HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-21-1990RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
N? 3530 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 35-30
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21; 1990
Agenda
Item
A-1 President Selby called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M., the follow-
ing members being present: President Selby, Aldermen Bluhm, Canfield,
Hunziker, McConnell, Solinger and Strain. Absent: None.
Aldermen McConnell moved, Bluhm seconded, to approve the minutes of
the May 7, 1990 meeting. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
B-1 A Hearing on the County HRA operation within the City and on County
HRA Redevelopment Plan for Riverbend Area. President Selby asked
that Dan O'Neal from Public Financial Systems give a short presenta-
tion.
Dan O'Neal, Public Financial Systems, Public Financial Advisory to
Olmsted County. The Redevelopment Plan itself outlines the area in
which the County anticipates construction of the project; a
statutory requirement. The other item is a resolution which requests
that the Council approve the Redevelopment Plan and authorizes the
County's Redevelopment Authority to act within the City in regard to
this project only. Mr. O'Neal noted that funding will be available
to the County HRA on June 30, 1990 in the amount of $18,500,000. The
total amount of borrowing is not anticipated to exceed $20,000,000;
the project will be financed through the sale of revenue bonds by the
HRA.
Wishing to be heard was James Daley, Rural Olmsted County, -Kalmar_ -
Township. Mr. Daley noted that he felt that the citizens of the
County and the Council as a whole are lacking a lot of information
of how the project might work and who is responsible. He stated that
he is fearful that .the County is getting themselves into a corner
with indebtednEss.He noted that the project has been started because
of the need for a jail facility. The County, he believes, is meeting
their space needs quite well and are finally finishing and utilizing
the third floor of the present Courthouse; space that was added a
few years ago. Mr. Daley noted that originally the project was going
to be a joint effort between the County and the City but the City
has not been ready and so by the Council's silence, the County has
gone ahead and committed themselves to awful expenditures.
Mr. Daley noted that the financing that the County will be using will
be removed from legislation as of July 1, 1990. The citizens haven't
had or been able to have a say in the actions by referendum. Mr.
Daley had with him a survey taken last fall. Alderman McConnell was
present when it was attested to. The survey showed:
-890 people responded to the survey in the Rochester Post -Bulletin.
last fall as to the Riverbend site for a new government center.
-90 percent of the voters said that they wanted a referendum
-73 percent were City people; 27 percent were county residents
-73 percent said that they would like to see the Courthouse remain
at its present location; 12 percent said that they would like to
see it moved to the campus; 9 percent said that they would like to
see the Riverbend site; 6 percent were undecided.
The Township Officers Association presented the survey to the County
Board last fall and it was ruled by the County Board to be
unscientific.
Agenda
Item
B-1-
(cont)
1
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 3531
Adiourned-Meeting.No. 32 - May 21. 1990
Mr. Daley noted that, according to
lease space will go from $7,00.per
$13.00 per square foot.
the architect for the new project,
square.foot to between $12.00 and
Mr. Daley concluded by telling the Council that if they said "yes"
to the project, the revenues are going to fall short and the people
of the County are going to be responsible for the shortfall.
Having no one further wishing to speak, President Selby closed the
hearing.
Dan Berndt, 505 Marquette Bank -Building, gave a short -presentation.
Mr. Berndt chaired the task force through the Chamber of Commerce
that reviewed the government center with the County and spent a lot
of hours on alternatives. Three studies were -done and outside
consultants were hired on all of them. Study No. #1 asked if the
existing Courthouse facility could be expanded to meet the short and
long-term needs of the jail faci.lity and the needs of the County.
Study No. #2 was a study of the Riverbend site, and Study No. #3 was
.a study of the campus site. After the studies were in, the costs of
remodeling the present facility, jail costs and asbestos concerns,
the Courthouse became by far the most expensive option of the three
proposals. One reason for the Courthouse being expensive was because
the $25,000,000 from the Clinic was not there to work with. Mr.
Berndt noted that.he believed the County acted responsibly and made
an appropriate decision.
.Dan O'Neal was asked to speak again. As the project is currently
proposed, it is to be done without any kind of tax levy and is to be
paid for with revenues from the sale of the old facility and other
monies the County has available. There is currently less than
$1,000,000 outstanding against the County's capacity to fund. This
amount is very low compared to other counties in the State. There is
also not a provision for referendum vote by law under this type of
funding/bonding and,. ..therefore, would have no binding effect on a
project of this type.
Bob,Bendzick, Financial Director for Olmsted County, spoke. Mr.
Bendzick noted that at this point it is projected that over half of
the facility will be taken care of by sale proceeds from the old
Courthouse facility. He stated that there are currently jail bonds
in place since 1935 that will take care of the jail portion. There
is currently about $230,000 in maintenance appropriated for the
Courthouse that can be used each year. In addition, a future growth
projection will allow space to be leased to other governmental units
in the building.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Bluhm seconded, to adopt Resolution #249-90
declaring the need for the Olmsted County Housing and Redevelopment
Authority to exercise its powers in the City and approving the Re-
development Project and the Redevelopment Plan for the Riverbend site
Ayes (6), Nays (0), Abstain (1). Alderman McConnell abstained.
Motion carried.
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
NO. 3532 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N9 3532
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
B-2 IA Hearing on the Concept Planned Unit Development #90-2, a 160-acre
Development Called Essex Estates.
Wishing to be heard was Frank Kottschade, North American.Realty,
2613 Fifth Avenue N.W. Mr. Kottschade noted that this is the largest
planned unit development submitted to the Planning Department in the
City of Rochester. The 120 acres was at one time proposed to be a
golf course but the City decided to locate the course in another areE
Therefore, he noted .that he has the largest tract of land in the Cit)
that is in close proximity to downtown and on major arterial streets.
He introduced Mr. John Uban, architect/planner for the project.
Wishing to be heard was John Uban, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban,
Incorporated, 300 First Avenue North, Minneapolis. Mr. Uban presente
an overview of the project outlining the single family development,
multi -family development and the linking and usage of the existing
and future park complex.
Wishing to be heard was Mark Schroeder, 4025 Tenth Avenue N.W. Mr.
Schroeder voiced his concern that the present homeowners adjacent to
the project-have�been ignored. He noted that he has no objection to
the single-family dwellings planned but the multi -family housing will
just create more apartment complexes along 41st Street. He asked
that the multi -family housing be moved to another location in the
project.
Wishing to be heard was.David Edwardy, 4017 llth Avenue N.W. Mr.
Edwardy noted that he would be living directly across from the multi-
family housing. He.also noted that at the first Planning Commission
meeting the Planning Commission denied that particular location for
the multi -family housing because it would change the character of
the neighborhood.
Wishing to be heard was Dwight Denisen, 4120 14th Avenue N.W., noting
his objection to the location of the multi -family housing complex.
Wishing to be heard was Pat Hays, 4019 Tenth Avenue N.W. Ms. Hays
noted that it is a neighborhood concern and would like to have the
neighborhood have a voice in the development. She also noted her
objection to the location of the multi -family housing units.
Wishing to be heard was Gary Sobotta, 942 41st Street N.W. Mr.
Sobotta noted that there are different types of persons in apartment;
One example is the high speed of traffic and the displaying of high
speed, the high amount of litter, the amount of theft, and people
driving through his yard. He is not opposed to the current apartment
or people living in apartments but is opposed to having another set
of apartments directly across the street from his home. He believes
that.it will adversely affect his home value and is opposed to the
amount of traffic that will be generated. He would like to have
the church and multi -family units moved to another location on the
property.
Agenda
Item
B-2
(cont:)
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 3533
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Wishing to be heard was James Hines, 4031 Tenth Avenue N.W. Mr.
Hines stated that he previously lived at 16th Avenue N.W. At that .
time Candlewood was being developed and the neighborhood came as a
group expressing some of the same concerns to the Council that are
. now being expressed.. A tremendous amount of noise is generated withi
the units in multi -family housing. There are a lot of people coming
and going through the day and night, a lot of articles left on yards
from people in those, units. He asked that the Council give considerz
tion to the homeowners around the property in question.
Having no one further wishing to speak, President Selby closed the
hearing.
Alderman Solinger felt that it is a unique idea for having 20 acres
additional for park to add to the existing.40 acres of City parkland,
This idea also makes the development more attractive to the potentia:
buyer. The only reservation, he noted, was the density of the
rental units on the 15.3 acres of property; if at all feasible, he
would like the density cut down.
Alderman Bluhm agreed with Alderman Solinger and hoped that things
could be worked out with the residents and developer. This item
will be coming before the Council again; it is still in the pre-
liminary stages.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Bluhm seconded, to approve the concept
plan for Essex Estates with five conditions:
(1) The owners petition to annex all the land subject to this
concept plan, that being the additional land in the northeast
corner.
(2) The owners begin the process of environmental review for this
project as required under Minnesota Rules.
(3) Special ..consideration shouldbe given to the design features
and building location for the multi -family project to buffer
its visual effects to the homes across 41st Street and the
homes over to the west. Orienting the ends of the buildings
to 41st Street could help reduce the visual impact to the
homes across the street. Extensive use of berming, landscapin4
and building setback can also be an aid to integrating the
project.
(4) The western driveway into the apartment area should line up
across from llth Avenue.N.W., ,
(5) 48th Street N.W. through the project ,:should have, the same
right-of-way.width (801) and street width as it does in the
subdivisions to the west. All other public streets in the
plan should have right-of-way widths as found in the
Thoroughfare Plan.
Discussion. Alderman McConnell expressed that he hoped that before
the plan moved to the second stage that the developer meet with the
neighborhood residents.
Ayes . (7) , Nays (0) . Motion caxried
RECORD -OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON
-N? 3534 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
B-3
B-4
COUNCIL
N° 3534
A Dearing on Text Amendment to amend the text to include provisions
establishing an "Agricultural"Zoning District within the City.
Wishing to be heard was JoAnn Russell, Z 900 llth Street S.W. She
was concerned because their property is in the flight path of the
airport and comes under the airport zoning regulations which allows
for only a minimum lot size of 5 acres. She noted that they have
planted trees and improved a site for future. selling purposes and
now will probably not be able to because of the airport zoning
regulation and the proposed agricultural zoning district.
Alderman Bluhm stated that he felt that those persons who were
annexed would be given a grandfather clause under the zoning change.
Having no one further wishing to speak, President Selby closed the
hearing.
Alderman Strain asked what .the airport zoning does to the Russell
land.
Terry -Spaeth from the Planning Department explained that the zoning
for the airport requires a minimum lot size of five acres. There-
fore, nothing is lost or gained.
Having no objection from the Council, Ralph Russell, 5900 llth
Street S.W., was allowed to speak. He stated that there is somethi
taken away in that if the new zoning district is approved, no
animals will be allowed on the acreage that he wishes to divide.
Terry Spaeth noted that if they want to do something in the future,
they could:apply for a PUD and note the circumstances surrounding
the acreage or they could create a one -lot subdivision.
Aldermen Hunziker moved, Strain seconded, to proceed as petitioned
and instruct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending
the zoning ordinance text for adoption. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion ce
A Hearing on Land.Us_e Amendment On Property Along Viola Road and
East Circle Drive,
Wishing to.be.heard-was..Don.:Borcherding, yaggy-Colby Associates,
2129 Northview Lane..:N..E. - Mr.=:Borcherding reviewed the -background
,of the development.. He noted that they are -trying to plan out ahead,
of'development-quite-a ways in the future and from an existing
standpoint.- -The Planning Commission requested that the commercial
usage of --the area be. cut back from-23 to 13..acre-s. The medium
density residential use was cut from 21 t-o- 13 acres 'as well. -
Alderman Bluhm stated that -there was a suggestion by the neighbors
to move the park easterly 200 feet.
Don Borcherding noted that the Park Department has purchased that
tract of land already so it would require a land swap. Those
factors would have to be analyzed as to feasibility and costs.
rried.
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 3535
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item Alderman Bluhm stated that the concern that he had received from the
B-4 neighborhood was to make sure that access to the park is granted,
(cont.)
particularly those in the Northern Heights East addition.
Wishing to speak was Susan Rotsch, 1803 Northern Heights Lane N.E.,
expressing concern for -getting to the park by either a heavily -
traveled road or cutting through backyards. She stated that there
should be a trail going through the neighborhood to the park; the
only other alternative to them is a park by Churchill and that is
over one mile away.
Alderman Bluhm stated that he understood that there was adequate
space behind.the homes in the road right-of-way by Vio27,a Road for'
a trail.
Wishing to speak was Steve Mullen, 2036 Northview Lane N.E.. Mr.
Mullen represents the residents of the Northview Lane N.E. area
and surrounding areas. They have been working with the developer,
Roger Payne, on this project to formulate a land use amendment to
continue the land use and integrity of the neighborhood. Mr. Payne
had meet with the group. Mr. Mullen gave a handout to the
Council on what the group had been doing and what their.concerns
were. Those concerns were:
(1) Continue active solicitation of churches, community swim club
members and townhome developers.
(2) They submitted an addendum to the newly proposed land use
that requests the park department move the neighborhood park
eastward and the vacated land area be proposed as R-1 upon
zoning.
(3).They are in opposition to the proposed medium density
residential land use adjacent to East Circle Drive. They
would favor a low density residential use for this area.
Roy Sutherland, Park Superintendent, noted that this is the first
time he has seen the request to move the park and will be glad to
sit down with the residents and developer .and bring something back
specific to the Council.
Wishing to be heard was Bob Jones, 1808 Northern Heights.Lane N.E.,
expressing his.concern regarding the medium density area; he would
rather see it zoned R-2.
Wishing to be heard was Carolyn Orszulak, 2121 Northview Lane N.E.
Ms. Orszulak spoke against the medium density area. She doesn't
think that it would be of benefit to the neighborhood or the swim
club and they are trying to develop. Additional and excessive
traffic and noise would be created.
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
'N° 3536 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N9 35-36
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
B-4
(cont. )
Wishing to speak was Larry Kestila, 1740 Northern Valley Drive N.E.
Mr. Kestila noted that he is the block representative for his
street which consists of about 17 families. He commended Mr. Payne
for his working with the neighborhoods and planning ahead as such.
He is, however, opposed to the R-3 zoning, would like to see it R-2,
and likes the idea of the swim club. He believes that the integrity
of the neighborhood should be maintained.
Wishing to be heard was Jill Grunewald, 1833 Northern Valley Drive
N.E. She is also concerned about and opposed to the medium density
proposal and would like to see the park moved. She was one of the
persons who went around with a petition and about 99 percent of
thel people were opposed as well.
Having no one further wishing to speak, President Selby closed the
hearing.
Alderman Bluhm noted that the objection of the medium density zoning
by the residents seems to be the major obstacle. However, in talkin
with Mr. Payne he notes that Mr. Payne doesn't even own the property
in question. The property is,tied up in an estate at this time.
Mr. Bluhm noted that it was his understanding that the Planning De-
partment wanted a general plan of the entire area to the north and
so Mr. Payne was obligated to go into this area on paper and draw ou
the plan.
Jeff Ellerbush, Planning Department, noted that George Kerr for
the estate has been representing the property interest.
Alderman Solinger questioned whether there is limited access onto
East Circle Drive controlled by the County.
Jeff Ellerbush, Planning Department, stated that the County had
purchased the right-of-way access and controls access onto the road.
Aldermen Hunziker moved, Strain seconded, to adopt Resolution
#250-90 approving the land use amendment from low residential to
medium density residential and commercial on property along Viola
Road and Circle Drive.
Alderman Bluhn asked Roger Payne what his impression of consideratic
of land use was for the medium density -area as designated on the pl,
It was Mr. Bluhm's understanding that Mr. Payne did not have any
control over the north end of the area and now finds that he is in
concert with an owner developing the land use plan.
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 3537
Adjourned Meeting -No. 32 - May 21, 1990
.Agenda
Item
Roger Payne, 1700 Northwood Drive N.E., stated that the reason they
B-4
are in concert with the land owner is because they are representing
(cont,
the portion that they own and the other owner is representing the
-'future,
portion that he owns. Possibly in the Mr. Payne stated,
they may own the land but do not at this time and did not put the
medium density designation on it. He further stated that he did no
know ,if 'this was the -best use for the property.as it probably won't
be developed for five to -ten years and what.might happen then is
unknown.
It was the concern of the Council that if they approved the plan as
it stood the medium density designation would continue to stand and
become difficult to change in the future. Mr. Canfield noted that
if it was designated R-3 it could go through a-PUD and the concern
of the neighborhood would be covered because it would have to come
back before the Council at that time.
Alderman Hunziker withdrew his motion: Alderman Strain withdrew
his second.
Aldermen Strain moved, Bluhm seconded, to approve on this revision
on the commercial frow 23.07 to 13.27 acres. Ayes (7), Nays (0).
Motion carried. Resolution 250-90 was adopted.
Alderman Bluhm commended the neighborhood for the efforts they put
into the land use plan and commend Roger Payne for his concerns
of the neighborhood and cooperation that he has given.
G-1
Aldermen Strain moved, McConnell seconded, to remove from the table
the General Development Plan for the area known as':Northern fleight,s
East. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Bluhm moved, Strain seconded, to adopt Resolution #249-90A
approving the General Development Plan for Northern Heights East
with the following two conditions:
(1) The north -south road in the project from Viola Road to Circle
Drive should be designated as a "major local street" when it
comes to plat this property.
(2) The access opening from Circle Drive shown in the area
identified for "medium density residential use" as the north-
east portion of the plan is not needed in the proposed street
layout. This existing access opening should be permanently
closed at the time this portion of the site develops.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
B-5
A Hearing on Amendments to Chapter 61 of the Rochester Zoning Code
to Add Provisions Clarifying Responsibilities for Complaince.
Aldermen Hunziker moved, Bluhm seconded, to continue the hearing to
June 18, 1990 to allow the Planning Commission to review the complete
revisions. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
I
'N°." 3538
Agenda
Item
C-1
C-2
D-1
E-1
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 3538
Adiourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990 .
A Hearing on Re -Appropriation of CDBG Downtown Commercial Rehab Fun
to Slum and Blight.- Demolition Activity.
Having no one wishing to be heard, President Selby closed the hearin
Aldermen Canfield moved, Strain seconded, to amend.the 1988 Final
Statement to re -appropriate $70,000 from the Downtown Commercial
Rehab Account to the Slum and Blight - Demolition Activity Account.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Strain moved, Canfield seconded, to appoint Cynthia Daube
to the Downtown Development Advisory Board. Ms. Daube will fill the
unexpired term of Claude Glatzmaier who resigned. The unexpired tern
will run to December 31, 1990. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Bluhm moved, Hunziker seconded, to appoint Donna.Bailey on
the Human Rights Commission, replacing Victoria Faucette. The three
year term run to May 1, 1993. And to reappoint Daniel G. Holter and
Dr. Anthony Sinkiewicz to three-year terms ending May 1, 1993.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen McConnell moved, Canfield seconded, to approve the requestec
sanitary sewer connection for Lot 22, Block 1., Riverview Subdivision
subject to payment of connection charges and receipt of a signed
agreement relating to the annexation of the property. Ayes (7),
Nays (0). Motion carried.
Having no one from the Council objecting, Cheri Wheeler, 2228 13th
Avenue N.W., spoke to the issue of banning of cigarette vending
machines in the City of Rochester. Ms. Wheeler shared with the Counc:
the 1344 names on petitions to ban cigarette vending machines. She
asked if Council members had an opportunity to read the two -point
model that was handed to members a few days ago and if there were any
questions on it. She noted that there are now 18 cities in the State
of Minnesota with total bans on cigarette vending machines; 21 cities
that have partial restrictions that are much more strict than the
new state law passed. She asked if Council members had seen the
gallup poll in the Rochester Post -Bulletin a few days previously.
Ms. Wheeler explained that she was speaking representing the task
force as co-chair and asking the Council to consider the total ban
of cigarette vending machines.
Having no objection from Council members, Dan Berndt, 505 Marquette
Bark Building, spoke to the issue of regulation of cigarettes. He
noted that the issue facing the Council is how to prevent minors from
obtaining tobacco, what has been done, what works and to keep focus
on that as a goal. The legislature passed a law at the last session
which says that we think there is an alternative to cigarette vending
machines which is to allow a controlled situation. We believe that
the best solution to keeping juveniles from smoking is through educat
and sanctions. D & R Star has met with the Police Chief to discuss
_1
on
1
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA NO
Adiourned-MeetinR No. 32 - May 21. 1990
Agenda
Item setting up an educational program which D A R Star would participate
in the cost of. What you have before you tonight is an issue which
E-1 is probably an emotional one. There is..no evidence that getting _rid
(cont.) of cigarette vending machines is going to reduce the amount of
cigarettes sold which means that those persons smoking before are
probably going to continue to smoke. Mr. Berndt stated that he
believes that the new State law should be given a chance to work and
see what the impact is. If that and educational programs don't work,
the Council can take another look at total ban on machines.
Alderman.Solinger moved to -adopt an- ordinance - which would follow the
pattern of the new State law adding "to it that (1) the electronic
button on the machine be mounted in a fixed location somewhere out of
sight and out of reach to -anyone but the operator that is selling,
(2) proper signage be put on the cigarette vending.machine explaininj
the button situation,..(3) a written notice of enforcement of all the
licensing on cigarettes be sent to all license holders, (4) the
conditions of the license must be posted at the license location alor
with the license, and (5) the creation of a task force appointed by
the Mayor and accepted by the City Council of all people to look at
the situation and watch it as the State law unfolds and is tried.
Discussion by the Council. Alderman Strain noted that violation of
the State law is a gross misdemeanor punishable by,a $3000 fine and
90 days in jail. Mr. Strain noted that we should prosecute as this
is what the public is demanding.
Alderman Hunziker asked if it will be the seller or the business who
employes the seller who will receive the fine. Mr. Suhler noted
that as a practical matter the person who hands over the cigarettes
will be the person prosecuted.
Alderman Canfield noted that the Tobacco -Free Youth Task Force has
several useful suggestions in their letter.among them to remove the
entire burden from the shoulders of the parents because the mer-
chants have.the responsibility to obey the law. Their second
suggestion was that the Council incorporate into the ordinance
penalties against the business which would include suspension of
licenses as quoted in the City of Minneapolis law. Alderman Canfielc
asked that an amendment to the original motion be made to include an
additional penalty of complete revocation of the licenses for the
business selling the cigarettes.
Alderman Solinger noted that the one condition of his motion referrec
to the posting of conditions of the license meaning who is selling
or whatever are liable if they sell cigarettes.. He noted that this
should take care of some of the problem of minors selling to other
minors.
3539
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON
N° 3540 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
Adjourned -Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
E-1
(cont.
E-2
COUNCIL
Aldermen Canfield moved, Solinger seconded,. to amend the original
motion that the City may at its discretion hold a public hearing
for violators of the ordinance and act on suspension of their
license. Ayes (7), Nays (0).. Motion carried. ,
N° 3 5.4 0
Mr. Suhler related.that.the amendment is somewhat redundant because
the Council can move to suspend any license under the City ordinance!
if there is a violation of the license. However, Mr. Canfield felt
that it was important that enforcement be stressed.
The original motion with amendment added was voted upon. Ayes (7),
Nays (0). Motion carried.
The Council asked that the ordinance be put into effect as soon as
possible. The notice to all license holders is to be sent as soon
as the ordinance is effective.
Aldermen were concerned that the enforcement of this ordinance be
in the strictest sense possible. Aldermen Solinger moved, McConnell
seconded, that the City will notify all the license holders that the
City intends on enforcing the existing cigarette ordinance. Ayes (7:
Nays (0). Motion carried.
Wishing to be heard was James Sheehan. Aldermen Canfield moved,
McConnell seconded, to listen to Mr. Sheehan again on the issue of
sidewalks 6n Wilshire Drive N.E. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion
carried.
James Sheehan, 1644 Wilshire Drive N.E. Mr. Sheehan noted that he
had listened to the testimony of City staff on the tape of the
May 7, 1990.Council meeting on school attendance information on
Wilshire Drive. He noted that the information they received from
school district personnel was incorrect and was changed about one
year ago. Mr. Sheehan referred to Ordinance 1543, the sidewalk
ordinance of the City, noting that it indicates that when it is
determined because topographical conditions exist a sidewalk need not
be installed. He stated that there are topographic conditions on
Wilshire Drive that should be considered. The ordinance also states
that sidewalks are not required where they serve no useful purpose.
The sidewalk going down Wilshire Drive will serve no useful purpose.
He asked that the Council table or delay this project that deals
with only four residences and take the whole matter of Wilshire
Drive in one item rather than four homes at this time.
Alderman Solinger noted that Mr. Sheehan had a sidewalk in front of
his home that was put in by a previous Council and that this is
simply a replacement.
Mr. Plumb noted that the bids have been advertised on the project a
are to be opened on May 30th. The Public Services Department would
like to proceed at this time. Children from this area would go to
Winston Churchill School and adding a sidewalk would provide a
continuous sidewalk from this area to Winston Churchill.
1
Agenda
Item
E-2
(cont.
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA ,NO 3541
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Having no objection from the Council, Toni Hahn, 1652 Wilshire Drive
N.E. Mr. Hahn spoke voicing her objection to the placement of a
sidewalk in the area noting again the topographical conditions that
exist.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Solinger seconded, to proceed with the
sidewalk project as previously approved at the May 7, 1990 meeting.
Ayes (7), Nays.(0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Solinger moved, Strain seconded, to adopt'Resolution #
251-90 authorizing bids to be advertised for Airport Southeast Taxi-
way Construction (J-6912). Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Hunziker moved, Bluhm seconded, to adopt the following
Public Utility resolutions:
#252-90 - Burmeister Electric Company for furnishing 14 161KV dis-.
connect switches for $121,908.
#253-90 - Alton M. Johnson Company (Trench Electric) for furnishing
18 capacitor voltage transformers at $86,685.
#254-90 - International Business Machines Corporation for a 1991-19
electric service agreement. Rates and conditions of
service as stated in the contract.
#255-90 - Border States Electric for distribution padmount switches
for $24,685.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen McConnell moved, Canfield seconded, to instruct the City
Attorney to prepare an amendment to Ordinance.2633 to correct a
previously approved annexation which contained an erronous legal
description and instruct the staff ofthe-Consolidated-Planning De-
partment to take such steps as may be necessary to resolve the pro-
blem. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Bluhm seconded, to approve the following
licenses and bonds:
Over -the -Counter Cigarette Sales - Sullivan's Downtown Liquor
Master Installer's License - Tony Heroff
Heating, Ventilating & Air -Conditioning Contractor's License - Daniel
Williams DBA Dano's Chimney Sweep
Gambling License - (raffle) Bear Creek Services Foundation
Construct Cement Sidewalks, Curb $ Gutters, and Driveways - Mike
Jensen DBA Jensen Construction
Salvage Dealer License-.Olmsted,County Recycling Center
Heating, Ventilating & Air -Conditioning Contractor's -License - Thoma:
Haley DBA Haley Comfort Systems
Annual Gambling License -_Rochester Eagles Aerie #2228
Auction Permit - Paul Myhrom DBA Honest Bike Shop
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
.N° 3542 CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N9 35-42
Adjourned Meeting -No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
E-7
E-8
E-9
E-10
E-11
E-12
E-13
Aldermen Solinger moved, Strain seconded, to deny the request for
change in the Rochester Ordinance to allow the selling of off -sale
liquor on January 1st and July 4th. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion
carried.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Hunziker seconded, to approve the semi-
monthly payment of accounts in the amount of $885,007.84. Ayes (7),
Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Hunziker moved, McConnell seconded, to adopt Resolution
#256-90 accepting the low bid of Aspen Equipment Company for a
Bombardier BM-50 sidewalk plow at a cost of $33,498. Ayes (7),
Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Strain moved, Solinger seconded, to approve the annexation
of 4.58 acres of land in Section 9"; Rochester Township, and instruct
the City Attorney to prepare the required ordinance for adoption.
Ayes .: (7) , Nays (0) . Motion carried.
Aldermen Strain moved, McConnell seconded, to adopt Resolution
#257-90 approving the Metes and Bounds Conveyance of Unplatted Land
in Section 23, petitioned by Leslie A. Bluske, with the following
conditions:
(1) That the restriction against such conveyance will create
an unnecessary hardship.
(2) That such conveyance will not interfere.with the purposes of
the subdivision regulations.
(3) That the dedication of public utility or street easements
is not involved.
(4) That such conveyance involves the.division of a parcel into
not more than three separate parcels.
(5) That the new and residual parcels of land which would result
from the conveyance will meet the frontage and area require-
ments of the zoning ordinance.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Strain moved, Bluhm seconded., to deny the request for
vacation of a ten -foot utility easement in Innsbruck 3rd Subdivision,
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Solinger moved, Strain seconded, to adopt Resolution #258-9(
proceeding with Project No. 6217-3=90 (J-9153) "Street Reconstructiot
Concrete Curb and Gutter, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Service Con-
nections in Tudor Court S.W. from 6th Avenue S.W. to the west line
of Lot 14, Toogood Subdivision" and order a."hearing for June 18,
1990. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.-
C
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N? 3543
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
E-14
E-15
E-16
E-17
E-18
E-19
E-20
E-21
Aldermen Solinger moved, Canfield seconded, to purchase 3.77 acres if
fee simple interest and 5.66 acres in flowage easement on lands
identified as Parcel 6 for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers flood
control project, and approval to purchase 113 Second Street N.E. and
117 Third Street S.E. in fee simple interest for the amount of
$250,240. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Hunziker seconded; to approve a revocable
permit.for footing encroachments. at the.new Clinic View addition
project. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen. Solinger moved, Strain seconded, to adopt Resolution #259-6(
approving an.agreement between the City of Rochester and the Dakota,
Minnesota and Eastern Railroad for the 5th Street Expressway and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign such agreement. Ayes
(7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Solinger seconded, to adopt Resolution.
#260-90 adding paragraphs -to Section (B)."No.Parking Zones" of the
Comprehensive Parking and Traffic Resolution book. The adopted
resolution will place parking restrictions on various streets and
avenues adjacent to the new Mayo Clinic Employee Parking Ramp at
West Center and 5th Avenue. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen McConnell moved, Hunziker seconded,, to adopt Resolution
#261-90 awarding the contract on Project No. 6305-4-89 (J-9081)
"Grading and Paving, Street Widening and Resurfacing, Concrete Curb
and Gutter and Storm Sewer on lst Street N.W. from 4th to 6th
AVenue.N.W. and on 5th Avenue N.W. from Center Street to 1st Street
N.W." to Rochester Sand and Gravel, Incorporated for $98,086.10.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen McConnell moved, Strain seconded, to adopt Resolution
#262-90 authorizing payment for extra work covered by Supplemental
Agreement No. 1 for Project No. 8608-0-89 (J-9125) in the amount of
$3,102.12. Ayes (7), Nays (0).. Motion carried.
Aldermen Hunziker moved, Bluhm seconded, to adopt Resolution #263-90
authorizing payment for extra work covered by Supplemental Agreement
No. 1 for Project No. 6202-3-89 (J-9080) in the amount of $1,568.
Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Aldermen Solinger moved, Canfield seconded,.to purchase a private
parking lot owned by Hanny's, Incorporated at 114-118 First Avenue
for a part of the Civic Square Project site.- Ayes (7), Nays (0).
Potion carried.
The agreement will pay Hanny's $55,000 for the property, up to
$4,890 for relocation costs and the 1990 property taxes.
,E.
RECORD OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL
N° 3544 CITY OF'ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA N9 3544
Adjourned Meeting No. 32 - May 21, 1990
Agenda
Item
E-22
E-23
F-1
F-1
F-1
F-1
Aldermen Hunziker moved, Solinger seconded, to approve Change Order
No. 6 for the Peace Plaza in an amount not to exceed $12,300. The
change order will allow for enlargement to the Peace Fountain to
correct the water overspray. Ayes (6), Nays (1): Alderman_ Strain
voted nay. Motion carried.
Aldermen Canfield moved, Strain seconded, to approve an underground
sanitary sewer agreement in the amount of $7500 with the Dakota,
Minnesota and Eastern Railroad. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried
An Ordinance Establishing an Agricultural Zoning District Within the
City of Rochester was given a first reading.
An Ordinance Annexing 4.58 acres of Vacant Land in Section 9,
Rochester Township, was given a first reading. (Graciela and
Garton) I
An Ordinance Annexing land in the.East Half of the Northeast Quarte3
of Section 9-106N-14W was given'a first reading. (This ordinance
corrects a previously -passed and adopted annexation for the Bell -
Oaks property)
An Ordinance Amending the Current Cigarette Ordinance to include
provisions for stricter enforcement of vending machines was given a
first reading..
Aldermen Solinger moved, Strain seconded, to suspend the rules and
give the ordinance a second reading. Upon roll call vote: Aldermen
Bluhm, Canfield, Hunziker,- McConnell, Solinger,- Strain and President
Selby voted aye. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried..
The Ordinance was given a second reading. Aldermen Solinger moved,
Bluhm seconded, to adopt the ordinance as read. Ayes (7), Nays (0).
Motion carried.
Having no -further business, Aldermen Solinger moved, Strain
seconded, to adjourn. Ayes (7), Nays (0). Motion carried.
Deput Cit -Clerk
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Committee -of -the -Whole Minutes from April 16, April 23 and May 7, 19
r
90.