HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinding of Fact (a) - LandSubPermitR2016-002.StonebrookeThirdAddition
BEFORE THE COMMON COUNCIL
CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA
________________________________________
In Re: Land Subdivision Permit #R2016-002 Findings of Fact,
Stonebrooke Third Addition Conclusions of Law
And Order
________________________________________
On March 21, 2016, the Common Council of the City of Rochester conducted a public
hearing, upon notice to the public, to consider the Planning and Zoning Commission's findings of
the public hearing held on February 24, 2016, in response to Land Subdivision Permit
st
(Preliminary Plat) #R2016-002. At the March 21 public hearing, all interested persons were
given the opportunity to make presentations and give testimony concerning the application.
Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, the Common Council of the City of
Rochester does hereby make the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At its public hearing on this application, the Planning and Zoning Commission
considered the issue of whether Land Subdivision Permit (Preliminary Plat) #R2016-002 satisfied
the conditions of section 61.225, subd. 2, of the Rochester Code of Ordinances.
2. R.C.O. §61.225, subd. 2, provides that the Council shall approve a development permit
authorizing a land subdivision if all of the following findings with respect to the proposed
development are made:
A. The proposed land subdivision conforms to all relevant requirements
of this ordinance and variances have been granted to permit any
nonconformance;
B. The proposed water system and sanitary sewer system are adequate
to serve the normal and fire protection demands of proposed
development and to provide for the efficient and timely extension to
serve future development;
C. The plan for soil erosion and stormwater management meets the
adopted standards of the City of Rochester and is consistent with the
adopted Stormwater Management Plan or adopted drainage or
stormwater policies;
D. The vehicular and non-motorized system is consistent with adopted
transportation plans and is consistent with the street layout standards
listed in section 64.120 and traffic service standards in section
61.526;
E. The lot and block layout provide for safe and convenient vehicular,
service and emergency access, efficient utility service connections,
and adequate buildable area in each lot for planned uses;
F. The proposed land subdivision has taken into account the current six-
year and other Long-Range Capital Improvements Programs and the
elements listed therein in the design of the subdivision;
G. The proposed subdivision, if in a residential zoning district,
addresses the need for spillover parking consistent with the
requirements of section 63.426;
H. The right-of-ways and easements of adequate size and dimension
are provided for the purpose of constructing the street, utility, and
drainage facilities needed to serve the development;
I. The proposed parks, trail thoroughfares and open space dedications
are consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations;
J. The proposed subdivision will not have off-site impacts on the street,
drainage, water or wastewater systems that exceed adopted
standards;
K. The proposed subdivision will not have adverse impacts on the safety
or viability of permitted uses on adjacent properties;
L. The proposed land subdivision is designed in such a manner as to
allow for continued development in an efficient manner on adjacent
undeveloped lands;
2
2
M. The soils, topography and water tables have been adequately
studied to ensure that all lots are developable for their designated
purposes;
N. The proposed land subdivision is consistent with the standards of the
City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan;
O. Any land located within Zone A as shown on the currently adopted
Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps of Flood Insurance Study,
Rochester, Minnesota, prepared by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, is determined to be suitable for its intended
use and that the proposed subdivision adequately mitigates the risks
of flooding, inadequate drainage, soil and rock formations with severe
limitations for development, severe erosion potential, or any other
floodplain related risks to the health, safety or welfare of the future
residents of the proposed subdivision in a manner consistent with this
ordinance;
P. The proposed land subdivision, if approved, would not result in a
violation of federal or state law, or city or county ordinance; and
Q. The proposed land subdivision permit is consistent with any
approved and applicable General Development Plan, Conditional
Use Permit or Traffic Impact Study.
3. R.C.O. §61.226 authorizes the approving body to impose modifications or
conditions to the extent that such modifications or conditions are necessary to ensure compliance
with §61.225.
4. The Planning and Zoning Commission concluded that the application for Land
Subdivision Permit #R2016-002 satisfied the requirements of R.C.O. §61.225 if the following
conditions are imposed:
A. Grading and Drainage Plan approval is required prior to recording
of the Final Plat.
B. Execution of a City-Owner Contract and Dedication of any
applicable public easements is required prior to Final Plat
submittal.
3
3
C. Public easements are required for all public utilities and any public
drainage and must be shown on the plat.
D. Access control shall be dedicated along CSAH 9 and the right of
way required for the re-alignment shall be dedicated.
E. The approval of Brookestone Drive access on CSAH 9 allowed for
the deferred construction of a bypass lane until Phase III of the
development.
F. A monetary contribution toward the construction of a Two-Way left
turn lane is required.
G. Outlot B cannot be developed until re-platted.
st
5. At the March 21 public hearing, the Applicant’s representative agreed with the
above conditions as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
6. The Council concurs with and adopts as its own the findings of fact, conditions of
approval, and recommendation proposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. R.C.O. §61.225, subd. 2, provides that the Council shall approve a development
permit authorizing a land subdivision if all of the following findings with respect to the proposed
development are made:
A. The proposed land subdivision conforms to all relevant requirements
of this ordinance and variances have been granted to permit any
nonconformance;
B. The proposed water system and sanitary sewer system are
adequate to serve the normal and fire protection demands of
proposed development and to provide for the efficient and timely
extension to serve future development;
C. The plan for soil erosion and stormwater management meets the
adopted standards of the City of Rochester and is consistent with
the adopted Stormwater Management Plan or adopted drainage or
4
4
stormwater policies;
D. The vehicular and non-motorized system is consistent with adopted
transportation plans and is consistent with the street layout
standards listed in section 64.120 and traffic service standards in
section 61.526;
E. The lot and block layout provide for safe and convenient vehicular,
service and emergency access, efficient utility service connections,
and adequate buildable area in each lot for planned uses;
F. The proposed land subdivision has taken into account the current
six-year and other Long-Range Capital Improvements Programs and
the elements listed therein in the design of the subdivision;
G. The proposed land subdivision, if in a residential zoning district,
addresses the need for spillover parking consistent with the
requirements of section 63.426;
H. The right-of-ways and easements of adequate size and dimension
are provided for the purpose of constructing the street, utility, and
drainage facilities needed to serve the development;
I. The proposed parks, trail thoroughfares and open space dedications
are consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations;
J. The proposed subdivision will not have off-site impacts on the street,
drainage, water or wastewater systems that exceed adopted
standards;
K. The proposed subdivision will not have adverse impacts on the
safety or viability of permitted uses on adjacent properties;
L. The proposed land subdivision is designed in such a manner as to
allow for continued development in an efficient manner on adjacent
undeveloped lands;
M. The soils, topography and water tables have been adequately
studied to ensure that all lots are developable for their designated
purposes;
N. The proposed land subdivision is consistent with the standards of
the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan;
5
5
O. Any land located within Zone A as shown on the currently adopted
Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps of Flood Insurance Study,
Rochester, Minnesota, prepared by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, is determined to be suitable for its intended
use and that the proposed subdivision adequately mitigates the risks
of flooding, inadequate drainage, soil and rock formations with
severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, or any
other floodplain related risks to the health, safety or welfare of the
future residents of the proposed subdivision in a manner consistent
with this ordinance;
P. The proposed land subdivision, if approved, would not result in a
violation of federal or state law, or city or county ordinance; and
Q. The proposed land subdivision permit is consistent with any
approved and applicable General Development Plan, Conditional
Use Permit or Traffic Impact Study.
2. R.C.O. §61.226 authorizes the Council to impose conditions on its approval of a
development permit.
3. By a substantial amount of the evidence and testimony presented at the March 21,
2016, hearing, it is hereby determined by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that Land
Subdivision Permit #R2016-002 complies with the requirements of R.C.O. §61.225, subd. 2, if the
Applicant satisfies the seven conditions of approval recommended by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
ORDER
The Common Council of the City of Rochester, pursuant to R.C.O. §61.225, subd. 2, does
hereby approve Land Subdivision Permit (Preliminary Plat) #R2016-002 subject to the seven
conditions of approval recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
6
6
Dated at Rochester, Minnesota this _____ day of March, 2016.
________________________________
Randy Staver
President of the Rochester Common Council
Approved at Rochester, Minnesota this _____ day of March, 2016.
______________________________
Ardell F. Brede
Mayor of the City of Rochester
Fof.Zone15\\LandSub\\1602
7
7