attached statement regarding annexation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted awarding the contract to Elcor Construction./ �( Attachment: Location Map Statement of Annexation COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: 19 1- Statement of Annexation: The City of Rochester annexed the Elmcroft Subdivision and other lands in Rochester Township that were 100% surrounded by the City. The Minnesota State planning Agency approved the annexation in December 2000. The action taken by the state Planning Agency is currently being challenged in District Court by 12 property owners in the surrounded area. In addition the situation with regards to revisions to annexation laws in the legislation session will be uncertain until the session ends. However, despite these uncertainties, the staff recommends that the City Council proceed to award bids. The City utility services are badly needed in this subdivision. We remain optimistic about the resolution of the uncertainties. In addition our connection agreement language would require the owners to grant the City authority to annex the property on the future, should the State Planning Agency previous decision of the annexation be overturned. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 10( , DATE: 5/7/01 Ar-FNDA SECTION: ORIGINATING KEPT! ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works 0- jg ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve PREPARED BY: the Forest Hills Subdivision Area, J9748 J. Loehr Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., April 26, 2001 for the following local improvement project: Project No. M1-03, J9747 "Sub-Trunkline Sanitary Sewer to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area." Proiect No. M1-04, J9748 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area." Note: The projects were combined as one project for bidding purposes. The following bids were received: 1. Road Constructors $1,767,376.55 (low bid) 2. Elcor Construction $1,792,726.00 3. Swenke Construction $2,049,862.00 Engineers Estimate $1,962,350.50 The Forest Hills Area sewer and water extension project is included in the 2001 Capital Budget. Project J9747 is proposed to be funded from sales tax eligible Sewer Availability Charges (SAC) included in future Utility Connection Agreements, 707 Fund — Sewer Utility for project costs that we don't anticipate will be recovered and internal borrowing from 707 Fund — Sewer Utility to be recovered from Sewer Availability Charges (SAC) included in future Developer Agreements and/or City -Owner Contracts. Project J9748 is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements) and Sales Tax revenue. Estimated sales tax revenue required to fund this oroiect and related WQPP Allowances: Project Construction Cost and Expenses $ 830,250 Sewer and Water Availability Charge Allowances 110,250 Allowances for Work on Private Property 94,500 Estimated Sales Tax Revenue Required $1,035,000 This project involves the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve 63 developed properties and 6 undeveloped properties within the project Area. Annexation: refer to attached statement regarding annexation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted awarding the contract to Road Constructors. (� Attachment: Location Map Statement of Annexation COUNCIL ACTION: Notion by: _ Second by: to: �U Bible College Sub-Trunkline Sewer L Sub-Trunkline Sewer Project No M1-04, J9748 Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area ••••• Sewer & Water Water Only t03 Statement of Annexation: The City of Rochester annexed the Forest Hills Subdivision and other lands in Rochester Township that were 100% surrounded by the City. The Minnesota State planning Agency approved the annexation in December 2000. The action taken by the state Planning Agency is currently being challenged in District Court by 12 property owners in the surrounded area. In addition the situation with regards to revisions to annexation laws in the legislation session will be uncertain until the session ends. However, despite these uncertainties, the staff recommends that the City Council proceed to award bids. The City utility services are badly needed in this subdivision. We remain optimistic about the resolution of the uncertainties. In addition our connection agreement language would require the owners to grant the City authority to annex the property on the future, should the State Planning Agency previous decision of the annexation be overturned. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING IDS i DATE: 5/7/01 Ar:ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING ❑EPT! ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works d -3_I ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposal for Design Engineering Services for basic construction PREPARED BY: to Serve Vacant Land in Sunnydale Subdivision, J9760 " J. Loehr l� The City received two separate petitions to construct a local improvement project in the year 2001 to provide public sanitary sewer and watermain and other public improvements to 5-vacant lots owned by the Thompson Estate, and to vacant property owned by First Pentecostal Church. This is a proposal by McGhie & Betts, Inc. to provide Design Engineering Services to serve these properties in the following local improvement project: Project No. M097. J9760 "Basic Construction to Serve Lots 23 through 32, Block 2, Sunnydale Subdivision." McGhie & Betts, Inc. is recommended for this work since they have previously performed engineering services for the City in Sunnydale Subdivision. Therefore, McGhie & Betts is familiar with the area, and are capable of providing the desired level of Design Engineering Services for the project. The negotiated Design Engineering Service fees for this project are as follow: Lump Sum $28,400 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of Design Engineering Service Agreement with McGhie & Betts, Inc. for a Lump Sum amount of $28,400.00. Attachment: Location Map WQPP, Project Manager Memo McGhie & Betts, Inc. Letter of Proposal COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: COLLEGE VIEW RD E THWY 14 i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING (In DATE: 517/01 er--PNDA SECTION: ORIGINATING ❑EPT, ITEM NO., CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D-40 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary PREPARED BY: Sewer and Watermain to Forest Hills Subd., J9748 J. Loehr i This is a proposal by Yaggy Colby Associates to provide Construction Engineering Services for the following local improvement project: Project No. M1-03, J9747 "Sub-Trunkline Sanitary Sewer to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area." Project No. M1-04, J9748 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve the Forest Hills Subdivision Area." Yaggy Colby Associates is recommended for this work since they provided design engineering services for the project. Therefore, Yaggy Colby is very familiar with the Forest Hills Area, and the plans and specifications, and is capable of providing the desired level of Construction Engineering Services for the project. The negotiated Construction Engineering Services fees for this project are as follow: Actual Cost Not to Exceed $132,500 The award of contract for project J9747 and J9748 is scheduled for May 7, 2001. Execution of this Construction Engineering Service Agreement is conditioned on award of these contracts. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of Construction Engineering Service Agreement with Yaggy Colby Associates for the actual cost not to exceed $132,500.00. Attachment: WQPP, Project Manager Memo Yaggy Colby Associates Letter of Proposal COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING d y' DATE: 5/7/01 eraENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENTAGENDA Public Works b-144 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary PREPARED BY: Sewer and Watermain to Elmcroft Subd., J9746 J. Loehr This is a proposal by WHKS & Co. to provide Construction Engineering Services for the following local improvement project: Project No. M1-02, J9746 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve the Elmcroft Subdivision Area." WHKS & Co. is recommended for this work since they provided design services for the project, are are familiar with the plans and specifications, and is capable of providing the desired level of construction Engineering Services for this project. The negotiated Construction Engineering Service fees for this project are as follow: Actual Cost Not to Exceed $105,485.00 The award of contract for project J9746 is scheduled for May 7, 2001. Execution of this Construction Engineering Service Agreement is conditioned on award of this contract. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of Construction Engineering Service Agreement with WHKS & Co. for the actual cost not to exceed $105,485.00. Attachments: WQPP, Project Manager Memo WHKS & Co. Letter of Proposal COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: it( 5/7Y01 "I�NDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D—`Toi. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Water Tower PREPARED BY: { in Southeast Service Area, J9603 /JAa J. Loehr r This is a proposal by WHKS & Co. to provide Construction Engineering Services for the following local improvement project: Proiect No: M006, J9603 "Water Tower to Serve Southeast Service Area (Rose Harbor Site)" WHKS & Co. is recommended for this work since they provided the design engineering services for this project. Therefore, WHKS is familiar with the plans ann specifications, and is capable for providing the desired level of construction Engineering Services for the project. The negotiated Construction Engineering Service fees for this project are as follow: Actual Cost Not to Exceed $11,220 The project was awarded on November 20, 2000 to CBI. The water tower is scheduled for construction in 2001. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of Construction Engineering Service Agreement with WHKS & Co. for the actual cost not to exceed $11,220.00. Attachments: WQPP, Project Manager Memo WHKS & Co. Letter of Proposal COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: <f3' 517/01 er_cNDA SECTION' ORIGINATING DEPT: Works ITEM NO. D-4 CONSENT AGENDA Public ITEM DESCRIPTION: Proposal for Construction Engineering Services for Sanitary PREPARED BY: ,{ Sewer and Watermain to Woodland Hills Subd., J9602 J. Loehr This is a proposal by Yaggy Colby Associates to provide Construction Engineering Services for the following local improvement project: Project No. MODS, J9602 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve Woodland Hills Subdivision." Yaggy Colby Associates is recommended for this work since they provided design engineering services for the project. Therefore, Yaggy Colby is familiar with the Woodland Hills Area, and the plans and specifications, and is capable of providing the desired level of Construction Engineering Services for the project. The negotiated Construction Engineering Service fees for this project are as follow: Actual Cost Not to Exceed $7,500 The award of contract for project J9602 is scheduled for May 7, 2001. Execution of this Construction Engineering Service Agreement is conditioned on award of this contract. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of Construction Engineering Service Agreement with Yaggy Colby Associates for the actual cost not to exceed $7,500.00. Attachment: WQPP, Project Manager Memo COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING (1`J DATE: 05/07/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS 17'4(� ITEM DESCRIPTION: AWARD OF CONTRACT: (J9725) PREPARED BY: Curb, Gutter, and Overlay on 22nd St NE from 7th Ave to 10th Ave, and R.�Im 7th - 10th Ave's NE from N. Heights Dr to 22nd St NE and 21st Street Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., May 2, 2001 for the following local improvement project: Project Number 6222-1-00 (J9725) Project Name Curb, Gutter, and Overlay on 22nd St NE from 7th Ave to 10th Ave, and 7th - 10th Ave's NE from N. Heights Dr to 22nd St NE and 21 at Street The following bids were received: Total Bid 1. Road Constructors $ 314,686.30 2. Rochester Sand & Gravel $ 350,826.55 Engineers Estimate $ 426,752.25 Protect Background The project feasibility report and assessments were approved during the December 11, 2000, City Council meeting. The project, engineering and construction will be funded with Special Assessments and General Street Resurfacing funds (J-2200). This project will involve the placement of concrete curb/gutter, bituminous street construction, storm sewer modifications, and associated sidewalk repairs. Project Recommendation: The Public Works Department recommends the City Council proceed with an award to the low bidder. Project Location !a r ,y / f i COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopted a resolution awarding the contract, " Curb, Gutter, and Overlay on 22nd St NE from 7th Ave to 10th Ave, and 7th -10th Ave's NE from N. Heights Dr to 22nd St NE and 21st Street" (J9725) to Road Constructors. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: ME, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: U7 05/07/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS (7 qG7 ITEM DESCRIPTION: AWARD OF CONTRACT: (J9723) PREPARED BY: Curb, Gutter, & Overlay on 19th Ave NW from 19th St NW to R. Kelm Ovt Valley High Drive rQc- Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., May 1, 2001 for the following local improvement project: Project Number 6319-4-00 (J9723) Proiect Name Curb, Gutter, & Overlay on 19th Ave NW from 19th St NW to Valley High Drive The following bids were received: Total Bid 1. Rochester Sand & Gravel $ 152,982.13 2. Road Constructors $ 166,087.95 3. Elcor Construction $ 189,838.95 Engineers Estimate $ 185,771.00 Proiect Background The project feasibility report and assessments were approved during the December 11, 2000, City Council meeting. The project, engineering and construction will be funded with Special Assessments and General Street Resurfacing funds (J-8308 & J-2201). This project will involve the placement of concrete curb/gutter, bituminous street construction, storm sewer modifications, and associated sidewalk repairs. Proiect Recommendation: The Public Works Department recommends the City Council proceed with an award to the low bidder. Project Location 1 1n J..t 4 A i COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopted a resolution awarding the contract, " Curb, Gutter, & Overlay on 19th Ave NW from 19th St NW to Valley High Drive " (J9723) to Rochester Sand & Gravel COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING I( / DATE: 05/ 7101 er_FNDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: ADVERTISE FOR BIDS: (J9777) PREPARED BY: Traffic Calming on Fox Valley Drive from 23rd Ave SW to Salem Rd R. Kelm This is a request for a resolution to advertise for bids for the following project: Proiect Number M1-18 (J9777) Project Name Traffic Calming on Fox Valley Drive from 23rd Ave SW to Salem Rd Proiect Background The existing 44' wide urban state aid street was constructed with sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, sub drain, and concrete curbing in 1991. At the request of the property owners an informational meeting was held on February 22, 2001. The Project and Assessment Hearing were conducted by the City Council on April 16, 2001. The City Council approved the Project and directed Public Works staff to proceed with the Project. �- �',�y rR�� R Project Location-TI N . ti� 'w iiI x a ?i�ery c 11 6ti� COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A resolution should be adopted authorizing the City Clerk to advertise for bids and conduct a bid opening on M*Jft'2dQ,1 at 11:00 AM. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING (�1 / DATE: 05/07/01 AGENDA Ic CONSENT AGENDA ORIGINATING DEPT: PUBLIC WORKS ADVERTISE FORBIDS: (J9724) Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 1 st St SE from 13th Ave SE to 15th Ave SE This is a request for a resolution to advertise for bids for the following project Project Number 6201-2-00 (J9724) ITEM NO�!/� .. D "Y f PREPARED BY: R. Kelml�� Protect Name Curb, Gutter & Overlay on 1st St SE from 13th Ave SE to 15th Ave SE Project Background The existing street was constructed with concrete curbing in 1955. The age and deterioration of the concrete curb and gutter dictate replacement. At the request of the property owners an informational meeting was held on October 17, 2000, The Project and Assessment Hearing were conducted by the City Council on December 11, 2000. The City Council approved the Project and directed Public Works staff to proceed with the Project. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A resolution should be adopted authorizing the City Clerk to advertise for bids and conduct a bid opening on June 6, 2001 at 11:00 A.M. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING {;?z DATE: 5/7/01 r. AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: CONSENT AGENDA I Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: Supplemental Agreement #1; Project 7106-98 (J9508) East Frontage Road, Hwy 52; Pennington Ct. to 55th St. N.W. ITEM NO. D- 48 PREPARED By: n4 T'h M. Easley,�,4 The plans provide for widening and paving improvements to the East Frontage Road of HWY 52, from Pennington Court N.W. to 55th St. N.W. Roadway widening required the acquisition of additional right of way from a major shopping center. Unbeknownst to either the City or the Retailer a underground electrical system was buried in the newly aquired right of way. During the course of excavation for roadway widening, a electrical cable was damaged that caused futher damage to the Retailer's sign message board. The Engineer has prepared Supplemental Agreement #1; Project 7106-98 (J9508) in the amount of $9,163.40 to cover the cost of : 1. Repairs to the message board and electical cable. 2. Relocation of the cable out of the roadway limits. Public Works has reviewed the costs associated with this work, and find them consistent with electrical work on other projects. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution authorizing payment of Supplemental Agreement #1; In the amount of $9,163.40; Project 7106-98 (J9508) East Frontage Road, HWY 52. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING (a s DATE: 5/7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENTAGENDA Public Works �..i ITEM DESCRIPTION: Supplemental Agreement #1; Project 2323-2-97 (J4890) PREPARED BY: U1 Mayo Run Environmental Corridor Pond Improvements 9� M. Easley The Plans provide for the excavation of drainage channel and three storm water ponds, to provide flood control and storm water quality to the Mayo Run Watershed. Portions of the ponds were in existing wetlands, which required permit from various agencies. The Contractor was allowed to begin work with the understanding that the necessary permits were secured. After commencement of the work it was determined that the permits had not cleared all the necessary processes required. The Contractor then had to alter his work and work around the wetland area, causing the need for additional equipment and delays to the project schedule. The Engineer has prepared Supplemental Agreement # 1; Project 6323-2-97 (J4890) in the amount of $69,986.64 to cover the cost of: 1. Lost of efficiency due to Wetlands site restriction. 2. Additional equipment to haul materials around the restricted area and to regrade the portions of the work after permits were issued. 3. Additional dewatering cost for the extended time through the restricted period. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution authorizing payment of Supplemental Agreement # 1; in the amount of $69,986.64: Project 6323-2-97 (J4890) Mayo Run Environmental Corridor Improvements. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1A'7 DATE: 517/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D- 0 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Supplemental Agreement #1; Project M026 (J9656) PREPARED BY: Public Improvements in Rose Harbor Subdivision D L M. Easley The plans provide for the installation of sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain improvements in Rose Harbor Subdivision. During the installation of underground improvements and roadway construction, rock formations were encountered at locations and elevations not fully anticipated. It then became necessary to renegotiate a unit price for rock excavation to properly complete the improvements. The Engineer has prepared Supplemental Agreement #1; Project M026 (J9656) in the amount of $66,640.00 to cover the cost of : 1. Rock Excavation — Watermain, 491.0 cubic yards. 2. Rock Excavation — Service Connections, 563.0 cubic yards. 3. Rock Excavation — Storm Sewer, 612.0 cubic yards. Public Works has reviewed the unit cost associated with rock excavation on other Public Contracts and find these costs within the normal bidding range. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution authorizing payment of Supplemental Agreement #1; In the amount of $66,640.00; for Project M026 (J9656) Public Improvements in Rose Harbor Subdivision. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING lag DATE: 5-07-01 orENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Public Works I D- 51 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Advertise for Bids-2001 Restoration of the Center Street Ramp I PREPARED BY: w D. Rossman This is a recommendation to advertise for bids for City Project City Project 8215-36-01 (J-2592) "2001 Restoration of The Center Street Ramp". Walker Parking Consultants, Inc has prepared the Plans and Specifications. The work consists of repairing various sections of the concrete items, the expansion joints, restoring the waterproof sealant and caulking, upgrading the lighting system in the stairtowers, painting of the ceilings and beams, adding heaters to the lobbies in the two southerly stairtowers, and modifying the windows in the main cashier booth. This project is listed is listed on page 333 of the 2001 City Budget. The project budget is $452,000. The project schedule is to have the work completed by October 1, 2001. The schedule has been coordinated with the major events at the Mayo Civic Center, the Watchtower Convention, and the Rochesterfest Activities. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the prepared resolution authorizing bids to be received on Wednesday, May 30, 2001 at 11:00 am in the City Clerks Office for: City Project 8215-36-01 (J-2592) "2001 Restoration of The Center Street Ramp" Note to the City Clerk. This should be advertised locally and in the Construction Bulletin. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5-07-01 �ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D� ITEM DESCRIPTION: Riverside Central School Zone Safety Study PREPARED BY: a, D. Rossman The City of Rochester, Public Works Department in cooperation with Independent School District 535, has evaluated the traffic conditions associated with the opening of the new Riverside Central Elementary School, and the closure of both Holmes Elementary School and Hawthorne Elementary School. A School Zone Safety Study Report has been prepared following the guidelines of Chapter 13-2 "School Crossing Protection" of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Traffic Engineering Manual. This report recommends the following Safety items: Agency Responsibility: The City of Rochester is responsible for evaluation of the crossings, preparation of the School Route Plans, and installation of the warning signs and pavement markings. ISD 535 is responsible for employing and training the Adult Guards, Training and scheduling the School Patrol and distribution of the School Route Plans. School Route Plans: The main objective of a school route plan is to minimize the number of streets crossed and to maximize the safety of crossings and routes used by school children. The plan shows the street system, the school, existing traffic controls, established schoorroutes and established school crossings. The plans are to be shared with the staff of the School District, and the parents of the students. School Crossings Evaluated: The following seven locations have been reviewed for establishment as a School Crossing with Adult Guard for Riverside Central School: 1) Add a school Crossing at 5' Avenue & 6' Street SE 2) Add a School Crossing at 15' Avenue & 8 '/z Street SE. 3) Add a School Crossing Guard at 3`d Avenue & 9' Street SE. 4) Retain the existing Crossing Guard at 11'h Avenue & East Center Street 5) Retain the existing Crossing Guard at I I' Avenue & 4" Street SE. 6) Retain the existing Guard at 13'h Avenue & 4" Street SE 7) Designate the Underpass at 4`h Street & 6`h Avenue SE as a School Route Reduced Speed Zone: One location has been reviewed for a reduced speed zone, that being 6i8 Street SE from 4'" Avenue to 6"' Avenue: This location will be the main entrance to the school. This street would qualify for a Reduced School Speed Zone of 20-MPH. Passenger Loading Zones. A Passenger Loading Zone is recommended along the north side of 6" Street from 4`h to 6d Avenue and the east side of 5' Avenue from 5'h Street to 6" Street. Both would be a 15- minute limit from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, School Days Only. New Sidewalk Construction: The School District has agreed to construct Public Sidewalk on the east side of vacated 5`h Avenue SE from 4' Street to 5'h Street as part of the school site improvements. Traffic Engineers Recommendation: Adopt and install the recommended changes before the new school opens. Page 2 of this RCA summarizes changes in traffic control as a result of the closure of Holmes Elementary School and Hawthorne Elementary School. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Listed on page 2 COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: (5x Pape 2 RCA 5-07-01 School Zone Safety Study for Riverside Elementary School Closure of Holmes Elementary School: a) Removal off ve school crossings at 1) East Center St & 10`h Avenue, south leg. 2) 15' Street & I e Avenue SE, north, east & south legs. 3) 151 Street & I1`h Avenue SE, west leg. b) Removal of two School Speed Zones: 1) East Center Street from 10'h Avenue to 11'h Avenue. (Section N ) 2) 1 Vh Avenue SE from Center Street to 151 Street. (Section N ) c) Removal of the followingparkingrestrictions: 1) 15` Street SE / 1000 block North side of the street, Passenger Loading Zone # 17. 2) 1 & Avenue SE / 10 block, East side of the street, No Parking Anytime. 3) 10'h Avenue SE / 10 block, West side of the street from Center Street to % block south, No Parking 8-4 School Days Only. (Section B # 177) Closure of Hawthorne Elementary School: a) Removal of 12 School Crossing at: 1. 4 h Avenue & 8ch Street SE, south, east and north legs. 2. 4s' Avenue & 7a' Street SE, southeast and west legs. 3. 5'h Avenue & 7`h Street SE, west, north & south legs. 4. 5 h Avenue & 8'h Street SE, east, west and north legs. b) Rescind School Time Street Closures at: 1) 4 h Avenue SE / 700 block, (Section Q) 2) 5`h Avenue SE / 700 block, (Section Q) c) Removal of the following Parking Restrictions: 1) 7'h Street SE / 400 block, South side, No Parking Anytime. (Section B 4158) 2) 5 h Avenue SE / 700 block, West side, No Parking Anytime.(SectionB #121) 3) 8 h Street SE / 400 block, North side, No Parking Anytime. 4) 4 h Avenue SE / 700 block, East side, No Parking Anytime. (Section B #109) 5) 4c' Avenue SE / 700 block, West side, No Parking 8-4 School Days Only. (Section B #109.5) Council Action Requested Adopt the prepared resolution adding and deleting the following paragraphs from the Comprehensive Traffic and Parking Resolution Book 1. Section B "No Parking Zones" a) Delete paragraphs 109, 109.5, 121, 158 and 177 2. Section E "Passenger Loading Zones" a) Delete paragraph 17. b) Add paragraph (79.5) to read: 5s' Avenue SE on the east side of the street, from 5u Street to 6'h Street, 15 minute limit, from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, School Days Only. c) Revise paragraph (84) to read: 6'h Street SE on the north side of the street, from 5`h Avenue to 7 Avenue, 15 minute limit, from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, School Days Only 3. Section N "School Speed Zones" a) Delete paragraphs VI a and b b) Add paragraph XXII to read: 60' Street SE from 50' Avenue to 7"' Avenue, School Days Only, 20 MPH. 4. Section Q "Temporary Street Closings": Delete previously authorized street closings for Holmes and Hawthorne Schools. AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ORIGINATING DEPT.: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Parking Restriction Cassidy Drive NE Public Works MEETING L33 DATE: 5-7-01 ITEM NO. D- 153 PREPARED BY: Ly D. Rossman This is a recommendation to restrict parking on the west side of Cassidy Drive NE for a distance of 100 feet either side of the Century High Driveway. This is needed for visibility. A resident of Emerald Hills neighborhood thru the City Police Dept has requested it. Cassidy Drive is 40 feet wide, which is adequate for two traffic lanes and parking on both sides. Students from the school generate the parking demand. The section to be restricted fronts the school property. The request has been reviewed with the school district and they have no objection. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends in favor. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the prepared resolution amending paragraph 303.2 of section B "No Parking Zones" of the comprehensive Traffic & Parking Resolution book to read; (303.2) Cassidy Drive NE, on the west side of the street, for a distance of 100 feet each way from the Century High School Driveway, at all times. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: t. 4�1gca � a ;,;I it i ty. ire v 1 iA d'{t't• } ti ty � � 1� "---'"' > YF� jtS ae.rvx+Er,whia4graw,Ane.eal >r' mat r rt'i t j F Y�� L, d •�' 61 F, t' W"✓ 4rt_ j ��j 1 Vv1 �• �' { � N f � i � j d t \ nt e d i v t t I �x h tit».u-, > >n f'} .•yx i ...t ,i; eri , y.a.'+. 4 _ x->�.. .�. �� _ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1 3 T DATE: 5/07/01 .NDA SECTION: . uusent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPT: Water Reclamation Plant ITEM NO: _ S� ITEM DESCRIPTION: Advertise for bids for the HVAC Air Handling PREPARED BY: Unit Replacement at theWater Reclamation Plant Lyle J. Zimmerma The HVAC air handling unit at the Water Reclamation Plant is approximately 20 years old and no longer serviceable and needs to be replaced. The cost for this replacement was included in the 2001 operating budget for the Water Reclamation Plant under maintenance of buildings and grounds. Council Action Requested: Approval to advertise for bids for the replacement of the HVAC air handling unit at the Water Reclamation Plant. ` )UNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: To: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING t37 DATE : 5/07/01 ENDA SECTION: nsent Agenda ORIGINATING DEPT: I Water Reclamation Plant ITEM NO: S� ITEM DESCRIPTION: Advertise for bids for the Process Control Computer replacement at the Water Reclamation Plant PREPARED BY: Lyle J. Zimmcrmagy j The Process Control Computer at the Water Reclamation Plant is approximately 20 years old and nee to be replaced. This project was included in the 2001 - 2006 Capital Improvements Plan on page 56, Item 6, Project J4378. Council Action Requested: Approval to advertise for bids for the replacement of the Process Control Computer at the Water Reclamation Plant. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: To: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5-7-01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONTINUED - PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING G ITEM DESCRIPTION: Land Use Plan Amendment #00-08. The applicant is proposing to PREPARED BY: amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to designate approximately 46 Mitzi A. Baker, acres of land for "commercial' land uses, the property is currently designated for "low Senior Planner density residential' and "medium density residential' types of uses. The property is located along the north side of 48`h St. SW, west of T.H. 63 and east of 111 Ave. SW. May 1, 2001 City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on December 27, 2000. Staver moved to recommend approval of Land Use Plan Amendment #00-08, with staff suggested findings. Quinn seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-3, with Werven, Schultze and Petersson voting nay. Council Action Needed. 1. Continue this item to May 21, 2001. Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Administrator 1. City Attorney: Legal Description attached 2. Planning Department File 3. Kane & Johnson 4. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday may 7, 2001 in the Council 1 Board Chamber at the Rochester - Olmsted Government Center Building COUNCIL ACTION: >n By: Seconded By: Action: ry v )CCF OTER OLMSTED 1PLANNING D , MN�A�TMI Ar'ON.pou ccTEx•MGNrfo lI 744 ceo.rt or WWw.01ms'stltourGyLGMplanNtg G4i•.. o.. GxAt1AAGGD5Ti5 �• May 1, 2001 �V t't' �rl �l 1-�6kf Mr. Tom HexumHexum Companies 1002 N. Broadway Rochester, MN 55906 RE: Property located north of 481' St SW, between T.H. 63 and 74."A've. SW Mr.hexum: I reoeNed your April 26. 2001 letter requesting that the General Development Ptah for the Property lying north of 480 St. SW, between T,H. 63 and 11 " Ave. SW, be revised. The Planning Department received the revised plans on April 30, 2001. There are three applications for this property which have been continued by the City Council In the past, at your request. These applications Include the General Development Plan as well as a Land Use Plan amendment and Zoning District amendmenL Prior to Council action on these applications, staff will need to review and distribute the revised General Development Plan the other public agencies. Per our conversation last week, the Planning Department will request that the City Council continue all three of these applications to the May 21. 2001 City Council meeting. If you haven conflict with this date or will not be able to have a representable present at the meeting, please inform me at your earliest convenience. Nso, during our discussion last week, I suggested that In recognition of your requests to continue these applications In the past, and your current request to revise the General Development Plan, that you waive the 60-day rule under M.S., sec. 16.99, for the purpose of the continuations. Please inform me It you will waive the City's requirement to take action during the continuations that you have requested and also during the continuation that staff will request to facilitate to review the revised General Development Plan. You may contact me at 287.169s, . Sincerely, �G A /ez Td ��/aAe.. '14e ,i�u.16..a.r7 '% dear MiLd A. Baker Senior Planner Ap.� //rfjf�JrGS rrr+y /Ada .r.n aus"xNe CODE so""S-II213 - 61gADOFL-J8 111"OPWa e07*8te222 • HWINNG411M E07r29aa224 PIANNnNGRONING E070E423e . WBIL� aG7i t;.OMS 7} FAX 807n87-2276 'C1 AN Fpnyy GPP Nrry/ MAWATNeA MEMPI Fl REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING ot DATE: 5-7-011 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING f,--a. _.A DESCRIPTION: Zoning District Amendment #00.16 by R.L. Hexum Associates to re- PREPARED BY: zone 36.32 acres from R-1 to R-2 and 45.66 acres from R-1 to M-1. Mitzi A. Baker, May 1,2001 Council Action Needed: 1. Continue this item to May 21, 2001 Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Administrator 3. City Attorney 4. Planning Department File tanning Department, GIS Division ane and Johnson Architects, Inc. 7, Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday May 7, 2001 in the Council ! Board Chambers in the Government Center at 151 4th Street SE. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING �(�� DATE: 5-7-0 f AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: CONTINUED - PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING DESCRIPTION: General Development Plan #159 , 48 Street GDP by R.L. Hexum IPREPARED ABak-er Associates May 1, 2001 City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this item on December 27, 2000 and recommends approval subject to conditions and modifications. Schultze moved to recommend approval of GDP 159 with staff suggested findings_ and conditions and modifications, with #7 to be clarified prior to the Council meeting and with #1 modified to require realignment of the north/south collector road. McGowan seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-1, with Mr. Werven voting nay. Council Action Needed: 1. Continue to May 21, 2001. .,bution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Administrator 3. City Attorney 4. Planning Department File 5. Planning Department, GIS Division 6. Kane and Johnson Architects, Inc. 7. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday May 7, 2001 in the Council / Board Chambers in the Government Center at 151 4th Street SE. JNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: Mitzi Baker 4-26-01 Planning and Zoning We hereby request amendment to our General Development Plan as shown in the attached drawings. Thank you for your patience as our engineers worked through the details and the final public hearingwas-completed Apol 23rd, 2901. --- Thomas M Hexum R.L. Hexum & Associate Inc. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA bLU I IUN: PUBLIC HEARINGS ING DEPT: PLANNING rEM DESCRIPTION: Final Plat #01-15 to be known as Parkside Town homes of Valley Side. MEETING 1 K/ DATE 5-7-01 ITEM NO. ell PREPARED BY: Brent Svenby, May 2, 2001 Planning Department Review: See attached Staff Report dated May 3, 2001. This application includes a request for approval of land disturbing activities defined as Substantial Land Alteration according to Section 62.1101, B of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. The Planning Staff has reviewed the submitted final plat and would recommend approval, however, staff would recommend that the following condition be placed on the Substantial Land Alteration: 1. Staff would recommend that a fence 4' in height must be constructed at the top of the retaining wall, as a safety precaution due to the height of the retaining wall. Council Action Needed: 1. A resolution approving the plat can be adopted. 2. The Council should include a motion to adopt findings to support either approval or denial of the proposed Substantial Land Alteration Activity. Enclosures: (To be submitted separately to the City Clerk by the Planning Staff upon receipt from the applicant) 1. City Clerk's Copy of Applications 2. Recording/Treasurer/Auditor's Statement 3. Recording Fee 4. Title Opinion 5. 1 Original Plat Mylar 6. 3 Mylar Copies of Plat Attachment: K,4 - Staff Report dated May 3, 2001. Distribution: 1. City Attorney 2. Planning Department File 3. Planning Department —GIS 4. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2001, in the Council/Board Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street SE. 5. Brown Herkenhoff, Inc. COUNCIL ACTION: Mouonbv: second I RDE Final Plat #01-15 Parkside Townehomes of Valley Side 800' Notification Distance Ward 4 Stobaugh 04/24/01 u V DO RD 144 SE His Cr SE w 0 w z t- U P r a a Q 0 fil lO I , I I ; I w I p I I I 1 (..I .ro. �wnwl ,x YwJnr xaar i f1N OYOY llM'1001 3'S 3M1M3eY NIOr S 141 liS ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, MN 55904-4744 CQY„r, OF www.olmstedcounty, com/planning Rochester Common Council FROM: Brent Svenby, Planner DATE: May 3, 2001 ��• �pC NESTER•.Ir1,yY�, - rr APO •' • .. .. R.1 TE�.�UGU5K•- RE: Final Plat #01-15 to be known as Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side. The applicant is also requesting approval for a Substantial Land Alteration permit to allow for changing grades more than 10 feet in one area within the development. Planning Department Review: Applicant/Owner: Freedom Development & Consulting PO Box 1643 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Surveyors/Engineers: Brown Herkenhoff,Inc. 1424 2ntl Street North Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 Referral Comments: 1. Rochester Public Works Department 2. Fire Department 3. Park and Recreation Department Report Attachments: 1. Referral Comments (3 Letters) 2. Location Map 3. Copy of Final Plat 4. Copy of SLA Map and Cross Section Plat Data: Location of Property: The property is located along the east side of 401" Avenue SE, east of Eastwood Hills Second Subdivision and south of Trumpeter Drive SE. Zoning: The property is currently zoned R-2 (Low Density Residential) District on the City of Rochester Zoning Map. Proposed Development: This development consists of 3.75 acres of land and is platted as Outlot B, Valley Side Estates. The applicant is proposing to replat the property as Lot 1, Block 1 Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side. Streets: This plat does not dedicate any road right-of-way. The development will be served by public roadways already dedicated in Valley Side Estates. Sidewalks: In accordance with current City policy, sidewalk is _ BUILDING CODE 5071285-8213 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 PLANNING/ZONING 507/285-8232 • WELUSEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 5071287-2275 .w AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Page 2 Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side May 3, 2001 required along both sides of all of the new streets in the subdivision and a 10 foot bituminous trail is required along the east side of 40`" Avenue SE. Drainage: The elevations of this site range from 1,078' along the eastern edge of the property to 1.104 along the western edge of the property. The property drains in an easterly direction. Stormwater will be directed toward the existing stormwater detention pond for the Valley Side Estates Development (Oudot D). Wetlands: The Soil Survey and National Wetland Indicator maps were reviewed for the presence of wetlands. The maps do not indicate the presence of wetlands on this property. Public Utilities: Water and sewer services will need to be extended to serve this development. The public Improvements construction plans have been approved for this development. Spillover Parking: The proposed roadway is adequate to accommodate some of the required spillover spaces. Additional spillover spaces will likely be accommodated within the driveways and the parking bays for the development. Parkland Dedication: This replatting does not required additional dedication of parkland. Public parkland was dedicated when Valley Side Estates (Outlot C) was platted. The applicant will need to provide private recreation space for the townhomes. General Development Plan: The Council approved an amended General Development Plan for this property on September 6, 2000 which is consistent with the layout of this plat. Substantial Land Alteration: This application includes a request for approval of land disturbing activities defined as Substantial Land Alteration according to Section 61.1101, 8 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual (LDM). Section 62.1102 of the LDM allows the City to consider a request for excavation or substantial land alteration as part of a Type III application, such as a final plat, subject to making findings established in Section 62.1105 and 61.146 of the LDM. This development includes a proposal for cut and fill work which involves a grade change of 10- feet or more from the pre-existing grades. The area where grade is proposed to be changed, approximately 14', will occur on the southwestern portion of the site. The proposed work will include the removal of approximately 2,200 cubic yards of material. The material would remain on site and should take approximately two to three weeks to excavate. A retaining wall would be 10 Page 3 Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side May 3, 2001 constructed in the area. The height of the retaining will range of zero to eight feet, with a maximum height of 8 feet. Sections 61.146, 62.1102 and 62.1105 of the LDM are attached. Staff Suggested Findings: If the City Council approves the proposed substantial land alteration, staff recommends the following findings to Section 62.1105 and 61.146 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual: 62.1105 1) The slopes on the site will be a maximum of 3:1. The grading and drainage plans will need to comply with City standards and be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department. A retaining wall with a maximum height of 8 feet will be constructed. In order to ensure safety, a 4-foot high fence should be constructed along the top of the retaining wall. 2) The grading plan for this project needs to be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department and it will document the extent of the work. All cut material will be used to fill in the low areas on the property. Noise and dust control will need to comply with City standards. 3) The equipment conducting the grading work on the property will also be the equipment utilized to move the earth. All excess material will be used on the site. It will not be necessary to truck in fill or haul fill from the site, which will minimize the impact on the surroundings roads. 4) The proposed excavation work should not affect air quality or ground and surface water quality. 5) The proposed grading work should not adversely affect the scenic quality of Rochester. There will not be any steep slopes or exposed rock faces. The natural topography of the area is being re -graded in addition to a retaining wall. 6) The result of the proposed activity will be compatible with existing development and development anticipated in the future. The finished result of the grading work will allow for development that is consistent with the land use plan. 7) The grading will be confined to the property and should not affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. The duration of the excavation activity is expected to be completed in one phase taking approximately 2 to 3 weeks. 8) The grading will only take place during one phase taking approximately 2 to 3 weeks. There are homes in the immediate area that will be visually affected by the grading activity for only a short time during the grading process. Noise and dust control will need to comply with City standards. 9) The grading and drainage plan will need to provide the proper restoration and stabilization in accordance with the adopted codes for the City of Rochester. 10) The grading and drainage plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the City. Stormwater management will be required for the development. 