Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinding of Fact - ChateauCircle.LandSubPermitR2015-010 BEFORE THE COMMON COUNCIL CITY OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA In Re: Land Subdivision Permit#R2015-010 Findings of Fact, Chateau Circle Conclusions of Law And Order On June 15, 2015, the Common Council of the City of Rochester conducted a public hearing, upon notice to the public, to consider the Planning and Zoning staffs findings recommended to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the Commission's public hearing held on May 27, 2015, in response to Land Subdivision Permit (Preliminary Plat) #R2015-010. At the June 15th public hearing before the Common Council, all interested persons were given the opportunity to make presentations and give testimony concerning the application. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, the Common Council of the City of Rochester does hereby make the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. At its public hearing on this application, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the issue of whether Land Subdivision Permit (Preliminary Plat) #R2015-010 satisfied the conditions of section 61.225 of the Rochester Code of Ordinances. 2. R.C.O. §61.225 provides that the Council shall approve a development permit authorizing a land subdivision if all of the following findings with respect to the proposed development are made: A. The proposed land subdivision conforms to all relevant requirements of this ordinance and variances have been granted to permit any nonconformance; B. The proposed water system and sanitary sewer system are adequate to serve the normal and fire protection demands of proposed development and to provide for the efficient and timely extension to serve future development; C. The plan for soil erosion and stormwater management meets the adopted standards of the City of Rochester and is consistent with the adopted Stormwater Management Plan or adopted drainage or stormwater policies; D. The vehicular and non-motorized system is consistent with adopted transportation plans and is consistent with the street layout standards listed in section 64.120 and traffic service standards in section 61.526; E. The lot and block layout provide for safe and convenient vehicular, service and emergency access, efficient utility service connections, and adequate buildable area in each lot for planned uses; F. The proposed land subdivision has taken into account the current six- year and other Long-Range Capital Improvements Programs and the elements listed therein in the design of the subdivision; G. The proposed subdivision, if in a residential zoning district, addresses the need for spillover parking consistent with the requirements of section 63.426; H. The right-of-ways and easements of adequate size and dimension are provided for the purpose of constructing the street, utility, and drainage facilities needed to serve the development; I. The proposed parks, trail thoroughfares and open space dedications are consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations; J. The proposed subdivision will not have off-site impacts on the street, drainage, water or wastewater systems that exceed adopted standards; K. The proposed subdivision will not have adverse impacts on the safety or viability of permitted uses on adjacent properties; L. The proposed land subdivision is designed in such a manner as to allow for continued development in an efficient manner on adjacent 2 undeveloped lands; M. The soils, topography and water tables have been adequately studied to ensure that all lots are developable for their designated purposes; N. The proposed land subdivision is consistent with the standards of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; O. Any land located within Zone A as shown on the currently adopted Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps of Flood Insurance Study, Rochester, Minnesota, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is determined to be suitable for its intended use and that the proposed subdivision adequately mitigates the risks of flooding, inadequate drainage, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, or any other floodplain related risks to the health, safety or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision in a manner consistent with this ordinance; P. The proposed land subdivision, if approved, would not result in a violation of federal or state law, or city or county ordinance; and Q. The proposed land subdivision permit is consistent with any approved and applicable General Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit or Traffic Impact Study. 3. R.C.O. §61.226 authorizes the approving body to impose modifications or conditions to the extent that such modifications or conditions are necessary to ensure compliance with §61.225. 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission concluded that the application for Land Subdivision Permit #R2015-010 did not satisfy the requirements of R.C.O. §61.225 as a result of the Commission's recommended denial of the applicant's special district application. 5. Prior to the Commission's May 27th meeting, the Planning and Zoning staff concluded that the application for Land Subdivision Permit #R2015-010 satisfied the 3 requirements of R.C.O. §61.225 if the following conditions are imposed: A. No development will be allowed to occur until the City Council has determined that all required public facilities are adequate for said development. Alternatively, the developer may request to join with the City in making these inadequate public facilities adequate for this development, and may enter into a development agreement, prior to recording a Final Plat for the property, that outlines the developer's and City's obligations related, but not limited to: access, stormwater management (including any obligations for on or off-site facilities), transportation improvements (including any off-site improvements necessary to accommodate this development), pedestrian facilities, contributions for existing & future public infrastructure, and the extension of public utilities to abutting properties where applicable. B. Grading and Drainage Plan approval is required prior to recording a Final Plat for the property. C. Dedication of Controlled Access shall be shown on the Final Plat, consistent with the terms for required access control as specified in the Development Agreement for the Property. D. Execution of a City-Owner Contract, and dedication of any applicable off-site public easements is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. E. The Owner is obligated to provide pedestrian facilities along the entire public road frontages of the Property, either within the ROW, or within a public easement dedicated to cover said facilities. Construction of said facilities, and dedication of any applicable easements will be addressed through the review and approval process for individual lot development, or at the time of Final Plat. F. Boulevard trees will be required for the development. Prior to the development of the property, the Owner shall determine which of the two available options, Payment Method or Install Boulevard Trees, will be used to meet their boulevard tree obligations for each phase of development. Once the option is selected, the Owner shall either make applicable cash payment to the Rochester Park & Recreation Department or submit a planting 4 plan to the City Forester for a planting permit prior to final development approval. Trees shall be planted every 35 feet. G. No public water main extensions are shown within this submittal. The developer of each lot will need to provide public water main extensions and easements as needed to provide adequate fire protection to the buildings as there is no water main currently within Villa Rd. NW. A looped system passing through each lot along with an extension to Villa Rd. may be necessary to provide the required flows and water circulation as "dead end" systems are to be avoided. H. Access control will need to be dedicated on the final plat. A 10' Trail easement along the south property line will need to be provided for trail realignment in the future. Olmsted County Public Works must fully review and approve the Chateau Road realignment including access points and lane geometry. 6. At the June 15th public hearing, the Applicant's representative agreed with the above conditions as recommended by the Planning and Zoning staff. 7. The Council concurs with and adopts as its own the findings of fact, conditions of approval, and recommendation proposed by the Planning and Zoning staff. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. R.C.O. §61.225 provides that the Council shall approve a development permit authorizing a land subdivision if all of the following findings with respect to the proposed development are made: A. The proposed land subdivision conforms to all relevant requirements of this ordinance and variances have been granted to permit any nonconformance; B. The proposed water system and sanitary sewer system are adequate to serve the normal and fire protection demands of proposed development and to provide for the efficient and timely extension to serve future development; 5 C. The plan for soil erosion and stormwater management meets the adopted standards of the City of Rochester and is consistent with the adopted Stormwater Management Plan or adopted drainage or stormwater policies; D. The vehicular and non-motorized system is consistent with adopted transportation plans and is consistent with the street layout standards listed in section 64.120 and traffic service standards in section 61.526; E. The lot and block layout provide for safe and convenient vehicular, service and emergency access, efficient utility service connections, and adequate buildable area in each lot for planned uses; F. The proposed land subdivision has taken into account the current six-year and other Long-Range Capital Improvements Programs and the elements listed therein in the design of the subdivision; G. The proposed land subdivision, if in a residential zoning district, addresses the need for spillover parking consistent with the requirements of section 63.426; H. The right-of-ways and easements of adequate size and dimension are provided for the purpose of constructing the street, utility, and drainage facilities needed to serve the development; I. The proposed parks, trail thoroughfares and open space dedications are consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations; J. The proposed subdivision will not have off-site impacts on the street, drainage, water or wastewater systems that exceed adopted standards; K. The proposed subdivision will not have adverse impacts on the safety or viability of permitted uses on adjacent properties; L. The proposed land subdivision is designed in such a manner as to allow for continued development in an efficient manner on adjacent undeveloped lands; M. The soils, topography and water tables have been adequately studied to ensure that all lots are developable for their designated purposes; 6 N. The proposed land subdivision is consistent with the standards of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; O. Any land located within Zone A as shown on the currently adopted Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps of Flood Insurance Study, Rochester, Minnesota, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is determined to be suitable for its intended use and that the proposed subdivision adequately mitigates the risks of flooding, inadequate drainage, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, or any other floodplain related risks to the health, safety or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision in a manner consistent with this ordinance; P. The proposed land subdivision, if approved, would not result in a violation of federal or state law, or city or county ordinance; and Q. The proposed land subdivision permit is consistent with any approved and applicable General Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit or Traffic Impact Study. 2. R.C.O. §61.226 authorizes the Council to impose conditions on its approval of a development permit. 3. By a substantial amount of the evidence and testimony presented at the June 15, 2015, hearing, it is hereby determined by the Common Council of the City of Rochester that Land Subdivision Permit #R2015-010 complies with the requirements of R.C.O. §61.225 if the Applicant satisfies the eight conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning staff. ORDER The Common Council of the City of Rochester, pursuant to R.C.O. §61.225, does hereby approve Land Subdivision Permit (Preliminary Plat) #R2015-010 subject to the eight conditions recommended by the Planning and Zoning staff. Dated at Rochester, Minnesota this day of June, 2015. Randy Staver President of the Rochester Common Council Approved at Rochester, Minnesota this day of June, 2015. Ardell F. Brede Mayor of the City of Rochester Fof.Zone15\LandSub\1510 8