Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-07-19841 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL 2187 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular,Meeting No. 35�May 7, 19R4 Agenda Item A-1 President Postier called the meeting to order at 2:00 P.M., the following members being present: President Postier, Aldermen Allen, Bluhm, Duffy, Powers, Solinger and Strain. Absent: None. Powers moved, Duffy second to approve the minutes of the April 16 and 18, 1984 meeting. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. C-1 Wishing.to be heard was Mr. David Adams of Rochester, Minnesota regard ing the Mayor's Veto of the Federal Prison Environmental Statement ( Lawsuit.). He is opposed to the Federal Prison being located on the former Rochester State Hospital grounds and gave the following reasons: 1. The.Federal Prison facility would be located in the middy of 64acres is a residential area. He stated that the Federal prison in Butner N. C. has 42 acres fenced in the middle of 700 acres. He stated that Springfield has a prison in the middle of 327 acres. These areas do not have residential areas near them. Mr. Adams asked that the Council listen to these statistics and urged the,Council to over- ride the Mayor's veto and continue with the lawsuit. Alderman Strain asked the Council to consider this item at the evening Council meeting e stated that this is such an intense issue, and by considering this in the evening session, this would allow more people to attend that fight be interested and are otherwise working during the day. With his suggestion, Strain moved, Duffy .second to table this until the �vening session. Ayes (5), Nays (2). Alderman Allen and Solinger oting nay. Motion carried. C-2 Solinger moved, Allen second to approve the Mayor's appoi.ntment of arren W. Zimmerman of 1690 7 112 Ave. N. E. to the Mayor's Advisory ommi.ttee on Alcohol and Drug Abuse. This was created by the resign- ation of Dahna Ihrke. Ayes (7), Nays (0)._Motion carried. D-1 lowers moved, Strain second to adopt Resolution No. 231-84 referring he petition received from Harold and Bernice Buske of 1809 lst Ave. . W. and Wendy Ryan of 1813 lst Avenue S. W. for sewer and water ervice.to the Public Services Department for a feasibility report. yes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. D-2 Bl!uhm moved, Duffy second to adopt Resolution No. 232-84 referring the petition received from Rochester Block and Supply Co.', Lowell Penz, President for Water supply and distribution system, well and appurtenances, pump and pump house to serve the property in Willow Creek Sewer District. Ayes (7); Nays (0). Motion carried. D-3 Allen moved, Solinger second to adopt Resolution No. 233-84 referring he petition received from Mr. Robert Elmen for the following mprovements: 1. Extension of Frontage Road, East side, Highway 52 N. north of 55th Street N. W., to its intersection with Bandel Road at north line, Cascade Ridge Subd. 2. Extension of Sanitary Sewer main o northern extent of Frontage Road improvements. This is referred to he Public Services Department for a feasibility report. byes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. 2188 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item E-1 This item will be held until 3:00 P.M. E-2 Strain moved, Bluhm second to approve the following option as follows for the Storm Drainage Improvements in Glendale Subdivision. "The City would require the developers to assume the drainage expenses for Glendale Subdivision, but would credit the developer with the expenses previously assessed to the property for drainage improvemetn! made to other properties. In effect, the City would be assuming the previous assessment expenses. The assessment expenses are in the approximate amount of $33,000.00. The City.- will participate in 1/2 the cost of the Storm pipe crossing the intersection: Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-3 Bluhm moved, Strain second to adopt Resolution No. 234-84 establishin the values of just compensation for potential acquisition of property which would be utilized for the East River Parking area. The values are as follows: 125 Third Street S. E. $48,000.00; 121 Third Street S. E. $34,000.00 and 303-317 First Avenue S.E. $43,000.00. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-4 3olinger moved, Duffy second to instruct the City Attorney to prepare n ordinance whereby the City of Rochester would be authorized to cleat p rubbish from private property and assess the costs of the clean- p back to the property owner as a special assessment. Ayes (7), lays (0). Motion carried. E-5 uffy moved, Allen second to adopt Resolution No. 235-84 authorizing he acquisition of property owned by George Baihly located in Section 0 of Rochester Township and Outlot A, Baihly Woodland. This appraisa' ame to the following amounts $15,000. for the Water Tower Site and 8,500.00 for the Wall House Side. The total is $23,500.00. This lso authorized the Mayor and the City."V erk to execute the purchase greement. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-6 3olinger moved, Allen second to adopt Resolution No. 236-84 approving n agreement with McGhie and Betts for Engineering services for the ochester Municipal Airport for Runway 13/31 Reconstruction. The ayor and the City Clerk are authorized to execute all documents ertaining to the project. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-7 Allen moved, Strain second to adopt Resolution No. 237-84 authorizing :he City Clerk'to advertise for bids on the Hangar Area Taxiway and ,oad Construction at the Rochester Municipal Airport. The estimated :ost of the project is $179,402.00.The City share would be $59,801.00. lids to be opeendd on June 1, 1984 at 11:00 A.M. Ayes (7), Nays (0). lotion carried. 1 1 Agenda Item E-9 E-10 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Duffy moved, Strain second to approve the following License & Bonds: Request for a Single Gambling License to hold a raffle on June 13, 1984 was received from the Women's Association of Minnesota Orchestra They requested the $10,000. bond be waived. Request for 3.2 beer Temporary On -Sale was received from the Rochester Police Benevolent Association for their sponsored Rodeo on June 8,9, and 10, 1984 at the fairgrounds. Request for a Single Dance to be held at the Labor Club on May 12, 1984 received from Mr. and Mrs. Edward Hanenberger, Jr. Request for a license to Construct Cement Sidewalks, Curb and Gutters. and Driveways in the City.of Rochester for a period ending Dec. 31, 1984 recieved from Don Walchak, Winona, Minnesota. Request for a Temporary 3.2 beer license received from the Olmsted County DFL Party for May 19, 1984. Request for approval of the application to sell Cigarettes at Retail (over the counter ) received from Donald Kruger and Lewis M. Schoppers of Huey's Cigar Store at 330 South Broadway. Request for a Heating, Ventilating and Air -Conditioning license and -.a Master Installers License for the same received from James Gander, Superior Plumbing and Heating, Rochester, Minnesota. The license is for a period ending December 31, 1984. Mr. Gander also requests approval of a Master Plumbers License. Request received for a license to construct Cement Sidewalks, Curb and Gutters and Driveways in the City of Rochester .from William R. Thiemann of B & D Concrete. Request received from Godfather's Pizza of 1611 16th Street N. W. for an Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor license.' Request received from the Rochester Art Center for approval of their applicatl for a Temporary On -Sale 3.2 beer license for June 3, 1984. Request received for an application for an On -Sale Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquc 3.2 beer license for the Cellar Restaurant.located in the Campbell Hol at 302 Second Avenue S. W. Request received from Jim Byrne Construct- ion of Stewartville, Minnesota for an application to construct Cement Sidewalks, Curb and Gutters and Driveways in the City of Rochester. The'`p'eriod ends December 31, 1984.. The following renewal licenses have been submitted: Cigarettes - Vending machines -(25) - Auctioneer -(1), Cement Sidewalks, Curb and Gutters and Driveways - (3). Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. ;train moved, Duffy second to approve the issuance of an On -Sale Wine License to Campbell Hotel, Inc. located -at 302 Second Avenue S. W. This is pending receipt of the insurance and bonds. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. 31uhm moved, Strain second to approve the request from Mr. Lorne Grosse operating the Street Treets Concessions on City streets and sidewalks He is also negotiating a contract with the Park Department at this times. Ayes,(7), Nays (0). Motion carried. on r el .219® RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item E-11 E-12 E-13 E-14 E-15 E-16 E-17 E-18 E-19 B.luhm moved, Duffy second to approve the request received from Struve Paints for their annual sale to be held on June 22, and 23rd at 501 North Broadway. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Solinger moved, Strain second to approve the request of the Olmsted County Memorial Association for a Memorial Day parade on May 28, 1984 from 9:15 A.M. to 10:45 P.M. This has been approved. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Bluhm moved, Powers second to approve the request submitted by the Meadow Park Church of Christ to hold a parade on June 10, 1984 as a kick-off for their vacation bible school. Ayes (7). Nays (0). Motion carried. Allen moved, Strain second to approve the request for a Walk-A-Thon for the National League of Families of POW's-MIA for May 19, 1984. The Police have approved of the route. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Bluhm moved, Strain second to approve the request for a lot split on Plat 3869 Parcel 00302 - Villa Meadows Replat. This was referred to the Public Services Department for calculation. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Powers moved, Duffy second to approve the semi-monthly Accounts Payable in the amount of $957,789.84 ( list attached ). Ayes (5), Nays (2). Alderman Allen and Solinger voting nay. The reason as stated was the bill that was submitted to LeFevere/Lef/Ken/0'Br/Dra- for Legal consultation in the Prison issue. The bill is in the amount of $21,076.05. Motion carried. Strain moved, Solinger second to adopt Resolution No. 238-84 author- izing the awarding of the low bid of $65.50 per.ton for pebble quicklime for the Water Reclamation Plant. This is with Cutlar-Magnar of Duluth, Minnesota. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Solinger moved, Bluhm second to adopt Resolution No. 239-84 authorizin the Director Employee Relations to sign an agreement with Rochester Community College. This:.allows the City of Rochester to employ student -whoqualify on a part-time basis while attending school. The students are paid $3.90 per hour to $4.00 by the Eol:lege and the City is billed for 20% (.78V .80¢ per hr. ). Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Solinger moved, Strain second to adopt -Resolution No. 240-84 setting a date of June 18, 1984 for a hearing on the Petition to vacate a portio of 1st St. N. W. , 2nd Avenue N. W., and alleys in the "Superblock" north of Methodist Hospital. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-20 Bluhm moved, Allen second to instruct the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance approving the Petition to Annex Lot 23 of Oak Hills Sub. and the Adjacent Right - of - Way for T.H. 63. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. I. Agenda Item E-21 E-22 E-23 E- 24 E-25 E-26 E- 27 E-28 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Wishing to speak on behalf of the Petition to annex property at 1620 6th Avenue S. W. was Walter Paulson.of 1626 6th Avenue S. W. The Council accepted the request to allow this person to address the Council.. Mr. Paulson stated that he wished this project would be dropped at the present time. The only reason that he wanted to be annexed was so that he could receive sewer and water, etc. Since that time, he has corrected his problem and would like to drop this request. Powers moved, Solinger second to drop the project. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Bluhm moved, Strain second to instruct the City Attorney to prepare Resol 240A-84initiating the proceedings in accordance with the Orderly Annexation Agreement on 10 acres of vacant land east of Cas- cade Ridge Subdivision ( Mr. Harvey Ratzloff ) - representing the Calvary Free Church - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Powers moved, Allen second to adopt Resolution No. 241-84 approving the conveyance of Metes and Bounds a lot South of Home Federal Savings and Loan in Crossroads Shopping Center. This is located in Sec. 11, Township 106 N Range 14 West. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Duffy moved, Allen second to adopt Resolution No. 242-84 approving an Engineering proposal for work on Project No. 7808-2-84 J 8854 Grading, base, bituminous paving, concrete curb and gutter, sewers, watermains, lift station and forcemain and service connections in Parkwood Hills Second Sub. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Powers moved, Allen second to adopt Resolution No. 243-84 approving an Engineering agreement with Yaggy Associates for Project No. 6257- 83 J 8569 - This is an amendment adjusting to the current hourly rates. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Allen moved, Powers second to -.table the request to order a hearing on Project; No. 8406-1-84 `J, 8860 - Construction of Streets, -Concrete Curb and Gutter,-Sani_tary Sewer, St6,rm Sewer, _Watermain and Service Connections in Manor Woods West First -Sub. The hearing was schedules to -.be June.4, 1984. Alderman Allen wanted to be -sure a general de'velopment plan. was submitted, with Roger- Plumb, -Public Services Director before this was approved. This will- be, tabled:until after fhh Ie B-8 is .co sidered at this evenings meeting. Ayes'_(7), Nays Og. Ao ion carrier Bluhm moved, Solinger second to adopt Resolution No. 245-84 ordering a hearing to be held on.June 4, 1984 on'Project No. 8407 J 8861 Construction of a frontage Road located between 57th Street N. W. and Bandel Road. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Solinger moved, Bluhm second to adopt Resolution No. 246-84 approving the following schedule of rates to be established at the Statuary Park ing Lot - Daily $1.25 , Monthly $26.00, Event $1.00. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. 2JL91 2192 RECORD -OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Reqular Meetinq No. 35 - Mav 7. 1984 Agenda Item E-29 Bluhm moved, Powers. second to table the request for parking removal on N. Broadway; 8th Street to 12th Street. Wishing to be heard was Mr. Jeff Hoog who represented the business on 917 No. Broadway. and several other businesses along that street. They were opposed to this as they had businesses and they would have no place for the customer to park. The Alderman agreed to table this and talk about the matter at a Committee of the Whole meeting. -Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-30 Bluhm moved, Solinger second to adopt Resolution No. 247-84 adding paragraph (16) to Section H of the Limited Parking Zones : Zone F (2 hour parking ) as follows : (16) - Northern .Hills Dr-. N. E. on the north side, from Broadway to a point 300 feet east, more or east of Broadway between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Mondays thru Saturday. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-31 1131uhm moved, Allensecond to adopt Resolution No. 248-84 approving the following Resolutions of the Public Uility Board: A purchase order agreement with United Electric Corp. for luminaires, lamps, and streetlight standards. The amount to be $185,815.65. Resolution No. 249-84 approving a purchase order with Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. for luminaires at a cost of $20,730.00.. Resolution Nb. 250-84 approving an engineering services agreement witt Black and Veatch Engineers, Inc. for study , etc for repair of Silver Lake Plan Unit # 4 Feedwater Heater. The fee not to exceed $21,300.00. Resolution No. 251-84 approving an engineering services agreement wits Black and Veatch Engineers, Inc. for services ( engineering ) for sulfur dioxide monitors at the Silver Lake Powers Plant. The amount not to exceed $40,000.00. Resolution No. 252-84 approving a purchase order with Fairfield Engineering Co. for chains for Unit No. 4 Coal equipment. The amount of the order $16,833.60. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-32 Allen moved, Strain second to approve.the request for a transfer of 3.2 On -Sale License for the Second Street Deli -Regal Cafe. This was formerly owned by Wally Klopp and the new oener is August Ferdinand. The address is 1239 Second Street S. W. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. E-33 Rluhm moved, Strain second to approve the transfer of the ownership change of the LeBistro Cafe of 416 South. Broadway to LeBistro, Inc. of Minneapolis. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. s, G-1 Duffy moved, Bluhm second to remove the Request for a Variance from S to Fire Marshall's Order on the Maxwell Guest House from the table. 1 es (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL 2JL23 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7 , 1984. Agenda Item G-1 After discussion by the Council, and consulting with Ross Parker of the Rochester Fire Department, the Aldermen concluded that no other place would be secured for a fire exit except to vacate a room or someplace on the first floor of the Maxwell Guest House for the'fire exit as requested by the Fire Marshall. Having no further comments. Duffy moved, Strain second to deny the request for the variance. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Resolution No. 253-84 was adopted instructing the Fire Marshall that the variance was denie, F-1 An Ordinance Annexing to the City of Rochester platted land in Oak Hills Addition in Rochester Township- Lot 23 together with the adjacent ROW of TH 63 lying between an ext. of the N.and S..lines of Lot 23 to the east ROW line of TH 63 was given its first reading. ( 2.40 acres ). F-1 An Ordinance Annexing approximately .95 acres of land in Rochester Township, portions of Lots 5 & 6, Block 15, Golden Hill Addition was given its second reading. Powers moved, Allen second to adopt the Ordinance as; read. Ayes. (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 An Ordinance annexing approximately .5 acres of unplatted land in Haverhill Township on the north side of Viola Road was given its second reading. Duffy moved, Solinger second to adopt the Ordinance as read. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 An Ordinance annexing approximately 5.0 acres of land in Rochester Township Lots 1,2,3,5,6,8,9, and 10 of Toogood Terrace was given its second reading. Duffy moved, Allen second to adopt the Ordinance as read. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 An Ordinance Rezoning to B-lb and revoking previous PUD Designation known as PUD-R-36 ( Real Estate Center. Subdivision : 18th Avenue N. W and 37th Street N. W. was given its second reading. Bluhm moved, Solinger second to adopt the Ordinance as read. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 An Ordinance Relating to Zoning ; Changing the designation of certain lands located near the Mayo Civic Auditorium from the Floodway to Floc Fringe District; Amending Ordinance No. 1659 was given.its first . reading. Allen moved, Bluhm second to suspend the rules and give thi! ordinance a second reading. Upon Roll call vote, Aldermen Allen, Bluhn Duffy, Powers, Solinger, Strain.and President Postier voted aye. Ayes (7), Nays (0)..,Motion carried and the Ordinance was given its second reading. Powers moved, Strain.second to adopt the Ordinance as read. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 Allen moved, Strain second to authorize the Floodproofing of the Mayo Civic Auditorium. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 Allen moved, Strain second to adopt Resolution No. 254-84 approving a owner contract prepared by Yaggy Assoc. for Green Meadows Partnership; Fraser Const. and Shamrock Ent. for Basic Const. in Baihly Woodland Third Sub. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. n 2194 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item A-1 E-1 Allen moved, Duffy second to adjourn the meeting for 10 minutes and then go to Item No. E-1 Eyes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. President Postier called the meeting to order at 3:00 P.M., the following members being present: President Postier, Aldermen Allen, Bluhm, Duffy, Powers, Solinger and Strain. Absent : None. Consideration was given for the issuance of a 3.2 Beer License for Eastside Inn located at 826 4th Street S. E. The Council had to consider the memorandum from the City Attorney outlining the illegal activities which have allegedly taken place at this establishment. This license is up for renewal. Wishing to be heard was Mr. Fred Suhler, City Attorney and presented the case and how this particular issue would be handled. He had three members of the Rochester Police Department present and had :contacted Mr. Art Knutson of the twin cities. to testify. However, Mr. Knutson had to work and did not attend this hearing. Wishing to be heard for the Eastside Inn was Terry Maus, Attorney for the owner*/.applicant Mr. Jerry Herman of Rochester, Minnesota. Mr. Maus reminded the Council that the only person that could testify to the actual gambling procedure was Mr. Knutson and he wasnot present. He stated that no arrest or convict- ion of the present owner has been made. Mr. Maus asked that the Council consider the written testimony of Mr. Knutson be stricken from the record as he was no present for Mr. Maus to cross examine hir After numerous testimony of Mr. Herman from Mr. Maus, Mr. Fred Suhler stated that the allegations were only of the gambling activity and that is the single issue that the Council has before them today.. Mr. Maus chose not to question the police officers present. Mr. Maus cleared up the official name of the owner/applicant. Mr. ucr I y ncr nian i b a r dU I V Ur-UdaGd the owner/applicant is Herman J Mayo High School for the past 1 Mr. Herman stated that he did k for money. He also stated that was employed as a bartender and night in question. Mr. Herman to be used for ball clubs, etc. manner and took beer down there only for fun. Alderman Powers now. He stated that for years tl Suhler stated that they can be i Allen asked if they had a machii no, not at this time. Presiden- gree with what Mr. Knutson sta, it was in conflict and he would questioned the disposition of Mi e was not charged with any offE e was not intoxicated. But, he as Randy Branick of Rochester, t the Eastside the night in quE as played poker in this establi OLIng name ana Lnaz Lne real name of !rome Smudy. He has been a teacher of I years. After further questioning. iow of card games being played, but not another person involved - Randy Branick worked one month. He was present the tated that he had this basement room when they wanted to gather in a social (basement ). Cards were played, but sked if the bar was E`losed at 1:00 A.M e bar closed at 11:00 P.M. Mr. pen until 1:00 A.M. now. Alderman e called " The Jokers Wild" They state Postier asked Mr. Maus if he would ed in the report. Mr. Maus stated tha not agree to it. Alderman Solinger . Knutson. Patrolman Bode stated that nse and that he had been drinking, but appeared disturbed. Also tesifying Minnesota and was present and employed stion. Mr. Brani.ck stated that he shment, but only as a social group and 1 of for compensation. Having no more questions, the Council took this Agenda Item A-1 1 I RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL 2195 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Motion carried. Having no further business, Allen moved, Powers second to adjourn the meeting until 7:30 P.M. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. President Postier called the meeting to order at 7:30P.M., the following members being present: President Postier ,Aldermen Allen, Bluhm, Duffy , Powers, Solinger and Strain. Absent: None. A Hearing on the Appeal 84-2 - Appealing the decision of the Zoning. Board of Appeals which approved a variance to permit the re-establish ment of a duplex in the B-1 ( One Family Residential. Zoning District) Wishing to be heard was Ken Moen,. Attorney with the firm of Dunlap and Keith in Rochester and was appearing on behalf of Robert & Deborah Bendzick of 814 15th Street N. W. He urged the Council not to reverse the appeal approving the variance. Mr. Moen stated that the neighbors strongly oppose the granting of this variance and the -proposed variance is not in compliance with the authorized State statute nor does it comply wity any of the requirements in the City's zoning code. He stated that Dr.D.T. Sherden had this dwelling off the market for the past 12 years and is an R-1 district. Wishing to be heard was Bob. Bendzick of 814 15th Street N. W. He is opposed to the request to permit a duplex in the R-1 zone. Wishing to be heard was Deborah Bendzick of 814 15th Street N. W. and is opposed to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow this variance to be granted. Wishing to be heard was Phil Wellvang of 820 15th St. N.W. He is opposed to the establishing to another duplex in the area. He is not opposed to the two establishments that are presently in the neighborhood. But, no more. Wishing to be heard was John McCarter of 807 15th Street N. W. and is opposed. Pat Walsh of 815 15 112 St. N. W. is opposed. She stated that traffic is a problem and this will create more if the variance is allowed. Wishinc to be heard was Gail Peterson , Attorney representing D. T. Sherden and she stated that this has to'be owner occupied and this would insure any new owner from using the property as rental property only. She also stated that under Minnesota Statute No. 462.357 this variance is allowed. She stated that they have the approval of two neighbors. Wishing to be heard was Donald Meyers of 832 15th St. N. W. and is in favor of this variance. Gene Wente of Rochester, Mn. a close neighbor is in favor of this variance. Margaret Wente of 1426 9th Avenue N. W. is in favor of this variance. Wishing to be heard wz D.T. Sherden of 819 15th St. N. W. and stated that in'1972 when he bought this house, he needed the 5 bedrooms for his family. Now they are gone from home and he wanted to rent this part of the house that was originally rented again. He stated that the house is definitely set up as a duplex. It has two furnaces, two entrances, etc. Having no one else present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing. Bluhm moved, Duffy second to reverse the decisior of the Board of Appeals approving a variance permitting the re- establishment of a duplex in the B-1 ( One Family Residential ) Zoninc District. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. D.T. Sherden-. will not be allowed to use this dwelling as a duplex. Resolution No. 255-84 was adopted. I , 2196 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item Powers moved, Strain second to change the agenda and consider C-1 the prison issue at this time. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. C-1 A letter from Mayor Hazama regarding the veto of the resolution passed on April 30, regarding the Federal Prison, the following was received: Dear Council, It is with regret that I must invoke my Charter right to veto the resolution passed on the 30th day of April, 1984 to commence litigation on behalf of the City of Rochester to be filed against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and Olmsted County. I did so on the premise that I felt it was not realistic for us to be speculating with public funds in the amount of $250,000. on litgation that had little change of success. Sincerely, Chuck Hazama, Mayor, City of Rochester, Minnesota. This letter was dated May 4, 1984. He statedthat in addressingi:the Council earler this evening as an option,not knowing how they will vote, the Council as you know, on the advice of the Public Utility voted unanimously to close down the steam generating plant in two years. None of us really appreciated making that decision because of the 88 customers that are currently on our steam generating system. Tonight I would like to recommend that the City offer interest free loans to our customers who are now faced with the very difficult task of raising the necessary funds to provide energy to heat their facilities by the year 1986. These loans to be paid back within 10 years to assist any businesses and organizations what face the very difficult decision. The $250,000. that we had intended to spend on the cost of litigation in the next few years can be used to support the effort as we continue_ to develop and grow as a City. President Postier thanked the Mayor and responded to his comments as follows: President Postier stated that the Mayor had him taken back with the suggestion that the City work in loans on a Utility Department into this prison issue. President Postier was bothered by the quoting of figures that he used. Using $250,000. - President Postier recalled the approval of the Council of using $125,000. for expenditures in the year 1984. No more was approved to be allocated until the future years and approved by the Council. President Postier stated that along this line, the figures given by the Mayor and himself do differ. Also included in that $125,000, would have been the study to see if alternate uses could have been made for the property. But, if this money had been spent, it would have probably been no worse expenditure of funds than many things that have been spent over the years and approved by this Council. resident Postier asked other Council members if they would like to peak at this time. ark Charles Smith, candidate for Alderman At Large was in the audien nd wanted to be heard, because this was not a public hearing, and he Council did not grant him permission to speak, he was not allowed 1 address the Council. RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 2197 Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item C-1 Alderman Strain wished to be heard at this time. Alderman Strain stated that he thinks it is interesting to have an agenda here tonigh which has four items out of eight having to do with zoning. Four'.i items that this Council is responsible for. Being so very careful to make sure that we don't put a duplex in a resdiential one - single family area. Being so very careful to protect the City with our zoning and land use code. One of the major responsibilities that this Council has. I find this somewhat of a paradox. We have before us tonight,as we have had for many months,. a prison issue. This is an issue that thousands of residents, I am sure, wish that they had never heard anything about. The Olmsted County Board of Commissioners , I feel have done a grave disservice to this community by allowing this issue to ever be placed on their agenda for serious consideration. The merits of this issue , I know have been extensively debated. The net bottom line of this debate is dollars vs people and neighborhoods. I am serious about this issue. The prison proposal admittedly does create some jobs, it does fill severa empty.buildings that the County doesn't know what to do with, which they purchased for $1.00. But the cost in damages vastly exceed the benefits reaped by the County organization. And this action rips away at the very fiber of this community. It creates an extreme adverse land use in a single family land use area. A land use and a zoning code which we have been trying to protect here tonight on four minor zoning issues. Very carefully protected. We have spent a lot of time on this to make sure we are trying to do the right thing. It makes a mockery of local land use and zoning, which we expect all residents and all businesses to adhere.to. The very people that the County Board, who are expected to administer this and are responsible for, have totally ignored land use and zoning within our City limits. And, I would remind them that this ity is within Olmsted County limits. As a County elected body, and he owner of the property within the City limits, they had the respon- ibility : to utilize the property in a manner which would be ompatible and acceptable to the people of this City. Last summer, 983, when this City Council learned of what the County Board was hinking about doing, this Council went on record by unanimous resolut- dvising the County Board that we didn't think it was such a grand dea. Many times since then, individual Council members have gone to he County Board members, requested that they meet with us and talk his out before it gets .to'far. Quite recently, two of us Council embers went to our Senator Rudy Boschwich and others in Washington, uggested ways in which we could still work it out in ways that every- ody could come out winners. It seems that the Olmsted County Board ad a number of early and numerous messages regarding::the opposition: he City Council went on record, as I just suggested, the Citfzen eferendum, petitions, telephone calls, appearances that RSH Task orce No.3, which I personally represented as a Council representative e unanimously suggested to the County Board in last 1983,they they et the Merrill Lynch market the property for 12 months and come up with a user , what they suggested; could be a high tech user,would it in with Mayo and IBM, would become a job producer, would be a tax on 219 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item C-1 producer, would be all of these things, and all the County Board had to say was "yes , we will give you a chance as citizens to do this". They flatly rejected this. How does the County Board fit into this? Avoidance with meeting with City Council? Unresponsiveness to our suggestions? Their approach has been this - In December of 1982, e answered th&-question to this when we found thisiiout, why didn't the City purchase this property and do what we wanted to do with it? At the State of Minnesota in 1982 of December, special legislation as passed at the urging of the County Board that would effectively remove the City of Rochester from the opportunity to bid on this property or purchase it as was the law we should have had a chance. That legislation effectively cut us out of it. The sale of this roperty, quite recently, while I was out of the City, on a business rip, I couldn't believe what I heard about the sale of the property. very cold, clever, maneuvering behind the scenes on the timing and ales of this property to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. And, if if my figures are wrong, and if they are, I wish someone would correct e, On Tuesday, the lst day of May, at 10:00 central daylight time, he senate committee approved the appropriation and at 10: 05 A.M. check for $14,000,000. was presented to the Olmsted County Chairpersc t 10:15 A.M.,the County accepted this - And I believe that at 10:30 X. the Mayor vetoed the Council former.act-ion of Monday.This is cold, his is clever, this is calculating and it is manuevering and it is o cut the public out of any consideration. These bold tatics may be sed in other cities,I personally don't appreciate that these atics are used in Rochester. This community has been had by rofessionals who value a dollar over people and finally, there are any prison issues that are still unanswered and I believe that the citizens , and this Council should act in a positive responsive manner and allow this issue , which has not been resolved by the County Board, to go to court and let us have our day in court. Thank you. lderman Powers responded as follows: I hate to follow a dog and pony act, but I must say something. One of the things that is thrown at me & the land in question, -is n my ward. When I move out of the ward and see people from the therside of town, they say - Why are the people in your ward so opposed to this. And, I couldn't help but think tonight -I think he last time I saw this Chamber so filled was the night we were going to put Target at Apache Mall and we turned it down. The eople were very upset that lived around there and if we can get upset about a Target, I guess you have to expect them to get upset about a rison. I feel that the percentage in my ward runs about 70% opposed, maybe 80% I don't know, but it is high and I think one of the reasons that I would have liked to go to court would be to settle this. Let the court settle this.It appears that we are not going to get any help rom Commissioners, we'didn't get any help from our legislatures (State or Senators and this would be a way to handle this. I would like to s his go to court. I don't like to spend the money, but I feel that it could be money well spent. It would at least take this out of the political world and whatever the outcome we would have to accept it. e 1 ank.,you. 1 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item C-1 JAlderman Duffy responded: guess the duplicity of the County Board and the veto of the Council ction by our Mayor was a devastating blow and as far as I'm concerned uesday, May lst is going to be recorded as a day of infamy in the istory of the City of Rochester and Olmsted County. I have kind of ,ecapitulated some of the highlights of the things that have taken lace over the last couple of months. The Council and the County Boarl id meet in a joint session several weeks ago, at the time I accused ,he County Board of having made the decision to enter into negotiation., nd to accept the offer of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I was assure hat I was wrong that they were entertaining proposals, they had not ntered into negotiations. They had not made their minds up. At some oint in April, the record of decision was made by Mr. Carlson, the lirector of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. To my knowledge nothing in he way of a proposal was ever submitted at least the County Administri ffice is unable to provide me with any document that indicates a formi roposal was ever made. A letter of intent to purchase dated April 30 ive days after the check was written, however was submitted to the ounty. The transaction as you know took place with great swiftness ast Tuesday. To my knowledge, the contract governing that transactiol oes not exist. The County Administrator's office also was unable to upply me.with that. $14 million dollars transfer of the deed- no ontract. I understand that something is suppose to be put together, ut the transaction nevertheless, took place. That strikes.ime as., eing somewhat irresponsible in terms of the conduct:( -'of they --County overnment. We have been told by some of the more paternalistic embers of our community that we should let "Sleeping Dogs Lie", we hould get on with the business of healing wounds and governing the ity and the County. I guess I reject that, as far as I'm concerned, e've just begun to fight. And I think the first step should be a votE o override the Mayor's veto. lderman Solinger responded: r. Chairman, I would just like to-EOi-,terate what I said to the Counci ast week, as far as what has gone on in this community. I went early o investigate thoroughly what I thought should be done as the way we hould do things on the Council. To any issue that would come before s to investigate thoroughly. The Mayor and myself went as the Council n a trip to review these establishments in Butner N. Carolina and pringfield, Mo., and I felt it was something that any member of the ouncil should have taken an opportunity to do at the time. To horoughly investigate and see what the people of other communities hink about these institutions within their communities, and not just hat is in the institution. And I just reiterate what the results of hat I have seen and with the input that I get from my constituency, hat I feel that Rochester should be that it has been a caring communit nd that Rochester should accept this and in a gracious way. And that t can be safe and it can work with the community. As other institutio n this United States have been. Thank you. 0 for 1 Pr 2200 RECORD -OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item C-1 3resident Postier was asked what the date on the check was. It was ated April 25th, 7 days before it was given. That was from the ost-Bulletin. Maybe the government can operate that way, didn't have oney on hand to write a 14 million dollar check without funds. I don think the City could do that nor could I do that in business. One oint before asking for a motion, I have been told on this hand the mount of money were going to spend, I have been told that by some ver; ew on the Council that doesn't oppose the prison, they are in favor o, 't that this $125,000 is a lot of money. Memories must be short, be- ause it was only within the last couple of months that we have 1 house itting S.E. Rochester that is near the floodway. We didn't seem to at an eye to spend $90,000 for that and we are talking about spending 150,000 here. resident Postier responded with his comments: see my duty as an elected official of the City of Rochester, it is t epresent the majority wishes of the voting public. Some members of ;his body may disagree with my assumptions as to what the majority wan ►ut when I look back at the petitions, referendums and the polls all ndependently given without our help, there is no other stand that I :an take, but to oppose the prison. And why do I say that, I go back ;o Sept. 1983, when a petition was circulated amoungst the County •esidents, as I understand, with over 7,000 signatures opposing the )rison in the present location. On October 1983, a referendum under ;he most adverse conditions that anyone could even possibly think.of ind probably the second largest turn -out, it was the second largest we )ave ever had in the history of Rochester at an off year election. '8% of those people opposed, 22% in favor of the prison. March, 1984, ,he Post -Bulletin, God bless them, took a poll, I- don" t- know i.f they_-, expected those results, but the results came out thus 52% opposed to the prison, 32% in favor. On April 1984, Republican Representative ail Gutknecht had a poll including the prison question. 66% opposed. 11% in favor. On April 1984, the Home Show had a poll that was done (n one of our voting machines, the results 61% opposed 39% in favor. I 6uld want to bring attention to the Council and to the people here, nd I say if this vote in overriding the Mayor's veto should fail, it i of a victory for the minority in defeating the majority of the Council ut a defeat for the majority of the voting public in Rochester. I ould beg of you to override this veto the first one to be issued by hi onor, and he has that right, but what a time to issue his first veto. assure you of my hope for a continued effort on the part of the City o oppose this Federal takeover of property within the City limits and o proceed as far as legally possible keeping in mind the actions taken the Mayor and certain Council members. I also would wish success to he Citizens who would carry on this litigation, as an individual tax- ayer. I hope we can this veto overriden. 1 Agenda Item C-1 [1 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF- THE COMMON COUNCIL - CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Having no further comments at this time, Strain moved, Duffy second,--; to override the Mayor's veto and proceed with the litigation. Upon Roll Call vote, Aldermen Duffy, Powers, Strain and President Postier voted aye. Ayes (4). Aldermen Allen, Bluhm and Solinger voted nay. Nays (3). Motion does not carry as 5/7 vote is needed to override a veto. As you see President Postier addressed the public: As you see ladies and gentlemen, we have had a change on the Council's feeling by one member and he will now address you. We were not able t override the veto. lderman Bluhm responded as .follows: honorable Mayor Hazama, Council President Postier and fellow Council- nen. I am indeed humble as I appear before you tonight to identify the stand that I have taken. The first item on the agenda on this the 7th day of May, 1984, will unquestionably go down in history as the host controversial issue that this Council or any past or future Counc could or would have ever considered. The present anti -social impact of this issue is very much in evidence in this community. Citizens in all walks of life have taken the initiative to attach themselves to a specific stand on the issue and have defended that issue as never be- fore. As a result, we find friends not talking to friends, we find neighbors against neighbors, just people against people and in additioi businesses being boycotted over it. One week ago today I placed mysel- in the uncomfortable position of deciding the course of action we will take today. I have indeed spent the entire week preceding this meetin( to evaluate as best I could the merits of each side of this issue. I have determined that both sides of the issue have very convincing . arguments in favor of their position, however, I would wholeheartedly agree that the anti -prison group has by far convinced me once again of unquestionable dedication to a cause. In addition, to all their concerns which we are aware of as the uncontrollable fear.of the un- known. the question of their life and safety. This uncontrollable fear has resulted in instilling a tremendous emotional effect on the lives of those living adjacent to the site. Today, based on the information presented to me over this past week and based on my interpretation of our attorney's arguments and advice I reached the decision to vote in favor of sustaining the.Mayor's veto. I- am not in any way proud that I have taken this unpopular choice. On reaching this decision, I once again read the letters of my very close friends who pleaded with me to override the Mayor's veto: These letters once again reminded me of thi speed, the haste and the discreet way in which this issue was handled since its inception. A not too perfect example of a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The fact of the matter in ny opinion, is that the psychological impact resulting from the matter in which this issue was handled is certainly beyond anyones imagination 2201 ���� RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item C-1 This factor alone could prove to be more destructive to the hearts and minds of those who fought against the prison, than the issue it- self. I do not know if I have made the right decision, I can only hope and pray that the unknowns will not come back and haunt us. Therefore, I will not stand idle. I have several concerns I will pur- sue, the first be relative to the financial assistance to the property owners who experience property value losses in the method in which we will guarantee and relate to a fair market value. The following will relate to solid waste recovery site. To request that our Public Work Dept. begin to identify routes in which refuse vehicles will be allowed to travel throughout the City in route to the refuse site. To consider whatever action it takes to require refuse vehicles out- side of our community to use the most extreme outer approach to the refuse site. Due to and because of the use of the property as a refuE collectors site, I would support whatever action it takes to exp•edi.te the construction of East Circle Drive, from Highway 14 to Highway 63. In closing, I would like to make this statement. Outside of a few jobs to be gained, there are still a lot of doubts in my own mind relative to the economic impact versus the impact of dissension among our people, within this City. Did we win or did we lose. This will be determined at a later date. The real winner in this issue was the County Board. As a result I as a City official recognize the tremen- dous effort it will require to restore unity within our community and in addition the tremendous effort it will require to regain support for future issues that affect our environment. Therefore, I challenge Mayor Hazama to a task far greater than he has ever performed in his 5 years as Mayor. That is to perform the miracle that in the past, only God has accomplished. Your challenge Mr. Mayor, would be to not overlook the impact of this issue has on 7,000 plus people. In additi my challenge will suggest that you along with those who identify them- selves as caring and loving persons use every method at their disposal to heal the wounds of those afflicted by identifying with them. There concerns and extend to them your undivided attention to deal with thes concerns. Thank you. A ten minute recess was taken at this time. eeting was called to order. Duffy moved, Powers second.,,.. to forward all information gathered by attorney's for the Prison litigation to the OCBC. The City Administra to take care of notification. Upon roll call vote, Aldermen Allen,. Bluhm, Duffy, Powers, Strain and President Postier voted aye. Ayes (6) Alderman Solinger voted nay. Nays (1). Motion carried. e r 1 Agenda Item am Im RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May T, 1984 A hearing on the Petition to Change the Zoning District from R-1 to B-4 on Lots 6 and 7, Block 11 of the West'Zumbro - the Northerly Parking Area of the former Jim's Ranch Market on 2nd St. S. W. Wishir to be heard was Forest Sergeant of 2509 4th Avenue N. W. He would like to use this as a nursery and garden center. He will landscape this and use the building and grounds as a show place. He stated that he intended to close the exit/entrance of 2nd St. and use the one on 18th. Alderman Duffy wanted to know the intention of use for the winter months. Mr. Sergeant stated that it would be used for Christmas trees, etc. and would be open for indoor plants. Wishing to be heard was Mark Gunnerson of 1811 1st St. S. W. He was worried about more stop signs or yield signs on 18th. Mr. Roger Plumb, Public Services Director will look into this problem. Wishing to be heard was Harold Gunnerson of 1811 1st St. S.W. and is in favor of this project. Having no one else present that wished to be heard, Presides Postier closed the hearing. Allen moved, Strain second, to instruct the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance making the change. Ayes (7 Nays (0). Motion carried. A Hearing on the Rezoning of lands from (R-1) Residential to (R-2) General Commercial, (M-1) Light Industrial and (M-2) General Ind- ustrial in the vicinity of 40th Street South and Truck Highway 63. Wishing to be heard was Tom Green, Vice President of Mills Fleet Farm Rochester. Wanted to know what the Land Use was for them. Larry Klemmenhagen of the Planning Department told him it was and still is Industrial. Wishing to be heard was Karl Shuller and thinks the area of French's Produce should be zoned M-1. Having no one else present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing Duffy moved, Strain second, to approve the zoning and include the French's Produce area as being zoned M-1. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motior carried. A Hearing on the Application for a Planned Unit Development (Concept Statement) to be known as Marfield Manor. Having no one present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing. Strain moved, Solinger second, to approve the PUD: Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. (This is just the concept statement). A Hearing on the Petition to vacate a portion of the 30' wide unimpro ROW for 13th Avenue S. W., in the Plat of Collegeview. Having no one present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing Strain moved, Duffy second, to adopt Resolution No. 256-84 approving the vacation with.a utility easement being retained for the full width of the ROW as requested by the various utility departments. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. n 2203 2204 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 Agenda Item M. V. B-7 E-26 E-1 A Hearing on the Petition to vacate a 7 foot wide Utility Easement along the East Side of Lot 7, Block 1 Leitzens Fourth Addition. Having no one present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing. Strain moved, Powers second, to adopt Resolution No. 257-84 approving the vacation. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. A Hearing on the Petition to vacate the East- West Alley platted between Outlot No. 1 and Block 4 of Flather's Addition. Having no one present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing. Bluhm moved, Solinger second to adopt Resolution No. 258-84 approving the vacation. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. A Hearing on the Final Plat, Manor Woods West, First Subdivision. Wishing to be heard was Don Behler of Land Surveyors for the develope He asked that Item E-26 be acted on along with this hearing. He was told that it would. Having no one else present that wished to be heard, President Postier closed the hearing. Allen moved, Solinger second to adopt Resolution No. 259-84 approving the plat subject to the following: 1. The developer will provide an agreement guaranteeing that he will pay the drainage improvement costs which ma; later be intended to be assessed against this platted area. 2. The developer pick up a portion of the assessable costs which would other wise be assessed against the Park Department property; and 3. The improvements would be undertaken as a assessment project over a two year period. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. Allen moved, Solinger second to remove this item from'the table. Aye! (7), Nay (0). Motion carried. Allen moved, Solinger second to order a hearing on Project No. 8406-1-84 J 8860 for Construction of Streets Concrete Curb and Gutter, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain and Service Connections in Manor Woods West First Sub. The hearing will be held on June 4, 1984. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried and Resolution No. 244-84 was adopted. Allen moved, Solinger second to remove the Request for a 3.2 Beer license for Eastside Inn from the table. Solinger moved, Bluhm second to renew the license and have the owner appear before the Committee of the Whole. After discussion by the Council, with the owner present, Bluhm removed his second and Solinger removed the motion. Powers moved, Allen second to approve the operation under the present license and meet with the owner at the Committee of the Whole meeting next Monday. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. F-1 An Ordinance Rezoning certain property to B-4 General Business in Lot 6 and 7, Block 11, West Zumbro Addition - (Jim's Ranch Market on 2nd St. S. W.) was given its first reading. RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 May 7, 1984 Agenda CIGAAETTES Item BIIOTTI'S `TA�iAN Vttl``AGEE N 304 lST AVE SW ALT NAME- 0, C STALE MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 12ll 7TH ST NM PHONE- M-PHONE- 282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0245 E _ 8 CONNOIAjLDOA1MINTOON. RRT pAR APHONE- E 424 SM L2Ll3RD 7THAVE ST NM M-PHONE- -282-6080 LIC CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0247 EETSYPE- OENNYALTRNAME RANG L226 SOUTH BROADWAY R STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NY PHONE- M-PHONE- 282-6080 LiC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0249 GALAX f,NgjEL- 11 17TH AVE SW 0 6 R STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NM � PHONE- N-PHONE- 282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE L[C NUM- 0251 GULLIX6;IAAME- 0 R 1915 HIGHWAY 52 NORTH 6 STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LICSS TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0253 HILLCAITTNAMEGED 6 R STAR IS03 HIGHWAY 52 NORTH MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PHONE- N-PHONE- -282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0256 HiLLCAE TNAAEAR6 1760 EAST FRONTAGE AC R STAR MAILING- D G R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LiC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LiC NUM- 0246 HOFFMAN HOUSE 1517 l6TH ST SW ALT NAM - D 6 R STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR L211 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LiC TYPE- CIGARETTES HUEY'S CNG!R STORRB2-6394 - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0238 330 SOUTH BROADWAY PLMIOCyy E[TYPppE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0235 I F CAAYIAAMEN ROCHESTER AIRPORT D E R STAR MAjL NG- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PH N - M-PHONE- -282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0248 FOOD JIM'SAOITINAMEL CO HIGHWAY l4 6 16TH AVE NW 0 R6S?JXIERAGE MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NM PHONE- M-PHONE- 282-6080 LICTYPE-TYPEE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0244 LEBISALT NAME- D 6 R STAR 4L6 SOUTH BROAOWA) MAILING- 0 6 R STAR l2ll 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0243 MICHAEL'S RESTAURANT IS SOUTH BROADWAY PHON 288-2020 LIC PE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0234 MISTER DONUT L828 HIGHWAY 52 NORTH ALT NAME- D C R STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR L2L1 7TH Si NW PHONF M-PHONE - 282-6080 LIC PE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0250 NORTMALTAR BARME-0 503 NORTH BROADWAY 6 R STAR MAILING- D 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0252 REGAL CAFE 1239 2ND ST SW ALIT NAME- 0 6 R STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LiC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0236 SINCLALT NTMT1ON 1703 14TH ST NW 6 R STAR MAILING- D 6 R STAR L211 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LiE TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0255 SINCLAIR STATION 205 6TH ST SW 6 R STAR MAILING- 0 6 R STAR 12ll 7TH ST NW PHONE- M-PHONE- -282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0257 SKYWAYS OF ROCHESTER ROCHESTER AIRPORT ALT NAME- D 6 R STAR MAILING- D 6 R STAR 1211 7TH ST NW PALLING- M-PHONE- 282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0237 E-8 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 SIL OIALTSNANEL00 6TNLSTAR 519 4TH AVE SW MAILING- 0 t R STAR 1211 TTH ST NY PHONE• M-PHONE• 282-6080 LIC TYPE• CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0239 TINKLER'S RjTAURANT It 2N0 Si SW ALi NA t• 0 6 R STAR MA`LING- 0 6 R STAR 1211 TTH ST NW PHONE• M-PHONE- 282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES -'VEND[ NG MACHINE LIC NUM- 0241 2UMBRD T LL 105 1ST AVE SW ALT NiRE- 0 f R STAR MAILING- 0 L R STAR _ 1211 TTH ST NW PHONE- *-PHONE- 282-6080 LIC TYPE- CIGARETTES - VENDING MACHINE LIC NUM- 0242 22 LICENSES _ AUCTIONEERS i d � 5 07 841.i Em¢rty Henn _ OS 07 94 12 31 84 Zumbac FaU_4 SIOEWALKS.- CEMENT I - - 303 Fi6th Avenue S.E. 5 07 84I K.l.ndeeth b Mahoney ConatAuction 05 07 84 12 31 8_4I _1025 _ St¢wantvitte_ 559_76_ _ i 508 Finnway Count NoAth - 5 07 ' 84I Mirc eC Lawson 05 07 84 -_ 12 _ 31_84 0026 Stewantvcf2e 55976_ 5 07 84 Dona.Cd F. Ryan, Ryan Concne.te_ 05 07 84 12 31 841 -027 2315 Manion Road S.E. 5 07 84I Metro Development Conpou-tti.on _105_ 07 84 12 31 84I 0023_. I _1832 HihLtuq 52 NoAth 1 Agenda Item F-1 1 RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL ��� CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting No. 35 - May 7, 1984 An Ordinance Rezoning property to R-2 Low Density Residential in Willow Ridge Sub. and B-4 General Business and M-1 Light Industrial (Willow Creek Area) was given its first reading. Having no further businesss, Allen moved, Solinger second to adjourn the meeting until 11:00 A.M. on May 16, 1984. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried. er Information - 5-7-84 1. Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes - April 23, 1984. 2. Letter from Kevin Malloy Re: Mayor's Veto of Lawsuit against the Federal Bureau of Prisons.