11) The areas of grading do not contain sinkholes or wetlands and should not effect the ground water or surface quality once restoration and stabilization is completed. Page 4 Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side May 3, 2001 (S( ' 12) The grading work is expected to be completed in approximately 2 to 3 weeks. The duration seems appropriate for this type of activity and the size of the project. 13) The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve the grading and drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate permanent and interim erosion and sediment control. 14) Surety will need to be provided that guarantees the site will be fully restored after the completion of the excavation activity. This surety can be provided through the owner -contract process for this development. If grading is to occur prior to an owner -contract, a separate surety will need to be provided. 15) The grading and drainage plan will need to be approved by the Rochester Public Works Department prior to any grading on the property. The Planning Staff would suggest the following findings for Section 61.146: 1) A retaining wall ranging In height from zero to eight feet is proposed to be constructed in the area where the topography is changing more than 10'. In order ensure the safety of pedestrians, a 4-foot high fence should be constructed along the top of the retaining wall. 2) Not applicable. 3) Not applicable. 4) The Rochester Public Works Department will need to review and approve the grading and drainage plan for this work. This plan must accommodate permanent and interim erosion and sediment control. 5) Not applicable. 6) Not applicable. 7) Not applicable. 8) Not applicable. Preliminary Plat: There is an approved preliminary and final plat on this property. The applicant is proposing to replat the property, dedicating drainage and utility easements and controlled access along 40t' Avenue SE. Since there is no new public right-of-way being dedicated, a preliminary plat was not required. Final Plat: Planning Staff Recommendation: 1. The Planning Staff has reviewed the submitted final plat and would recommend approval, however, staff would recommend that the following condition be placed on the Substantial Land Alteration. Page Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side May 3, 2001 Land Development Manual Excerpts Substantial Land Alteration 62.1102 Exempt Activities: 1) Except as required for a reclamation plan, which may be imposed on any of the following activities as part of any required City permit or approval process, the provisions of these Sections 62.1100 through 62.1113 shall not apply to the following activities: a) The land area included within 15' or as reasonably defined by the City Engineer to allow soil stabilization of the identified boundaries of a building submitted for a building footing and foundation permit. b) Stormwater management facilities or other public infrastructure approved by the City. c) Excavations or blasting for wells, tunnels or utilities that have received all necessary governmental approvals. d) Refuse disposal sites controlled by other applicable City, State or federal regulations. e) On -going cemetery (burial) operations. f) Development activity for which a general development plan, subdivision permit or other Type III approval has resulted in the review of the proposed cut and fill work and for which a grading permit is required. To qualify for this exemption, the Council shall have made the findings established in Section 62.1105. g) Uses in the Central Development Core (CDC) District. 62.1105 Findings Necessary for Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit: The City shall approve a conditional use permit authorizing an excavation activity only if all of the following findings with respect to the proposed activity are made, in addition to those listed in Section 61.146: 1) The activity will not result in a danger to life or property due to (1) steep or unstable slopes, (2) unsafe access to the property, (3) excessive traffic, or (4) proximity to existing or planned residential areas, parks and roadways; 2) Visual, noise, dust, and/or excessive on- or off -site environmental impacts on public parks, roadways and residential areas can be adequately mitigated by the Applicant and a fully detailed plan is submitted by the Applicant to demonstrate the mitigation methods to be used, the cost of such mitigation, the source of funds for such mitigation, and adequate legal assurance that all of such mitigation activities are carried out; 3) The use of trucks and heavy equipment will not adversely impact the safety and maintenance of public roads providing access to the site, or such impacts will be mitigated; Page & Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side May 3, 2001 4) The proposed use will not adversely affect air quality or ground water or surface water quality; 5) The proposed use will not adversely affect the scenic quality of Rochester or the natural landscapes, environment, wildlife and wildlife habitat; or if such effects are anticipated to occur, the reclamation plan provides for adequate restoration of the site following completion of the excavation activity; 6) The activity will be compatible with existing development and development anticipated in the future, including other uses as shown in the Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to: patterns of land use, recreational uses, existing or planned development, public facilities, open space resources and other natural resources; 7) The activity will not unduly affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties; 8) The site plan provides for adequate buffers and screening year-round from unsightly features of the excavation operation; 9) The reclamation plan provides for adequate and appropriate restoration and stabilization of cut and fill areas; 10) The excavation activity will not result in negative impacts on drainage pattems or stormwater management facilities; 11) The proposed activity will minimize impacts on sinkholes, wetlands and other natural features affecting ground water or surface water quality, 12) The intensity and the anticipated duration of the proposed excavation activity is appropriate for the size and location of the activity; 13) Permanent and interim erosion and sediment control plans have been approved by the City; 14) Surety has been provided that guarantees the site will be fully restored, after completion of the excavation activity, to a safe condition, and one that permits reuse of the site in a manner compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood plans, the Land Use Plan and applicable City policies. 15) The proposed activity complies with the requirements of the adopted building code. 61.146 Standards for Conditional Uses: The zoning administrator, Commission, or Council shall approve a development permit authorizing a conditional use unless one or more of the following findings with respect to the proposed development Is made: 1) Provisions for vehicular loading, unloading, parking and for vehicular and pedestrian circulation on the site and onto adjacent public streets and ways will create hazards to safety, or will impose a significant burden upon public facilities. 2) The intensity, location, operation, or height of proposed buildings and structures will be detrimental to other private development in the neighborhood or will impose undue burdens on the sewers, sanitary and storm drains, water or similar public facilities. (s3 (5q Page 1 11 Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side May 3, 2001 3) The provision for on -site bufferyards and landscaping does not provide adequate protection to neighboring properties from detrimental features of the development. 4) The site plan fails to provide for the soil erosion and drainage problems that may be created by the development. 5) The provisions for exterior lighting create undue hazards to motorists traveling on adjacent public streets or are inadequate for the safety of occupants or users of the site or such provisions damage the value and diminish the usability of adjacent properties. 6) The proposed development will create undue fire safety hazards by not providing adequate access to the site, or to the buildings on the site, for emergency vehicles. 7) In cases where a Phase I plan has been approved, there is a substantial change in the Phase II site plan from the approved Phase I site plan, such that the revised plans will not meet the standards provided by this paragraph. 8) The proposed conditional use does not comply with all the standards applying to permitted uses within the underlying zoning district, or with standards specifically applicable to the type of conditional use under consideration, or with specific ordinance standards dealing with matters such as signs which are part of the proposed development, and a variance to allow such deviation has not been secured by the applicant. 61.147 Conditions on Approval: In considering an application for a development permit to allow a Conditional Use, the designated hearing body shall consider and may impose modifications or conditions to the extent that such modifications or conditions are necessary to insure compliance with the criteria of Paragraph 61.146. ROCHESTER Minnedota TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Michael J. Nigbur DATE: 5/2/01 (S(;�' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4" Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507.287-7800 FAX — 507.281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for Final Plat #01-15 on the Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side (replat of Outlot'B', Valley Side Estates) property. The following are the Public Works comments on the proposal: 1. A Development Agreement has been executed for this subdivision. Execution of a City -Owner Contract will be required for the hydrant addition, and extension of public watermain within this subdivision. Charges/fees applicable to the development of this property are addressed in the executed Development Agreement , with the exception of: Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division. C:ltempTPO1-15 Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side.doc y . ..'.;`'L�'`-i `c'-•,.;.�".(``. 50.E ALLAJ!£AIG CITY ROCHESTER - -GAP V1' '•�!�-���:•''. ,�i�uzedaL`�z pA./rE O.Ak GUST•`'•` DAVID A. KAPLER, Chief Rochester Fire Department 201 4th Street SE, Room 10 Rochester, MN 55904-3726 (507)285-8072 FAX #(507) 285-8256 DATE: April 26, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness, Planning FROM: Lyle Felsch, Deputy Chief SUBJECT: Final Plat #01-15, Parkside Townhomes of Valley Side, located east of 40ti Ave. SE, south of Trumpeter Dr. SE and west of Peregrine Dr. SE. With regard to the above noted final plat, the fire department has the following requirements: An adequate water supply shall be provided for fire protection including hydrants properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water Division. Hydrants shall be in place prior to commencing building construction. No hydrants locations were shown on this submittal: 0-jA s .l- won ft', wcG 6..6d 4-( /�t,P.'.,0 L Fl — Wa-, 4pr'- L A' 2. Fire department, access streets and roadways shall be as provided in accordance with the fire code, RCO 31 and the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. All fire department access roadways shall be serviceable prior to and during building construction. No access roadways were shown off Peregrine Dr. All street, directional and fire lane signs must be in place prior to occupancy of any residential buildings. 4. All buildings are required to display the proper street address number on the building front, which is plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Number size must be a minimum 4" high on contrasting background when located on the building and 3" high if located on a rural mail box at the public road fronting the property. Reflective numbers are recommended c: Donn Richardson, RPU, Water Division Freedom Development & Consulting, Box 1643, St. Cloud, Mn. 56302 Brown Herkenhoff Eng., 1424 2nd St. N, Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 ROCHESTER PARK AND IK-CREATION DEPARTMENT 201 FOURTH STREET SE ROCHESTER MINNESOTA 55904-3769( TELE 507-281-6160 FAX 507-281-6165 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 25, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness Planning RE: Final Plat #01-15 Outlot B Valley Side Estates Dedication for this plat has been met via dedication of Outlot C Valley Side Estates. 0:\DSTOTZ\2001\DEDICATION\SE 2895\VALLEY SIDE OUTLOT B.DOC � 'i1h, ; I A r VI0S3NNIPI i31SNOO NOIS063 ONV ONOV80 S3V4OHNMC1 30ISAUV I NY1d 10�11NOO 3015 A31, t" j Of I m III. I I 1p va t 11 11,111; u -1j;;1 I i jilt 11 1 , Ill ■ taIs +;; 1- 14 1 J) - - - - - - - - - - VIE 9 1 1 H 1 1Y:Y1 WE, . CIV V1 Brown Herkenhoff Engineers & Land Surveors A Division of Duffy Engineering & Associates, Inc. Brent Svenby Planner Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 Subject: Parkside Townhomes Re -plat Rochester. MN Dear Mr. Svenby: 04-05-01 The parkside twnhomes project includes excavation in excess of 10 feet over an area of approximately 4000 square feet. We are requesting an exemption from the Conditional Use Permit based on the development activity as listed under the Exempt Activities of 62.1102 of the City Of Rochester Zoning Ordinance. This project is being reviewed through the platting process for this piece of property. This project includes the excavation of material as indicated on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated 4-5-01. This excavation will be done to construct the proposed townhcmes as shown on the grading plan. The project includes an area of approximately 5000 square feet which will be excavated in excess of 10 feet. The excavation of this area will include removal of approximately 2200 cubic yards of material. The material removed from this site will be deposited within the Valley Side Estates project and will not be removed from this 40 acre site. The excavation procedure will take two to three weeks for this particular area of the site, however excavation of this entire townhome site could take up to several weeks, depending on the availability of areas to put the material within Valley Side Estates. If you have any questions or need additional information please call 320-258-2914. Sincerely, s4C Brad C. Wilkening , P.E. enc. 1424 2nd Street North, Sauk Rapids, MN E (320) 259-1234 • Fax: (320) 203-1234 i APR 10 2001 32 IN DL4 lJ u u �r APR rn 2001 ROCH STER 0-.-, E PUNNI 0 DEPAI, '�, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING / DATE 5-07-01�� AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING S — 5 VI DESCRIPTION: Final Plat #01-05 to be known as The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 PREPARED BY: Brent Svenby, May 2, 2001 Planning Department Review: See Staff Report dated May 2, 2001 The Planning Staff has reviewed the submitted final plat. Staff would recommend approval of the final plat with the following conditions/modifications: 1. Prior to the recording of the final plat documents, the care and maintenance agreements for the common areas shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Council Action Needed: 1. A resolution approving the plat can be adopted. Attachment: Staff Report dated May 2, 2001. Enclosures: (To be submitted separately to the City Clerk by the Planning Staff upon receipt from the applicant) 1. City Clerk's Copy of Applications 2. RecordinglTreasurer/Auditor's Statement 3. Recording Fee 4. Title Opinion 5. 1 Original Plat Mylar 6. 3 Mylar Copies of Plat Distribution: 1. City Attorney 2. Planning Department File 3. Planning Department —GIS 4. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2001, in the Council/Board Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street SE. 5. Brown Herkenhoff, Inc. i COUNCIL ACTION: motion by: Sewnd by: to: JOL" 4� m! I w U) w 8 Final Plat #01-05 Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 800' Notification Distance Ward 4 Stobaugh 04/25/01 a a 10 ' 00 w J W O m Z) Z J F J Q Z� 1 M J LJLLJ r��f• ✓ 11 n9 I Hf " I Z j ~ ! �� i J• 1: J c i 1 I I " I Iy I I y � �\ YC \.NJ1W• C C\ ------ ----------- ° p J-------- 9Fix? FROM: DATE: NM ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, MN 55904-4744 C o u. T v of www.olmstedcounty.condplanning Rochester Common Council Brent Svenby, Planner May 2, 2001 �isu■uOr■m fN■► offca.0 . tfn�l�1•If0%IJ♦� Final Plat #01-05 to be known as The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 Planning Department Review: Applicant/Owner: Surveyors/Engineers: Referral Comments: Report Attachments: Plat Data: Location of Property: Freedom Development & Consulting PO Box 1643 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Brown Herkenhoff,Inc. 1424 2nd Street North Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 1. RPU Water Division 2. RPU Operations Division 3. Planning Department —Wetlands 4. Planning Department —Addressing 5. Rochester Public Works Department 6. Fire Department 7. Park and Recreation Department 8. MnDOT 1. Referral Comments (2 Letters) 2. Location Map 3. Copy of Final Plat The property is located along the east side of 401h Avenue SE, east of Eastwood Hills Second Subdivision. Zoning: The property is currently zoned R-2 (Low Density Residential) District on the City of Rochester Zoning Map. Proposed Development: This development consists of 5.6 acres of land to be subdivided into 36 lots to be developed with townhomes and 2 common lots. The plat is a replat of Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 The Villas of valley Side. Streets: This plat does not dedicate any road right-of-way. The road right-of-way was dedicated in The Villas of Valley Side plat. This plat is served by Mallard Place SE. BUILDING CODE 5071285-8213 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 5071285-8224 ..w.=--. PLANNING20NING 507/285-8232 • WELL/SEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/267.2275 -ytl d AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Page 2 The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 May 2, 2001 Sidewalks: In accordance with current City policy, sidewalk is required along both sides of all of the new streets in the subdivision and a 10 foot bituminous trail is required along the east side of 401h Avenue SE. Drainage: The elevations of this site range from 1,080' in the southeastern portion of the plat to 1,094' in the northeast portion of the plat. The property drains in a southerly direction. Stormwater will be directed toward the existing stormwater detention pond for the Valley Side Estates Development (Outlot D). Wetlands: The Soil Survey and National Wetland Indicator maps were reviewed for the presence of wetlands. The maps do not indicate the presence of wetlands on this property. Public Utilities: Water and sewer services will need to be extended to serve this development. The public improvements construction plans have been approved for this development. Spillover Parking: The proposed roadway is adequate to accommodate some of the required spillover spaces. Additional spillover spaces will likely be accommodated within the driveways and the parking bays for the development. Parkland Dedication: This replatting does not required additional dedication of parkland. Parkland was dedicated when Valley Side Estates was platted. The applicant will need to provide private recreation space for the townhomes. General Development Plan: The Council approved a General Development Plan for this property on April 3, 2000. On September 6, 2000 the Council approved an amendment to the GDP which is consistent with the layout of this final plat. A final plat was approved for this property on was approved by the City Council on February 21, 2001. At that time the property was platted into two lots. The applicant is now proposing to plat envelope lots around the townhomes that will be constructed on the property. Preliminary Plat: There was not a preliminary plat for this property. No new right-of-way is being dedicated with this Plat. (U_ Page 3 t{r�/ The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 May 2. 2001 Final Plat: Planning Staff Recommendation: The Planning Staff has reviewed the submitted final plat and would recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 9. Prior to the recording of the final plat documents, the care and maintenance agreements for the common areas shall be reviewed and approved by the City. r ROCHESTER Minnaeota TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Michael J. Nigbur DATE: 5/2/01 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4'" Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507-287-7800 FAX — 507-281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for Final Plat #01-05 on The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 (reolat of L1 & 2. B1, The Villas of Valley Side property. The following are the Public Works comments on the proposal: 1. A Development Agreement has been executed for this subdivision. 2. A City -Owner Contract has been executed for this development. Charges/fees applicable to the development of this property have been addressed in the executed Development Agreement and City -Owner Contract for this development. CAtemp1FP01-05 Villas of Valley Side CIC 181 replat4-01.doc 40CNE�TER•yl,, 1, •;�. A14AMERICA CITY ROCHESTER . —•1,. "�, . e ,/�iruce�at� OR'IiEp•AVOV52 •`•� DAVID A. KAPLER, Chief Rochester Fire Department 201 4th Street SE, Room 10 Rochester, MN 55904-3726 (507)285-8072 FAX #(507) 285-8256 DATE: April 26, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness, Planning FROM: Lyle Felsch, Deputy Chief SUBJECT: Final Plat #01-05, The Villas of Valley Side CIC 181, located east of 40th Ave. SE, north of Trumpeter Dr. SE and Mallard Place SE. With regard to the above noted final plat, the fire department has the following requirements: 1. An adequate water supply shall be provided for fire protection including hydrants properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water Division. Hydrants shall be in place prior to commencing building construction. No hydrants locations were shown on this submittal. L"; 5 `"` 'Ff�o�Z w,r'- iI"z �G• c� (L54A,' .( ✓k r F p(� y k....✓ a"A & a,/ ply as v_tlus �4 WLCY'Zke 2. Fire department, access streets and roadways shall be as provided in accordance with the fire code, RCO 31 and the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. All fire department access roadways shall be serviceable prior to and during building construction. No access roadways were shown off of Mallard Place SE. ':)� " "- 3. All street, directional and fire lane signs must be in place prior to occupancy of any residential buildings. 4. All buildings are required to display the proper street address number on the building front, which is plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Number size must be a minimum 4" high on contrasting background when located on the building and 3" high if located on a rural mail box at the public road fronting the property. Reflective numbers are recommended Donn Richardson, RPU, Water Division Freedom Development & Consulting, Box 1643, St. Cloud, Mn. 56302 Brown Herkenhoff Eng., 1424 2nd St. N, Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 9 DATE: 05-07- 1 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. UBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING S -tP M DESCRIPTION: Final Plat #01-16 by Windsor Well Corporation to be known as PREPARED BY: Greystone Second. Theresa Fogarty, Planner May 3, 2001 Planning Department Review: See attached staff report, dated May 2, 2001. Staff is recommending approval subject to the following conditions or modifications: 1. The Plat be revised: a. Identifying the 30 foot wide easement that crosses Lots 1-3, Block 2, as a "Drainage and Utility Easement". b. Identifying the 10 foot wide easement along the proposed public street right-of-way as a "Utility Easement". c. Dedicate a drainage and utility easement on Lots 1, Block 4 and Lot 3, Black 3, as shown on the approved grading plan. 2. A temporary turn -around and associated easements shall be provided at the northerly extent of Sherburn Place SW, prior to recording the final plat documents. 3. Outlots A and B shall be dedicated to the City. Council Action Needed: 1. A resolution approving the plat can be adopted. Enclosures: (To be submitted separately to the City Clerk by the Planning Staff upon receipt from the Applicant) 1. City Clerk's Copy of Applications 2. Recording Statement 3. Treasurer/Auditor's Statement 4. Recording Fee 5. Title Opinion 6. 1 Original Plat Mylar 7. 2 Mylar Copies of Plat Attachments: 1. Staff report dated, May 2, 2001. Distribution: 1. City Administrator 2. City Clerk 3. City Attorney 4. Planning Department File 5. Planning Department, GIS Division 6. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2001 in the Council Chambers at the Rochester / Olmsted County Government Center. OUNCILACTION: Moloney: Second by: to: (MT..IV TJATO 11 �y.. T ga ' P :Qr 4 v Si � W ACV j ! at! tY� J O 7� 3 yyy !� aaa gF � P4 3'80•M-01 N �I 3 i"O J, S aIs m 0 t x 0 0 1 a 11 • t I�.t r!; 1 y,t i nDIvnd'O gut �111. •� `I ! /,%' � i� /i; � / lei°'*`•. , r , l)��,' 'r✓ � �i%r�i' �� :;' „maxammx.mew � A Its .t�tt�x�t-3rr � ! /- i / '/ ,•Z]; ,I i � �1/ � Q:9 l3@xi �3�3�1F�1$ � . C rltmemem,e=zx11e r. • i� J •• x3 iia 'd Tx rt r �r uo m♦ :m � � �R �r i• a0.. At �E \ 6 y6d g �� �i� iy� J,._... -gig..Fig��1 sIf i�� E�:ii t--i .=LL K� ai 6•;� I �I ' I G & I €tie ' 4p$ �, �s� i�94± I 6t I.; & ?6 ;al ° I G FF°°EGE D L O C6 ER Eli F? 4FiE G P. El Y S T 0 n E,,' u B4c a Ea. E3 __ a m E ', a 51 � SH£RBU !'LACE n' `� ! • v T _ ^ • G• � d O a ar,. .. i �Grpe 9g£}-gF:4"£3e ? .e:pao � Y $I sE'e � Tie Np R�i}pM- `$ •";"' �. 'iE� SI YTcSFP}6i�stt �E ES 1 g5S Tg4 , ° III$ 06 v GI: n �.F iJ r,. ae e F�.9 �':eFaci�`�°°F £ '" •i!€9 '6 a c to sG @ 1_ ^ : A e � cn 1f� Y�v- GEe.� � 5• - � � a T °Ee F�a::eg• Y. eE °e�E e' s•� c n� � �. five. -' �,yr 5 H c m =EE;Tea°°G£°.Yc�,.��' S5 F�� s S E Fe Z �. • r „ P;,.. �e gri y`e o°s ° s �c $ti r";+•r E eB'G9T GYpY E'RiI€` •� �� F g'e .E L" ieee-E€e_=F�$¢Yc,�4 Gee .g�j�EF+i:gT:^cpe Fa- £E •� y��„ xAr4 r O �:E G69 6 ;; � � q • h r-�ST1�-e:�T€�T:rGi FFai I: SE:°Tes£`.ErE � FBse it l .•iC �� 6a�� \\ 8— .r `' E EiE_EF3;I .•�ISyf'�• ; re �i � ` Y8 -• \ �' ~x1 `�1 Y�iC Ect 9C ' T5°". YJE'•gY3T£g�o F 5:: -s i .?c!°•',b ey €. ey e E�YNme�.ga a 6Ceej9Spk • u Y `I G6 r ai nu • a5 jGCr j� y'10•M \ E`MKit• CIS IS ,� it E: o� C�'•g;, t� \ Ste- ,1pzf o $ I 3 £yen aE E i EMI 6i �Ea6 d t��w��v it"� 'ice — F it E: B qe }il 15 T it E` G ♦ _ to _ Ei F GE F '26 EG "f tR„C,� a-1� waex i if fie° cpc •7. u. S- P, 5.89 i� �•F EI 9F 4 ^ga aG a�.tGxs.ws e 2 Et it it � 'a? `I 5�; a F' glSpE1 O �� �> `?•xx � r �I.. Z }� c^ T ij N c JA °ar v W v e'= a f'•F .� E �• O T I ��.g ti �x � } t• �p PTo dl,� -€ 1` ` �° e6G R �G cs& O ��f- ��• a.� i At � � O S ` a f !Il s �+ue • f!1 ISN N LM 9.I�v�..i ! � �9'. 0 ) [Y II E i1S�0.'a, ww s Apn.0 s :J 4 ? O .L EI rn z A .�j p gB aZJgQ1 iva : 6 �S — !�1"b •ti" muG •W aIN aw v 7 5 0MINIS- E aai G°i°�`iadu UNPLATTED Y �- Z002 ME= AM '- 'SJJQ 9NINNYIJ W10-I100H SLZZ M L02 XVH H:91 I0/LO/SO ' r f TO: Judy Scherr City Clerk FROM: Theresa Fogarty Planning Department DATE: May 7, 2001 RE: May 7, 2001 - City Council Meeting Item Number: E-6 Greystone Second: Condition Number 1 "Revise the Plat" can be removed. A Revised plat was submitted to the Planning Department and will be faxed to with this message. Theresa ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 - Rochester, MN 55904-4744 COUNTY OF www.olmstedcounty.com/planning TO: Rochester Common Council FROM: Theresa Fogarty, Planner DATE: May 3, 2001 RE: Final Plat #01-16 by Windsor Well Corporation to be known as Greystone Second. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide approximately 22.21 acres into 18 lots for a single family development and two outiots. The plat allows for the continuation of Sherburn Place SW and Wicklow Lane SW and dedicates the right- of-way for three roadways. The property is located east of 181h Avenue SW, north and east of Greystone and south of the Bamberwood First Subdivision. Planninq Department Review: Applicant/Owner: Windsor Well Corporation 3015 SW 181h Avenue Rochester, MN 55902 Surveyors/Engineers: McGhie & Betts, Inc. 1648 Third Avenue SE Rochester, MN 55904 Referral Comments: 1. Rochester Public Works Department 2. Rochester Public Utilities — Water Division 3. Rochester Park & Recreation Department Report Attachments: 1. Referral Comments (3 Letters) 2. Location Map 3. Copy of Final Plat 4. Copy of Preliminary Plat Plat Data: Location of Property: This plat is located east of 18u' Avenue SW, north and east of Greystone and south of the Bamberwood First Subdivision. Zoning: This property is zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family) district on the City of Rochester Zoning Map. BUILDING CODE 507/285-8213 - GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 - HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 «r�ww PLANNING(LONING 507/285-8232 - WELUSEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/287-2275 �� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER )�� Page 2 ( Final Plat Greystone Second May 3, 2001 Proposed Development: This development consists of 22.21 acres of land to be subdivided into 18 lots for a single family development and two outlots. Roadways: This plat dedicates the right-of-way for three new roadways. All the roadways are proposed to be designed as rural section roadways. The roadways are on 66 feet of right-of-way, with two 12-foot driving lanes; a 2 —foot paved shoulder one side, and a 6- foot paved pedestrian path on the other side with a ditch on both sides of the paved surface. The first roadway is a continuation of Sherburn Place SW, continuing to the north. The second roadway is a continuation of Wicklow Lane SW, continuing to the east providing a connection to the property to the east. The third roadway "Cates Lane SW", ends in a cul- de-sac off of "Wicklow Lane SW" to the south. Wetlands: Minnesota Statutes now require that all developments be reviewed for the presence of wetlands or hydric soils. The Soils Survey does not indicate hydric soils within this Plat. Public Utilities: Water and sewer can be extended to the site. The applicant has entered into Development Agreement with the City. Public improvement plans have been approved by the City. Spillover Parking: As per Section 63.426 of the LDM, all residential development must provide spillover parking for service vehicles and visitors at a rate of 1.2 spaces per dwelling unit, in addition to the required off-street parking. This additional parking may be provided either as off-street or on -street. This development requires 22 spillover parking spaces. With the roadways being designed as rural roadways parking will be restricted on the roadways. Driveways are permitted to be used as areas suitable for spillover parking, Parkland Dedication: Dedication for this plat has been met via the dedication of Outlot A and B of Greystone First. No additional parkland dedication is required. General Development Plan: There is not an approved General Development Plan for this property. A GDP was never submitted for this property. Page 3 Final Plat Greystone Second May 3, 2001 Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat for this area was approved by the Council on August 2, 1999. The approval of the preliminary plat was subject to five (5) conditions: The conditions are listed below: 1. The property owneriapplicant is responsible for identifying any wetlands on the property that may exist and securing the proper permits prior to disturbing any wetlands that may be located on the property. 2. A 10-foot wide pedestrian path be provided concurrent with the development along 18'" Avenue SW in lieu of a 5-foot concrete sidewalk, if determined feasible by Rochester Public Works. 3. Outlots B, C and D shall be dedicated to the City, as well as Outlot A, if necessary for public benefit or public services. 4. The existing access location in the northwest corner of the property be removed at such time that Public Works determines it is not needed. 5. The applicant must dedicate the right-of-way for a roadway to the property to the east, with the exact location to be determined at the time of platting. Planning Staff and Recommendation: The Planning Staff has reviewed the submitted final plat and find that it is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. The staff would then recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The Plat shall be revised. a. Identifying the 30 foot wide easement that crosses Lots 1-3, Block 2, as a "Drainage and Utility Easement". b. Identifying the 10 foot wide easement along the proposed public street right-of-way as a "Utility Easement". c. Dedicating a drainage and utility easement on Lots 1, Block 4 and Lot 3, Block 3, as shown on the approved grading plan. 2. A temporary turn -around and associated easements shall be provided at the northerly extent of Sherburn Piece SW, prior to recording the final plat documents. 3. Outlots A and B shall be dedicated to City. Reminder to Aoplicant: • Prior to development, the property owner will need to execute a City/ Owner Contract for construction of all public infrastructure and utilities to serve this subdivision. 1169 ROCHESTER Minnedota TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Michael J. Nigbur DATE: 5/2/01 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4" Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507-287-7800 FAX — 507-281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for Final Plat #01-16 on the Grevstone Second property. The following are the Public Works comments on the proposal: 1. A Development Agreement has been executed for this subdivision. 2. Execution of a City -Owner Contract will be required prior to construction of the public street & utilities within this subdivision. 3. A temporary turn -around is needed at the northerly extent of Sherburn Place SW. 4. The 30 foot wide easement that crosses Lots 1 — 3, Block 2, is unidentified on the plat. It should be identified as a Drainage & Utility Easement. 5. The 10 foot wide easement along the proposed public street rights -of - way is unidentified. It should be identified as a Utility Easement. Charges/fees applicable to the development of this property are addressed in the executed Development Agreement, with the exception of: Contribution for First Seal Coat @ $0.45 per square yard of public roadway surface. Traffic Signs as determined by the City of Rochester Traffic Division: 2 Street Name Signs C:%temp1FP01-16 Greystone 2nd.doc ru we pGedye, ive de6ivcr April 25, 2001 Rochester -Olmsted CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904-7996 REFERENCE: Final Plat #0146 by Windsor Well Corporation to be known as Greystone Second. Dear Ms. Garness: Our review of the referenced final plat is complete and we have no objections. The final utility plans have been approved. Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions. Very truly yours,(u. o- ".JA 1 w1"L Donn Richardson Water C: Doug Rovang, RPU Mike Engle, RPU Mark Baker, City Public Works Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813 telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542 r park & recreation DATE: April 27, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness Planning RE: Final Plat#01-16 Greystone 2nd ROCHESTER PARK AND I. -CREATION DEPARTMENT 201 FOURTH STREET SE ROCHESTER MINNESOTA 55904-3769 TELE 507-281-6160 FAX 507-281-6165 MEMORANDUM Dedication for this plat has been met via the December 2000 dedication of Outlot A and B Greystone 1st. No additional dedication is required. Applicant: Windsor Well Corporation 3015 18 Avenue SW Rochester MN 0:\DST0TZ\2001\1)EDICATI0N\SW 2897\GREYSTONE 2ND.DOC REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING (? 9 / DATE: 5-7-01 .NDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING r ITEM DESCRIPTION: Land Use Plan Amendment #01-02 by Willmar Investments to amend PREPARED BY: the land use designation from "low density residential' to "medium density residential" on Mitzi A. Baker, approximately 1.47 acres of land. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Senior Planner Apartments north of f d Street NW and west of T.N. 52. May 2, 2001 City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on April 11, 2001. Staver moved to recommend approval of Land Use Plan Amendment #01-02, with staff suggested findings. Quinn seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Council Action Needed: 1. The Council shall hold a public hearing. The Council may approve or deny this petition. The Council's decision must be supported by findings based on the criteria listed in the Land Use Plan (as included in the staff report). 2. If the Council wishes to proceed with the land use plan amendment as petitioned, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law. Attachments: 1. Staff Report dated April 5, 2001 2. Minutes of April 11, 2001 CPZC Meetings Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Administrator 3. City Attorney: Legal Description attached 4. Planning Department File 5. McGhie & Betts, Inc. 6. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday May 7, 2001 in the Council I Board Chamber at the Rochester - Olmsted Government Center Building COUNCIL ACTION: " 'ion By: Seconded By: Action: vZONE ANGE H J a' i DESCRIPTION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, HINDERMANN FITZGERALD SUBDIVISION HWy 14 f< com NORiVAYESf ME'9'/4WSEC 34 107-14 NE1/4 SWI 4 SEC 34-107-14 NOW LNE NEIA SW1/4 SEC 34 r ?Y PARK ouraor'c � ourzor 'A' FF 1.47__ ACRES* T"0r 5 L 0 CK 1' 7 � aor s 6 0 z 2nd STREET N. W. 3 Li x z Z V '< 1ST ST NW 1 ST ST NW Far : ' - WILMAR INVESTMENTS DR4WrN er. JJJ ROCHESTER SAND & GRAVE McGhie BettS,Inc. a� 03/14/01 4105 E. RIVER ROAD NE ca wmy E�q,n�., Land sun eyors ROCHESTER, MN onners ACCT. No.: 1705/0584 55906 1648 3rE AVE. S.E. R=hnkq MN. 55904 s7-269-3919 CARD No.: 0584ZCE ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPA 1ENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, MN 55904-4744 COUNTY OF TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner DATE: April 5, 2001 �c�rn� pug! �w.g.w\�.cac!9�� �a{\t%,MPS I RE: Land Use Plan Amendment #01-02 by Willmar Investments to amend the land use designation from "low density residential' to "medium density residential' on approximately 1.47 acres of land. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Apartments north of 2"d Street NW and west of T.H. 52. Planning Department Review: Petitioner: Willmar Investments Rochester Sand & Gravel 4105 E. River Road NE Rochester, MN 55906 Consultant: McGhie & Betts, Inc. 1648 Third Ave. SE Rochester, MN 55904 Location of Property: The property is located north of 2nd St. NW, west of the west Frontage road for T.H. 52 and adjacent to the Quarry Ridge development. Requested Action: The applicant requests to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to designate approximately 1.47 acres of land for "medium density" uses. The property is currently designated for "low density residential' uses. A zoning district amendment and General Development Plan area being considered concurrent with this application. ExistingLand Use: The property is currently designated for "low density" residential uses on the Land Use Plan and is undeveloped. Proposed Land Use: The applicant has also filed a Zoning District Amendment and General Development Plan for this property. These petitions are being considered concurrent with this request. The applicant is BUILDING CODE 507/285-8213 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 ,...w,„,.. PLANNINGIZONING 5071285-8232 • WELUSEPTIC 507/285-8345 ^ FAX 507/287-2275 (� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER gv' Paget LUPA 01-02 April 5, 2001 proposing to develop the property with multi -family residential uses. Adjacent Land Use and The property to the north and west is zoned R-1 Zoning: (Mixed Single Family Residential). Ongoing mining of sand and gravel materials occurs adjacent to this property. The property to the south is zoned R-3 (Medium Density Residential) and is the site of the Quarry Ridge Apartments. To the east is an office building in the B-4 (General Commercial) district that will be removed when the T.H. 52 corridor is reconstructed through this area. Transportation Access: Access to this property will be to the west Frontage Road of TH 52. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on March 29, 2001 at Folwell Elementary School. A summary is attached. A representative from McGhie & Betts Associates was the only one in attendance. Wetlands: It appears as though hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and submitting the information as part of this application. Referral Comments: 1. Rochester Public Works 2. Planning Department —Transportation Div. 3. John Harford, Wetland LGU 4. Rochester Public Utilities - Water Division 5. Rochester Fire Department Report Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map 3. Referral Comments (5) 4. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Analysis: The City approved a Land Use Plan amendment in 1999 to amend the Land Use Plan to facilitate the development of the Quarry Ridge apartments. The property included in this petition adjacent to the Quarry Ridge development. The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan identifies location criteria for "medium density residential' types of uses as follows: a) Having level to fairly rolling terrain, outside flood prone or poorly drained areas, or areas with steep slopes. b) Inclose proximity to commercial areas, employment centers, recreation areas, or other facilities that serve smaller households. • i Page 3 1 E3 LUPA 01-02 April 5, 2001 c) Having good access by means of collector, arterial, and expressway streets and transit systems to employment center, commercial areas, and community facilities. d) Buffered from the adverse influences of commercial, industrial, and other incompatible activities. Staff Suggested Findings: a) The property has fairly level terrain. Much of this site is encumbered by the 100 year flood plain. A conditional use permit was approved in 2000 (CUP #00-03), however, to allow for this site to be elevated through the placement of fill. b) This site is in close proximity to existing commercial areas, employment centers, and recreation areas. c) This property will have access to fd St. SW, which is designated as an existing arterial road on the Thoroughfare Plan. After the TH 52 reconstruction, 18d' Ave. between rd St. SIN and 1" St. S W, and 1s' St. SIN east of le Ave., will become part of the frontage road system and apartment residents will be able to access the Frontage Road without having to travel north of 1st St. SW. Upon completion of area improvements, this site will have good vehicular and pedestrian access. d) The abutting property to the south is the Quarry Ridge Apartments, currently under construction. Other adjacent lands, to the west and north, include on -going sand and gravel excavation. An office building is located to the east, which will be removed as part of the TH 52 reconstruction project. When this property develops, landscaping and bufferyards will need to be provided in compliance with local regulations. Staff Recommendation: The findings support an amendment to the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to designate approximately 1.47 acres of land for "medium density residential' types of uses. (N fOCHESTIMR Minnesota TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Michael J. Nigbur DATE: 3/23/01 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4" Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507-287-7800 FAX - 507-281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for LUPA #01-02 and ZONE#01- 0 on the Willmar Investments (Lot 4. Block 1. Hindermann Fitzgerald Subdivision) property. The following are Public Works comments on the proposal: A Traffic Impact Report (TIR) may be necessary due to the limited capacity of the street network serving the area, and providing access to this property. C:Vemp\LUPA01-02 - ZONE01-05 Hindermann Fitzgerald L4 B1.doc rWJ 19s . Baker Mitzi From: Johnson,Jos Sent: Friday, March 30, 20D 1 424f To: MITZI BAKER (E-mail) Cc: BILL FITZGERALD (E-mail); BRENT SVENBY (E-mail) Subject: Neighborhood Meeting for Wilmar Investments... Mitzi, The neighborhood meeting for the Wilmar Investments GDP, Zone Change, and LUPA was held last night at 6:30 P.M. in the Folwell Elementary School. There was no response from any of the neighbors. The only one in attendance was myself. If you have any questions or comments please contact me. Thank you, Josh Johnson McGhie & Betts, Inc. Ph. 507.289.3919 Fx. 507.289.7333 i REFERRAL COMMENTS: See additional comments attached to the staff report for General Development Plan #163 PUBLIC HEARINGS: Land Use Plan Amendment #01-02 and Zoning District Amendment #01-05 by Willmar Investments to amend the land use designation from "low density residential" to "medium density residential" and to amend the zoning district from R-1 (Mixed Single Family) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on approximately 1.47 acres of land. The �! property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Apartments north of Z" Street NW and west of T.H. 52. A General Development Plan is being considered concurrent with these applications. I TRO Page 8 City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Hearing Date: April 11, 2001 Ms. Mitzi Baker presented the staff reports, dated April 5, 2001, to the Commission. The staff reports are on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department. Ms. Baker explained that staff received a revised general development plan to show one shared access instead of two. She further explained that condition number one, listed in the staff report, could be eliminated since the applicant submitted a revised plan. Ms. Baker explained that the Commission would need to make three separate motions on the zone change, land use plan amendment, and general development plan. Mr. Josh Johnson, of McGhie and Betts, Inc., addressed the Commission. He explained that all three applications meet the land development manual requirements. He stated that the applicant agrees to the staff -suggested conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Brede asked if the frontage road would be a two-way road. Mr. Johnson responded yes. Ms. Baker explained that the road would be like a local street. Mr. Johnson explained that the development would not create a lot of additional traffic. Discussion ensued regarding landscaping. Discussion ensued regarding the difference between recreation space and parkland. With no one else wishing to be heard, Ms. Petersson closed the public hearing. Mr. Staver moved to recommend approval of Land Use Plan Amendment#01-02 by Willmar Investments with staff -suggested findings. Mr. Quinn seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Mr. Staver moved to recommend approval Zoning District Amendment #01-05 by Willmar Investments with staff -suggested findings: Mr. Quinn seconded the motion. ,The motion carried 7-0:' Mr. Staver moved to recommend approval of General. Development Plan #163 for Lot 1, Block1 Hindermarm Fitzgerald Subdivision by Willmar Investments with staff -suggested findings and conditions, except to eliminate condition number 1 listed in the staff report with regard to providing one access. W. Quinn seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0., ..yam _ ` `•'sa �.. ,* .:xa x ..� T �'`w'":.°gYx 1 .<?� M sx'.,{ .. CONDITIONS: 1. Pedestrian facilities are required adjacentto this development. 2. Parkland dedication for this development shall be met via cash in lieu of land, a • Q' Page 9 l /o City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes l Hearing Date: April 11, 2001 3. At the time this property is re -platted to subdivide the lot into two lots, the applicant shall provide the City with copies of the access easement and access permit(s) from MnDOT that will be necessary to serve this property. Mr. Svenby explained that staff received a r from Andy Masterpole, of McGhie and Betts, Inc., asking that the item be tabled to the om ission's April 9, 2001 meeting. as Boulder Ridge to April 9, 2001. r. Brede Bonded the motion. The motion carried 7_n, Ms. Baker aske\60.500arding ssion to initiate text amendments for the 1 1. Section ding funding required improvements, 2. Section procedures for permit and certificate 3. Interpretrification of garden centers. / and Mr. Brede moved to initiate aVe the foli ing: 1. Section 64.133 regarding i rovements,2. Section 60.500 regarding prmit and certificate approvals, and 3. Interpretation and clarificaenters.Mr. Staver seconded the motion. ried 7-0. 2. Ms. Baker asked the Comm during their regular meeting Ms. Baker explained that Commission to make dem yR they would prefer to or if they would like to I presentation would be a presentation on Decorah shale ,special meeting. and would not require the The Commission a ed to hold a special meeting. They asked staff to N., to set up a meeting at 4:00 p.m. on dnesday, May 16, 2001, in Conference Room A/B locateXat 2122 Campus Drive SE. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5-7-01 I AGENDASECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING S 1g ITEM DESCRIPTION: Zoning District Amendment #01-05 by Willmar Investments to amend PREPARED BY: the zoning district from R-1 (Mixed Single Family) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on Mitzi A. Baker, approximately 1.47 acres of land. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Senior Planner Apartments north of 2,d Street NW and west of T.H. 52. S&Q- , r CPS m i� May 2, 2001 City Planning and Zoning Commission Re' commendation: The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on April 11, 2001. .o,.:,.,9 Disivic{ AF Slaver moved to recommend approval of4: Nse P Amendment #01 with staff suggested findings. Quinn seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Council Action Needed: 1. The Council shall hold a public hearing. The Council may approve or deny this petition. The Council's decision must be supported by findings based on the criteria in the staff report. If the Council wishes to proceed with the land use plan amendment as petitioned, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law. Attachments: 1. Staff Report dated April 5, 2001 2. Minutes of April 11, 2001 CPZC Meetings Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Administrator 3. City Attorney: Legal Description attached 4. Planning Department File 5. McGhie & Betts, Inc. 6. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday May 7, 2001 in the Council I Board Chamber at the Rochester - Olmsted Government Center Building COUNCIL ACTION: Motion By: Seconded By: Action: KOKI � , I WL' me I � No 61, 1 Mw IBM DESCRIPTION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, HINDERMANN FITZGERALD SUBDIVISION FOR : WILMAR INVESTMENTS % ROCHESTER SAND & 4105 E. RIVER ROAD NE ROCHESTER, MN 55906 M A� ST NW McGhie ConaWtinq Engineme 1618 Ire AVE. S.E RocM1nteq Betts,inc. �.nd SurveYom o n MN. MN. 55904 507-289-3919 SLUE: 1" = 400' auwN 6r JJJ _ 04TE: 03/14/01 ACCT. NO.: 1105/0584 C40D NO. : 0584ZCE ROCI3ESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, COUNTY OF TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner DATE: April 5, 2001 DEPAIRMENT MN 55904-4744 RE: Zoning District Amendment #01-05 by Willmar Investments to amend the zoning district from R-1 (Mixed Single Family) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on approximately 1.47 acres of land. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Apartments north of 2"d Street NW and west of T.H. 52. Planning Department Review: Petitioner: Willmar Investments Rochester Sand & Gravel 4105 E. River Road NE Rochester, MN 55906 Consultant: McGhie & Betts, Inc. 1648 Third Ave. SE Rochester, MN 55904 Location of Property: The property is located north of 2nd St. NW, west of the west Frontage road for T.H. 52 and adjacent to the Quarry Ridge development. Requested Action: The applicant requests to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to designate approximately 1.47 acres of land for "medium density" uses. The property is currently designated for "low density residential" uses. A zoning district amendment and General Development Plan area being considered concurrent with this application. Existing Land Use: The property is currently designated for "low density" residential uses on the Land Use Plan and is undeveloped. Proposed Land Use: The applicant has also filed a Zoning District Amendment and General Development Plan for this property. These petitions are being considered concurrent with this request. The applicant is proposing to develop the property with multi -family residential uses. BUILDING CODE 507/285-8213 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 5071285-8224 PLANNING20NING 507/285-8232 • WELUSEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/287-2275 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 1 1 Page 2 April 5, 2001 Transportation Access: Access to this property will be to the west Frontage Road of TH 52. Wetlands: It appears as though hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and submitting the information as part of this application Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on March 29, 2001 at Folwell Elementary School. A summary is attached. A representative from McGhie & Betts Associates was the only one in attendance. Referral Comments: 1. Rochester Public Works 2. Planning Department —Transportation Div. 3. John Harrord, Wetland LGU 4. Rochester Public Utilities - Water Division 5. Rochester Fire Department Report Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Area Zoning Map 3. Referral Comments 4. Neighborhood Meeting Summary Analysis for Zoning District Amendment: Under the provisions of Paragraph 60.338 of the Rochester Land Development Manual, the Commission shall recommend for approval and the Council shall approve, an application requesting an amendment to the zoning map if the amendment satisfies the following criteria: 1) The criteria of this subdivision apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by formal petition. An amendment need only satisfy one of the following criteria: a) The area, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan; b) The area was originally zoned erroneously due to a technical or administrative error; c) While both the present and proposed zoning districts are consistent with the Plan, the proposed district better furthers the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan as found in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, Chapter 3 of the Housing Plan, and Chapter 10 of the ROCOG Long Range Transportation Plan; or d) The area has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to rezone so as to encourage development or redevelopment of the area. Page 3 April 5, 2001 Proposed R-3: The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan designates this property as appropriate for `low density residential" types of uses. A Land Use Plan amendment is being considered concurrent with this application. If the Land Use Plan amendment from "low density residential" to "medium density residential" is approved, rezoning approximately 1.47 acres of land to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) would be consistent with the "medium density residential' land use designation. Rezoning this property would help further the policies and goals found in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, which encourage developing a range of densities and development styles. This will also help to further goals and policies found within Chapter 3 of the Housing Plan. 2) The criteria of this subdivision also apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by formal petition. However, an amendment must satisfy all of the following criteria: a) the permitted uses allowed within the proposed zoning district will be appropriate on the subject property and compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood, and Proposed R-3: Uses within the R-3 Zoning District would be appropriate on the property and compatible with adjacent properties. b) the proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning. (Spot Zoning involves the reclassification of a single lot or several small lots to a district which is different than that assigned to surrounding properties, for reasons inconsistent with the purposes set forth in this ordinance, the state enabling legislation, or the decisions of courts in this state). Proposed R-3: A large portion of this property is encumbered by the 100 year flood plain. A conditional use permit was approved by the City in 2000, however, to facilitate filling this property. Site capacity calculations will need to recognize the mapped floodplain. The applicant's consultant has indicated that the property can be developed in compliance with the zoning regulations, without the need for variances or incentive development permits. Uses within the R-3 district would be appropriate on the subject property and would be compatible with adjacent properties. The amendment to R-3 would be consistent with the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan if the Land Use Plan Amendment being considered concurrently is approved. Rezoning this property would not be considered spot zoning. Staff Recommendation: The staff suggested findings support re -zoning the property included in this application, if the Land Use Plan Amendment (#01-02) being considered concurrent with this application is approved. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING Ia0 DATE: 5-7-01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NOAB PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING 8 „ "A DESCRIPTION: General Development Plan #163 for Lot 4, Block 1 of PREPARHinderman Fitzgerald Subdivision. Mitzi A May 2, 2001 City Plannina and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this item on April 11, 2001 and recommends approval subject three conditions and modifications. Staver moved to approve GDP 163 with staff suggested findings and conditions and modifications with , except to eliminate condition #1 as listed in the staff report since the plan had been updated. Quinn seconded. The motion carried 7-0. 1. Pedestrian facilities are required adjacent to this development. 2. Parkland dedication for this development shall be met via cash in lieu of land. 3. At the time this property is re -platted to subdivide the lot into two lots, the applicant shall provide the City with copies of the access easement and access permit(s) from MnDOT that will be necessary to serve this property. Council Action Needed.- 1. If the Council wishes to proceed with the General Development Plan and Design Modification, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution, with findings, for Council approval. Distribution: 1. City Clerk 2. City Administrator 3. City Attorney 4. Planning Department File 5. Planning Department, GIs Division 6. McGhie & Betts, Inc. 7. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 p.m. on Monday May 7, 2001 in the Council i Board Chambers in the Government Center at 151 4th Street SE. l.r� tl'llrlltitiv%� ✓�� �?,u-c,�-�.� L-LPA `i1XG/wn. IUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: cap SUBDIVISION NWy 74 R SW114 SEC 34-107-14 NORTH LINE NE1/4 SW1/4 SEC 34 O U T L O T T' 0 UTL OT *A' 4TH 1.4"7_ S CRES 0L'TLO T�Dr -4, aLOca 1 � tar 74 L o r , tuu rry I�Ld9e Lor r 2nd STREET N. iV. I j =3 z Z ° ¢ ¢ 1ST ST NW 1ST ST NW SCALE 1 " = 400' FOR WILMAR INVESTMENTS McGhie BettS,lnc. DRAWN BY.'JJJ ROCHESTER SAND & GRAVE �`.ltlm L n. Surw.rara DOTE: 03/14/01 AccT. NO.: 1105/0584 4105 E. RIVER ROAD NE ROCHESTER, MN cons. CADD N0. : 0584ZCE 55906 164 3rE AVE. S.E. R holar, MN. 55904 M7-288-3919 \ all I S 9297 58 I� \ O r 1 a u a NLO ro i ~ ���� � o �p� b -- j r __ I: F• 2 J Oa yz e •O3 994 / moI Ir �0 2 O F- J W U Q Q N /1 \� J N y - $ a _ w p W o N N m O N w z LL m U a 0 G OU mpP N m �I Ozry o I IY NN u K MF� OpV Z7O i Oapp O.O Ow C U OWa LL< p6 KpW WW 0VN1 aKa 0m.I- 2$ 5 0 w6 mKb KNJaNNNJs W aN C WWO O.m WW (NO LLNmdLLNG ZC LLNNo(RLLNmL W Jdi I_UJ oo YaNO4 bW lo Z= _ no 63 Ci mN0. Ul/1 6 .1I1 N --- MINN, MOMMShk ia ao ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPAKI'MENT rN 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, MN 55904-4744 1!■■anA h■■■! �!l�L ollsscS■1 poory, v� tou"TY or TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner DATE: April 5, 2001 RE: General Development Plan #163 for Lot 1, Block1 Hindermann Fitzgerald Subdivision by Willmar Investments. This Plan proposes to develop approximately 1.47 acres of land with multi family residential uses. Petitions to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan and Zoning for the property have also been filed and will be considered concurrent with this application. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Apartments north of 2"d Street NW and west of T.H. 52. Pianninv Department Review. Petitioner: Willmar Investments Rochester Sand & Gravel 4105 E. River Road NE Rochester. MN 55906 Consultant: McGhie & Betts, Inc. 1648 Third Ave. SE Rochester, MN 55904 Location of Property: The property is located north of 2nd St. NW, west of the west Frontage road for T.H. 52 and adjacent to the Quarry Ridge development. Location of Property: The property is located north of 2nd St. NW, west of the west Frontage road for T.H. 52 and adjacent to the Quarry Ridge development. Proposed Use: The applicant requests to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan to designate approximately 1.47 acres of land for "medium density' uses. The property is currently designated for "low density residential" uses. A zoning district amendment and General Development Plan area BUILDING CODE 507/285-B213 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 PLANNING20NING 507/285-8232 • WELL/SEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/287-2275 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Page 2 aQ r General Development Plan April 5, 2001 being considered concurrent with this application. Land Use Plan: The Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan designates this property as suitable for "low density residential" types of development. The applicant has also filed a petition to amend the Land Use Plan to designate this property for "medium density residential" uses and a zoning district amendment to re -zone the property to R-3. Those applications are being considered concurrent with this GDP application. Zoning: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family). An application to re -zone this property to the R-3 District is being considered concurrent with this GDP application. Streets: Access to this property will be to the west Frontage Road of TH 52. The GDP currently shows two accesses. Only one access will be permitted. Sidewalks: Pedestrian facilities will be required adjacent to this development. Drainage: Detailed grading and drainage plans will also be required when the property is platted or developed. Wetlands: It appears as though hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and submitting the information as part of this application. Public Utilities: Services are, or will be, available to serve this property. Parkland Dedication: Parkland dedication requirements for this development will need to be satisfied through a combination of land dedication of 50' corridor along the lake (2.6 acres) and cash in lieu of land. The stormwater ponds on the west and north sides of the development need to be reconfigured such that more of the pond area is located on the development property and less on the park property. Environmental Review: An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not required for this development. Referral Comments: 1. Planning Department —Transportation Div. 2. MnDOT 3. Rochester Public Works 4. John Harford, Wetland LGU a0a, Page 3 General Development Plan April 5, 2001 5. Rochester Park & Recreation 6. Rochester Public Utilities - Water Division 7. Rochester Fire Department Report Attachments: 1. Copy of General Development Plan 2. Referral Comments (7) 3. Proposed General Development Plan Narrative Summary: The applicant is proposing to develop approximately 1.47 acres of land with two lots for multi- family residential dwellings. The GFDP proposes two 15-unit apartment buildings and also identifies two accesses to the site. A temporary access will be provided to the existing frontage road until the TH 52 reconstruction project is completed and this site has direct access to the new frontage road. The GDP will need to be revised to identify only one access to the site, to be shared by the two proposed parcels. Criteria & Staff Suggested Findings: Paragraph 61.215 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual lists the Criteria for approval of a general development plan (see attached section from the newly adopted regulations, which became affective May 15, 1999). Criteria A. The proposed land uses are generally in accord with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and zoning map, or that the means for reconciling any differences have been addressed. A GDP may be processed simultaneously with a rezoning or plan amendment request. A Land Use Plan amendment and Zoning District amendment are being considered concurrent with this GDP. If the amendments are approved, the land uses within the GDP would be consistent with the land use designation and zoning for the property. Criteria B. The proposed development, including its lot sizes, density, access and circulation are compatible with the existing and/or permissible future use of adjacent property. If the Land Use Plan amendment and Zoning District amendment, being considered concurrent with this application, are approved, the density will be consistent with permissible uses of the property. The abutting property to the south is the Quarry Ridge Apartments, currently under construction. That property Is zoned R-3 (Medium Density Residential). Criteria C. The mix of housing is consistent with adopted Land Use and Housing Plans. A Land Use Plan amendment and Zoning District amendment are being considered concurrent with this GDP. if the amendments are approve, the Page 4 0 0 a63 General Development Plan April 5, 2001 land uses and densities within the GDP would be consistent with the land use designation and zoning for the property. The policies and goals found in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan encourage developing a range of densities and development styles. This development will help to further the goals and policies of the Land Use Plan and also those found within Chapter 3 of the Housing Plan. Criteria D. The proposed plan makes provisions for planned capital improvements and streets reflected in the City of Rochester's current 6-Year Capital Improvement Program, adopted Thoroughfare Plan, the ROCOG Long -Range Transportation Plan, Official Maps, and any other public facilities plans adopted by the City. Street system improvements required to accommodate proposed land uses and projected background traffic are compatible with the existing uses and uses shown in the adopted Land Use Plan for the subject and adjacent properties. Please refer to the attached memorandum from the Planning Department Transportation Division dated April 5, 2001 and the memorandum from MnDOT dated April 2, 2001 for the response to this criterion. A temporary access will be provided to the existing frontage road until the TH 52 reconstruction project is completed and this site has direct access to the new frontage road. The GDP will need to be revised to identify only one access to the site, to be shared by the two proposed parcels. Criteria E. On and off -site public facilities are adequate, or will be adequate if the development is phased in, to serve the properties under consideration and will provide access to adjoining land in a manner that will allow development of those adjoining lands in accord with this ordinance. Street system adequacy shall be based on the street system's ability to safely accommodate trips from existing and planned land uses on the existing and proposed street system without creating safety hazards, generating auto stacking that blocks driveways or intersections, or disrupting traffic flow on any street, as identified in the traffic impact report, if required by Section 61.523(C). Capacity from improvements in the first 3 years of the 6-year CIP shall be included in the assessment of adequacy. Please refer to the attached memorandum from the Planning Department Transportation Division dated April 5, 2001 and the memorandum from MnDOT dated April 2, 2001 for the response to this criterion. A temporary access will be provided to the existing frontage road until the TH 52 reconstruction project is completed and this site has direct access to the new frontage road. The GDP will need to be revised to identify only one access to the site, to be shared by the two proposed parcels. �oPage 5 T General Development Plan April 5, 2001 2. Utilities are now available to directly serve the area of the proposed land use, or that the City of Rochester is planning for the extension of utilities to serve the area of the proposed development and such utilities are in the first three years of the City's current 6-Year Capital Improvements Program, or that other arrangements (contractual, development agreement, performance bond, etc.) have been made to ensure that adequate utilities will be available concurrently with development. If needed utilities will not be available concurrent with the proposed development, the applicant for the development approval shall stipulate to a condition that no development will occur and no further development permit will be issued until concurrency has been evidenced. Services are, or will be available to serve this property. 3. The adequacy of other public facilities shall be based on the level of service standards in Section 64.130 and the proposed phasing plan for development. Pedestrian facilities will be required adjacent to this development. Parkland dedication requirements will need to be met via... Criteria F. The drainage, erosion, and construction in the area can be handled through normal engineering and construction practices, or that, at the time of land subdivision, a more detailed investigation of these matters will be provided to solve unusual problems that have been identified. Detailed grading and drainage plans will also be required when the property is platted or developed. Criteria G. The lot, block, and street layout for all development and the lot density for residential development are consistent with the subdivision design standards contained in Section 64.100 and compatible with existing and planned development of adjacent parcels. Two driveway accesses are proposed with this GDP. Only one will be permitted. The Plan will need to be revised to identify one shared access. Recommendation: Staff recommends the following conditions or modifications to assure compliance with the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual and applicable criteria: 1. The General Development Plan shall be revised to provide only one access to the site, which shall be located such that /t will be shared by both of the proposed parcels. 2. Pedestrian facilities are required adjacent to this development. 3. Parkland dedication for this development shall be met via cash in lieu of land. r Page 6 0 General Development Plan April 5, 2001 4. At the time this property is re -platted to subdivide the lot into two lots, the applicant shall provide the City with copies of the access easement and access permit(s) from MnDOT that will be necessary to serve this property. NOTE: Prior to development of this property, Site Development Plans will need to be submitted to the City and approved. This GDP review did not include detailed site plan review for compliance with all regulations applicable to permit issuance (i.e. building setbacks, lighting, recreation space, landscape areas, signage, etc). 1-1 0 J Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE — Suite 100 Rochester, MN 55904-4744 (507)285-8232 MEMORANDUM TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission / City Council FROM: Charles Reiter Senior Transportation Planner DATE: April 5, 2001 RE: Wilmar Investments / West Frontage Rd of TH 52 / Land Use Plan Change and Zoning Amendment The proposed development by Wilmar Investments includes two 15-unit apartment buildings located along the future West Frontage Road of TH 52. According to the requirements of 61.523(.c) of the Land Development Manual, a Land Use Plan amendment involving more than 1 acre of land which has the potential to generate a higher level of traffic than the existing designation is required to prepare of Rezoning Traffic Analysis (RTA). Due to the extensive review of future neighborhood traffic flows that was conducted as part of the review of the Quarry Ridge project, and the incremental nature of additional traffic from the proposed development, the developer was not required to have a RTA completed for this project. In lieu of the RTA, this staff memo will review the traffic system recommendations that were developed as part of the Quarry Ridge review and discuss the added impact this development will create. Multi -family dwelling units are assumed to generate 6.6 trips per unit on a daily basis, with approximately 2/3 of trip per unit in the afternoon peak hour, and slightly over 0.5 trips per unit in the morning peak hour. Using this, we can compare the expected impact from the Quarry Ridge project, for example, and the proposed project: Project Units Daily Traffic PM Traffic AM Traffic (Inbound/Outbound) (Inbound/Outbound) (Inbound/Outbound) Wilmer Investments 30 200 trips 20 17 (10o1 100) (12/8) (5/12) Quarry Ridge 310 2050 trips 200 165 (102511025) (125175) (451120) A critical issue debated extensively during the Quarry Ridge approval process was the expected impact of development on 181h Ave SW/NW, since with the existing one-way southbound West Frontage Road at the 2nd St intersection all inbound traffic must use 181h Ave for a return trip into either of these apartment projects. Outbound traffic, conversely, can use the West Frontage Road, and for the proposed development probably will since the development is arranged to take access solely from the existing and future Frontage Road. During the Quarry Ridge development an assessment of traffic increases on 181h and 19'h Avenue was completed to determine how the resulting traffic would compare to city policy regarding acceptable levels of traffic on different classes of streets. As a general policy, traffic volumes of 1500+/- cars per day on local streets are considered to be consistent with city policy. Figure 1 illustrates the results of this analysis. Given the access layout of Quarry Ridge, traffic was assumed to disperse equally between the east and west driveway. On 18'h Avenue, outbound traffic was assumed to use the frontage road and inbound traffic under current conditions would have to travel north to at least 1" St North before being able to get back to a section of the West Frontage Road that allows two way traffic. After the TH 52 reconstruction is completed, the West Frontage Road will be disconnected from the highway ramp and will be two-way for its entire length, as illustrated in Figure 2. Under these conditions, inbound traffic to either apartment development would be able to access the frontage road off of any street east of 18'h Ave. The proposed Wilmar development will increase traffic on the frontage road by approximately 100 vehicles per day (outbound trips from the proposed development) and will add approximately 100 inbound vehicles per day to 18'h Ave under the current street system layout. Under the current street system, these trips will travel north on 181h Ave to either 151 St or 2nd St North before being able to access the frontage road. The addition of approximately 100 additional vehicles per day on 181h Ave is an incremental increase of approximately 6-10% per day, which is within the range of variability normally associated within daily traffic flow on a street. After the TH 52 reconstruction, 181h Ave between 2nd St SW and 18' St SW and 1s' St SW east of 181h Ave will become part of the frontage road system and apartment residents will be able to access the Frontage Road without having to travel north of 151 St SW. In order to encourage inbound motorists to shift their route to the Frontage Road and off of 18`h Ave as soon as possible, the city and Quarry Ridge developer agreed to the following street system 2 E41 PIA improvements to both slow travel speeds on 18'h Ave immediately and to discourage travel on 18'h Ave after the West Frontage Rd is reconstructed: 1. Installation of a "basket weave" system of stop signs on 18'h and 19'h Ave to discourage travel (this is illustrated is Figure 1 by the placement of the stop signs); 2. Consider the installation of a traffic diverter as shown in Figure 3 at the intersection of 181h Ave with either West Center Street or 151 St South after the TH 52 Reconstruction to direct all inbound traffic towards the new West Frontage Rd. As noted, under the TH 52 reconstruction plan 1st St SW east of 181h Ave will be an integral part of the frontage road. We do not expect a dramatic change in the traffic volume on this street in the future, however, due to the fact that currently there is cut -through traffic coming from the off -ramp of TH 52 that appears to use 1$' St to avoid the existing signal at the West Frontage Rd and 2"d St SW, as well as commercial access traffic using the street to access businesses on the frontage road. As part of the TH 52 reconstruction the ramp will be severed from the frontage road, and the existing businesses will be acquired, thus removing approximately 700- 800 vehicles per day from the neighborhood streets east of 181h Ave. This reduction in traffic will offset to a large degree the additional traffic that will be added by the apartment developments. It should also be noted that a future land use transition will likely occur on the block surrounded by 2n1 St SW, 1s' St SW, the current frontage road and 181h Ave SW. Much of the south half of this block will be acquired as part of the TH 52 project to allow for an adjustment in the grade of the 2nd St bridge over TH 52 (the bridge will rise by about 4 feet) to deal with stormwater management on the mainline of TH 52. Long term, this will create redevelopment on the block between 2"d St SW and 1" St SW east of 18'h Ave, which may very likely affect the residential properties on the north half of the block as well. Thus, the character of the land use along this section of 151 Street is likely to change over time as well due to changes occurring as a result of the TH 52 project. 3 7 w ............. O N r :. y v c N N O a « N La m al c T + + v r N 1�l o N n in ....-1 1 1 N N T O in to N N " -1 " N J r-I Ucn 0 cc ow O O N T T r O co 0 0 V r N t7 7r c 3� m U) �� 6. VN W C)O m CM m c Q c U. W N .x o U) x 0 gP t7 WC) W(f QU.W N W 1 i-W J r N m and Ll186 8 8 CV) cn ON %o ti rl rl I 1 1 any L1161 Ln %0 %0 1 I 1 .r N KJ N % a c N ^ Site G(' C J O �f`n� O� p Cam' s: : I O O I p +'--_`_.I s S n1 I i . i., O O c110 m p 1 -1 • 1"StNW r .. 4 C' V I I: n=r _ U _---1 I I a O K :• O Vo ©LU LL La C O n ry V O ).Loo �� 10 Q% k.sW_ Vcn I i F° °' I_,f Il I i_J 1° j LL11� Fes- < West Center St i ill 1 LL- cif ar .—..t�; ef�nP �p °cJ• O .�-' „1 ( III 3 ,d •!. t ryJ CV I .n 1"StSW I I r II I �. r r rt _ r I I. 1 !' A 410 1 'j llcz nd 2 1 1 I .1 "T. rl�- 2 SC SW -. r'-6T I . ac4�?-%%f-f .o s i v 3iaaanai mverte al4'�- 0g4NESOT O 9 M C a OF April 2, 2001 Jennifer Gayness Minnesota Department of Transportation District 6 2900-48th St. N.W. Box 6177 Rochester, Minnesota 55903-6177 Rochester Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE — Suite 100 Rochester, MN 55904 (507) 280-2913 Subject: Land Use Plan Amendment #01-02 and Zoning District Amendment #01-05 by Wilmar Investments to amend the land use designation from "low density residential" to "medium density residential" and to amend the zoning district from R-1 (Mixed Single Family) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on approximately 1.47 acres of land. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Apartments north of 2nd Street NW and west of TH 52. General Development Plan #163 for Lot 1, Block 1 Hindermann Fitzgerald Subdivision by Willmar Investments. The Plan proposes to develop approximately 1.47 acres of land with multi family residential uses. Petitions to amend the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan and Zoning for the property have also been filed and will be considered concurrent with this application. The property is located north of the Quarry Ridge Apartments north of 2nd Street NW and west of TH 52. C.S. # 5510 Dear Ms. Gayness: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above proposal. It is Mn/DOT's understanding this proposal is requesting two entrances using the existing Mn/DOT frontage road on the west side of TH 52 north of Second Street NW. Mn/DOT has the following recommendations and prerequisites: • There will be no access permit granted until the current lease terminates April 1, 2001. Please contact Lisa Beckman, from our Right of Way Department, at 529-2759 if you have any questions regarding this lease. It is Mn/DOT's recommendation that one access driveway be used. This driveway will be a shared entrance for the proposed parcels "A" and `B". The construction of this driveway will be at the developer's expense and must meet Mn/DOT's standards. Upon completion of the new frontage road as part of the T.H. 52/14 interchange project, a new connection will be constructed at the the developer's expense and must meet Mn/DOT's standards. No compensation will be awarded for this new connection. An Equal Opportunity Employer c2l3 Jennifer Gayness April 2, 2001 Page Two Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. If you have any questions please contact Fred Sandal, Principal Planner, at 285-7369 or Debbie Persoon-Bement, Plan and Plat Coordinator, at 281-7777. Sincerely, Dale E. Maul Planning Director a'y ROCHESTER Minnesota TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Michael J. Nigbur DATE: 3127/01 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4h Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507-287-7800 FAX — 507-281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for General Development Plan #163 on the Willmar Investments (Lot 4, Block 1. Hindermann Fitzeerald Subdivision) property. The following are Public Works comments on the �rbposal:' 1. A Grading & Drainage Plan was approved for this property at the time it was platted. Stormwater Management will be provided by the detention pond planned for this subdivision. 2. A Development Agreement Lab been executed for this property 3. A final plat will be required to split this lot. Prior to Final Plat approval the owner should provide a copy of the access easement(s), for the proposed access locations to the existing frontage road. 4. If the extension of public sanitary sewer, stormsewer, and or addition of hydrant(s) and watermain is required for this development, the execution of a City -Owner Contract will be required. 5. The Owner should provide a bike storage facility. Charges/fees applicable to the development of this property will be addressed in the Development Agreement, and include: Sanitary Sewer Availability (SAC) @ $1653.67 per developable acre Watei Availability C1iazge'(WAC) @ $1653.67 per developable acre Substandard Street Reconstruction Charge @ $30.90 per foot of frontage along the existing Frontage Road. •e Contribution for Pedestrian Facility along the Frontage Road @ $10.00 per foot of frontage. Since thi z property will be develnning !nsidential, vs. the original proposed commercial use, a Park Land Dedication fee will apply. CMempkG0P163 Hindennann Fitzgerald L4 B1.doc #ROCHESTER PARK AND R REATION DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM ajs DATE: March 22, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness Planning FROM: Denny Stotz SUBJECT: General Development Plan #163 Lot 1 Block 1 Hinderman Fitzgerald Subdivision Parkland dedication for the development to be in the form of cash in lieu of land. Applicant: Willmar Investments 4105 East River Rochester Mn N:\PARK\DSTOTZ\2001\DEDICATION\NW 2898\FITZ GDP 163 .DOC �l� t pOCHE�TEI1. LI11,1'f ALL-AMWCA CrrY ROCHESTER `..1` �iizr�e�ata DAVID A. KAPLER, Chief Rochester Fire Department 201 4th Street SE, Room 10 Rochester, MN 55904-3726 (507)285-8072 FAX #(507) 285-8256 DATE: March 29, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness, Planning FROM: Lyle Felsch, Deputy Chief SUBJECT: General Development Plan #163 and Land Use Plan Amend. #01-02 (as revised 3/27/01), by Willmar Investments located north of Quarry Ridge Apartments, north of 2nd St. NW and west of TH 52. With regard to the above noted General Development Plan and Land Use Plan Amendment, the fire department has the following requirements: 1. An adequate water supply shall be provided for fire protection including hydrants properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water Division. Hydrants shall be in place prior to commencing building construction. 2. Fire department, access streets and roadways shall be as provided in accordance with the fire code, RCO 31 and the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. All fire department access roadways shall be serviceable prior to and during building construction. All buildings are required to display the proper street address number on the building front, which is plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Number size must be a minimum 4" high on contrasting background when located on the building and 3" high if located on a rural mail box at the public road fronting the property. Reflective numbers are recommended. c: Donn Richardson, RPU, Water Division Willmar Investments c/o Rochester Sand & Gravel, 4105 E. River Rd NE, Rochester, MN 55906 McGhie & Betts, 1648 3`d Ave. SE, Rochester, MN 55904 we pledge, we deliver March 21, 2001 Rochester -Olmsted CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904-7996 REFERENCE: Land Use Plan Amendment #01-02 and Zoning District Amendment #01-05 by Willmar Investments to amend the land use plan designation from low density residential to medium density residential and the zoning district from R-1 to R-3 on 1.47 acres of land north of Quarry Ridge Apartments NW. Dear Ms. Gamess: Our review of the referenced land use plan amendment is complete and our comments follow: 1. Preliminary water system computer modeling indicates adequate flow for fire protection will be available to this property for this use. 2. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout to serve this area. Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions. Very truly yours, 0644A RjWL Donn Richardson Water C: Doug Rovang, RPU Mike Engle, RPU Mark Baker, City Public Works Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention Willmar Investments McGhie & Betts, Inc. Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River,Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813 telephone 507-280-1540 . facsimile 507-280-1542 WETLAND COMMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Application Number: (11>2 "--I (PS y AW-02 3L— �ew No hydric soils exist on the site based on the Soil Survey J.Xydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and submitting the information as part of this application. A wetland delineation has been carried out for the property and is on file with the Planning Department A wetland delineation is on file with the Planning Department and a No - loss, Exemption, or Replacement Plan has been submitted to the Planning Department. A wetland related application has been approved by the City. This plan incorporates the approved wetland plan. No hydric soils exist on the property based on the Soil Survey. However, due to the location in the landscape the property owner should examine the site for wetlands. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands. Other or Explanation From John Harford Wetlands LGU Representative General Development Plan for Wilmar Investments in Lot 4, Block 1, 11indermann Fitzgerald Subdivision Rochester, Minnesota Prepared for: Wilmar Investments, % Rochester Sand & Gravel 4105 East River Road NE Rochester, Minnesota 55906 I Prepared by: McGhie & Betts, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Planners 1648 Third Avenue SE Rochester, MN 55904 March 13, 2001 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B, Item E of the Informational Supplement to the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual as adopted by the City of Rochester on January 8, 1992, amended December 27, 1999, and the Appendix update of November 20, 1995. A General Development Plan (GDP) is a document, which, through the combined use of site, grading, utility, and landscape plans, and written materials, will serve as a guide to the future development of a site. A GDP establishes street access, lot pattern, drainage controls, utility service, and land use for the property under consideration with the GDP. A GDP is processed through the Type III Review procedure under a Phase III hearing process. A presentation will be made at the Planning and Zoning Commission review meeting and at the public hearing before the Common Council. A General Development Plan (GDP) is required for this site in accordance with Section 61.211 for up zoning to the R-3 Zone. The proposed use for this site is two 15 (fifteen) unit apartment complexes that will be built in two phases. The current land use is medium density residential and the proposed R-3 zoning is appropriate for the land use. The property was platted in June of 2000 and is currently zoned R-1 at that time. ' 2.0 BACKGROUND This site is adjacent to the Quarry Ridge Apartments and will get some utility service from that development. This site was included in the conditional use permit that was completed for the Quarry ' Ridge development and pond excavation. A GDP is required for the up zoning from R-1 to R-3. A Meeting was held with Ms. Mitzi Baker and Mr. Brent Svenby of the Consolidated Planning Department to discuss any issues that they felt may ' pose any concerns. Discussions with Mr. Charles Reiter, Transportation Planner, addressing traffic concerns did not bring about any issues. General Development Plan for wiltnar Investments Page 1 • 1 doll 3.0 SITE ANALYSIS 3.01 Access The property is located adjacent to the Quarry Ridge Apartments and the proposed frontage road on the west side of Highway 52 & north of 2nd Street NW. The GDP shows two access drives into the site serving the two proposed apartment complexes on a temporary basis. These drives will be connected to the existing frontage road until the time of which they will be able to use the proposed frontage road. 3.02 Wetlands A wetland exemption was granted for the entire Hinderman/Fitzgerald Subdivision. 3.03 Floodplain The FEMA Maps prepared in February of 1998, delineate the 100-year flood limits across the southeast corner of the site. This line is identified on the GDP. 4.0 PROPOSED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4.01 Project Description and Scope The attached General Development Plan /Site Plan shows the property split into two parcels with one-15 (fifteen) unit apartment complex on each parcel. General Development Plan for Wilmar Investments Pa°e 2 There will be access to both parcels from the proposed MnDOT frontage road. Temporary access will be granted across the former Prow property (now owned by MnDOT) by MnDOT until construction of the new frontage road is completed. 4.02 Response to Section 3a — 3f of Section E of Appendix. The following items are addressed as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. 3. a Topographic or soils conditions which, in the estimation of the applicant, may create potential problems in street, drainage, public utilities or building design and construction, and how these problems will be investigated further or engineered to overcome the limitations: There are no known soil conditions that will create problems with street, drainage, and building construction. Soil borings will need to be completed to make specific recommendations for footing and foundation systems. The topography is such that normal grading practices can be followed to prepare building sites. 3. b. Storm drainage problems which, in the estimation of the applicant, may result in costs that will exceed normal storm drainage costs. Surface storm water control can be handled with surface runoff into the detention pond on the west side of the site. 3. c. Identification of potential off -site drainage problems. We do not anticipate any off -site drainage problems. 3. d. Availability of utilities to serve the area under consideration. General Development Plan for Wilmar Investments Page 3 Sanitary sewer will be accessed from the trunk main sewer currently serving Country Club Manor to the north and west. Water will be accessed from the Iwatermain stub from the Quarry Ridge Development. ' 3. a Identification of possible erosion problems which may arise in the estimation of the applicant. No erosion problems are anticipated for this development. 3 f. A general statement as to the possible phasing of any development activity to occur on the property under the control of the applicant. Phasing of the development will take place in two phases, which is why the parcel is being subdivided. General Development Plan for Wilmar Investments Page 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 04P r DATE: 05-07-01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. PT TBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING 9 _0 A DESCRIPTION: Annexation by Ordinance Petition #01-07 by Caryl Ripley to annex PREPARED BY: approximately 59.97 acres of land located west of 50�h Avenue NW, south of 651h Street NW Theresa Fogarty, and north of the Douglas Trail. Planner May 3, 2001 City Planning and Zoninq Commission Recommendation: The City Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this annexation request on April 25, 2001. The Commission found that this property is adjacent to the city limits and can be served by City services. The Planning Commission therefore recommends approval of this request. Ms. Wiesner moved to recommend approval of Annexation Petition #01-07 by Caryl Ripley. Mr. Burke seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0, with Ms. Rivas abstaining. Planning Department Recommendation: See attached staff report, dated April 19, 2001. Minnesota Statutes now specify that the property taxes payable in the year an annexation is effective shall be paid to the Township. For the five years following the annexation, the City must make a cash payment to the Township equaling 90%, 70%, 50%, 30% and 10% of the Townships share of the taxes in the year the property was annexed. The Township Taxes on this property for 2000 is $45.49. Council Action Needed: 1. Following the public hearing, if the Council wishes to proceed as petitioned, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to be adopted and transmitted to the MN Planning /Office of Strategic and Long Range Planning. Attachments 1. Staff report, dated April 19, 2001. 2. Draft Minutes of the April 25, 2001 CPZC meeting Distribution: 1. City Administrator 2. City Clerk Q 3. City Attorney: Legal Description Attached rr r✓'� 4. City Finance Director: Tax Information Attached ��✓ 5. Planning Department File 6. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2001 in the Council Chambers at the Rochester I Olmsted County Government Center. 7. McGhie & Betts, Inc. i.,JUNCILACTION: Motlonby: second by: to: to 65TH ST LN I RO....:STER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPAn.'MENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, MN 55904-4744 COUNrr of TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Theresa Fogarty, Planner .1-;Z' DATE: April 19, 2001 RE: Annexation Petition #01-07 by Call Ripley to annex approximately 59.97 acres of land located west of 501 Avenue NW, south of 651h Street NW and north of the Douglas Trail. P►anningDepartment Review: Applicants/Owners: Caryl Ripley 27459 637 Street Kasson, MN 55944 Location of Property: The property is located west of 501h Avenue NW, south of 651h Street NW and north of the Douglas Trail. Existing Land Use: This property is currently undeveloped land. Size: The property proposed for annexation is approximately 59.97 acres of unplatted land. Existing Zoning: The property is zoned A-3 (Agricultural) District on the Olmsted County zoning map. Future Zoning: Upon annexation, the property will be zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family Residential) district on the Rochester zoning map. Land Use Plan: This property is designated for "low density residential' uses on the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. Adjacency to the Municipal The property is adjacent to the city limits along its southern Limits: and eastern boundaries. Sewer & Water: The Northwest High Level Water System service will be available to this property, with the completion of Ridgeview Manor Subdivision. Sanitary sewer and water is available, but will need to be extended to serve this property. BUILDING CODE 507/285-8213 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 .nwnwea PLANNING/ZONING 507/285-8232 • WELL/SEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/287-2275 .w AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER RigPage 2 Annexation #01-07 Ripley April 19, 2001 Utilities: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.033 (subd. 13), a municipality must notify a petitioner that the cost of electric utility service may change if the land is annexed to the municipality. A notice has been provided to the applicant. Townboard Review: Minnesota State Statutes require that the Townboard members receive a written notice, by certified mail, 30 days prior to the public hearing. The City Council will hold a public hearing on this item on May 7, 2001. The City Clerk has sent the certified 30 day notice. Referral Comments: 1. Rochester Public Utilities - Water Division 2. Rochester Fire Department 3. Rochester Public Utilities - Operations Division 4. Rochester Public Works Department Report Attachments: 1. Annexation Map I Location Map 2. Referral Comments (4 letters) Staff Recommendation: This property is adjacent to the City limits and can be served by city services upon extension of the sanitary sewer and water lines from their present ends. The Planning staff recommends that the City proceed to adopt an ordinance annexing the property according to Minnesota Statutes 414.033, Subdivision 2(3). aay. we pledge, we deliver April 4, 2001 Rochester -Olmsted CONSOLIDATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904-7996 REFERENCE: Annexation #01-07 by Caryl Ripley to annex 59.97 acres of land located west of Ridgeview Manor. Dear Ms. Gayness: Our review of the referenced petition is complete and our comments follow: 1. The property may be subject to the water availability fee, connection fees or assessments. The Land Development Manager (507-281-6198) at the Public Works Department determines the applicability of these fees. 2. Northwest High Level Water System service will be available to this property with the completion of Ridgeview Manor. 3. We will work with the applicant's engineering firm to develop the necessary water system layout to serve this area. Please contact us at 507-280-1600 if you have questions. Very truly yours, 06-JA R Donn Richardson Water C: Doug Rovang, RPU Mike Engle, RPU Mark Baker, City Public Works Vance Swisher, Fire Prevention BBB Development, LLC McGhie & Betts, Inc. Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, Minnesota 55906-2813 telephone 507-280-1540 facsimile 507-280-1542 a� C}tF STf R.allq\, ACIG CITY t. ems. •.. . rAAXRI R4CHESTER°T. `` • '%! ••-� ./�ircr�e�a�a DAVID A. KAPLER, Chief Rochester Fire Department 201 4th Street SE, Room 10 Rochester, MN 55904-3726 (507)265-8072 FAX #(507)285-8256 DATE: April 13, 2001 TO: Jennifer Garness, Planning FROM: Lyle Felsch, Deputy Chief SUBJECT: Annexation #01-07 by Caryl Ripley to annex 59.57 acres of land located west of 50th Ave, NW, south of 65th St. NW and north of the Douglas Trail. With regard to the above noted annexation, the fire department has no objections the following requirements: 1. An adequate water supply must be provided for fire protection of buildings subsequently built on this property, including hydrants properly located and installed in accordance with the specifications of the Water Division. Hydrants shall be in place prior to commencing building construction. 2. All buildings constructed on this property must be provided with adequate access streets and roadways as provided in accordance with the fire code, RCO 31 and the Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual including approved cul-de-sac dimensions and street widths. All fire department access roadways shall be serviceable prior to and during building construction. c: Donn Richardson, RPU, Water Division BBB Development, 27549 637th Street, Kasson, MN 55944 McGhie & Betts, 1648 3rd Ave SE, Rochester, MN 55904 F rpu uye rfedje, we defiver 507/280-1579 March 22, 2001 TO: Jennifer Gamess, Planning Department Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department FROM: Michael J. Engle, Supv. Of Distribution Design Rochester Public Utilities a 3/ ' SUBJECT: Annexation #01-07 by Caryl Ripley to annex approximately 59.97 acres of land located west of 50 Avenue NW, south of 65 Street NW, and north of the Douglas Trail. RPU's Operations Division has reviewed this annexation and has no objection as it is outside our service area at this time. However, we do intend to serve the total area in the future. Sincerely, Michael J. Engle / c W. Lorber Rochester Public Utilities, 4000 East River Road NE, Rochester, MN 55906-2813 telephone 507.280.1540 facsimile 507.280.1542 website www.rpu.org R- RocxESTEx Minnesota TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Michael J. Nigbur Date: 3123/01 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4m Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507-287-7800 FAX — 507-281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the requested application for Annexation #01-07 on the Caryl Ripley (p/o Ridgeview, Manor GDP#144) property. The following are Public Works comments on the proposal: This property can be served with municipal sewer & water. C:\tempWNNX01-07 Caryl Ripley Ridgeview Manor Property.doc 933 Draft Minutes of the City Planning & Zoning Commission Date of Meeting: April 25, 2001 Ms. Rivas explained that she would need to abstain from voting. Ms. Mitzi Baker presented the staff report, dated April 19, 2001, to the Commission. The staff report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department. Ms. Wiesner moved to recommend approval of Annexation #01-07 by Caryl Ripley. Mr. Burke seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0, with Ms. Rivas abstaining. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING a3s / DATE: 5/7101 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT! ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Works S -11f ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Hearing: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the PREPARED BY:h J(. Thomas Subdivision Area, J9788 J. Loehr This is Hearing to consider the following local improvement project: Project No. M1-27, J9788 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve the Thomas Subdivision Area." The estimated construction costs and expense of this project are as follows: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $ 363,505 Service Connections 45,000 Sub -Total $ 408,505 Engineering/Interest/Contingencies 122,551 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 531,056 The Thomas Subdivision sanitary sewer and watermain extension project is included in the 2001 Capital Budget and is tentatively scheduled for construction in 2002. The Thomas Subdivision Area is currently outside the City limits. An Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and Marion Township is finalized. Annexation of the Thomas Subdivision Area will occur no earlier than January 1 of the year 5-years after public sanitary sewer and watermain project is substantially completed to serve the area. The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements) and Sales Tax revenue appropriated to the Water Quality Protection Program for rate caps and per lot caps. The WQPP Project Manager, the Assistant City Administrator and members of the Marion Town Board conducted an informational meeting for the Thomas Subdivision Area property owners on February 22, 2001. This meeting was held to review the Water Quality Protection Program and respond to any questions that the property owners had regarding the WQPP. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted ordering the project to be made. Since the Thomas Subdivision area was petitioned by greater than 50% of the owners of property affected by the project, a simple majority vote of the Council is required for adoption. C Attachments: Feasibility Report I, Location Map po�' cuUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: aa(p REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO SERVE THE THOMAS SUBDIVISION AREA. March 20, 2000 Honorable Mayor & Common Council City of Rochester, Minnesota A petition for sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the Thomas Subdivision Area was forwarded by the City Council at their meeting of May 17, 1999 to the Public Works Department for the preparation of a Feasibility Report. The petition was checked and found to be in proper form and was signed by 22 of 33 property owners of lots containing a single-family residential dwelling. This represents 66.7 percent of the single-family residential lots within the Thomas Subdivision Area that are eligible to participate in the City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program adopted by the City Council on December 21, 1999. The Thomas Subdivision Area also includes 6 undeveloped single-family residential lots. Feasibility Report We report that the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The location of this project is within an area of existing single-family residential development and existing commercial development that currently lacks public sanitary sewer and watermain. A majority of the septic systems and wells within the Area were constructed prior to the State of Minnesota and Olmsted County having any requirements or standards for construction of septic systems and wells. The lots are typically under Yz acre in size and are unable to absorb the nitrates created from the septic systems. There is an increasing threat of contamination to the City of Rochester's ground water supply as the existing septic systems and wells begin to fail. This project would allow property owners of lots containing existing single-family residential dwellings and developed commercial lots to connect to public sanitary sewer and water systems rather than replacing their old systems when they fail. This project also allows the undeveloped single-family residential lots to develop with public sewer and watermain The costs of this project are proposed to be recovered through sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements), sales tax revenue appropriated to the City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program for existing single-family residential development. The proposed project consists of the installation of an 8-inch sanitary sewer lines, 8-inch watermain lines, and sanitary sewer and water service connections throughout the Thomas Subdivision Area. Public sanitary sewer will be available at the west edge of the Thomas Subdivision Area after the Badger Run Trunkline sanitary sewer is constructed in late 2001 and/or early 2002. Sanitary sewer will be extended from that location to serve Thomas Subdivision Area. Watermain is currently available at the intersection of 30th Avenue SE and Marion Road SE. Trunk watermain will be extended from that location to serve the Thomas Subdivision Area and other subdivisions in Marion Township that are located between 30th Avenue and the Thomas Subdivision Area that have requested the extension of public sanitary sewer and watermain through the City of Rochester Water Quality Protection Program Area. a3� Applicable Connection Charge Rates and per Lot Caps Since the Thomas Subdivision Area petition was received prior to August 1, 1999, the date that the Water Quality Protection Program rates and per lot caps were adjusted by the change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index as measured in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area during the preceding calendar year, the Department of Public Works recommends that the sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges for this project be based on the connection charge rates and per lot caps in affect at the time the petition was received by the City as follows: • Maximum sanitary sewer and water connection charge rate of $66.30 per foot of frontage. • Maximum sewer and water connection charge per lot cap for a developed lot that contains a habitable single family dwelling unit shall be as follows: 1) maximum $8,160 per lot for any developed lot 1/2 acre or less. 2) $8,160 per lot, plus $0.19 per square foot for any developed lot greater than %a acre up to 1-1/2 acre. 3) maximum $16,320 per lot for any developed lot 1-1/2 acre or larger. The estimated construction costs and expenses of the project made without completed plans or survey are as follows: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Sewer Service Connection Stub -Outs $750 per service x 39 services Water Service Connection Stub -out $750 per service x 39 services Estimated Cost of the Project The estimated proiect costs are proposed to be funded as follows: Utility Connection Agreements Sales Tax Revenue (see below) Estimated Project Costs Amount of sales tax revenue required for the Project Sales Tax (Rate Cap and per Lot Cap) Sales Tax (Sewer Service Stub -Out Allowances) 33 services x $750/serv. Sales Tax (Water Service Stub -Out Allowances)33 services x $750/serv. Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Funding Required for Construction of Project $ 472,556 $ 29,250 $ 29.250 $ 531,056 $ 318,155 $ 212,901 $ 531,056 $ 163,401 $ 24,750 $ 24,750 $ 212,901 MI(I Estimated additional sales tax revenue required for work on private property Of the 39 lots within the project area 33 lots contain a single-family residential dwelling. These lots are eligible for Allowances through the Water Quality Protection Program as follows: Sewer Service Lateral 33 lots x $1,000 per lot $ 33,000 Water Service Lateral 33 lots x $1,000 per lot $ 33,000 Well Closure 33 lots x $1,100 per lot $ 33,000 Septic Closure 33 lots x $ 500 per lot $ 16,500 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances for Work on $ 115,500 Private Property Estimated sales tax revenue required for construction of Project and Allowances Estimated Amount Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of the Project $ 212,901 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances $ 115,500 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Construction of the $ 323,401 Project and Allowances for Work on Private Property We recommend that the necessary funding to construct sanitary sewer, watermain and service connections in the Thomas Subdivision Area be done so in accordance with the City of Rochester's existing sanitary sewer and watermain connection charge policies and the Water Quality Protection Program. Property owners that desire to participate in the Water Quality Protection Program and the benefits contained therein, are required to: 1. Enter into a Utility Connection Agreement with the City within three (3) years of the date the City initiates the project. 2. Connect the existing single-family residential dwelling or existing developed commercial property to the public sewer and water systems within five (5) years of the date of project initiation. 3. Consent to annexation of their property consistent with the conditions of an Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and Rochester Township, or to the City initiated annexation of the Area as is currently proposed by the City. Submitted for your consideration: Project ity Protection Program aa9 BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Project No: M1-27 Date (Orig.) 03/20/2001 J No: 9788 Description: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Extension to Serve the Thomas Subdivision Area Project Contract Final Budget Cost Cost Construction Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Service Connections Engineering/Interest/Contingency Total Construction & Expense Cost Distribution Anticipated Utility Connection Agreements Sales Tax Funding TOTAL Make Initial Disbursement fromP. I. R. Fund $ 363,505 45.000 1 $ 318,155 212,901 $ 531,056 \ Badger Run Trun0ne Sewer Thomas Court Area North of Line Welch Court Area South of Line Lots Served by Sewer & Water Services Placed Under Marion Road Sanitary Sewer & Waten-nain i L'VI /IQllv,v Ir tai �Ks. Y/2-0)61 "t�. cam- c,���� & � Lj- lc�a G� -22 Al f 11 l ,�� REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 75 VV3 10 s!7/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING ❑EPT! ITEM NO, PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Works e - 102 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Hearing: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to Serve the PREPARED BY: Welch Subdivision Area, J9789 J. Loehr This is a Hearing to consider the following local improvement project: Project No. M1-28, J9789 "Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Extension to Serve the Welch Subdivision Area." The estimated construction costs and expense of this project are as follows: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain $ 302,107 Service Connections 26,538 Sub -Total $ 328,645 Engineering/Interest/Contingencies 98,594 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 427,239 The Welch Subdivision sanitary sewer and watermain extension project is included in the 2001 Capital Budget and is tentatively scheduled for construction in 2002. The Welch Subdivision Area is currently outside the City limits. An Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and Marion Township is finalized. Annexation of the Welch Subdivision Area will occur no earlier than January 1 of the year 5-years after public sanitary sewer and watermain project is substantially completed to serve the area. The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements) and Sales Tax revenue appropriated to the Water Quality Protection Program for rate caps and per lot caps. The WQPP Project Manager, the Assistant City Administrator and members of the Marion Town Board conducted an informational meeting for the Welch Subdivision Area property owners on February 22, 2001. This meeting was held to review the Water Quality Protection Program and respond to any questions that the property owners had regarding the WQPP. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted ordering the project to be made. Since the project was petitioned by less than 50% of the owners of property affected by the project a 6/7ths vote of the Council is required for adoption. Attachments: Feasibility Report Location Map wUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO SERVE THE WELCH SUBDIVISION AREA. March 20, 2000 Honorable Mayor & Common Council City of Rochester, Minnesota A petition for sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the Welch Subdivision Area was forwarded by the City Council at their meeting of May 17, 1999 to the Public Works Department for the preparation of a Feasibility Report. The petition was checked and found to be in proper form and was signed by 7 of 15 property owners of lots containing a single-family residential dwelling. This represents 46.7 percent of the single-family residential lots within the Welch Subdivision Area that are eligible to participate in the City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program adopted by the City Council on December 21, 1999. The Welch Subdivision Area also includes 3 developed commercial properties and 5 undeveloped single-family residential lots. Feasibility Reoort We report that the above referenced project is feasible and recommend its construction. The location of this project is within an area of existing single-family residential development and existing commercial development that currently lacks public sanitary sewer and watermain. A majority of the septic systems and wells within the Area were constructed prior to the State of Minnesota and Olmsted County having any requirements or standards for construction of septic systems and wells. The lots are typically under %: acre in size and are unable to absorb the nitrates created from the septic systems. There is an increasing threat of contamination to the City of Rochester's ground water supply as the existing septic systems and wells begin to fail. This project would allow property owners of lots containing existing single-family residential dwellings and developed commercial lots to connect to public sanitary sewer and water systems rather than replacing their old systems when they fail. This project also allows the undeveloped single-family residential lots to develop with public sewer and watermain The costs of this project are proposed to be recovered through sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements), sales tax revenue appropriated to the City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program for existing single-family residential development and developed commercial property. The proposed project consists of the installation of an 8-inch sanitary sewer lines, 8-inch watermain lines, and sanitary sewer and water service connections throughout the Welch Subdivision Area. Public sanitary sewer will be available at the west edge of the Welch Subdivision Area after the Badger Run Trunkline sanitary sewer is constructed in late 2001 and/or early 2002, and sanitary sewer is constructed to serve the Thomas Subdivision Area located north of the Welch Subdivision Area. Watermain is currently available at the intersection of 30th Avenue SE and Marion Road SE. Trunk watermain will be extended from that location to serve the Welch Subdivision Area and other subdivisions in Marion Township that are located between 30tb Avenue and the Welch Subdivision Area that have requested the extension of public sanitary sewer and watermain through the City of Rochester Water Quality Protection Program Area. aqs 11 Applicable Connection Charge Rates and per Lot Caps Since the Welch Subdivision Area petition was received prior to August 1, 1999, the date that the Water Quality Protection Program rates and per lot caps were adjusted by the change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index as measured in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area during the preceding calendar year, the Department of Public Works recommends that the sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges for this project be based on the connection charge rates and per lot caps in affect at the time the petition was received by the City as follows: • Maximum sanitary sewer and water connection charge rate of $66.30 per foot of frontage. • Maximum sewer and water connection charge per lot cap for a developed lot that contains a habitable single family dwelling unit shall be as follows: 1) maximum $8,160 per lot for any developed lot 1/2 acre or less. 2) $8,160 per lot, plus $0.19 per square foot for any developed lot greater than '/2 acre up to 1-1/2 acre. 3) maximum $16,320 per lot for any developed lot 1-1/2 acre or larger. The estimated construction costs and expenses of the project made without completed plans or survey are as follows: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Sewer Service Connection Stub -Outs $750 per service x 23 services Water Service Connection Stub -out $750 per service x 23 services Estimated Cost of the Project The estimated project costs are proposed to be funded as follows: Utility Connection Agreements Sales Tax Revenue (see below) Estimated Project Costs Amount of sales tax revenue required for the Project Sales Tax (Rate Cap and per Lot Cap) Sales Tax (Sewer Service Stub -Out Allowances) 18 services x $750/serv. Sales Tax (Water Service Stub -Out Allowances) 18 services x $750/serv. Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Funding Required for Construction of Project $ 392,739 $ 17,250 $ 17,250 $ 427,239 $ 236,356 $ 190,883 $ 427,239 $ 163,883 $ 13,500 $ 13,500 $ 190,883 aq e Estimated additional sales tax revenue required for work on private property Of the 21 lots within the project area 15 lots contain a single-family residential dwelling and 3 lots are developed commercial properties. These lots are eligible for Allowances through the Water Quality Protection Program as follows: Sewer Service Lateral 18 lots x $1,000 per lot $ 18,000 Water Service Lateral 18 lots x $1,000 per lot $ 18,000 Well Closure 18 lots x $1,100 per lot $ 18,000 Septic Closure 18 lots x $ 500 per lot $ 9,000 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances for Work on $ 63,000 Private Property Estimated sales tax revenue required for construction of Project and Allowances Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of the Project $ 190,883 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances $ 63,000 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Construction of the $ 253,883 Project and Allowances for Work on Private Property We recommend that the necessary funding to construct sanitary sewer, watermain and service connections in the Welch Subdivision Area be done so in accordance with the City of Rochester's existing sanitary sewer and watermain connection charge policies and the Water Quality Protection Program. Property owners that desire to participate in the Water Quality Protection Program and the benefits contained therein, are required to: 1. Enter into a Utility Connection Agreement with the City within three (3) years of the date the City initiates the project. 2. Connect the existing single-family residential dwelling or existing developed commercial property to the public sewer and water systems within five (5) years of the date of project initiation. 3. Consent to annexation of their property consistent with the conditions of an Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and Rochester Township, or to the City initiated annexation of the Area as is currently proposed by the City. Submitted for your consideration: Im '4ality Protection Program Manager aqq BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Project No: M1-28 J No: 9789 Date (Orig.) 03/20/2001 Description: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Extension to Serve the Welch Subdivision Area Project Contract Final Budget Cost Cost Construction Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Service Connections Engineerinonterest/Contineency Total Construction & Expense Cost Distribution 3 98,594 $ 427,239 Anticipated Utility Connection Agreements $ 236,356 Sales Tax Funding 190,883 TOTAL Make Initial Disbursement fromP. I. R. Fund $ 427,239 a1$ FBadger Run T`unkiine Sewer Thomas Court Area North of Line Welch Court Area South of line Lots Served by Sewer & Water Services Placed Under Marion Road Sanitary Sewer & Watermain REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7 01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING nEPT: ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Works fCi'f 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Public Hearing: Sanitary Sewer and Public Improvements to PREPARED BY: Serve Rose Harbor Sub. Area, J9749 J. Loehr { This is Hearing to consider the following local improvement project: Proiect No. M1-05. J9749 "Sanitary Sewer Extension to Serve the Rose Harbor Subdivision Area and Public Improvements to Serve Undeveloped Property Located in the Rose Harbor Subdivision Area." The estimated construction costs and expense of this project are as follows: WQPP Project Area $1,364,290 Western Walls Petition Area 474,665 Sub -Total $1,838,955 Engineering/Interest/Contingencies 551,687 Total Estimated Project Cost $2,390,642 The Rose Harbor Subdivision WQPP Project Area sanitary sewer extension project is included in the 2001 Capital Budget, The Western Walls Petition Area is not included in the 2001 Capital Budget. However, the Department of Public Works recommends that the WQPP project and the Western Walls petition public improvement project be combined as one project. The Rose Harbor Area is currently outside the City limits. An Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and Marion Township is finalized. Annexation of the WQPP project area will occur no earlier than January 1 of the year 5-years after public sanitary sewer project is substantially completed to serve the area. The project is proposed to be funded from sewer and water connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements), Rochester Public Utility for watermain replacement and oversized watermain, special assessments to lots within the Western Walls petition area, Sales Tax supported Water Availability Charges for trunk watermain costs, and Sales Tax revenue appropriated to the Water Quality Protection Program for rate caps and per lot caps. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted ordering the project to be made. Since the Rose Harbor WQPP project area was petitioned by greater than 50% of the owners of developed property affected by the project, and since the Western Walls petition area represents greater than 50% of the properties affected by the project, a simple majority vote of the Council is required for adoption. Attachments: Feasibility Report L� Location Map COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: a� REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF PROPOSED LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TO SERVE ROSE HARBOR SUBDIVISION AREA. March 20, 2001 Honorable Mayor & Common Council City of Rochester, Minnesota Water Quality Protection Program Petition A petition for sanitary sewer to serve the Rose Harbor Subdivision Area was forwarded by the City Council at their meeting of March 29, 1999 to the Public Works Department for the preparation of a Feasibility Report. The petition was checked and found to be in proper form and was signed by 33 of 54 property owners of lots containing a single-family residential dwelling. This represents 61.1 percent of the single-family residential lots within the Rose Harbor Area that are eligible to participate in the City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program adopted by the City Council on December 21, 1999. The Rose Harbor WQPP Project Area also includes 37 undeveloped single-family residential lots. Western Walls Petition A petition for sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, sub -drain, street construction and curb & gutter was forwarded by the City Council at their meeting of March 19, 2001 to the Department of Public Works for the preparation of a Feasibility Report. This petition was received from Bob DeWitz requesting that the City construct public improvements to serve undeveloped lots owned by Western Walls that are located adjacent to the Rose Harbor WQPP project area. In addition to Western Walls lots, there are 15 undeveloped lots that are affected by Mr. DeWitz's petition, as these lots are located within the area that Mr. Dewitz petition represents. Feasibility Report Water Quality Protection Program Project Area We report that the above referenced Water Quality Protection Program project is feasible and recommend its construction. The location of this project is within an area of existing single-family residential development that currently lacks public sanitary sewer. The Area is currently served by the public water system that was purchased by the City from REA a number of years ago. A majority of the septic systems this Area were constructed prior to the State of Minnesota and Olmsted County having any requirements or standards for construction of septic systems. The lots are typically under''/s acre in size and are unable to absorb the nitrates created from the septic systems. There is an increasing threat of contamination to the City of Rochester's ground water supply as the existing septic systems begin to fail. This project would allow property owners of lots containing existing single-family residential dwellings to connect to the public sanitary sewer system rather than replacing their old systems when they fail. This project also allows the undeveloped single-family residential lots to develop with public sanitary sewer and watermain. The proposed project consists of the installation of 8-inch sanitary sewer lines, replacement of existing watermain with new 8-inch watermain lines (requested by RPU), and sanitary sewer and water service connections throughout the Rose Harbor WQPP Project Area. The Department of Public Works also proposes to construct storm sewer in Harbor Drive SE as the area lacks a storm sewer system, and to construct concrete curb & gutter to facilitate surface water drainage to the proposed storm sewer. The WQPP petition does not include a request for concrete curb & gutter. However, the WQPP Project Manager conducted a design meeting for the Rose Harbor Area property owners on March , 2001. The WQPP Project Manager informed the property owners in attendance of the City's desire to construct concrete curb & gutter in the Rose Harbor Area. r? s ' The costs of this WQPP project are proposed to be recovered through sanitary sewer and watermain connection charges (Utility Connection Agreements), sales tax revenue appropriated to the City of Rochester, Water Quality Protection Program, for existing single-family residential lots that contain a dwelling, storm sewer area charges to undeveloped parcels, curb and gutter charges, and Rochester Public Utility share for watermain replacement. Applicable Connection Charge Rates and per Lot Caps Since the Rose Harbor Subdivision Area petition was received prior to August 1, 1999, the date that the Water Quality Protection Program rates and per lot caps were adjusted by the change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index as measured in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area during the preceding calendar year, the Department of Public Works recommends that the sanitary sewer connection charges for this project be based on the connection charge rates and per lot caps in affect at the time the petition was received by the City as follows: • Maximum sanitary sewer connection charge rate of $37.74 per foot of frontage. • Maximum sanitary sewer and water connection charge rate of $66.30 per foot of frontage. • Maximum sewer charge per lot cap for a developed lot that contains a habitable single family dwelling unit shall be as follows: 1) maximum $4,313.14 per lot for any developed lot 1/2 acre or less. 2) $4,313.14 per lot, plus $0.099016 per square foot for any developed lot greater than acre up to 1-1/2 acre. 3) maximum $3,626.28 per lot for any developed lot 1-1/2 acre or larger. Concrete Curb & Gutter The lots within the WQPP petition area are subject to charges for concrete curb & gutter based on the actual cost to construct the concrete curb & gutter. The estimated curb & gutter rate is $11.70 per foot of chargeable frontage. If the City Council determines that concrete curb & gutter will not be constructed within the WQPP petition area, then the properties within the area will not be subject to charges for concrete curb & gutter. Western Walls Petition Project Area We report that the above referenced petition project is feasible. The project includes the construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, sub -drain, street construction and curb & gutter. The project is within an area of existing single-family residential development. The costs for this project area are proposed to be fully recovered from assessments against the undeveloped lots abutting the project area. Availabilitv of sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the project areas: Public sanitary sewer is currently available in Rose Drive at the west edge of Rose Harbor Subdivision. The WQPP project area and the Western Walls' petition area can be served by existing trunkline sanitary sewer, therefore the extension of sub-trunkline sanitary sewer is not required. Asa. Public watermain is currently available to serve both project areas. However, 4,260 feet of watermain will be replaced with a 12-inch trunk watermain to serve the entire southeast service area including Rose Harbor Subdivision. The City is currently under contract for the construction of a new 500,000-gallon water tower to serve the southeast service area (Rose Harbor site). This water tower will serve the water needs for the entire southeast service area. The estimated construction costs and expenses of the project made without completed plans or survey are as follows: WQPP Project Area Sanitary Sewer Watermain (trunk watermain and replacement) Sewer and Water Service Connection Stub -outs Storm Sewer Concrete Curb & Gutter Estimated Cost for WQPP Project Area Western Walls Petition (Developer Expenses) Street Construction (includes excavation, base, curb & gutter, street paving) Sanitary Sewer Watermain Storm Sewer Service Connections Rock Excavation Estimated Project Costs for Western Walls Petition Estimated Project Costs for WQPP Area and Western Wall's Petition Estimated Cost for WQPP Project Area Estimated Project Costs for Western Walls Petition Estimated Project Costs for WQPP Area and Western Wall's Petition The estimated project costs for the WQPP Area and Western Walls Petition Area are proposed to be funded as follows: Utility Connection Agreements Curb & Gutter Charges in WQPP Project Area Developer Assessments (Western Walls Petition) Storm Sewer Area Charge (per lot charge) RPU (Watermain Replacement) WQPP Trunk Watermain (transfer to project J9604) Sales Tax Revenue (see below) Estimated Project Costs Estimated Cost $ 533,597 712,131 174,522 211,055 142,272 $ 1,773,577 Estimated Cost $ 147,843 117,130 139,204 23,028 56,160 128,700 $ 617,065 Estimated Cost $ 1,773,577 617,065 $ 2,390,642 Estimated Cost $ 482,905 106,447 617,065 105,534 64,350 505,673 508,668 $2,390,642 253 ' Amount of sales tax revenue required for the Project Estimated Cost Sales Tax (Rate Cap and per Lot Cap) $ 468,168 Sanitary Sewer Service Connection Stub -outs (54 lots x $750) 40,500 Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Funding Required for Construction of Project $ 508,668 Estimated additional sales tax revenue required for work on private property Of the 91 lots within the project area 54 lots contain a single-family residential dwelling. These lots are eligible for Allowances through the Water Quality Protection Program as follows: Amount of sales tax revenue required for the Proiect Sewer Service Lateral 54 lots x $1,000 per lot Septic Closure 54 lots x $ 500 per lot Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances for Work on Private Property Estimated sales tax revenue required for construction of Project and Allowances Estimated Amount Sales Tax Revenue for Construction of the Project Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Allowances Estimated Amount of Sales Tax Revenue Required for Construction of the Project and Allowances for Work on Private Property Estimated Cost $ 54,000 27,000 $ 81,000 Estimated Cost $ 508,668 81,000 $ 589,668 We recommend that the necessary funding to construct sanitary sewer, watermain and service connections in the Rose Harbor Subdivision WQPP Project Area be done so in accordance wi6the City of Rochester's existing sanitary sewer connection charge policies and the Water Quality Protection Program. Property owners that desire to participate in the Water Quality Protection Program and the benefits contained therein, are required to: 1. Enter into a Utility Connection Agreement with the City within three (3) years of the date the City initiates the project. 2. Connect the existing single-family residential dwelling or existing developed commercial property to the public sewer and water systems within five (5) years of the date of project initiation. 3. Consent to annexation of their property consistent with the conditions of an Orderly Annexation Agreement between the City and Rochester Township, or to the City initiated annexation of the Area as is currently proposed by the City. We recommend that the necessary funding for the Western Walls Petition Area be recovered through special assessments against each lot with the petition area. Each lot will be assessed at the completion of the project on a "per lot" basis. Payment of the "per lot" assessments will be deferred for a period not to exceed December 1, 2003, but must be paid at the time a lot is connected to City sewer and water, sold, or transferred. Interest will accrue at 7.5% simple interest, from the date the original assessment roll is adopted for project J9749 to the date the assessments and accrued interest are paid. No connection to the City sanitary sewer and watermain systems will be permitted until the assessment, plus accrued interest, relative to that lot are paid. Developer/Assessment Agreements will be executed between Western Walls and the City prior to a contract being awarded for construction of the project. a5l Submitted for your consideration: M. Project Protection Program BUDGET AND ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Project No: M1-05 J No: 9749 Date (Orig.) 03/20/2001 Description: "Sanitary Sewer Extension to Serve the Rose Harbor Subdivision Area and Public Improvements to Serve Undeveloped Property Located in the Rose Harbor Subdivision Area." Construction WQPP Project Area Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Connections Storm Sewer Concrete Curb & Gutter Western Walls Petition Area En eineerin vA nterest/Contineencv Total Construction & Expense Cost Distribution Anticipated Utility Connection Agreements Sales Tax Funding Special Assessments (Western Walls Petition Area) Storm Sewer Charges Water Quality Protection Program Trunk Watermain (transfer to J9604) Water Department Share Watermain Replacement TOTAL Make Initial Disbursement from P. I. R. Fund Project Contract Final Budget Cost Cost $ 958,252 134,248 109,440 551,687 $2,390,642 $ 589,352 617,065 505,673 64,350 $2,390,642 Western Walls Petition estem Walls Petition [WQPP Project ®e IMI Western Walls Petition WQPP 1:1 WQPP 61 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 4PJ4�"? DATE: 05/07/01 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. ., i0LUTIONS AND ORDINANCES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE G i i nM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES TERRY ADKINS G. 1. RESOLUTIONS G. 2. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES, as appropriate. G. 3. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (for adoption). None Scheduled G.4. MISCELLANEOUS )UNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: