The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/05/2006_Recessed4 CITY OF ROCHESTER 1/ 5 COUNCIL AGENDA Vl0 COUNCILIBOARD CHAMBERS GOVERNMENT CENTER 151 4TH STREET SE MEETING NO. 17 JULY 5, 2006 RECESSED 7:00 P.M. F)UMCE Cr ALLEGUNCE PAG L 1-2 A) OPEN COMMENT PERIOD B) CALL TO ORDER C) LETTERS AND PETITIONS 3-4 1) Gene Wente 5-6 D) CONSENT AGENDA/ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS 1) Approval of Minutes 7-12 2) Request to Amend Response Time Policy 13-14 3) City Hall Remodel Change Order #1 15-16 4) Licenses, Bonds & Miscellaneous City Activities 17-18 5) Approval of Accounts Payable 19-20 6) Award request for proposal for City of Rochester Employee Life Insurance 21-22 7) Collective Bargaining Agreement for 2006-2008 with IUOE Local #70 at WRP 23-26 8) Promotional Appointment — Police Lieutenant — Rochester Police Department 27-30 9) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 31-34 10) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 35-38 11) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 39-42 12) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 43-54 13) Appointments — Police Officer— Rochester Police Department 55-56 14) Consideration of Bids: Replace Communications Center Consoles and Related Equipment 57-60 15) Consideration of Public Utility Board Action 61-62 16) Development Agreement — Hart Farm South 63-64 17) Development Agreement Release — A Portion of Maine Street Development 65-66 18) Consideration of Bids: Hadley Valley Trunk Sanitary Sewer to Serve Sewer Service Area 29A Phase 2, J7744 Council Agenda Wednesday, July 5, 2006 Page 2 of 2 67-68 19) Revocable Permit: Mayo Clinic Rochester — Improvements within Right of Way adjacent to Methodist Hospital 69-70 20) Award of Bid: (J7210) 3rd Avenue NW from Center Street to 2Id Street NW 71-72 21) Professional Services Agreement to Continue Nondegradation Analysis — Phase 2 73-74 22) Owner Contract — Public Improvements to Serve the Opus Building (Mayo Project #23217) 4u' Ave SW & 3'd St SW — J5239 75-76 23) Owner Contract — Public Storm Sewer Relocation to Serve Kemps (North Broadway) — J5240 77-78 24) Owner Contract — Public Improvements to Serve Scenic Oaks Sixth Additional (Excluding Outlot "A") — J5203 79-80 25) First Supplemental Amendment to Development Agreement for The Wilds 26) Change to Two -Way Traffic W. Center St. 1st St NW and 2nd St. NW, from 6`h Ave SW to 16" Ave SW; Kutzky Park Neighborhood 27) Contribution Agreement — Sunstone Kahler, LLC — Reconstruction of 3rd Ave NW between Center St W and 2nd Street NW and Reconstruction of 2nd Ave SW from Center St W to 1 St SW 28) Contribution Agreement — Reconstruction of P Ave NW between Center Street W and 2nd Street NW — Mayo Clinic Rochester properties E) HEARINGS 81-88 1) Zoning District Amendment #06-04 by Badger Hills, LLC to rezone from R-2 to R-1 property located north of Valleyhigh Drive NW and west of West Circle Drive NW within the Badger Hills Subdivision. 89-98 2) Final Plat #05-24 to be known as Scenic Oaks Sixth Addition by R & M Development Company 99-116 3) Type III, Phase III Conditional Use Permit #06-20 by Rochester Ready Mix for installation of a bridge over the South Run of the North Fork of Cascade Creek on property located south of 19`h Street, west of CR22/West Circle Drive and north of Seventh Street N.W. 117-118 4) Consider the Making of Local Improvement Project No. J-7749 "Reconstruction of First Avenue — Center Street to Second Street S.W." 119-120 5) Proposed Assessment for Local Improvement Project No. J-7749 "Reconstruction of First Avenue — Center Street to Second Street S.W." F) REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 121-122 1) Request to Reconsider Substantial Land Alteration for Willow Heights 5v' Subdivision 123-124 2) Sound Amplification Requests 125-126 3) Award of Bid: (J7749) Is'Avenue SW from Center Street to 2nd Street SW G) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 127-128 Council Agenda Wednesday, July 5, 2006 Page 3 of 2 H) TABLED ITEMS 1) OTHER BUSINESS J) ADJOURNMENT REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION iA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: OPEN COMMENT PERIOD CITY ADMINISTRATOR ITEM DESCRIPTION: OPEN COMMENT PERIOD MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 A PREPARED BY: S. KVENVOLD This agenda section is primarily for the purpose of allowing citizens to address the City Council on a topic of their choice. The following guidelines apply: • This section of the agenda may not be used as a forum to continue discussion on an agenda item which has already been held as a public hearing. • This agenda section is limited to 15 minutes and each speaker is limited to 4 minutes. • Any speakers not having the opportunity to be heard will be first to present at the next Council meeting. • Citizens may only use this forum to address the Council on a maximum of one time per month. • Matters currently under negotiation, litigation or related to personnel will not be discussed in this forum. • Questions posed by a speaker will generally be responded to in writing. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: seoond by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION A SECTION: LETTERS AND PETITIONS ORIGINATING DEPT: ADMINISTRATION ell MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 ITEM NO. EM DESCRIPTION: GENO VdENTE PREPARED BY: S.KVENVOLD Mr. Wente of Waste Management wishes to discuss the logistics and ramifications of the districting concept for solid waste collection as being considered by the Olmsted County Board. . OUNCIL ACTION: motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 DA SECTION: UMUIN ai irvu ucr CONSENT AGENDA CITY ADMINISTRATOR ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ITEM NO. D-1-25 G. NEUMANN This RCA lists all the items which have been included in the consent agenda for this meeting. The Council can approve all of the items with a single motion to approve. The Council President will allow the Councilmembers an opportunity to state whether there are any of these items which you wish to have removed from the consent agenda approval and to have them discussed and acted upon separately by the Council. The consent agenda for this meeting consists of the following RCAs: 1) Approval of Minutes 2) Request to Amend Response Time Policy 3) City Hall Remodel Change Order #1 4) Licenses, Bonds & Miscellaneous City Activities 5) Approval of Accounts Payable 6) Award request for proposal for City of Rochester Employee Life Insurance 7) Collective Bargaining Agreement for 2006-2008 with IUOE Local #70 at WRP 8) Promotional Appointment — Police Lieutenant — Rochester Police Department 9) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 10) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 11) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 12) Promotional Appointment — Police Sergeant — Rochester Police Department 13) Appointments — Police Officer — Rochester Police Department 14) Consideration of Bids: Replace Communications Center Consoles and Related Equipment 15) Consideration of Public Utility Board Action 16) Development Agreement — Hart Farm South 17) Development Agreement Release — A Portion of Maine Street Development 18) Consideration of Bids: Hadley Valley Trunk Sanitary Sewer to Serve Sewer Service Area 29A Phase 2, J7744 19) Revocable Permit: Mayo Clinic Rochester — Improvements within Right of Way adjacent to Methodist Hospital COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: Page 2 July 5, 2006 20) Award of Bid: (J7210) 3`d Avenue NW from Center Street to 2nd Street NW 21) Professional Services Agreement to Continue Nondegradation Analysis — Phase 2 22) Owner Contract — Public Improvements to Serve the Opus Building (Mayo Project #23217) 4 h Ave SW & 3 d St SW — J5239 23) Owner Contract — Public Storm Sewer Relocation to Serve Kemps (North Broadway) — J5240 24) Owner Contract — Public Improvements to Serve Scenic Oaks Sixth Additional (Excluding Outlot "A") — J5203 25) First Supplemental Amendment to Development Agreement for The Wilds COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve consent agenda items REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA ADMINISTRATION L ;L, REM DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO AMEND RESPONSE TIME POLICY PREPARED BY: S.KVENVOLD Several years ago, the State Legislature abolished residency requirements, but allowed local governments to establish a time limitation to report to work for certain essential positions. A 30 minute response time was established for certain essential positions and department heads reduced this time requirement to 15 minutes for those positions which are subject to paid standby for emergency call -in (see current attached policy). During a recent meeting of the department heads, it was recommended that the current policy be amended to allow the department heads the discretion to designate the positions which may have a time limit and to establish the time response for those positions. Applicants for these positions would be made aware of the response time requirement during employment interviews. The members of the Personnel Advisory Committee have reviewed the proposed amendment and recommend its adoption. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Request a motion requesting the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending the response time policy as proposed. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by to Message Page 1 of 2 e Kvenvold, Steve From: Peterson, Roger Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 1:20 PM To: 'Sandra Means; Kvenvold, Steve Cc: Marcoux, Marcia; mlmarcoux@aol.com; Nowicki, Bob; Gilsrud, Linda Subject: RE: PAC meeting Sandra — The request for the change in policy was initiated by the Police Department in order to reconcile city policy with current practice. City policy required all employees of the Police Department to be able to report to work within 30 minutes. However, numerous exceptions over the years have made this policy difficult, if not impossible to enforce. This was a result of the following: • Over at least the past three decades, employees had established households beyond the 30 minute range with either explicit or tacit approval of the Department. • Revoking this approval would require that the Department demonstrate the need for the 30 minute response time and consistent enforcement of the rule. • While some specialty assignments (such as the Emergency Response Unit) require a reasonably quick response time, most do not. • Because we could not demonstrate the need for a 30 minute response time for all employees, we could not consistently enforce the policy. Lacking the means to enforce the policy, we requested that it be amended to reflect actual practice. This requires that we consider response time for specific assignments within the Department, but do not require a 30 minute response time for employees for which it is not relevant. Recognizing that there was significant disparity between City departments in this regard, it was proposed that the policy allow each department the discretion to determine appropriate response times based on specific job responsibilities. This will allow us to enforce reasonable response time requirements without imposing undue restriction's on other staff. The change in policy should not result in disenchantment or hardship for staff as it does not impose additional restrictions - it removes them for employees that are not subject to response time requirements. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns — thanks - Roger Response Time (DRAFT) based on discussion at DH meeting City department heads may designate certain job title holders within their department to report to the work site, emergency work site, station, or other location designated by the department head or his/her designee within an established number of minutes. The time requirement (number of minutes) will be established by the department head or his/her designee and stated in job descriptions having a response time requirement. Applicants should be made aware of response time requirements during employment interviews. Interviews conducted by the department interview panel for a promotional position should include a notice or reference to any response time requirement included in the promotional job description. y EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS A. Residence Requirements It shall be a requirement that employees, who hold positions which because of job necessity require that they be available to report to their job location within a time limit, reside within an area which will allow them to report for work within thirty (30) minutes from the time notified. The report time may be reduced to fifteen (15) minutes by a Department Head for those employees who hold positions which are subject to paid standby for emergency call -in. 3. Positions covered by above: Public Utility Service and Meter Supervisor Chief System Operator Cntrl Instruments & Results Tech Electric Constr Spvsr Electric Mtce Spvsr Mechanical Mtce Spvsr Supt of Power Production Mgr Trans Dist Supt Water Operation System Operator Relay Control Tech Lead Machinist Machinist Certified Welder Service Worker - Water Div Operator Water Div Lead Plant Mechanic Plant Mechanic Lead Electrician Park and Recreation Supt Park and Recreation Dir of Park Dir Forestry Dir Operations Dir Golf Electrician Stores Controller Lead Store Clerk Store Clerk Heavy Crew Foreman Lead Lineworker First Class Lineworker Lead Tree Trimmer Tree Trimmer Lead Cableworker Cableworker Heavy Duty Line Truck Operator Line Truck Operator Utility Equipment Operator Electrician Distribution Foreman Water Div Utility Worker — Water Div Electronic Technician Park Supervisor Office Services Supervisor Bldg Engineer Mayo Civic Center Bldg Mtce Wrkr III Rec Center Asst Supt Public Works Crew Chief III Sewer Equip Oper III Sewer Equip Oper I Sewer Crew Chief III Night Equip Oper III Sweeper Night Equip Oper I Sander Police Asst Mtce Supt Equip Oper IV Equip Oper 11 Traffic Aide Sign Mtce Sr Eng Tech Traffic Mtce Supt All personnel covered by civil service rules and regulations Civilian Dispatcher Fire All personnel covered by civil service rules and regulations 4. New employees hired for the positions listed in three (3) above whose current residence does not allow them to meet the requirements in one (1) above, shall be required to establish residence which will allow them to meet the requirements not later than twelve (12) months after the date they were hired to fill the position. B. Promotions to the positions listed in paragraph three (3) above may be withheld from employees whose residence would prevent them from meeting the thirty (30) minutes response time. Consent ITEM DESCRIPTION: City REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Remodel Change Order #1 Administration MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 b3 PREPARED BY: Doug Knott-t>l, On 03/06/06 the City Council awarded a bid in the amount of $48,000 to A. B. Systems for remodeling work in City Hall for improvements to Public Works and City Clerk space. That work is now complete. During the course of construction several additional changes were made, primarily for mechanical and electrical system improvements, that were not part of the original bid. The total cost of these changes amounts to $1,596, COUNCIL ACTION REOUESTED: Approve Change Order No. 1 to the A.B. Systems City Hall remodeling contract in the amount of $1,596.00 COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 07/05/06 ^ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM CONSENT AGENDA CITY CLERK ITEM DESCRIPTION: LICENSES, BONDS & MISCELLANEOUS CITY ACTIVITIES PREPARED BY: Bethany Gerber The following licenses, bonds and miscellaneous activities are submitted for the Council's approvals or disapprovals. All are pending departmental approvals, the required insurance, bonds, fees and all outstanding debts with the City of Rochester. MISCELLANEOUS Hanny's Men's and Women's Store 19-1n Avenue SW Rochester, MN 55902 Annual Sidewalk Sale 7/20-7/22 7 AM to 8 PM American Legion Department Convention Parade 84 10`t' St. NW Rochester, MN 55901 Soldier's Field North to Central Park 7/21/06 7PM to 8PM SINGLE GAMBLING Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce 220 South Broadway Suite 100 Rochester, MN 55904 Willow Creek Golf Course -Raffle 7/26/06 Church of the Resurrection 1600 11"Avenue SE Rochester, MN 55904 Church of the Resurrection -Raffle- 8/27/06 SIDEWALKS -CEMENT Anderson Cement Inc. Troy Anderson 3810 210d' Street East Farmington, MN 55024 COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: VICENSE, BONDS AND MISCELLANEOUS CITY ACTIVIES PAGE JULY 5, 2006 MISCELLANEOUS March of Dimes 32 Woodlake Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 Night Lights 8K Run at Soldier's Field Park SALE OF FIREWORKS Shopko Store South 2820 Hwy 63 South Rochester, MN 55904 Selling fireworks in Parking Lot COUNCIL ACTION REOUESTED 10/06/06 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM A motion to approve the above licenses, bonds and miscellaneous city activities. A REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION A SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: Consent Agenda Finance Department ASCRIPTION: Approval of Accounts Payable Respectfully request a motion to approve the following cash disbursements: Investment purchases of $18,697,060.83 Accounts payable of $8 898,663.82 Total disbursements $27,595,724.65 (Detailed listing of disbursements submitted separately.) COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: MEETING ' DATE: 7/3106 T SY: Dale Martinson REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING t f DATE: 7/5/06 Consent Agenda Finance Department ITEM DESCRIPTION: Award request for proposal for City of Rochester employee life insurance L� Jennifer King Proposals were received from seven life insurance companies for City sponsored employee life insurance and optional life insurance for employees, their spouses and dependents. The following companies responded to the request for proposal; Minnesota Life, Lafayette Life, Standard Insurance, Jefferson Pilot, ME Life, Principal, and Madison National. Jefferson Pilot, Principal, and Madison National did not comply with the specifications. The following rates were received from the other insurance companies. Optional Life Basic Life rates per $1,000 Financial Per $1,000 AD&D based on age Rating Minnesota Life $0.20 $0.02 $0.07 - $3.02 A+ Lafayette Life $0.20 $0.03 $0.07 - $2.39 A+ Standard Ins. $0.21 $0.03 $0.11 - $3.01 A ME Life $0.25 $0.03 $0.13 - $3.05 A City staff recommends that Minnesota Life, the incumbent insurance carrier, be awarded the insurance contract for the City sponsored employee life insurance and the optional life insurance plan. The recommendation is based on the proposed rates for the Basic Life and AD&D supplied as this comprises the direct cost to the City for life insurance benefits. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Award the insurance proposal to Minnesota Life Insurance Company for the employee life insurance and optional insurance plans. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign a contract for the above named services. COUNCIL ACTION: motion by. second by RM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING �k DATE: 7/5/06 A SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO, Consent I Human Resources ITEM DESCRIPTION: Collective Bargaining Agreement for 2006-2008 with VKt1 AKtu MT: CaAsrud NOE Local #70 at WRP LtndaCAI�_ Wage Adjustment: 2% wage rate adjustment shall be retroactive to 1/5/06 2% wage rate adjustment shall be effective 1/4/07 2.75%wage rate adjustment shall be effective 1/3/08 For four job titles within the bargaining group identified by IUOE Local #70 membership, (Master Mechanic, Crew Chief, Electronics)Electrical Technician, Lab Technician) the City will pay an additional $.05 per hour retroactive to 1/5/06 in addition to 2% general wage adjustment, an additional $.10 per hour on 1/4/07 in addition to 2% general adjustment, and an additional $.10 per hour on 1/3/08 in addition to 2.75% general adjustment. The union refers to the negotiated additional cents per hour for the four job titles as "pay competitiveness" adjustments. Other changes: 1. Modify Article 11. Unused Sick Leave to reflect Agreement between City and the Health Care Task Force - When an employee terminates employment after ten (10) years of regular full-time or regular part-time employment with the City of Rochester and is pension eligible, the City will convert forty percent (40%) of the employee's unused sick leave balance to be deposited to an individual Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS) Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP). If an employee terminates City employment after ten (10) years of regular full-time or regular part-time employment but is not pension eligible, the conversion of forty percent (40%) of the unused sick leave balance will be delayed for deposit to a HCSP until such time as the former employee becomes pension eligible. 2. Add New Article on Option to Purchase City -Sponsored Health Coverage Dental Coverage and/or Life Insurance After Early or Regular Retirement 3. Modify Article 12. Health Coverage. C. The City will pay 95% of the cost of individual health coverage. The City will pay 95% of the cost of dependent health coverage. 4. Modify Article 23. Term. January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2008. Any wage increases negotiated would be effective the beginning of the first pay period in January each year. 5. With the approval of the department head or his/her designee, an employee may attend a funeral for someone other than immediate family members listed in the City's funeral leave policy and the time off shall be deducted from accrued sick leave up to a maximum of sixteen (16) hours per calendar year and using a minimum of two hours of sick leave for each funeral attended. 6. Agreed on minor clarifications and corrections to the agreement Council Action Requested: Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. Z3REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/6/06 GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Organizational I Consent Human Resources ITEM DESCRIPTION: Promotional Appointment - Police Lieutenant - PREPARED BY: Rochester Police Department Linda Gilsrud _n The retirement of Police Lieutenant John O'Neil effective June 26, 2006 creates a vacancy for the position of Police Lieutenant. Police Chief Roger Peterson has requested the Police Lieutenant position be filled effective July 6, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed Police Sergeant Dan Pulford to the position of Police Lieutenant in the Rochester Police Department effective July 6, 2006. This information is given to the Council so that Council members are aware of the appointment. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion Second M Mayor Ardell R Brede hdw 201 4th Street SE - Room 281 a�ucrsv Rochester, MN 55904-3782 "W', Phone: (507) 28"080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator Stevan Kvenvold RE: Promotional Appointment / Rochester Police Department &�yCNf 57tR•dl/it qR ._ VQ17F i). I: M^2 Based on the certified Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Sergeant Dan Pulford to the position of Police Lieutenant effective July 6, 2006. li- Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources ' 50 d j err;; r r F t4.v? Sii 6/21 /06 Date %j r1M- 9 AS I "'so _=, ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 21, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, The retirement of John O'Neil, Police Lieutenant, effective June 26, 2006, creates a vacancy for the position of Police Lieutenant. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Lieutenant from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Lieutenant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Dan Pulford 2. Kent Perlich 3. John Laivell Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of appointment be July 6, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, 44�44,_ James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission An T4w(OppoHwunr Vnpbytr / ROCHESTER June 20, 2006 Richard Dale, Chairperson Rochester Police Civil Service Commission City Hall, Room 295 201 4 s Street SE Rochester, MN 55904 Dear Chairperson Dale: ROGER PETERSON Chief of Police Rochester Police Department 101 4th St. S.E. Rochester, MN 55904-3761 www,ro&estermn.gov We are requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Lieutenant's eligibility list for selection and appointment. This request is due to the position made vacant by the retirement of Lt. John O'Neil on June 26, 2006. We are also requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Sergeant's eligibility list for selection and appointment for Sergeant's position made vacant by: Promotion of Sgt. Pulford to Lieutenant on July 6, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. LangNVorthy on June 21, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Vi1: on June 30, 2006 New Sergeant position as Emergency Communications Coordinator It is our desire that these promotions would be effective July 6, 2006. Vre appreciate the Commission's prompt attention, in this matter. Sincerely, .� Rog r L. Peterson Chief of Police C: L. Gilsrud, Human Resources Director S. Kvenvold, City Administrator i, 'rm .'i'pprrtursiry-n'pkcr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/08 '.GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Organizational / Consent I Human Resources h -q N: Promotional Appointment - Police Rochester Police Department Linda Gilsrud The promotion of Police Sergeant Dan Pulford to Police Lieutenant effective July 6, 2006 creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. Police Chief Roger Peterson has requested the Police Sergeant position be filled effective July 6, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed Police Officer Paul Wilson to the position of Police Sergeant in the Rochester Police Department effective July 6, 2006. This information is given to the Council so that Council members are aware of the appointment. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by. — second by:_ __ to: Mayor Ardell F Brede 201 4th Street SE — Room 281 u.rr CA= Rochester, MN 55904-3782 Phone: (507) 285.8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator Stevan Kvenvold RE: Promotional Appointment / Rochester Police Department OcvtisrrR,jj,�`` k, TEG 1L 4l'S'T-5 w Based on the certified Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Officer Paul Wilson to the position of Police Sergeant effective July 6, 2006. 6/21 /06 Mayor Ardell F. Brede Date City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources L } s Fs i ill!1 1 Il lhil lil@ fiv�ti` 1 � 1 :. 6 ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 21, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, The promotion of Dan Pulford, Police Sergeant, effective July 6, 2006, creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Sergeant from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Paul Wilson 2. Jim Evenson 3. Jon Turk Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of appointment be July 6, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission An Eq-loppo -q V,9,1vlu ROCHESTER June 20, 2006 Richard Dale, Chairperson Rochester Police Civil Service Commission City Hall, Room 295 201 4'h Street SE Rochester, MN 55904 Dear Chairperson Dale: ROGER PETERSON Chief of Pofke Rochester Police Department 101 4th St. S.E. Rochester, MN 55904-3761 www.rochestermn.gov We are requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Lieutenant's eligibility list for selection and appointment. This request is due to the position made vacant by the retirement of Lt. John O'Neil on June 26, 2006. We are also requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Sergeant's eligibility list for selection and appointment for Sergeant's position made vacant by: Promotion of Sgt. Pulford to Lieutenant on July 6, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Lang%vorthy on June 21, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Vik on .tune 3-0, 2006 New Sergeant position as Emergency Communications Coordinator It is our desire that these promotions would be effective July 6, 2006. We appreciate the Commission's prompt attention in this matter. Sincerely, . Rbgr L. Peterson Chief of Police C: L. Gilsrud, Human Resources Director S. Kvenvold, Citv Administrator ire YualOppnavni: y Zrnjrbvcr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1 DATE: 7/1;/ng %GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM Organizational / Consent Human Resources ITEM DESCRIPTION: Promotional Appointment - Police Sergeant - PREPARED BY: Rochester Police Department Linda Giisrud� The retirement of Police Sergeant Bruce Langworthy effective June 21, 2006 creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. Police Chief Roger Peterson has requested the Police Sergeant position be filled effective July 6, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed Police Officer Jim Evenson to the position of Police Sergeant in the Rochester Police Department effective July 6, 2006. This information is given to the Council so that Council members are aware of the appointment. COUNCILACTION: Moflonby: second by: to: Mayor Ardell R Brede him 201 4th Street SE — Room 281 eu OUREA MY Rochester, MN 55904-8782 IF Phone: (507) 285-8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator Stevan Kvenvold RE: Promotional Appointment 1 Rochester Police Department aV�NE�iER 1f/11 ♦fit ;.—," �.SG Fr�Rar'FD AIf Based on the certified Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Officer Jim Evanson to the position of Police Sergeant effective July 6, 2006. Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6121106 Date �0 10 ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 21, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, a`�Htc7LN p .iU. The retirement of Bruce Langworthy, Police Sergeant, effective June 21, 2006, creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Sergeant from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Jim Evenson 2. Jon Turk 3. John Sherwin Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of appointment be July 6, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission A. Twnn I M nn.N.n.W ?.wry %mae 4 ROCHESTER ��lrC G✓2i7 E:i lt�� June 20,2006 Richard Dale, Chairperson Rochester Police Civil Service Commission City Hall, Room 295 201 4'h Street SE Rochester, MN 55904 Dear Chairperson Dale: ROGER PETERSON Chief of Police Rochester Police Department 101 4th St. S.E. Rochester, MN 55904-3761 www.rochestermn.gov We are requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Lieutenant's eligibility list for selection and appointment. This request is due to t11e position made vacant by the retirement of Lt. John O'Neil on June 26, 2006. We are also requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Sergeant's eligibility list for selection and appointment for Sergeant's position made vacant by: Promotion of Sgt. Pulford to Lieutenant on .luly 6, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Langworthy on June 21, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Vik on June 30, 2006 New Sergeant position as Emergency Communications Coordinator It is our desire that these promotions would be effective July 6, 2006. \i'e 2p 7reetaie the Commission's prompt attention In this matter. Sincerely, .1 Roes@r L. Pe. Chief of Policc C: L. Gilsrud, Htunan Resources Director S. Kvenvold. City Administrator ."n aucl'Oppnn:: rtiry'Im},Inuer REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/.YmF GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Organizational / Consent Human Resources _ 11 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Promotional Appointment - Police Sergeant - Rochester Police Department PREPARED BY: - ud Linda GilsrJd The City Council approval on June 19, 2006 to designate the Emergency Communications Coordinator position as a first -line supervisory, Police Sergeant, position creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. Police Chief Roger Peterson has requested the Police Sergeant position be filled effective July 6, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed Police Officer Jon Turk to the position of Police Sergeant in the Rochester Police Department effective July 6, 2006. This information is given to the Council so that Council members are aware of the appointment. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by to: i Mayor t F. Brede 201 4th Street SE —Roomoom 281 Aw.ANEV"arr Rochester, MN 55904-3782 VI Phone: (507) 285-8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator Stevan Kvenvold RE: Promotional Appointment / Rochester Police Department `,`QJI RESTER 111.��f f� F��k1TCD Utl iA. Based on the certified Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Officer Jon Turk to the position of Police Sergeant effective July 6, 2006. 6/21 /06 Mayor Ardell F. Brede Date City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources E n ��. 11 AL�LNEKCAUM June 21, 2006 ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, R(1CHic1'F R�flll a.r, �� t4I O.; Fre.FrS� The City Council approval on June 19, 2006 to designate the Emergency Communications Coordinator position as a first -line supervisory, Police Sergeant, position creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Sergeant from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Jon Turk 2. John Sherwin 3. Tim Lutzke Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of appointment be July 6, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission r. An'L4ua(OPR✓ftun4 Dn+C&Yu ROCHESTER ,/%/�iruze�ata June 20, 2006 Richard Dale, Chairperson Rochester Police Civil Service Commission Citv Hall, Room 295 20146 Street SE Rochester, MN 55904 Dear Chairperson Dale: ROGER PETERSON Chiel of Poice Rochester Police Department 101 4th St. S.E. Rochester, MN 55904-3761 www.rochestermn.gov We are requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Lieutenant's eligibility list for selection and appointment. This request is due to the position made vacant by the retirement of Lt. John O'Neil on June 26, 2006. We are also requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Sergeant's eligibility list for selection and appointment for Sergeant's position made vacant by: Promotion of Sgt. Pulford to Lieutenant on July 6, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Langworthy on June 21, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Vik on June 30, 2006 New Sergeant position as Emergency Communications Coordinator It is our desire that these promotions would be effective July 6, 2006. 1Ve appreciate the Commission's prompt attention in this matter. Sincerely, .� Rog L. Peterson Chief of Police C: L. Gilsrud, Human Resources Director S. Kvenvold. City Administrator :t" Z;uc: Dprrnnvnity Dr pl yrr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION GENDA SECTION: Organizational / Consent ORIGINATING DEPT: Human Resources - Police Sergeant - Rochester Police Department MEETING 1 1 DATE: 7/sr06 —'�L PREPARED Linda Gilsrud The retirement of Police Sergeant Michael Vik effective June 30, 2006 creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. Police Chief Roger Peterson has requested the Police Sergeant position be filled effective July 6, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed Police Officer John Sherwin to the position of Police Sergeant in the Rochester Police Department effective July 6, 2006. This information is given to the Council so that Council members are aware of the appointment. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: Mayor Ardell F. Brede how 201 4th Street SE — Room 281 ♦u,ANMZWAcrrr Rochester, MN 55904-3782 Vle Phone: (507) 285-8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator Stevan Kvenvold RE: Promotional Appointment / Rochester Police Department k'TrD AIGl Based on the certified Police Sergeant Eligibility Poster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Officer John Sherwin to the position of Police Sergeant effective July 6, 2006. ,4 Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6/21 /06 Date ROCHESTER kt�n k t 4p��1ti5TLk S /� rr ,fir:•! �L l..1 POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 21, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, The retirement of Michael Vik, Police Sergeant, effective June 30, 2006, creates a vacancy for the position of Police Sergeant. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Sergeant from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Sergeant Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. John Sherwin 2. Tim Lutzke 3. Daryl Seidel Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of appointment be July 6, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission A. FnuuLO.w tudtu'Fm rmff II HM ROCHESTER June 20, 2006 Richard Dale, Chairperson Rochester Police Civil Service Commission City Hall, Room 295 201 4" Street SE Rochester, MN 55904 Dear Chairperson Dale: LL• ROGER PETERSON ChW of Police Rochester Police Department 101 4th St. S.E. Rochester, MN 55904-3761 www.rochestermn.gov We are requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Lieutenant's eligibility list for selection and appointment. This request is due to the position made vacant by the retirement of Lt. John O'Neil on June 26, 2006. We are also requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Sergeant's eligibility list for selection and appointment for Sergeant's position made vacant by: Promotion of Sgt. Pulford to Lieutenant on July 6, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. Langworthy on June 21, 2006 Retirement of Sgt. \rik on June 30, 2006 New Sergeant position as Emergency Communications Coordinator It is our desire that these promotions would be effective July 6, 2006. We appreciate the Commission`s prompt attention 1. this matter. Sincerely, -� Rog r L. Peterson Chief of Policc C: L. Gilsrud, Human Resources Director S. Kvenvold, City Administrator ..rc ?s;uc Opr+•rtuniry art�dnva REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: Organizational / Consent Human Resources 2 / MEETING 7 DATE: 7/5/06 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Appointments - Police Officer - rmr-rfartcu G l Rochester Police Department Linda Gilsrud The retirements of Police Officer Randy Mohawk effective May 19, 2005, Police Officer Penny Micklus effective September 5, 2005, Police Officer Greg Meyer January 6, 2006, the resignation of Police Officer Jerald Starks effective May 17, 2006 and to fill a full-time position created when two officers requested part-time status, creates five (5) vacancies for the position of Police Officer. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Section 9.00 of the Rochester Home Rule Charter states that the Mayor appoints all members of the Rochester Police Department. Pursuant to that authority, the Mayor has appointed Albert Arzola, Joshua Laber, Craig Sammon, David Satzke, and Trevor Wahlen to the position of Police Officer in the Rochester Police Department effective July 7, 2006. This information is given to the Council so that Council members are aware of the appointment. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by second by: to: N i Mayor Brede 201 4th Streeteet SE — —Room 281 AL MMCA Crre Rochester, MN 55904-3782 Phone: (507) 285.8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator RE: Appointment to Police Department �i�CHE iTER• 1Ui 1 } 4S c. f 'r�ki TED Al4L �T•!•w Based on the certified Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Albert Arzola to the position of Police Officer effective July 7. 2006. ,� � �• rF - -- - - Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6r1l06 D ate Mayor Ardell F. Brede bftd 201 4th Sweet SE — Room 281 Al 4AME6ICA CM Rochester, MN 55904-8782 WRPhone: (507) 285.8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator RE: Appointment to Police Department &n[HESTEB.,%I/ k� of - '��`s, I�k.4TC D.AVGL�S.Y• Based on the certified Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing David Satzke to the position of Police Officer effective July 7, 2006, Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6/1 /06 Date I Mayor Ardell F. Brede bftd 201 4th Street SE — Room 281 MY Rochester, MN 55904-3782 IFPhone: (507) 285-8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator RE: Appointment to Police Department C"E STCH • \II \ \ - i 1 �FGk 1T'I'p AI 4t 55•yw Based on the certified Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Trevor Wahlen to the position of Police Officer effective July 7, 200 - Mayor Ardell F. Breda City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6f1106 D ate Mavor Ardell F. Brede boa 201 4th Street SE - Room 281 A AAa+]tICACfII' Rochester, MN 55904-3782 $W Phone: (507) 285-8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator RE: Appointment to Police Department &tl(tIESTER•t!!,1\'F' i y ! 7 1-- k 11 r D, AlGGSS•c•w Based on the certified Police Officer Eligibility Poster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Joshua Labe r to the position of Police Officer effective July 7. 2006. Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6/1 /06 Date I Mayor Ardell F. Brede bftd 201 4th Street SE — Room 281 AL[ AMENW CnT Rochester, MN 55904-3782 Phone: (507) 285-8080 Fax: (507) 287-7979 TO: City Administrator RE: Appointment to Police Department �n�HLCTER F O .{� i Uk1TF0 ilGl T_y.� Based on the certified Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates, I am appointing Craig Sammon to the position of Police officer effective July 7. 2006. Mayor Ardell F. Brede City of Rochester Cc: Linda Gilsrud Director of Human Resources 6/1 /06 Date J ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 1, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, AircriL>'ree 'o wdTt:,:ar,..v t s. The retirement of Randy Mohawk, Police Officer, effective May 19, 2005 created a vacancy for the position of Police Officer. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Albert Arzola 2. David Satzke 2. Trevor Wahlen Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of employment be June 8, 2006 conditional upon completion of the required job related physical strength and agility examination and use of force training prior to the effective date of appointment of July 7, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission An ffiudOCVUrtuniN Smprow ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 1, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, �ROCt C:TEF qet �, .. R rrR left . , ts'e y" The request and authorization of Police Officers Andrea Baron and Julie Claymon to part- time employment status effective July 7, 2005 created a vacancy for the position of Police Officer. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: David Satzke 2. Trevor Wahlen 2. Joshua Laber Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of employment be June 8. 2006 conditional upon completion of the required job related physical strength and agility examination and use of force training prior to the effective date of appointment of July 7, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, J- ; tWK_ James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission r Art TF dovaort niwTm %wvr ROCHESTER -,�/Ar;WeJa'1a POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE .TAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 1,2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, - S Jn Y.. aHIIk1°� au�t`t * n• The retirement of Penny Micklus, Police Officer, effective September 5, 2005 created a vacancy for the position of Police Officer. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: Trevor Wahlen 2. Joshua Laber 3. Craig Sammon Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of employment be June 8, 2006 conditional upon completion of the required job related physical strength and agility examination and use of force training prior to the effective date of appointment of July 7, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission 0.'P.10.n nfly Emv(owr ROCHESTER POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON SARLOW June 1,2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, 4 PR �N EMI ER of It P�,_ r J8*rr4 it U .Rr l 5: The retirement of Greg Meyer, Police Officer, effective January 6, 2006 created a vacancy for the position of Police Officer. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Joshua Laber 2. Craig Sammon 3. James Didion Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of employment be June 8, 2006 conditional upon completion of the required job related physical strength and agility examination and use of force training prior to the effective date of appointment of July 7, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission 9.. 4nuarllnunrNnutU EMO&UC i ROCHESTER ,irr&e-4araz ROCNL5TF.k.;,yt�.Y1� J� ,r t '- POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RICHARD DALE JAMES RUSSELL DON BARLOW June 1, 2006 Honorable Mayor Brede City Hall Rochester, Minnesota 55904 Dear Mayor Brede, The resignation of Jerald Starks, Police Officer, effective May 17, 2006 created a vacancy for the position of Police Officer. We respectfully request that you make one (1) appointment to the position of Police Officer from the following list of candidates who stand highest on the Police Officer Eligibility Roster of qualified candidates: 1. Craig Sammon 2. James Didion 3. Jeremy Ralston Police Chief Roger Peterson requests that the effective date of employment be June 8, 2006 conditional upon completion of the required job related physical strength and agility examination and use of force training prior to the effective date of appointment of July 7, 2006. Respectfully Submitted, James Russell Secretary Police Civil Service Commission A. TA%.10aeor urtifv T"[a �.00HES i ER MYY11{ V'11111AY ROGER PETERSON Chief of Police Rochester Police Department 101 4th St. S.E. Rochester, MN 55904-3761 www.rochestermn.gov May 31, 2006 Richard Dale, Chairperson Rochester Police Civil Service Commission City Hall, Room 295 201 4" Street SE Rochester, MN 55904 Dear Chairperson Dale: We are requesting that the Civil Service Commission provide the Mayor with a list of the top three candidates from the Police Officer's eligibility list for selection and appointment for each of the five open entry-level positions. This request is due to the retirements of Officers Mohawk, Micklus, Meyer, the resignation of Officer Gerald Starks, and to fill a full-time position created when two of our officers accepted half time status. It is our desire that these positions be filled as soon as possible. We appreciate the attention of the Commission to this matter. Sincerely, - W,_- Roger L. Peterson Chief of Police C: L. Gilsrud, Human Resources Director S. Kvenvold, City Administrator A. E1.9tOppolm-iry E-p6yer REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING !J DATE: July 5, 20 6 " ;ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Agenda Police b - 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Replace Communications Center Consoles and PREPARED BY: related equipment Roger Peterson Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m.., June 20, 2006 for the following project: Communications Center Console Furniture Replacement Project No. 2035 The following bids were received: Karns Services, Inc. $54,912.20 Watson Furniture Bid not read, no bond attached or enclosed with bid. The project is included in the 2006 Capital Improvement Projects and budgeted for $55,600. An issue has been raised as to the manner in which the specifications for the bid were drafted. After _onsultation aZth the city attorney's office we are recommending that all bids be rejected on the basis that the specifications need to be redrawn. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted rejecting all bids. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by seed by: to: 1/1 Meeting REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date_ 7/0 AGENDA SECTION ORIGINATING DEPT: ITE NO` Rochester Public Utilities Consent Agenda 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: Kathy Wilson Consideration of Public Utility Board Action The Rochester Public Utility Board has approved the following on June 27, 2006 and requests the Common Council's favorable consideration: to approve a resolution to approve the negotiation and execution of a contract agreement with Utility Engineering to provide professional engineering services for the engineering, design, contract procurement support, construction management, site engineering, commissioning and start up work for the Silver Lake Plant Unit 4 Emissions Reduction Project, subject to review by the City Attorney and concurrence of the RPU General Manager, for a not to exceed amount of $4,375,750.00 which includes a 15% contingency, and that the Common Council authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the agreement.. to approve a resolution to approve revisions to the Traffic Signals Rate Schedule TS effective July 5, 2006. MANAGER.Vot'/2rnt G/p'tP/G6 GENERAL COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: V3 FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item # S.a. Meeting Date: 6127106 • Engineering Services for Silver Lake Power Plant SUBJECT. Unit 4 Emissions Reduction Project PREPARED BY: Wally 5chlink, Director of Power Resources ITEM DESCRIPTION: Beginning in 2003, a team of RPU staff and consultants have been working on an emission reduction ni program that would result in significantly reducing both the rate and the total amount of emissions from Silver Lake Power Plant Unit 4. The Utility Board approved going forward with the permitting, engineering and design activities at the July 25, 2005 meeting. Since that time staff has been involved in refining the feasibility study and the related scope, cost estimates and schedule. More importantly, staff continued to negotiate an agreement that would set the design parameters and other obligations that the utility must conform to in the implementation of the emissions reduction project. Staff reached an agreement and at the May 30, 2006 Utility Board meeting the Board approved the agreement. Staff is now ready to proceed with the first significant activity required to make the emission reduction plan into a reality. That first step is to retain an engineering firm that will be responsible for the engineering, design, contract procurement support, construction management, site engineering, commissioning and start up work for the project. in May 2006 RPU staff, assisted by R.W. Beck our consultant for the project, developed and distributed a Request for Proposals for Professional Services for the engineering services listed above. The proposal was distributed to six engineering firms that were of the size, qualifications, experience and expertise to provide the engineering services for the project. On June 8, 2006 we received two proposals; one from Harris Engineering of Denver CO. and the other from Utility Engineering of Minneapolis, MN. We had received calls from the other four potential firms prior to the proposal due date informing us they had decided not to submit a proposal due to current work load or related reasons. The two proposals were evaluated by staff and R.W. Beck. Basedon the the best value to proposal the determination was made that the Utility Engineering proposal P thing of the project scope, project staff e utility based on price, engineering hours, site and project strategies. RPU staff then performed a experience in similar projects, proximity due diligence visit to the Utility Engineering offices to review the firm's capabilities and quality xcept project mannagementvplan. Based on our review meanddiscussion experience,estaff t is deliverables programshich include the design confident that Utility Date G eral Manager I FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item# 6.a. Meeting Date: 6127106 Engineering has the qualifications necessary to successfully provide the engineering services that are required for a successful emissions reduction project. The proposal submitted by Utility Engineering is in the amount of $3,805,000 which is slightly below the estimate in the project budget. The proposal includes 32,500 engineering man-hours for the project as well as expenses and sub -contracted studies that are required. Activities that will take place in 2006 are budgeted in the approved 2006 Capital Budget. Staff is in the process of negotiating the terms and conditions as well as clarifying items that were identified in the proposal. Following mutual agreement on the terms, staff would like approval to execute the agreement with concurrence of the RPU General Manager and City Attorney. Attached is a comparative matrix as well as a letter of recommendation from the R.W. Beck engineer. Also included in the support documentation are pertinent sections of the Utility Engineering proposal. Staff will be at the Board meeting to make a presentation and to answer any questions on this request. UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the Board request the Common Council approve negotiating and executing a contract agreement with Utility Engineering to provide the profession engineering services for the engineering, design, contract procurement support, construction management, site engineering, commissioning and start up work for the Silver Lake Power Plant Unit 4 Emissions Reduction Project. The authorized not to exceed amount of this agreement would be $4,375,750 which includes a 15% contingency. General Manager Date FOR BOARD ACTION Agenda Item # 7. Meeting Date: 6127106 SUBJECT: Revisions to Traffic Signals Rate Tariff TS PREPARED BY: Bryan Blom, Manager of Finance &Accounting ITEM DESCRIPTION: The City of Rochester is in the process of changing the light source used in traffic signals from incandescent bulbs to LED's. This will reduce energy usage by about 90%. While RPU's current rate for traffic signals has just an energy charge, it is in reality recovering both fixed distribution system costs and variable energy costs. Since energy usage by traffic signals is constant, the energy -only rate was adequate to recover both fixed and variable costs. Now with the conversion to a much more energy efficient light, the current energy -only rate, if left as is, will no longer recover all the costs to serve traffic lights. Generally, all the traffic lights at an intersection are controlled by one traffic signal control cabinet regardless of the varying configuration of lights at different types of intersections. RPU provides service up to the control cabinet. The proposal is to have a monthly fixed charge of $23.00 per traffic signal control cabinet (based on a cost of service study allocation) and an energy charge for the calculated energy usage (these are not metered). With the addition of a monthly fixed charge the proposed energy rate is reduced 31% from 11.2870 to 7.788¢ per kilowatt-hour. While we could have continued the energy -only rate by increasing it greatly, the two-part rate better reflects true costs to serve these installations and allows for a gradual change -over to the LEDs. UTILITY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED: The Board is requested to approve the revisions to the Traffic Signals rate tariff effective July 4, 2006 and recommend City Council approval. Ge al Manager ate REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM LJO. 1 1 Consent Agenda Public Works D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Development Agreement — Hart Farm South PR PARED BY: M. Baker Arcon Development, Inc., is the Owner of real property in the City of Rochester commonly referred to as the Hart Farm South development. The Owner and City Staff have had discussions relating to the development of the property and proposed improvements to the surrounding infrastructure. Based on the discussions, the content for a Development Agreement has been decided and a document has been created. The major items covered in the Agreement include the following: • Transportation Improvement Obligations • Storm Water Management • Dedication of ROW • Dedication of Parkland requirements Pedestrian Facilities Owner's payment of the development related charges Staff recommends the Council approve the Development Agreement, which the Owner has already executed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Development Agreement with Arcon Development, Inc., for the Hart Farm South development COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7!5 06 .GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Agenda I Public Works �— ITEM DESCRIPTION: Development Agreement Release —A Portion of Maine Street PREPARED BY: Development M. Nigbur,�'" Maine Street Investors of Rochester LLP and Maine Street Development Company of Rochester LLC are developing property they own in Section 26 of Rochester Township in the 40th & 481h Street interchange area. This property is subject to the terms of the Maine Street Development Agreement. The Owners have requested that the Development Agreement be released for Lots 1, 2, 3 of Blockl; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 of Block 6; Outlots A, I, J of Maine Street Development as approved by the City Council. City staff is agreeable to the release of the Development Agreement subject to the following conditions which must be met as part of any Site Development Plan approval for these areas: 1. Payment of outstanding development charges for the release area 2. Site Development Plan Approval with the following provisions of the original Development Agreement being met including; • Section 3 — City Owner Contract — This is needed for any Public Improvements to be constructed. • Section 4 — Grading & Drainage - A grading plan and Drainage Report is required prior to any `final' grading for a specific site plan. • Section 11 — Real Estate Dedication — This requires the Owner to dedicate necessary land rights including easements, outlots, and outlines the provisions for conveyance. • Section 16 — Pedestrian Facilities — Owner is required to construct the necessary pedestrian facilities along the public roadways. • Section 18 — Landscape Maintenance — This requires the Owner to obtain a Revocable permit for any landscape features, lighting, signage, sprinklers which may be within any easements/right of way. • Section 21 — Permits — Owner is required to obtain all necessary permits for development and construction within the Property • Section 22 — Conditions of Approval — Owner is bound to adhere to any conditions approved by the City Council for the General Development Plan, Preliminary Plat, or Final Plat. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Release for Lots 1, 2, 3 of Blockl; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 of Block 6; Outlets A, I, J of Maine Street Development subject to satisfactory completion of the conditions noted above. COUNCIL ACTION: motion by: second by: to: MAINE STREET DEVELOPMENT L•` '•'�"_� ... _ . NMNE AVENUE 5_E..+ . 4 a ..........o r��__-Yx—. dAECIj tRW I .rem.... fiNNE Ti4. Y FH N?M�*, _i- r,. i_ MAINE STREET, DEVELOPMENT J voano. •r ^� �� x y t �� wZ4:^.^1° _��. I MAINEAi§lLVE.5.E Hoer I J•i 1 �� "-�-___ I l� eY tilt RECEIVED pry:l•-dPRre Ire Y: ids. t4i�RR.1ElvI� —_^- x!, l '�i']j f:riyR MNNET ET LYl M'Ni SHkI I'NO. for 1. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Consent Agenda Public Works hrfl fJ�)F� D_I� ITEM DESCRIPTION: Development Agreement Release —A Portion of Maine Street PREPARED BY: Development M. Nigbur Maine Street Investors of Rochester LLP and Maine Street Development Company of Rochester LLC are developing property they own in Section 26 of Rochester Township in the 40th & 48th Street interchange area. This property is subject to the terms of the Maine Street Development Agreement. The Owners have requested that the Development Agreement be released for Lots 1, 2, 3 of Blockl; Lots 6, 7, 8 of Block 5; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 of Block 6; Outlots A, I, J of Maine Street Development as approved by the City Council. City staff is agreeable to the release of the Development Agreement subject to the following conditions which must be met as part of any Site Development Plan approval for these areas: 1. Payment of outstanding development charges for the release area 2. Site Development Plan Approval with the following provisions of the original Development Agreement being met including; • Section 3 —City Owner Contract —This is needed for any Public Improvements to be constructed. • Section 4 — Grading & Drainage - A grading plan and Drainage Report is required prior to any `final' grading for a specific site plan. • Section 11 — Real Estate Dedication — This requires the Owner to dedicate necessary land rights including easements, outlots, and outlines the provisions for conveyance. • Section 16 —Pedestrian Facilities — Owner is required to construct the necessary pedestrian facilities along the public roadways. • Section 18 — Landscape Maintenance — This requires the Owner to obtain a Revocable permit for any landscape features, lighting, signage, sprinklers which may be within any easements/right of way. • Section 21 — Permits — Owner is required to obtain all necessary permits for development and construction within the Property • Section 22 — Conditions of Approval — Owner is bound to adhere to any conditions approved by the City Council for the General Development Plan, Preliminary Plat, or Final Plat. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Release for Lots 1, 2, 3 of Blockl; Lots 6, 7, 8 of Block 5; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 of Block 6; Outlots A, I, J of Maine Street Development subject to satisfactory completion of the conditions noted above. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to ...moms u rwr orarwr. MAINE STREET DEVELOPMENT Ak �_ MLH�In Ef�� Iq mr 5PA15PQ6Via'1aN a[[+41 !� W r 41 a� wo. $.5-qC. � y� 9 vF- � w F iti 5 i 9UiL"Ji T �=E t MA7ME AWAUE 5_E. a� a —MAKrr WYf L •^-7 SefLllFT3 MNfNE M EVF 0PWN7 1 MA � u z AVt � `•Y,rF =�ii'io6•:•• 1NE STREET DEVELOPMENT la �t .R£AiflT4 N.1_. I� uwwe Av�wuEs",F-�„„ .> s� r-� r.'axi M =HT 6] ��# t133HS335 • gg ( ---- 33S33 V n OlbW - i - ...._..... .. ..13NIVY0\ Z 3 W w TM I III `o \4 cV ' g to I' N IB I 1 a 'I q li g u O j Y; n i w a Z k tl I W Lu I� I '." W kCL i u� � I W 1 , C P W ao �$ I i „m �,° ➢ .y _,.-;�_ _..._ .`loll .: � LU LU al ❑ g�i I 1Li--Brea---- a I 1 1 � rn a •: � '< J � al j GCt[L .U,61bG E I I ~a..,--. V OV w � J I ''•. � � a W y Z Q_.___ _........ i.V. * pF Ei 'R' " ' �. ��•p' Syr . VFW, .lzAl.ic�__ �8ggnl,C� Cv d1y SE� S' �IIEZIIEI Ill IIt, Solt" MORMOM 66�666666666666�666�66686666 :3i rd :NDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of Bids: Hadley Valley I runK san Serve Sewer Service Area 29A Phase 2, J7744 itary Sewer to MEETING DATE: 7151 6 ITE :O:APREPARED J. Loehr Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., June 27, 2006 for the following local improvement project: City Project No: M2-42-2-05 J7744 Sanitary Sewer to Serve Sewer Service Area 29A Phase 2." "Hadley valley Trunk The following bids were received: Base Bid Alternate Bid Base + Alternate A-1 Excavating $3,167,770.73 $135,029.30 $3,302,800.03 Low Bid SJ Louis $3,625,151.65 $4,215,969.50 $106,213.05 $142,319.95 $3,731,364.70 $4,358,289.45 Barbarossa & Sons Lametti & Sons $4,227,276.40 $135,521.00 $4,362,797.40 Elcor Construction $4,278,054.43 $ 68,449.75 $4,346,504.18 Engineer Estimate $3,611,256.30 $114,077.00 $3,725,333.30 The Hadley Valley Phase 2 project is included in the 2006 - 2011 Capital Budget, Sewer and Water, Page 60, Item No. 8. The project is necessary to provide sanitary sewer to the Hadley Valley sewer service area. The project also includes drainage improvements in the East River Road NE area. The Department of Public Works recommends that the contract be awarded to A-1 Excavating for the Base Bid plus the Alternate Bid. The Alternate Bid includes drainage improvements along the north line of RPU's property. The project is proposed to be funded by SAC Revenue Bonds to be issued later in 2006 and from the Stormwater Utility. The Feasibility Report adopted by the City Council on August 1, 2005 requires that the developers/owners of property within Hadley Valley representing at least 50% of the estimated project cost for each respective Phase must enter into Contribution Agreements with the City prior to the award of contract for the project. As of June 28, 2006 the City has not received any signed Contribution Agreements from the developers/property owners within the Hadley Valley area. In the event Contribution Agreements are not received prior to the July 5, 2006 City Council meeting the Department of Public Works recommends that the award of contract be withdrawn. The bids are good until August 26, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. If the Council wishes to proceed a resolution could be adopted awarding the contract to A-1 Excavating for the Base Bid plus the Alternate Bid. Attachment: Location Map Budget and Assessment Schedule COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second to: 1 g�low z 0 < i r � � o V � ad� B M OWiAYIHN 8I •Y y. OM Y91AVISig iq 4Y 4 Y JUJ ]j 6 m • Y� k p ?Y'i'x� ffi Y� �h .. m 5 a�ae$d -lilt s-'e��aaa 3G85 � g�® ?C 3a i4INHIH m e I�II��I��,Nl�nll�i�t�i°�fNe{°�f�•■°��!"I III Oar eai •.8��.�0'e S e i Z k k b°i >pggS 4� g"hit "d liiYy «i: wuJ ill &l3 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 5, 2006 TO: Steve Kvenvold, Dennis Hanson FROM: Michael Nigburfy//�1 RE: Bids for Hadley Valley Sewer — Item D - 18 CC: At the present time the City has not received any contribution agreements for repayment of a portion of the cost for the sanitary sewer trunkline to serve Hadley Valley as required by the Feasibility Study and City Policy. Staff would like this item removed from the agenda with the understanding that Staff will have this item brought back to the Council after receipt of appropriate agreements. ROCHESTER PUBLIC WORKS DEPART;4I ENT LAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1' DATE: 7 106 GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM O. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works O -0 I ITEM DESCRIPTION: Revocable Permit: Mayo Clinic Rochester — provements within PREPARED BY: Right of Way adjacent to Methodist Hospital. 1.)( M. Nigbur-4W Mayo Clinic Rochester (Mayo) has requested a Revocable Permit for the installation of snow melting equipment in the right of way of 3rd Avenue NW. Mayo would also like to place a canopy and a pedestrian ramp within the right of way of Center Street West adjacent to Methodist Hospital (Lots 38 and 39, Original Plat to the City of Rochester). The snow melting equipment will be installed underneath the sidewalk adjacent to 3rd Avenue NW adjacent to the subject. The City will install the snow melting equipment as part of roadway project J-7210 - Reconstruct 3rd Ave NW from Center St to 2nd St NW. Mayo will then complete the operations and implementation of the snow melt equipment. The canopy will be placed a minimum of 9 feet above sidewalk elevation adjacent to the building on the subject property and will extend 3 feet into the public right of way of the north side of Center Street West adjacent to the subject property. The 10-foot wide pedestrian ramp will be constructed in the public right of way of the North side of Center Street West. Mayo will be responsible for the installation of the canopy and pedestrian ramp. Mayo shall bear the cost to install, maintain and repair all of the improvements listed. Staff has reviewed the request and would recommend in favor of granting a Revocable Permit. Mayo has executed a Revocable Permit which includes the standard language for revocation and liability protection for the City. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Revocable Permit with Mayo Clinic Rochester to allow the installation of snow melting equipment, a canopy and a pedestrian ramp within the right of way adjacent to Methodist COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 07 5 6 3ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM No. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works Z)— ITEM DESCRIPTION: AWARD OF BID: (J7210) PREPARED BY: 3rtl Avenue NW from Center Street to 2"d Street NW / D. Nel n �J' Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., June 16, 2006 for the following local improvement: Proiect: City No. 6303-4-D4 (J721 D) S.A.P. 159-108-06 Reconstruct 3`d Avenue NW from Center Street to 2nd Street NW Proiect Background: The project consists of reconstructing 3 d Avenue NW a concrete street from Center Street to 2"d Street NW. Work will include: new concrete pavement, new sidewalks, curb and gutter, signal system modifications, and rehabilitation of storm sewer. This project is included in the 2006 -2011 Capital Improvement Program, item #10, page 34. Funding for the project has been formalized in executed Contribution Agreements with abutting property owners; Mayo Foundation and Kahler Hotels. The following bids were received: Total Bid 1. Road Constructors, Inc. $ 599,156.78 2. Elcor Construction $ 740,373.82 3. Blitz Construction $ 755,330.70 Engineers Estimate $ 951,736.00 Proiect Recommendation: The Public Works Department recommends the City Council proceed with an award to the low bidder. In the event the Contribution Agreements from Mayo Foundation and Kahler Hotels (Sunstone) have not been executed and received prior to the July 5, 2006 City Council meeting the Public Works Department recommends that the award of contract be withdrawn. The bids are good until July 16, 2006. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution awarding the contract, (J7210) Reconstruction of 3`d Avenue NW from Center Street to 2"d Street NW to Road Constructors, Inc. COUNCIL ACTION: Motonby: second by. to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION GENDA SECTION: Consent I ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: Professional Services Agreement to Continue Nondegradation Analysis — Phase 2 MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 ITEM NO. 2t PARED BY: B. Huberty Minnesota rules require permittees who submit an application for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permit must complete a nondegradation analysis. The new Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requires that 30 Selected MS4s complete a nondegradation analysis to determine how past growth (1988 to the present) and expected growth (present to 2020) have increased or will increase storm water flows and pollutant loads. In February 2006, the City selected Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates (BRAA) to initiate Phase I of this complex requirement. BRAA has gathered, reviewed and assessed existing information needed to model the specified changes in storm water flows and pollutant loads. They have also appropriate methodology to determine infiltration potential to address increased storm water volumes. The City is now ready to move into Phase 2: the Loading Assessment. During this Phase, the Consultant will fill critical data gaps and proceed with modeling the specified time periods to determine changes in storm water flows and pollutant loads. They will also evaluate the efficacy of our existing BMPs to offset those increases. (The third and final phase will encompass completing the Nondegradation Report and MPCA Submittals.) COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Professional Services Agreement Amendment 41 with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to complete Phase 2 of the nondegradation analysis for a lump sum amount of $121,285, with funding from the Storm Water Utility. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by Second by: to: GENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works MEETING DATE: 07/05/06 ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract— Public Improvements to Serve the Opus 3`d Ili PREPARED BY: Building (Mayo Project #23217) 4th Ave SW & St SW —J5239 M. Baker AA3 Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: Mayo Clinic Rochester (Owner) & Knutson Construction, Inc. (Contractor) are requesting a City -Owner Contract J5239 consisting of "Public Improvements to Serve the Opus Building (Mayo Project #23217) 41h Ave SW & 3,d St SW". COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J5239, "Public Improvements to Serve the Opus Building (Mayo Project #23217) 4'h Ave SW & 3`d St SW". COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 1 DATE: 07/05/06 3ENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: I ITEM. NO._ , CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract — Public Storm Sewer Relocation to Serve Kemps PREPARED BY: (North Broadway) —J5240 M. Baker Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: Kemps LLC (Owner) & Fraser Construction, Inc. (Contractor) are requesting a City -Owner Contract J5240 consisting of "Public Storm Sewer Relocation to Serve Kemps (North Broadway)". COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J5240, "Public Storm Sewer Relocation to Serve Kemps (North Broadway)". COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Semnd by: to: 3ENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works / MEETING _ ^t1 DATE: 07/05/06 ITEM NO. t�-.:)-4 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Owner Contract— Public Improvements to Serve Scenic Oaks PREPARED BY: Sixth Addition (excluding Outlot'A') — J5203 M. Baker t Staff would offer the following Owner Contract project for consideration by the Council: Hanson & Younge LLC (Owner) & Griffin Construction Co., LLP (Contractor) are requesting a City - Owner Contract J5203 consisting of "Public Improvements to Serve Scenic Oaks Sixth Addition (cvch Ainn ntAlot'A') COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the City / Owner Contract for J5203, "Public Improvements to Serve Scenic Oaks Sixth Addition (excluding Outlot'A')". COUNCIL ACTION: Moclon by: Second by: to: 3ENDA SECTION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consent Agenda First Supplemental The Wilds REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 715106 to ORIGINATING DEPT: Public Works ITEM NO. for p PARED BY: s.y M. Baker Todd and Patricia Fiedler are the Owners of real property in the City of Rochester platted as The Wilds. The Owners and City entered into a Development Agreement that was recorded in the office of the Olmsted County Recorder as Document #A-1052060, on or about January 28, 2005. An amended Development Agreement was needed to address ownership & maintenance of the Outlots within the development. Staff recommends the Council approve the First Supplemental Amended Development Agreement, which the Owners have already executed. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the First Supplemental Amended Development Agreement with Todd and Patricia Fiedler, for The Wilds. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by to: .. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7-5-06 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT AGENDA ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Public Works I 'D-ZIP ITEM DESCRIPTION: Change to Two -Way Traffic, W Center St, 15 St NW and 2 no St PREPARED BY: NW, from 6`h Ave SW to 16" Ave SW; Kutzky Park Neighborhood D. Nelson 2oo Street NW, 1 t Street NW and W Center St in the Kutzky Park neighborhood are one-way streets. It is believed that this traffic pattern was set up, prior to the construction of Civic Center Drive, to facilitate traffic flow through the neighborhood into and out of downtown. One-way traffic eliminates the conflict from oncoming vehicles, and is conducive to higher speeds and higher volumes. The Kutzky Park Neighborhood Association and the Imagine Kutzky initiative have been exploring number of issues including ways to slow the traffic through the neighborhood. Reverting one-way streets to two-way streets has been used in other cities as an effective traffic calming tool. 1st St SW was changed to two-way traffic on October 6, 2005 as a trial prior to converting the other three streets to two-way. Traffic volume and speed data collected before and after the change show a 20-40 % reduction in volume after the change to two-way. The results of the speed data are mixed, with some data showing a several MPH drop in speeds, and some data showing speeds approximately the same as when the street was one-way. Over the last several years numerous neighborhood meetings have been held regarding this and other neighborhood issues. The conversion to two-way was the main topic of a neighborhood meeting on June 13, 2006; the neighborhood association mailed notice of the meeting to all neighborhood residents. At the meeting some residents expressed concern with the unknown outcome of changing to two-way traffic. Some indicated they were in favor of the change. No one was present from 15' St SW to ask that 1s' St SW be changed back to one-way. In a straw pole of the 60+ present, 7 indicated to leave the streets as they are, and 36 indicated to try the two-way traffic for two years with the understanding that if it proves to be a detriment to the neighborhood it could be changed back. Additionally, the stop sign pattern in the Kutzky Park neighborhood is set up for free -flow east -west traffic from 161h Ave to 11`h Ave, and from 111h Ave to 61h Ave; this also contributes to higher speed east - west traffic through the neighborhood. North -south traffic within the neighborhood stops every block. Concurrent with the changes to two-way traffic, six intersections within the neighborhood would have their stop signs reversed to create more of a "basket weave" of stop signs, where both north -south and east -west drivers stop every two blocks. The intersections include 2no St NW at 13`h Ave & 71h Ave; I" St NW at 12`h Ave & 91h Ave; and W Center St at 131h Ave & 71h Ave. No changes in on -street parking restrictions are proposed at this time. Any on -street parking issues would be brought forward separately at a later time. Funding for the signage and signal changes to revert the three streets to two-way was approved in the CIP with funding from tax levy. Neighborhood residents would not be assessed any of the cost. At the June 23, 2006 Committee of the Whole meeting, Public Works presented neighborhood and City goals that would try to be achieved with this change from one-way to two-way streets: Goal 1: Reduce the volume of "cut through" traffic in the Kutzky Park Neighborhood Goal 2: Reduce the 85`h percentile vehicle speed in the KPN Goal 3: Reduce, to the extent practical, the number and severity of pedestrian / vehicle and vehicle / vehicle accidents in KPN r In addition, Public Works suggested the following criteria be used as the basis for evaluations and subsequent decisions in 2 years on whether the conversion of these streets from 1-way to 2-way streets met the neighborhood's and city's objectives. It is understood that the neighborhood's and city's goals will not have been met if all of the following result directly from the conversion of the neighborhood streets from one-way to two-way streets. Criteria 1: A measurable (> 5%) increase in the total volume of traffic within the KPN as measured in average daily traffic (ADT) at eight locations. These measurements will not include traffic volumes on 11th Avenue, 2"d Street SW, 6th Avenue or 16th Avenue. Criteria 2: A measurable (> 5% = 2 MPH) increase in the average 85th percentile speed within the KPN as measured at eight locations. These measurements will not include traffic speeds on 11`n Avenue, 2nd Street SW, 6th Avenue or 16th Avenue. Criteria 3: A measurable (> 5%) increase in the number of vehicle / pedestrian and vehicle / vehicle traffic accidents within the KPN. These measurements will not include accidents on 11`h Avenue, 2nd Street SW, 6th Avenue or 161h Avenue or accidents at intersection of neighborhood streets with 11th Avenue, 2nd Street SW, 6th Avenue or 161hAvenue. Public Works will determine if sufficient "before data: exists or needs to be collected before the conversion this summer of the remaining 3 streets from one-way to two-way streets. The City will collect "after data" during the summer of 2008 for the purposes of comparing and evaluating it against the "before data" to determine whether the conversion of the one-way streets met the neighborhood's and City's objectives. Public Works staff further recommends that If the neighborhood's and city's objectives have been met after review of the "before" and "after' data and the KPNA formally requests any or all of the two-way streets changed back to one-way streets and the City Council approves the KPNA request, then the KPNA will be responsible for all signing and signal costs incurred by the City to make the approved change back to one-way street(s). COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Delete paragraphs 1, 2, and 4 of Section G "One -Way Streets and Alleys" of the Comprehensive Traffic and Parking Resolution. 2. Approve the conversion of the existing one-way streets within KPN to two-way streets and the expenses necessary to carry out this conversion. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: "'""' y' to: shy - Page i of t Schneider, Eileen 'rom: depmanbe@charter.net ient: Saturday, July 01, 2006 3:42 PM To: City Hall Subject: Message From www.rochestermn.gov A message has been sent to you from the City of Rochester website. Contact Information Name: Barbara Depman Address: 1001 Second St. NW City: Rochester State: Minnesota Zip: 55901 Phone: 507-285-0980 Email: depmanbe@charter.net Question/Comment I'm writing using this form in order to address the entire council at once. I live in Kutzky Park and am in favor of, at the very least , a trial run of 2-way streets. There are a number of reasons, all of which you have heard, but the bottom line is that we are a neighborhood primarily and the residents have the right to make access easier for themselves and to keep commuting through -traffic to a minimum. Please do vote to approve it --there has been much deliberation and research put into this; it is not an impulsive proposal. —. ank you for your consideration. Barbara Depman 7/3/2006 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7117/06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works D_,�7 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contribution Agreement — Sunstone Kahler, LLC - Reconstruction PREPARED BY: of 3'd Ave NW between Center St W and 2"d St NW and M. Nigbur Reconstruction of 2 Av SW from Center St W to 1 St SW Staff would offer the following Contribution Agreement for consideration by the Council: Sunstone Kahler, LLC (Kahler) is the owner of two real properties generally described as parts of Blocks 31, 40 and 41, Original Plat to the City of Rochester. One property is adjacent to the area of 3`d Avenue NW being reconstructed as part of City project number J-7210. The other property is adjacent to the area of 2nd Avenue SW being reconstructed as part of City project number J-7747. Kahler has requested to make contributions for the improvements of both projects as follows: 3`d Avenue NW Project: • Public Improvements — Kahler will pay 23.3% of the cost (based on privately owned frontage along the project) of the cost of reconstructing 3`d Avenue NW. This cost shall include''/t of each intersection reconstructed. The estimate for the public work is $127,530.60. • Private Improvements — Kahler will pay the cost of private work items requested by Kahler including''/2 of the cost of concrete sidewalk (the remaining''/2 of the cost will be paid by the Tax Abatement Fund). The estimate for the private work is $8,473.00. 2"d Avenue SW Project: • Public Improvements — Kahler will pay $37,692.00 as their cost (based on privately owned frontage along the project) for the reconstruction of 2"d Avenue SW. • Private Improvements — Kahler will pay the cost of private work items requested by Kahler including''/x of the cost of concrete sidewalk (the remaining'/S of the cost will be paid by the Tax Abatement Fund). The estimate for the private work is $12,344.03. Kahler will grant any necessary temporary construction easements at no charge. Kahler shall have no further obligation for costs incurred with the initial reconstruction of 3 d Avenue NW (J-7210) or the initial reconstruction of 2"d Avenue SW (J-7747). Subseauent Droiects involving street improvements may require contributions from Kahler. 2 METHODIST. _....__ SUNSTONE KAHLER LLC i i 9 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: CENTER ST W SUNSTON KAHLER LL Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Contribution Agreement with Sunstone Kahler, LLC. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/17/06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. CONSENT AGENDA Public Works j) -2-8 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contribution Agreement — Reconstruction of 3 Avenue NW PREPARED BY: between Center Street W and 2nd Street NW — Mayo Clinic M. Nigbul�j Rochester properties // Staff would offer the following Contribution Agreement for consideration by the Council: Mayo Clinic Rochester (Mayo) is the owner of real property generally described as Blocks 30, 38 and 39, Original Plat to the City of Rochester. This property is adjacent to the area of 3 d Avenue NW being reconstructed as part of City project number J-7210. Mayo has requested to make contributions for the improvements to 3`d Avenue NW as follows: • Public Improvements — Mayo will pay 76.6% of the cost (based on privately owned frontage along the project) of the cost of reconstructing 3" Avenue NW. This cost shall include'/] of each intersection reconstructed. The estimate for the public work is $418,255.34. • Private Improvements — Mayo will pay the cost of private work items requested by Mayo including 100% of the snowmelt deicing system and % of the cost of concrete sidewalk (the remaining '/2 of the cost will be paid by the Tax Abatement Fund). The estimate for the private work is $100,139.50. Mayo will grant any necessary temporary construction easements at no charge. The Owner shall have no further obligation for costs incurred with the initial reconstruction of 3rd Avenue NW (J-7210). Subsequent projects involving street improvements may require contributions from the Owner. 35T NW 287 NW C EN TEN ST W f 1 I COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: 29T NE tt1 Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Contribution Agreement with Mayo Clinic COUNCIL Motion Second M REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7-5-06 kGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: .' PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING TPREPARED ITEM DESCRIPTION: Zoning District amendment #06-04 by Badger Hills, LLC to BY: rezone approximately 12.04 acres. The applicant requests a rezoning . Baker, from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to the R-1 (Mixed Single Family) Senior Planner District. The property is located north of Valleyhigh Dr., NW and west of West Circle Dr., NW within the Badger Hills subdivision. June 27, 2006 City Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 14, 2006, to consider this petition. Mr. McGuine moved to recommend approval, with staff findings; Mr. Ohly seconded. The motion carried 6-0. Council Action Needed: The Council should direct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact reflecting the Councils decision on this zone change. If the Council approves this zone change as petitioned, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance that can be adopted supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law to amend the Zoning for the property. Distribution: 1. City Administrator 2. City Attorney: Legal Description attached 3. Planning Department File 4. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on WEDNESDAY July 5, 2006 in the Council/Board Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street SE. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion By: Seconded By: Action: | |,|•� .Ro N s . ,|;}i OTA G� � o� »mom w � m-§$(� � y� 2 $§ � ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMEN-17 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 • Rochester, MN 55904-4744 C D U N T T OF www.olmstedcounty.com/pianning City Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner DATE: June 6, 2006 RE: Zoning District amendment #06-04 by Badger Hills, LLC to rezone approximately 12.04 acres. The applicant requests a rezoning from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to the R-1 (Mixed Single Family) District. The property is located north of Valleyhigh Dr., NW and west of West Circle Dr., NW within the Badger Hills subdivision. Plannina Department Review: Petitioner: Badger Development 11, LLC 4057 28`h Street NW, Suite 20D Rochester, MN 55901 Consultant: Yaggy Colby Associates 717 Third Ave SE Rochester, MN 55904 Size and Location: The property is located north of Valieyhigh Drive and west of Kenosha Drive NW and includes approximately 12.04 acres of land. Existing Land Use: The property is currently undeveloped. Proposed Use: The application is to re -zone the property from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) District to the R-1 (Mixed Single Family District). Uses would be those permitted in the R-1 District. Adjacent Land Use and Property to the west is not currently annexed to the City and is Zoning: designated for low density residential uses on the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan. Properties to the north, south and east are part of the Badger Hills development and are zoned R-2 (Low Density Residential). Transportation Access: Access to this property will be from Valleyhigh Road NW, via Kenosha Drive NW. Wetlands: There do not appear to be hydric soils on this property. Referral Comments: 1. Wetlands LGU, John Harford Report Attachments: 1. Location & Area Zoning Map 2. Referral Comments BUILDING CODE 507/285-8345 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 507/285-8232 - HOUSINGMRA 507/285-8224 PLANNING20NING 507/285-8232 • WELUSEPTIC 5071285-8345 FAX 5071287-2275 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 'No Page 2 June 7, 2006 Analysis for Zoning District Amendment: Under the provisions of Paragraph 60.33E of the Rochester Land Development Manual, the Commission shall recommend for approval and the Council shall approve, an application requesting an amendment to the zoning map if the amendment satisfies the following criteria: 1) The criteria of this subdivision apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by formal petition. An amendment need only satisfy one of the following criteria: a) The area, as presently zoned, is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan; b) The area was originally zoned erroneously due to a technical or administrative error; c) While both the present and proposed zoning districts are consistent with the Plan, the proposed district better furthers the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan as found in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan, Chapter 3 of the Housing Plan, and Chapter 10 of the ROCOG Long Range Transportation Plan; or d) The area has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to rezone so as to encourage development or redevelopment of the area. Proposed R-1: Re -zoning 12.04 acres of this property to the R-1 District is consistent with the Rochester Urban Service Area Land Use Plan designation of low density residential' for this property. The applicant intends to develop consistent with the R-1 standards and wishes to downzone the property to more accurately reflect this intent. 2) The criteria of this subdivision also apply to those amendments to the zoning map filed by formal petition. However, an amendment must satisfy all of the following criteria: a) the permitted uses allowed within the proposed zoning district will be appropriate on the subject property and compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood; and Proposed R-1: The permitted uses allowed in the R-1 district wili be appropriate on the property and compatible with adjacent properties and the neighborhood. b) the proposed amendment does not involve spot zoning. (Spot Zoning involves the reclassification of a single lot or several small lots to a district which is different than that assigned to surrounding properties, for reasons inconsistent with the purposes set forth in this ordinance, the state enabling legislation, or the decisions of courts in this state). Proposed R-1: Rezoning 1.12 acre to the R-1 zoning district would not be considered spot zoning. Staff Recommendation: Findings can be made to support rezoning this property from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) district to the R-1 (Mixed Single Family) district. Staff recommends approval of this petition. WETLAND COMNMNTS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS LLC Application Number: Zoning District amendment #06-04 by Badger Hills, No hydric soils exist on the site based on the Soil Survey Hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and submitting the information as part of this application. A wetland delineation has been carried out for the property and is on file with the Planning Department. A wetland delineation is on file with the Planning Department and a No -Loss, Exemption, or Replacement Plan has been submitted to the Planning Department. ® A wetland related application has been approved by the City. This plan incorporates the approved wetland plan. No hydric soils exist on the property based on the Soil Survey. However, due to the location in the landscape, the property owner should examine the site for wetlands. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands. 1-1 Other or Explanation: From John Harford Wetlands LGU Representative 0 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF ROCHESTER PLANNING COMMISSION 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE SE —SUITE 100 ROCHESTER MN 55904 Minutes adareguiariy scheduled meeting of the City Planning and Zoning C on We nesy, June 14, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council/Board Chambers of the Center, 1 4th Street SE, Rochester, MN. Members Pre nt: Mr. Jay Burke, Chair; Mr. Jesse Wallace; Mr. Paul Ohly; Haeussinger; Mr. hn McGuine; and Mr. Gerald Pestka Members Absent: Ms>Baker as, Vice Chair; Ms. Lisa Wiesner and r. Vince Barry r' Staff Present: Ms. Mitd Ms. Stephanie Foster Other City Staff Preset Alf son, City Attorney SET ORDER OF AGENDA: Mr. Haeussinger moved to approve the motion. The motion carried unanimous CONSENT AGENDA: Mr. McGuine made a motion , aF seconded the motion. May 24, 20 minutes The moti carried unanimously. Mr. Pestka seconded the the following consent iis. Mr. Haeussinger zoning District amendment #06-04 by Badger Hills LLC to rezone approximately 12,04 acres The applicant requests a rezoning from the R-2 (Low Density Residential) to the R 1 (Mixed Single Family) District The property is located north of Valleyhsgh Dr., NW and west of West Circle Dr NW within the Badger Hills subdivision. Ms. Baker presented the staff report dated June 6, 2006 to the Commission. A copy of the report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department. Due to technical failure there was not an overhead version of the map for the Commissioners and the public to view. Mr. Burke opened the public hearing. Ms. Vicki Jane Anderson residing at (3735 Kenosha DR NW Rochester, MN) addressed the Commission. She asked what kind of homes would be built in the area. Ms. Baker replied single-family homes. i Page 2 City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Hearing Date: June 14, 2006 Ms. Anderson asked if town homes would be allowed. Ms. Baker replied no, the re -zoning to R-1 eliminates that option. Ms. Anderson asked what would be the time -line for the development. Ms. Baker replied that there is no known time -line for the project. Mr. Haeussinger replied that many factors would predict the total time -line of the development. Ms. Baker stated to Ms. Anderson that the City Council would hear the issue next. With no one else wishing to be heard, Mr. Burke closed the public hearing. Mr. Haeussinger asked if the acreage should be changed to 12.04 in the findings on page 20 of the staff report. Ms. Baker replied yes. M Ms. Baker pre;hqted the staff report dated June 6, 2006 to th ommission. A copy of the report is on file at Rochester -Olmsted Planning Depa ent. Mr. Burke asked if this wo be the only applica ' for the bridge, being that it straddles the property line. Ms. Baker replied that the bridge do of straddle the property line. She corrected where the bridge would be constructed. Mr. Kyle Skog of (Masse rvey Engineering) a ressed the Commission. He stated that he would be available to and on any issues. Mr. Burke aske'�4they are in agreement with staff Mr. Skog^plied yes. no one wishing to be heard, Mr. Burke closed the public hearing. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING 7-5-06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. PUBLIC H —ASUNG PLA_?�NING �� ITEM DESCRIPTION: Final Plat #05-24, to be known as Scenic Oaks Sixth Addition, by R & PREPARED BY: M Development Co. The applicant is proposing to subdivide approximately 40.33 acres Mitzi A. Baker, of land, previously platted as Outlot B Scenic Oaks Fifth Addition, into 30 single family Senior Planner lots and one Outlot. The Plat will also dedicate right-of-way for the extension of Scenic View Drive SW, as weld as two other roadways. The property is located west of Scenic Oak Drive SW and south of 481° Street SW. June 29, 2006 Staff has reviewed this final plat for compliance with the applicable regulations and recommends approval subject to the following conditions/modifications: 1. Prior to recording the final plat documents, the applicant shall pay the E911 Addressing and GIS Impact fees, as outlined in the June 19, 2006 letter from the Rochester Olmsted Planning Department GIS/Addressing division. 2. The applicant agrees that this subdivision will have an impact on the need for Parkland and that the dedication requirements will be met as stated in the June 26, 2006 memorandum from Rochester Park and Recreation via a reduction in previously established credits. 3. Any areas of this subdivision that do not drain to an existing privately constructed detention facility, previously approved to serve this Property and meeting current design standards, are subject to participation in the City's Storm Water Management Plan. 4. Construction of pedestrian facilities is required, at the Owner's expense, along the entire frontages of both sides of all public streets within this subdivision. 5. No parking shall be allowed on the north side of Britwood Lane SW, from Scenic View Drive SW to (but not including) the cul-de-sac bulb and shall be posted "No Parking". 6. Dedication of an applicable temporary easement and construction of a temporary turn -around is required at the Northerly extent of Scenic View Drive SW. Council Action Needed. 1. If the Council wishes to proceed, 'it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution with findings -supporting their decision. Distribution: 1. City Attorney 2. Planning Department File 3. Applicant: This item will be considered sometime after 7:00 p.m. on WEDNESDAY July 5, 2006, in the Council/Board Chambers at the Government Center, 151 4th Street SE, L 11 � � -",OUNCIL ACTION: motion by second by: to: 2 R\ i r VICINITY MAP „ 1 YID 8U1C 3 0 2 .0 ° BIDCK a NEB"St K•E „ ifl Z 3 4 1 �D i�] o� T ' 4 ' S pp•-inrt^ i"eI C i 8 14 =' w' 'b. 4 p FI 2 jt`2 -ZO'% 2 s 0 13 i e y a _+'_raAl �' 11 t"hor ]z lle, f 1omY : x� $[$g x -r '�-� tt 'rn ¢ I I awt y°1t t� 8,r H �[ O C K 4 'r rer r g[ 33 O ?'eq 1 16 .� 3 d ri'ilfx' $ 5t46 E 369.1' 3 L 0 CK t l IS 8 19 10 8 8 ) 8 1 4 a _wac p i Sj Eg 3 2 8 L 0 ♦ � _ . £' ii �+ 18 18 14 13 3 36 l"� ?? � i 1P BLOCK 3 - tq�y pp I 1' 6Z Y UNPLATTED -� I f18_ S� ��._ .B. rn Et CB"_ F". €3 _ Ti `E; °_e"`F .f eft ' EI �¢�;,E gg ,,§' eeegs egtI :a°;n f._`Fbg ? ff3 ! ( p3F$ f g' $ t? 1 °JIge;i�s ¢�� FI Or- Es §ee•�a_a. E 8� 1 aEe I i Is eg aE i r age eR. nl E-seE S •a zi; I e.zs 36E 8: s Ell.g ( 1 g $= ip 4�• , STEi f€! t LE[t it sE Sill —y o e EE HSIEe ] as es' � FA ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 - Rochester, MN 559D4-4744 .a,,,,T,, 0i www.olmstedcounty.00mlplanning TO: Rochester Common Council FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner DATE: June 29, 2006 RE: Final Plat #05-24, to be known as Scenic Oaks Sixth Addition, by R & M Development Co. The applicant is proposing to subdivide approximately 40.33 acres of land, previously platted as Outlot B Scenic Oaks Fifth Addition, into 30 single family lots and one outlot. The Plat will also dedicate right-of-way for the extension of Scenic View Drive SW, as weld as two other roadways. The property is located west of Scenic Oak Drive SW and south of 48th Street SW. Planning Department Review: ApplicanVOwner: Surveyors/Engineers Report Attachments: Plat Data: R & M Development Co. 5322 Scenic Oak Drive SW Rochester, MN 55902 GGG Inc. 14070 Hwy 52 SE Chatfield, MN 55923 1. Referral Comments 2. Location Map 3. Copy of Final Plat Location of Property: The property is located south of Scenic Point Drive SW and allows for the continuation of Scenic View Drive SW. Zoning: The property is zoned R-1 (Mixed Single Family) district on the City of Rochester Zoning Map. Proposed Development: The applicant is proposing to subdivide approximately 40.33 acres into 30 lots for single family residential development and 2 outlots. Outlot A will be subdivided in the future for additional single family residential development. Outlot B will provide a pedestrian connection to the west once the property develops. Wetlands: The Soil Survey and National Wetland Indicator maps were reviewed for the presence of wetlands. No hydric soils exist on the property based on the Soil Survey. BUILDING CODE 507/285-8345 - GISIADDRESSING/MAPPING 5071285-6232 - HOUSINGIHRA 507/285-8224 PLANNINGIZONING 507/285-6232 - WELLISEPTIC 507/285-8345 FAX 507/287-2275 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER ..m.w Page 2 a / June 29, 2006 Streets: This plat dedicates right-of-way for public roadways. The first roadway is labeled as Scenic View Drive SW. This roadway is designed as a 36 foot wide driving surface on 60 feet of right-of-way. This roadway is loop roadway with two accesses off of 481" Street SW. The second roadway is labeled as Britwood Lane SW. This roadway is designed as a 28 foot driving surface on 50 feet of right-of-way and ends as a cul-de-sac. The third roadway dedicated on the plat, is labeled as Reservoir Drive SW. This roadway will continue southerly to serve the future development to the south (Scenic Oaks Lakeview). The right-of-way being dedicated is 60 feet in width and roadway will have a driving surface of 36 feet. Street less than 32 feet in width will need to be posted "No Parking" on one side of the street. Streets less than 26 feet in width will need to be posted "No Parking on both side of the street. Removal of TreesfBrush: The applicant disclosed an intent to use burning on site to dispose of trees, slash and brush. Parkland Dedication: The Park and Recreation recommends that dedication requirements will be met as stated in the June 26, 2006 memorandum from Rochester Park and Recreation via a reduction in previously established credits. Preliminary Plat; The City Council approved the preliminary plat and substantial land alteration for this property on August 1, 2005 subject to the following 7 conditions: 1. The applicant agrees that this subdivision will have an impact on the need for Parkland and that the dedication requirements are outlined in the memorandum from the Park and Recreation Department dated June 23, 2005, 2. Grading and Drainage Plan approval is required prior to submitting the Final Plat. Any areas of this subdivision that do not drain to an existing privately constructed detention facility, previously approved to serve this Property and meeting current design standards, are subject to participation in the City's Storm Water Management Plan. 3. Construction of pedestrian facilities is required, at the Owner's expense, along the entire frontages of both sides of all public streets within this subdivision. 4. No parking shall be allowed on the north side of Britwood Lane SVV, from Scenic View Drive SW to (but not including) the cul-de-sac bulb and shall be posted No Parking" 5. Dedication of an applicable temporary easement and construction of a temporary turn -around is required at the Northerly extent of Scenic View Drive SW. Page 3 June 29, 2006 6. The 181'storm sewer discharge on the easterly edge of Lot 3, Block 3 shall be extended down to the water waters edge rather than discharging at the top of the slope. The Park Department will provide the applicant with a permit to access the reservoir site for purposes of extending the pipe. 7. The applicant shall provide surety that guarantees the site will be fully restored after the completion of the excavation activity. Said surety must be provided prior to commencement of grading activities on the property. Planning Staff Recommendation: Staff would recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to recording the final plat documents, the applicant shall pay the E911 Addressing and GIS impact fees, as outlined in the June 19, 2006 letter from the Rochester Olmsted Planning Department GiS/Addressing division. 2. The applicant agrees that this subdivision will have an impact on the need for Parkland and that the dedication requirements will be met as stated in the June 26, 2006 memorandum from Rochester Park and Recreation via a reduction in previously established credits. 3. Any areas of this subdivision that do not drain to an existing privately constructed detention facility, previously approved to serve this Property and meeting current design standards, are subject to participation in the City`s Storm Water Management Plan. 4. Construction of pedestrian facilities is required, at the Owner's expense, along the entire frontages of both sides of all public streets within this subdivision. 5. No parking shall be allowed on the north side of Britwood Lane SW, from Scenic View Drive SW to (but not including) the cul-de-sac bulb and shalt be posted "No Parking". 6. Dedication of an applicable temporary easement and construction of a temporary turn -around is required at the Northerly extent of Scenic View Drive SW. oe ,ttti-g Kec�n ROCHESTER PARK AND RECREATION Ro°nester, Fm DEPARTMENT DATE: June 26, 2006 TO: Jennifer Garness Planning RE: Scenic Oaks 61h Final Plat #05-24 Acreage of plat.......................................................... 40.33 a Number of dwelling units ............................................. 30 units Densityfactor........................................................... .0244 Dedication............................................................... 0.73 a Fair market value of land ............................................. na The Park and Recreation Department recommends that dedication requirements be met via: Reduction in Phreviously established credits as a result of dedication of 6.2 acre Outlot A Scenic Oaks 4 h. C:1Documents and Settings\pesfost\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK1C\SCENIC OAKS 6.DOC 201 FOURTH STREET SE ROOM 150 ROCHESTER MINNESOTA 55904-3769 TELE 507-281-6164 FAX 507-281-6165 DSTOTZ@ CI.ROCHESTER.MN.US Rochester -Olmsted Planning r; _�artment GIS/Addressing Division 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 Rochester, MN 559D4-4744 FINAL PLAT REFERRAL RESPONSE DATE: June 19, 2006 TO: Jennifer Garness, Stephanie Foster FROM: Randy Growden GIS/Addressing Staff Rochester -Olmsted County Planning Department CC: Jan Chezick; Ed Kuisle; Mark Welch RE: SCENIC OAKS SIXTH ADDITION FINAL PLAT # 05-24 Phone: (507) 285-8232 Fax: (507)287-2275 UPON REVIEW OF THIS PLAT THE FOLLOWING FEES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PAID BEFORE THE PLAT CAN BE ADDRESSED. E911 ADDRESSING FEE: $ 2400.00 (30 LOTS/ADDRESSES) GIS IMPACT FEE: $ 865.00 (31 LOTS/OUTLOTS) Notes: 1. Additional E911 Addressing fees may be required upon Site Plan review. 2. Final Plats must be approved and the above fees paid before application requests for addressing can be submitted to the E911 Addressing Staff — Rochester/Olmsted A review of the final plat has turned up the following ADDRESS or ROADWAY related issues: Upon review of SCENIC OAKS SIXTH ADDITION the GIS / Addressing staff has found no issues to bring forth at this time. 11 ROCHESTER r1 H41"" TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Rochester, MN 55904 WORKS 2010 Street SE Room 10B FROM: Mark E. Baker Rochester 507- 87780043740 FAX — 507-281-6216 DATE: 6/22106 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for Final Plat #05-24. for Scenic Oaks Sixth Addition (proposed replat of Outlot `B' Scenic Oaks 5tb Addition). The following are Public Works comments on this request: 1. A Development Agreement has been executed for this Property. 2. The Owner has previously constructed stormwater detention facilities that serve a portion of the Scenic Oaks developments. Any areas of this subdivision that do not drain to an existing privately constructed detention facility, previously approved to serve this Property and meeting current design standards, are subject to a Storm Water Management Plan area charge. 3. Approval of a City -Owner Contract is required for the proposed public infrastructure to serve this development. 4. Dedication of an applicable temporary easement, and construction of a temporary turn -around is required at the northerly extent of Scenic View Dr SW. 5. No parking will be permitted along the north side of Britwood Ln SW from Scenic View Dr SW to, but not including the cul-de-sac bulb. Charges/fees applicable to the development of this property are/will be included in the Development Agreement & City -Owner Contract and will include (rates below are current through 7/31/06): :• NOTE: This Property has previously been assessed and paid charges applicable to SAC for the 7207 project. The Water Availability Charge is $1298.94 per developable acre plus interest for 10 years at 7.5 % from 3/6/95 for City Project 19266 Storm Water Management, for any areas that do not drain to the on -site detention facilities @ $2,593.19 per developable acre Traffic Signs as determined by the City Engineer. Contribution for Pedestrian Ramps - TBD First Seal Coat @ $0.57 per square yard of public street surface. C:\Documents and Settings\plasfcst\Local Settings\Temporary Internet F1les\OLK1C\FPO5-24 Scenic Oaks 6th Addition.doc REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7-5-06 AGENDA SECTION: IJPnU(IVAI uvu war 1. 11 �LIy..• I PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING �, 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Type III, Phase III Conditional Use Permit #06-20, by PREPARED BY: Rochester Ready Mix, for the installation of a bridge over the South Run of the Mitzi A. Baker, North Fork of Cascade Creek, and associated work. The property is located Senior Planner south of 1gt" Street, west of CR 22/West Circle Drive and north of 71" Street NW. A Conditional Use Permit is required since the construction will be in the Floodway and 100-year floodplain. _ June 29, 2006 Note: the applicant provided an electronic letter (unsigned) certifying that the requirements of Section 62.860 of the LDM will be met with this application. Planning informed the consultant that a signed letter will be needed prior to Council action on the Conditional Use Permit. City Plannino and Zoning Commission Recommendation: On June 14, 2006 the City Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to consider this permit. The Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit 6-0 (Ohly moved, McGuine seconded) subject to the following conditions/modifications: -Prior to final action by the City Council, the applicant shall provide certification required in Section 62.860 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. .1 .1 _ l.___:__:_- ...:_t-- •....... I. - ...............n.•hfinn doff wnr Irl r=! nmmpnrf thp. fnllowlnn Condition or modifications: Il (flu l,VIII I"bIVII wlbnva tv luanc a ,v. ...u,cnuw.vu, v...•, ......... •....-......_..-. ..._ ._.._.....� __..__-_ 1. Prior to commencing grading or construction activities on this site, the applicant must obtain grading plan approval from the City and concurrence from the City Public Works department with the hydraulic analysis required for this Conditional Use Permit. Council Action Needed: 1. The Council shall hold a public hearing. 2. If the Council wishes to proceed, it should instruct the City Attorney to prepare a resolution either approving, approving with conditions, or denying the Conditional Use Permit request based upon the criteria included in the staff report. Distribution: 1. City Administrator 2. City Attorney: Legal Description Attached 3. Planning Department File 4. Applicant: This item will be considered some time after 7:00 pm in the Council/Board Chambers at the Government Center onWEDNESDAY July 5,2006. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to 1 MAP NUMBER 27109CO142 E MAP REVISED, FEBRUARY 4,1998 f6 Federal Emergency Management Agency North Run :ONE X f the NorthFork of Cascade Creek RM 15 F U 1 PRIVATE DRIcE RD ZONE X ZONE X� ZONE ) Olmsted County Unincorporated Area; 270626 ZONE X V\ MASSEY LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 428 PHONE (507) 634-4505 FAX (507) 634-6560 KASSON, MN 55944 E-MAIL masssurvey@kmtel.com June 28, 2006 Ms. Mitzi Baker Rochester — Olmsted Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 RE: Rochester Ready Mix Rochester, MN Dear Ms. Baker: In accordance with Section 62.860 of the City of Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual, we offer the following: 1. No unnecessary fill is being placed in the flood prone area. 2. Storage capacity in the flood fringe is not being reduced by the placement of the fill. 3. Erosion potential has not been increased, or has been mitigated by construction practices (i.e. rip -rap under bridge abutments). Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Massey Land Surveying and Engineering Kyle Skov, PE ROCHESTER-OLMSTED PLANNING DEP.4KTMENT 2122 Campus Drive SE, Suite 100 F Rochester, MN 55904.4744 CC U N T Y OF WwwArnstedcounty.com/planning TO: City Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Mitzi A. Baker, Senior Planner DATE: June S, 2006 "V�. RE,s►6nf 1P��ii�lo�irr, RE: Type III, Phase III Conditional Use Permit #06-20, by Rochester Ready Mix, for the installation of a bridge over the South Run of the North Fork of Cascade Creek, and associated work. The property is located south of 1gth Street, west of CR 22Mest Circle Drive and north of 7th Street NW. A Conditional Use Permit is required since the construction will be in the Floodway and 100-year floodplain. Planninq Department Review: Applicant(s): Rochester Ready Mix 412 2nd Ave NW Rochester, MN 55901 Engineer/Consultant: Massey Land Surveying & Engineering PO Box 428 Kasson, MN 55944 Requested Action: The applicant is proposing to place a bridge over the south run of the north fork of Cascade Creek south of 19'h St. NW, west of West Circle Drive. Location of Property: This property is located south of 19'h Street NW, west of West Circle Drive and north of TH 14. Zoning: The property is zoned M-2 (Industrial) in the City of Rochester. Referral Comments: MN DNR; Rochester Public Works; John Harford, Wetlands LGU Standards for Approval: Conditional use permits in the Flood Districts are subject to the same standards as every conditional use (see Section 61.146), and some specific conditions related to the Flood Districts (62.800 — 62.883). Report Attachments: 1. Excerpts from the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual 2. Application materials (report and plans) BUILDING CODE 5071285-8345 • GIS/ADDRESSING/MAPPING 5071265-8232 • HOUSING/HRA 507/285-8224 PLANNING/ZONING 507/285-8232 • WELUSEPTIC 507/285-8345 T� (� FAX 507/287-2275 �"IN1 nni cnn Al nvanRTI IFIR-WAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER W Backaround & Summa A General Development Plan was approved for this property earlier this year. The plan identified a future bridge in the vicinity that the applicant is proposing a bridge under this Conditional Use Permit (see attached GDP). The applicant is now proposing to install anew bridge over the south run of the north fork of Cascade Creek on their property. The MN DNR has reviewed the plan, and supports the proposal, noting that the bridge construction will cause an increase in the flood elevation by 0.5 feet but that the area affected by the increase is confined to the requestor's property and that this increase meets the State floodway criteria. According to the project narrative, the bridge abutments would be placed outside the Floodway, but within the Flood Prone district. When deciding on a Conditional Use Permit in any flood district, the standards of Sections 61.146 and 62.824 shall be considered. These sections are attached to the staff report. In addition to Sections 61.146 and 62.860 need to be complied with. Section 62.860 of the LDM states that "the deposition of any fill or spoil from dredging of sand and gravel operations, the construction of any structure, or the grading or paving of any areas shall require certification by a registered engineer or hydrologist that the following conditions have been met: 1. Fill deposited in the flood prone area shall be no more than the minimum amount necessary to conduct the use. 2. No net loss of capacity for surface storage of flood waters shall result from the activity. 3. The effect of such activities in the flood prone area shall not result in an increase in erosion potential on the site. Recommendation: A couple years ago, the City Council directed staff to use the discharge rates on the water ways that existed prior to the construction of the flood control structures in analyzing activities within the floodplains downstream of the structures. The applicant's consultant is in the process of verifying that the data used in the hydraulic analysis was based on discharge rates without the structures in place. If the analysis incorporated the correct data, staff will recommend approval with the conditions listed below. If the analysis did not use the correct data, the applicant will agree to continuing this item for two weeks to allow time to re -do and re -submit the hydraulic analysis. "Prior to final action by the City Council, the applicant shall provide certification required in Section 62.860 of the Rochester Zoning Ordinance and Land Development Manual. If the Commission wishes to make a recommendation, staff would recommend the following conditions or modifications: 1. Prior to commencing grading or construction activities on this site, the applicant must obtain grading plan approval from the City and concurrence from the City Public Works department with the hydraulic analysis required for this Conditional Use Permit. Plannino Commission Action Needed: Conditional use permits of this sort require City Council approval. The Planning Commission should consider this item (not a public hearing, but was published as one in error) and make a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, or deny this request to be forwarded to the City Council. The City Council will hold a public hearing at a later date. EXCERPTS FROM THE ROCHESTER ZONING ORDINANCE AND LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL 61.145 Matters Under Consideration: The review of a conditional use is necessary to insure that it will not be of detriment to and is designed to be compatible with land uses and the area surrounding its location; and that it is consistent with the objectives and purposes of this ordinance and the comprehensive plan. 61.146 Standards for Conditional Uses: The zoning administrator, Commission, or Council shall approve a development permit authorizing a conditional use unless one or more of the following findings with respect to the proposed development is made: 1) provisions for vehicular loading, unloading, parking and for vehicular and pedestrian circulation on the site and onto adjacent public streets and ways will create hazards to safety, or will impose a significant burden upon public facilities. 2) The intensity, location, operation, or height of proposed buildings and structures will be detrimental to other private development in the neighborhood or will impose undue burdens on the sewers, sanitary and storm drains, water or similar public facilities. 3) The provision for on -site bufferyards and landscaping does not provide adequate protection to neighboring properties from detrimental features of the development. 4) The site plan fails to provide for the soil erosion and drainage problems that may be created by the development. 5) The provisions for exterior lighting create undue hazards to motorists traveling on adjacent public streets or are inadequate for the safety of occupants or users of the site or such provisions damage the value and diminish the usability of adjacent properties. 6) The proposed development will create undue fire safety hazards by not providing adequate access to the site, or to the buildings on the site, for emergency vehicles. 7) In cases where a Phase I plan has been approved, there is a substantial change in the Phase II site plan from the approved Phase I site plan, such that the revised plans will not meet the standards provided by this paragraph. 8) The proposed conditional use does not comply with all the standards applying to permitted uses within the underlying zoning district, or with standards specifically applicable to the type of conditional use under consideration, or with specific ordinance standards dealing with matters such as signs which are part of the proposed development, and a variance to allow such deviation has not been secured by the applicant. 62.824 Conditional Use Permits - Standards for Approval: When deciding on Conditional Use Permits in any of the flood districts, the following factors, in addition to the standards of Paragraph 61.146 shall also be considered: 1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. 2) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others. 3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary condition. 4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. 5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. 6) The need for a waterfront location for the facility. 7) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. 8) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. 9) The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and flood plain management program for the area. 10) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. 11) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the Flood waters expected at the site. 12) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of Paragraph 62.800. 62.860 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS IN THE FLOOD PRONE DISTRICT The requirements applicable in the Flood Fringe District, as defined in Section 62.840 shall apply in the Flood Prone District and, in addition, the deposition of any fill or spoil from dredging of sand and gravel operations, the construction of any structure, or the grading or paving of any areas shall require certification by a registered professional engineer or hydrologist that the following conditions have been met: 1) Fill deposited in the flood prone area shall be no more than the minimum amount necessary to conduct the use. 2) No net loss of capacity for surface storage of flood waters shall result from the activity. 3) The effect of such activities in the flood prone area shall not result in an increase in erosion potential on the site. \10 xocHesTEx H4�. TO: Consolidated Planning Department 2122 Campus Drive SE Rochester, MN 55904 FROM: Mark E. Baker DATE: 06/5/06 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 201 4" Street SE Room 108 Rochester, MN 55904-3740 507-287-7800 FAX — 507-281-6216 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the application for CUP#06-20, by Rochester Ready Mix for a the installation of a proposed Bridge over the North Fork of Cascade Creek. The following are Public Works comments on this proposal: 1. Grading & Drainage Plan approval is required. The-MR-61reservoir spillway hydrograph must be utilized for the design of the proposed structure. C:1Documents and Settings\plajgarn%Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK61\CUP06-20 Rochester Rady Mix (bridge over Cascade Creek).doc r vo1 WETLAND COMMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Application Number: Type III Phase III Conditional Use Permit #06-20, by Rochester Ready Mix No hydric soils exist on the site based on the Soil Survey Hydric soils exist on the site according to the Soil Survey. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands on the property and submitting the information as part of this application. A wetland delineation has been carried out for the property and is on file with the Planning Department. ElA wetland delineation is on file with the Planning Department and a No -Loss, Exemption, or Replacement Plan has been submitted to the Planning Department. A wetland related application has been approved by the City. This plan incorporates the approved wetland plan. No hydric soils exist on the property based on the Soil Survey. However, due to the location in the landscape, the property owner should examine the site for wetlands. The property owner is responsible for identifying wetlands. ® Other or Explanation: The applicant has submitted for approval from DNR a Public Waters permit. The DNR will be responsible for any wetland as the site is heavily disturbed and the only potential wetland area is within the Dnr's jurisdiction. From John Harford Wetlands LGU Representative / CD �..pm o I�7 ,\ y0 m IfNN'UQ!F'-�-LLLLLL Lm~ � O o ,,m GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RDCHESTER READY MIX MASSEY LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 428 PHONE (507) 634-4505 FAX (507) 634-6560 KASSON, MN 55944 May 12, 2006 E-MAIL masssurvey@kmtel.com ROCHESTER READY MIX — PROPOSED BRIDGE The enclosed information is relative to the Type III, Phase 1 Development application for a conditional use permit for Rochester Ready Mix. The purpose of the submittal is to permit the installation of a new bridge over the south run of the north fork of Cascade Creek within the city limits of Rochester, MN. In order for this project to receive approval from FEMA a community acknowledgement form must be included with the FEMA Submittal. We are submitting the enclosed information for review in order to have the City of Rochester approve the community acknowledgement form. A letter from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, stating they have reviewed the plan and that the increase in the base flood elevation meets the state floodway criteria is included also. Locally Corey Hanson from the DNR worked on this project, Susan 7iwane reviewed the submittal information at the state level. I have enclosed the following: • Type III, Phase I Development Application • MNDNR letter from Ogbazghi Sium, Supervisor, Floodplain Management Program • Project Narrative as submitted to the DNR • FEMA Overview and Concurrence form • Proposed Bridge Plan • Warranty Deed for Property • Appropriate FEMA Firm Map • Worksheet showing cross -Section locations, etc. Please contact me with any questions. Kyle Skov, PE Massey Surveying and Engineering RECEIVED MAY 1 5 2005) 0 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-40_ March 29, 2006 Mr. Kyle Skov P.O Box 428 Massey Land Surveying and Engineering Kasson, Mn 55944 Re: Rochester Ready Mix Bridge Addition Dear Mr. Skov: The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Waters (DNR Waters) has reviewed the data submitted for the CLOMR to add a bridge on the South Run of the North Fork of Cascade Creek. Analysis of the hydraulic effects of the bridge required additional cross - sections in the model. Additional cross -sectional data field surveyed and added to original model increased the 1% flood stage. The model extends far enough upstream so that the original and updated models tie-in. The proposed bridge was added to the updated model and caused an increase of 0.5 feet. The area effected by the increase is confined to the rcquestor's property. This increase meets the state floodway criteria. If you have questions please contact Suzanne Jiwani at Suzanne.jiwani@dnr.state.mn.us. �� '' Ogbazghi Si PE Supervisor, Floodplain Management Program State NFIP Coordinator cc. Corey Hanson, DNR Area Hydrologist John Harford, Olmsted County DNR Information:651-296-6157 • 1-888-646-6367 • 717Y:651-296-5484 • 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer �w Panted on Recycled Paper Containing a Minimum of 10%Post-Consumer Waste MASSEY LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 428 PHONE (507) 634-4505 FAX (507) 634-6560 KASSON, MN 55944 E-MAIL masssurvey@kmtel.com PROJECT NARATIVE: PROPOSED ROCHESTER READY MIX BRIDGE ADDITION Rochester Ready Mix is proposing to add a private bridge on their property in Section 29, Cascade Township, Olmsted County, Minnesota within the city limits of Rochester, MN. This private bridge will cross the south run of the north fork of Cascade Creek. The purpose of this bridge is to allow access to property on the north side of the creek from a proposed material handling facility on the south side of the creek. The HEC-2 model for the existing FIRM maps was obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR). The HEC-2 file was converted to HEC- RAS file original. Massey Land Surveying and Engineering took additional cross sections in the field. These cross sections were added to the original model to represent existing field conditions, HEC-RAS file originalwithcrosssection. We found that there was some discrepancy between the model used for the FIRM map and what was found in the field. The water surface profile was increased up to 0.86 by adding the actual surveyed cross sections into the model. We are using this updated model as our base for analysis. The bridge was added to the updated model and is contained in file proposed bridge. We found that a 54 foot span bridge with a deck elevation of 1029.42 ft, was capable of passing the 1 % chance (100 year) storm with a water surface elevation increase of 0.50 ft. or less. The bridge abutments were placed outside of the floodway, but within the flood fringe. Minimal filling was done for the bridge approaches. Hydrological profiles were not modified from the original model received from the MNDNR. Please contact Kyle Skov at Massey Land Surveying and Engineering with any questions with any questions regarding the flood analysis and this submittal. Sincerely, Massey Land Surveying and Engineering Kyle Skov Cs hp Li 'OF FROM ci; Vim lk \0 ! k § _ , '�K z F �j -- �� --� P: y & ¥ §� A ; a A `� q / k � 2. ! �. ` . ] | , ! | e Page 2 City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Hearing Date: June 14, 2006 Anderson asked if town homes would be allowed. Ms. Ber.replied no, the re -zoning to R-t eliminates that option. Ms. Anderson asd what would be the time -line for the Ms. Baker replied that th is no known time -line for the fect. Mr. Haeussinger replied that ma actors wou redict the total time -line of the development. Ms. Baker stated to Ms. Anderson the ity Council would hear the issue next. With no one else wishing to heard, Mr. Bur losed the public hearing. Mr. Haeussinger ask the acreage should be changed to 04 in the findings on page 20 of the staff report. Ms. yes. Ms. Baker presented the staff report dated June 6, 2006 to the Commission. A copy of the report is on file at the Rochester -Olmsted Planning Department. Mr. Burke asked if this would be the only application for the bridge, being that it straddles the property line. Ms. Baker replied that the bridge does not straddle the property line. She corrected where the bridge would be constructed. Mr. Kyle Skog of (Massey Survey Engineering) addressed the Commission. He stated that he Would be available to expand on any issues. Mr. Burke asked if they are in agreement with staff conditions. Mr. Skog replied yes. With no one wishing to be heard, Mr. Burke closed the public hearing. Page 3 City Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Hearing Date: June 14, 2006 OTHER BUSINESS: . Open Forum No o came forward. 2. As ma b rou ht u with memt No one came forwa ADJOURN: Motion made by Mr. Mc m Chair, adjourned the meeti at 7:12 Respectfully Submitt Philip .Wheeler, AICP sif adjourn, seconded by Haeussinger. Mr. Burke, Mr. Jay Burke, i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING �\ DATE: 07/05/06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: PUBLIC HEARINGS I Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: PROJECT HEARING: (J7749) Reconstruct 1"Av SW from 2nd Street SW to West Center Street. This is a Hearing to consider the following local improvement project: Project: City Project No. 6301-3-05 (J7749) Reconstruct 1" Av SW from 2nd Street SW to West Center Street. ITEM NO. �- 4 PREPARED BY: gt, M. Njgbur 7OVi Project Background The project consists of reconstructing 1" Avenue SW from Center Street to 2nd Street SW. Work will include: new concrete pavement, new sidewalks, curb and gutter, signal system modifications at 1" Ave and 1" Street, rehabilitation of stone sewer catch basins and replacement of the watermain for one block. This project is included in the 2006 -2011 Capital Improvement Program, item #23, page 36.. Funding for the project will be through City Share (tax levy funds) and from Assessments to the abutting property owners. The has City provided notification to the affected owners pursuant to State Statutes, for the Assessment Hearing and project hearing. The City has also held a 'neighborhood meeting' with the abutting owners and tenants in the area to discuss the project costs, timing, and coordination. As a result of that meeting some changes to the project schedule were made. Assessment Period All special assessments may be levied for a period of ten years with interest charged at a rate of 5.75% annually on the unpaid balance, or they may be paid in full when levied. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution ordering the project to be made. COUNCIL ACTION: Motlon BUDGET DATA SCHEDULE FOR CONSfRUCT1ON CONTRACT Project Manager: Doug Nelson Engineering Firm: Yaggy Contractor: Elcor Construction Project Inspector: Project Na CapitImprovement Information: Date of Origination J No. J7749 Paal Year: 20D6 ge No.: State Aid No. Type:Street Kecon CIP Project No.: Description: 1st Avenue 2nd Street Sout to Center Street ProjectSubstantial on Date Completion COUNCIL ACTION DATE 07/OSf06 PROJECT BUDGET CONTRACT FINAL (FEASIBILITY REPORT) (AWARD) COST CONSTRUCTION COSTS 58,03.00 0.00 Water(150) 0.00 0.00 Sanitary Sewer (250) 410,569.83 0.00 Street(350) 19,200.00 0.00 Storm Sewer(450) 1,. 0.00 Pedestrian Facilities (550) 128,90505.00 0 0.00 Traffic Signals(650) 29,365.OD 0.00 Decorative Lighting 759,963.23 0.00 SUB -TOTAL 0.00 0.00 227,968.97 /IVALUEf Engineering, Interest, Contingencies 0.00 Land Acquisition TOTAL $ - $ 987,952.20 pVALUEI FUNDING DISTRIBUTION 2200 Street Resurfacing 446,926.89 2201 Street Rehabilitation 4944 MSAS Reserves 4946 Bikeways 6501 Storm Water Management 722a Hadley Valley-TID 8201 WAC/Connection Charges 8202 SAC/Connection Charges 8204 Assessments (Total Assessment Role) 353,377.85 8207 Substandard Street 8208 Traffic Calming 8209 Pedestrian Facility Charges 9212 SAC/Capacity Relief 8222 Sanitary Sewer Tunnel 8307 Sidewalk Construction 9757 Northwest/Kings Run-TID SIM Willow Creek-TID Developer Funds/Contributions DNR Funds Federal Aid Funds Municipal State Aid Funds Retained Earnings (Specify UtIMY) Water Utflrty Share 75,445.50 SAC Revenue Bonds 0owntbv`Ai�AbAtemgBYunds4+; 112,201.96 SalesTgxZStreeS „,:t+:xw� i -. -:: TOTAL $ $ 987,952.20 S - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 07/05/06 ',GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: PUBLIC HEARINGS I Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: ASSESSMENT HEARING:�J7749) Reconstruct 1st Av SW from 2 Street SW to West Center Street. ITEM NO. C' 5 PREPARED BY: Z M. Nigbur 7"rl,,J This is a Hearing to consider the levying of special assessments for the following local improvement project: Project: City Project No. 6301-3-05 (J7749) Reconstruct 1st Av SW from 2nd Street SW to West Center Street. Project Background The project consists of reconstructing 1st Avenue SW from Center Street to 2"d Street SW. Work will include: new concrete pavement, new sidewalks, curb and gutter, signal system modifications at I" Ave and 1st Street, rehabilitation of storm sewer catch basins and replacement of the watermain in one block. This project is included in the 2006 -2011 Capital Improvement Program, item #23, page 36. Funding for the project will be through City Share (tax levy funds) and from Assessments to the abutting property owners. The has City provided notification to the affected owners pursuant to State Statutes, for the Assessment Hearing and project hearing. The City has also held a'neighborhood meeting' with the abutting owners and tenants in the area to discuss the project costs, timing, and coordination. As a result of that meeting some changes to the project schedule were made. Assessments Upon receipt of the bid documents for the project Staff has recalculated the costs & assessments for the project. This recalculation provides a reduction in the owner's cost obligation for the project. The following assessment rates are applicable to the Project: Street Reconstruction Rate = $ 264.551 per foot ($319.786 per foot pre bid estimate) Sidewalk = $ 5.0367per square foot ($5.086 per square foot, pre bid estimate) NOTE: for sidewalk construction and decorative lighting Downtown Abatement Funds are being used to partially offset the Owner's cost. This rate reflects the reduction due to the additional utilization of funds. Assessment Period All special assessments may be levied for a period of ten years with interest charged at a rate of 5.75% annually on the unpaid balance, or they may be paid in full when levied. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution levying the proposed assessments. NOTE TO CLERK: - Adopted assessment only. Billings are not to be sent until project substantially completed. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 A SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADMINISTRATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO RECONSIDER SUBSTANTIAL LAND ALTERATION FOR WILLOW HEIGHTS 5TH SUBDIVISION - REVISED - 1-- I PREPARED BY: S.KVENVOLD Councilmember Blenker has requested a reconsideration of the substantial land alteration for Willow Heights 5a' Subdivision in order to place additional time limits on the excavation activities that will take place as the property is developed. The current noise ordinance provisions will allow excavation activities to take place from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday thru Saturday Sunday. In order to enact any lesser time frame for these excavation activities, the City Council must do so in the approval of the substantial land alteration. Councilmember Blenker has recommended a time restriction of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Saturday. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A Councilmember on the prevailing vote on the substantial land alteration approval (Means, Snyder, Nowicki) may make a motion to reconsider; any Councilmember may second such a motion. COUNCIL ACTION: Mason by: second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I ADMINISTRATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO RECONSIDER SUBSTANTIAL LAND ALTERATION FOR WILLOW HEIGHTS 5V SUBDIVISION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 F-1 PREPARED BY: S.KVENVOLD Councilmember Blenker has requested a reconsideration of the substantial land alteration for Willow Heights 5"' Subdivision in order to place additional time limits on the excavation activities that will take place as the property is developed. The current noise ordinance provisions will allow excavation activities to take place from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday thru Saturday. In order to enact any lesser time frame for these excavation activities, the City Council must do so in the approval of the substantial land alteration. Councilmember Blenker has recommended a time restriction of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon on Saturday. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: A Councilmember on the prevailing vote on the substantial land alteration approval (Means, Snyder, Nowicki) may make a motion to reconsider; any Councilmember may second such a motion. r' n (altA M -t- S f11�441' COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by second by: to. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ITEM DESCRIPTION: MEETING 113 DATE: 07/05/06 CITY CLERK - a REQUESTS PREPARED BY Bethany Gerber The following SOUND AMPLIFICATION REQUESTS are submitted for the Council's approvals or disapprovals. All are pending departmental approvals, the required insurance, bonds, fees and all outstanding debts with the City of Rochester. Whistle Binkies 3120 Wellner Drive NE Rochester, MN 55906 4'' Anniversary Celebration -Band 07/15/06 MAXIMUM SOUND OF 85 DECIBELS Rochester GLCS 1500 1" Avenue NE Rochester, MN 55906 Central Park Rochester Pride Fest 07/29/06 MAXIMUM SOUND OF 85 DECIBELS Whistle Binkies On the Lake 247 Wood Lake Drive SE Rochester, MN 55902 Outside Patio Music -3 piece band 07/22/06 MAXIMUM SOUND OF 85 DECIBELS Whistle Binkies on the Lake 247 Wood Lake Drive SE Rochester, MN 55902 Benefit Concert on the Patio 08/05/06 MAXIMUM SOUND OF 85 DECIBELS 12:00 PM to 10:00 PM 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM 2:30 PM to 6:30 PM 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM Rochester Peace Lantern Float (Pax Cristi, sisters of St. Francis and Judith Hoffman) 2223 Viking Drive NW Rochester, MN 55901 Silver Lake East Shelter 08/06/06 6:30 PM to 9:30 PM WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 10:30 pm COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: second by: to: J SOUND AMPLIFICATION REQUESTS PAGE DULY 5TH, 2006 Victor Lewis Souders 502 170' Avenue NE Rochester, MN 55906 Karaoke DJ at a Family Function 07/28/06 8:30 PM MAXIMUM SOUND OF 85 DECIBELS March of Dimes 32 Woodlake Drive SE to Rochester, MN 55904 Night Lights 8K Run at Soldier's Field 10/06/06 7:00 PM WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 10:30 PM Hangar Bar and Grill 7386 Airport View Drive Rochester, MN 55902 Battle of the Bands 07/15/06 3:00 PM to Spin Drift CD Realease 07/22/06 5:00 PM to 7 Day Weekend Band 08/05/06 5:00 PM to Jesse Lang 08/12/06 5:00 PM to *All of the above events are held at the Hangar Amphitheater. WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 10:30 PM Brother's Bar and Grill 812 South Broadway Rochester, MN 55901 DJ Talent Contest 07/27/06 6:00 PM to WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 10:30 PM COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED A motion to approve the sound amplification permits as presented. 12:00 PM to 10:00 PM 10:30 PM 10:30 PM 10:30 PM 10:30 PM 10:00 PM • North American Realty 3800 Highway 52 North Suite 130 Rochester MN 55901 507-287-0909 507-288-0658 July 5, 2006 City of Rochester Common Council c/o Judy Scherr, CMC City Clerk Rochester City Hall, Room 1 15 201 4`h Street SE Rochester MN 55901 RE: Willow Heights 5th Addition, EAW Petition and Rare Species Dear Honorable Member of the Common Council: Enclosed is the study on rare plant species by Westwood Professional services. Any questions please contact me. Sincerely, av Franklin P. Kottschade MEMORANDUM Date: June 19, 2006 W Re: Willow Heights, Rochester; EAW Petition and Rare Species Westwood File 20061082.00 To: Michele Caron, Eden Prairie From: Rob Bouta, Sr. Environmental Scientist Gen Bolling, Environmental Scientist/Botantst Background Walwmd h fb ml Sxv. 76" MMg m O'M ftr Nr, MM 553" 453]-5(50 eau 5Mt-337a."7 -5150 .s.,,, nPsDue,M9rda�:Om w ..weMwpglM. This memo responds to the rare plant species discussion in the petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) on Willow Heights Residential Development. After review of the site by the DNR Regional Plant Ecologist and three natural resource professionals on two separate days, we have concluded that the protected species identified in the petition were not present on the site. The three natural resource professionals include Gen Bolling (BS, Plant Biology), Rob Bouta (BS, Wildlife Biology; MS Forest Biology) and Renee Nation (BS, Biology and Horticulture). Renee Nation is a Rochester Botanist who has contracted with the DNR and is included on the DNR Natural Heritage Program list of Botanists/Ecologists who are qualified to survey for rare species. Renee's letter is attached. The primary purpose of an EAW is to determine whether a project has potential for significant environmental effects. In our opinion, the project does not have potential for significant environmental effects on rare species. Consequently, an EAW process is not necessary. The petition for an EAW and additional information provided by the petitioners mentioned seven plant species that the petitioners believe may, be present on the site. Of those seven species, only prairie shooting star (Dodecatheon meadia), Sullivant's milkweed (Asclepius sullivantiz), and Christmas fem (Polystichum acrostichoides) are state protected (i.e., threatened or endangered) and have the potential to occur in the project area. Of the four remaining species, western Jacob's-ladder (Polemonium occidentale ssp. lacustre) is a state -endangered species, but is only known to occur in six locations in far northern Minnesota and Wisconsin (See attached Internet pages). Small -leaved pussytoes (Antennaria parvifolia) is a state -listed special concern species. Although it was not blooming, we found what we believe is field pussytoes (Antennaria neglecta), a more common species with less pubescent leaves. The petitioners also expressed concern regarding lily -leaved twayblade (Liparis Iillifolia) and showy orchis (Galearis spectabilis). Although we identified two local populations 1 S ; n s n [ D N , ... TWMi CMLWAE SL CLOMD wthim RD Memorandum — Willow Heights, Rochester; Rare Species • June 19, 2006 Page 2 ��. of few individual orchids on the site, neither of the species suggested to be on the site by the petitioners are state -protected Westwood Initial Site Review A site walk-through was conducted by Gen Bolling of Westwood Professional Services and the DNR Regional Plant Ecologist (Ann Pierce) on May 30, 2006, Ms. Pierce indicated the site consists of mesic oak forest with ravines, wetland, and degraded dry prairie and savanna. Onsite observations of common buckthorn, prickly ash, and smooth brume confirmed that the plant communities are degraded. The Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS), began by the DNR in 1987 as a systematic survey of rare biological features, has been completed for Olmsted County. The MCBS did not identify any plant communities within the project site, and did not identify the species listed by the petitioners as occurring in Olmsted County. Rare Species Survey Methods Prior to surveying the site in the field on June 16, 2006, Gen Bolling, Rob Bouta, and Renee Nation prepared for the review in the following manner: 1. Reviewed the preferred habitat, flowering phenology, and distinguishing taxonomic characteristics of each of the species in question. 2. Reviewed photographs and available herbarium specimens of the species in question. 3. Georeferenced the map of species locations that was provided by the petitioners, and uploaded the coordinates of each species observation into a sub -meter accuracy Trimble GcoXT Global Positioning System (GPS) (see Exhibit 1). Review if available information indicated that prairie shooting star and Christmas fern would be more likely than Sullivant's milkweed to occur on the site. According to Minnesota's Endangered Flora and Fauna (Coffin and Pfannmuller, 1998), most surviving plants of Sullivant's milkweed in Minnesota are confined to prairie remnants that occur on railroad rights of way, and the species shows little ability to survive in degraded habitats. This memo includes a fairly complete list of plant species that occur on the property. In some cases, we did not identify plants to species if it did not affect the conclusions of the survey. The unidentified orchid does not have characteristics similar to state threatened and endangered species. planning > engineering > surveying Memorandum — Willow Heights, Rochester; Rare Species . June 19, 2006 Page 3 w Table 1. Sped s identified bY Petitioners as potentiall being onsite. Scientific Common State State Flowering Preferred Petitioner name name Status Protected Phenology Habitat Notes Prairie, Dodecotheon pine May, June savanna, In ravine meadia shooting Endangered Yes D. radicatam: rock within wet star Apr -Jun outcrops, prairie woodland Jun, Jul Asclepias sullivantii s d Threatened Yes A. syriaca & Mesic tall ass Sr Possible St. mlkwee milkweed A. speciosa: John's Wort .. July, AugPrairie Depression west of Polystichum Christmas 1 hr�� Yes Not Wooded wetland and acrostichoides fern Applicable slopes in ravine in the NW comer Rather American open rich basswood Polemonium western July conifer grove occidentale Jacob's- Endangered Yes P. replan: swamps ssp. lacustre ladder Apr -Jun with by Virginia Sphagnum waterleaf and other moss carpet forbs May -Jul A. Open or Antennaria small- leaved p S ecial microphylla: partially Near rry parvifolia pussytoes concern No May -Aug; A shaded bushes bbushes on on plantagnifolia: areas; sandy soils wet prairie Apr -Jun Depression Not listed May, Jun in NW Galeai Showy under No p, Not comer' in a specrabilis orchis rotundifolia: Applicable Slade south review Jun, Jul of American Basswood grove Liparis Lily- Not lis!jNo Jun, Jut Not lilifolia twa blade Applicable None review s s ra. a s e e..n i s l c, z planning > engineering n surveying Memorandum — Willow Heights, Rochester; Rare Species . June 19, 2006 Page 4 TabI P le lantspecies observed on the site-' Scientific Name Common Name Acer negundo Boxelder Acer saccharum Suear ma le Achillea milli oltum Yarrow Angelica afro urea Anizelica. Antennaria ne lecta Field uss oes Arctium minus Common burdock Arisaema tri h Ilum Jack -in -the- ul it Ambrosia artemisii olia Common ragweed Apocynum s . Do bane Ascle ias syriaca Common milkweed Ascle ias verticillata Whorled milkweed Aster s . Aster Bromus inermis I Smooth brome Cannabis sativa Wild hem Carex s . Three sedge species Carex blanda Bland sedge Circium arvense Canada thistle Circium vul are Bull thistle Clrcaea s . Enchanter's nightshade Cornus racemosa Gray dogwood Coronilla varia Crown vetch Cyperus esculentus Yellow nut sedge Daucus carota Queen Anne's lace E uisetum arvense Field horsetail Eri eron annuus Daisy fleabane Eu atorium ru osum White snakeroot Fra aria s . Wild strawberry Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1 Green ash Galium a arine Cleavers Galium boreale Northern Bedstraw Geum canadense White avens Glechoma hederacea Creeping Charlie Hes eris matronalis Dames rocket Hypericum s . St. John's wort Impatiens s . Jewelweed Juncus s . Rush Juni erus vir iniana Eastern Red Cedar Lactuca s . Wild lettuce L chnis albs White cam ion E% T s 3 i , , � 1 1 1 H 1 9 2 planing > engineering a surveying w Memorandum - Willow Heights, Rochester; Rare Species June 19, 2006 Page 5 Table 2. Plantspecies observed on the site - Scientific Name' Common Name- Li aris lili olia Lily leaved twa blade three lants Leonurus cardiaca Motherwort Lonicera sp.. Honeysuckle LKCOPUS s . Water horehound Malus s /Cratae s s . Apple Melilotus o cinatis Yellow sweet clover Monarda fistulosa Wild bergamot Ne eta cataria Catnip Orchids . 1 Orchid Oxalis stricta Wood sorrel Parthenocissus s . Virginia creeper Pastinaca sativa Wild parsnip Phleum pretense Timothy Ph salis sp Ground cherry Plants o s . Plantain Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass Po ulus tremuloides Quaking aspen Potentilla recta Rough leaved cinquefoil Prunus s . Plum Prunus serotina Black cherry cnanthemum virginianum Mountain mint uercus macrvcarpa Bur oak Ranunculus abortivus Kidney leaf buttercup Rhamnus cathartica Common buckthorn Rumex cris us Curly dock Rhus glabra Smooth sumac Rhus radicans Poison ivy Ribes sp Gooseberry Robinia pseudoacacia Black locust Rubus s . Ras berry Rumen crispus I Curly dock Salix exigua Sandbar willow Salix cf amygdaloides Peach leaf willow Scro hularia lanceolata figwort Silene spAychinis s . White cam ion Solids o ri ida Stiff goldenrod Solids o c . Canadensis Canada goldenrod Solids o gigantea Giant goldenrod Stellaria pubera Great chickweed Stellaria vul alum Mouse -ear chickweed cIN, 1972 planning a engineering s surveying Memorandum — Willow Heights, Rochester; Rare Species June 19, 2006 Page 6 Table 2. Plantspecies observed on the site - Scientific Name Common Name ' Taraxacum o cinale Dandelion Triosteum perfoliatum Coffee lent T ha angustifolia Narrow leaved cattail Tri olium s . Hop clover Tri olium arvense White clover Tri olium pratense Red clover Ulmus so. Elm Urtica dioica Stinging nettle Verbascum thapsus Mullein Viburnum trilobum Hi bush cranberry Vicia americana American vetcb Viola s . Violets Vitis s . Wild grape Xanthoxylem americanum Prickly ash 1 Y 1 9 7 Z planning > engineering a surveying A Legend --- Property Boundary O Plant Locations - June 16, 2006 76" Anal heleSHonel Services, Inc Eden RSMIq MN SSIM WIONE SS D'5150 Em %O3 37d531 TOLL WE 1L6B6MS1S0 Westwood Willow Heights Rochester, Minnesota N Plant Locations - June 16, 2006 A0 300 Feet EXHIBIT 1 Report of Survey for Rare Plants, Willow Heights Residential Development, Rochester, Olmsted County, MN June 16, 2006 Renee G. Nation, botanist 5090 Milly Lane SW Rochester, MN 55902 mati on 0irconnect. corn (507)288-3718 On June 16, 2006, I met with Rob Bouta and Gen Bolling of Westwood Professional Services and conducted a rare plant survey on the proposed Willow Heights Residential Development site located in Southwest Rochester near the intersection of 40"' Street SW and U.S. 63. Our survey was conducted in response to a petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) on the proposed development. Specifically, we searched for seven species that petitioners thought were present on the site. Five of these species are Minnesota endangered, threatened or special concern species. Two more are not listed under these categories, but their status is under review by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. We did not find the five state protected species of concern to the petitioners (Dodecatheon media, Asclepias sullivantii, Polystichum acrostichoides, Polemonium occidentale spp. lucustre, Antennaria parviflora). We specifically visited locations identified by the petitioners as possibly containing these species and I am confident that the five species were not present. We did see orchids, with degraded flower stalks, that may have been Liparis lilifolia. The plants were photographed and the location documented by Gen Bolling. We saw orchids which had no flowers, and these were also photographed and location documented. None of the orchids we saw could be positively identified as Galearis spectablils. Attached is a list of the plant species I identified on the Willow Heights Residential Development site. This list should not be considered to be an exhaustive list of the plants occurring on the site. a Plant list, Willow Heights Residential Development site, Rochester, Olmsted County, MN June 16, 2006 Acer negundo Achilles millifolium Angelica atropurpurea Antennaria sp. Arctium minus Arisaema triphyllum Asclepias syriaca Asclepias verticillata Aster sp. Bromus inermis Carex spp. Circium sp. Comus sp. Coronilla varia Daucus carota Equisetum sp. Erigeron sp. Eupatorium rugosum Fragaria sp. Fraxinus sp. Quercus macrocarpa Galium aparine Galium boreale Geum sp. Hesperis matronalis Hypericum sp. Juniperus virgimana Lactuca sp. Liparis lilifolia Lonicera sp. Lycopussp. Melilotus officinalis Monarda Nepeta cataria Oxalis stricta Partbenocissus sp. Pastinaca sativa Phleum pratense Physalis sp. Populus sp. Potentilla recta Primus sp. Pycnanthemum virginianum Boxelder Yarrow Angelica Pussytoes (this did NOT look like A. parviflora) Burdock Jack-in-the-pulpit Common milkweed Whorled milkweed Aster Smooth brome Sedges Thistle Gray dogwood Crown vetch Queen Anne's lace Horsetail Fleabane White snakeroot Wild strawberry Ash Bur oak Cleavers Northern Bedstraw White avers Dames rocket St. John's wort Eastern Red Cedar Wild lettuce Lily leaved twayblade Honeysuckle Water horehound Yellow sweet clover Bergamot Catnip Wood sorrel Virginia creeper Wild parsnip Timothy Ground cherry Aspen Rough leaved cinquefoil Plum Mountain mint 7A� Ranunculus abortivus Kidney leaf buttercup Rhamnus cathartica Buckthorn Rhus glabra Sumac Rhus radicans Poison ivy Ribes sp. Gooseberry Robinia sp. Black locust Rumex crispus Curly dock Salix sp. Willow Silene sp/Lychinis sp. White campion Solidago rigida Stiff goldenrod Solidago sp. Goldenrod Taraxacum officinales Dandelion Triosteum perfoliatum Coffeeplant Typha angustifolia Narrow leaved cattail Ulmus sp. Elm Verbascum thapsus Mullein Viburnum trilobum. Highbush cranberry Vicia sp. American vetch Viola spp. Violets Vitis sp. Wild grape Xanthoxylem americanum Prickly ash Jacob's ladder - Wildflowers: Minnesota DNR Page 1 of 5 ��d i L'l Enter Keywords LJ ��ta �e t�• trxt azM�� ite Map I Contact the DNR I What's New? I Newsroom I Events & Seasons > MN DNR Home > Natural resources > Plants > Wildflowers Plants Jacob's ladder A occidentale Aquatic plants spp. lacustre Ferns. lichens, mosses For botanist Bruce Carlson, discovering a new location of western Jacob's ladder (P. occidentale spp. lacustre) will surely rank among the best personal discoveries of a lifetime. The botanists, ecologists and Flowers of western zoologists of the Minnesota County Jacob's ladder. Biological Survey (MCBS) spend countless hours hiking, crawling, climbing and wading through Minnesota's native plant communities and geologic features searching, in part, for rare plants and animals. Although most rare features are by their very nature difficult to find, rarities are nonetheless found every field season. However, western Jacob's ladder is elusive. As Bruce recalls, "Some of the best field botanists in the country have searched thousands of acres for P. occidentale spp. lacustre with Little success. Therefore, when I came upon the first vegetative shoots I was not immediately confident that I was looking at western Jacob's ladder. I thought, 'Um, looks like Jacob's ladder —but it can't be ... thafs too rare for me to find. It surely must be an escaped cultivar or some sort of fem.' But then I looked across a small opening in the wet cedar forest and nearly fainted with amazement when I spotted a flowering stalk. A rush of adrenaline surged through my veins as I shouted to the heavens, 'Lord, I am not worthy, show me a sign if this is indeed the rare Jacob's ladder!' The words had barely left my lips when my feet uncontrollably started dancing the releve jig, my belly rolled with amusement, and a smile formed on my face so big that I had to turn my head sideways in order to fit that grin between the trees as I hiked out of the forest!" Western Jacob's ladder (Polemonium occidentale ssp. lacustre) is a perennial plant with conspicuous sky-blue/bright violet flowers and ladder -like dissected leaves found in rich conifer swamps in northern Minnesota and Wisconsin. In fact, all six known locations of the subspecies worldwide are in these two states. Minnesotans can take pride in knowing that their home Trees & shrubs Wildflowers Natural resources Animals Plants Rocks & mineral Endaneered species Exotic species Climate Forests Prairies Water Nryine2abh http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/wildflowers/jacobsladder.htmi 6/13/2006 Jacob's ladder - Wildflowers: Minnesota DNR Page 2 of 5 Isstate contains four of those populations, while Wisconsinites can lay claim to the other two populations. Closely related to Polemonium occidentale, a species common in the Rocky mountains, the subspecies located in Minnesota and Wisconsin was first discovered in 1944 in 5t. Louis County, Minnesota by Olga Lakela, then curator of the University of Minnesota at Duluth Herbarium and a noted authority of northern Minnesota flora. This discovery served as the basis for defining a new subspecies previously unknown to science. A subsequent collection was made by one of Lakela's students in 1946 somewhere near the original location, but the location of both these populations became somewhat of a mystery to Minnesota botanists, who searched unsuccessfully for the plant throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Because the population could not be found, some people discredited Lakela's discovery, claiming that she might have transplanted a garden variety Jacob's ladder, P. caeruleum, into the site; or even faked the collection. Because the species had been nominated for consideration for the federal endangered species list, the Minnesota Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program initiated a search for the lost populations in 1988 and literally stumbled upon a population after two days of searching within a mile of the area described in Lakela's field notes. The 1946 location, however, has never been relocated and is not counted among the six known locations. Meanwhile, in 1982, Polemonium occidentale ssp. lacustre was discovered by botanists working for the Nicolet National Forest. This was an interesting find because it is located in habitat similar to the Lakela site but it is over 200 miles to the east in Florence county, Wisconsin, near the border of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. At that time the botanists who found the Florence population speculated that perhaps it originated from seeds brought into Wisconsin on the boots of http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/wildflowers/J*acobsiadder.htmi 6/13/2006 Jacob's ladder - Wildflowers: Minnesota DNR Page 3 of 5 19 forest fire fighters working between midwestern and western states, thus downplaying the subspecies' rarity. Both the attempt to discredit Lakela and the dirty -boot hypothesis were laid to rest in 1989, when Wisconsin specimens were sent to Dr. Dieter Wilken, an authority on the genus, for verification. He determined the Great Lakes Polemonium to be a distinct subspecies, as well -differentiated from other members of the genus as they are from each other. Western Jacob's ladder also differs from the garden species, P. caeruleum, in its lack of glands at the summit of the stem, its shallow, creeping rhizome, and its larger number of leaflets (9- 13 as opposed to 3-7) in the leaf subtending the flowering stalk. Because P. occidentale ssp. lacustre was being considered for inclusion on the federal endangered species list, a concerted effort to locate new populations was conducted between 1992- 95. Two professional botanists, working in Minnesota and Wisconsin, spent many weeks visiting 73 sites covering over 10,000 acres of habitat similar to the known locations. Despite these extensive searches and the efforts of other field botanists, only three more populations of the species were found between 1988 and 2001: two Minnesota sites 15 miles east and 50 miles south of the original location, and a second Wisconsin site, less than a mile from the first Wisconsin location. Another nine years passed when, in the summer of 2001, Bruce Carlson, a botanist and ecologist with MCBS, located the fourth Minnesota location and the sixth worldwide location in a conifer swamp in southeastern Itasca county, approximately 30 miles from the nearest previously known Minnesota site. Typical habitat for western Jacob's ladder is in a rather open wetland forest community with various amounts of white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), tamarack (Larix laricina) and black spruce(Picea mariana), and a continuous carpet of moss dominated by Sphagnum spp. Other interesting plants often associated with western Jacob's ladder include dragon's mouth (Arethusa bulbosa), showy lady's-slipper http://www.dar.state.mn.us/wildflowers/jacobsladder.html 6/13/2006 Jacob's ladder - Wildflowers: Minnesota DNR Page 4 cif 5 (Cypripedium reginae), cuckoo -flower (Cardamine pratensis var. palustris) and greater anowgrass (Trigiochin maritima). All of the known locations have a near neutral pH and water chemistry that suggests groundwater up - welling. Two human activities that often occur in this type of native plant community are peat mining and logging. While peat mining would definitely destroy all plants within the mining area, winter logging appears to either have no affect on the species or may actually promote its growth. All of the known locations have a history of logging. In some cases the logging occurred during the early 1900s while other sites have a more recent logging history dating to the 1980s and 1990s. In all six known locations, P. occidentale ssp. lacustre is most abundant and only blooms abundantly in natural or logging -related open areas where direct sunlight reaches the ground layer. While the relationship between logging and western Jacob's ladder has not been investigated it appears that winter logging under frozen ground conditions is not a serious threat to the persistence of this species. Factors controlling the rarity of this species are not well understood. In fact, the species has many characteristics that suggest that it should be more common. For example, there are millions of acres of apparently suitable habitat; it is a conspicuous plant not easily overlooked even by amateur botanists; the known locations have hundreds to thousands of individuals; and there is a large gap with many acres of suitable habitat between the Minnesota and Wisconsin populations. Despite the immense acreage of potential habitat, this species has received more concentrated attention than the majority of rue species in the Upper Midwest. Yet, over the course of recent field seasons, these efforts produced very few additional locations. Clearly, Polemonium occidentale sap. lacustre is a true rarity! http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/wildflowers/jacobsladder.html 6/13/2006 Jacob's ladder - Wildflowers: Minnesota DNR Page 5 of 5 a Back to too © 2006 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Copvright'Notice. Web site policies: Accessibility Linking Priyact, http:l/www.dnr.state.mn.us/wildflowers/jacobsladder.html 6/13/2006 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR ITEM F-2 JULY 5, 2006 AGENDA Mayor & Council Stevan Kvenvold Gary Neumann Terry Spaeth Terry Adkins Richard Freese APPLICATION# �/3a(nI3 Y PERMIT # 15 COUNCIL DATE: -? ^ S —O (o DATE RECEIVED %— A5 — a -a RECEIPT NUMBER Wlo (o 9 SCi AMOUNT PAID APPLICATION FOR SO LWD AMPLIFICATION PERMIT r / DATE OF APPLICATION: rj- / S'O APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 2D1 4TH ST. SE, ROCHESTER, M.N. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: l tJ }i i °rl (,i Z' ak te.5 U U-C (-f )c Yu 17 C. fb v6 le h ADDRESS: 34k l i[Ited` O{`, N-'- 1�c�y tP11+� 5-5"6 TELEPHONE NUMBER: r E9-Dcr-) CELL PHONE NUMBER: 45-a-6IJ5 CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: TELEPHONE NUMBER: a$Z9 I aS y' d�q-/��f� CELL PHONE NUMBER: a Q -6/df a4Q EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: DATE(S) OF EVENT: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: L-±(tG a.G7 Ic 6u fi .s , DAY(S) OF WEEK: �4TCxY iI .k MAXIM[174 NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON .ANY PARTICULAR DAY � D D HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED START TIME: Qa' ZD,M, Lknfe t ) END TIME: / o `. 06 0,74 r 2. ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL (Use.4dditional Sheet If Necessary)) 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LMTATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. ature of Applicant APPLICANT LIvr 0R-lLkTI0N NAME OF.APPLICANT/RBSPONSIBLE PARTY. L'l r i li%e ADDRESS: 7S L DATE OF BIRTH: HOME TELEPHONE NIRRIEER. � 1 �:Z61 CELL PHONE N NAME OF ORGANIZATION: .ADDRESS: 2 a ( TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON 1?�F0RMgTI0N 5-o-C/ CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: J / HOME ADDRESS: << (MIDDLE) (LAST) DATE OF BIRTH: TELEPHONE NUMBER: ,� �� 1�-.t CELL PHONE NUMBER: PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADjHmSTRATION USE ONLY PARK DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: / PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERK APPROVAL: DATE: 06/16/06 09:03 FAX 507 287 2275 -------------- 7LV-15-2006 13:37 CITY CLERK PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: OLM PLANNING DEPT. + CITY CLERK 9 005 P.05 CITY CLER%APPROVAL: DATE: Act5`C— w. 11 �-Mwtl U—� 44A 136j. Iujv- k Gs p;zz,, N w APPLICATION # 3A 60r 5 PERMIT # CO UNCIL DATE: DATE RECEIVED (D RECEIPT NUMB LR AMOUNT PAID ZpnZ S 'CD APPLICATION FOR SOUND AMPLIFICATION PERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: c - a - O L APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4TH ST. SE, ROCHESTEX MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: 6LC-� ADDRESS: r V kw p `7) 7f / JVU TELEPHONE NUMBER: ) 3 ( - a a U lFCELL PHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: � w 4 61'e . wj l bf A/w 55761 TELEPHONE NUMBER: ?oo i —CELL ELL PHONE NUMBER: 20- q -? C.Wrf(( Xr36 PURPOSE OF EVENT: c U of lw- I G r�vivr� DATE(S) OF EVENT: i 0 I - O b DAY(S)ff WEEK: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: l_ L Ut C I J" G /--4 DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: spce- , 5hoi'j MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED r �7 ` f e X) n f TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY / ] [t/ L / r� HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED START TIME: /V ,.J-� `�1vn( END TIME: f // ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) z W11 l�w-fi- aNh W- 4,,�,) o ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. ke L,5, c,,Caul%' 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) 0- (r),e tkz4,.e (� :rim Cts4c e4- by A in 4kd weU s hr� poa, r� (�1 `i 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMIJM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WANE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditiapproval imposed u n the permit that might be granted in response to his application. 77 � ^ Signature PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOLK VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARK DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: tG '� PLANNING DEPARTuENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERK APPROVAL: DATE: 275 06/`20iD6 cGGo 07rAX 507 287 t-I IT I.LtNK ROCH-OLH PLANNING DEPT. + CITY CLERK 11005 P.05 PLANNING DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: DATE: SITE PLAN - CENTRAL PARK - 2 Street & 1 Avenue NW J � I 2 sr xw PIN W d n HORSESHOE COURTS I_ N V 2 S NW i HOUSE ` BENCH 0 HERITAGE PARK AuFe >urep AAMNITIES ♦ Restrooms ♦ Horseshoes ♦ Heritage House ELECTRICAL DO NOT OVERLOAD CIRCUITS! r t Figure out the amps required for each appliance with the followin Formula: Amps(A) = Watts(W or VAl Voltsm Sometimes the amps may be list m the appliance. Add together t imps for individual appliances i ;uch a way to stay below the maximum limit per circuit safe, stay 314 amps below maximum, meaning 16-17 amps 120 amp circuit. HELTER PLAN PLUGS — — — — — — X 20 amp . circuit N 20 amp circuit i t a 26'amp.' circuit, 1 3 - Wxa') picnic tables will St 20 :amp under mofed ales n - circuit 'Each c'ucle — — — — — — i a sepoarate a accsts cimuit with _ m N so any anTs a nvice. 1. Reservations must be made through the Park and Recreation Department to assure availability of the shelter of your choice. Shelters are available for reservations from May 1- through September 30th. Reservations are taken after January 15th for that year only. 2. All athletic facilities in parks (volleyball courts, softball/baseball fields, tennis courts, horseshoe courts) are available on a first come/first: serve basis with one exception. EXCEPTION: Volleyball courts and softball/baseball fields maybe used by city and youth organizations for organized league games. These league games have priority. Volleyball courts and softball/baseball fields maybe reserved for a fee. 3. The individual whose name appears on the reservation request is responsible for any and all damage to facilities for that event and is also responsible for the group's conduct while using the facilities. 4. Many parks are located dose to residential areas. Please keep noise to a minimum The City of Rochester has an ordinance prohibiting the use of sound amplification deuces in or adjacent to a city park without a permit. Ordinance # 117.03. Sound Amplification Permits are issued by the City Clerk 5. Overnight camping is not allowed in city parks. Open bonfires are not allowed in any parks. Parks do not have grills. Bring your own 6. Parking and delivery is restricted to designated parking lots only. There is to be no driving of vehicles on sidewalks, bikeways, or on park areas. Vehicles illegally parked will be towed away at the owner's expense. 7. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES: City Ordinance # 45b.17 states: `It is unlawful for anyperson to bring upon, or to possessor consume in, a park the contents of a container of an alcoholic beverage that contains or has a capacity of two or more gallons." NO KEGS! 8. A Park Concessionaire Permit is required for the sale of merchandise, food, or beverages in city parks. 9. REFUND POLICY: Refunds will be given for cancellations received at least ten (10) days before the reservation date. NO REFUNDS WILL BE GIVEN FOR WEATHER CONDIT ONSt A written request must be made to receive a refund A $10.00 handling fee will be charged for refund processing. 10. Shelter renter shall save and hold harmless the City of Rochester, its officers, agents, employees, and members, from all claims, suits, or actions of whatsoever nature resulting from or arising out of the renting of park shelters. 11. The West Silver Lake Pavilion is kept locked at all times. Pickup a key at the Park and Recreation Department before 5.00 p.m Mondaythrough Friday. A $10.00 deposit is required when picking up the key. 12. The Three Links Shelter next to the Silver Lake Adventure Playground can be reserved from either I1:D0 a m to3:D0 p.m or 4:00 p.m to 8:00 p-m, for up to 100 people. 13. It is suggested that the renter places their reservation card at the shelter several hours before the event begins so as to alert other park users of your arrival. 5:00 am to 11:00 p.m except for Essex, Foster -Arend and Quarry Hill Parks, which close at sundown. Bear Creek (1] Central (III) Cooke (11) East Park (III) Eastwood (IIn East Silver Lake (E) Essex (I) Foster -Arend (III) Kutzky (III) Quarry Hdl (E) Slanerly(D) Soldiers Field (I) Three Links (In Watson (JI) West Silver Lake U ROCHESTER PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 201 4 STREET SE - ROOM I SO ROCHESTER, MN 55904-3769 $200 for Level I Shelters $100 for Level II Shelters $50 for Level III Shelters 'PPLICATION # 3 PERMIT# DATERECEIVED- COUNCIL DATE. RECEIPTNUMB AMOUNTPAID APPLICATIONFOR SOUND AMpLIFICATIONPER yIIT DATE OF APPLICATION: APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN CITI' CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4n' ST. SE ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: ROC$ESTER MN.55904 APPLICANT INFO �TION NAME OF APPLICANT RESPONSIBLE PARTY: HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: NAME OF ORGANIZATION. + . V14 j/ n 1 ADDRESS: ---------- NUMBER: NU : CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: HOME Al DATE OF TELEPHONE NUMBER: PURPOSE OF EVENT: DATE(S) OF EVENT: CELL PHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON INFO�TION A 'Idyj�% CELL PHONE NUMBER: J OCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: EVENTINFORNLATION i DAY(S) OF WEEK: DESCRIPTION OF ENTERT ' ---' /+INMENT TO BE PROVIDED: . 4UM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY �05� HOWWI((L''L�� ATTENlrDIANCE BELIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED (( START TIME: END TIME: ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. Z. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet IfNecessary)) i- r / 1 II f 1 It r .. 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE EVENT. (Use Additional SheetlfNecessary) THE VICINITY OF 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approva ' sed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. /7 of PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. PARK DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS. POLICE DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY 6' (SIGNATURE) 06/22/06 10:20 FAX 507 2&7 2275 JUN-20-20OG 16:11 CITY CLERK ROCH-OLM PLANNING DEPT. - CITY CLERK 1 005 P.05/06 FIREDEPARTMENT. COMMENTS. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) TURF) CITYCLEREAPPXOVAL: DATE.• 2 APPLICATION # JbC LAP, PERMIT # COUNCIL DATE. 77— 5 - 0(D DATE RECEIVED 10 " RECEIPT NUMBER to ) AMOUNT PAID $ APPLICATION FOR SOUND AMPLIFICATIONPERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION:-4 I"o 6 .APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4'H ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: AW (LAST) HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: ' �n% rCEpLL PHONE NUMBER: _ a-7s)-wi- NAME OF ORGANIZATION: �aJ�C (}:A��y1 d.1 Vil.- LYE ADDRESS: a, -/ I "XILLor,, 5� i -r w SS9v y TELEPHONE NUMBER: Wci- 04 CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION CONTACT PERSO' HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7 d - � 7 CELL PHONE NUMBER: aSD -4f xj- EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: Ii?.* --b U - It 4MIAAIt Z 1a L L. " - DATE(S) OF EVENT:A 1 DAY(S) OF WEEK: 7 LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED:pe r 616J, MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED SIB ;, , I l 86ch,:4c'r- START TIME: h s (n n M END TIME: ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT 1S SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT 7, THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the ermit that might be granted in response to his application. ^ PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. PARK DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: POLICE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY (SIGNATURE) ior�-ArA Wrrn vl 06/25/05 08:27 !'Ad S07 287 227J xucai-ULM ri.nnrvirv. unri. Uiix C. uiu P.05 JUN-22-2006 15:56 CITY CLERK: FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE% PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: CITYCLERKAPPROVAL: DATE: La i!:.r,-, 1" , N z� APPLICATION # PERMIT # COUNCIL DATE: 7 - 5 -OCn DATE RECEIVED 10 0� 'DCo RECEIPTNUMB R AMOUNT PAID S • Oo APPLICATION FOR SOUND AMPLIFICATION PERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: IC I kcI ! D(. APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4'H ST. SE, ROCHESTER, WN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORNLATIOIN NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: -N • Fko HOME ADDRESS: '-> Z'Z 3 \4 1 KN V--� cx mow_ 1� DATE OF BIRTH: 1 N�4- HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: SO i - �a(o- 1 0.5 CELL PHONE NUMBER: NAME OF ORGANIZATION: 'h SC}EcS-� ? EYE C -4BSS:�k�1L �' Y�S-�-i I 5:5-FILrS C-F S!- '�rVG-hC S ASS' S t �ie_C )v.S TELEPHONE NUMBER: s .. -1- CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF 13IR CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION (FIRST) TELEPHONE NUMBER: CELL PHONE NUMBER: "�-� � b�� -tl,.-� c.i.-w�✓.�t--�.� o�-tl-,A. �c1.e��--� P,�-R--y� t,.a.� o-P EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE O EVF ENT: DATE(S) OF EVENT: F4t,_- . o b DAY(S) OF WEEK:- cj LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED:— : R C-�- G r c t a ,-&k. l S� �c v �� Sti �_ 6L, - �tt L -,. A o� c r1 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY d�v :-c t C 0 HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED A J START TIME: (a i 3O ,w� END TIME: �'• �c7�� tL S `�-CJt �cS C�� 1. ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) '- ,�n.�c�cS..� tt_� � x...a f�'- L,n\ t fix. �h G,�-J-�-�-�-�cA. • -t e1/CSti�. E n tl iz l e eicw— cLs Fo Arm c-1 �7 G-r k;_.1•...�� cx a.t-51s Sf�J`�✓� S•��Jr 1•-.c-(~Q, is �.B.n..��L 2i�.-cti-�.7�. �� 1 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ,ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) - .So vJ.`.5+- sz-Y`-4-'V•.� LS L -u L.�F�c-�. SLYv-,re.G�l -tV o-"-'?-e-yk--c- y, dc� c... o4� s w.�� sti-,,.,ti-e% s qz-�1 1,.s t 1 b-L... .�.,0 S.:+i, ci,•�s--e� t .r t s 4 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. J WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 20:30 P.M. E \/L- . . ux1 l l� o J ✓ f L L� The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. .�-r-c-R-ram.---- U Signaia of Applicant PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6I60 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARK DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT. COMMENTS: u0140ruo 11:0`J rAA Sul ZU 2275 TUN-27-2096 13:26 CITY CLERK ROCH-OLM PLANNING DEPT. + CITY CLERK fJ005 P.25 FIRE DEPARTMENT:• COMMENTS; PLANNING DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: QTYC EAKAPPROVAL: (SIGNATURE) DATE: ,ATION ;� lilT # -It'VCIL D.9TE: DATE T_k- �TCA�UZDERECEIR AMOU?'T t'4ID APPLICATI-O7N FOR /COUND AMPLIFICATILL?V PERMIT DATE OF APpLICATION�r-(j(li t (� <, DD( APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4'H ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLIC HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: u HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: 5-0`7 971 y CELL PHONE NUMBER: 507 NAME OF ORGANIZATION: I ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: q / �- /g (o ry CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION . a C TELEPHONE NUMBER: 50'2 - ,2 S I, 9 % / / CELL PHONE NUMBER: .-rZ S/- F 7 (�� EVENT AFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: n DATE(S) OF EVENT: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: SO o2 O 1 h /Z U C r I DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED 2 / TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY 3a — /7 O ,� HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED ��n /-/t ) START TIME: : 3 -'Lz� ( c� END TIME: C a , O 0 t3- r' ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) t�T�liL�ftP� 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND APOLICE PROTECTJON FOR ADJACENT,,PROPERTY OWNERS.`Spe,ge w/ `�cwxvA 6) e.,-✓ C tltir � U. �y eo n cTn fz 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) Se-e i�lii4c�?� APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. U"AIVE THE MAXIMnI ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. ��Sigtfature 'pt d. : ' PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARKDEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS. (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT O6/29/06 11:59 FAX 507 287 2275 ROCH-OLK PLANNING DEPT. + CITY CLERK ¢j011 JLIN-23-2006 14�03 CSTY CLERK P.05 FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: DATE: c4 -1(; l� V AM l�I 9 / � a• H " p 0 0 [n y o rL � � o c � 00 m e 5 n a ° = �D 5 o ° � b�•� CL 2. Entertainment will be karaoke/ D7 provided by a professional service for a small group of close knit friends at a residential home. Food will be pot luck with cooking roasters, crock pots and electricity available to keep any foods warm. Ice and refrigeration will also be provided for cold food stuffs. Serious medical needs will be handled by local emergency services; minor medical issues will be addressed by several attending retired firefighters / emergency medical technicians. Fire services, though very unlikely needed, will be handled through 911 emergency services. Security will be unnecessary. No problems have ever been experienced within this group. Should any unexpected events arise, they will be handled through 911 emergency services. Garbage disposal will be through a local residential hauler. 4. We will attempt to ensure that local residents are not disturbed by the music. Volume will be kept below the required statutory limit of 85db. In addition, the speakers will be directed toward a non residential area (Quarry Hill Park) toward the east. As shown in the attached sketch, this is an ideal spot to hosthe event. It is bordered by woodlands to the north and east, the south is protected by a 48 foot long garage, and there are no neighbors for two blocks to the north. The house will prevent sound travel toward the west We will be willing to accept any limitations placed by the City of Rochester or law enforcement. APPLICATION# 3atOL47 PERMIT # 5;;k COUNCIL DATE: % — S — D ((e APPLICATION FOR SOUNDAMPLIFICATIONPERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4TE ST. SE, ROCHESTER, NIN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: J It� I " 1� (FIRST) (MIDDLE) (LAST) HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER CELL PHONE NUMBER: NAME OF ( ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: m - J3.,)-'Cyf 9 eKT' CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: 5-2?0—(.:o CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION til (MIDDLE) Aq R4 f l C TELEPHONE NUMBER: 7o -�) Cj I ' -3 / 3 CELL PHONE NUMBER: JJI -�J l " 34A3 EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: DATE(S) OF EVENT: ctIr' )f, - UJ 11 DAY(S) OF WEEK LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: 6€m�- s riea px�- DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: W I U, MftF - CK LY wl t h muss- (G kb A'tji -I—i� I-;Ut-Xi a-s w u. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED �? TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY � ,./ L fie HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED Ple ,III w vir 111 m (,IrI"p11E/// M16 &/ 1&-- /it !�YV R START TIME: 1. ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet Iffecessary) APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY, WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 1030 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. 6 )7r4'Wz f Signature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU [FILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6I60 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARR DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS. (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT. MOUSIAM G FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) CITY CLER%APPROVAL: DATE: APPLICATION # Q`J O PERMIT # COUNCIL DATE: -7- 5 - Q(,.) DATE OF APPLICATION: DATE RECEIVED t0 1 a I o(0 RECEIPT NUMBER AMOUNT PAID APPLICATION FOR SOUND AMPLIFICATIONPERMIT APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4Ts ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT LNFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: SG�NE; Qi,2 HOMEADDRESS: ��33 f aue t l e J p2 I�3�I+iS�Sy MN S S 94 DATE OF BIRTH: HOME TEL EPHONE NUMBER: ( S*0 -1) ll 4 3 - 0190 CELL PHONE NUMBER: (Sc i) 153 - o 18 0 NAME OF ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: 73YL %+;Q�ael V:`tw �R Q�e4s5 t (11n3 $SiO TELEPHONE NUMBER: l /Sn'1J �-&S - $ qy Lt CONTACT PERSON IINFORMATION CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: C (FIRo ST) (MIDDLE) HOME ADDRESS: 3� .3 a 4h+a--1Z 1JQ Qc 5 �, /vf . -� i 2 (LAST) DATE OF BIRTH: ) l - 39" % 3 TELEPHONE NUMBER ({S2-7) a$$ - k 4 4 t( CELL PHONE NUMBER: ( 5n -7) q s 3 - Q if 0 EVENT INFORNLATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: f N+£:C 7 4i ti w gt� T DATE(S) OF EVENT: J K,�/ �5�� DAY(S) OF WEEK: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: fi u3 �} DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: (n t oc9 L 6 fr c�5 c o � t+; n� �yt +j -f- +'1 A-1 i. v-oF }1.L B e-++,L o MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED 14 TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY. 0 o o HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED Nc- Itf[. D 1- pry a:lail4 }To4tc4}5 5.0 START TIME: 3 :0 o P, it,. END TIME: 10"30 P.M. 1. ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF TFr LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Z)se Additional Sheet IfNscessmy)) Toad - 1+" q.n. g tti i G p-; 1 1 r�+idT�c�fl! — oF.F �t4jy SA-"t�k;ox- � IOikc CPYi'.fj �SreMg: - G66,,t �Solv� 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional SheetlfNecessary) 50544-c % he g8-L of kc h1So 0 cet '}1,c 5.. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WANE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. Signature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR AD-IfTVISTRATION USE ONLY PARKDEPARTMENT. COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: FIRE DEPARTMENT. - COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: DATE. 9 71 m D O Z D 2 zz— vmmrcn rn� O D O X -<� z c o o APPLICATION # PERMIT # COUNCIL DATE: 7 — 5 — O (p DATE RECEIVED a 9 D RECEIPTNUMBER C. a c, 3 qa G AMOUNT PAID I gcj — APPLICATION FOR SO UND AMPLIFICATIONPERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4Ta ST. SE, ROCHESTER, NLN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: � � S � Sc Iti � ; d S 2 (FIRST) (MIDDLE) (LAST) HOME ADDRESS; DATE OF BIRTH: i i - 18' HOME TELEPHONE NTJMBER: Sam) °i 9 3 - o 19 0 CELL PHONE NTUN43ER: ��' 1) 9 4 3 - 0 18 D NAME OF ORGANIZATION: 0.4 r y a Q. a 9' ADDRESS: '73 5& A.-iL c,.+ v:q 02. ROcI 45a5¢ (h N 57 S' i o d. TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON LNFORNLATION CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: C G n l 4. So � tit "IS 2 HOME ADDRESS: C� - 3 } j o tK .T) (?DIDDLE) (LAST) p 2 R a- I+C S ts'L M N .S'-S—Ota 1 DATE OF BIRTH: I Lag - ? -3 TELEPHONE NUMBER: �Sa '4 "y 4K CELL PHONE NUMBER: (Sn'7) EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: C Q f I f .FtS£ —Co. c i 2* DATE(S) OF EVENT: "Y c t y DAY(S) OF WEEK: Sa_i c_2 el �j LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT:_ 4 [� P k . + 1 s Frf i 2 DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: `` s Pi ti co t,� F 4-s L 0P4r NC1 /T� 4NU 0. N AGT L MA)C UM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY # YJ 0 0 0 HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED Bel *+, L START TIME: � 1 I f:00 0:30 0.f�' CNJ ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE A[PLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) (�qoa ' Hl;r-'A—t oov- i T�Q;lx po t4 ihrtl. }.�i�iou - Qot}ti Qa�"S'�45 G4�► a 101:04, 45o[v-L SEC i.,, l2.'f`•' ' 7£c.� ;�-y co'e� 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEFS DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF' S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENTYROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet IfNecessary) sgs&kstcs 4.. -P-AS +e*ok of f►-L 4.4:IA-CL BAR ? GR:i� J w�:o4. ii glSo }v-.. C'A-'rkt 5. , APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MA)QMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WAIVE THE MA)3MUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. Signature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR AD U-TAYSTRATION USE ONLY PAR& DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: (SIGI4ATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: FIREDEPARTMENT, COMMENTS: PL4NN17vG DEP.4RT1flENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERKAPPRO VAL: DATE: m D 0 z > = zz_ -Ommru) rnj O>OX -<-izcOO APPLICATION# 3 of 65oL PERMIT # COUNCIL DATE. Q —Ej DATE OF APPLICATION: DATE RECEIVED V06 RECEIPT NUMBER AMOUNT PAID APPLICATION FOR SO1/7VD AMPLIFICA TION PERMIT APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4T" ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANTT.ESPONSIBLE PARTY: (_1 W (I IRST) SG h N4 -,1 5 IZ HOME ADDRESS: "D Q¢.Uc,��ES�trt f /✓�r 5-5-9� i DATE OF BIRTH: 73 HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: (5 n � %k 3 - o l8 o CELL PHONE NUABER: NAME OF ORGANIZATION fT1�7/t!L FJ.i a f �2; t 1n ADDRESS: �3�` (Z�an�y,4 �� KE�cI eSa b I (�L'✓ SS�t�d TELEPHONE NUMBER: (S-1) 7) d-98 '& `I `I Li CONT}ACT1 PERSON WFORBIATION CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: A, s-, L, -a : cL 5 2 �� 3 3 C I DIE) (LAST) HOME ADDRESS: ) ar. �s < 2 6�� s Sic t m i- , s-S 9 o 1 DATE OF BIRTH: f - - ? 3 TELEPHONE NUNMER: —150-�) C4 Fr' 8'-I V i CELL PHONE NUMBER: (sc-I) R qL 3 - o } 0 EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: -f. r -- + DATE(S) OF EVENT: (t�q �s N S DAY(S) OF WEEK: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: i. " 'fit, ops� rS %7.;4' 15 s 5 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED 4 TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY C0 9 HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED B J o-k AV,k a,b ti +--, I-, sold START TIME: S ` 0 0 �~ END TIME: t D : 3 `? 2. n . 1. ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) J oQnA - 144-0-5A-c' ffh?d caL - a^R-, i�'7 eaf-"-.A cs e02'-k ¢3*75-5 b� s G la b.,,l , �s.sa l u %- Ss c r- ' A —I - 5 £c —: ±4 c a�(—r14ti-/ 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (E)se Additional SheetlfNecessary) Q 627L1 1.,c, cs �0G4Gsa 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VEND BOUNDARY. WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. Signature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARS DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: DATE: w a a o c w CD � ;cDG)z>m zz- -ommr-O rn� O D O A -<� Z C O o APPLICATION # 3 (o PERMIT # 55 CO UNCIL DATE. -7 - 5 - 0 f io DATE OF APPLICATION: D.ATEREMVED —0 RECEIPT NUMB R AMOUNT PAID APPLICATION FOR SO UND AMPLIFICATIONPERMIT APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,_'01 4TH ST. SE, ROCBESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: C 11-i A. So hT"t' ciS 2 (FIRST) UN41DDLE) (LAST) HOME ADDRESS: (,�3,3 �0, Dv�0cL-4i7LT2 /K r 4 S' S'`t a I DATE OF BIRTH: I I a- sr - 7 HOME TEL EPHONTE NUMBER: S �) a % 3 -ppot & 0 CELL PHONE NUMBER: (S 07) Q 13 - NAME OF ORGANIZATION: CL i> 32 S ADDRESS:_ 738(- / 7y-Dari - D2 Qn�o,5cL, p1j,-.� e-s-gocL TELEPHONEN-UNIBER:—PO4. a&9-9gvy . CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: HOME ADDRESS: � X 3 3 CONTACT PERSON IIN'FOR&LATION ctlA jA- (FIRST) jMIDDLE) a t- T t. 00 21--s c +SG DATE OF BIRTH: ) L - d4- - 7 3 TELEPHONE NUMBER: JC 52 -7) 4,t - S 4 u `I CELL PHONE NUMBER: EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: C N �.r �,'N's,. - (LAST) S a-7 ) A °c 3 -9 A, 0 DATE(S) OF EVENT: At=- U-s J' 1 d-"� n DAY(S) OF WEEK: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: 14,1-/- otra- r- 4.IeA t }a y 2 DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: (r, 5 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY %00 HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED Qom( wrwiO10- a i ry CGtc''rS 501� START TIME: END TIME: 1 p' 3 o Q. rn ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) coed — 0trt,5 g-1� r,zd:«L - 54c4"a 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THEEVENT. (Use Additional SheetlfNecessary) 1i 6A y S `J �'D y r a.¢.�S .1 }"t L (7 C rLS - ,.� N't%C N -L -' /1-Q 11rxfL� 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY, Y WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. Signature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: S25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARK DEPARTMENT. - (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPAREVENT- COMMENTS. FIRE DEPART_UENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) PL.41V�7NG DEPARTMENT. - COMMENTS. (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: s o a a m mCD X Y 0 Z D 2 zz- -0mmrCl) a» 0 DOS -< -iz c 0 0 APPLICATION # 3acoV 1 PERMIT # 14-7 COUNCIL DATE: DATE RECEIVED - -Qb RECEIPTNUMBER r 0(09093 AMOUNT PAID 0 APPLICATION FOR SOUND AMPLIFICATIONPERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: o APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4' ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: HOME ADDRESS: 17 Z / .0 6-0 A !1 L- SC / &C� eJAte /n 4 --Ma/ DATE OF BIRTH: / Z l .c3 HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: 2 S 2. / / 7 NAME OF ORGANIZATION 4e CELL PHONE NUMBER: Z 1732 I( - ADDRESS: D 12 S 131-o/ l e. 12 ty q )6c c f1c /e- /%114 ST 2' e 2 8 i TELEPHONE NUMBER: `�Q/ 0 CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION l j CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: Pie 6 ogey (f l'qj y� y / q I- / HOME ADD DATE OF BIR RESS: 7 Z / [o OF h5T)� U� �IDDLE)n C��'LAST TH: I: ��C! y TELEPHONE NUMBER: Z !S-Z 7 �7 CELL PHONE NUMBER - S / 7 EVENT INFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: y T17Z e,7 / /CO,1'% Y{eJ / DATE(S) OF EVENT: / Z / / O-y(�� ,� /� DAY(S) OF WEEK:C�[ LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: 0 � ! 6) 4 I 12Cl e' `ci e'1 S )c T DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: D , i -t4 Z-e" i-7 60 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED /� TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY n HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED DAL V�l+3 �1 START TIME: Ip 0 0 /_ /-)q END TIME: %(00 le"-n ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) (G ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4, PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessar)) L,(�o n� ►� r� �� 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY, WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARK DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: 'I1 (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: O6/26/06 08:26 FAI 507 287 2275 ` 14 1H CITY CLERK JUN-22-2006 DEPT, CITY CLERK 90 P. 05/a5 FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) CITYCLERKAPPROVAL: DATE: TOTPL P.05 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 7/5/06 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. Reports and Recommendations City Clerk F-- 2 t t t:M DESCRIPTION: Sound Amplification - ADDENDUM PREPARED BY: Judy Scherr The following Sound Amplification Permit Requests are submitted for your approval. The permits have been approved by the Rochester Police Department; approval by all other City departments is pending. Maximum Sound of 85 Decibels Rochester Golf and Country Club Outside Pool Party July 14, 2006 — 7:00 to 11:00 PM Rochester Golf and Country Club Outside Pool Party July 27, 2006 — 7:00 to 11:00 PM COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED A motion to approve the Sound Amplification r ,,JUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: APPLICATION # 3 0P fD cb (O PERMIT # 'j 7 COUNCIL DATE. -7 DATE RECEIVED —7! S 10(n RECEIPT NUMBER AMOUNTPAID -7a9-FO APPLICATIONFOR SOUND AMPLIFICATIONPERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: - APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4"H ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/RESPONSIBLE PARTY: )-ZG ( 1, C, bG Lid ro 1-1(FIRST) - (MIDDLE) (LAST) HOME ADDRESS: Lti aces (� W DATE OF BIRTH: i - I lD - (-C 5 HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER: 2-09 Z7 1 CELL PHONE NUMBER: ZS ' Ll NAME OF ORGANIZATION: 7�3 ( �` "� l Jl" ,b ADDRESS: 2-ACC TELEPHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON DU6RING EVENT: I� � I/ kcr � m) (LAST) HOMEADDRESS: Il L/SL;R''PL4.1 I ne DATE OF BIRTH: TELEPHONE NUMBER: q7 ' ,28 2 - 2-lI 6 ?1 CELL PHONE NUMBER: f� �/ / 1 EVENTTINFORMATION PURPOSE OF EVENT: Lk ik DATE(S) OF EVENT: �j 1� % , L — DAYq OF WEEK: �,(,(C{,es t01f• LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: I�[ (1 n) ��j�(� (T (� X�u- I\p f, {ti DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: �� r7 Lao) - I lrL,Y1 ' ` nQCEAru-h 1 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED START TIME: T 6`` 6 aww'�— END TIME: —r � L'Lr�t�,} C I �/ ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. 2. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary)) (3-• L 3. ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. 4. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) r- e 16- r,- '� S r i CAC 0"k , e - v * ,c 's 5. APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WANE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. gnature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY PARK DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) POLICE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT.• COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: DATE: RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF GOVERNMENT DATA "TENNESSEN WARNING" In accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices .Act, the City of rochester is required to inform you of your rights as they pertain to the information collected about you. Public information is that information which is available to the general public; Private information is that information which is available to you, not to the public: and confidential information is that information which is not available to you or the public. The information we collect from you is either public or private. The separation of that information is as follows: PUBLIC - NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S) PRIVATE - ALL OTHER INFORMATION COLLECTED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION, ALL INFORMATION BECOMES PUBLIC AFTER APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION The information collected and required from you is to determine your eligibility for a City of Rochester regulatory license. If you do not supply the required information, the City of rochester will not be able to determine your eligilibility. The dissemination and use of the private data we collect is limited to that necessary for the administration and management of regulatory licenses. Persons or agencies with whom this information may be shared include. CITY AND COUNTYPERSONNEL INVOLVED 17VDETERMEQNG YOUR ELIGIBILITY, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION, CONTRACTED PUBLICAVDITORSAND THOSE INDIVIDUALS TO WHOM YOU GIVE YOUR EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION. Unless otherwise authorized by state statute or federal law, other government agencies utilizing the reported private data must also treat the information private. You may wish to exercise your rights as contained in the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. These rights include: . THE RIGHT TO SEE AND OBTAIN COPIES OF THE DATA MAINTAINED ON YOU. THE RIGHT TO BE TOLD THE CONTENTS AND MEANING OF THE DATA. THE RIGHT TO CONTEST THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE DATA. To exercise these rights, contact the City Clerk's Office, Room135, City Hall, Rochester, Mn. 55904 I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE ABOVE INFORMATION REGARDING MY RIGHTS AS A SUBJECT OF GOVERNMENT DATA. 7 zzg oG (Signature of Data Subject) (Date) White Copy - city Clerk's Office Buff Copy - Applicant APPLICATION # 3 a s PERMIT # COUNCIL DATE: i - 'aLP DATERECEIVED RECEIPT NUMBER % AMOUNT PAID • om APPLICATION FOR SOUND AMPLIFICATION PERMIT DATE OF APPLICATION: -7- J APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF EVENT TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 201 4' ST. SE, ROCHESTER, MN. 55904 APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(RESPONSIBLE PARTY: I r (FIRST) (MIDDLE) (LAST) HOME ADDRESS: I lF r 1 1I} tV/J�1 �JCS1 �J� Iy: DATE OF BIRTH: `�' I �L - Io 5 ' r HOME TELEPHONE NUMBER 4,Z) ^ ZED Cl - 2D) 9 CELL PHONE NUMBER: e�n - 2661 NAME OF ORGANIZA ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: ;M -2,02- % -7d V CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION r CONTACT PERSON DURING EVENT: (LAST) HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIR TELEPHONE NUMBER: CELL PHONE NUMBER: PURPOSE OF EVENT: �,"^ V DATE(S) OF EVENT: �(1 2±Y ' ,, ZOO 1L' DAY(S) OF WEEK: LOCATION OF SPECIAL EVENT: (J( 1 J 4' o p i 3 'i I (\ DESCRIPTION OF ENTERTAINMENT TO BE PROVIDED: MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE PERMITTED TO BE IN ATTENDANCE ON ANY PARTICULAR DAY HOW WILL ATTENDANCE BE LIMITED TO THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INDICATED START TIME: "7ii Q ]�' L END TIME: . m O n^- 2. 3. Q L---1 1 / (Hall ATTACH A SKETCH, SITE PLAN, STAGE PLOT OR OTHER DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND AND PREMISES TO BE USED FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT. BE SPECIFIC AS TO THE PLACEMENT OF SOUND SYSTEM SPEAKERS AND THE DIRCTION THE SOUND WILL TRAVEL. PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF THE FACILITIES AND ARRANGEMENTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE HANDLING OF FOOD, MEDICAL NEEDS, SANITATION, FIRE SERVICES, GARBAGE DISPOSAL, AND SECURITY INCLUDING CROWD CONTROL AND TRAFFIC CONTROL. (Use Additional Sheet IfA7ecessary)) ATTACH A WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE OR THE CHIEF'S DESIGNEE STATING THAT, IN THE CHIEF'S OPINION, APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SECURITY AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR THE EVENT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT IS SOUGHT INCLUDE CROWD CONTROL, TRAFFIC CONTROL AND POLICE PROTECTION FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. PROVIDE THE MEANS AND METHODS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT NOISE FROM THE EVENT FROM UNREASONABLY DISTURBING THOSE PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE EVENT. (Use Additional Sheet If Necessary) APPLICANT REQUESTS THE COUNCIL TO IMPOSE THE FOLLOWING SOUND LIMITATION (Check One) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL NO MORE THAN 85 DECIBELS MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR VENUE BOUNDARY. WAIVE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL AND REQUIRE THE AMPLIFIED SOUND TO TERMINATE NO LATER THAN 10:30 P.M. The Applicant hereby agrees that a copy of Rochester Code of Ordinances 117 has been provided with the application and that the Applicant has read and does understand the regulations found within the Ordinance, and does intend to comply with the regulations found within the Ordinance and any conditions of approval imposed upon the permit that might be granted in response to his application. /gignature of Applicant PERMIT FEE: $25.00 YOU WILL NEED TO CHECK WITH THE PARK DEPARTMENT AT 281-6160 TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED PARK DEPARTMENT PERMITS IF YOU ARE HOLDING YOUR VENUE ON PARK DEPARTMENT PROPERTY. PARR DEPARTMENT. COMMENTS: POLICE DEPARTMENT. COMMENTS: FOR ADMINISTRATION USE ONLY (SIGNATURE) A T77R F1 FIRE DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) PLANNING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: (SIGNATURE) CITY CLERKAPPROVAL: RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF GOVERNMENT DATA "TENNESSEN WARNING" In accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, the City of rochester is required to inform you of your rights as they pertain to the information collected about you. Public information is that information which is available to the general public; Private information is that information which is available to you, not to the public: and confidential information is that information which is not available to you or the public. The information we collect from you is either public or private. The separation of that information is as follows: PUBLIC - NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT(S) PRIVATE - ALL OTHER INFORMATION COLLECTED AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION; ALL INFORMATION BECOMES PUBLIC AFTER APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION The information collected and required from you is to determine your eligibilityfor a City of Rochester regulatory license. If you do not supply the required information, the City of rochester will not be able to determine your eligilibility. The dissemination and use of the private data we collect is limited to that necessary for the administration and management of regulatory licenses. Persons or agencies with whom this information may be shared include: CITY AND COUNTY PERSONNEL INVOLVED 12V DETERIATINING YOUR ELIGIBILITY, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION, CONTRACTED PUBLIC AUDITORS AND THOSE INDIVIDUALS TO WHOM YOU GIVE YOUR EATRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION. Unless otherwise authorized by state statute or federal law, other government agencies utilizing the reported private data must also treat the information private. You may wish to exercise your rights as contained in the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. These rights include: THE RIGHT TO SEE AND OBTAIN COPIES OF THE DATA MAINTAINED ON YOU. THE RIGHT TO BE TOLD THE CONTENTS AND MEANING OF THE DATA. THE RIGHT TO CONTEST THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE DATA. To exercise these rights, contact the City Clerk's Office, Room135, City Hall, Rochester, Mn. 55904 I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE ABOVE INFORMATION REGARDING MY RIGHTS AS A SUBJECT OF GOVERNMENT DATA. J ZZ I S of Data Subject) (Date) White Copy - city Clerk's Office Buff Copy - Applicant REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION rltj / MEETING DATE: 07/05/06 GENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: ITEM NO. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Public Works ITEM DESCRIPTION: AWARD OF BID. (J7749) PREPARED BY: 1$' Avenue SW from Center Street to 2"d Street SW Y D. son n Bids were received and opened after 11:00 a.m., June 28, 2006 for the following local improvement: Project: City No. J7749 Reconstruct 15t Avenue SW from Center Street to 2"d Street SW Project Background: The project consists of reconstructing 1 s' Avenue SW a concrete street from Center Street to 2nd Street SW. Work will include: new concrete pavement, new sidewalks, curb and gutter, new watennain, parking improvements, and street trees, grates, and lighting. This project is included in the 2006 -2011 Capital Improvement Program, item #24, page 36. Funding for the project will be from assessments to the abutting property owners, water utility funds, and tax levy. The following bids were received: 1 Elcor Construction 1 $ 692.963.23 2 Road Constructors, Inc. $ 706,791.63 3 Blitz Construction $ 781,879.02 4 Pember Co. $ 782,395.35 ENGINEERS ESTIMATE $ 69A 703.00 Project Recommendation: The Public Works Department recommends the City Council proceed with an award to the low bidder. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution awarding the contract, (J7749) Reconstruction of 1" Avenue SW from Center Street to 2"d Street SW to Elcor Construction. COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second by: to: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ,ENDA SECTION: '.SOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE G. 2. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES, as appropriate. MEETING DATE: 7/5J ITEM NO. G TERR_ X lam. ADKINS G. 3. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (for adoption). a) An Ordinance Amending And Reenacting Section 64Q.100 Of The Rochester Code Of Ordinances, Relating To The Harvestview II Special District. Said property is located on the North side of 55 Street NW, South of Douglas Trail and West of Harvest Moon Boulevard NW. j, b) An Ordinance Amending And Reenacting Section 7.06 Of The Home Rule Charter Of The City Of Rochester, Relating To The Establishment Of Elected Officials Compensation. G.4. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Motion by: Second to: